• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

Republicans got rid of McCarthy. Democrats chose not to save him.

Donald Trump, welcome to your everything, everywhere, all at once.

When someone says they “love freedom”, rest assured they don’t mean yours.

Hey Washington Post, “Democracy Dies in Darkness” is supposed to be a warning, not a mission statement.

This really is a full service blog.

Black Jesus loves a paper trail.

The Supreme Court cannot be allowed to become the ultimate, unaccountable arbiter of everything.

The revolution will be supervised.

“Everybody’s entitled to be an idiot.”

Prediction: the gop will rethink its strategy of boycotting future committees.

FFS people, this was a good thing. take the win.

fuckem (in honor of the late great efgoldman)

It’s the corruption, stupid.

Let us savor the impending downfall of lawless scoundrels who richly deserve the trouble barreling their way.

Pessimism assures that nothing of any importance will change.

Today’s gop: why go just far enough when too far is right there?

Marge, god is saying you’re stupid.

Thanks to your bullshit, we are now under siege.

There are a lot more evil idiots than evil geniuses.

Is it irresponsible to speculate? It is irresponsible not to.

Putting aside our relentless self-interest because the moral imperative is crystal clear.

Can we lighten up on the doomsday scenarios?

I was promised a recession.

You can’t attract Republican voters. You can only out organize them.

Mobile Menu

  • Four Directions Montana
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • COVID-19 Coronavirus
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • 2024 Elections
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • Targeted Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Anderson On Health Insurance / July Open Enrollment reminders

July Open Enrollment reminders

by David Anderson|  June 19, 20157:37 am| 9 Comments

This post is in: Anderson On Health Insurance, Readership Capture

FacebookTweetEmail

On the group commercial insurance side of the business, there are two major open enrollment periods.  The first one is a July 1st start date.  Probably a quarter of all commercial groups have policies that start on July 1.  The biggest one is the January 1st start date where over half of all policies start then.  Here are just a couple of things to remember as the open enrollment period for July is coming to a close:

  • Most large employer groups have HR departments that have already done most of the shopping for you.  You’re probably going to be presented with a fairly narrow range of choices that already meet a price criteria set by HR.
  • Are you being forced to shop on a private exchange? These are becoming more common, and usually what it does is offer more choices which segments the risk pool and tilts the subsidization field towards the employer compared to offer a one size fits all approach.
  • Pay attention to the networks.  Networks are getting narrower again as employers are seeing the relative success of the Exchange narrow network and their pricing and employers are asking for better deals.  Networks are usually the easiest way to get better pricing.
  • Pay attention to how your company makes its contribution.  Is it a percentage of total costs?  Do they cover the employee at a high rate and dependents at a low contribution rate?  Do they put money into an HRA or an HSA?  Do they make eating the a big deductible plan somewhat appetizing?
  • What is your health status?  Are you relatively healthy and able to afford a $1,500 surprise expense?  Or do you know that you are either sick or a $1,500 bill sinks you for the year?  If you can afford a surprise, a high deductible plan might be appropriate.
  • Pay attention to how your company is handling same sex marriage versus domestic partner benefits.  In states that have legalized equality and non-bigotry, companies are moving away from domestic partner benefits as all of their employees now can get married to the person that they love.  Companies are looking to trim their costs, so only offering spousal benefits instead of long term partner benefits is an easy trim in non-bigot states.
FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « Friday Morning Open Thread
Next Post: Still Too Early To Know, Probably »

Reader Interactions

9Comments

  1. 1.

    currants

    June 19, 2015 at 8:04 am

    Pay attention to how your company is handling same sex marriage versus domestic partner benefits. In states that have legalized equality and non-bigotry, companies are moving away from domestic partner benefits as all of their employees now can get married to the person that they love. Companies are looking to trim their costs, so only offering spousal benefits instead of long term partner benefits is an easy trim in non-bigot states.

    Ok, so it’s good that some states made up for the difference by offering domestic partner benefits (and in MA, some cities still do for city employees), but SHEEIT. Apologies for the gripe, but the policy/principle that you have to marry the person you love in this country to be treated as if you matter just bugs the freaking crap out of me. Or that in order to get health care you have to GET MARRIED. IMO this is not a same-sex issue, it’s an equal treatment issue. Our gov’t wants people to get married, ESPECIALLY the poors, and I get that it’s policy (see tax, etc) but gawdsalmighty that’s a STUPID STUPID way to go about policy. I know, that’s the way it is here in the land of FREEDUMB but OMG this drives me crazy. So crazy this is really an incoherent rant, when what is called for is a longer, more coherent and well-argued comment, but who’s got time for that? Not me, sorry. Over and out.

    (Apologies, Richard: your posts are unfailingly interesting and informative and I always learn something new–so thank you!)

  2. 2.

    Auntie Anne

    June 19, 2015 at 8:17 am

    Richard – I always learn a great deal from your posts, but I have a question – how do the private exchanges tilt the subsidization towards employers? I get that a relatively healthy person will make different health plan choices than someone with a chronic illness, but I get lost after that. Thanks so much for writing these posts!

  3. 3.

    Gene108

    June 19, 2015 at 8:47 am

    I a disagree that companies are trying to trim their cost.

    When you get stuck with a 15% or 20% increase and a “good year” is considered any premium increase under 10% from the previous year, companies are mostly trying to keep costs neutral in the face of ever rising costs from insurance companies.

  4. 4.

    Richard Mayhew

    June 19, 2015 at 9:02 am

    @Auntie Anne: Scream point management is how they are trying to minimize employer subsidization. Let’s take a scenario where the employer agrees to pay 80% of the premium and there are several Pointy Haired Bosses who are reasonably powerful and not too healthy and who are known to loudly and effectively complain if their docs/hospitals and rehab centers aren’t in the network at low/no cost sharing.

    Under a 1 size fits all policy, part of the selection criteria is making sure that the plan that is picked won’t make those PHBs scream. That probably means the company’s main offering is a low deductible, big network PPO. That is expensive. Most people probably would be okay with a bit less coverage or a narrower network to save on their 20% of the contribution.

    In a private exchange scenario, big network, low deductible PPO is still offered, but there are also narrow network, low deductible PPOs, high deductible plans, EPOs and a bunch of other things that are a bit cheaper but still very good coverage (in ACA terms Gold or better). Most of the people will choose something a bit skimpier than the one size fits all, scream constrained PPO. So the employer will pay less in subsidy for those cheaper plans, most employees will pay less, while the PHBs whose screaming had constrained company plan choice in the past still can get the big networks that they want.

  5. 5.

    Auntie Anne

    June 19, 2015 at 9:49 am

    @Richard Mayhew:

    Ok, that makes sense. I just wasn’t getting it – obviously not enough coffee! My company is in an interesting position this year – we’re moving back from a high deductible plan to offering choice, one of which will probably be a scream constrained PPO. Interestingly enough, it hasn’t been the bosses screaming about the HDHP – it has been the employees. We have a mostly older population, though, and we’re only in our 7th year of requiring any employee contribution at all. It will be interesting to see how this works out.

  6. 6.

    Richard Mayhew

    June 19, 2015 at 10:14 am

    @Auntie Anne: Usually it is the PHB whose screams will be listened to. My experience only has been that the entry level positions and low level experienced staff can scream, but they might not be heard, while the Assistant Director of Paper Clips can yelp and get a reaction.

  7. 7.

    Morat20

    June 19, 2015 at 1:32 pm

    I work for a BIG company (wholly owned subsidiary of a Fortune 500 company type deal), and last year it went entirely to high deductible plans and HSA’s. (Pretty sure we’re self insured, so our ‘choice’ was would we rather be administered by Aetna or Cigna).

    Even choosing the lowest deductible and maxing out my HSA contribution (legal limit) I’ve spent the first six months of this year struggling. It’s been the most stressful, godawful thing my company’s ever done. My wife required minor surgery (don’t even want to get into the in-network/out of network snafu that caused) and it’s not like they front-load my HSA. Sure I can pay myself back at the end of the year, but I had to borrow to cover her surgery and pay tons of costs out of pocket because her surgery ended up being like half my total HSA contribution for the year.

    I’ve been considering changing jobs — from a company I’ve loved and worked for for years now — because this stupid plan has been killing me.

    I’ve got a family, and I can also do math. This change didn’t “save me money” despite my premiums going down. It cost me a TON of money.

    I honestly wish they’d just give me the money they pay towards my premiums and let me shop the exchanges. I’d get a better plan, one that actually fit my needs AND my taste for risk. (I’d rather overpay monthly and avoid giant bills than pay less and occasionally have to fork over larger sums. I prefer predictable costs, even if it’s more expensive).

  8. 8.

    Auntie Anne

    June 19, 2015 at 4:17 pm

    @Morat20:
    This has been my company’s experience as well, including some significant turnover attributed to the HDHP. Most employees who have to use the plan for anything beyond a doctor’s visit feel the same way you do.

  9. 9.

    Morat20

    June 19, 2015 at 6:58 pm

    @Auntie Anne: I’m not exactly a Republican, but I’ll say this: The first six months of this year has created a bone-deep reflex to SCREAM at the words “High deductible plan” and “Healthcare Savings Account” or acronyms thereof.

    I literally, after just six months of this nonsense, could not vote for anyone pushing it as a solution to anything. Honest to God, my dream candidate could come up and that be the ONLY thing he and I disagree on, and I’m pretty sure I’d vote against him or her based solely on that.

    That’s how awful it’s been. Which makes me think that if it’s not just me, maybe the GOP is lucky they never DID manage to replace the ACA with HDP’s. They’d start a revolt.

Comments are closed.

Primary Sidebar

Recent Comments

  • David 🏀Caitlin Clark🏀 Koch on Late Night Weekend Wrap-Up Open Thread: Journamalism, Not A Dependable Profit Center (Apr 15, 2024 @ 6:49am)
  • Baud on Late Night Weekend Wrap-Up Open Thread: Journamalism, Not A Dependable Profit Center (Apr 15, 2024 @ 6:48am)
  • Aussie Sheila on Late Night Weekend Wrap-Up Open Thread: Journamalism, Not A Dependable Profit Center (Apr 15, 2024 @ 6:46am)
  • Subsole on Late Night Weekend Wrap-Up Open Thread: Journamalism, Not A Dependable Profit Center (Apr 15, 2024 @ 6:26am)
  • Subsole on Late Night Weekend Wrap-Up Open Thread: Journamalism, Not A Dependable Profit Center (Apr 15, 2024 @ 6:25am)

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Balloon Juice Meetups!

All Meetups
Talk of Meetups – Meetup Planning
Proposed BJ meetups list from frosty

Fundraising 2023-24

Wis*Dems Supreme Court + SD-8
Virginia House Races
Four Directions – Montana
Worker Power AZ
Four Directions – Arizona
Four Directions – Nevada

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
Positive Climate News
War in Ukraine
Cole’s “Stories from the Road”
Classified Documents Primer

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Mailing List Signup
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)

Fix Nyms with Apostrophes

Balloon Juice for Ukraine

Donate

Twitter / Spoutible

Balloon Juice (Spoutible)
WaterGirl (Spoutible)
TaMara (Spoutible)
John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
David Anderson
Major Major Major Major
ActualCitizensUnited

Political Action 2024

Postcard Writing Information

Balloon Juice for Four Directions AZ

Donate

Balloon Juice for Four Directions NV

Donate

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2024 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!