• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

The poor and middle-class pay taxes, the rich pay accountants, the wealthy pay politicians.

Infrastructure week. at last.

Seems like a complicated subject, have you tried yelling at it?

Why is it so hard for them to condemn hate?

A snarling mass of vitriolic jackals

“Everybody’s entitled to be an idiot.”

A thin legal pretext to veneer over their personal religious and political desires

Accused of treason; bitches about the ratings. I am in awe.

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

Let me eat cake. The rest of you could stand to lose some weight, frankly.

Insiders who complain to politico: please report to the white house office of shut the fuck up.

If you tweet it in all caps, that makes it true!

The GOP couldn’t organize an orgy in a whorehouse with a fist full of 50s.

Our job is not to persuade republicans but to defeat them.

A democracy can’t function when people can’t distinguish facts from lies.

Schmidt just says fuck it, opens a tea shop.

Since when do we limit our critiques to things we could do better ourselves?

We are builders in a constant struggle with destroyers. let’s win this.

Prediction: the GOP will rethink its strategy of boycotting future committees.

… pundit janitors mopping up after the GOP

“Can i answer the question? No you can not!”

Too often we hand the biggest microphones to the cynics and the critics who delight in declaring failure.

The cruelty is the point; the law be damned.

Happy indictment week to all who celebrate!

Mobile Menu

  • Winnable House Races
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • Balloon Juice 2023 Pet Calendar (coming soon)
  • COVID-19 Coronavirus
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • War in Ukraine
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • 2021-22 Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Past Elections / Election 2014 / Johnson Out

Johnson Out

by $8 blue check mistermix|  March 26, 20139:18 am| 23 Comments

This post is in: Election 2014

FacebookTweetEmail

Senator Tim Johnson, D-SD, won’t seek re-election. Johnson suffered a brain hemorrhage in 2006 and has been partially paralyzed, with affected speech, since then. He won a landslide victory in 2008 after winning squeakers in his previous two Senate elections, mainly because the Republican didn’t want to get wrapped up in a dirty campaign against a guy in a wheelchair, so they ran a nobody with no money, Joel Dykstra.

This seat was already in serious play because Mike Rounds, the former governor, has announced his candidacy. Rounds stupidly signed an abortion ban in 2006, which was overturned, but otherwise he’s considered a decent, well-liked governor.

The only Democrat who has a chance of winning this seat is former Representative Stephanie Herseth-Sandlin, who makes most of you bluer than blue because she’s a Blue Dog who opposed Obamacare. That was stupid and it didn’t help her keep her seat in 2010, but she’s still pretty well-known and well-liked in the state. Being well-liked and “independent” is the only way a Democrat wins in the ultra-red state South Dakota has become. There’s some talk of Johnson’s son Brendan, who’s the US Attorney, running, but he’s not that well known and has never run for office.

Though this is an off-year election, turnout in South Dakota is way over the national average – 62% turned out in the 2010 race between Herseth-Sandlin and Palinesque Kristi Noem. Mike Rounds is no Rick Berg, the tea party idiot that Heidi Heidekamp beat in 2012’s North Dakota race. Even so, South Dakota is a relatively cheap media market, and money spent on this race goes a long way.  Given a choice between Herseth-Sandlin and Rounds, I’d vote for Stephanie once a day and twice on Sundays, even if she’ll end up being a Mary Landrieu or Claire McCaskill once she’s elected.

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « Murdering Hussy Obsession
Next Post: Not So Fast »

Reader Interactions

23Comments

  1. 1.

    cmorenc

    March 26, 2013 at 9:30 am

    If the dems can hold onto even a slimmed-down majority in the Senate in 2014, 2016 will likely find the dems on extremely favorable turf to more than make up for any 2014 losses as all those 2010 senate seats the GOP won will be coming up for reelection in a presidential high-turnout year. To keep the turf favorable, however the dems have to come up with a strong, attractive presidential candidate. Um…anyone know of one :=)? Can we please not try to shoot ourselves in a circular firing squad seeking to kill all but the purest progressive pony in the herd?

  2. 2.

    CarolDuhart2

    March 26, 2013 at 9:31 am

    Remember it’s a numbers game in Congress, folks. More Senators means Obama’s judges get through more easily. means we don’t have to worry about the Teatard House ideas becoming law. Yes, she’s Blue Dog, but sufficient numbers means her vote won’t be needed to pass more liberal laws.

  3. 3.

    Higgs Boson's Mate

    March 26, 2013 at 9:37 am

    Stephanie Herseth-Sandlin becomes a more attractive candidate when I consider the words, “Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell.”

  4. 4.

    TooManyJens

    March 26, 2013 at 9:52 am

    @CarolDuhart2:

    More Senators means Obama’s judges get through more easily.

    Only if we get past 60 or get some real filibuster reform. Sadly, I don’t think either looks likely. Which isn’t an argument for not supporting her; I’m just down this morning.

  5. 5.

    JPL

    March 26, 2013 at 9:53 am

    @Higgs Boson’s Mate: Well at least with McConnell, we won’t have that pesky filibuster problem. ugh

  6. 6.

    danielx

    March 26, 2013 at 9:56 am

    OT but…could use some good thoughts, as I’m off to the hospital where the daughter unit’s VP shunt is due to be revised today, possibly with a week of IV antibiotic therapy. She is not a happy camper, possibly less so than Mrs. X and your humble obedient. No trip to Harry Potter world for her and she’s highly pissed, not to mention scared and uncomfortable.

  7. 7.

    Just Some Fuckhead

    March 26, 2013 at 10:00 am

    Who names their boy Brenda with an “n” at the end?

  8. 8.

    Ash Can

    March 26, 2013 at 10:06 am

    @danielx: Here’s hoping all goes well.

  9. 9.

    JPL

    March 26, 2013 at 10:06 am

    @danielx: Good thoughts for all of you.

  10. 10.

    rikyrah

    March 26, 2013 at 10:07 am

    I understand this retirement. I’m glad he held on as long as he did.

  11. 11.

    rikyrah

    March 26, 2013 at 10:07 am

    @danielx:

    happy thoughts and prayers coming your way

  12. 12.

    falala

    March 26, 2013 at 10:19 am

    I iz worried about holding onto the Senate. Tis not looking good.

  13. 13.

    Andy

    March 26, 2013 at 10:23 am

    I was very disappointed by Herseth Sandlin’s Obamacare vote (I called her office beforehand), but I still voted for her over Noem. I’d gladly vote for her again against Rounds, though I’m sure she’d disappoint me on any number of issues in the future. It’s an easy calculation: some inevitable disappointment from a blue dog versus perpetual disagreement with a Republican.

  14. 14.

    The Moar You Know

    March 26, 2013 at 10:42 am

    I’m surprised we’ve held onto South Dakota this long. It’s going to take a monumental effort to keep it from flipping.

  15. 15.

    Omnes Omnibus

    March 26, 2013 at 10:46 am

    @Just Some Fuckhead: Tim Johnson.

  16. 16.

    Mnemosyne

    March 26, 2013 at 10:56 am

    @danielx:

    Ugh. Happy thoughts for all concerned!

  17. 17.

    low-tech cyclist

    March 26, 2013 at 11:34 am

    I’m happy to support Blue Dogs in states where that’s the best we can do, as long as they don’t get all prima-donna-ish about it and spoil the brand.

    When a Bob Kerrey or Joe Lieberman gets a big chunk of Dem camera time, people think what they stand for is what the Dems stand for, and GOP-lite doesn’t exactly turn out the voters.

  18. 18.

    burnspbesq

    March 26, 2013 at 11:40 am

    Given a choice between Herseth-Sandlin and Rounds, I’d vote for Stephanie once a day and twice on Sundays, even if she’ll end up being a Mary Landrieu or Claire McCaskill once she’s elected.

    Heresy! You will surely be burned at the stake for your lack of fidelity to the principles of progressive purity.

  19. 19.

    Yutsano

    March 26, 2013 at 11:40 am

    @danielx: Oh man. Hopefully the little one cruises through this. Kids are resilient things though.

    @burnspbesq: So why doesn’t Dr Jill Stein try to run for Senate there huh? PURITY UBER ALLES!!

  20. 20.

    Greg

    March 26, 2013 at 12:03 pm

    I hate you for getting my hopes up that Ron Johnson was resigning.

  21. 21.

    henrythefifth

    March 26, 2013 at 12:31 pm

    Does Herseth-Sandlin even live in the state any longer? Does that matter?

  22. 22.

    Gretchen

    March 26, 2013 at 12:50 pm

    I wish you east-coasters would quit hating on Claire McCaskill. If she were from Massachusetts, she’d be Elizabeth Warren’s right arm. But she’s not. Todd Akin was confidently expected to beat her easily until he started airing his thoughts about rape. She had Obama’s back on Obamacare. She was state auditor before she was Senator, and she’s still working to trying to rein in the big banks. She’s a hell of a lot better than Lieberman, and that takes a hell of a lot of courage in Missouri.

  23. 23.

    henqiguai

    March 26, 2013 at 5:49 pm

    Top

    …turnout in South Dakota is way over the national average – 62% turned out in the 2010 race…

    Well, that’s kind’a easy to do, when the entire state’s population is less than 840,000 (don’t LA and NYC have *neighborhoods* with almost that many people?), GOTV is a lot simpler.
    /snark

Comments are closed.

Primary Sidebar

Recent Comments

  • MattF on Repub Enablement Open Thread: The NYTimes Has *CONCERNS* (Apr 1, 2023 @ 2:09pm)
  • brantl on Repub Enablement Open Thread: The NYTimes Has *CONCERNS* (Apr 1, 2023 @ 2:08pm)
  • Rudi666 on Repub Enablement Open Thread: The NYTimes Has *CONCERNS* (Apr 1, 2023 @ 2:08pm)
  • Another Scott on Repub Enablement Open Thread: The NYTimes Has *CONCERNS* (Apr 1, 2023 @ 2:08pm)
  • Jim, Foolish Literalist on Repub Enablement Open Thread: The NYTimes Has *CONCERNS* (Apr 1, 2023 @ 2:03pm)

Balloon Juice Meetups!

All Meetups
Seattle Meetup coming up on April 4!

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

Fundraising 2023-24

Wis*Dems Supreme Court + SD-8

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
We All Need A Little Kindness
Classified Documents: A Primer
State & Local Elections Discussion

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Mailing List Signup
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)

Twitter / Spoutible

Balloon Juice (Spoutible)
WaterGirl (Spoutible)
TaMara (Spoutible)
John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
TaMara
David Anderson
Major Major Major Major
ActualCitizensUnited

Join the Fight!

Join the Fight Signup Form
All Join the Fight Posts

Balloon Juice Events

5/14  The Apocalypse
5/20  Home Away from Home
5/29  We’re Back, Baby
7/21  Merging!

Balloon Juice for Ukraine

Donate

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2023 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!