• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

Anyone who bans teaching American history has no right to shape America’s future.

Let me eat cake. The rest of you could stand to lose some weight, frankly.

Republicans don’t want a speaker to lead them; they want a hostage.

American history and black history cannot be separated.

The “burn-it-down” people are good with that until they become part of the kindling.

If you still can’t see these things even now, maybe politics isn’t your forte and you should stop writing about it.

Jack be nimble, jack be quick, hurry up and indict this prick.

Today’s gop: why go just far enough when too far is right there?

Peak wingnut was a lie.

This year has been the longest three days of putin’s life.

If you thought you’d already seen people saying the stupidest things possible on the internet, prepare yourselves.

Sadly, media malpractice has become standard practice.

We can show the world that autocracy can be defeated.

These days, even the boring Republicans are nuts.

“Just close your eyes and kiss the girl and go where the tilt-a-whirl takes you.” ~OzarkHillbilly

People really shouldn’t expect the government to help after they watched the GOP drown it in a bathtub.

When we show up, we win.

You cannot love your country only when you win.

Republicans firmly believe having an abortion is a very personal, very private decision between a woman and J.D. Vance.

The fight for our country is always worth it. ~Kamala Harris

fuckem (in honor of the late great efgoldman)

Fight them, without becoming them!

Baby steps, because the Republican Party is full of angry babies.

People are weird.

Mobile Menu

  • Seattle Meet-up Post
  • 2025 Activism
  • Targeted Political Fundraising
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • COVID-19
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • 2025 Activism
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • Targeted Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Science & Technology / On Fluorescent Fish, Pet Prosthetics, Roach Cyborgs, and the Ethics of Engineered Animals

On Fluorescent Fish, Pet Prosthetics, Roach Cyborgs, and the Ethics of Engineered Animals

by Tom Levenson|  March 20, 20133:59 pm| 49 Comments

This post is in: Science & Technology

FacebookTweetEmail

Program notes, here.  It’s the third Wednesday of the month, which means I’ll be talking to a guest on the Virtually Speaking Science Strand at Blog Talk Radio and in Second Life.

This month my interlocutor will be a first for me:  0ne of my former MIT Science Writing graduate students, Emily Anthes.  Emily is (a) great — a fine writer, a ferocious reporter, and someone with a sharp-elbowed, quirky view of the world.

She’s just out with a new book, Frankenstein’s Cat, on what’s happening now — and what the implications may be — in a range of ways we’ve begun to modify our pets and other animals.  The book treats of genetically modified fish that glow in the dark; dairy animals manipulated to produce therapeutically valuable proteins in their milk, the concept of editing the genomes of useful (and/or decorative) animals, cloning, brain hacking (that’s the roaches) and more.

Emily is an engaged reporter on all this; she has strong points of view.  Broadly, she favors the side of intervention; in part, as she notes, because it’s hardly as if the history of selective breeding leaves us exactly virginal in the matter of using our fellow creatures as means, rather than ends in themselves.

Joannes_Fijt_-_Spaniels_Stalking_Rabbits_in_the_Dunes_-_WGA08353

The question isn’t whether we should manipulate animals, but how, and with what ethical lens — and that’s what we’ll talk about.

We’ll do so both as a live and listen-later audio cast, and in front of a virtually (and virtuously, I hope) live audience in Second Life, tonight at 7 p.m. Eastern Daylight Time, 4 p.m on that far coast I used to call home.

Should be fun. Emily’s the real deal.  Listen in; buy her book; make an old teacher happy.

Image: Jan Fyt, Spaniels Stalking Rabbits in the Dunes, 1658

 

 

 

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « Afternoon Open Thread
Next Post: Fleeing the Interview (Open Thread) »

Reader Interactions

49Comments

  1. 1.

    Raven

    March 20, 2013 at 4:06 pm

    I was just talking with a friend about “The Life of Pi” and how much the fish, especially the dorado, that were shown we so real. I assume all the animals were computer generated but they seemed to have it right.

  2. 2.

    RoonieRoo

    March 20, 2013 at 4:08 pm

    My sister is a vet and I hear some stories. All I have to add is Neuticles!

  3. 3.

    Linnaeus

    March 20, 2013 at 4:09 pm

    In related news, the FDA just determined that there would be no significant impact from the approval of genetically engineered AquAdvantage salmon.

  4. 4.

    Johnny Coelacanth

    March 20, 2013 at 4:10 pm

    I happened to hear Amy interviewed on NPR last week. She took pains to point out that her subtitle was “Cuddling up to Biotech’s Brave New Beasts” and that “Frankenstein’s Cat” was supposed to be a more friendly image than Frankenstein’s monster. It was a good interview.

  5. 5.

    Tom Levenson

    March 20, 2013 at 4:10 pm

    @RoonieRoo: @Linnaeus:

    Both issues Emily talks about in the book. She doesn’t plan to acquire neuticles for her dog, btw.

  6. 6.

    srv

    March 20, 2013 at 4:11 pm

    Imagine if spiders flew AND glowed in the dark.

    That would be so awesome.

  7. 7.

    Persia

    March 20, 2013 at 4:13 pm

    @Johnny Coelacanth: I did too, and the book sounded great.

  8. 8.

    Linnaeus

    March 20, 2013 at 4:14 pm

    I’ll have to check this out; it’s an issue that I try to follow as closely as I can and I think a lot of the concerned parties aren’t doing a very good job of listening to each other. It’s frustrating.

  9. 9.

    LittlePig

    March 20, 2013 at 4:19 pm

    Tom, I don’t doubt she is a fine writer, but I couldn’t listen to her Fresh-Air interview because she has the annoying “Valley” tic of saying every other sentence like a question (with rising pitch and stress at the end of the sentence, interrogative or not).

    And I wanted to listen, partly because of the subject, and partly because I wanted to know if she had the Paul Terry Mighty Mouse cartoon of the same name partly in mind for the title. I’ll have to reconsider the book, which I assumed to be not so hot based on her presentation

  10. 10.

    RoonieRoo

    March 20, 2013 at 4:21 pm

    @Tom Levenson: I will definitely give a listen this evening.

  11. 11.

    Tom Levenson

    March 20, 2013 at 4:24 pm

    @LittlePig: Hell, she’s from NY! I’ll see if I can interrupt her often enough to throw her off her rhythm ;)

    Seriously though, when you’re dealing with a writer, check out the written word (hint, hint — and no I don’t get a cut).

  12. 12.

    Johnny Coelacanth

    March 20, 2013 at 4:25 pm

    @LittlePig: You seem to have a problem with upspeak? I’m not sure it’s just a Valley thing? I know people from West Virginia and they do that? Oh my God, it’s sooo annoying?

  13. 13.

    Linnaeus

    March 20, 2013 at 4:25 pm

    @Tom Levenson:

    I just found Emily’s article in which she favors approval of the AquAdvantage salmon. It’s a good argument, though I take issue with a few of the points she makes.

  14. 14.

    Mnemosyne

    March 20, 2013 at 4:32 pm

    @RoonieRoo:

    I’ve heard some speculation by vets that inserting something like that for male cats after neutering them could prevent the UTIs and urinary tract blockages that are so common in neutered male cats, but I don’t think any actual studies have been done.

  15. 15.

    Scamp Dog

    March 20, 2013 at 4:38 pm

    Those dogs aren’t stalking the rabbits, they’re lollygagging. The chest-on-ground, hips rolled over is the tell.

    Semi-kidding, but I’ve seen my dog looking hungrily at rabbits and pidgeons, and the dog in the painting is just too relaxed.

  16. 16.

    PurpleGirl

    March 20, 2013 at 4:46 pm

    @Johnny Coelacanth: Would you say the written on-line version of upspeak is to end a sentence with a question mark, even if the sentence is NOT a question being asked?

    I’m finding it annoying when people use question marks to end declarative sentences. Other peeves are ignorance of the differences and meanings of there, their, they’re, as well as to, too, two, etc.

    ETA: I am an old and I remember a lot of stuff I learned in primary school.

  17. 17.

    Amir Khalid

    March 20, 2013 at 4:50 pm

    @RoonieRoo:
    I saw the word “Neuticles”, and God help me, but for some reason I thought of Lance Armstrong.

  18. 18.

    grape_crush

    March 20, 2013 at 4:55 pm

    >…on what’s happening now — and what the implications may be — in a range of ways we’ve begun to modify our pets and other animals.

    Not to mention plants.

  19. 19.

    RoonieRoo

    March 20, 2013 at 4:57 pm

    @Mnemosyne: I’m seeing my sister this weekend. I’ll have to ask her if that is something she has heard.

  20. 20.

    grape_crush

    March 20, 2013 at 4:59 pm

    >The question isn’t whether we should manipulate animals, but how, and with what ethical lens…

    Should also mention what’s happened with our genetically-manipulated seedstock as well.

    The resulting loss of diversity from Monsanto’s dominance may restrict our ability to adapt plant stocks to an increasingly volatile climate. Many of the seed breeders and retailers Monsanto purchased were regional experts, familiar with the soil and adept at breeding crops suited to the vagaries of local pests and climate. That sprawling network of local knowledge and experimentation has been severely thinned.

  21. 21.

    RoonieRoo

    March 20, 2013 at 5:04 pm

    @Amir Khalid: That is hysterical.

  22. 22.

    The Moar You Know

    March 20, 2013 at 5:04 pm

    All I want to know is this: does science have anything on the horizon that can stop the large dogs I’m in the habit of owning from delivering paint-peeling farts of doom as I’m trying (and usually failing, these days) to drift off to sleep?

  23. 23.

    Amir Khalid

    March 20, 2013 at 5:11 pm

    @The Moar You Know:
    Butt plugs?

  24. 24.

    raven

    March 20, 2013 at 5:11 pm

    english teachers go home

  25. 25.

    ? Martin

    March 20, 2013 at 5:18 pm

    @The Moar You Know:

    All I want to know is this: does science have anything on the horizon that can stop the large dogs I’m in the habit of owning from delivering paint-peeling farts of doom as I’m trying (and usually failing, these days) to drift off to sleep?

    Door locks. Our corgi is resigned to the first floor. In part for the reason you describe. In part so the pocket pets have an unmolested place to live. In part because he looks like a fucking retard trying to go up and down the stairs on 2″ legs, and usually falls down the bottom half.

  26. 26.

    Tissue Thin Pseudonym (JMN)

    March 20, 2013 at 5:18 pm

    I want sharks with frickin’ lasers in their heads.

  27. 27.

    The Moar You Know

    March 20, 2013 at 5:19 pm

    @Amir Khalid: preferably something that will not traumatize/kill my dog, thanks.

  28. 28.

    ? Martin

    March 20, 2013 at 5:21 pm

    @PurpleGirl: I do two?

  29. 29.

    pete

    March 20, 2013 at 5:22 pm

    @Linnaeus: On the GM salmon, it would be good if more people read the report. My (hostile) summary is here. One of the things that most bothered me is that, to quote Michael Hansen of the Consumers Union, “FDA has allowed this fish to move forward based on tests of allergenicity of only six engineered fish, tests that actually did show an increase in allergy-causing potential.” I checked. He’s right. That’s just not good science.

  30. 30.

    jl

    March 20, 2013 at 5:28 pm

    Manimals. Tunch. I rest my case.
    SATSQ, you are welcome.
    Next question?

  31. 31.

    Roger Moore

    March 20, 2013 at 5:28 pm

    @Mnemosyne:
    I think the biggest benefit of neutricles is that they’ll help to convince squeamish men that it’s OK to get their male pets neutered. I guess there are some guys who are too sympathetic to their male pets and don’t recognize all the negative consequences of leaving them unfixed. If giving the pets prosthetic balls helps their humans to get over it, then I’m all in favor of prosthetics.

  32. 32.

    Yutsano

    March 20, 2013 at 5:28 pm

    I have to agree: puppehs in painting are being lazy not stalking.

    Atlantic salmon has been farmed for years now because the wild stocks are so horrifically depleted. Any messing with an already fragile gene pool would be horrific.

  33. 33.

    MaryRC

    March 20, 2013 at 5:30 pm

    a range of ways we’ve begun to modify our pets and other animals

    “Begun”? Haven’t we been modifying our pets and other animals for centuries? Why is this new?

  34. 34.

    Linnaeus

    March 20, 2013 at 5:30 pm

    @pete:

    Thanks for the link.

  35. 35.

    piratedan

    March 20, 2013 at 5:35 pm

    hard to believe were only a couple decades removed from Brin’s The Uplift Wars……

  36. 36.

    Maude

    March 20, 2013 at 5:42 pm

    @MaryRC:
    She must not have gone to a dog show.

  37. 37.

    keestadoll

    March 20, 2013 at 5:44 pm

    @MaryRC: Didn’t think I’d have to actually type this in here but selective breeding and genetic engineering/modification are not the same thing. Not same. As in two totally different things.

  38. 38.

    PurpleGirl

    March 20, 2013 at 5:52 pm

    @raven: I am not and never have been an English teacher; just someone who thinks that proper usage leads to a common language and understanding it.

  39. 39.

    Roger Moore

    March 20, 2013 at 5:52 pm

    @efgoldman:
    It’s only the Atlantic salmon that have been depleted that way. The Pacific Northwest salmon are still relatively healthy, especially the ones in Alaska. There are still some serious threats to their populations, but mostly from environmental damage inland rather than from overfishing.

  40. 40.

    raven

    March 20, 2013 at 6:23 pm

    @PurpleGirl: Feeling guilty there are ya?

  41. 41.

    jl

    March 20, 2013 at 6:24 pm

    Down with upspeak(?)

  42. 42.

    LittlePig

    March 20, 2013 at 6:36 pm

    @piratedan: hard to believe were only a couple decades removed from Brin’s The Uplift Wars……

    Hopefully we’ll skip the killer whale mods…

  43. 43.

    mclaren

    March 20, 2013 at 6:45 pm

    After reading some of the comments on this forum, you have to believe in the reality of roach cyborgs.

  44. 44.

    Chet

    March 20, 2013 at 6:54 pm

    @keestadoll:

    Didn’t think I’d have to actually type this in here but selective breeding and genetic engineering/modification are not the same thing.

    That’s only true if you’re a species essentiallist. Funny, though, I thought the last one had died out in the 19th century.

    DNA doesn’t come in “flavors.” HGT is just mutation by different means. And yes, my degree is in biochemistry and I work in genetics so I have a basis for saying so.

  45. 45.

    piratedan

    March 20, 2013 at 7:00 pm

    @LittlePig: yeah, but I can almost see the rise of rogue researchers because of the luddite GOP and the decline of state funded research. It’s as if these ninnies believe that we’ll continue to be in front of the rest of the world just because we have the most tanks. After the lessons not learned in Vietnam and Iraq and Afghanistan, these fuckers won’t be happy until they reintroduce Apartheid apparently.

  46. 46.

    MaryRC

    March 20, 2013 at 8:20 pm

    @keestadoll:Genetic engineering is a way to modify our pets and other animals, but selective breeding isn’t?

    @Maude: Or seen those miniature horses (which give me the creeps. If there’s any animal whom it seems wrong to shrink down to lap-dog size, it’s the horse).

  47. 47.

    Linnaeus

    March 20, 2013 at 8:55 pm

    @MaryRC:

    Genetic engineering is a way to modify our pets and other animals, but selective breeding isn’t?

    They both entail modification, but genetic engineering allows us to bypass the biological barriers that constrain “traditional” selective breeding.

  48. 48.

    I_D_Inuse

    March 20, 2013 at 9:35 pm

    Nomination for BEST POST (LINK) ON BALLOON JUICE

    http://www.neuticles.com/faq.php

    Win

  49. 49.

    Ted & Hellen

    March 20, 2013 at 11:57 pm

    Listen in; buy her book; make an old teacher happy.

    Grift

Comments are closed.

Primary Sidebar

Image by MomSense (5/10.25)

Recent Comments

  • New Deal democrat on Parsing the Pandemic Pause (May 21, 2025 @ 7:52am)
  • Ohio Mom on Parsing the Pandemic Pause (May 21, 2025 @ 7:52am)
  • Professor Bigfoot on Parsing the Pandemic Pause (May 21, 2025 @ 7:51am)
  • Baud on Parsing the Pandemic Pause (May 21, 2025 @ 7:49am)
  • Matt McIrvin on Parsing the Pandemic Pause (May 21, 2025 @ 7:49am)

PA Supreme Court At Risk

Donate

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
War in Ukraine
Donate to Razom for Ukraine

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

Meetups

Upcoming Ohio Meetup May 17
5/11 Post about the May 17 Ohio Meetup

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)
Fix Nyms with Apostrophes

Hands Off! – Denver, San Diego & Austin

Social Media

Balloon Juice
WaterGirl
TaMara
John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
David Anderson
Major Major Major Major
DougJ NYT Pitchbot
mistermix

Keeping Track

Legal Challenges (Lawfare)
Republicans Fleeing Town Halls (TPM)
21 Letters (to Borrow or Steal)
Search Donations from a Brand

PA Supreme Court At Risk

Donate

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2025 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!