• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

Wow, I can’t imagine what it was like to comment in morse code.

Putting aside our relentless self-interest because the moral imperative is crystal clear.

Republicans are the party of chaos and catastrophe.

Since we are repeating ourselves, let me just say fuck that.

They are lying in pursuit of an agenda.

Radicalized white males who support Trump are pitching a tent in the abyss.

Trumpflation is an intolerable hardship for every American, and it’s Trump’s fault.

Stamping your little feets and demanding that they see how important you are? Not working anymore.

Speaker Mike Johnson is a vile traitor to the House and the Constitution.

The words do not have to be perfect.

The truth is, these are not very bright guys, and things got out of hand.

These days, even the boring Republicans are nuts.

Dear media: perhaps we ought to let Donald Trump speak for himself!

Anne Laurie is a fucking hero in so many ways. ~ Betty Cracker

People are weird.

Within six months Twitter will be fully self-driving.

One way or another, he’s a liar.

Disagreements are healthy; personal attacks are not.

The current Supreme Court is a dangerous, rogue court.

I’m starting to think Jesus may have made a mistake saving people with no questions asked.

Motto for the House: Flip 5 and lose none.

The arc of the moral universe does not bend itself. it is up to us to bend it.

It is not hopeless, and we are not helpless.

Republicans got rid of McCarthy. Democrats chose not to save him.

Mobile Menu

  • Seattle Meet-up Post
  • 2025 Activism
  • Targeted Political Fundraising
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • COVID-19
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • 2025 Activism
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • Targeted Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Motion of the ocean

Motion of the ocean

by DougJ|  January 15, 201310:29 am| 67 Comments

This post is in: Our Failed Media Experiment

FacebookTweetEmail

The very serious Atlantic magazine is now running paid “advertorials” for Scientology.

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « The Topic That Never Ends
Next Post: Hugs All Around »

Reader Interactions

67Comments

  1. 1.

    Forum Transmitted Disease

    January 15, 2013 at 10:38 am

    The very serious Atlantic magazine is now running paid “advertorials” for Scientology.

    The equivalent of the death rattle in the publishing world.

  2. 2.

    Rathskeller

    January 15, 2013 at 10:40 am

    Currently yanked. http://m.theatlantic.com/misc/notice/

    here’s an important new story about Scientology, though, from the Tampa Bay Times.

  3. 3.

    Gin & Tonic

    January 15, 2013 at 10:43 am

    Gotta pay the rent, dude.

  4. 4.

    NotMax

    January 15, 2013 at 10:43 am

    This was beaten to death in an earlier thread.

    My engrams hurt.

  5. 5.

    proverbialleadballoon

    January 15, 2013 at 10:44 am

    Sleazy.

  6. 6.

    Napoleon

    January 15, 2013 at 10:45 am

    “Native Ads” – what the hell does that even made and how is it differant then “Ads”?

  7. 7.

    legion

    January 15, 2013 at 10:45 am

    As if their support of McMegan didn’t already signal their moral and intellectual bankruptcy…

  8. 8.

    R-Jud

    January 15, 2013 at 10:46 am

    @NotMax:

    My engrams hurt.

    Not very upstat, huh? You need more auditing.

  9. 9.

    Zifnab

    January 15, 2013 at 10:49 am

    Is this really any worse than advertising for LDS or Catholicism? Yeah, Scientology is bad, but it really isn’t much worse than anything else. Take their money.

  10. 10.

    NotMax

    January 15, 2013 at 10:49 am

    @R-JudTouché

    :·)

  11. 11.

    Suffern ACE

    January 15, 2013 at 10:50 am

    Never quite understood why they don’t just buy their own outlet. I mean, all they’d have to do to be respectable is declare a hatred of communism and demand a need for reducing unfunded mandates and they’d be welcome at the table. Especially if they were known to hire writers and pay them on time.

  12. 12.

    Rathskeller

    January 15, 2013 at 10:52 am

    @Zifnab: No, you are quite mistaken. Scientology is much closer to organized crime than LDS or the Catholic Church. They systematically attempt to get around laws in every country, they bully people with a ferocity that can scarcely be believed, and they fleece innocents of money.

    In contrast, if you want to be in the LDS or Catholic Church, eh, grab a pew. Someone will be by at some point to talk and it’s free if you choose.

  13. 13.

    Emma

    January 15, 2013 at 10:53 am

    @Zifnab: It was written as a story. It allowed comments, most of which were rather laudatory until negative comments began to be “up’ed”, at which point comments were turned off. Then they yanked the whole thing after other news outlets started pointing out it was propaganda.

    They stepped in it up to their shins.

    (edited to make it clear. need another cup of coffee)

  14. 14.

    NotMax

    January 15, 2013 at 10:55 am

    @Rathskeller

    They systematically attempt to get around laws in every country, they bully people with a ferocity that can scarcely be believed, and they fleece innocents of money.

    Isn’t that also the M.O. of every high-powered Wall Street firm?

  15. 15.

    JPL

    January 15, 2013 at 11:01 am

    OT.. Please call Reid’s office on filibuster reform. That issue will come up in one week.
    A friend called and was referred to this videohttp://video.vegaspbs.org/video/2325544208/

    I haven’t listened to it yet but instead asked about his views on the filibuster and what reforms would he support. I mentioned the last gentlemen’s agreement with McConnell and asked how that worked out. I mentioned that the filibuster might be an important tool for actual votes but they are filibustering the right to vote. You can do what you want but please call. (202-224-3542)

  16. 16.

    Cassidy

    January 15, 2013 at 11:05 am

    @Rathskeller:

    They systematically attempt to get around laws in every country, they bully people with a ferocity that can scarcely be believed, and they fleece innocents of money.

    In contrast, if you want to be in the LDS or Catholic Church, eh, grab a pew. Someone will be by at some point to talk and it’s free if you choose.

    Is today ironic humor day? Did I miss a memo?

  17. 17.

    Villago Delenda Est

    January 15, 2013 at 11:05 am

    @Rathskeller:

    The LDS church and Catholicism are not very far from organized crime, themselves.

    It’s not for nothing I call LDS the Scientology of the 19th Century.

  18. 18.

    Amir Khalid

    January 15, 2013 at 11:05 am

    Advertorials are a very bad idea. They’re paid for like advertising, but the publication dresses them up to look, at a glance, like regular editorial content to the reader. This borders on deception.

    There is supposed to be a bright line between ads and editorial content. Advertorials blur that line and compromise credibility for the sake of revenues. The Atlantic Monthly should conclude its review by swearing off advertorials.

  19. 19.

    Machine-Gun Preacher (formerly Ben Franklin)

    January 15, 2013 at 11:07 am

    Overall, the Atlantic is a fine periodical. If the Editorial Staff could countermand the Bean-Counters (which department has effectively taken control of all corporations in the last 20 years). they would. This is not in their control.

    Wouldn’t this be the metaphor for the Obama Admin and Congress, or should we blame the President for errors and omissions from legislation?

  20. 20.

    redshirt

    January 15, 2013 at 11:09 am

    Amazing that a religion created as a joke bet is now treated semi-seriously. We humans have a ways to grow.

  21. 21.

    Roger Moore

    January 15, 2013 at 11:09 am

    @Zifnab:

    Is this really any worse than advertising for LDS or Catholicism?

    No, but I’d be just as upset with any ad like this one. It isn’t about Scientology, it’s about disguising advertising as editorial content, which is clearly not OK.

  22. 22.

    Rathskeller

    January 15, 2013 at 11:09 am

    @NotMax: No. Scientology is really in a different category from other institutions. If you really piss off Goldman Sachs, you might be across the table from three lawyers. Money might be sued for and won. Whatever.

    But do Wall Street firms kill people’s dogs or phone in death threats? Would they send people to your house every day? Would you expect them to infiltrate government agencies in order to destroy documents and alter policy (as they did with the IRS). The Scientology folks are deeply wrong and bad.

    Which in turn makes The Atlantic seem especially craven here. This isn’t one of those Republic of Saudi Arabia ads where they talk to potential business partners. Gross but ultimately not very important. In contrast, the “Church” of Scientology craves acceptability, and The Atlantic helped them along that road.

  23. 23.

    sharl

    January 15, 2013 at 11:10 am

    Boing-Boing had some fun with this (apologies if someone beat me to this in earlier comments).

  24. 24.

    Roger Moore

    January 15, 2013 at 11:10 am

    @NotMax:

    Isn’t that also the M.O. of every high-powered Wall Street firm?

    And we clearly love big Wall Street firms around here so much that we wish teh ghey would finish destroying traditional marriage to the point that it would be legal to marry a corporation.

  25. 25.

    BruinKid

    January 15, 2013 at 11:12 am

    Oh gawd, the man who helped those six children at Sandy Hook is now getting harassed by phone and e-mail, with some of them coming close to being death threats, by the Sandy Hook “truthers” who think the massacre never happened.

    I’m generally a pacifist, but when they’re THIS much of an asshole to people who don’t deserve it, I may have to wish bad things happen to sociopaths like that.

  26. 26.

    Alex S.

    January 15, 2013 at 11:13 am

    @Roger Moore:

    I’d marry a hot mess like Walmart.

  27. 27.

    Rathskeller

    January 15, 2013 at 11:14 am

    @Cassidy: Sorry, I don’t get it. You don’t have to pay to be in the Catholic or LDS church. Bible’s free, online, etc. They may want you to donate, but it’s not a requirement. (I understand the LDS social pressure to tithe is actually quite intense, but still technically your choice.)

    In contrast, you do have to pay, in the tens of thousands of dollars, in order to be an active member in Scientology and to even be able to read their doctrines. No money, no advancing in the church.

  28. 28.

    Cassidy

    January 15, 2013 at 11:20 am

    @Rathskeller: Okay. Not going to get into a big debate over it. IMO, you just described the actions of any major organized religion, especially here in the US. The protestant/ evangelical Christion tradition here in the US is every bit as bullying, greedy, fleecing, and actively doing whatever they can to circumvent the laws of this country. The catholics are not far behind. They were the old guard, but are now trying to play catch up in a modern world. The LDS does the same thing and requires their members to tithe a significant amount of money. But Scientology uses flashing lights so they’re wierd?

  29. 29.

    Epicurus

    January 15, 2013 at 11:20 am

    In all fairness (despite their continued inexplicable employment of McArdle), the magazine seems to have changed their mind about this whole thing. (See update.) http://tbogg.firedoglake.com/2013/01/14/we-are-thetans-in-the-material-world/

  30. 30.

    Maude

    January 15, 2013 at 11:21 am

    @Amir Khalid:
    The problem is that The Atlantic did this in the first place. It shows poor judgement. The credibility of the magazine is damaged and that won’t go away.
    It also hurts the good writers there. They could be seen as guilty by association.

  31. 31.

    JPL

    January 15, 2013 at 11:22 am

    @BruinKid: I saw that earlier. Hopefully the parents who lost children during the massacre are prepared for the crazies. A professor from FAU has written extensively about his crackpot ideas. Did you know some parents don’t cry enough in public? If the whackos shed their own blood, I would not mourn.

  32. 32.

    schrodinger's cat

    January 15, 2013 at 11:24 am

    Isn’t this the same magazine that gave Megan McCardle a platform? An Econ blogger who can’t do simple arithmetic? And hosts the self important and self satisfied Aspen Ideas festival? They had no credibility to lose.

  33. 33.

    Villago Delenda Est

    January 15, 2013 at 11:24 am

    @redshirt:

    Hey, there’s money in the grift. Of course it’s taken semi-seriously. There’s green to be had.

  34. 34.

    Comrade Jake

    January 15, 2013 at 11:27 am

    I got into a back and forth with a Politico writer about this on Twitter last night. He didn’t see what the big deal was.

    Politico is probably just upset they didn’t think of this first. After all, page hits!

  35. 35.

    Lev

    January 15, 2013 at 11:30 am

    I guess my comment about how happy I was about the CoS branch in Israel opening didn’t get through the filter. I only said that Tom Cruise would finally be able to share his views on psychiatry to an audience that would no doubt be thrilled to hear them…

  36. 36.

    Mike in NC

    January 15, 2013 at 11:36 am

    The Atlantic has been going downhill for years to the point where it’s now a refuge for neoconservatives and glibertarians. I cancelled my subscription.

  37. 37.

    Thor Heyerdahl

    January 15, 2013 at 11:36 am

    I walked by the former office of Scientology in Toronto (Yonge/Bloor), and found out that it had moved further downtown (Richmond Street West I believe).

    I thought to myself that this was not a coincidence…The Toronto International Film Festival used to have its nexus around Yonge & Bloor, however in the last couple years since the building of a new building it’s been rather close to where Scientology moved. I guess they wanted to be as convenient as possible for visiting clients.

  38. 38.

    J.W. Hamner

    January 15, 2013 at 11:45 am

    I’m surprised it was taken down honestly… do we think it was Scientology or The Atlantic that pulled the plug?

  39. 39.

    Amir Khalid

    January 15, 2013 at 11:46 am

    @Maude:
    Well, we don’t disagree on that; the Atlantic has certainly shot itself in the foot, and quite badly. Its best hope now is to try to live this down.

    Because they seek to make ads look like editorial content, I feel advertorials are fundamentally deceptive. Some news publications make it a policy not to run advertorials at all. Many that do run advertorials are careful to label them as such. But if an “advertorial” label is big enough to catch the casual reader’s eye, then it has defeated the effort to dress the advertorial up as editorial content, and thus the very purpose of advertorials.

    The best way to avoid this mess is to leave advertorials the hell alone.

  40. 40.

    Belafon (formerly anonevent)

    January 15, 2013 at 11:50 am

    Don’t knock Scientology. It really is the one true American religion:
    1. Parts fools and their money
    2. The wealthier you are, the more perks there are
    3. Being part of it automatically makes you better than everyone else.

  41. 41.

    Villago Delenda Est

    January 15, 2013 at 11:50 am

    @J.W. Hamner:

    Definitely The Atlantic pulled it.

    $cientology would never do such a thing.

  42. 42.

    redshirt

    January 15, 2013 at 11:52 am

    @Villago Delenda Est: No doubt. The motivation for most religions. It’s fascinating to watch in real time – what was once so nakedly apparent (Scientology is a complete joke and an obvious money grab) – has, over time, morphed into a semi-serious, established Religion.

    The same process happened with Mormonism, but that sect has the benefit of an additional 100 years over Scientology, so it seems more legit.

    Keep extrapolating on this theme and you’ll realize that all Religions are scams, and are made to seem legit simply through the accumulation of time.

    Too bad Zeus and the boys didn’t have better marketing people back in the day.

  43. 43.

    mdblanche

    January 15, 2013 at 11:53 am

    @Epicurus: So the Atlantic will not do the wrong thing if enough people yell at them loud enough? Well, at least that’s better than Congress.

  44. 44.

    Regnad Kcin

    January 15, 2013 at 11:55 am

    @redshirt: I thought the RC church was started in a fit of pique between Meletius and Jerome

  45. 45.

    Maude

    January 15, 2013 at 12:02 pm

    @Amir Khalid:
    We agree on that. The Atlantic should have known better.

  46. 46.

    Maude

    January 15, 2013 at 12:03 pm

    @BruinKid:
    The story is on Yahoo News. Evil people are all over the place.

  47. 47.

    LanceThruster

    January 15, 2013 at 12:23 pm

    How small is the fine print on Sea Org’s billion-year contract?

    Btw, whatever happened to the ruling on Scientology’s copyright on its material?

    IIRC, if the info was fiction, copyright applied, but if factual it was argued you can’t copyright knowledge of that type.

  48. 48.

    LanceThruster

    January 15, 2013 at 12:34 pm

    Thanks to the Ex-Scientology Kids for this great quote —

    The great blessings of mankind are within us and within our reach; but we shut our eyes, and like people in the dark, we fall foul upon the very thing we search for, without finding it.
    – Seneca

  49. 49.

    Suffern ACE

    January 15, 2013 at 12:35 pm

    I’d like to be able to comment on the ads posted online. They’d be newsier that way. So the next time I get an video ad that makes me wait 20 seconds to load and other 20 seconds to play before I can cancel it, I’d like to leave a message like “Your product sucks and you’re wasting my time.” Or “Use of this product killed my Aunt in a horrible way.” The fact that they decided to dress up the Scientology ad with a comment section with pre-written comments is the next step in advertising for the future.

  50. 50.

    Bubblegum Tate

    January 15, 2013 at 12:42 pm

    @Amir Khalid:

    Advertorials are a very bad idea.

    I have fought against them ferociously at every publication that has employed me. Sometimes I win, sometimes I lose, but my hatred of “advertorials” has never wavered. They’re complete horseshit.

  51. 51.

    Certified Mutant Enemy

    January 15, 2013 at 12:45 pm

    @Rathskeller:

    Scientology, how about that? You hold on to the tin cans and then this guy asks you a bunch of questions, and if you pay enough money you get to join the master race. How’s that for a religion?
    — Frank Zappa

  52. 52.

    LanceThruster

    January 15, 2013 at 12:46 pm

    @Suffern ACE:

    How do you feel about Editizing?

  53. 53.

    Amir Khalid

    January 15, 2013 at 12:50 pm

    @Suffern ACE:

    The fact that they decided to dress up the Scientology ad with a comment section with pre-written comments is the next step in advertising for the future.

    They faked a comment section? By the time I got a look at The Atlantic, they’d taken down the advertorial, so I didn’t see that. Well, that crosses the line, that does. It’s not in the ethically dubious territory of the advertorial anymore. This is outright deception of The Atlantic’s readers.

  54. 54.

    LanceThruster

    January 15, 2013 at 1:41 pm

    @Amir Khalid:

    They faked a comment section?

    Before joining, I couldn’t even spell “Scientology[tm],” now I are one! ~ LanceThruster (OT XII)

  55. 55.

    LanceThruster

    January 15, 2013 at 1:42 pm

    @Certified Mutant Enemy:

    xD

  56. 56.

    Barry

    January 15, 2013 at 1:55 pm

    @Suffern ACE: “Never quite understood why they don’t just buy their own outlet. I mean, all they’d have to do to be respectable is declare a hatred of communism and demand a need for reducing unfunded mandates and they’d be welcome at the table. Especially if they were known to hire writers and pay them on time. ”

    I assume that you’re referring to the Washington Times, the Moonie rag. And after Moon bought his way into respectability in The Village, it’s got to have gotten much easier.

    Actually, why doesn’t the CoS just buy the Atlantic?
    They’d only have to fire Fallows and Coates; the rest would fit right in. And they could invite Megan McArdle back.

  57. 57.

    Rathskeller

    January 15, 2013 at 2:00 pm

    @Cassidy: Please give a similar example from any organized religion that does things like kill dogs:

    http://www.buzzfeed.com/lamagazine/did-scientology-kill-my-dog

    I am an atheist going on 40 years now, and I have oh so many complaints about organized religion. I vividly remember when I once blurted out “fuck the pope!” near two Catholic friends who gave me a good-natured (but painful) pummeling. Nevertheless, I can still find deep veins of good inside nearly every religious organization, both in their actions and in their beliefs. I share common values, even if I don’t think their god exists.

    Not so with Scientology. I think they are dangerous criminals, from the top to the bottom. Their actions and beliefs are equally toxic.

  58. 58.

    trollhattan

    January 15, 2013 at 2:07 pm

    Was talking this morning to a friend who’s freezing at her office and thought she’d dig out her curling iron (at your desk?!?) and hold it to warm up. I challenged her to find a second iron and conduct free audits for her office mates. Had to explain the joke but now she’s going to try and find one and post a sign, ala Lucy van Pelt.

    Wish I worked in a fun office.

  59. 59.

    MikeJ

    January 15, 2013 at 2:09 pm

    @Amir Khalid:

    Because they seek to make ads look like editorial content, I feel advertorials are fundamentally deceptive.

    The use of third person pronouns is what really put it over the edge. The advertiser paid for the space, the advertiser wrote the copy, the advertiser picked all the pictures, yet the copy refers to the advertiser as if it were some other entity.

    Had they simply said, “hey we opened a bunch of churches this year and we think our leader is a pretty cool guy” I wouldn’t really have a problem with it. Of course if they did that the Atlantic might have a bigger problem in that people would still think they wrote copy and are actually part of the sponsor’s org.

  60. 60.

    trollhattan

    January 15, 2013 at 2:14 pm

    @BruinKid:

    Ughhhhh. It’s people like this who make me question renewing my humankind membership. I wonder whether the Taft teacher who talked the kid into surrendering his shotgun is going to be the next target? After all, he’s already a union thug, now he’s demonstrably anti-gun.

  61. 61.

    Cassidy

    January 15, 2013 at 3:50 pm

    @Rathskeller: You mean like supporting policies that cause the deaths of people here in the US or having homosexuals put to death in Africa? But dogs or something? I don’t know what your plan is here.

    And yes, fuck the pope and all the talibangelical grifter motherfuckers who have followed since.

  62. 62.

    AuroraD

    January 15, 2013 at 3:58 pm

    @Machine-Gun Preacher (formerly Ben Franklin): Er – you mean, the Atlantic used to be a fine periodical. I subscribed for about a bazillion years, but then all of a sudden they started publishing a series of horrible writers – not only the execrable McMegan, but also those two almost-interchangeable CamillePaglia Lite assholes, Caitlyn Flanagan and Sandra Tsing-Loh. After that, the downhill spiral was very steep indeed.

  63. 63.

    LanceThruster

    January 15, 2013 at 4:14 pm

    @Rathskeller:

    I was instructed to dummy up about my atheism in our company vanpool because it was making baby Jeebus cry (not far from literal truth…really).

    [sigh]

  64. 64.

    Machine-Gun Preacher (formerly Ben Franklin)

    January 15, 2013 at 4:27 pm

    @AuroraD:

    Well, their Entertainment desk is still excellent. :)

  65. 65.

    Rathskeller

    January 15, 2013 at 4:28 pm

    @Cassidy: sorry, but you’re apparently not even trying to understand, so there’s no point in communicating with you.

  66. 66.

    Rita R.

    January 15, 2013 at 4:49 pm

    @Napoleon:

    Native advertising is just the newest “techie” term for advertorial. I went to an online-focused media conference recently and that was THE buzzword repeated throughout the day ad nauseum, along with “advertising is content too.”

  67. 67.

    El Cid

    January 15, 2013 at 8:06 pm

    Maybe this partly explains the Onion’s “advertorial” regarding Taliban successes in 2012.

    SPONSORED: The Taliban Is A Vibrant And Thriving Political Movement

    KABUL — 2012 proved to be just another in a succession of landmark years for the Taliban, as the influential Islamic fundamentalist organization continued its awe-inspiring push toward unprecedented expansion.

    Even following a decade marked with some difficulties, the devoted members of the Afghani cultural and political movement have proven consistently successful in their trailblazing efforts to continue the Taliban’s constant recruiting of talented and diverse young insurgents and building its thriving base of support from politicians and citizens alike to over 30 times that of a decade ago.

Comments are closed.

Primary Sidebar

Image by WaterGirl (6/21/25)

Recent Comments

  • Another Scott on Late Night Open Thread: Compare & Contrast (Jun 21, 2025 @ 11:16am)
  • JoeyJoeJoe on Late Night Open Thread: Compare & Contrast (Jun 21, 2025 @ 11:15am)
  • Quiltingfool on Saturday Morning Open Thread (Jun 21, 2025 @ 11:14am)
  • Quiltingfool on Saturday Morning Open Thread (Jun 21, 2025 @ 11:13am)
  • Jackie on Saturday Morning Open Thread (Jun 21, 2025 @ 11:13am)

Personality Crisis Podcast (Cole, DougJ, mistermix)

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
No Kings Protests June 14 2025

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)
Fix Nyms with Apostrophes

Social Media

Balloon Juice
WaterGirl
TaMara
John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
David Anderson
Major Major Major Major
DougJ NYT Pitchbot
mistermix

Keeping Track

Legal Challenges (Lawfare)
Republicans Fleeing Town Halls (TPM)
21 Letters (to Borrow or Steal)
Search Donations from a Brand

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2025 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!