• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

Take hopelessness and turn it into resilience.

Their freedom requires your slavery.

New McCarthy, same old McCarthyism.

Putting aside our relentless self-interest because the moral imperative is crystal clear.

rich, arrogant assholes who equate luck with genius

This blog will pay for itself.

JFC, are there no editors left at that goddamn rag?

fuckem (in honor of the late great efgoldman)

Shallow, uninformed, and lacking identity

Whatever happens next week, the fight doesn’t end.

The revolution will be supervised.

“Squeaker” McCarthy

You don’t get rid of your umbrella while it’s still raining.

… riddled with inexplicable and elementary errors of law and fact

Seems like a complicated subject, have you tried yelling at it?

“What are Republicans afraid of?” Everything.

Some judge needs to shut this circus down soon.

🎶 Those boots were made for mockin’ 🎵

We still have time to mess this up!

They love authoritarianism, but only when they get to be the authoritarians.

Come on, media. you have one job. start doing it.

Let there be snark.

Make the republican party small enough to drown in a bathtub.

Insiders who complain to politico: please report to the white house office of shut the fuck up.

Mobile Menu

  • Winnable House Races
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • Balloon Juice 2023 Pet Calendar (coming soon)
  • COVID-19 Coronavirus
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • War in Ukraine
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • 2021-22 Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Open Threads / Yelling at assistant referees

Yelling at assistant referees

by David Anderson|  January 19, 20176:53 am| 18 Comments

This post is in: Open Threads

FacebookTweetEmail

538 has a good piece on the implicit bias referees have when they get yelled at in NFL games:

a sideline bias in the NFL is real, and it’s spectacular. To prove it, we looked at the rates at which refs call the NFL’s most severe penalties, including defensive pass interference, aggressive infractions like personal fouls and unnecessary roughness, and offensive holding calls, based on where the offensive team ran its play.1…

For three common penalties, the direction of the play — that is, whether it’s run toward the offensive or defensive team’s sideline — makes a significant difference. In other words, refs make more defensive pass interference calls on the offensive team’s sideline but more offensive holding calls on the defensive team’s sideline. What’s more, these differences aren’t uniform across the field — the effect only shows up on plays run, roughly, between the 32-yard lines, the same space where coaches and players are allowed to stand during play.

Speaking as a referee, this makes intuitive sense. And it is a logical extension of the massive amount of research that shows crowd noise is a major factor in gaining home field advantage from refs. We’re human.

I would like to see a follow-up study for soccer and assistant referees. This would be a fairly clean study as the operational procedures produces a great data set for assistant referees. 95% of the time, both sets of benches are on the same side of the field. For the non-soccer folks, there are two assistant referees. AR-1 stands on the bench side with the right shoulder to the goal. A team bench is usually a few yards behind him and coaches have a technical area where they are allowed to wander freely. AR-2 is on the far side with no one behind them. Teams switch the direction of attack at half time.

So AR-1 has Team A in his ear for forty five minutes where A is attacking. And AR-1 also gets Team A in his ear for forty five minutes while they are defending. Team B does not have easy and constant access to AR-1 as they are always at least ten yards away from the halfline and at the professional level (where the data would be) there is a fourth official to act as a buffer.

My prediction is that Team A would over the course of the season have fewer offside violations called during its attack than Team B. I think the mechanism that will occur is that most assistant referees know that they are evaluated when the flag goes up on close calls. If they are not 100% certain that an offside violation has occurred, they are told to keep the flag down and not call the violation. If they miss an egregious offside, they will be graded down. But if they are not calling the occasional offside where the attacking player is off by half a shoe, their evaluation will not be impacted. None of this is conscious bias, it is human nature where a referee can firmly believe that they are only 95% sure instead of 100% and thus they keep their flag down.

I would love to see this data as I think the logic would hold true with a very clean data set.

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « Thursday Morning Open Thread: Keep Going After the Bastids
Next Post: Make It Stop! (Open Thread) »

Reader Interactions

18Comments

  1. 1.

    JPL

    January 19, 2017 at 7:23 am

    Hello, Did yuo find a house?

  2. 2.

    Terp

    January 19, 2017 at 8:48 am

    That is really interesting. It’s nice to see some hard science that backs up what appears to happen a lot, but is hard to prove. The Washington Capitals at Pittsburgh Penguins on Monday night was an excellent example of this phenomenon.

  3. 3.

    DBaker

    January 19, 2017 at 9:06 am

    Hi Richard/David,

    Do you/will you have a comment on this?

    http://talkingpointsmemo.com/dc/tom-price-employer-heath-plans

    I was wondering whether the ultimate goal of such a plan has ever been gamed out – I assume it is to increase corporate profits/CEO pay even further by shifting the cost of employment unto the employee just like, for example, 401 (k) plans have done.

  4. 4.

    Bupalos

    January 19, 2017 at 9:16 am

    I think “yelling at the referees” has pretty much been the go-to coaching strategy on the right for 30 years or so (that’s fox news’ basic Raison d’etre.) And yeah, I’d say it works.

  5. 5.

    Anonymous at Work

    January 19, 2017 at 9:20 am

    It is also a function of coaches calling attention to it. Pit battles allow holding, hands to face, and chopping due to obstructed views. Coaches can call it out better. Not all bias from being yelled at.
    But yes, humans.

  6. 6.

    Pogonip

    January 19, 2017 at 9:48 am

    @DBaker: In another 20 years the plutocracy will be explaining why it’s perfectly reasonable for us to pay them to be allowed to work for them. They’ve already gotten away with internships and “certifications” of one kind or another.

  7. 7.

    NotMax

    January 19, 2017 at 10:20 am

    A favorite for many, many a moon.

    The Three Types of Umpires:

    1) “There are balls and there are strikes and I calls ’em as I sees ’em.”
    2) “There are balls and there are strikes and I calls ’em as they are.”
    3) “There are balls and there are strikes but they ain’t neither ’til I says so.”

  8. 8.

    SW

    January 19, 2017 at 10:21 am

    The NFL a multi-billion dollar business that relies on part time workers for the most critical job in the game. Absolute insanity.

  9. 9.

    etmckinley

    January 19, 2017 at 10:41 am

    Columbus Crew changed sides for the benches last season so that coaches could better yell at the AR. Last year was pretty dismal for the Crew performance wise, so I’m not sure if it helped. However, there may be a somewhat limited data set there to look at- and more if other clubs have done the same thing recently.

  10. 10.

    Chet

    January 19, 2017 at 11:37 am

    I always thought the main advantage of yelling at the refs was to get the makeup call a few plays later. But this makes sense too.

    But I also dropped in to get Richard’s take on the TPM story. I can’t believe I’m reading a Mayhew thread and saying, “Enough about sports. Let’s talk about insurance some more!!”

  11. 11.

    Yarrow

    January 19, 2017 at 11:53 am

    Seems like a political takeaway from this is that if you make a lot of noise, particularly at decision-makers like your representatives, you get more of what you want.

  12. 12.

    burnspbesq

    January 19, 2017 at 12:44 pm

    A visit to Cameron will show vividly how this works.

  13. 13.

    sukabi

    January 19, 2017 at 12:53 pm

    @Yarrow: unless your rep is repubs and you’re not…then they run away and fail to have any more “outreach” with constituents.

  14. 14.

    Dirty Davey

    January 19, 2017 at 1:22 pm

    @SW: The complaint about the NFL having “part-time” referees is kind of bogus. The reason the NFL has part-time referees is because the full regular-season schedule only has 17 games, each a week apart. I’ve never heard an explanation of what the referees would be doing for 30+ extra hours during the week between games (or for 40 hours during the other 35 weeks of the year) that would actually improve their officiating during the games.

  15. 15.

    mere mortal

    January 19, 2017 at 1:36 pm

    Great piece.

    But you don’t need a clean data set to discover what you are searching for. The effect is noisy, wildly dependent on loud / quiet coaches, accommodating / stubborn refs, and any number of other factors (trying to spare you the stat-speak).

    The signal will come through the noise, even with messy data, as long as there’s enough messy data.

    But again, this is fascinating.

  16. 16.

    NobodySpecial

    January 19, 2017 at 1:43 pm

    They should adjust for league storylines and Q-rated superstars, if you’re talking the NFL, as well. Teams with ’em get calls. Teams without ’em get the shaft.

  17. 17.

    Chet Murthy

    January 19, 2017 at 2:51 pm

    Richard,

    Completely OT, but … have you seen this article http://www.vox.com/first-person/2017/1/18/14300952/donald-trump-vote-regret
    ??

    Reading the section about the ACA, I get the distinct feeling I’m been lied-to. But I’m not in this business, so can’t quite tell. Do you have any opinions about this?

    When Obamacare first came into effect, I was excited to get what I
    thought would be financial help with my costly medicine and
    treatments. But when I signed up, my premium came back at an
    astronomical price, more than my monthly mortgage payment. This
    happened because I had to declare my husband’s salary as part of
    our household income, which put me in an earning bracket too high
    to qualify for any financial assistance. My husband works for a
    small business, and while he gets paid fairly, his company does
    not offer spousal insurance. I’m left with a premium of $893, so
    high that I can no longer afford the cost of my medicines and
    treatments on top of the monthly premiums. I wish I could opt out
    completely, but the penalty for not signing up is much too great.

  18. 18.

    Richard Mayhew

    January 19, 2017 at 11:32 pm

    @Chet Murthy: very plausible if they are in their 60s and making 401%+ FPL and on the individual market they are fucked

Comments are closed.

Primary Sidebar

Fundraising 2023-24

Wis*Dems Supreme Court + SD-8

Recent Comments

  • Torrey on War for Ukraine Day 396: The War Grinds On (Mar 26, 2023 @ 11:13pm)
  • Bill Arnold on War for Ukraine Day 396: The War Grinds On (Mar 26, 2023 @ 11:12pm)
  • Steeplejack on Medium Cool – Agatha Christie & Dorothy Sayers, Part III (Mar 26, 2023 @ 11:07pm)
  • Bill Arnold on War for Ukraine Day 396: The War Grinds On (Mar 26, 2023 @ 11:07pm)
  • RaflW on Sunday Evening Open Thread: The GOP, Now A Full-Scale Mafia (Mar 26, 2023 @ 11:05pm)

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
We All Need A Little Kindness
Classified Documents: A Primer
State & Local Elections Discussion

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Mailing List Signup
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)

Twitter / Spoutible

Balloon Juice (Spoutible)
WaterGirl (Spoutible)
TaMara (Spoutible)
John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
TaMara
David Anderson
Major Major Major Major
ActualCitizensUnited

Join the Fight!

Join the Fight Signup Form
All Join the Fight Posts

Balloon Juice Events

5/14  The Apocalypse
5/20  Home Away from Home
5/29  We’re Back, Baby
7/21  Merging!

Balloon Juice for Ukraine

Donate

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2023 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!