• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

You are so fucked. Still, I wish you the best of luck.

Hi god, it’s us. Thanks a heap, you’re having a great week and it’s only Thursday!

I’m sure you banged some questionable people yourself. We’re allowed to grow past that.

The next time the wall street journal editorial board speaks the truth will be the first.

Despite his magical powers, I don’t think Trump is thinking this through, to be honest.

I really should read my own blog.

if you can’t see it, then you are useless in the fight to stop it.

Every reporter and pundit should have to declare if they ever vacationed with a billionaire.

After dobbs, women are no longer free.

Fight for a just cause, love your fellow man, live a good life.

Fight them, without becoming them!

Pessimism assures that nothing of any importance will change.

A thin legal pretext to veneer over their personal religious and political desires.

Jack be nimble, jack be quick, hurry up and indict this prick.

Biden: Oh no. We’ve upset Big Pharma again.

I’ve spoken to my cat about this, but it doesn’t seem to do any good.

These days, even the boring Republicans are nuts.

Trump’s legal defense is going to be a dumpster fire inside a clown car on a derailing train.

Balloon Juice has never been a refuge for the linguistically delicate.

Red lights blinking on democracy’s dashboard

There are more Russians standing up to Putin than Republicans.

You don’t get to peddle hatred on saturday and offer condolences on sunday.

If senate republicans had any shame, they’d die of it.

Another missed opportunity for Jamie Dimon to just shut the fuck up.

Mobile Menu

  • Four Directions Montana
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • COVID-19 Coronavirus
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • 2024 Elections
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • Targeted Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Anderson On Health Insurance / Wyden waivers and the CBO scores

Wyden waivers and the CBO scores

by David Anderson|  March 13, 20157:18 am| 7 Comments

This post is in: Anderson On Health Insurance, The Failed Obama Administration (Only Took Two Weeks)

FacebookTweetEmail

The Wyden Waiver (Section 1332 of PPACA) is an extremely interesting dare built into the Affordable Care Act that if the Republican Party was interested in policy, we should be hearing a lot about early prep work.  The dare is simple:

If a state can do as well or better in providing as good coverage to as many people at the same or lower cost as provided through the Exchanges but can do so in a different model, they can build out an Obamacare alternative effective 1/1/17.

The feds would kick in the entire expected sum of premium subsidies, cost sharing assistance subsidies and small business subsidies to the state.  The state could tweak benefit packages, get rid of the mandates, change essential health benefits and pay for those changes with the federal block grant.  Vermont had planned on a Wyden Waiver for its single payer plan that fell apart on the issue of transition costs.

The big constraints on a Wyden Waiver is that it had to be deficit neutral for the federal government and it had to be as good or better than the current Exchange model.

When PPACA was first scored by the CBO (March 20, 2010 report, Table 3), the CBO expected the Exchange and small business tax credits to cost $78 billion dollars in 2017.  That estimate has been steadily decreasing.  Now, the March 2015 baseline has an estimate of $73 billion dollars for direct coverage expansion costs on the Exchange.  Premium costs are still growing slower than expected and the CBO is starting to model that there has been a real and sustained slow down in medical inflation that is somewhat disconected from general economic conditions.

Innovating programs that can do the better with the same level of resources are far easier to pull off when the budget is fat.  My question is what does the declining net cost of coverage expansion through both lower unit cost and higher employer sponsored insurance uptake do to the feasibility of states that want to go the Wyden Waiver route?  A cheaper PPACA means the success zone’s lower boundary got higher and the entire zone got narrower.

 

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « BuzzFeed Exploits Unsuspecting Cats for Political Propaganda Purposes
Next Post: I Woke Up Alarmed »

Reader Interactions

7Comments

  1. 1.

    Baud

    March 13, 2015 at 7:29 am

    Expect the waiver to be broadly interpreted beyond all recognition if the GOP wins the White House next year.

    Oh, and all those concerns about executive branch lawmaking to evaporate as quickly as deficit concerns.

  2. 2.

    WereBear

    March 13, 2015 at 7:45 am

    I recently read a book that was published a few years back. It described the then-current pitiful state of our health care system, and the last chapter outlined all the things that needed to be done to turn it around.

    I was thrilled to note that ACA hit almost all of them. That President Obama! He knows how to write legislation too, I suspect.

  3. 3.

    MomSense

    March 13, 2015 at 8:18 am

    if the Republican Party was interested in policy,

    Ha.

  4. 4.

    Jinchi

    March 13, 2015 at 8:59 am

    Keep in mind that the Republicans just replaced the head of the CBO with Keith Hall, chief economist for the White House Council of Economic Advisers under George W Bush. They did it, in part, because they didn’t like how the CBO scored the health care law.

    Republicans were frustrated by some of the CBO’s analyses of the Affordable Care Act. The agency could play a key role in scoring Republican Obamacare replacement plans, such as the blueprint put forward by Senate Finance Committee Chairman Orrin Hatch (R-Utah) and two other GOP legislators.

    http://www.modernhealthcare.com/article/20150227/NEWS/150229910

  5. 5.

    Tom Levenson

    March 13, 2015 at 9:43 am

    Just a bit off topic: What drives me utterly crazy about elite media right now is the way the GOP gets away with hammering the mantra of Obamacare’s failure. Every single time one of those folks say that, it’s the job of a journalist to press home on the claim. They don’t. Ever…and hence the implications of what Richard’s saying never reach the world of off-K St. political discourse.

  6. 6.

    WaterGirl

    March 13, 2015 at 10:53 am

    I thought this was going to be an action post.

    Wyden waivers and the CBO scores

    I read “waivers” and “scores” as verbs.

  7. 7.

    benw

    March 13, 2015 at 2:23 pm

    Richard, thanks again for some expert level posting. It seems to me that the Wyden waivers are a good thing for those of who support a more progressive health care system in the US, as long as the Federal exchanges will always remain in place as a backstop. Most states that are resisting the PPACA are doing to basic things: declining the Medicare expansion thanks to the Supreme Court ruling, and refusing to set up their own exchanges. So the Federal exchanges serve the people in those states.

    If Republicans win the Presidency and maintain control of Congress in 2016, they can try to change Federal law to interpret “good coverage” broadly enough to allow states with working exchanges to eliminate them via a Wyden waiver with nothing to really replace them. But this will simply push people onto the Federal exchanges. And in order to get into the narrower zone of the cheaper ACA, states will have to be more aggressive with plans like single-payer to be better than the exchanges.

    So the pressure provided by the waivers seems to push toward more progressive health care legislation at the state level. I didn’t know that VT’s plan failed the waiver; that’s too bad because the VT plan seems perfect for the Wyden waiver test. What would be really disastrous in the current system is for a Republican government to eliminate the Federal exchanges.

Comments are closed.

Primary Sidebar

Recent Comments

  • Geminid on Late Night Weekend Wrap-Up Open Thread: Journamalism, Not A Dependable Profit Center (Apr 15, 2024 @ 8:42am)
  • Betty on On The Road – Albatrossity – Spring migration begins (Apr 15, 2024 @ 8:42am)
  • Baud on Late Night Weekend Wrap-Up Open Thread: Journamalism, Not A Dependable Profit Center (Apr 15, 2024 @ 8:40am)
  • Kay on Late Night Weekend Wrap-Up Open Thread: Journamalism, Not A Dependable Profit Center (Apr 15, 2024 @ 8:39am)
  • Subsole on Late Night Weekend Wrap-Up Open Thread: Journamalism, Not A Dependable Profit Center (Apr 15, 2024 @ 8:39am)

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Balloon Juice Meetups!

All Meetups
Talk of Meetups – Meetup Planning
Proposed BJ meetups list from frosty

Fundraising 2023-24

Wis*Dems Supreme Court + SD-8
Virginia House Races
Four Directions – Montana
Worker Power AZ
Four Directions – Arizona
Four Directions – Nevada

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
Positive Climate News
War in Ukraine
Cole’s “Stories from the Road”
Classified Documents Primer

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Mailing List Signup
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)

Fix Nyms with Apostrophes

Balloon Juice for Ukraine

Donate

Twitter / Spoutible

Balloon Juice (Spoutible)
WaterGirl (Spoutible)
TaMara (Spoutible)
John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
David Anderson
Major Major Major Major
ActualCitizensUnited

Political Action 2024

Postcard Writing Information

Balloon Juice for Four Directions AZ

Donate

Balloon Juice for Four Directions NV

Donate

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2024 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!