• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

Glad to see john eastman going through some things.

Peak wingnut was a lie.

This fight is for everything.

The willow is too close to the house.

One of our two political parties is a cult whose leader admires Vladimir Putin.

They were going to turn on one another at some point. It was inevitable.

A consequence of cucumbers

Please don’t feed the bears.

Donald Trump, welcome to your everything, everywhere, all at once.

fuckem (in honor of the late great efgoldman)

The cruelty is the point; the law be damned.

Wake up. Grow up. Get in the fight.

Not so fun when the rabbit gets the gun, is it?

Everybody saw this coming.

It’s easier to kill a dangerous animal than a man who just happens to have different thoughts/values than one’s own.

Jack Smith: “Why did you start campaigning in the middle of my investigation?!”

Sadly, media malpractice has become standard practice.

No one could have predicted…

Baby steps, because the Republican Party is full of angry babies.

Republicans in disarray!

rich, arrogant assholes who equate luck with genius

“What are Republicans afraid of?” Everything.

Trump makes a mockery of the legal system and cowardly judges just sit back and let him.

…and a burning sense of injustice to juice the soul.

Mobile Menu

  • Four Directions Montana
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • COVID-19 Coronavirus
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • 2024 Elections
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • Targeted Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Civil Rights / Racial Justice / This Week In Blackness / St. Louis Deals With A New Scandal: Stolen Babies

St. Louis Deals With A New Scandal: Stolen Babies

by Elon James White|  May 7, 20152:06 pm| 22 Comments

This post is in: This Week In Blackness

FacebookTweetEmail

Eighteen women in the St. Louis area who were told their babies had died at birth now suspect their children were taken and used in private adoptions. All the cases happened in the 1950s and ’60s at Homer G. Phillips Hospital to young black poor mothers mostly 15 to 20 years old. Suspicions arose after Melanie Gilmore’s children set out to find her birth mother as a surprise for her 50th birthday. After this story was revealed, others have come out with very similar stories:

In each case, a nurse — not a doctor — told the mother that her child had died, a breach of normal protocol. No death certificates were issued, and none of the mothers were allowed to see their deceased infants. … Watkins [their lawyer] has no idea who, or how many people, may have been responsible if babies were being taken, though he believes they were stolen and put up for adoption in an era when there were few adoption agencies catering to black couples. … “I never did see the baby or get a death certificate,” said [Gussie] Parker, whose daughter, Diane, works for the Associated Press in New York. “When you’re young and someone comes and tells you that your baby’s dead, in those days you accepted it.”

Here’s hoping these families are reunited. They have a lot of lost time to make up for.

Team Blackness also discussed a police torture reparations ordinance in Chicago, Satanists take on Hobby Lobby, and one hell of a weird story story with a Masonic police order in California and an attorney general staffer.

Subscribe on iTunes | Subscribe On Stitcher | Direct Download | RSS

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « Nailed In A New York Minute
Next Post: The Chips Keep Falling »

Reader Interactions

22Comments

  1. 1.

    Germy Shoemangler

    May 7, 2015 at 2:55 pm

    Key & Peele. Negrotown:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rg58d8opQKA

  2. 2.

    shell

    May 7, 2015 at 2:59 pm

    Dear God!

  3. 3.

    MomSense

    May 7, 2015 at 3:06 pm

    This is heartbreaking.

  4. 4.

    the Conster

    May 7, 2015 at 3:09 pm

    Just can’t imagine. Like the Magdalene laundries – just can’t wrap my head around how many people were/are able to rationalize such inhumanity. Although inhumanity is apparently all too human.

  5. 5.

    boatboy_srq

    May 7, 2015 at 3:09 pm

    Cue the RWNM screech about how two-parent households would prevent these things from happening in 5… 4… 3…

  6. 6.

    WereBear

    May 7, 2015 at 3:10 pm

    It’s much like the Hollywood Baby Snatcher.

  7. 7.

    Belafon

    May 7, 2015 at 3:13 pm

    @boatboy_srq: Actually, I’m pretty sure it will be more like “What racism? Blacks were taking babies as well.”

  8. 8.

    geg6

    May 7, 2015 at 3:14 pm

    Was this happening, by any chance, in Catholic hospitals? Because that’s exactly how they operate.

  9. 9.

    Belafon

    May 7, 2015 at 3:24 pm

    @geg6: I saw it in a movie involving a US diplomat, but they did have a baby to replace the original.

  10. 10.

    boatboy_srq

    May 7, 2015 at 3:30 pm

    @Belafon: Is it only our imagination that we can’t win arguments with wingnuts, or are they really as warped as we think?

  11. 11.

    Brachiator

    May 7, 2015 at 3:37 pm

    @the Conster:

    Like the Magdalene laundries – just can’t wrap my head around how many people were/are able to rationalize such inhumanity.

    Well, some people claim that they are just doing the Lord’s work.

  12. 12.

    boatboy_srq

    May 7, 2015 at 3:42 pm

    @Brachiator: Slaying heathens, torturing and killing heretics, and drowning witches have each fallen under that umbrella from time to time, too. Doesn’t make those things right, either.

  13. 13.

    WereBear

    May 7, 2015 at 4:01 pm

    @Brachiator: And they dehumanize the victims.

  14. 14.

    chopper

    May 7, 2015 at 4:02 pm

    jesus, I just can’t.

  15. 15.

    Brachiator

    May 7, 2015 at 4:05 pm

    @boatboy_srq: I wrote a simple, bland sentence to downplay my rage.

    But people who do this, often claim the best of intentions. And poor and nonwhite women have often been the worst victims of this.

    I had the great pleasure of meeting the great scientist and science writer, Stephen J Gould. I had to tell him how much I appreciated how he wrote about the human dimension of the misuse of science in the name of racism and eugenics. In one of his books, he writes movingly about a white woman who had been involuntarily sterilized because the leaders of American society had approved this depravity to keep the gene pool “healthy.” Gould gives her the last word.

    Stephen Jay Gould wrote about Buck when she was aged 72 …’ But Doris Buck was never informed [about her sterilization]: ‘I broke down and cried. My husband and me wanted children desperately. We were crazy about them. I never knew what they’d done to me.’

    I have hated bullies all my life. And among those I hate the most are those who claim that they are fucking people over for their own good or for the good of society. And this group includes people of all ideological persuasions.

  16. 16.

    Emma

    May 7, 2015 at 4:19 pm

    If I were chosen God(dess) for a day, I would go after all of those who have “the good of society” in mind. I’m not talking about the people who see a need and try to deal with it; I’m talking about the “big picture” thinkers who have “the answers.” Almost always they’re the ones who think screwing with people’s lives is a wonderful idea.

  17. 17.

    rikyrah

    May 7, 2015 at 4:24 pm

    if true, this is pure, raw EVIL

  18. 18.

    Interrobang

    May 7, 2015 at 4:49 pm

    Unfortunately, I don’t really find this to be news, other than it’s finally coming out that they did this to black women, too. There’s a reason a lot of feminist writers refer to that approximate time period as “The Baby-Snatching Era.” Here in Canada, the National Post did an entire series of articles on forced adoptions between about the 1930s and 1970s, and telling women their babies had died was only one of the tactics they used.

    Perhaps it was hubris of a white-privilege sort that led me and a lot of other people to believe that they only cared enough about sourcing adoptable white babies, that they didn’t bother to, ahem, relieve black teenaged and/or single and/or poor mothers of their infants…

  19. 19.

    boatboy_srq

    May 7, 2015 at 5:09 pm

    @Brachiator: Understood, and shared. Among the things that never cease to amaze me is the FundiEvangelists’ willingness (eagerness, even) to throw away centuries of civil protections – protections that enabled their sect and all the precursor sects before theirs to form and grow – just because they’re convinced they’re right righteous.

  20. 20.

    Roger Moore

    May 7, 2015 at 5:09 pm

    @the Conster:

    just can’t wrap my head around how many people were/are able to rationalize such inhumanity.

    I can wrap my head around it just fine. They rationalize this by telling themselves that the mother wouldn’t do a good job of raising the child, while the adoptive couple will do well. They’re doing the baby a favor by giving it a better family, and that totally justifies lying to the mother and stealing her baby.

  21. 21.

    Brachiator

    May 7, 2015 at 5:55 pm

    @boatboy_srq:

    Understood, and shared. Among the things that never cease to amaze me is the FundiEvangelists’ willingness (eagerness, even) to throw away centuries of civil protections

    Don’t lay this just at the feet of fundamentalists. Conservatives and fundies are currently often at the head of the bus of bad intentions. But this has NEVER been the case for much of our history.

    In the 1920s, the eugenics movement was championed by liberals. Here is the background to the Buck case, from Gould.

    The campaign for forced eugenic sterilization in America reached its climax and height of respectability in 1927, when the Supreme Court, by an 8-1 vote, upheld the Virginia sterilization bill in the case of Buck v. Bell. Oliver Wendell Holmes, then in his mid-eighties and the most celebrated jurist in America, wrote the majority opinion with his customary verve and power of style.

    It included the notorious paragraph, with its chilling tag line, cited ever since as the quintessential statement of eugenic principles. Remembering with pride his own distant experiences as an infantryman in the Civil War, Holmes wrote:

    We have seen more than once that the public welfare may call upon the best citizens for their lives. It would be strange if it could not call upon those who already sap the strength of the state for these lesser sacrifices. . . . It is better for all the world, if instead of waiting to execute degenerate offspring for crime, or to let them starve for their imbecility, society can prevent those who are manifestly unfit from continuing their kind. The principle that sustains compulsory vaccination is broad enough to cover cutting the Fallopian tubes. Three generations of imbeciles are enough.

    Of course, Mrs Buck was normal, and had been misdiagnosed as being mentally defective. But she could not fight an 8-1 Supreme Court decision. She was a nobody.

  22. 22.

    boatboy_srq

    May 8, 2015 at 2:49 pm

    @Brachiator: Question, then: is it that mainstream Christianity has finally begun wising up, or is the rise of the FundiEvangelists merely the congregation of the remaining frothing bigots under one roof?

Comments are closed.

Primary Sidebar

Recent Comments

  • Baud on Late Night Weekend Wrap-Up Open Thread: Journamalism, Not A Dependable Profit Center (Apr 15, 2024 @ 8:03am)
  • Kay on Late Night Weekend Wrap-Up Open Thread: Journamalism, Not A Dependable Profit Center (Apr 15, 2024 @ 8:00am)
  • Joey Maloney on Late Night Weekend Wrap-Up Open Thread: Journamalism, Not A Dependable Profit Center (Apr 15, 2024 @ 7:53am)
  • Kay on Late Night Weekend Wrap-Up Open Thread: Journamalism, Not A Dependable Profit Center (Apr 15, 2024 @ 7:52am)
  • Subsole on Late Night Weekend Wrap-Up Open Thread: Journamalism, Not A Dependable Profit Center (Apr 15, 2024 @ 7:50am)

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Balloon Juice Meetups!

All Meetups
Talk of Meetups – Meetup Planning
Proposed BJ meetups list from frosty

Fundraising 2023-24

Wis*Dems Supreme Court + SD-8
Virginia House Races
Four Directions – Montana
Worker Power AZ
Four Directions – Arizona
Four Directions – Nevada

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
Positive Climate News
War in Ukraine
Cole’s “Stories from the Road”
Classified Documents Primer

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Mailing List Signup
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)

Fix Nyms with Apostrophes

Balloon Juice for Ukraine

Donate

Twitter / Spoutible

Balloon Juice (Spoutible)
WaterGirl (Spoutible)
TaMara (Spoutible)
John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
David Anderson
Major Major Major Major
ActualCitizensUnited

Political Action 2024

Postcard Writing Information

Balloon Juice for Four Directions AZ

Donate

Balloon Juice for Four Directions NV

Donate

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2024 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!