• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

There are times when telling just part of the truth is effectively a lie.

“What are Republicans afraid of?” Everything.

You know it’s bad when the Project 2025 people have to create training videos on “How To Be Normal”.

After dobbs, women are no longer free.

Hey Washington Post, “Democracy Dies in Darkness” was supposed to be a warning, not a mission statement.

If you don’t believe freedom is for everybody, then the thing you love isn’t freedom, it is privilege.

You’re just a puppy masquerading as an old coot.

Give the craziest people you know everything they want and hope they don’t ask for more? Great plan.

When you’re a Republican, they let you do it.

These days, even the boring Republicans are nuts.

Hell hath no fury like a farmer bankrupted.

There are some who say that there are too many strawmen arguments on this blog.

They are lying in pursuit of an agenda.

Teach a man to fish, and he’ll sit in a boat all day drinking beer.

Polls are now a reliable indicator of what corporate Republicans want us to think.

If senate republicans had any shame, they’d die of it.

I might just take the rest of the day off and do even more nothing than usual.

Republicans got rid of McCarthy. Democrats chose not to save him.

“A king is only a king if we bow down.” – Rev. William Barber

Fight them, without becoming them!

Trump’s cabinet: like a magic 8 ball that only gives wrong answers.

Motto for the House: Flip 5 and lose none.

Trumpflation is an intolerable hardship for every American, and it’s Trump’s fault.

I would gladly pay you tuesday for a hamburger today.

Mobile Menu

  • 4 Directions VA 2025 Raffle
  • 2025 Activism
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • 2025 Activism
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • Targeted Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Open Threads / Late Night Open Thread: (Probably Not) The Last of Dinesh D’Scrwsher

Late Night Open Thread: (Probably Not) The Last of Dinesh D’Scrwsher

by Anne Laurie|  October 20, 20123:43 am| 99 Comments

This post is in: Open Threads, Republican Stupidity, Assholes

FacebookTweetEmail

Since I am neither a Christian, a Christianist, or a nice person, I will admit to taking vulgar pleasure in the highly public depantsing of Dinesh “Nothing Happened” D’Souza. Do not miss the full glory of Doghouse Riley’s “Petards Are for Hoisting“:

HERE’S the thing about D’ines’h D’Souza: he found himself a nice little sinecure in America defending the Raj. That comes with a price, of course. Not in swallowing the understandable anger and disgust the Anglo-American Man’s Burden must engender in its erstwhile subjects; that sort of thing seems to go down easy with second or fifth-generation mandarins. It’s just that, inevitably, someone with D’Souza’s rh’torical gifts has got to figure (and rightly so) that These People Are Dumb As Stumps, and go looking for further fields of plunder.

Lacking Hitchens gifts, D’inesh had to settle for life as a Toolbelt to the neocons, and pan for gold among the evangelical dross, jettisoning his Catholicism somewhere along the way. Sorta. (Again, fortunately for D’Souza, in those circles one can now be a best-selling Christian apologist without taking sides on the Reformation, which has apparently been relegated to the intellectual dung pit alongside the Trinitarian debate, the question of translation, and the George W. Bush administration….

Or Josh Fruhlinger at Wonkette:

“God has a mighty future for Dinesh, but there are some things he has to go through first”, said [King’s College chairman Andy] Mills [tweeted].

We assume this is nice evangelical code for “the restraining order stipulates that you must remain 150 yards or more away from our campus at all times.”

Steve M. at No More Mr. Nice Blog points out “DINESH D’SOUZA’S PENIS IS NOW HELPING US LOSE THE WAR WITH ISLAMOFASCISTS, OR SOMETHING LIKE THAT“:

Dinesh D’Souza, the married, 51-year-old right-wing author and inspiration for the film 2016: Obama’s America, once wrote a book called The Enemy at Home: The Cultural Left and Its Responsibility for 9/11. The thesis of this book is that the loosening of conservative moral strictures in the West is alienating Muslims, and Muslims, as a result, are so pissed off that they feel they have no choice but to kill us…

Following his own logic, we can only ask: Why is Dinesh D’Souza encouraging Islamofascism and destroying the life of his own daughter?

(In a completely inexcusable sidenote, the Daily Mail assures me that D’Souza has retained his taste for what my Irish nana called “rat-faced bottle blondes.”)

The single funniest paragraph on this topic so far, however, was posted by the man himself, at the end of a six-point masterpiece of legalistic hair-splitting and wounded feelings:

… Ultimately this is… about how we Christians are supposed to behave with one another. And the secular world is watching. Is this how we love and treat fellow believers? If my conduct was improper, wouldn’t it be the decent and charitable thing to approach me about it? Instead, here is a clear attempt to destroy my career and my ministry. This is viciousness masquerading as righteousness. And this is the behavior that is truly worthy of Christian condemnation.

This is the man responsible for 2016: Obama’s America, based on his invention of a President Obama driven by his dead father’s “fanatic anti-colonialism” to attempt to destroy all that is good in America and the world. But then, D’Souza does not believe that President Obama is the right kind of Christian, I suppose…

D’Souza’s inexplicable failure to cite the time-tested traditional “At least I wasn’t despoiling a virgin” Biblical double standard in his own defence set me wondering: What of the mysterious Charles Bovary in this Randian romance, the Mr. Joseph II whom Dinesh’s latest soulmate married only last December? (Presumably, when he told her how she should vote, he forgot to add “Also, don’t spend the weekend in a Comfort Inn with another married guy, even if he is willing to tell his sponsors you’re his fiancee.”) Is Mr. Joseph II resigned — perhaps even a little proud — to lose his helpmeet to a Galtian hero with a higher Q score? Does he repine in their once happy home, surrounded by the faux-french Pier-One “avarices” Denise lusted after in her now defunct blog?


(Well, at least she can’t be accused of hiding her goals… )

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « Early Morning Open Thread And Bruce Springsteen
Next Post: Free Range Saturday: Open Thread »

Reader Interactions

99Comments

  1. 1.

    ulee

    October 20, 2012 at 3:58 am

    He’ll be giving many speeches at a few thousand dollars a shot in the years to come and the haters will eat it up, truth be damned. Once you’re in of the club, you’re never out of the club.

  2. 2.

    The Other Chuck

    October 20, 2012 at 4:00 am

    A funny thing, English: “pantsing” and “depantsing” mean the same thing.

    As for what the story was aboot … Dinesh D’Who’s A Hypocritical Windbag And We All Knew It? I guess I have Wingnut Meltdown Fatigue, nothing these guys do even shocks me into even caring what they did or say anymore.

  3. 3.

    maven

    October 20, 2012 at 4:05 am

    This douche once commented on his own failing………

    ” …men tend to be over-represented in the genius category and also in the category of dummies and mental retards.”

    (ysursa.com/history/Reference%20pages/crossfire.htm)

    I know he was including himself in one or the other category; likely the latter.

  4. 4.

    Another Halocene Human

    October 20, 2012 at 4:16 am

    @maven: Doghouse posted Colbert but he also got pantsed by Maher and recently. In fact, that was the most recent major humiliation before this brouhaha.

    D’Souza is a deeply stupid man and when Bill “Smug Mug” Maher makes you look confused and dumb you know you’d better stick to trying that shtick with brainwashed “sheep” who have a need to believe.

  5. 5.

    Haydnseek

    October 20, 2012 at 4:18 am

    @The Other Chuck: I know just what you mean. Whackaloon overload takes its toll. They count on this in that endless human wave attack way, and we know it, but sonofabitch, after so many years it wears you down. I’m not a kid anymore, and I know that’s no excuse, but sometimes you have to just say fuck it and live your life.

  6. 6.

    Joseph Nobles

    October 20, 2012 at 4:19 am

    $33 million domestic gross for “2016: Obama’s America.” This motherfucker will be back.

    Hell, Ralph Reed is probably making sure he has a hooker while we speak.

  7. 7.

    xian

    October 20, 2012 at 4:24 am

    when Sam Alito’s beloved “Concerned Alumni of Princeton (against coeducation)” couldn’t find a single undergrad in the Reagan 80s to edit their idiotic right-wing Dartmouth Review clone they imported this toad to publish his drivel on our campus and nobody fucking read the thing — dude’s been crapping in my watershed for far too long

  8. 8.

    freelancer

    October 20, 2012 at 4:36 am

    I watched his movie the other night. It’s a deeply stupid exercise in wingnut projection (Though, it can be asked, what is it that wingnuts do that isn’t an exercise in deeply stupid acts of projection?)

    Salon’s Alex O’Hehir’s review of 2016 just vivisects D’Souza and his “film” and is worth reading in full (bold my emphasis):

    Indeed, D’Souza’s entire career is based on being a man from the developing world who resists the left-wing dogmas of anti-imperialism and anti-colonialism so common in the intellectual circles of those countries, and who has instead embraced a cartoon version of Americanism. Being born an Indian Catholic was evidently not weird enough; in his American life D’Souza has reinvented himself as an evangelical Christian, and authored apologetic tomes about the nature of God and the prospects of the afterlife. Neither was it sufficient to become a Reaganite in favor of hawkish policies abroad and trickle-down economics at home; D’Souza had to become the kind of William Bennett-on-steroids nutjob who argues that the cultural left in America was responsible for the 9/11 attacks, and that gay marriage can’t work because women are the only force that can civilize men. In a disarming if ill-considered moment, he once told Stephen Colbert that he shared Islamic militants’ hostile view of liberal American decadence.
    …
    I genuinely think we need to go deeper, and look for a psychological explanation, an upside-down version of the one D’Souza applies to Obama.
    __
    My own hypothesis is that D’Souza looks at the cosmopolitan politician with the third-world upbringing and sees a distorted mirror reflection, as well as a road not taken. There is no question that the young Obama flirted with Marxism, black radicalism and anti-colonial ideologies during his years at Occidental College, Columbia and Harvard Law. He has discussed the allure of those philosophies, with the dispassion that seems to be his natural instrument, in his autobiographical works. No doubt those associations, on their own, are enough to scare some voters off, but D’Souza simply cannot believe that the young Obama could have studied with professors like the late Palestinian renaissance man Edward Said or brainiac Brazilian philosopher Roberto Mangabeira Unger (both of whom are rendered here as unrecognizable caricatures) without becoming perverted to their supposedly sinister agenda.
    __
    D’Souza’s demented anti-Obama crusade feels personal more than political. Early in “2016” he says that his own grandfather was an Indian nationalist driven by anti-British and anti-white prejudice, who urged him not to go to America. This is a man who is intimately familiar with the seductive pull of anti-colonial thinking – the tendency to blame the legacy of Western domination for all the developing world’s problems – and must struggle manfully against it every hour of every day. He’s cast himself as a Brooks Brothers version of Frodo Baggins in an epic psychodrama no one else understands, fighting on behalf of a culture he largely despises against the power of the One Ring of post-colonial theory, forged in secret Ivy League seminar rooms by Barack Sauron Obama. On the famous theory expressed in David Mamet’s play “Edmond” that every fear hides a wish, I wonder which of these guys really dreams about destroying America.

  9. 9.

    hamletta

    October 20, 2012 at 4:37 am

    I had no idea that it is considered wrong in Christian circles to be engaged prior to being divorced, even though in a state of separation and in divorce proceedings. Obviously I would not have introduced Denise as my fiancé at a Christian apologetics conference if I had thought or known I was doing something wrong. But as a result of all this, and to avoid even the appearance of impropriety, Denise and I have decided to suspend our engagement.

    Jesus, Mary and Joseph, this man was raised Catholic. My left tit he “had no idea” is was “considered wrong.”

  10. 10.

    burnspbesq

    October 20, 2012 at 4:41 am

    I dunno about all of this piling on. My dictionary defines schadenfreude as “quiet satisfaction at the misfortune of another.”

  11. 11.

    hamletta

    October 20, 2012 at 4:46 am

    P.S. He mentions Marvin Olasky, an equally vile Krazy Kristian, with whom he has had an ongoing pissing contest.

    I guess Olasky won this round.

  12. 12.

    hamletta

    October 20, 2012 at 4:47 am

    @burnspbesq: Well, let’s call it loudenfreude, then.

  13. 13.

    Anne Laurie

    October 20, 2012 at 4:51 am

    @hamletta:

    Jesus, Mary and Joseph, this man was raised Catholic. My left tit he “had no idea” it was “considered wrong.”

    To be fair, in the working-class Catholic parish I grew up in during the 1960s, it was widely believed that Protestantism only existed because (a) Henry VIII wanted to screw Anne Boleyn, and (b) Martin Luther wanted to screw a nun. So, y’know, maybe Dinesh figured “Hey, I thought you Prots were intrisically pro-divorce!” would make a good apologetics defense (/sarcasm)

  14. 14.

    freelancer

    October 20, 2012 at 4:54 am

    @Anne Laurie:

    That is being WAY more than charitable, as the word “charitable” is understood.

  15. 15.

    Amir Khalid

    October 20, 2012 at 4:57 am

    @hamletta:
    Me, I call it gloating. (But, just this once, not with disapproval.)

  16. 16.

    Haydnseek

    October 20, 2012 at 5:00 am

    @burnspbesq:Are you wearing a tie and a cardigan right now? I’ll wait for you to tend to your pipe before you answer…………

  17. 17.

    SamR

    October 20, 2012 at 5:05 am

    His own statement is amazing:

    I had no idea that it is considered wrong in Christian circles to be engaged prior to being divorced, even though in a state of separation and in divorce proceedings. Obviously I would not have introduced Denise as my fiancé at a Christian apologetics conference if I had thought or known I was doing something wrong.

    Reminds me of the classic Seinfeld where George is confronted by his boss for sleeping with the cleaning lady on his desk:

    youtube.com/watch?v=-RvNS7JfcMM

    Transcript of it:

    Was that wrong? Should I not have done that? I tell you, I gotta plead ignorance on this thing, because if anyone had said anything to me at all when I first started here that that sort of thing is frowned upon…

    Honestly, George is closer to the truth. D’Souza acts like he’s only vaguely familiar with the tenets of Christianity, as well as unaware that within evangelical Christianity divorce itself is a sin. Lame.

  18. 18.

    Sister Rail Gun of Warm Humanitarianism

    October 20, 2012 at 5:10 am

    A bit of idle amusement: the guys behind the October Surprise website have surrendered. It was indeed a rickroll.

  19. 19.

    hamletta

    October 20, 2012 at 5:11 am

    The real ha-ha joke of all this is that he was paid $1M/yr as president of a “college” with 400 students on a good day.

    Well, before he got his ass fired, anyway.

  20. 20.

    Haydnseek

    October 20, 2012 at 5:16 am

    Alright Burnsey, I’ll be watching as well. The fact that you even care makes you OK in my book, regardless of the usual comment byplay. I’m a Spurs supporter as a result of a stay in the part of North London that I could afford way back when. By the bye, I shouldn’t have said anything about the cardigan and the pipe. That was out of line.

  21. 21.

    freelancer

    October 20, 2012 at 5:21 am

    @hamletta:

    Using “mathematics”, that means $2500 of every student’s tuition went straight to lining this grifter’s pocketbook.

    Not a bad gig, if you can stomach the shame.

  22. 22.

    Fuck ALL the chickens! (né Studly Pantload, t.e.u.u.)

    October 20, 2012 at 5:29 am

    It’s as I’ve been sayin’ for going on three weeks, now: Live by fucking that chicken, die by fucking that chicken.

    Or, to turn another fine phrase for the Republicans: you’re gonna need a bigger chicken.

  23. 23.

    liberal

    October 20, 2012 at 5:35 am

    Re Dinesh, there’s a veritable concern troll party over at Mark Kleiman’s SameFacts blog.

  24. 24.

    sm*t cl*de

    October 20, 2012 at 5:37 am

    a clear attempt to destroy my career and my ministry.
    He’s promoted himself to a feckin’ MINISTRY now??

    Though you do have to give the guy some respect for (1) ripping off the marks to the tune of $1000000 / year, and (2) holding conservative christians in such deep contempt as to flaunt his floozy in front of them at a conference.

  25. 25.

    hamletta

    October 20, 2012 at 5:38 am

    @freelancer: Jeepers! That’s some hard-core grifting!

    I’m trying to think of some character who would be jealous, but Cain and Carver died too soon.

    Aimee Semple McPherson, though. She’d be pissed; she had to spend all that time hiding out in the desert. Totes sucked.

  26. 26.

    hamletta

    October 20, 2012 at 5:42 am

    @sm*t cl*de: Dude, when you’re a p’ofessional Christian, your every bloviation is your “ministry.”

    Vile, isn’t it?

  27. 27.

    hamletta

    October 20, 2012 at 5:45 am

    Oh, y’all, when I went to save D’Souza’s feeble response to Evernote, the tags it offered up were “assholes” and “1%.”

    How did it know?

  28. 28.

    TheMightyTrowel

    October 20, 2012 at 5:47 am

    quiet Saturday evening here. planted some herbs, committed genocide on an ant nest i found in my shed. now I’m kicking back with some chocolate and a tray novel. as to the rest, the Greeks always said debris would get the self-important in the end

  29. 29.

    cmm

    October 20, 2012 at 5:54 am

    Dinesh hs come a long way since he stole Gay Student Aalliance correspondence and published it in the Review, outing several of the GSA’s members in the process. What a repugnant little toad of a man.

  30. 30.

    bemused

    October 20, 2012 at 6:10 am

    Hilarious.

    It will be a hoot to see how he reinvents himself after this. It’s inevitable he will. He is a wingnut savant shapeshifter.

  31. 31.

    Robert Waldmann

    October 20, 2012 at 6:24 am

    On the “completely inexcusable sidenote”

    I clicked the link (of course). I note that your Irish nana has never seen Denise Odie (D’Souza d’ate) and, while the blondness definitely came in a bottle, she has a lovely face along with her completely mysterious and incomprehensible taste in men.

    I mean the woman has shared a hotel room with Dinish D’Souza — don’t you think she has suffered enough ?

  32. 32.

    SRW1

    October 20, 2012 at 6:25 am

    Nothing as pathetic as a bully whining about being bullied. Even if it’s only a pen-bully being pen-bullied.

  33. 33.

    SRW1

    October 20, 2012 at 6:30 am

    @Robert Waldmann:

    Maybe he can cite the Kamasutra backwards.

  34. 34.

    the dude

    October 20, 2012 at 6:36 am

    “This is viciousness masquerading as righteousness”

    Or, as Oscar Wilde once said, “On an occasion of this kind it becomes more than a moral duty to speak one’s mind. It becomes a pleasure.”.

  35. 35.

    amk

    October 20, 2012 at 6:37 am

    Yet another proof that the fucking gods are on the side of that kenyan muslin usurper.

  36. 36.

    TheMightyTrowel

    October 20, 2012 at 6:42 am

    for the nerds among us, US elections as seen by Australia’s media

    canberratimes.com.au/data-point/the-a-to-z-of-american-politics-20121019-27wsa.html

  37. 37.

    Frankensteinbeck

    October 20, 2012 at 6:51 am

    “God has a mighty future for Dinesh, but there are some things he has to go through first”, said [King’s College chairman Andy] Mills [tweeted].

    This doesn’t sound like a restraining order. It sounds like IOKIYAR.

    @Robert Waldmann:
    I must disagree. Of the women shown there he’s dated, his wife is the prettiest and I’m not at all impressed. This latest appears to be made of plastic. She would be okay otherwise, but I’m sensitive to bad skin. The other two have faces carved by hate, which I also can’t stand.

  38. 38.

    aimai

    October 20, 2012 at 6:56 am

    @the dude:
    Now that is le mot juste.

    aimai

  39. 39.

    aimai

    October 20, 2012 at 7:22 am

    Oh to be a fly on the wall at King of King of King Kong’s College which was meant to take evaneglical purity right into the heart of the sexy beast that is New York. Oh the humanity! To think that Dinesh was corrupted by Moloch so fast! I wonder if they are pro-rating his salary?

    aimai

  40. 40.

    Origuy

    October 20, 2012 at 7:28 am

    How about some music to go with the schadenfreude? Tuesday night I’m planning to go to the Freight & Salvage in Berkeley to see Carlos Núñez, the great Galician gaita (Spanish bagpipe) player. He’s played with the Chieftains. Here he is accompanying some great flamenco dancing.

  41. 41.

    Jerzy Russian

    October 20, 2012 at 7:34 am

    Would it be unchristian of me to call this guy a dickhead?

  42. 42.

    kay

    October 20, 2012 at 7:38 am

    I think he genuinely could not have known it was a problem.

    I have never seen any disinclination to divorce among Republican Christians here. It’s anecdotal, but I’d go the other way. They divorce a lot. IMO, they’re serial marriers. The thing is to BE
    married, not STAY married.

    The “fiancée” use is also incredibly common. They announce the INTENT to marry with that word. It’s like a magic shield against adultury or sex outside of
    marriage, “fiancée”.

    I don’t blame him for parsing the rules and fucking up the acceptable order of events. It’s legalistic. It is better to get married when you’re 17 and pregnant
    and then get divorced a year later than it is to not marry, as long as you immediately re-marry. I still have no idea how the rules work, but timing is incredibly important.

    I personally think the key to why I don’t get it is that I don’t conflate the state
    role in marriage with the religious role, but they do. The state imprint IS the validity. He was looking at the wrong “code”.

  43. 43.

    Cermet

    October 20, 2012 at 7:40 am

    @ulee: He’ll be giving many speeches at a few thousand dollars a shot in the years to come and the haters will eat it up, truth be damned. Once you’re in of the club dumb, you’re never out of the club you’re always dumb.

    Edited for clarity

  44. 44.

    Hal

    October 20, 2012 at 7:44 am

    @sm*t cl*de:

    a clear attempt to destroy my career and my ministry.He’s promoted himself to a feckin’ MINISTRY now??

    He ministers to white people who hate Obama for reasons they can’t quite pinpoint *cough cough*

    Also:

    Barack Sauron Obama

    Now that’s someone I could vote for…

  45. 45.

    Donut

    October 20, 2012 at 8:29 am

    Not that I’m an expert on Eastern philosophical concepts, but doesn’t this whole situation fit the basic definition of karma?

  46. 46.

    SFAW

    October 20, 2012 at 8:33 am

    @Jerzy Russian:

    Would it be unchristian of me to call this guy a dickhead?

    Depends. Did lightning strike you after you typed that? If not, then you’re probably OK.

  47. 47.

    Or something like that.Suffern Ace

    October 20, 2012 at 8:39 am

    @hamletta: Olasky when I last heard of him was writing favorably about 19th century work houses and solving the problems of poverty by driving the poor from the city limits. Then for 20 years, I haven’t heard from him.

  48. 48.

    Svensker

    October 20, 2012 at 8:41 am

    She’s wearing a cross and is a big Ayn Rand fan. How does that work?

  49. 49.

    ericblair

    October 20, 2012 at 8:43 am

    @Svensker:

    She’s wearing a cross and is a big Ayn Rand fan. How does that work?

    Tribal markers with no other meaning. Kinda like having both the Stars and Stripes and Stars and Bars on your pick-em-up truck.

  50. 50.

    aimai

    October 20, 2012 at 8:43 am

    @Svensker:

    She reminds me of a skinny, anorexic, Edina from Absolutely Fabulous. Both Ayn Rand and the Cross are simply fashion accessories. “La Croix, baybeee!”

    aimai

  51. 51.

    Or something like that.Suffern Ace

    October 20, 2012 at 8:58 am

    @Donut: Nah. It’s plain old poetic justic with a bit of irony thrown in. Our poor Dinesh feels slandered and libeled. I find his fate to be delicious.

    @kay: I know you’re trying to be fair and trying to put his words in a context where they might make sense. But I can only say…don’t. I think this man deserves every bit of extremely unflattering context you can think of. Although it is nice that you rescue him by pointing out the marital hypocrisy of his fellow travelers. But please…less benefit of the doubt. I think his actions speak of someone who was raised by a slut. He’s clearly been hiding those mother issues.

  52. 52.

    Walker

    October 20, 2012 at 9:18 am

    @freelancer:

    Using “mathematics”, that means $2500 of every student’s tuition went straight to lining this grifter’s pocketbook

    As president, his primary job is to bring in money from donors. If having a high profile president like this meant that they were actually bringing in that much more money from donors, then he would have been worth the price.

    But it is also why he needs to be fired immediately if he sullies the brand.

  53. 53.

    Villago Delenda Est

    October 20, 2012 at 9:27 am

    Dinesch D’Dumbass is fortunate that his Talibangical fellows didn’t stone his Jeebofascist ass for adultery.

  54. 54.

    Linda Featheringill

    October 20, 2012 at 9:29 am

    D’Souza:

    This is viciousness masquerading as righteousness.

    He’s right about that, of course.

    On the other hand, he has dabbled in that particular sin quite a bit before now and probably knows what he’s talking about.

  55. 55.

    Villago Delenda Est

    October 20, 2012 at 9:34 am

    @freelancer:

    On the famous theory expressed in David Mamet’s play “Edmond” that every fear hides a wish, I wonder which of these guys really dreams about destroying America.

    Well, it has been painfully obvious for some time now that the Fundigelicals hate, hate, hate the Enlightenment. The United States is a fruit of the Enlightenment. Therefore, they wish to destroy this country and replace it with some nightmare out of the pages of Margaret Atwood.

  56. 56.

    mai naem

    October 20, 2012 at 9:43 am

    I find this stuff fvcking hilarious. The idjit was a tight ass who didn’t want to pay for an extra hotel room so he gets caught and loses his job and his rep. BTW, his salary was 194K not 1 mill. Apparently, he exaggerated it to make his fellow grifters jealous. Gimme a break. He was staying at a Comfort Inn. Not like he was staying at some 400 dollar a night Ritz. How much can a fvcking Comfort Inn in Spartanburg? $80 max. He could have said she was his assistant and slept together but not shared the room.

  57. 57.

    Citizen Alan

    October 20, 2012 at 9:46 am

    @aimai:

    She reminds me of a skinny, anorexic, Edina from Absolutely Fabulous. Both Ayn Rand and the Cross are simply fashion accessories. “La Croix, baybeee!”

    I never thought I could have more contempt for anyone than I do for Randian Objectivists. Then, I was introduced to the concept of Faux Randian Objectivists who don’t even understand what the vile woman was talking about but who claim to support her because she was anti-liberal.

    Also, from what I’ve read about Denise Joseph, my suspicious is that she was cheating on her husband of ten months with D’Souza in the hopes that he could introduce her to Newt Gingrich, who is wealthier, more famous and probably looking to trade again.

  58. 58.

    Woodrowfan

    October 20, 2012 at 9:49 am

    Therefore, they wish to destroy this country and replace it with some nightmare out of the pages of Margaret Atwood.

    I do wish people would stop writing novels about right-wing distopias. The righties see them not as warnings but as instruction manuals.

  59. 59.

    Steeplejack

    October 20, 2012 at 9:50 am

    @hamletta:

    That appears to have been debunked:

    This story originally reported that D’Souza’s salary was rumored to be $1 million. According to the most recent IRS filings by the King’s College, D’Souza received $194,638 in reportable compensation between August 16, 2010, and August 31, 2011, and an estimated additional compensation of $6,886. The reference to the rumored salary has been removed.

  60. 60.

    Cervantes

    October 20, 2012 at 9:58 am

    Via freelancer, Alex O’Hehir:

    Being born an Indian Catholic was evidently not weird enough;

    What is that supposed to mean? There’ve been Christians in India for two thousand years.

    Eviscerate D’Souza without making your own ignorance too obvious.

  61. 61.

    gelfling545

    October 20, 2012 at 10:06 am

    @Anne Laurie: And if he were going by the example set by other prominent conservative “christians” he could assume that there was some tacit permission to do just as he has done; maybe even assume it was required to rise to high national position.

  62. 62.

    Cervantes

    October 20, 2012 at 10:06 am

    @Walker: He did not bring the donors in; the board did.

  63. 63.

    BC

    October 20, 2012 at 10:07 am

    @Villago Delenda Est: He’s safe from the stoning. The fiancee, however . . .

  64. 64.

    PurpleGirl

    October 20, 2012 at 10:30 am

    @Cervantes: Ah, but one of the jobs of a university/college president is to bring in donors and to keep up relationships with current donors. If he had done this, his position would have been more secure. Fund raising is part of almost every top executive’s job.

  65. 65.

    dance around in your bones

    October 20, 2012 at 10:42 am

    @Origuy:

    I don’t know where I would have ever heard about this except on Balloon Juice. Bagpipes, flamenco guitar and dancing, and the woman is HOT.

    Thanks.

  66. 66.

    BillCinSD

    October 20, 2012 at 10:44 am

    @Cervantes: Christian hasn’t equaled Catholic since at least the Reformation. India’s Catholic population is less than 4% of the total population, so it is pretty rare — about on par with the fraction of LDS in the US

  67. 67.

    Linda

    October 20, 2012 at 10:57 am

    I call bull$hit on D’Sleaza. He could not have grown up Catholic and not known that the Church frowns on adultery and fornication. Maybe that is why he left, seeking the cheap grace that some evangelical Protestant teaching offers?

    When I saw the picture of D’Enise, I honestly thought she was a man in drag, and, given that D’Souza is a professional conservative,thus a hypocrite, and that he has fulminated against homosexuality for years, I wasn’t surprised. However, other pictures that have appeared as the story spreads make it appear that she is indeed female.

  68. 68.

    bjacques

    October 20, 2012 at 11:01 am

    We’re up to our ears in gloaters here!!

  69. 69.

    PurpleGirl

    October 20, 2012 at 11:11 am

    @bjacques: Why not? The man has said some absolutely vile things about the President and his mother. He is a moral scold of the first degree. His life principle, by his actions, is do as I say, not as I do. If he is being punished, it is because of his own actions.

  70. 70.

    Keith

    October 20, 2012 at 11:15 am

    I wonder if Ms. Joseph has gotten her “Congratulations, you have chlamydia!” email from Ann Coulter yet.

  71. 71.

    Linda

    October 20, 2012 at 11:26 am

    Hi bjacques, for me it’s more like disgust. Not only is the man a creep, he’s a stupid creep who has apparently been festering in the body politic for at least 30 years. Jerks like him helped destroy America.

  72. 72.

    Tommy D

    October 20, 2012 at 11:27 am

    For the record, ‘petard’ is a fart. ‘Hoist on yr own petard’ is to blow yourself up with your own gas. You can look it up. Isn’t that wonderful?

  73. 73.

    Xecky Gilchrist

    October 20, 2012 at 11:33 am

    doesn’t this whole situation fit the basic definition of karma?

    Yes, but among Conservative moral scolds, it also fits the basic definition of “Thursday.”

  74. 74.

    Frankensteinbeck

    October 20, 2012 at 11:34 am

    @Tommy D:
    A ‘petard’ is a small bomb made of gunpowder from the early Renaissance. To be ‘hoist on your own petard’ is to blow yourself into the air with it.

  75. 75.

    Xecky Gilchrist

    October 20, 2012 at 11:35 am

    @Tommy D: I had read that the usage came from a type of bomb that soldiers nicknamed “petard” because it was like a loud fart, and to hoist oneself on one’s own petard was to screw up and allow it to detonate near you.

    (pardon, I type too slow. Frankensteinbeck ftw.)

  76. 76.

    scav

    October 20, 2012 at 11:37 am

    @Frankensteinbeck: just looked it up and it looks like the little bombs were named after farts, but the hoisting part does involve the blast powder that isn’t internally generated.

    Eta clearly a topic of general interest! And who wouldn’t name little bombs after farts?

  77. 77.

    Tommy D

    October 20, 2012 at 11:43 am

    @Frankensteinbeck: Phrase comes from Hamlet and is a pun based on the French word ‘peter’ which means fart. Yr definition is derivative.

  78. 78.

    delosgatos

    October 20, 2012 at 11:46 am

    @burnspbesq:

    Lautesschadenfreude?

  79. 79.

    LemonSky

    October 20, 2012 at 11:52 am

    So he’s into blondes, eh?

    Then I look forward to Dinesh’s next book “Chutney’s Complaint”.

  80. 80.

    scav

    October 20, 2012 at 11:54 am

    @delosgatos: Sounds like something you could order at Starbucks. We’ll get burnsie a skinny decaf and provide the doubles with whipped cream to those that will relish them properly.

  81. 81.

    gocart mozart

    October 20, 2012 at 11:57 am

    If I had only known that that sort of behavior was fround on in this establisment . . .

    youtube.com/watch?v=-RvNS7JfcMM

  82. 82.

    Rafer Janders

    October 20, 2012 at 12:16 pm

    I had no idea that it is considered wrong in Christian circles to be engaged prior to being divorced, even though in a state of separation and in divorce proceedings. Obviously I would not have introduced Denise as my fiancé at a Christian apologetics conference if I had thought or known I was doing something wrong. But as a result of all this, and to avoid even the appearance of impropriety, Denise and I have decided to suspend our engagement.

    Um…um forget being “engaged prior to being divorced”, didn’t he have any idea that it’s considered wrong in Christian circles to get divorced in the first place, or to have an affair while married?

    This is rather like writing “I had no idea that it is considered wrong in Christian circles to pop amyl nitrate prior to engaging in gay orgies”: by thinking that it’s the amyl nitrate that matters, may be focusing on the wrong thing…..

  83. 83.

    Yutsano

    October 20, 2012 at 12:21 pm

    @TheMightyTrowel: Heh. They mention Seamus. Are all Aussie rags that cool?

  84. 84.

    Ruckus

    October 20, 2012 at 12:29 pm

    @Haydnseek:

    Thanks!

    Of course I have to be careful of laughter at that level to guard against another heart attack.

  85. 85.

    West of the Rockies (formerly Frank W.)

    October 20, 2012 at 1:08 pm

    How did this lumpy turd get that close to multiple fairly attractive women(well, except for Coulter, of course)? I can’t imagine that most women would regard that as an especially kissable mouth. Ick….

    Oh, but I am lovin’ the public disgrace and financial hit D’idiot is taking!

  86. 86.

    quannlace

    October 20, 2012 at 1:27 pm

    People wouln’t be playing the world’s smallest violin if Dinesh had shown a nano second of the same consideration for his victims. But that would take a certain emotional maturity.
    Which isn’t evident from his ‘nothing happened’ comment. That’s what a sixteen year old says when his Mom finds his girlfriend’s bra in his bedroom.

  87. 87.

    Kerry Reid

    October 20, 2012 at 1:36 pm

    The very fact that he is DIVORCING in the first place shows that he is bent on tearing apart the fabric of society! How long will we allow these hetero-divorcing monsters to destroy the very building blocks of our culture? Jailing is too good for ’em! Stone them, I say!

  88. 88.

    Cervantes

    October 20, 2012 at 1:52 pm

    @BillCinSD: India’s Catholic population is less than 4% of the total population, so it is pretty rare—about on par with the fraction of LDS in the US

    Let me put it to you this way. Jews are about 2-3% of the US population. If Alex O’Hehir were to write the following about someone: “Being born an American Jew was evidently not weird enough …” what would you say? Or do you think American Jews are somehow more “weird” than Indian Catholics?

  89. 89.

    Chris

    October 20, 2012 at 2:15 pm

    @quannlace:

    People wouln’t be playing the world’s smallest violin if Dinesh had shown a nano second of the same consideration for his victims.

    This.

    No, Dinesh didn’t deserve to be fired because of his personal life. But then, those gay kids at the university he went to didn’t deserve to be yanked out of the closet at a time when that was still far more of a life ruiner than it is today. And that’s not even the tip of the iceberg when it comes to people whose lives have been ruined by the religious right, whom Dinesh has made a career supporting.

    Live by the sword, die by the sword. I have no more sympathy for him than I would have had when Robespierre and Marat finally died of their own medicine.

  90. 90.

    Matt McIrvin

    October 20, 2012 at 3:09 pm

    @scav: Yep. “Petard” literally means “farter”. It was the ancestor of the shaped charge; it had a casing shaped like a bell, and you’d attach the open end to a fortress gate, light the fuse, and if you were lucky you would get away before it blew you up too.

  91. 91.

    Tehanu

    October 20, 2012 at 6:01 pm

    @Matt McIrvin:
    So D’inesh is the LePetomane of today’s rightwing?

  92. 92.

    Linda

    October 20, 2012 at 6:17 pm

    @Frankensteinbeck: Upon reflection, I believe it’s the skin problems that caused to mistake D’Enise for a D’Ude.

  93. 93.

    Linda

    October 20, 2012 at 6:20 pm

    Er, that caused me to mistake, etc. Mea culpa. (Dinesh, if you’re reading this, “Mea culpa” means “my fault.”)

  94. 94.

    Patricia Kayden

    October 20, 2012 at 6:52 pm

    “Instead, here is a clear attempt to destroy my career and my ministry”

    What ministry is D’Souza referencing? The only thing I know about him is that he is a philandering, racist, homophobic hypocrite. Hopefully, now that the Christianists have rejected him, we don’t have to hear from him again. He can go off into the sunset with his second Mistress (after she divorces her husband) and leave us alone.

  95. 95.

    Cervantes

    October 20, 2012 at 7:07 pm

    @Linda: (Dinesh, if you’re reading this, “Mea culpa” means “my fault.”)

    Oh, very good. Very, very good.

  96. 96.

    West of the Rockies (formerly Frank W.)

    October 20, 2012 at 8:34 pm

    Okay,I know this is sort of juvenile and doesn’t really comment on the character of this character-less grifter, but he looks like a really ugly baby trying to nurse.

    Put him up there with Donald Trump for really grotesque men who manage to hook up with much more attractive women. The guy is a toad.

  97. 97.

    bob h

    October 21, 2012 at 6:35 am

    I’ve wondered about the politics of South Asian (Indian) Americans. You look at this guy and Ranesh P., and wonder whether there is not some predilection among them for Republicans.

  98. 98.

    Paul in KY

    October 22, 2012 at 11:06 am

    @burnspbesq: You are such a wet blanket. Jeezus, this is Dinesh Freaking D’Souza we’re talking about.

    Derisive laughter is mandatory here (at least if you are agin his worldview).

  99. 99.

    Paul in KY

    October 22, 2012 at 11:12 am

    @Cervantes: They (Indian Catholics/Christians) are .0001% of population, right?

    Edit: Someone up above mentioned they are 4% of population (a much more sizable figure than mine). If the 4% is true, I can see where Cervantes was going with his/her comment.

Comments are closed.

Primary Sidebar

On The Road - 🐾BillinGlendaleCA - The Aurora and the Comet 1
Image by BillinGlendaleCA (12/12/25)

2026 Pets of Balloon Juice Calendar

PLEASE REVIEW YOUR INFO ASAP

Recent Comments

  • rikyrah on Two Sides To Every Story (Dec 12, 2025 @ 2:06pm)
  • Matt McIrvin on TGIFriday Morning Open Thread (Dec 12, 2025 @ 2:06pm)
  • Princess on Two Sides To Every Story (Dec 12, 2025 @ 2:05pm)
  • HopefullynotCassandra on Two Sides To Every Story (Dec 12, 2025 @ 2:04pm)
  • Baud on Two Sides To Every Story (Dec 12, 2025 @ 2:04pm)

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
On Artificial Intelligence (7-part series)

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)
Fix Nyms with Apostrophes

Balloon Juice Mailing List Signup

Social Media

Balloon Juice
WaterGirl
TaMara
John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
David Anderson
Major Major Major Major
DougJ NYT Pitchbot
mistermix
Rose Judson (podcast)

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Privacy Manager

Copyright © 2025 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!