• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

Be a traveling stable for those who can’t find room at the inn.

Optimism opens the door to great things.

Sitting here in limbo waiting for the dice to roll

I’d like to think you all would remain faithful to me if i ever tried to have some of you killed.

Let’s not be the monsters we hate.

Damn right I heard that as a threat.

After dobbs, women are no longer free.

Battle won, war still ongoing.

The new republican ‘Pastor’ of the House is an odious authoritarian little creep.

Trump makes a mockery of the legal system and cowardly judges just sit back and let him.

Putin must be throwing ketchup at the walls.

Peak wingnut was a lie.

“In the future, this lab will be a museum. don’t touch it.”

I’m more Christian than these people and I’m an atheist.

You’re just a puppy masquerading as an old coot.

You don’t get rid of your umbrella while it’s still raining.

This has so much WTF written all over it that it is hard to comprehend.

There are more Russians standing up to Putin than Republicans.

They’re not red states to be hated; they are voter suppression states to be fixed.

The most dangerous place for a black man in America is in a white man’s imagination.

Nikki Haley, who can’t acknowledge ‘slavery’, is a pathetic shill.

Teach a man to fish, and he’ll sit in a boat all day drinking beer.

The cruelty is the point; the law be damned.

They love authoritarianism, but only when they get to be the authoritarians.

Mobile Menu

  • Four Directions Montana
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • COVID-19 Coronavirus
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • 2024 Elections
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • Targeted Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Anderson On Health Insurance / An interesting paper

An interesting paper

by David Anderson|  October 9, 20159:44 am| 17 Comments

This post is in: Anderson On Health Insurance, Blogospheric Navel-Gazing, Bring On The Meteor

FacebookTweetEmail

Just saw an interesting paper on healthcare innovation waivers/Wyden waivers/Sec 1332 waivers  with the following few paragraphs catching my attention:

Using 1332 waiver authority, states could address one or all of these problems by (1) making coverage more appealingtothe remaining uninsured, (2) increasing affordability for lower- and middle-income enrollees, and (3) minimizing the potential for enrollment in suboptimal plans. To accomplish this, a state could allocate a greater proportion of its tax credits to people more in need, reducing the amount available to those earning closer to four times the povertyline,the cutoff for APTC eligibility. They could also usethat offset to enhance the power of CSRs for income levels where it is weakest. To direct shoppers toward optimal plans, states could make the bronze tier unavailable below 201 percent or 250 percent FPL. Or they could go the other way, attaching CSRs to metal levels other than silver. Exchanges could offer more actuarial levels by calculating the subsidy formula, using the total cost of a policy instead of the premium only (Mayhew 2015).  [my emphasis]  However, behavioral research shows that more choice is not always better (Frakt 2013). Moreover, actuarial level, metal tier, and cost-sharing reductions do not interact intuitively. An exchange could scrap the metal system, where, confusingly, a silver plan is markedly more valuable than a gold plan for somebody near the poverty line and where a gold plan appears more inherently desirable than a silver plan in general (Ubel, Comerford, and Johnson 2015).

Actually it is a really good overview of the 1332 waiver process and option space….

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « Friday Morning Open Thread: Quixotic
Next Post: You Get Ore-Gone »

Reader Interactions

17Comments

  1. 1.

    Punchy

    October 9, 2015 at 10:03 am

    Textbook humble brag.

  2. 2.

    RSA

    October 9, 2015 at 10:03 am

    Nice!

  3. 3.

    David Koch

    October 9, 2015 at 10:06 am

    have you written anything on the Cadillac tax?

    How many union members will be effected by it (5%, 10%)?

    Do you agree with Vox that scrapping it to pander to unions is a bad policy?

  4. 4.

    Richard Mayhew

    October 9, 2015 at 10:09 am

    @Punchy: fuck no, just a straight up brag, nothing humble about it :)

  5. 5.

    NCSteve

    October 9, 2015 at 10:15 am

    Dude. People near 400% FPL need more help, a lot more. Not less. Both politically and in terms of real life need, putting the subsidy phaseout here instead finding the money to do that at some higher arbitrary point, like 500 or 600, was a major fuckup. It was a fuckup perpetrated in the utterly futile hope of getting a Republican to vote for it, as is most everything else that’s wrong with the ACA that isn’t John Roberts’ fault.

    At 400% FPL, a family is in a financial situation that is remarkably parallel to that of a family at 200%. Every dollar earned has multiple creditors’ hands on it before it comes through the door, every day is a struggle, often a losing one, not to fall further behind, every day is lived under a pall of fear that some unexpected four digit expense will fall out of the sky. At 400% FPL, you have the same despair that you can ever make your kids’ lives better than it is right now as all of those earning less. You have more and better stuff, but with the gigantic difference of food security, the stress and fear is the same. And the menace of that slippery slide down to 200 or 100 or worse is always there, longer but much steeper.

    Telling those people they had to tighten up their belts and come up with several thousand dollars to buy unsubsidized insurance was a moral error and a major self-inflicted political clusterfuck. And ensuring that demographic specifically would be, at best, ambivalent about the ACA was a major gain of the multi-month tease the so-called “moderate” Republicans did. It was a perfect demonstration of how utterly disconnected our millionaire Congress members are from the lives of the “ordinary Americans” they profess to treasure. And preventing the Democrats from addressing that problem is, whether intentionally or otherwise, a political major benefit the Republicans have scored from their Massive Resistance” campaign.

  6. 6.

    Face

    October 9, 2015 at 10:26 am

    But who among Frakt, Ubel, Comerford, or Johnson has banged the center back?

  7. 7.

    Richard Mayhew

    October 9, 2015 at 10:36 am

    @David Koch: I’ve not written a lot about it:

    https://balloon-juice.com/2014/03/26/cadillac-mechanics/ (mechanics post) is about the most I’ve written.

    And yes, I agree with Vox, removing Cadillac without replacing it with something that makes high cost plans less attractive (there are a few options) is a really dumb idea but politically it is a very tempting idea as the costs are dispersed (higher medical price inflation) and benefits very concentrated on groups that both parties hear and listen to.

  8. 8.

    Richard Mayhew

    October 9, 2015 at 10:36 am

    @Face: I did not either, I just heard about it and received a 12 pack of Dog Fish Head because someone banged the center back

  9. 9.

    Gin & Tonic

    October 9, 2015 at 10:42 am

    @Richard Mayhew: At least if you weren’t getting some action, you got good beer out of it.

  10. 10.

    ruemara

    October 9, 2015 at 10:45 am

    It was English, but I couldn’t understand it. Of what I could grab the jist of, I support anything that helps people in my situation, since i fit the “too poor for this, but too rich for help” thing.

  11. 11.

    benw

    October 9, 2015 at 10:56 am

    @Face: Johnson, of course.

    @Richard Mayhew: “12 pack of Dog Fish Head” What, you’re too good for a case of Bud? Commie.

  12. 12.

    Richard mayhew

    October 9, 2015 at 11:06 am

    @benw: either a 12 of something good, or a pony keg of bud. I need to keep my in season weight down , so quality over quantity

  13. 13.

    BobS

    October 9, 2015 at 11:07 am

    Mr. Mayhew, I’m sorry to bother you with a question unrelated to your post but… an old friend of mine (and his wife) get their health insurance through his employer — as I understand it, the cost is charged to his gross income and he pays somewhat more to have both he and his wife covered than if it were just him. However, because his wife is offered (and declines) coverage by her employer, his employer charges him an additional fee. Apparently this policy was begun soon after implementation of the ACA and consequently he blames ObamaCare for the extra $120/month he’s being charged after already paying for spousal coverage. Is this in fact a stipulation of the ACA, or is his employer just taking advantage of the timing to gouge him for a few dollars more? Thanks in advance for your answer.

  14. 14.

    Richard Mayhew

    October 9, 2015 at 11:13 am

    @BobS: Good question

    It is not ACA related at all except by coincidental timing. Employers have been trying to reduce their covered head count as much as they can because insurance is expensive and they want to reduce their costs.

    His employer’s logic is that they need to offer spousal coverage as a general benefit of employment, but they really don’t want to cover spouses who are coverable elsewhere. That is why they are two tiering it — first tier is 2X (X for employer only coverage) for stay at home spouses or spouses working as free lancers or working at shitty jobs, and then 2X+$120 for spouses who work at companies that offer less good insurance. The goal is to get the spouse who works at a company with less good insurance to stay there as the better/richer benefit at the offering employer is not $120/month better.

    My wife’s company does this. Thankfully my company does not so I have the entire family on my coverage, but if Mayhew Insurance added $75/.$100 surcharge, my wife will go to her employer coverage.

  15. 15.

    BobS

    October 9, 2015 at 11:32 am

    @Richard Mayhew: Thanks again — I’ll let him know to direct whatever ire he may have toward his employer instead of at Obama and the Democrats.

  16. 16.

    Richard Mayhew

    October 9, 2015 at 12:48 pm

    @BobS: Good chance that I am turning this comment exchange into a post for next week as it is a good question.

Comments are closed.

Trackbacks

  1. Spousal fees for Employer Sponsored Coverage » Balloon Juice says:
    October 19, 2015 at 8:11 am

    […] Bob S asked about something that is becoming increasingly common: […]

Primary Sidebar

Recent Comments

  • WaterGirl on Arizona In The Crosshairs (Apr 17, 2024 @ 11:40am)
  • Baud on Wednesday Morning Open Thread: The GOP Insists There Will Be Blood Impeachment (Apr 17, 2024 @ 11:40am)
  • Jharp on Arizona In The Crosshairs (Apr 17, 2024 @ 11:39am)
  • satby on Wednesday Morning Open Thread: The GOP Insists There Will Be Blood Impeachment (Apr 17, 2024 @ 11:39am)
  • schrodingers_cat on Wednesday Morning Open Thread: The GOP Insists There Will Be Blood Impeachment (Apr 17, 2024 @ 11:38am)

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Balloon Juice Meetups!

All Meetups
Talk of Meetups – Meetup Planning
Proposed BJ meetups list from frosty

Fundraising 2023-24

Wis*Dems Supreme Court + SD-8
Virginia House Races
Four Directions – Montana
Worker Power AZ
Four Directions – Arizona
Four Directions – Nevada

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
Positive Climate News
War in Ukraine
Cole’s “Stories from the Road”
Classified Documents Primer

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Mailing List Signup
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)

Fix Nyms with Apostrophes

Balloon Juice for Ukraine

Donate

Twitter / Spoutible

Balloon Juice (Spoutible)
WaterGirl (Spoutible)
TaMara (Spoutible)
John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
David Anderson
Major Major Major Major
ActualCitizensUnited

Political Action 2024

Postcard Writing Information

Balloon Juice for Four Directions AZ

Donate

Balloon Juice for Four Directions NV

Donate

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2024 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!