• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

Hi god, it’s us. Thanks a heap, you’re having a great week and it’s only Thursday!

Sadly, there is no cure for stupid.

I swear, each month of 2025 will have its own history degree.

Imperialist aggressors must be defeated, or the whole world loses.

America is going up in flames. The NYTimes fawns over MAGA celebrities. No longer a real newspaper.

The fight for our country is always worth it. ~Kamala Harris

There are some who say that there are too many strawmen arguments on this blog.

No offense, but this thread hasn’t been about you for quite a while.

When someone says they “love freedom”, rest assured they don’t mean yours.

Accused of treason; bitches about the ratings. I am in awe.

Those who are easily outraged are easily manipulated.

Republicans: The threats are dire, but my tickets are non-refundable!

Donald Trump found guilty as fuck – May 30, 2024!

“woke” is the new caravan.

Sitting here in limbo waiting for the dice to roll

You cannot shame the shameless.

Mediocre white men think RFK Jr’s pathetic midlife crisis is inspirational. The bar is set so low for them, it’s subterranean.

A norm that restrains only one side really is not a norm – it is a trap.

Republicans in disarray!

It’s pointless to bring up problems that can only be solved with a time machine.

Every decision we make has lots of baggage with it, known or unknown.

There are consequences to being an arrogant, sullen prick.

Oh FFS you might as well trust a 6-year-old with a flamethrower.

They are lying in pursuit of an agenda.

Mobile Menu

  • Seattle Meet-up Post
  • 2025 Activism
  • Targeted Political Fundraising
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • COVID-19
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • 2025 Activism
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • Targeted Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Economics / C.R.E.A.M. / “Fast Tracking” the Trans-Pacific Partnership (Against Us)

“Fast Tracking” the Trans-Pacific Partnership (Against Us)

by Anne Laurie|  April 22, 20159:27 pm| 97 Comments

This post is in: C.R.E.A.M., Warren for Senate 2012, Ever Get The Feeling You've Been Cheated?, Jump! You Fuckers!

FacebookTweetEmail

Hurrah, the scintillating spirit of bipartisanship is loose in DC again, per the NYTimes:

…[I]ncreasingly, Congress, under Republican control, is pressing forward on broad aspects of President Obama’s end-of-term agenda.

On a huge trade agreement, Republicans are pursuing legislation with virtually no Democratic support… The forward movement also reflects Republicans’ eagerness for legislative achievements before the 2016 presidential race, and their far larger say in drafting legislation and setting the terms of the debate after gaining full control of Congress last year…

On Tuesday, the Senate Finance Committee will hold its final hearing on legislation granting the president “fast track” negotiating authority to complete a trade accord with 12 Pacific Rim nations, and it will formally draft the bill on Wednesday. The House Ways and Means Committee will draft similar legislation on Thursday, moving forward on one of the president’s top priorities over the vociferous opposition of much of his party…

The new push on trade promotion authority stems from Mr. Obama’s “strategic pivot” to Asia since the opening months of his presidency and a yearslong effort to negotiate the Trans-Pacific Partnership, which would be the largest trade deal since the North American Free Trade Agreement….

…[C]onservative groups like Americans for Tax Reform, the Cato Institute and the American Enterprise Institute have come out strongly in favor of the trade authority, as has the editorial board of The Wall Street Journal.

In a first for Mr. Obama, he may achieve a legislative victory on an almost party-line vote in which his party votes no…

So, amazingly, the Grey Lady is cheerleading a “bipartisan” trade agreement that will give megacorporations even more control over our government, and prove a boon to the Republicans and their legislative enablers, while making the lives of us 99%ers that much harder?

Timothy B. Lee Vox has a long comprehensive explanation of the agreement: “The Trans-Pacific Partnership is great for elites. Is it good for anyone else?”

Via Ed Kilgore, at the Washington Monthly, here’s Professor Krugman’s opinion in late February:

… It’s far from clear that the T.P.P. is a good idea. It’s even less clear that it’s something on which President Obama should be spending political capital. I am in general a free trader, but I’ll be undismayed and even a bit relieved if the T.P.P. just fades away…

What the T.P.P. would do, however, is increase the ability of certain corporations to assert control over intellectual property. Again, think drug patents and movie rights.

Is this a good thing from a global point of view? Doubtful. The kind of property rights we’re talking about here can alternatively be described as legal monopolies. True, temporary monopolies are, in fact, how we reward new ideas; but arguing that we need even more monopolization is very dubious — and has nothing at all to do with classical arguments for free trade…

So what I wonder is why the president is pushing the T.P.P. at all. The economic case is weak, at best, and his own party doesn’t like it. Why waste time and political capital on this project?…

And I got an email from my senior Senator this morning:

Have you seen what’s in the new TPP trade deal?

Most likely, you haven’t – and don’t bother trying to Google it. The government doesn’t want you to read this massive new trade agreement. It’s top secret.

Why? Here’s the real answer people have given me: “We can’t make this deal public because if the American people saw what was in it, they would be opposed to it.”

If the American people would be opposed to a trade agreement if they saw it, then that agreement should not become the law of the United States.

Let’s send a loud message to our trade officials: No vote on a fast-track for trade agreements until the American people can see what’s in this TPP deal. Sign this petition right now to make the TPP agreement public…

For more than two years now, giant corporations have had an enormous amount of access to see the parts of the deal that might affect them and to give their views as negotiations progressed. But the doors stayed locked for the regular people whose jobs are on the line.

If most of the trade deal is good for the American economy, but there’s a provision hidden in the fine print that could help multinational corporations ship American jobs overseas or allow for watering down of environmental or labor rules, fast track would mean that Congress couldn’t write an amendment to fix it. It’s all or nothing.

Before we sign on to rush through a deal like that – no amendments, no delays, no ability to block a bad bill – the American people should get to see what’s in it.

Sherrod Brown has been leading this fight, and he points out that TPP isn’t classified military intelligence – it’s a trade agreement among 12 countries that control 40% of the world’s economy. A trade agreement that affects jobs, environmental regulations, and whether workers around the globe are treated humanely. It might even affect the new financial rules we put in place after the 2008 crisis. This trade agreement doesn’t matter to just the biggest corporations – it matters to all of us…

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « Scenes From Feudal America
Next Post: Late Night Horrorshow Open Thread »

Reader Interactions

97Comments

  1. 1.

    Corner Stone

    April 22, 2015 at 9:35 pm

    Anyone who watched Morning Joe this AM saw Paul Ryan try his best to duck and weave around the idea that when they disagree with Obama it is principled and they offer alternatives but when they agree with Obama they want to support him.
    They all want this to go through. Should be enough said.
    How do we think it’s good to try and sell to countries where the populace can’t afford any of our exports as consumers?
    They are not our customers. They are our emerging workforce.

  2. 2.

    Corner Stone

    April 22, 2015 at 9:37 pm

    There’s just no way we should grant fast track for this.

  3. 3.

    Major Major Major Major

    April 22, 2015 at 9:40 pm

    “The American people are opposed to it” is not actually a policy argument, any more than “the American people are for it.”

    That said, thanks for the links. I’ve generally supported this deal because I think free trade is something of a moral responsibility (it often leads to the rich subsidizing the poor, the fact that they’re different countries is irrelevant). But if the details are this toxic, especially the IP stuff, no thanks. That system is broken enough without including other countries.

    But like, I’m torn. I’m a librarian so I don’t want things that break international IP even more, but my in laws are vietnamese and I want to help that country be more …not cripplingly poor.

  4. 4.

    srv

    April 22, 2015 at 9:40 pm

    So what I wonder is why the president is pushing the T.P.P. at all. The economic case is weak, at best, and his own party doesn’t like it. Why waste time and political capital on this project?…

    Derp, who do you think is going to pay for that Presidential Library & Foundation?

    All those quotes and you missed Obama throwing Liz & Harry under the bus this morning.

  5. 5.

    Corner Stone

    April 22, 2015 at 9:43 pm

    @Major Major Major Major:

    I’ve generally supported this deal because I think free trade is something of a moral responsibility

    I…uhhmmm…what?

  6. 6.

    Bobby B

    April 22, 2015 at 9:45 pm

    The Corporation has made Its will clear and the president will obey his Masters. Thy will be done, O Corporation.

  7. 7.

    Major Major Major Major

    April 22, 2015 at 9:46 pm

    @Corner Stone: hurting your own country’s economy in a way that will benefit multiples more people than you’re hurting here? It’s basic redistribution.

    Like, I’m sure we can agree that taxing somebody rich and using that money to provide healthcare for the poor is good.

    Free trade, if done non-corruptly, sort of is the same thing, but with nations. But it sounds like this one is kind of nasty. The reason i didn’t know any details is because they weren’t out there. I’m not a goddamned libertarian I just want to minimize suffering and think a vietnamese life is worth as much as an American one.

  8. 8.

    srv

    April 22, 2015 at 9:51 pm

    @Corner Stone:

    I…uhhmmm…what?

    You have an alternate reality to the Perfect World?

    Jeez, get with the program, it’s almost 40 years now.

  9. 9.

    Zinsky

    April 22, 2015 at 9:54 pm

    The thing that galls me about this TPP turd is the way it is being kept from public view. “Trust us”, these assholes say. “It will be good for America”, they say. Yeah, right. Anyone who supports this sort of surreptitious legislation doesn’t deserve to hold elected office in this once great democracy of ours. That includes Mr. Obama.

  10. 10.

    Howard Beale IV

    April 22, 2015 at 9:57 pm

    Naked Capitalism has been doing yeoman’s work covering just how bad TTP and TTIP is. And when Naked Capitalism points out that not only liberals but CATO finds flaws with it-it’s fucking bad deal.

  11. 11.

    Keith P.

    April 22, 2015 at 9:57 pm

    As we speak, I am crafting a letter to all involved Pacific Rim nations that any “fast-track” agreement is subject to repeal by the next Congress/President. Since they don’t have any idea who I am, I included dick pics to get their attention first.

  12. 12.

    Ripley

    April 22, 2015 at 9:58 pm

    …I got an email from my senior Senator this morning: “…The government doesn’t want you to…”

    I’m not all that good at math, but this just doesn’t add up.

  13. 13.

    RobertDSC (Quad Intel Mac)

    April 22, 2015 at 9:58 pm

    This is one of the President’s top 3 flops during his time in office. The others are Arne Duncan as Sec. of Education and staying in Afghanistan.

  14. 14.

    kindness

    April 22, 2015 at 9:59 pm

    Money. I’ll be damned but it’ll be the death of us.

  15. 15.

    Howard Beale IV

    April 22, 2015 at 9:59 pm

    Fuck the TPP and TTIP. When Elizabeth Warren and CATO are on the same side, you know it’s a bad deal.

  16. 16.

    Major Major Major Major

    April 22, 2015 at 10:00 pm

    @RobertDSC (Quad Intel Mac): well we knew about Afghanistan during the campaign.

  17. 17.

    HRA

    April 22, 2015 at 10:01 pm

    If you don’t know what is in it, how can you criticize it?

  18. 18.

    Karen in GA

    April 22, 2015 at 10:02 pm

    Sorry to go OT, but if you could send some healing thoughts towards Smudge, my 16 year old sickly kitty, please do. She hasn’t eaten, her kidneys don’t look great, and her liver isn’t much better. The vet says the odds are slim, and if Smudge were human we’d need to gather the family around — but Smudge is a stubborn girl, and recovery is within the realm of mathematical possibility. So per her regular vet’s recommendation, she’s now at the emergency vet for overnight monitoring. (Meanwhile, I’m home and very sad.)

  19. 19.

    Chris

    April 22, 2015 at 10:06 pm

    @Karen in GA:

    Sorry to hear about your kitty. Multiple good thoughts sent your way, and (to the extent that I believe these things work) prayers too. Hope she pulls through.

  20. 20.

    Mike in NC

    April 22, 2015 at 10:08 pm

    So the TPP sounds like the greatest idea to come down the pike since the Greater East Asian Co-Prosperity Sphere.

  21. 21.

    SiubhanDuinne

    April 22, 2015 at 10:12 pm

    @Karen in GA:

    You got it. See your FB page, also. Love and light to Smudge, hugs to you.

  22. 22.

    FlipYrWhig

    April 22, 2015 at 10:14 pm

    @Karen in GA: Come on, Smudgey…

  23. 23.

    Corner Stone

    April 22, 2015 at 10:15 pm

    @HRA:

    If you don’t know what is in it, how can you criticize it?

    Excelsior!

  24. 24.

    nellcote

    April 22, 2015 at 10:18 pm

    Since when is anything gov to gov negotiated in public? That’s an absurd demand. Sen Warren has an opportunity to read what’s actually been negotiated SO FAR. What exactly are her issues? Aside from hyperbole, she doesn’t really say.

  25. 25.

    divF

    April 22, 2015 at 10:24 pm

    @nellcote: Sen. Warren’s assertion is that it has not been negotiated in strict confidence, government-to-government. Instead, private U.S. corporate interests have had both influence and access to the negotiations.

    If corporations have access, then why don’t other stakeholders (e.g. environmentalists, labor unions) ?

  26. 26.

    Corner Stone

    April 22, 2015 at 10:27 pm

    @divF:

    If corporations have access, then why don’t other stakeholders (e.g. environmentalists, labor unions) ?

    The contention is that there are no other stakeholders.

  27. 27.

    Corner Stone

    April 22, 2015 at 10:29 pm

    Anyone who can argue with a straight face that this trade deal opens up markets for US MNC’s to better sell their goods is a fucking fool or a shill.

  28. 28.

    AxelFoley

    April 22, 2015 at 10:34 pm

    Sen. Warren is against it so we all have to be against it, amirite? St. Warren is never wrong and President Obama is always wrong according to emos on the left.

  29. 29.

    Mike G

    April 22, 2015 at 10:35 pm

    The Deep Government – corporations and the Security State – always gets what it wants, regardless of which party holds which positions.

  30. 30.

    nellcote

    April 22, 2015 at 10:41 pm

    Does Hillary have anything to say about this trade agreement?

  31. 31.

    Kropadope

    April 22, 2015 at 10:43 pm

    I understand the suspicion, given the lack of details available to the public so far. However, I’m familiar with Obama’s work and I think maybe we should wait until the deal is truly out there with it’s details being debated before judging.

    Who knows? Maybe this “fast-track” the Rs are falling over themselves to support is a Trojan horse that will allow Obama to advance a truly sensible trade agreement that the Rs already negotiated away their ability to edit.

  32. 32.

    Corner Stone

    April 22, 2015 at 10:46 pm

    @AxelFoley: When was the last trade deal that benefited the working class of the US?
    It wasn’t NAFTA, CAFTA-DR and it’s not this one.

  33. 33.

    Corner Stone

    April 22, 2015 at 10:48 pm

    Man, Bobby Flay. Do you know what kind of a buzz saw you married into?

  34. 34.

    Tree With Water

    April 22, 2015 at 10:56 pm

    Tonight speaking with Rachel Maddow, Warren remarked senators can read the treaty, but not discuss what they’ve read publicly. She looked embarrassed saying it, as she damn well should have. Rules are made to be broken, especially stupid ones. I mean, WTF? The way I see it, at this point it’s not matter of she/they can’t, but that she/they won’t. The full text of the Unseen Treaty would have already been published, were ours a functioning democracy. I challenge any and all congressional democrats to cut the bullshit, and leak the damn report in total. Who the hell do those people think they are anyway?

  35. 35.

    Carolinus

    April 22, 2015 at 10:58 pm

    @divF:

    If corporations have access, then why don’t other stakeholders (e.g. environmentalists, labor unions) ?

    Isn’t this just referring to the the long standing USTR trade advisory committee system where there are all sorts of stakeholder (environmental, industry, infectious disease, etc) committees that are available for input and advice? They’ve solicited input from plenty of non-corporate stakeholders too.

  36. 36.

    Peale

    April 22, 2015 at 11:06 pm

    @Tree With Water: yep. Yep. Yep.

    secret treaties? Makes no sense. What are they voting on?

  37. 37.

    nellcote

    April 22, 2015 at 11:06 pm

    @divF:

    If corporations have access, then why don’t other stakeholders (e.g. environmentalists, labor unions) ?

    per the Maddow show Warren asserts corps have 85% participation, presumably enviros, unions, etc have the rest.

    btw are these the same unions that support building the Keystone Pipeline?

  38. 38.

    nellcote

    April 22, 2015 at 11:09 pm

    @Tree With Water:

    The full text of the Unseen Treaty would have already been published

    they’re still negotiating it. When they have a final treaty, congress will have an opportunity to debate and shut it down if they want.

  39. 39.

    Tenar Darell

    April 22, 2015 at 11:15 pm

    So, probable crappy secret copyright & patent treaties, with extra added unenforceable environmental and labor clauses in our futures or what? Awesome sauce! Can I get three cheers? Half a cheer? Howzabout no cheers for us?

    On another depressing note,
    I read this interview with Krakauer in Salon. “Rolling Stone has a lot to answer for”: Jon Krakauer on campus rape, victim backlash and why “Missoula” was the hardest book he’s had to write.

    Summary – He wrote a book about two recent rape trials in Missoula. He’s better known for Into Thin Air And Into the Wild, but his book Under the Banner of Heaven about a murder by a fundamentalist Mormon of his wife. If it’s as good, it will be a very worthwhile read, but very very hard to take.

  40. 40.

    Tree With Water

    April 22, 2015 at 11:19 pm

    @nellcote: Thank you, and I stand corrected. It still doesn’t sit right with me, however.

  41. 41.

    Tenar Darell

    April 22, 2015 at 11:24 pm

    Sorry Anne Laurie, I re-read the tags and just realized I went way o/t.

  42. 42.

    burnspbesq

    April 22, 2015 at 11:26 pm

    @Corner Stone:

    There’s just no way we should grant fast track for this.

    Way to conflate two issues, dumbfuck.

    Fast-track gives our treaty partners the assurance that the deal they thought they negotiated is the actual deal, because there is only one American negotiator at the table, not 536, and that person has the authority to say “yes.” Even you should be able to understand that deals don’t get made if the decision-maker isn’t in the room.

    It’s still a treaty, which means that it takes 67 votes for ratification. If it’s a shit sandwich on stale bread (as it very well might be, and if it is, I will be all over Feinstein and Boxer asking them to vote “no”), then it should be child’s play for Warren, Sanders, et al to find 34 “no” votes. And if they can’t, too damn bad, and you can just go suck Erik Loomis’ dick.

  43. 43.

    jl

    April 22, 2015 at 11:26 pm

    I saw the TPP referred to in the blog post and the linked articles as a ‘trade agreement’. Most large media organizations insist on calling it a ‘free trade’ agreement.

    Calling a ‘free trade’ agreement is not completely dishonest, since there are a few trade barriers (as conventionally defined, such as tariffs) that can be reduced for eliminated. But Krugman is right, the parts that are about intellectual property rights and extending patent monopolies will have far more impact. And also provisions that create, in effect, very strong de facto investment insurance for large corporations against anything that they claim interferes with their idea of what their profits of a business venture should be.

    Below a youtube clip of Stliglitz, apparently talking to a dissident group of TPP negotiators.

    Prof Stiglitz on TPP 2015
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NX3-ogcwFQ0

  44. 44.

    Mike E

    April 22, 2015 at 11:27 pm

    @nellcote:

    Does Hillary have anything to say about this trade agreement?

    Yeah, prolly under breath, “Thank God nobody gives a shit about this.”

  45. 45.

    Corner Stone

    April 22, 2015 at 11:31 pm

    @burnspbesq: In a strange way, I agree with you, you fucking gaping asshole of assholishness.
    I want this fucking deal killed. So to deny fast track should hopefully tell all other parties that it ain’t gonna happen. So go suck burnsie’s cock for a while.

  46. 46.

    jl

    April 22, 2015 at 11:32 pm

    Doesn;t look like the TPP will lead to harmonization, trade or any other wise.

  47. 47.

    burnspbesq

    April 22, 2015 at 11:33 pm

    @Corner Stone:

    34 is the magic number. You can count that high, can’t you?

  48. 48.

    Corner Stone

    April 22, 2015 at 11:34 pm

    @burnspbesq: Who said anything about a veto proof anything, you fucking gaping asshole of stupidity?

  49. 49.

    BobS

    April 22, 2015 at 11:34 pm

    @AxelFoley: Since your ability to understand many things seems to be limited to who is for or against, try to remember that most Republicans are for the TPP. @nellcote: Normal procedures, e.g. debate, are set aside with Fast Track.

  50. 50.

    Corner Stone

    April 22, 2015 at 11:35 pm

    Imagine that, the stooge of big tax dodger assholes waking up to talk shit about the trade deal that benefits big biz. Shocking.

  51. 51.

    kc

    April 22, 2015 at 11:36 pm

    Glad people are finally paying attention to this.

  52. 52.

    Violet

    April 22, 2015 at 11:36 pm

    Last Friday I was picking someone up from the airport and had to circle a couple of times so listened to NPR. Bobo and E. J. Dionne were on for their politics segment. They were asked about the TPP. I think it was Bobo who said the good thing about these kinds of trade agreements, as with NAFTA, is that they help lift poor countries and their people out of poverty and said there was no arguing with that. Then either he or EJ (probably him) said the downside is that it hurts low income people in the US and decades down the road we haven’t figured out what to do about that and this agreement will probably do the same thing and make it worse for American workers. And then they all “Hmmmm”-ed and “Uh huh”-ed in agreement and the host changed the subject.

    So there’s your Nice Polite Republican take on good jobs going overseas. Lots of Concern Hmmmm-ing.

  53. 53.

    Corner Stone

    April 22, 2015 at 11:37 pm

    @BobS:

    Since your ability to understand many things seems to be limited to who is for or against, try to remember that most Republicans are for the TPP

    ONT’s ability to understand anything comes down to one thing, and one thing only.

  54. 54.

    kc

    April 22, 2015 at 11:39 pm

    @AxelFoley:

    Tell us why we should support it, Axel.

  55. 55.

    PurpleGirl

    April 22, 2015 at 11:41 pm

    @Karen in GA: Sorry to hear about Smudge. Hope she gets better. {{{{{Hugs}}}}} for you and skritches for her.

  56. 56.

    kc

    April 22, 2015 at 11:43 pm

    @Karen in GA:

    Aw, I’m sorry.

  57. 57.

    Corner Stone

    April 22, 2015 at 11:44 pm

    @kc: AxelFoley: OBAMMMMMAAA!!

  58. 58.

    Omnes Omnibus

    April 22, 2015 at 11:56 pm

    So is the consensus that we are against the treaty, against fast track authority, against both, or something else? Me, these days, if a trade agreement does not contain enforceable labor and environmental clauses, I am opposed.

  59. 59.

    kc

    April 22, 2015 at 11:57 pm

    @Corner Stone:

    EMOPROG.

  60. 60.

    Corner Stone

    April 22, 2015 at 11:58 pm

    @kc: *sobs*

  61. 61.

    BobS

    April 23, 2015 at 12:00 am

    @Corner Stone: I found OBAMMMMMAAA’s!!! remark to Matthews about Warren being wrong particularly classy considering he made it while sitting at a table surrounded by his cheerleaders. I’d have been more impressed if the Salesman-in-Chief had invited Warren to debate the merits of both the TPP and Fast Track authority.

  62. 62.

    Corner Stone

    April 23, 2015 at 12:01 am

    @Omnes Omnibus:

    So is the consensus that we are against the treaty, against fast track authority, against both, or something else?

    So far it seems that if you’re burnspbesq and/or someone who is overly invested in President Obama then this trade agreement is the best thing that’s happened to America since sliced bread met the George Foreman grill.

  63. 63.

    Corner Stone

    April 23, 2015 at 12:02 am

    @BobS:

    I’d have been more impressed if the Salesman-in-Chief had invited Warren to debate the merits of both the TPP and Fast Track authority.

    Apparently she’s not allowed to talk about those aspects.
    And since none of the proponents are actually voicing those pro talking points…
    Hmmm.

  64. 64.

    Cacti

    April 23, 2015 at 12:04 am

    Well, If Liz Warren reflexively opposes it, that’s good enough for me.

    She did recently vouch for the good character of Chuck Schumer after all.

    And it only took her to her 40s to realize that Republicans suck.

    A veritable John Cole of the US Senate.

  65. 65.

    Omnes Omnibus

    April 23, 2015 at 12:04 am

    @Corner Stone: Burnsie is overly invested in the George Foreman grill? I am stunned.

    @Cacti: So do you support the agreement?

  66. 66.

    Tenar Darell

    April 23, 2015 at 12:05 am

    @Karen in GA: Virtual skritches for Smudge, pats for Iggy, and actual good thoughts for you all.

  67. 67.

    Cacti

    April 23, 2015 at 12:07 am

    @Omnes Omnibus:

    I neither support nor oppose it at this point.

  68. 68.

    Corner Stone

    April 23, 2015 at 12:07 am

    @Omnes Omnibus: You should not go there. You would not last an hour. You just would not.

  69. 69.

    BobS

    April 23, 2015 at 12:08 am

    @Cacti: Yeah, there’s Warren. And Bernie Sanders, Sherrod Brown, Barbara Mikulski, Al Franken, etc.

  70. 70.

    Cacti

    April 23, 2015 at 12:09 am

    @BobS:

    What exactly are they opposing?

  71. 71.

    Corner Stone

    April 23, 2015 at 12:11 am

    @Cacti: Trade deals are reflexively bad at this stage of our economy. Can you, or anyone, inform us on the last time a trade deal enured to the benefit of actual people in America?
    And I don’t mean “Real Merkins”. I mean anybody here that wasn’t a major shareholder in the Fortune 500?
    NAFTA screwed family owned farms in Mexico, in addition to a number of categories in Central America, and basically gave Big Ag a huge benefit.
    CAFTA-DR came right along behind that.
    Who thinks this deal isn’t going to be more of the same thing?

  72. 72.

    Cacti

    April 23, 2015 at 12:13 am

    @Corner Stone:

    If you don’t have an answer, that’s fine, just say so.

  73. 73.

    BobS

    April 23, 2015 at 12:14 am

    @Cacti: The lack of collaboration with Congress for one thing.

  74. 74.

    Omnes Omnibus

    April 23, 2015 at 12:14 am

    @Corner Stone:You’re probably right. You have to understand that my personal military experience means nothing compared to someone’s family military history (Oh, yeah. at the same time, my family’s military history has no bearing on the conversation) and I have a 10,000 acre field across from my house. Or something.

    Edited slightly for spelling

  75. 75.

    Corner Stone

    April 23, 2015 at 12:15 am

    @Cacti: WTF are you babbling about you fucking fool?
    Ifsh you dontsh knowsh then dontsh.
    Shut the fuck up, dumb ass.

  76. 76.

    Cacti

    April 23, 2015 at 12:15 am

    @BobS:

    The lack of collaboration with Congress for one thing.

    Surely there’s a more compelling reason than Senatorial egos.

  77. 77.

    Corner Stone

    April 23, 2015 at 12:17 am

    @Omnes Omnibus: I thought it was awesome when you got called a troll and then a bully in the same thread.

  78. 78.

    Omnes Omnibus

    April 23, 2015 at 12:18 am

    @Corner Stone: It was interesting.

  79. 79.

    nellcote

    April 23, 2015 at 12:22 am

    on labor issues:
    https://ustr.gov/issue-areas/labor

    on environmental issues:
    https://ustr.gov/issue-areas/environment

  80. 80.

    BobS

    April 23, 2015 at 12:24 am

    @Cacti: You call it “Senatorial egos”, I call it someone to weight the scales a little more for labor and the environment and a little less for the corporate interests who are over-represented in the negotiations. Now, if you wouldn’t mind, go fuck yourself.

  81. 81.

    Violet

    April 23, 2015 at 12:27 am

    @Corner Stone: That was my favorite part.

  82. 82.

    Corner Stone

    April 23, 2015 at 12:28 am

    @nellcote: On labor and environmental issues:
    http://www.aflcio.org/Issues/Trade/Trans-Pacific-Partnership-Free-Trade-Agreement-TPP

  83. 83.

    Corner Stone

    April 23, 2015 at 12:33 am

    This Spurs-Clips game is kind of nuts, in a really low key kinda way.

  84. 84.

    Peale

    April 23, 2015 at 1:04 am

    @Omnes Omnibus: both. On the fast track authority, it was a power congress gave bush and I know why Obama wants to keep it. I don’t think it was good then so why would the democrats flip on that now?

    As for the TPP, It would be helpful to know more. But only the IP part has leaked and I honestly Dont care much about that. Mainly because it brings our IP laws to the other partners. Yeah, I think our copyright laws should allow more items into the public domain and patents should expire more quickly than they do but it’s not like our laws are suddenly worse.

    Besides Obama, are any Dems supporting this? If not that kind of says there’s a problem. It could be that there isn’t and Obama is somehow tricking the Reboicans into introducing and voting for unpopular legislation that will doom them to electoral defeat…but I doubt that.

  85. 85.

    Karen in GA

    April 23, 2015 at 1:08 am

    Thanks for the good wishes. She’s hanging in — not much better, but no worse. Hoping tomorrow brings some improvement. Going to try to get some sleep.

  86. 86.

    NotMax

    April 23, 2015 at 1:09 am

    @Omnes Omnibus

    And in the whole history of your family’s military service, “not once” did they ever come home to find a dead body in the house.

    Not once. Ponder that.

    (couldn’t resist)

  87. 87.

    Steeplejack (phone)

    April 23, 2015 at 1:18 am

    @Corner Stone:

    Heh, that never gets old.

  88. 88.

    Steeplejack (phone)

    April 23, 2015 at 1:22 am

    @Corner Stone:

    He was picking a fight to no purpose.

  89. 89.

    Suzanne

    April 23, 2015 at 1:42 am

    @Karen in GA: Hugs to you and to Smudge.

  90. 90.

    Suzanne

    April 23, 2015 at 1:44 am

    @Omnes Omnibus: I adore you. Your trolling of Tommy has never failed to amuse me. MORE MORE.

    @Corner Stone: Which thread was that? I must read.

    On an unrelated note, did anyone watch the “Football Town Nights” skit on Inside Amy Schumer? LMMFAO.

  91. 91.

    opiejeanne

    April 23, 2015 at 2:39 am

    @Violet: Which thread? I have missed so much today.

  92. 92.

    opiejeanne

    April 23, 2015 at 2:41 am

    @Omnes Omnibus: OMG! I just realized who you’re talking about.

  93. 93.

    liberal

    April 23, 2015 at 3:58 am

    @burnspbesq: no, it doesnt require 67 votes, you dumbfuck. It’s not a teaty in that sense. Do some googling on the subject, you ignorant piece of shit.

  94. 94.

    Tripod

    April 23, 2015 at 10:22 am

    I did have a chuckle at the moronic assertion that those brown people don’t buy any American goods or services – probably because they’re sitting around a grass hut and the women are all topless…

  95. 95.

    J R in WV

    April 23, 2015 at 10:54 am

    @Corner Stone:

    @Omnes Omnibus:

    Surely you will both agree that these categories (bully and troll) aren’t mutually exclusive?

    ;-)

    I would think that most trolls are bullies, and vice versa, after all. I think I’m against the TPP, but it is hard to say. How many angels can dance on the head of a pin, a small straight pin, not a giant gay pin?? The TPP and angels both appear to be invisible, after all.

  96. 96.

    CONGRATULATIONS!

    April 23, 2015 at 10:59 am

    Tonight speaking with Rachel Maddow, Warren remarked senators can read the treaty, but not discuss what they’ve read publicly. She looked embarrassed saying it, as she damn well should have.

    @Tree With Water: In a nation with a functioning liberal opposition party, that would be the end of her career.

    How far we have fallen. How desperate have we become, to regard this former Republican as our progressive savior? Fucking ridiculous.

  97. 97.

    DavidTC

    April 23, 2015 at 2:13 pm

    Republicans: Against one world government, unless the corporations are in charge.

Comments are closed.

Primary Sidebar

On The Road - PaulB - Olympic Peninsula: Lake Quinault Loop Drive 5
Image by PaulB (5/19/25)

Recent Comments

  • Bill Arnold on Saving Biomedical Research (Open Thread) (May 19, 2025 @ 4:54pm)
  • gene108 on Medicaid cuts approved in the House (May 19, 2025 @ 4:54pm)
  • Omnes Omnibus on Medicaid cuts approved in the House (May 19, 2025 @ 4:53pm)
  • Ksmiami06 on Saving Biomedical Research (Open Thread) (May 19, 2025 @ 4:53pm)
  • Prometheus Shrugged on Saving Biomedical Research (Open Thread) (May 19, 2025 @ 4:53pm)

PA Supreme Court At Risk

Donate

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
War in Ukraine
Donate to Razom for Ukraine

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

Meetups

Upcoming Ohio Meetup May 17
5/11 Post about the May 17 Ohio Meetup

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)
Fix Nyms with Apostrophes

Hands Off! – Denver, San Diego & Austin

Social Media

Balloon Juice
WaterGirl
TaMara
John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
David Anderson
Major Major Major Major
DougJ NYT Pitchbot
mistermix

Keeping Track

Legal Challenges (Lawfare)
Republicans Fleeing Town Halls (TPM)
21 Letters (to Borrow or Steal)
Search Donations from a Brand

PA Supreme Court At Risk

Donate

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2025 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!