• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

Everything is totally normal and fine!!!

The willow is too close to the house.

Quote tweet friends, screenshot enemies.

… riddled with inexplicable and elementary errors of law and fact

Republicans don’t lie to be believed, they lie to be repeated.

Republicans want to make it harder to vote and easier for them to cheat.

Battle won, war still ongoing.

It’s easy to sit in safety and prescribe what other people should be doing.

T R E 4 5 O N

Too often we hand the biggest microphones to the cynics and the critics who delight in declaring failure.

Second rate reporter says what?

There is one struggling party in US right now, and it’s not the Democrats.

Biden: Oh no. We’ve upset Big Pharma again.

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

So many bastards, so little time.

The Giant Orange Man Baby is having a bad day.

My years-long effort to drive family and friends away has really paid off this year.

They were going to turn on one another at some point. It was inevitable.

Republicans don’t trust women.

Damn right I heard that as a threat.

Give the craziest people you know everything they want and hope they don’t ask for more? Great plan.

When do we start airlifting the women and children out of Texas?

President Biden is doing good where he can, and getting it done.

Be a traveling stable for those who can’t find room at the inn.

Mobile Menu

  • Four Directions Montana
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • COVID-19 Coronavirus
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • 2024 Elections
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • Targeted Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Splattered all over Manhattan

Splattered all over Manhattan

by DougJ|  April 20, 20149:52 am| 62 Comments

This post is in: Blogospheric Navel-Gazing

FacebookTweetEmail

If Jesus had thought he’d be forced to watch this when he rose again, it’s quite likely that he would have stayed in his grave: David Brooks moderates a discussion with strategists and writers on the future of conservatism and the Republican Party at the Manhattan Institute for Policy Research Panelists include Megan McArdle, Reihan Salam, Josh Barro, Avik Roy, and Yuval Levin. (h/t Reader J)

I’m going to try to watch some of it, I’m not sure why.

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « Sunday Morning Garden Chat
Next Post: When I Get Back This Room Better Be Picked Up »

Reader Interactions

62Comments

  1. 1.

    Judge Crater

    April 20, 2014 at 9:57 am

    Is it too late to call in a bomb threat?

  2. 2.

    ruemara

    April 20, 2014 at 9:59 am

    You’re a glutton for punishment?

  3. 3.

    Schlemizel

    April 20, 2014 at 9:59 am

    Gee that sound like fun but I think I’m just going to sit in the basement hitting my balls with a hammer instead.

  4. 4.

    Baud

    April 20, 2014 at 10:00 am

    Apparently, the future of conservatism doesn’t include going to church on the holiest day in Christianity.

  5. 5.

    MattF

    April 20, 2014 at 10:03 am

    I won’t be paying attention, I’m pleased to say.

  6. 6.

    DougJ

    April 20, 2014 at 10:03 am

    @Baud:

    I guess it’s from a month ago. It’s pretty interesting to watch so far.

    Why does Josh Barro consider himself a conservative?

  7. 7.

    The Ancient Randonneur

    April 20, 2014 at 10:04 am

    I’m going to try to watch some of it, I’m not sure why.

    You either a sadist or masochist (haven’t figured out which one yet) and I don’t mean in the fun BDSM way.

  8. 8.

    Mike in NC

    April 20, 2014 at 10:05 am

    Is an Easter Sunday drone strike out of the question?

  9. 9.

    OzarkHillbilly

    April 20, 2014 at 10:06 am

    I’m going to try to watch some of it, I’m not sure why.

    Self-loathing, pure and simple self-loathing.

  10. 10.

    Baud

    April 20, 2014 at 10:06 am

    This being an important religious weekend for Christians and Jews, President Obama took a break from his typically-partisan Saturday radio address to offer Easter and Passover greetings.

    Sen. Lamar Alexander on behalf of the Republican Party? Not so much.

    “These holy days have their roots in miracles that took place long ago,” Obama said. “And yet, they still inspire us, guide us, and strengthen us today. They remind us of our responsibilities to God and, as God’s children, our responsibilities to one another. “

    Sen. Alexander declared that “lifting the big wet blanket of Obama regulations will enable our free enterprise system to create plenty of jobs.”

  11. 11.

    Baud

    April 20, 2014 at 10:08 am

    @DougJ:

    Why does Josh Barro consider himself a conservative?

    Cash.

  12. 12.

    Chyron HR

    April 20, 2014 at 10:09 am

    @Baud:

    Like Christ, the big wet blanket of regulations will be RISEN!

  13. 13.

    J

    April 20, 2014 at 10:10 am

    @Baud: like the re-purposing of the ‘wet blanket’ figure and good to know that Republicans aren’t letting sacred holidays distract them from fealty to Mammon.

  14. 14.

    jake the snake

    April 20, 2014 at 10:12 am

    You forgot the David Brooks giving a lecture tag. Too obvious?

  15. 15.

    Baud

    April 20, 2014 at 10:13 am

    @Chyron HR:

    Blessed are the job creators, for they shall inherit the earth, free from the oppressive burden of death taxes.

  16. 16.

    Poopyman

    April 20, 2014 at 10:15 am

    @Baud: Doesn’t explain why other conservatives consider him enough of a conservative to include him in these discussions.

  17. 17.

    GregB

    April 20, 2014 at 10:22 am

    I’m going to assume the pitchers on the dais contain vinegar and water.

  18. 18.

    Baud

    April 20, 2014 at 10:22 am

    @Poopyman:

    Seems like this panel is directed to the wealthy urban conservative set, not the rabid wingnut base.

  19. 19.

    Citizen_X

    April 20, 2014 at 10:23 am

    @Baud:

    lifting the big wet blanket of Obama regulations

    Eww!

  20. 20.

    Suffern ACE

    April 20, 2014 at 10:27 am

    Come see the spirited and lively back and forth between a bunch of upper middle class folk who disagree fundamentally about nothing that particularly matters to you.

  21. 21.

    Poopyman

    April 20, 2014 at 10:32 am

    @Suffern ACE: I might go if there was any chance that any one of them would get up and slap the shit out of any other one of them. Sadly, ….

  22. 22.

    geg6

    April 20, 2014 at 10:37 am

    @DougJ:

    Why does Josh Barro consider himself a conservative?

    I have asked myself this very question many times. The only answer I have is he makes a buck off of it. I generally like him, but his insistence that he’s a conservative ring rather hollow in the face of his actual stated policy positions.

  23. 23.

    amk

    April 20, 2014 at 10:38 am

    so they are admitting the gop has an existential crisis?…

    nah, who am I kidding.

  24. 24.

    chrome agnomen

    April 20, 2014 at 10:39 am

    jeebus! and they claimed the neutron bomb was inhumane! here is a clear call to challenge that ruling!

  25. 25.

    Suffern ACE

    April 20, 2014 at 10:41 am

    @Poopyman: who knows? There might be moments of tension. Maybe followed by a brief awkward silence after which everyone agrees to change the subject and move on. I live for such moments.

  26. 26.

    srv

    April 20, 2014 at 10:41 am

    Imagine a day when there is a David Brooks Institute.

    Heh, I like the young kid arguing to stop whining about the debt and zings the apocolyptian: “A conservative is someone who believes every market is efficient except the treasury bond market”

    Dude must be reading K-Thug!

    Megan: “All my ideas are electoral death”

    Avin Roy waxing about the next great conservative, someone who makes conservatism accepting of the modern era…. Lols.

  27. 27.

    Tiny Tim

    April 20, 2014 at 10:45 am

    Barro is in some sense the “fantasy moderate conservative” the beltway types crave except they don’t have any understanding of what that is anymore. Old-style conservative technocratic solutions to problems would actually be surprisingly liberal today. The “bi-partisan consensus” on addressing issues is always some unholy super expensive program that funnels money to rich people in exchange for giving some scraps to poor people, because modern conservatives are just about funneling money to rich people.. Barro’s conservative in that he thinks that if you want to help poor people you should just give them some money.

  28. 28.

    Pogonip

    April 20, 2014 at 10:49 am

    @Suffern ACE: Hee Hee Hee Hee Hee.

  29. 29.

    Baud

    April 20, 2014 at 10:51 am

    @Tiny Tim:

    Barro’s conservative in that he thinks that if you want to help poor people you should just give them some money.

    So does he want to help poor people? (Honest question. I don’t know his views on that.)

  30. 30.

    DougJ

    April 20, 2014 at 10:52 am

    @jake the snake: You are right. I’ll add it.

  31. 31.

    geg6

    April 20, 2014 at 10:52 am

    @Tiny Tim:

    I would argue that 21st century liberalism is more aligned with some of the more classical definitions of the word conservative. After all, we are trying, in many ways, to conserve the status quo left to us from the 20th century.

    It’s the modern conservatives who are radicals.

  32. 32.

    Pogonip

    April 20, 2014 at 10:53 am

    I would like to mention that FYWP published a string of hee’s but ate my long, erudite comment the other day.

    Oh, well. Happy Easter anyway, enjoy the dinner, if Easter ain’t your holiday come on over, we’ll still feed you and we’ll send you home with some of those umpteen colored eggs we now have on hand.

  33. 33.

    cmorenc

    April 20, 2014 at 10:59 am

    Actually, if all conservatives were like David Brooks, it would be splendid because they’d spend all their energies whipping up Whiggy pudding instead of brewing poisonous Tea, and giving TED talks at Aspen instead of THUG speeches about wrecking any possibility of constructive governance. I haven’t tortured myself trying to watch more than a few snippets of the linked conservative talk-panel, but I’d speculate it’s a good possibility that “Bengazi!” and “IRS scandal!” aren’t ever mentioned, even elliptically. THE REAL POINT is that if all conservatives were like this panel, they’d spend all their time babbling in harmless irrelevancy to the rest of us. The only potential danger from David Brooks is the extent to which his presence enables some deluded Democrats and moderately progressive folk into thinking a reasonable, constructive dialogue is possible with modern-day conservatives where we can somehow meet them half-way in a mutually acceptable (if imperfect) fashion.

  34. 34.

    Ash Can

    April 20, 2014 at 11:00 am

    What’s the point of this whole exercise in futility? The participants will all spout academic jargon for hours and hours, then conclude that the party’s messaging needs to be improved. Then Brooks will gush over the profundity of the conclusion, and everyone will go home thinking they’ve accomplished something.

    Oh damn, I gave away the ending, didn’t I? Well, look on the bright side — now you don’t have to watch it.

  35. 35.

    Tiny Tim

    April 20, 2014 at 11:06 am

    I think Barro is more interested in helping poor people than any republican politicians are, which is the thing that makes his “conservative” self-labeling sketchy.

  36. 36.

    mai naem

    April 20, 2014 at 11:06 am

    Okay, let’s look at this group and the GOP – Josh Barro – gay, Reihan Salam – swarthy even if he’s not he looks musleemy and his name is fer sure musleemy, Avik Roy – brown person taking white males’ jobs – also probably not Christian, Megan McArdle – married working woman with no kids – taking up white male job and not procreating, David Brooks – NYT and NY Joo – technically they want him dead after the rapture. So what do all these people have in common? The GOP doesn’t want them.

  37. 37.

    Ruckus

    April 20, 2014 at 11:08 am

    @Schlemizel:
    That does sound somehow more pleasant.

    As well as being more productive.

  38. 38.

    mai naem

    April 20, 2014 at 11:10 am

    @Tiny Tim: I’ve read Josh Barro’s stuff even before he was at the NYT and coming on MSNBC. I was genuinely surprised he was labeled a conservative. At most he’s an old fashioned Rockefeller Republican – think Jacob Javits, Millicent Fenwick, Ed Brooks.

  39. 39.

    Ruckus

    April 20, 2014 at 11:12 am

    @DougJ:
    So he can vote republican and convince himself not to throw up doing it?
    As several have stated, CASH.
    On a bet? That he lost badly and was given the choice to stand in front of the Washington Monument and shave his balls or this. He chose the greater of two evils.

  40. 40.

    MattF

    April 20, 2014 at 11:13 am

    @mai naem: Yeah, they’re all fellow travelers, useful idiots. Makes Mr. Rove happy to see them emitting vocal phenomena in public.

  41. 41.

    Crouchback

    April 20, 2014 at 11:26 am

    It’s all kind of pointless. As it currently exists, the GOP is funded by a relatively small number of rich right wing cranks. Elderly reactionaries and the Christian Right make up the core of its electoral base. And it relies on institutional advantages such as gerrymandering and voter suppression to maintain its power. All these elements make it resistant to reform – they can’t expand without breaking their current base.

    So the current GOP will not be reformed until it collapses. If current trends continue, the elderly part of the base will die off and population trends will make it difficult to maintain gerrymandering and other institutional advantages after the next census. But until then there is little incentive to reform – the GOP is in win now mode. I don’t see any point in nattering about reforming the GOP until after the 2024 presidential race.

  42. 42.

    Pooh

    April 20, 2014 at 11:27 am

    I think Josh Barro is just playing the character Donna dated for a minute on West Wing.

  43. 43.

    brettvk

    April 20, 2014 at 11:33 am

    @mai naem: Brooks is Jewish? I always took him for a High Church Anglican, for some reason.

  44. 44.

    gogol's wife

    April 20, 2014 at 11:52 am

    @Baud:

    What really enrages me about that passage is the hyphen between “typically” and “partisan.” When did it become acceptable to put hyphens between adverbs and adjectives? It now seems to be New York Times house style.

  45. 45.

    dp

    April 20, 2014 at 11:52 am

    Masochism is a terrible condition.

  46. 46.

    kindness

    April 20, 2014 at 12:00 pm

    Doesn’t the Geneva Convention make torture illegal? Listening to Brooks Round Table is certainly torture.

  47. 47.

    Hungry Joe

    April 20, 2014 at 12:03 pm

    @gogol’s wife: It’s not NY Times house style — it’s cost-saving on copy editors.

  48. 48.

    gogol's wife

    April 20, 2014 at 12:05 pm

    @Hungry Joe:

    I actually wrote to their style editor, and he argued with me about it. He thinks it’s ambiguous to omit the hyphen. The world is going to hell in a handbasket.

  49. 49.

    Baud

    April 20, 2014 at 12:06 pm

    @gogol’s wife:

    I took that quote from the Christian-Science-Monitor, not-the-New-York-Times.

  50. 50.

    gogol's wife

    April 20, 2014 at 12:13 pm

    @Baud:

    ARGHHH! The disease is spreading! And I first noticed it when my husband got back a copyedited manuscript from the University of Chicago Press. They had stuck in hyphens between adverbs and adjectives all over the manuscript. Then I started seeing it in the Times.

  51. 51.

    mai naem

    April 20, 2014 at 12:34 pm

    @brettvk: He’s jewish. I have no idea how I even know. He must have mentioned it in one of his Diane Rehm appearances. It’s in his wikipedia entry. Speaking of Diane Rehm, she had on a guy earlier this week who’s written a John Wayne biography. I didn’t listen to the whole thing but it was kind of funny because he had several people email/tweet about his WWII deferments/chickenhawkiness. The biographer was obviously an admirer of Wayne and kind of bs’d his way out of the questions.

  52. 52.

    JustRuss

    April 20, 2014 at 12:39 pm

    @gogol’s wife: Thanks for fighting the good fight. The NYT editor is a phillistine.

  53. 53.

    Hungry Joe

    April 20, 2014 at 12:40 pm

    @gogol’s wife: ***SIGH*** I kind of wish you hadn’t told me that.

  54. 54.

    Jay C

    April 20, 2014 at 12:45 pm

    @mai naem:

    Which subject always reminds of one of the more famous quotes from one of John Wayne’s more famous films (slightly edited):

    “This is the West Hollywood, sir. When the legend becomes fact, print the legend”.

  55. 55.

    Mnemosyne

    April 20, 2014 at 12:53 pm

    @mai naem:

    I didn’t listen to the whole thing but it was kind of funny because he had several people email/tweet about his WWII deferments/chickenhawkiness.

    Apparently one of the reasons Wayne was so hawkish about the Vietnam War was that his friends and colleagues who did go to WWII (especially John Ford) rode him really hard about all of his deferments. IMO, he could (somewhat) justify his deferments since he already had 4 kids to support by the time the war started, but his guilt at not going really fueled a lot of his later war hawk positions.

  56. 56.

    Alex S.

    April 20, 2014 at 2:10 pm

    @mai naem:

    Indeed! Stockholm Syndrome…

  57. 57.

    Marc

    April 20, 2014 at 2:17 pm

    Here’s one just to further piss off the front-pagers:

    David Brooks: Obama Has A ‘Manhood Problem’ In Middle East

    To paraphrase a wise man, go ask Osama bin Laden if he thinks the president has a manhood problem.

  58. 58.

    Mandalay

    April 20, 2014 at 2:21 pm

    @mai naem: Not only was Wayne a chickhawk, but he was a racist as well, even giving him a break because he spewed this stuff back in 1971….

    In a 1971 Playboy interview, Wayne said: “We can’t all of a sudden get down on our knees and turn everything over to the leadership of the blacks. I believe in white supremacy until the blacks are educated to a point of responsibility. I don’t believe in giving authority and positions of leadership to irresponsible people.” Wayne was also asked his opinion of Indians after wasting so many of them in the movies. He said: “I don’t feel we did wrong in taking this great country from them, if that’s what you’re asking. Our so-called stealing of this country from them was just a matter of survival.”

    I suspect that he and Brando weren’t very chummy.

  59. 59.

    Chris T.

    April 20, 2014 at 3:06 pm

    @mai naem:

    So what do all these people have in common? The GOP doesn’t want them.

    Oh, so that’s why they’re so desperate to get into the club!

  60. 60.

    Tehanu

    April 20, 2014 at 3:20 pm

    David Brooks moderates a discussion with strategists and writers … at the Manhattan Institute for Policy Research Panelists include

    I blearily skimmed over this and for a moment I thought it read, “Parasites include…”

  61. 61.

    divF

    April 20, 2014 at 4:13 pm

    @brettvk: There are several jokes, all along the line the Anglicanism is the route that many hyper-assimilated upper-class Jews take. For example, “dress British, think Yiddish”. There is another longer one that I am not able to tell, since the punch line requires a knowledge of Hebrew that I don’t have.

  62. 62.

    Phil Perspective

    April 20, 2014 at 7:20 pm

    @Mandalay: I suspect that he and Brando weren’t very chummy.

    I don’t think Neil Young would have been very chummy with John Wayne either.

Comments are closed.

Primary Sidebar

Recent Comments

  • Baud on Monday Morning Open Thread: The Tariff We Pay for Civilization (Apr 15, 2024 @ 10:09am)
  • Chris T. on Monday Morning Open Thread: The Tariff We Pay for Civilization (Apr 15, 2024 @ 10:09am)
  • Mousebumples on Monday Morning Open Thread: The Tariff We Pay for Civilization (Apr 15, 2024 @ 10:08am)
  • KayInMD (formerly Kay (not the front-pager)) on Monday Morning Open Thread: The Tariff We Pay for Civilization (Apr 15, 2024 @ 10:08am)
  • Xavier on Monday Morning Open Thread: The Tariff We Pay for Civilization (Apr 15, 2024 @ 10:08am)

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Balloon Juice Meetups!

All Meetups
Talk of Meetups – Meetup Planning
Proposed BJ meetups list from frosty

Fundraising 2023-24

Wis*Dems Supreme Court + SD-8
Virginia House Races
Four Directions – Montana
Worker Power AZ
Four Directions – Arizona
Four Directions – Nevada

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
Positive Climate News
War in Ukraine
Cole’s “Stories from the Road”
Classified Documents Primer

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Mailing List Signup
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)

Fix Nyms with Apostrophes

Balloon Juice for Ukraine

Donate

Twitter / Spoutible

Balloon Juice (Spoutible)
WaterGirl (Spoutible)
TaMara (Spoutible)
John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
David Anderson
Major Major Major Major
ActualCitizensUnited

Political Action 2024

Postcard Writing Information

Balloon Juice for Four Directions AZ

Donate

Balloon Juice for Four Directions NV

Donate

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2024 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!