• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

Boeing: repeatedly making the case for high speed rail.

The line between political reporting and fan fiction continues to blur.

There are consequences to being an arrogant, sullen prick.

Today’s gop: why go just far enough when too far is right there?

There are no moderate republicans – only extremists and cowards.

Only Democrats have agency, apparently.

Republicans don’t want a speaker to lead them; they want a hostage.

Every one of the “Roberts Six” lied to get on the court.

Oppose, oppose, oppose. do not congratulate. this is not business as usual.

Within six months Twitter will be fully self-driving.

Their boy Ron is an empty plastic cup that will never know pudding.

The truth is, these are not very bright guys, and things got out of hand.

Make the republican party small enough to drown in a bathtub.

You know it’s bad when the Project 2025 people have to create training videos on “How To Be Normal”.

A norm that restrains only one side really is not a norm – it is a trap.

the 10% who apparently lack object permanence

Something needs to be done about our bogus SCOTUS.

The words do not have to be perfect.

He really is that stupid.

Republicans firmly believe having an abortion is a very personal, very private decision between a woman and J.D. Vance.

We need to vote them all out and restore sane Democratic government.

Never entrust democracy to any process that requires Republicans to act in good faith.

Black Jesus loves a paper trail.

“I was told there would be no fact checking.”

Mobile Menu

  • Seattle Meet-up Post
  • 2025 Activism
  • Targeted Political Fundraising
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • COVID-19
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • 2025 Activism
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • Targeted Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Civil Rights / Women's Rights / Women's Rights Are Human Rights / Good for NARAL

Good for NARAL

by Anne Laurie|  May 13, 20135:29 pm| 25 Comments

This post is in: Women's Rights Are Human Rights

FacebookTweetEmail

Dave Weigel:

The conservative campaign to shame the media into covering Kermit Gosnell’s murder trial was a success. It was only the Boston Marathon bombing, which happened the day media arrived for the abortionist’s trial in Philadelphia, that kept it from A1. But the verdict finally came in today—three counts of murder—and the first response I got was from NARAL President Ilyse Hogue.

Justice was served to Kermit Gosnell today and he will pay the price for the atrocities he committed. We hope that the lessons of the trial do not fade with the verdict. Anti-choice politicians, and their unrelenting efforts to deny women access to safe and legal abortion care, will only drive more women to back-alley butchers like Kermit Gosnell.

From the lack of funding available for low-income women to access abortion services, to the sharp decline of reputable providers in Pennsylvania, to the gross negligence of authorities to enforce the law after complaints were filed against Gosnell, each aspect of this case must be a teachable moment for lawmakers: until we reject the politicization of women’s medical care and leave these decisions where they belong — between a woman and her family and her doctor — women will never be safe. The horrifying story of Kermit Gosnell is a peek into the world before Roe v. Wade made legal a woman’s right to make her own choices.

We come full circle; it was the pro-choice movement that first wrote and talked about Gosnell, to pre-empt any sensationalism about the case. It was the pro-life movement, last month, that nudged the press into covering it again…

My emphasis. The anti-choice coalition wanted to use Gosnell as a weapon against women; I’m glad NARAL has been out there fighting the lies and misinterpretations.

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « Scandal!
Next Post: Game of Nesting Boxes (Open Thread) »

Reader Interactions

25Comments

  1. 1.

    grape_crush

    May 13, 2013 at 5:47 pm

    We come full circle; it was the pro-choice movement that first wrote and talked about Gosnell, to pre-empt any sensationalism about the case. It was the pro-life movement, last month, that nudged the press into covering it again…

    Actually, I didn’t hear about the Gosnell case at all until the anti-choicers made it into a rally cry.

    Is it fair to say now that we lefties aren’t the ones driving what the media picks up on, or do we have to go through a few more BENGHAZI! and IRS non-troversies for that to happen?

    If it ever happens, that is.

  2. 2.

    Villago Delenda Est

    May 13, 2013 at 5:55 pm

    I didn’t hear about it until the vermin of the MSM chose to pay attention to it because the forced birthers were screaming their diseased heads off about it.

  3. 3.

    piratedan

    May 13, 2013 at 5:57 pm

    @grape_crush: i’m afraid that the media has always had a less than favorable view of the left (at least as evidenced by the last few decades). They’re anti-union, anti-women (unless they’re being used to generate ratings) and anti-damnneareverything else as far as the left might be concerned (environment, military buildup, social rights, income inequity, etc etc etc). We talk about the cabal of folks like the Koch Brothers as being the source of all evil, for me it’s the decision makers in the media, who decide what is “newsworthy” and what the frame of the story should consist of.

    for evidence, just trot over to msn.com… the headline, “Abortion provider found guilty of murder”

  4. 4.

    MrSnrub

    May 13, 2013 at 6:07 pm

    I live in Philadelphia and I didn’t even hear about it until the story was foisted upon me.

  5. 5.

    Chris

    May 13, 2013 at 6:11 pm

    @grape_crush:

    I just find it interesting that this entire thing is being spun as “liberal media bias,” yet by all accounts Fox News and the rest of the conservative media were equally guilty of “covering up” (e.g. not discussing) this thing for the last two years.

  6. 6.

    Roger Moore

    May 13, 2013 at 6:16 pm

    @grape_crush:

    Actually, I didn’t hear about the Gosnell case at all until the anti-choicers made it into a rally cry.

    Which says more about what the press pays attention to than anything else. Pro-choice groups did their best to publicize what he did when the story first broke, but the national media let the story fade very quickly. It wasn’t until the anti-choicers made a big deal out of it (and he finally went to trial) that it got major media attention. Then the anti-choice crowd lied and claimed cover-up.

  7. 7.

    grape_crush

    May 13, 2013 at 6:22 pm

    @Chris: (e.g. not discussing)

    Either it wasn’t widely known or there was an effort not to talk about that topic in the runup to the elections.

    Now it just seems like the right throwing everything and the kitchen sink at the media to try to cover up for their lack of an agenda and failure to do anything resembling governance…just biding their time until the next Presidential election.

  8. 8.

    gvg

    May 13, 2013 at 6:30 pm

    I heard about it when it happened originally, here among other places. Then it faded from view and I didn’t see that as surprising as the verdict was very obvious, no suspense at all. The point it was very like pre Roe versus Wade was made-also obvious. Not really much to cover except gruesomness. It’s always kind of random which icky stories will get big coverage in the news. They can’t cover them all.

    There was no cover up. I had no problem with it coming back in the news either. thought the anti choicers were making a mistake to bring it back from their best interests but that was fine by me.

    Only questions are will Pennsylvania do anything to fix the source of the problem. Haven’t heard any reason for hope yet.

  9. 9.

    Roger Moore

    May 13, 2013 at 6:31 pm

    @grape_crush:

    Either it wasn’t widely known or there was an effort not to talk about that topic in the runup to the elections.

    It isn’t necessarily a conspiracy. It could be a simple example of the news being worried about other stuff when the case first came out, letting it drop, and only now getting excited about it because it’s coming to trial. Of course the conservatives are going to scream about liberal coverups, but that doesn’t mean that there’s anything real going on even with the conservative decision to cover now.

  10. 10.

    freemark

    May 13, 2013 at 6:31 pm

    Once you outlaw abortions, only outlaws will perform abortions.

  11. 11.

    Roger Moore

    May 13, 2013 at 6:44 pm

    @freemark:

    Once you outlaw abortions, only outlaws will perform abortions.

    You may think that’s a counter-argument, but others would disagree. If abortion is outlawed, doctors who perform them will be outlaws, and the wingnuts will be able to use the power of the state to kill them rather than having to murder them willy-nilly. They see that as a win.

  12. 12.

    Chris

    May 13, 2013 at 6:52 pm

    @Roger Moore:

    The logic of “liberal coverup” kind of flies in the face of the media’s willingness to bend over backwards repeating wingnut memes on the IRS, Benghazi, ACORN, “our out of control deficit,” the nature of the Tea Party Movement, and even utterly farcical stuff like Obama’s birth certificate and Obamacare’s death panels. Hard to find any examples of them providing that kind of cover for liberal memes, ever.

    The explanation that the media tends to underreport stories that come out of poor neighborhoods is far more likely an explanation, and it also explains why conservative and mainstream media alike ignored the story for two years.

  13. 13.

    wiscomom

    May 13, 2013 at 6:53 pm

    Will the pro-life forces want the death penalty? Just asking as a Catholic who doesn’t tend to listen to my bishops.

  14. 14.

    dance around in your bones

    May 13, 2013 at 7:00 pm

    When I read about this case, the first thing I thought was “This is what you get when abortion is not legal, regulated, and readily available for those who need it”.

    It’s totally sick that r-wingers/conservatives would hold this up as an example of what abortion REALLY IS since they have been driving towards this for years. Heckofajob, wingers.

  15. 15.

    Todd

    May 13, 2013 at 7:09 pm

    More NARAL fail.

    Forty years of pisspoor messaging have come to roost at the feet of NARAL, and it aint pretty. Somehow, we are supposed to believe that a Helen Reddy style chorus of voices that shrieked “my choice, men just need to SHUT UP” was really defending everyone from having the church interfere in their medical choices via the government. Likewise, we’re supposed to believe that the deafening nothing heard from Philadelphia was the sound of choice activists coming down hard on an asshole.

    They got the most profoundly far reaching libertarian opinion from a court ever, and allowed giggling conservatards to go into mocking mode over the very real issues of privacy. Imagine the ramifications for LGBT issues had the NARAL folks properly defended Blackmuns gift in the 1970s, instead of turning it into an issue which only applied to women. Imagine what it would have done for folks who needed assisted suicide. Imagine issues related to medical marijuana.

    Fucking failures.

  16. 16.

    aimai

    May 13, 2013 at 7:28 pm

    @Todd: Oh fuck off. That is so incoherent I can’t even tell what you think you are arguing, and I can’t be bothered to waste time trying to figure it out.

  17. 17.

    Todd

    May 13, 2013 at 7:29 pm

    The more I think about it, the more pissed off I get. Every single week, I deal with calls regarding young women 17-22 who have gone ahead and had babies with the most atrocious losers imaginable. About 2 of 3 had little chance in life to begin with, and a D&C is barely on their radar, plus, they deem it expensive. The other third come from right to lifer families who are initially eager to slut shame. Those girls will tell me how this child is the greatest thing in their lives, but their eyes are sad when they say it, as they’re now tied to place and visitation schedule and court hearings over everything from How they spend Christmas Day to child support.

  18. 18.

    Todd

    May 13, 2013 at 7:30 pm

    @aimai:

    @Todd: Oh fuck off. That is so incoherent I can’t even tell what you think you are arguing, and I can’t be bothered to waste time trying to figure it out.

    The reflexive “men have nothing to say” rhetoric screwed it all up.

  19. 19.

    Roger Moore

    May 13, 2013 at 7:51 pm

    @Todd:

    The reflexive “men have nothing to say” rhetoric screwed it all up.

    No, the actual “Todd can’t express himself clearly” problem cropped up.

  20. 20.

    Joel

    May 13, 2013 at 7:52 pm

    The sad reality is that humanitarian causes for humanitarian purposes fail to draw media interest BECAUSE they fail to draw consumer interest. Partisanship is only one way to draw “interest” but it sure is an effective one, especially for conservatives.

  21. 21.

    The prophet Nostradumbass

    May 13, 2013 at 7:58 pm

    “Abortionist”?

  22. 22.

    grape_crush

    May 13, 2013 at 8:06 pm

    @Roger Moore: but that doesn’t mean that there’s anything real going on even with the conservative decision to cover now.

    Yeah, you’re probably right. Too much of me trying to figure out what the angle or ulterior motive is.

  23. 23.

    Heliopause

    May 13, 2013 at 8:11 pm

    The anti-choice coalition wanted to use Gosnell as a weapon against women

    Which makes as much sense as using Scott Harrington as a weapon against dentistry.

  24. 24.

    burnspbesq

    May 13, 2013 at 9:19 pm

    @Todd:

    the most profoundly far reaching libertarian opinion from a court ever

    Well, that’s certainly a different way of thinking about Roe.

  25. 25.

    catpal

    May 13, 2013 at 9:35 pm

    the Gosnell case is horrible but his crime is practicing BAD Medicine as a BAD doctor — which is very common in PA — cause the PA State Board of Medicine gets complaints about Bad doctors very often — and does NOTHING.

    like another PA BAD doctor –

    Richard Glunk, the plastic surgeon who recently lost his appeal of a $20 million medical-malpractice verdict that involved the death of a Delaware County teenager, is still offering free consultations for liposuction and other procedures.

    But Glunk’s ability to nip or tuck might be curbed for a couple of months because of allegations that he tried to bribe a Hasidic rabbi who is on the state Board of Medicine.

    The state Board of Medicine sided with Glunk in those cases, with Isaacson recusing himself. But a Philadelphia jury awarded Fledderman’s parents $20.5 million in damages, and the two other liposuction patients settled their lawsuits out of court. No criminal charges were filed.

    Doctor Bribes State Medical Board

    so that Doctor BRIBED the PA State Medical board member — and is still practicing today.

    So the Medical Board Knew that Gosnell was a Bad doctor since the 1990s — and did nothing — why isn’t the PA State Medical Board on Trial also?

Comments are closed.

Primary Sidebar

Image by MomSense (5/10.25)

Recent Comments

  • Soprano2 on Tuesday Morning Open Thread: Circuses Everywhere (May 13, 2025 @ 6:52am)
  • Bupalos on Tuesday Morning Open Thread: Circuses Everywhere (May 13, 2025 @ 6:50am)
  • Baud on Tuesday Morning Open Thread: Circuses Everywhere (May 13, 2025 @ 6:50am)
  • Sally on Tuesday Morning Open Thread: Circuses Everywhere (May 13, 2025 @ 6:49am)
  • Suzanne on Tuesday Morning Open Thread: Circuses Everywhere (May 13, 2025 @ 6:48am)

PA Supreme Court At Risk

Donate

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
War in Ukraine
Donate to Razom for Ukraine

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

Meetups

Upcoming Ohio Meetup May 17
5/11 Post about the May 17 Ohio Meetup

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)
Fix Nyms with Apostrophes

Hands Off! – Denver, San Diego & Austin

Social Media

Balloon Juice
WaterGirl
TaMara
John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
David Anderson
Major Major Major Major
DougJ NYT Pitchbot
mistermix

Keeping Track

Legal Challenges (Lawfare)
Republicans Fleeing Town Halls (TPM)
21 Letters (to Borrow or Steal)
Search Donations from a Brand

PA Supreme Court At Risk

Donate

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2025 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!