• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

rich, arrogant assholes who equate luck with genius

No offense, but this thread hasn’t been about you for quite a while.

So it was an October Surprise A Day, like an Advent calendar but for crime.

When someone says they “love freedom”, rest assured they don’t mean yours.

You can’t attract Republican voters. You can only out organize them.

Not all heroes wear capes.

You don’t get rid of your umbrella while it’s still raining.

I like you, you’re my kind of trouble.

Why is it so hard for them to condemn hate?

Only Democrats have agency, apparently.

We still have time to mess this up!

Take hopelessness and turn it into resilience.

It’s always darkest before the other shoe drops.

Come on, man.

Bark louder, little dog.

A lot of Dems talk about what the media tells them to talk about. Not helpful.

Their freedom requires your slavery.

I know this must be bad for Joe Biden, I just don’t know how.

if you can’t see it, then you are useless in the fight to stop it.

Peak wingnut was a lie.

If you’re pissed about Biden’s speech, he was talking about you.

Let me eat cake. The rest of you could stand to lose some weight, frankly.

Give the craziest people you know everything they want and hope they don’t ask for more? Great plan.

I didn’t have alien invasion on my 2023 BINGO card.

Mobile Menu

  • Winnable House Races
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • Balloon Juice 2023 Pet Calendar (coming soon)
  • COVID-19 Coronavirus
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • War in Ukraine
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • 2021-22 Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Civil Rights / LGBTQ Rights / Gay Rights are Human Rights / Early Morning Open Thread: Gaping…

Early Morning Open Thread: Gaping…

by Anne Laurie|  April 4, 20134:38 am| 46 Comments

This post is in: Gay Rights are Human Rights, Open Threads, Assholes

FacebookTweetEmail

homophobe bar(Matt Davies via GoComics.com)
.
Gonna trespass on DougJ’s turf to share Matt Taibbi regarding David Brooks’ latest, “one of the weirdest, most mean-spirited things I’ve ever seen in The New York Times”:

… The condescension is bad, but the argument is even worse. Brooks is trying to make a “point” here – he takes something like 800 words to make it, but it boils down to a single snarky observation: “Isn’t it ironic that these same people who’ve been fighting for the right to personal indulgence for all these decades since the Sixties are now fighting for the right to be legally restrained?”…

This whole same-sex marriage issue is much less about freedom than it is about justice. This is about a group of people wanting to be fully recognized as citizens, with absolutely equal rights, who among other things no longer want to subsidize the tax-advantaged marriages of straight people like Brooks. To even try to view this issue through the perils-of-permissive-society lens that Brooks has been obsessed with for years is incredibly insulting, but that’s exactly where he goes:

Americans may no longer have a vocabulary to explain why freedom should sometimes be constricted, but they like it when they see people trying to do it. Once Americans acknowledged gay people exist, then, of course, they wanted them enmeshed in webs of obligation.

Translated into human English, this passage would read something like this: “The reason same-sex marriage enjoys such inexplicably broad support now is because middle America wants to throw a net over gay culture, now that it’s been let out of its cage.”

And yet Brooks is still more logical, barely, than Louie Gohmert, defending his title as the Dumbest Republican Currently Holding Elective Office, who opposes any form of gun control because gay marriage leads to beastiality.

Maybe we should put these two men in a room together, somewhere they can share their unique insights with each other. And I vote we lock the door from the outside, just as a demonstration.

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « Later Night Open Thread
Next Post: Open Thread: Appalachian Trail! »

Reader Interactions

46Comments

  1. 1.

    Michael G

    April 4, 2013 at 4:47 am

    I say what the fuck, I’ll accept Brooks’ argument.

    In fact, let’s annul David Brooks’ marriage to increase his freedom.

  2. 2.

    Michael G

    April 4, 2013 at 4:54 am

    Actually reading Brooks’ column makes me think it’s a poorly executed April Fools joke.

  3. 3.

    Mustang Bobby

    April 4, 2013 at 4:54 am

    To quote myself (who better?): “Except that Mr. Brooks misses the larger point, which is that being denied the right to limit your own freedom is in itself a limitation on freedom. Straight couples have the right to choose to get married or not. They know going in that they may lose some of the freedoms that they had when they were single, but that’s a choice they get to make. Same-sex couples don’t have that choice.”

  4. 4.

    Amir Khalid

    April 4, 2013 at 4:58 am

    Maybe we should put these two men in a room together, somewhere they can share their unique insights with each other. And I vote we lock the door from the outside, just as a demonstration and then quietly walk away.

    There, that’s much better.

  5. 5.

    PeakVT

    April 4, 2013 at 5:14 am

    @Michael G: The NYT should free him of his obligation to produce in 800 words of bullshit two times per week.

  6. 6.

    Linda Featheringill

    April 4, 2013 at 5:54 am

    The fear that somewhere somebody is having a good time.

  7. 7.

    sm*t cl*de

    April 4, 2013 at 6:06 am

    It’s like rain on your same-sex wedding day.

    Americans […] like it when they see people trying to [constrict freedom]

    Really? Americans are fascists and authoritarians by nature? Citation needed.

  8. 8.

    Keith G

    April 4, 2013 at 6:11 am

    Brooks is a decoy (though he might not realize it himself).

    The issues for discussion should/must be:

    What do do about the Dems getting played on the sequester issue.

    How to handle the fact that implementation of universal healthcare is way behind schedule.

    Why meaningful nation wide gun regulation seems deader than a Sandy Hook first grader.

    Really now, Brooks is superfluous to these, and many more, issues. It seems that the forces of darkness have hit upon a working plan to make a second term Obama an irrelevant inconvenience. And they are not paying a price for their efforts.

  9. 9.

    WereBear

    April 4, 2013 at 6:16 am

    It’s a real struggle to formulate arguments against a human rights issue when the usual winking assumptions and prejudiced idiocies are no longer accepted.

    I believe Brooks’ head is so far up his ass he’s trying for a double header.

  10. 10.

    fuckwit

    April 4, 2013 at 6:29 am

    For some reason, the word “gaping” made me think of goatse.cx

  11. 11.

    amk

    April 4, 2013 at 6:39 am

    @Keith G: amen

  12. 12.

    JPL

    April 4, 2013 at 6:40 am

    David Brooks must have an interesting marriage since he had to give up all his freedoms. I didn’t realize that if DOMA is overturned, gays will be forced to get married.
    Linda Greenhouse’s column deals with equal protection and the Trojan Horse which is state’s rights. link

  13. 13.

    NotMax

    April 4, 2013 at 6:43 am

    leads to beastiality.

    It is spelled bestiality, not beastiality.

  14. 14.

    c u n d gulag

    April 4, 2013 at 6:48 am

    Is Brooks really, “straight?”

    I always suspected that Bobo is asexual.

    Any my proof that he is, is Ross Douthat.

    If that ain’t asexual reproduction, I don’t know what is!

  15. 15.

    Dan

    April 4, 2013 at 6:49 am

    It’s an 800 word version of that joke: I think people should be able to get married. Why should we be the only ones to suffer?

    See? The joke doesn’t require 800 words.

  16. 16.

    kdaug

    April 4, 2013 at 6:57 am

    You know, Anne Laurie, there are a lot of empty closets nowadays. With the right deadbolt…

  17. 17.

    NotMax

    April 4, 2013 at 7:07 am

    It truly does seem that the term “babbling brooks” was invented to describe David.

  18. 18.

    El Cid

    April 4, 2013 at 7:12 am

    How David Brooks can bear to get through life with all his extra-terrestrial superpowers of maximum willpower, deliberate restraint, and squinty-eyed thrift in a world full of us impulsive, profligate libertines is beyond me.

  19. 19.

    Baud

    April 4, 2013 at 7:13 am

    @Michael G:

    You could say that about every Brooks column.

  20. 20.

    PsiFighter37

    April 4, 2013 at 7:20 am

    @El Cid: I think if you spiked his drink at the holiday party, there’d be a lot of crazy shit going down, as he lets his inner freak flag fly.

  21. 21.

    Karmus

    April 4, 2013 at 7:30 am

    Just read the Taibbi piece. Excellent. Thanks for posting.

    Brooks sorely needs some of his freedoms restricted, methinks, say by the fence that encloses the pasture where he ought to be put out. Or maybe a nice padded cell would be more appropriate.

  22. 22.

    Kay

    April 4, 2013 at 7:34 am

    It’s probably a good sign. All he’s doing is making same sex marriage a conservative issue.

    David Brooks discovered, like he always does, that The Heartland is exactly like David Brooks.

    I think it’s hilarious that his entire professional career is a weird denial of…his entire professional career. He really and truly believes he is not an elite pundit who speaks exclusively to the same 250 people. He really and truly believes he is instead the voice of Main Street.

    My favorite column of his was when he went on a baseball travel trip with his son and found out that all of the people who stay at motels agree with him.

  23. 23.

    Donut

    April 4, 2013 at 7:45 am

    Maybe we should put these two men in a room together, somewhere they can share their unique insights with each other

    Doesn’t that sort of describe the wrenching stupidity and ignorance parade that has been unraveling in the GOP since Obama got elected in ’08?

  24. 24.

    sherparick

    April 4, 2013 at 7:49 am

    Brooks must have had an interesting adolescence during the 1970s (born in 1961, he was to young to remember much of the actual sixties) growing up in Stuy Town next the East Village. New York was a rather chaotic place, and was especially so in the 1970s, and I guess it scared the heck of poor David. This fear of chaos is one of the deep demi-urges of Conservatives, and if Brooks could have his druthers, I expect he would like to see the whole world go back to the feudal system, where everyone was born in their place and was kept in it.

  25. 25.

    kdaug

    April 4, 2013 at 7:50 am

    @Kay:

    My favorite column of his was when he went on a baseball travel trip with his son and found out that all of the people who stay at motels agree with him.

    At the Applebee’s salad bar.

  26. 26.

    Donut

    April 4, 2013 at 7:52 am

    @PsiFighter37:

    What would you spike him with?

    LSD or ecstasy?

    Each would produce radically different results.

  27. 27.

    Suffern ACE

    April 4, 2013 at 7:53 am

    Marriage? Marriage? What do those sodomites know about marriage? How could they know about it? No one ever has spoken about it out loud before, but it really sounds dreadful.

  28. 28.

    Donut

    April 4, 2013 at 7:55 am

    @Donut:

    The GOP’s dramas play out on cable news and on Teh Inter-tubes, the locked room of American political discourse, in other words.

  29. 29.

    SiubhanDuinne

    April 4, 2013 at 8:06 am

    @NotMax: Thanks for saving me the trouble of posting the identical comment.

  30. 30.

    Kay

    April 4, 2013 at 8:14 am

    @Keith G:

    There’s a hand-off that has to happen but often doesn’t with Democrats.

    Obama’s ideal for guns, because they’re trying to turn around an issue that’s been speeding in the other direction for years. Classic broad strokes advocacy.

    The sequester should have gone “Obama, then hand off to House Democrats”. They’re much better positioned than he is to talk about cuts in their districts.

    I see it again and again. It drives me crazy. If he tees up “sequester damage” for them in broad strokes for 3 months they then have to HIT IT.

  31. 31.

    Paul in KY

    April 4, 2013 at 9:11 am

    @Donut: Why not both? He could be an experiment.

  32. 32.

    Helen Bedd

    April 4, 2013 at 9:25 am

    “Isn’t it ironic that these same people who’ve been fighting for the right to personal indulgence for all these decades since the Sixties are now fighting for the right to be legally restrained?”

    And here I thought the argument was they “are now fighting for the right to be [legally] recognized….”

  33. 33.

    Keith G

    April 4, 2013 at 9:30 am

    @Kay: Indeed. I know that it’s very hard for the Democratic Party to actually act like a political party. The fact that the Republicans are uncharacteristically dissolving into disunity is of no comfort sense gridlock and disruption benefit their goals.

    These are serious times and this country desperately needs one of its political parties to step up to the plate and act like a governing party. This is a test of leadership and fair or not I don’t think history will be handing out any passing grades.

  34. 34.

    orogeny

    April 4, 2013 at 10:00 am

    I wonder how Mrs. Brooks feels about Dave’s description of their marriage as being “enmeshed in webs of obligation”?

  35. 35.

    Omnes Omnibus

    April 4, 2013 at 10:04 am

    How does a marriage restrain someone? If the person is going cheat, for example, the person would would cheat, married or not. And vice versa.

  36. 36.

    Gian

    April 4, 2013 at 10:15 am

    I have this theory… the more anti-gay marriage a right winger is, the more I think he opposes gay marriage because there will be fewer chances for hot wide stance airport events if gays are faithful to marriages.

  37. 37.

    kindness

    April 4, 2013 at 10:28 am

    Yeay! David Brooks keeps up saying things that would even embarass my Republican parents.

    I don’t think Brooks is going to create the hoped for groundswell he was looking for when he wrote this piece o’ crap. I suspect it’ll be the opposite.

    Guillotine yet?

  38. 38.

    bemused

    April 4, 2013 at 10:29 am

    @sherparick:

    What a prissy scold even though he is only 51 years old. I doubt he was ever tempted to sow any wild oats in his whole life or too scared to.

  39. 39.

    Mnemosyne

    April 4, 2013 at 11:09 am

    @Kay:

    For some reason, that reminded me of one of my all-time favorite Wodehouse quotes:

    The trouble with you, Spode, is that just because you have succeeded in inducing a handful of half-wits to disfigure the London scene by going about in black shorts, you think you’re someone. You hear them shouting “Heil, Spode!” and you imagine it is the Voice of the People. That is where you make your bloomer. What the Voice of the People is saying is: “Look at that frightful ass Spode swanking about in footer bags! Did you ever in your puff see such a perfect perisher?”

  40. 40.

    RaflW

    April 4, 2013 at 11:10 am

    @El Cid:

    squinty-eyed thrift

    Except for the $3mil mansionette, of course. But that’s just 1) a reflection of the crazy house prices in (the right parts of) D.C. and 2) an investment. Houses are investments that just happen to also have cozy inglenooks or double walk in closets or whatever it is that makes a house cost three mil.

  41. 41.

    RaflW

    April 4, 2013 at 11:19 am

    @Helen Bedd:

    Rereading that Brooks tidbit, I get even more pissed. Yeah, that pesky loving a person through and through, faults and all, good times and bad … it’s such a personal indulgence.

    Shut the fuck up, David Brooks. You are a first class asshole, even if you do occasionally have leather patches on your jacket elbows.

    The dripping condescension and sense that he knows the morality of other people’s lives better than they know their own, it’s vile and brings disrepute to the entire NYT venture.

  42. 42.

    Kay

    April 4, 2013 at 12:47 pm

    @Keith G:

    I just think they’re way off track, congressional Democrats. Obama’s a second term President. He wants immigration, I think, as a top priority, but it doesn’t really matter for the midterms and Congress what Obama wants or even gets.

    What are the priorities of the congressional Democrats? What are they planning on running on? They do best in midterms when they stick to practical issues, “pocketbook” issues, so…what are those? Do they want to advocate for a minimum wage increase? I know it’s unlikely to pass, but that’s not the point. He set it up for them and they followed up for a week or two and now I don’t even know where they are.

    If I am at a loss for words they are really in trouble :)

  43. 43.

    Captain C

    April 4, 2013 at 2:23 pm

    @Donut: I’d pay to see either.

  44. 44.

    Groucho48

    April 4, 2013 at 3:00 pm

    Isn’t this column pretty much a recapitulation of the Megan McMegan article that was mocked here a few days ago?

  45. 45.

    sm*t cl*de

    April 4, 2013 at 3:09 pm

    I am appalled that neither the original Brooks column, nor Taibbi’s flensing thereof, nor this post links to Devo. I thought that was obligatory.

  46. 46.

    gbear

    April 4, 2013 at 4:23 pm

    @orogeny: I was wondering the same thing. Must have been kind of a frosty evening (frostier than usual) after his wife read his argument about how much marriage stinks.

    I hope she made him sleep in the car.

Comments are closed.

Primary Sidebar

Fundraising 2023-24

Wis*Dems Supreme Court + SD-8

Recent Comments

  • sdhays on Squishable Early Morning Open Thread (Mar 28, 2023 @ 11:42am)
  • Xavier on Late Night Open Thread: Taxing Prep (Mar 28, 2023 @ 11:42am)
  • Soprano2 on American Has Turned Upside Down (Mar 28, 2023 @ 11:41am)
  • cope on Squishable Early Morning Open Thread (Mar 28, 2023 @ 11:38am)
  • cope on Squishable Early Morning Open Thread (Mar 28, 2023 @ 11:29am)

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
We All Need A Little Kindness
Classified Documents: A Primer
State & Local Elections Discussion

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Mailing List Signup
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)

Twitter / Spoutible

Balloon Juice (Spoutible)
WaterGirl (Spoutible)
TaMara (Spoutible)
John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
TaMara
David Anderson
Major Major Major Major
ActualCitizensUnited

Join the Fight!

Join the Fight Signup Form
All Join the Fight Posts

Balloon Juice Events

5/14  The Apocalypse
5/20  Home Away from Home
5/29  We’re Back, Baby
7/21  Merging!

Balloon Juice for Ukraine

Donate

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2023 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!