Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

It’s time for the GOP to dust off that post-2012 autopsy, completely ignore it, and light the party on fire again.

fuckem (in honor of the late great efgoldman)

You cannot shame the shameless.

This year has been the longest three days of putin’s life.

There’s always a light at the end of the frog.

I see no possible difficulties whatsoever with this fool-proof plan.

Stop using mental illness to avoid talking about armed white supremacy.

Whatever happens next week, the fight doesn’t end.

We are builders in a constant struggle with destroyers. let’s win this.

Putin must be throwing ketchup at the walls.

Sitting here in limbo waiting for the dice to roll

… riddled with inexplicable and elementary errors of law and fact

They were going to turn on one another at some point. It was inevitable.

Just because you believe it, that doesn’t make it true.

Republican speaker of the house Mike Johnson: the bland and smiling face of evil.

Battle won, war still ongoing.

Accountability, motherfuckers.

Bark louder, little dog.

Our job is not to persuade republicans but to defeat them.

Stamping your little feets and demanding that they see how important you are? Not working anymore.

We cannot abandon the truth and remain a free nation.

That’s my take and I am available for criticism at this time.

I’m pretty sure there’s only one Jack Smith.

In short, I come down firmly on all sides of the issue.

You are here: Home / Open Threads / Open Thread: Stux in the Net

Open Thread: Stux in the Net

by | 88 Comments

This post is in: ,

Another triumph for bipartisanship? Michael Isikoff (past credits), at the NBC News website:

Legal sources tell NBC News that the former second ranking officer in the U.S. military is now the target of a Justice Department investigation into a politically sensitive leak of classified information about a covert U.S. cyber attack on Iran’s nuclear program.

According to legal sources, Retired Marine Gen. James “Hoss” Cartwright, the former vice chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, has received a target letter informing him that he’s under investigation for allegedly leaking information about a massive attack using a computer virus named Stuxnet on Iran’s nuclear facilities. Gen. Cartwright, 63, becomes the latest individual targeted over alleged leaks by the Obama administration, which has already prosecuted or charged eight individuals under the Espionage Act.

Last year, the New York Times reported that Cartwright, a four-star general who was vice chairman of the Joint Chiefs from 2007 to 2011, conceived and ran the cyber operation, called Olympic Games, under Presidents Bush and Obama. According to the front-page story by chief Washington correspondent David Sanger, President Obama ordered the cyber attacks sped up, and in 2010 an attack using the Stuxnet worm temporarily disabled 1,000 centrifuges that the Iranians were using to enrich uranium.

The Times story included details of the Olympic Games operation, including the cooperation of Israeli intelligence and the way the virus was introduced to an Iranian nuclear facility. It described meetings in the White House Situation Room and was based on interviews with “current and former American, European and Israeli officials involved in the program.”…

Reader Interactions

88Comments

  2. 2.

    Corner Stone

    Fucking traitor! I hope they use RC model cement to glue electrodes to his nethers! Burn!
    Irreparable! Burn!!

  3. 3.

    Corner Stone

    I have to go get some Thai cold beef noodle salad before they close.
    But, please, carry on in my stead and make me proud.

  4. 4.

    Tom Levenson

    @Corner Stone: I find it very hard to credit your commitment to the anti-witch crusade if a single plate of cold pasta would keep you from torturing your fellow creature. Suspicious even.

    Just what spell requires noodles, chillies and dead cow muscle, hmmm?

    Burn the witch!

  5. 5.

    PsiFighter37

    I do feel like this is part of the ‘no-drama Obama’ approach that the president takes way too seriously. Pretty well-known that he didn’t tolerate leaks from his campaign, but there’s no way everyone in the government is ever going to shut up about everything.

  9. 9.

    guachi

    I swear it’s the social media aspect of today’s society. Everyone has to blab about everything. As someone with a TS/SCI clearance, you learn to shut your mouth about stuff like this.

    Apparently this General never really learned this. Screw him.

  11. 11.

    Botsplainer, fka Todd

    @ChrisNYC:

    Interesting that Special Ed would make his leak shortly before this revelation was made, considering that it took years of legwork to reach this point.

  13. 13.

    Felonius Monk

    @Corner Stone: While you’re out could you grab me a bag of burgers and a six-pack. Oh yeah, some Twinkies too if they’re back on the shelves.

  14. 14.

    ruemara

    So leaks are ok and if you think leaks should be prosecuted, you’re an authoritarian. Jesus Christ, some of this shit people come up with is just ridiculous. It’s security not public information, and if you’re talking to the press before you get authorization, this is the risk you take.

  15. 15.

    Suffern ACE

    Well no point in calling off the leak expedition now. If they bag one big fish, the leak rules will be rewritten. Not that it would help the small fry we spend time worrying about.

  19. 19.

    Yatsuno

    @PsiFighter37: Depends. A retired general could still be subjected to UCMJ penalties including stripping of stars and retirement benefits. Hoss took a pretty damn big risk here.

  21. 21.

    lamh35

    ok, this tweet made me chuckle:

    @jimmeshelter 5h
    Diabetes no longer wishes to be associated with Paula Deen

  26. 26.

    Hal

    Retired Marine Gen. James “Hoss” Cartwright

    I wonder What Gen Ben Cartright and Pfc Little Joe think of this leak. Anyhow, just one more face to carve into mount rushmore next to Snowden’s.

  27. 27.

    scav

    @lamh35: Yeah, with everything else going on and crowding out the front page, those sponsors are still backing off at warp PDQ. Almost encouraging.

  31. 31.

    michelle

    I remember what got Greenwald going. It was the New York Times holding the story that the Bush administration was actually doing something illegal — snooping without a warrant — until after the election.

    Can someone please tell me where the Obama administration is breaking the law? Can someone here tell me that leaking classified material is legal and should not be pursued?

  32. 32.

    Tom Levenson

    I know the snark runs rich here, and should, but am I alone in thinking that if Hoss did what he is under investigation for having doing, this is a BFD. 4 stars compromising an ongoing covert operation to derail a hostile nation’s nuclear infrastructure? Not acceptable. Not even close.

    I know folks are tired of Snowden, and I am too — but what he did for whatever reason has a genuine civic contribution coming along with it. This leak was just destructive of an actual, chain-of-command approved operation. Big deal, bad news.

  33. 33.

    lol

    Looking forward to Greenwald’s defense of this hero who blew the whistle on America’s interference of a perfectly legitimate nuclear energy program overseas. After all, we shouldn’t speculate on motives. The important thing is that he revealed nefarious activities on the part of the neo-colonial despotic Stasi state overlord Obama.

  35. 35.

    Redshirt

    I think there are Wingnuts in high ranking positions in both the military, the government, and the bureaucracy. They are probably all committing treason on a weekly basis.

  38. 38.

    burnspbesq

    Be interesting to hear somebody explain why he’s the subject of a civilian criminal investigation instead of a potential court-martial.

  39. 39.

    Suffern ACE

    Well if anything, it’ll be fun to watch Dancing Dave, Peter King and Diane Feinstein accuse the good general of treason. Well, no, they’ll accuse the justice department if treason and compare them to bloggers run amuck.

  40. 40.

    Yatsuno

    @Tom Levenson: Hence my big risk comment. He could face both civilian and military prosecution, have his stars revoked, his retirement benefits greatly curtailed, and get sent to Leavenworth with no credit for time served in the other jurisdiction. This is a huge thing, so much so that I hope it’s not true.

  48. 48.

    Corner Stone

    @Felonius Monk:

    While you’re out could you grab me a bag of burgers and a six-pack. Oh yeah, some Twinkies too if they’re back on the shelves.

    Be happy to, as long as you play some notes that will soothe the savage authoritarian beast.

  49. 49.

    Botsplainer, fka Todd

    @burnspbesq:

    Dude, how did you get one of my pictures of Laettner from when she was a itty-bitty kitty?

    Oh, Christ – you’re a DOOKIE?!?

  52. 52.

    Suffern ACE

    @Just Some Fuckhead: I don’t know which would be more disappointing. Finding out that the general has unpaid business debts, or finding out that the general was running a side business. If the general is corrupt, I probably want him to be successful at it.

  53. 53.

    Corner Stone

    @Tom Levenson:

    I know folks are tired of Snowden, and I am too — but what he did for whatever reason has a genuine civic contribution coming along with it. This leak was just destructive of an actual, chain-of-command approved operation. Big deal, bad news.

    Burn! Burn! Burn the witch!!

  54. 54.

    Anne Laurie

    @Tom Levenson:

    Big deal, bad news

    Probably. But between Isikoff’s history of ratfcker-enabling, and the NYTimes‘ eagerness to serve as the official spokespaper of Whomever’s In Charge This Week, it’s hard not to be a little jaundiced. More virtual tinfoil for both ends of the political spectrum!

  55. 55.

    srv

    y’all may want to be careful. Carwright might be protecting someone. Who needed to be shown as doing something about those evil Iranians when Bibi was prancing around DC and all the serious people were calling Obama a wimp?

    A JCS doesn’t get there by being the independent sort.

  60. 60.

    Corner Stone

    I am incredibly amused that Lawrence O’Donnell is broadcasting from the Aspen Institute.

  62. 62.

    burnspbesq

    @Botsplainer, fka Todd:

    Joe Scott’s a hell of a player, and he went off that night.

    There’s a reason why fans storm the court (or, in the case of Maryland, burn down the town) when they beat Duke. It’s a rare and noteworthy occurrence.

  63. 63.

    Just Some Fuckhead

    @Corner Stone: Love and teach others to love, that’s just how I roll. With enough love, I believe I can make Burns appear to be almost human like.

  67. 67.

    ChrisNYC

    Come back Ed Snowden! We got the leaking bastard! If there’s genital mutilation to be done, you’re just the anti authoritarian to do it!

  69. 69.

    Just Some Fuckhead

    @Redshirt: Love and empathy in this case. I named my cat Ray Lewis. The other two cats murdered a bird and Ray tried to cover it up. It was precious and endearing.

  71. 71.

    Cacti

    @schrodinger’s cat:

    Does this have anything to do with the Snowden saga? I am so done with Snowden.

    Special Ed’s life seems to have become his own personal version of “The Terminal”.

  75. 75.

    Steeplejack

    @Tom Levenson:

    It seems likely that Cartwright was one of the sources for the Times article(s), and maybe this is a case not of malfeasance but of “backgrounder” run amok.

  76. 76.

    Ryan C

    @ruemara: as someone who was formerly cleared at that level, what the fuck are you doing bragging about this fact on a message board? That’s bad op sec. You know that, but you posted here anyway.

    Are you a “traitor”? Before you level all these big accusations at others, look in a mirror. Hypocrite.

  77. 77.

    Ryan C

    @michelle: legal = ethical, huh? Can someone point out where all those slaveholders were doing anything illegal? Your defense works for them, too.

  81. 81.

    Ramiah Ariya

    The Stuxnet program was actually war by other means on a nation with which America had not declared war. For foreigners like me it was shocking, that the American govt could just mount such an operation, with its citizens cheering on. This tells me that they would cheer further tomorrow if a nuclear bomb is actually detonated in Iran, as long as it is done “secretly”.
    So, whether you like it or not, this General did render a service, which was to tell the world that America had again violated international peace. I hope the Chinese do the same to you, and I hope you all would defend “their right to target a hostile nation”.
    For most Americans, most of the world has become “hostile nation” on which they would support any kind of covert action.

  83. 83.

    Jeremy

    @Ramiah Ariya: Okay so that was your take from that article. First of all no one supports a war with Iran except crazy neo cons, and the U.S. consulted with other nations before taking this action. A virus on a computer is not an act of war.

  84. 84.

    johnny aquitard

    @Jeremy:

    A virus on a computer is not an act of war.

    I suspect it would be if the shoe were on the other foot and a large percentage of the US nuclear or even ordinary industrial operations were rendered unusable or unsafe from a foreign power’s cyberattack.

    Wikipedia on stuxnet: “The reason for the discovery at this time is attributed to the virus accidentally spreading beyond its intended target (the Natanz plant) due to a programming error introduced in an update”

    Whocoodanode?

    Sort of what everyone fears would happen with biological viruses engineered for weapons. Also it’s a lot easier for nations that did not and do not have the resources to create such things from scratch on their own, to reverse engineer it and alter it to their purposes. At the very least this will jumpstart such nations’ own cyberwarfare programs.

  87. 87.

    ffredpalakon

    @Tom Levenson: I know that there was an attempt to turn the Olympic Games leaks into the Swiftboat issue of 2012 – this was the initiative Gabriel Gomez was involved with, but I’d like to look up when the Olympic Games stories broke. I believe it was after Ahmadinejad had already held a press conference on the failure of the centrifuges, and the publication in Wired of several in-depth stories on Stuxnet. I’m bringing this up because “ongoing” suggests that the Times Stuxnet stories broke in the midst of the operation, with the possibility of compromising it, when I believe they broke long after the operation when Stuxnet had been publicly analysed in-depth by various U.S. coders.

Comments are closed.

Trackbacks