• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

That’s my take and I am available for criticism at this time.

Nancy smash is sick of your bullshit.

Republicans would impeach Biden if he bit into a whole Kit Kat rather than breaking the sections apart.

Republicans are the party of chaos and catastrophe.

An almost top 10,000 blog!

There is no right way to do the wrong thing.

I’m pretty sure there’s only one Jack Smith.

Jesus, Mary, & Joseph how is that election even close?

There are no moderate republicans – only extremists and cowards.

Roe isn’t about choice, it’s about freedom.

Maybe you would prefer that we take Joelle’s side in ALL CAPS?

You are so fucked. Still, I wish you the best of luck.

Take hopelessness and turn it into resilience.

It’s easier to kill a dangerous animal than a man who just happens to have different thoughts/values than one’s own.

You don’t get rid of your umbrella while it’s still raining.

Donald Trump, welcome to your everything, everywhere, all at once.

Their boy Ron is an empty plastic cup that will never know pudding.

Narcissists are always shocked to discover other people have agency.

Nothing worth doing is easy.

It’s not hopeless, and we’re not helpless.

Republicans don’t want a speaker to lead them; they want a hostage.

Not all heroes wear capes.

Another missed opportunity for Jamie Dimon to just shut the fuck up.

Sitting here in limbo waiting for the dice to roll

Mobile Menu

  • Four Directions Montana
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • COVID-19 Coronavirus
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • 2024 Elections
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • Targeted Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Anderson On Health Insurance / Transfer pricing and MLR manipulation

Transfer pricing and MLR manipulation

by David Anderson|  December 2, 20158:48 am| 10 Comments

This post is in: Anderson On Health Insurance

FacebookTweetEmail

The Medical Loss Ratio (MLR) in PPACA is supposed to keep insurers honest.  They are expected to spend either 80% (small group and individual markets) or 85% (large group) of premium dollars on medical claims and quality improvement activities.  The goal was to keep insurers honest as they could not just raise rates to make more money if they weren’t paying more out in claims. MLR can be gamed aggressively by integrated delivery systems.   If an insurer has a business segment that goes under the MLR, the insurer sends out rebate checks to drop net premiums to a point where the MLR is met.

This logic works very well for entities that are solely insurers such as Aetna or UHC or Cigna.  It is a fairly easy calculation as claim dollars plus certain quality improvement dollars can be added up and divided by premium revenue.  There are ways to game the system on the quality improvement side but it is a fairly reliable metric that gives useful information to consumers and regulators.

The logic is fundamentally irrelevant for integrated payer providers that operate behind a closed gate like Kaiser in California.  Kaiser gets money in, and pays it staff to do stuff.  The medical expenses are almost all internal expenses (limited claims dollars go out of Kaiser for out of area emergency care, transplants and a few other high end services).  Kaiser’s MLR is calculated as the sum of external claims spend plus internal claims spend that is priced by internal methods plus quality improvement divided by total revenue.  The internal claims spend is fuzzy as the transfer pricing is variable.

However Kaiser is not the issue that I am thinking about as they are odd in that they are mostly a closed garden in some areas.

Most integrated payer-provider systems are not like Kaiser in California. Instead they are an  insurer, a hospital system, primary care and specialty providers and a lot of ancillary services. The  insurance network also has numerous high volume, high claim value external providers.  The MLR is calculated as internal claim costs plus external claim costs plus quality improvement divided by net premiums.  Internal provider costs from the point of view of the insurance side of the integrated system should be calculated as if it was an arms length transaction, but the potential for mischief is out there.

Let’s take the following scenario.  

The insurance company realizes that its spend is projected to be $5 million dollars below the needed level to hit the desired non-rebate paying MLR.  What could an insurer do to minimize rebates?

A company that is only an insurer might look at that problem and figure they’ll pour some money into a quality improvement initiative that had been on the wish list for a couple of years but never funded in order to max out the allowable QI allowance.  They could  buy a little bit of goodwill from a provider by not fighting as hard on a disputed billing practice or the Hep-C cure authorization process could loosen up to cover F-2 patients as well as the current F-3 and F-4 patients.  Finally, the insurer could write refund checks.

Open integrated payer provider systems have all of the same options plus one more; fooling around with internal transfer pricing models so that the provider side of the business charges the payer side of the business $5 million dollars more.  This could be done as easily by increasing the contracted rate due to some “unforeseen” shock to the pricing structure.  If the integrated payer-provider system is based on a high end hospital, it could be done by diverting low complexity surgeries from non-owned community hospitals to higher cost owned specialty hospitals.  If the goal is to move money on the individual provider side instead of the facility side, gain sharing agreements could be created where the target MER where bonuses start to get paid is inflated to a point where a $5 million bonus is guaranteed.

These are just some of the easy ways to use internal transfer pricing to game MLR for an integrated payer-provider system that has an open network.  I’ve not had my coffee yet this morning, so I am sure there are others.  These games don’t matter at insurance companies that are only insurers, and they are fundamentally irrelevant at closed garden integrated payer-providers, but the quality of information conveyed by the MLR at open network integrated payer providers is very low as it is too easy to marginally game.

 

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « Wednesday Morning Open Thread: Retreads v Revivals
Next Post: Is Anita Alvarez doing it again? »

Reader Interactions

10Comments

  1. 1.

    David Fud

    December 2, 2015 at 9:18 am

    Are you referring to Kaiser Permanente and the like? Does it matter that they are theoretically non-profit?

  2. 2.

    Big R

    December 2, 2015 at 9:42 am

    Just finished reading Baumgartner and Jones’ book on entropic versus expert information, and saw something I recognized from your work – HHI! In this case, used as a measure of information diversity, rather than a measure of market concentration. B&J make the point that HHI began life as you use it – a measure of market concentration. They note that an alternative measure (Shannon’s H) does a better job of distinguishing between situations where there is low concentration.

    My question is this: have you considered looking at your 2×2 payer/provider model using Shannon’s H to break out that bottom right box (low/low) more granularly? Could it change your results?

  3. 3.

    Mathguy

    December 2, 2015 at 10:32 am

    Richard–Thanks for all of these posts on health insurance. I worked as a life actuary for a few years and know a few of the ins and outs, but your series has been superb. Gaining some understanding of the complexities of health insurance has been very beneficial.

    Also, moar sexy time in the futbol stuff!

  4. 4.

    Richard Mayhew

    December 2, 2015 at 10:40 am

    @Big R: i have no idea, let me do some research on Shannon’s H as I don’t know enough (really anything) about that tool

  5. 5.

    Richard Mayhew

    December 2, 2015 at 11:01 am

    @Big R: Doing a fast read on the Shannon index, I don’t think it provides too much insight at a 30,000 foot level when both the payers and providers are very fragmented. There are definitely different flavors of split markets and if I was a network development guy for an insurance company or a contract management fellow for a provider group, I think the Shannon H could provide some insight/actionable information, but I am not running scenarios through my head that have significantly different large policy differences between simple HHI and Shannon H for this quadrant.

    I think Shannon H would be much more useful at the High-Lo and Lo-High quadrants as there the granularity matters and it could have significant impact on what solutions anti-trust regulators pursue.

  6. 6.

    Richard Mayhew

    December 2, 2015 at 11:02 am

    @David Fud: Yep, Kaiser in California is a special snowflake in the US healthcare system.

    It really does not matter that they are non-profit, they still don’t like sending money out the door when they can avoid it.

  7. 7.

    lawtalkinguy

    December 2, 2015 at 12:51 pm

    I am an attorney who has handled a lot of cases against Kaiser for bad faith. They are unique. But when talking about Kaiser, it should be understood that there are three separate Kaiser entities (actually four technically, but three that are involved with a given members care), that make up the Kaiser system. There is Kaiser Foundation Health Plan (Health Plan). That is the insurer, and it is a non-profit. Health Plan then contracts with The Permanente Medical Group (TPMG). They are the physicians. There are actually two medical groups, one that covers all of northern California, and one that covers southern California. Then the Health Plan contracts with Kaiser Hospitals and Clinics to provide all the medical facilities and staff.

    While the Health Plan and, I believe, the Hospitals, are non-profit, TPMG is very much for profit. The agreement between Health Plan and TPMG provides payment on a capitated basis. There is a formula based upon the total number of members, and that is the base compensation. However, where the “non-profit” Health Plan has money in excess of its operating expenses, what is otherwise known as profit, that money gets shared with the TPMG, who disperses is as bonuses to the physicians.

    I should note that the agreements I have seen and the information I have precedes the ACA. However, the system as it was before was already designed to provide a mechanism for maintaining certain level of spending on health care, because any money transferred to TPMG would be considered health care spending, even if just used to provide doctors bonuses.

    Apart from whether this arrangement is gaming the ACA’s MLR system, it definitely affects the quality of health care, and creates perverse incentives for physicians. The less medical services the physicians provide, the more money they make. Further, the Health Plan contracts with TPMG to provide utilization review services, so TPMG is actually not only serving as the physician, but also the insurance adjuster. But your doctor should not be your insurance adjuster. I understand that in today’s world, there has to be some cost control, and some of that has to come from the doctor in how they provide treatment, but the doctor’s ultimate recommendation must be what is medically necessary, without the concern of how it affects their bonus.

  8. 8.

    Richard Mayhew

    December 2, 2015 at 2:22 pm

    @lawtalkinguy: And that is the key:

    I should note that the agreements I have seen and the information I have precedes the ACA. However, the system as it was before was already designed to provide a mechanism for maintaining certain level of spending on health care, because any money transferred to TPMG would be considered health care spending, even if just used to provide doctors bonuses.

    Or better hookers and more blow — the entire Kaiser model is ripe for internal transfer pricing shenanigans for MLR, they don’t need to play games because their structure already does it without thought.

  9. 9.

    Cheap Jim, formerly Cheap Jim

    December 2, 2015 at 3:13 pm

    I live in Maryland and am enrolled with Kaiser. Man, those trips to California just to see the doctor are tiring.

  10. 10.

    mclaren

    December 2, 2015 at 6:17 pm

    More incomprehensible alphabet-soup gobbledygook from Richard Mayhew.

    Once again, people, Richard Mayhew is lying to you.

    Obama administration officials, urging people to sign up for health insurance under the Affordable Care Act, have trumpeted the low premiums available on the law’s new marketplaces.
    From Our Advertisers

    But for many consumers, the sticker shock is coming not on the front end, when they purchase the plans, but on the back end when they get sick: sky-high deductibles that are leaving some newly insured feeling nearly as vulnerable as they were before they had coverage.

    “The deductible, $3,000 a year, makes it impossible to actually go to the doctor,” said David R. Reines, 60, of Jefferson Township, N.J., a former hardware salesman with chronic knee pain. “We have insurance, but can’t afford to use it.”

    “Many Say High Deductibles Make Their Health Law Insurance All but Useless,” The New York Times, 14 November 2015.

Comments are closed.

Primary Sidebar

Recent Comments

  • Trollhattan on Arizona In The Crosshairs (Apr 17, 2024 @ 11:38am)
  • TBone on Wednesday Morning Open Thread: The GOP Insists There Will Be Blood Impeachment (Apr 17, 2024 @ 11:37am)
  • Old School on Arizona In The Crosshairs (Apr 17, 2024 @ 11:34am)
  • db11 on Wednesday Morning Open Thread: The GOP Insists There Will Be Blood Impeachment (Apr 17, 2024 @ 11:34am)
  • Soprano2 on Wednesday Morning Open Thread: The GOP Insists There Will Be Blood Impeachment (Apr 17, 2024 @ 11:32am)

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Balloon Juice Meetups!

All Meetups
Talk of Meetups – Meetup Planning
Proposed BJ meetups list from frosty

Fundraising 2023-24

Wis*Dems Supreme Court + SD-8
Virginia House Races
Four Directions – Montana
Worker Power AZ
Four Directions – Arizona
Four Directions – Nevada

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
Positive Climate News
War in Ukraine
Cole’s “Stories from the Road”
Classified Documents Primer

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Mailing List Signup
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)

Fix Nyms with Apostrophes

Balloon Juice for Ukraine

Donate

Twitter / Spoutible

Balloon Juice (Spoutible)
WaterGirl (Spoutible)
TaMara (Spoutible)
John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
David Anderson
Major Major Major Major
ActualCitizensUnited

Political Action 2024

Postcard Writing Information

Balloon Juice for Four Directions AZ

Donate

Balloon Juice for Four Directions NV

Donate

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2024 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!