• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

Meanwhile over at truth Social, the former president is busy confessing to crimes.

The words do not have to be perfect.

Republicans don’t want a speaker to lead them; they want a hostage.

Balloon Juice has never been a refuge for the linguistically delicate.

I like you, you’re my kind of trouble.

… pundit janitors mopping up after the GOP

They traffic in fear. it is their only currency. if we are fearful, they are winning.

Peak wingnut was a lie.

If you tweet it in all caps, that makes it true!

I’d like to think you all would remain faithful to me if i ever tried to have some of you killed.

I’d hate to be the candidate who lost to this guy.

Shallow, uninformed, and lacking identity

A last alliance of elves and men. also pet photos.

Is it irresponsible to speculate? It is irresponsible not to.

Is it negotiation when the other party actually wants to shoot the hostage?

If you are still in the GOP, you are an extremist.

This blog will pay for itself.

Damn right I heard that as a threat.

Not all heroes wear capes.

I did not have this on my fuck 2022 bingo card.

An almost top 10,000 blog!

This fight is for everything.

The poor and middle-class pay taxes, the rich pay accountants, the wealthy pay politicians.

They’re not red states to be hated; they are voter suppression states to be fixed.

Mobile Menu

  • Winnable House Races
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • Balloon Juice 2023 Pet Calendar (coming soon)
  • COVID-19 Coronavirus
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • War in Ukraine
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • 2021-22 Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Anderson On Health Insurance / Obamacare a failure or Obamacare a success

Obamacare a failure or Obamacare a success

by David Anderson|  October 21, 201512:04 pm| 31 Comments

This post is in: Anderson On Health Insurance, #notintendedtobeafactualstatement, All we want is life beyond the thunderdome, Blogospheric Navel-Gazing, Both Sides Do It!, Bring On The Meteor

FacebookTweetEmail

Conservative healthcare connector and wonk Robert Laszewski on the failure of Obamacare:

On Thursday, the Obama administration said they expect to have 10 million people enrolled on the Obamacare insurance exchanges in 2016. They further said they expect to sign-up only one in four of those still uninsured and eligible during the 2016 open enrollment scheduled to begin on November 1.

These are astonishing admissions.

In 2013 the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) estimated that the Obamacare insurance exchanges would enroll an average of 22 million people during 2016.

Given the original expectations how can we now not say this program is a terrible failure?

Note how he elides Medicaid expansion as a means of coverage and collapses all of PPACA to the Exchanges. This rhetorical trick is a kissing cousin of the discussion about total tax burden by income decile collapsing into a discussion of top marginal federal income tax rates by income decile.

Kevin Drum on the success of Obamacare:

 In 2010, just after Obamacare passed, CBO estimated that the uninsured rate would hit 8 percent by 2016. This was based on the original law, but in 2012 the Supreme Court made Medicaid expansion voluntary and most red states opted out. In July CBO updated its projections to account for this, increasing its estimate of uninsured by three percentage points. The next CBO estimate thus projected that the uninsured rate would be 11 percent by 2016. So how does that compare to reality? In its most recent survey, the CDC estimates that in the first quarter of 2015 the actual number of uninsured clocked in at 10.7 percent, and that’s likely to decline to about 10 percent or so by the end of 2016.

In other words, once you clear away all the underbrush it looks like Obamacare is meeting or beating its goals.

The overall objective of PPACA is to reduce the uninsurance rate while at least reducing if not eliminating medical cost growth over the general rate of economic growth in the country.

The Exchanges are seeing less people because a lot more people are still on Employer Sponsored Coverage (ESI).  The CBO originally projected that quite a few employers would eat the employee mandate penalty and dump ESI coverage to send their employees onto the Exchanges.  That has not happened.  PPACA is less disruptive than originally projected while still meeting or slightly beating its goals.

 

 

 

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « The Burning Question In Ferguson
Next Post: Biden Continues to Not Run for President, Makes it Official »

Reader Interactions

31Comments

  1. 1.

    BGinCHI

    October 21, 2015 at 12:08 pm

    Republicans lied, people died.

    Obama passed HC reform law, people got much-needed coverage and their lives were made better.

    Both sides do it.

  2. 2.

    Richard Mayhew

    October 21, 2015 at 12:13 pm

    @BGinCHI: Of course, the optics of the policy matter not the policy itself, Obamacare was just so messy to pass and people are still shouting, so it must be bad….

  3. 3.

    1weirdTrick

    October 21, 2015 at 12:14 pm

    He’s a subject-matter-expert… and yet there’re obviously so many cushy berths on the wing nut gravy train that Laszewski is willing to throw away his reputation for expertise just to tell the anti-Obamacare crowd what it wants to hear?

  4. 4.

    raven

    October 21, 2015 at 12:18 pm

    No Joe, I like him even more now.

    eta “Democrats should RUN on the Obama record”!

  5. 5.

    Elizabelle

    October 21, 2015 at 12:19 pm

    Laszewski is a honk, not a wonk.

    And what a tragedy that more states did not expand Medicaid. Would be a win-win all around, except for nasty “conservative” ideology.

  6. 6.

    dmsilev

    October 21, 2015 at 12:20 pm

    @raven: Just saw that. It was the right decision. He’s done good as VP, but the stars weren’t aligned for a run for the big seat.

  7. 7.

    Patrick

    October 21, 2015 at 12:20 pm

    Note how he elides Medicaid expansion as a means of coverage and collapses all of PPACA to the Exchanges. This rhetorical trick is a kissing cousin of the discussion about total tax burden by income decile collapsing into a discussion of top marginal federal income tax rates by income decile.

    Great posting!

    I wish the media in DC was as clear in pointing out BS.

  8. 8.

    raven

    October 21, 2015 at 12:21 pm

    @dmsilev: He doesn’t need this shit, he’s given enough.

  9. 9.

    dmsilev

    October 21, 2015 at 12:22 pm

    @raven: And, as a bonus, we get to experience the anguish of the political press being deprived of their latest Shiny Object.

  10. 10.

    Keith G

    October 21, 2015 at 12:22 pm

    @raven: Biden said, “The window had closed.” A very astute observation.

  11. 11.

    raven

    October 21, 2015 at 12:22 pm

    @Keith G: He may not always be the most articulate but he knows what’s up.

  12. 12.

    Xantar

    October 21, 2015 at 12:23 pm

    Even a lot of liberals seem to ignore the Medicaid expansion when talking about Obamacare, as if it only consisted of the health exchanges. Here in Maryland, half of the people who get new insurance are doing so through the Medicaid expansion. Why not crow about that in your numbers?

  13. 13.

    SarahT

    October 21, 2015 at 12:27 pm

    @raven: Yup. Thanks, VP Biden – doing the right thing.

  14. 14.

    SenyoDave

    October 21, 2015 at 12:28 pm

    @raven: A smart, down-to-earth guy. I think he would have been a good president 15 – 20 years ago, but he is correct that the window has closed. Hopefully he’ll do some serious campaigning in 2016 for the nominee. He’s a good guy to send to purple states, I think a lot of middle class folks can identify with him.

  15. 15.

    raven

    October 21, 2015 at 12:28 pm

    Nice speech Joe.

  16. 16.

    Matt McIrvin

    October 21, 2015 at 12:30 pm

    @Xantar: Maybe because it would make it clearer that many of the people who are still uninsured are uninsured specifically because of governors refusing to expand Medicaid. “Stop hitting yourself, Obamacare!” is not the winningest argument.

  17. 17.

    NonyNony

    October 21, 2015 at 12:31 pm

    The CBO originally projected that quite a few employers would eat the employee mandate penalty and dump ESI coverage to send their employees onto the Exchanges. That has not happened.

    So now the follow-up question I’d like to ask is “why not”?

    Was the CBO just making a “worst case scenario” judgment, or did they actually misjudge how good for the bottom line kicking the employees off onto the exchanges would actually be?

  18. 18.

    benw

    October 21, 2015 at 12:31 pm

    @Elizabelle: The failure to expand Medicaid is like a greatest hits of all the shit that make me tear at my hair. From the awfulness of the Robert’s court and it’s individual conservatives, to the Democrats losing so much political power at the State level, to the wanton cruelty of self-proclaimed Christian politicians not helping the sick and needy for obviously ideological or self-interested reasons, to the fecklessness of the national media who refuses to cover this as the tragedy it is. Urgh.

  19. 19.

    srv

    October 21, 2015 at 12:31 pm

    Seems like a lot of fuzzy math and moving the goalposts.

    What were the original exchange vs expansion projections?

  20. 20.

    NonyNony

    October 21, 2015 at 12:33 pm

    @Xantar:

    Why not crow about that in your numbers?

    While Republicans are angry about the existence of the social safety net, Democrats are embarrassed by it. They don’t tout their successes with expanding it because they’re afraid of the backlash from “regular voters” who see it as people getting “free stuff”.

  21. 21.

    Keith G

    October 21, 2015 at 12:35 pm

    @raven: I often wondered if those outside of Biden’s circle who were stroking the speculation had watched the Colbert interview. That was a guy who looked like choosing a restaurant was too much of an arduous decision – and I say that not out of viciousness, but an acknowledgement of the pain that was so obvious.

  22. 22.

    jl

    October 21, 2015 at 12:35 pm

    Thanks for a useful post debunking misleading analysis.

    Also thanks to commenters for pointing out the end of the Biden drama of the millennium. I don’t want to guess whether Biden’s decision is good or bad. Who knows, maybe Gowdy will produce a photo of HRC signing a pact with SATAN!! at the hearing tomorrow and her campaign will go down in flames. Or, maybe not.

    But, whatever, if the campaign needs Biden as savior, he can always be drafted later. Better for now to keep focus on HRC and Sanders contest (keeping mind that HRC still most likely to be nominee by far).

  23. 23.

    cmorenc

    October 21, 2015 at 12:36 pm

    The central failure of Obamacare to conservatives is deeply ideological, that it’s a classic disruptive government intrusion into economic market decisions by insurers and health-care providers and decision options by private individuals, and therefore it cannot by ideological definition succeed, and so there’s an extremely strong bias to search for ways to frame data in ways consistent with proving those points. Unsurprisingly, that sort of analysis is prone to missing the forest for the selectively-chosen trees – and often not even choosing the most practically important aspects of the trees, because they’re focused on finding purported pests afflicting those trees and not whether the trees are nevertheless in fact healthy. And that’s without considering the deeply dishonest use conservative politicians make of such analysis by conservative-minded academics.

  24. 24.

    goblue72

    October 21, 2015 at 12:41 pm

    @srv: Have you stopped molesting goats?

  25. 25.

    BillinGlendaleCA

    October 21, 2015 at 12:47 pm

    @jl: Now the only question is if the media will stop including Handsome Joe in their polls.

  26. 26.

    Richard mayhew

    October 21, 2015 at 1:06 pm

    @BillinGlendaleCA: has the hrc bids increased to the mid 90s yet

  27. 27.

    Gene108

    October 21, 2015 at 1:20 pm

    @NonyNony:

    I am guessing inertia. Businesses do not change unless something big forces a change and the PPACA has not been very disruptive.

  28. 28.

    Gene108

    October 21, 2015 at 1:25 pm

    @cmorenc:

    I thnk it is simpler. Obamacare taxes the rich a bit more and gives benefits to the poor. This is the worst thing government can do.

  29. 29.

    mkro

    October 21, 2015 at 1:38 pm

    Robert Laszewski is the perfect example of how Libs can be very gullible. Ezra Klein named Laszewski “Pundit of the Year” a few years ago when the Exchanges launched. Even Charles Gabba still treats Laszewski like he’s a non-partisan healthcare wonk.

  30. 30.

    Elie

    October 21, 2015 at 1:57 pm

    Yes, Richard, thanks for this informative post. As many have said, I just shake my head on the very real tragedy of State failure to expand Medicaid. I would go further — it is sinful — evil even, to withhold access to care to make a political point on the backs of those who can least fight back or have other alternatives. What kind of soul sleeps at night who would want that? Nevermind. We know. I have to keep reminding myself of the function of progressivism — the need to keep leaning into issues and courage and pride to keep moving the rock, keep putting our shoulders into it, expecting, even sometimes relishing the scars and sometimes the blood, on the many shoulders pushing this thing forward and up.

  31. 31.

    gelfling545

    October 21, 2015 at 3:30 pm

    @raven: They certainly should. Running away from it in the mid-terms only got us a Republican Senate. Don’t support the President & then be surprised that his supporters don’t turn out for you. Hmmm. What could possibly be wrong there?

Comments are closed.

Primary Sidebar

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

2023 Pet Calendars

Pet Calendar Preview: A
Pet Calendar Preview: B

*Calendars can not be ordered until Cafe Press gets their calendar paper in.

Recent Comments

  • bjacques on Late Night Open Thread: All Mah Gapes Gone! (Jan 28, 2023 @ 6:05am)
  • Geminid on War for Ukraine Day 337: International Holocaust Remembrance Day Amidst Another Genocidal War in Europe (Jan 28, 2023 @ 5:59am)
  • Aussie Sheila on Late Night Open Thread: All Mah Gapes Gone! (Jan 28, 2023 @ 5:58am)
  • NotMax on Late Night Open Thread: All Mah Gapes Gone! (Jan 28, 2023 @ 5:54am)
  • Joey Maloney on Late Night Open Thread: All Mah Gapes Gone! (Jan 28, 2023 @ 5:36am)

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
We All Need A Little Kindness
Favorite Dogs & Cats
Classified Documents: A Primer

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Mailing List Signup

Front-pager Twitter

John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
TaMara
David Anderson
ActualCitizensUnited

Shop Amazon via this link to support Balloon Juice   

Join the Fight!

Join the Fight Signup Form
All Join the Fight Posts

Balloon Juice Events

5/14  The Apocalypse
5/20  Home Away from Home
5/29  We’re Back, Baby
7/21  Merging!

Balloon Juice for Ukraine

Donate

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2023 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!