• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

The Supreme Court cannot be allowed to become the ultimate, unaccountable arbiter of everything.

When your entire life is steeped in white supremacy, equality feels like discrimination.

Incompetence, fear, or corruption? why not all three?

Everything is totally normal and fine!!!

Even though I know this is a bad idea, I’m off to do it anyway!

There are some who say that there are too many strawmen arguments on this blog.

Can we lighten up on the doomsday scenarios?

Technically true, but collectively nonsense

…and a burning sense of injustice to juice the soul.

Putting aside our relentless self-interest because the moral imperative is crystal clear.

T R E 4 5 O N

You don’t get to peddle hatred on saturday and offer condolences on sunday.

It’s always darkest before the other shoe drops.

A thin legal pretext to veneer over their personal religious and political desires.

We are builders in a constant struggle with destroyers. let’s win this.

The line between political reporting and fan fiction continues to blur.

I desperately hope that, yet again, I am wrong.

New McCarthy, same old McCarthyism.

Shallow, uninformed, and lacking identity

I’m pretty sure there’s only one Jack Smith.

Never forget that he train is barreling down on Trump, even as he dances on the tracks.

This must be what justice looks like, not vengeful, just peaceful exuberance.

Balloon Juice has never been a refuge for the linguistically delicate.

Stamping your little feets and demanding that they see how important you are? Not working anymore.

Mobile Menu

  • Four Directions Montana
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • COVID-19 Coronavirus
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • 2024 Elections
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • Targeted Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Past Elections / 2020 Elections / Two more perspectives on Cassidy-Collins

Two more perspectives on Cassidy-Collins

by David Anderson|  January 24, 20176:06 pm| 15 Comments

This post is in: 2020 Elections, Anderson On Health Insurance, Election 2018, Fuck Yeah!

FacebookTweetEmail

From last night’s very long live blog of my first read through of Cassidy-Collins, there are two comments I really want to highlight:

First from Archteryx:

Admittedly, my view on this is strictly selfish, but it does have some larger utility.

“Does this kill me?” is pretty much how I judge any Potemkin Village “replacement”. If the answer is “no” then at least they acknowledge that leaving the ACA largely intact is the only viable way going forward. If the answer is “yes”, then a whole lot of other Medicaid and individual-insurance folks are going to die with me, and it means they still only care about ‘repeal’ with ‘replace’ being nothing more then a fig leaf to hide the mass graves.

For those who don’t know his story, Archteryx has a chronic condition which requires regular nursing and surgical care.  He moved from a non-Medicaid expansion state to a Medicaid expansion state as soon as he could in order to guarantee his access to care.  Under the 2009 status quo, the national health policy for him is “Be quiet and die quickly in the corner”.  Cassidy-Collins won’t kill him.

Secondly, from Barbara on picking fights:

Here is a lesson I learned over the many years I have been working on health care regulation: things that are tweaks or forward looking can be changed and improved. Things that dismantle or gut the structure of a program will be, for all intents and purposes, permanent. They certainly won’t be revisited for at least 15 years. The two cardinal examples of this during my career were prescription drug and long term care coverage for Medicare beneficiaries (passed in 1988 and repealed in a mindless fury a year later, with drug coverage not re-examined until 2003 and long term care still not covered); and health care reform (killed in 1994, not revisited until 2009). Based on that simple analysis here is my reaction to what I have seen so far:

Hills to die on: Medicaid block grants
Hills to keep fighting on: high deductibles that mostly leave the rest of the ACA structure in place.

Let’s keep these two evaluation lenses in mind when we look at what comes out of this Congress and whether or not Democrats decide to engage on policy.

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « PSA Open Thread: Don’t Mourn, (Learn to) Organize
Next Post: The Takes- THEY ARE SO HOT »

Reader Interactions

15Comments

  1. 1.

    Baud

    January 24, 2017 at 6:14 pm

    Oh, wow. It’s the rare double, in-between STOMP.

  2. 2.

    guachi

    January 24, 2017 at 6:17 pm

    I’d be satisfied with a health care plan that leaves red states with 2/3 or 1/2 of the money that full ACA states get. Other details to be worked out later, but no way would I support red states getting large chunks of money to just to give huge tax cuts.

  3. 3.

    rikyrah

    January 24, 2017 at 6:17 pm

    Thanks for this.

  4. 4.

    Ben Vernia

    January 24, 2017 at 6:19 pm

    Thanks so much for the analysis – which is sadly missing in the rest of the media. Thanks, too, to thoughtful commenters like those you highlight.

  5. 5.

    Jay S

    January 24, 2017 at 6:25 pm

    I have a hard time believing that this legislation is going anywhere in the Senate let alone the House. I be happy to be wrong.

  6. 6.

    Sab

    January 24, 2017 at 6:50 pm

    Thanks for this.It gives me something not panicked sounding to say to my Republican senator who is or is pretending to be a moderate.

  7. 7.

    MomSense

    January 24, 2017 at 6:56 pm

    I’m so furious at Collins whose phone lines have been going straight to voicemail.

    She said that her bill will return power to the states. Has she no compassion for the people in her state who are already suffering because LePage refused to expand Medicaid? That assmouth will do everything he can to deny poor Mainers access to health care.

    She may just as well have said let them eat cake. I’m livid.

  8. 8.

    waysel

    January 24, 2017 at 7:01 pm

    Have pre-existing and 26 y/o children been gutted already, or is that just in the pipeline?

  9. 9.

    cmorenc

    January 24, 2017 at 7:29 pm

    @Jay S:

    I have a hard time believing that this legislation is going anywhere in the Senate let alone the House. I be happy to be wrong.

    The bigger meaning is that so long as there is a group of three or more GOP senators willing to bottleneck any further repeal movement unless there is a plausibly realistic replacement plan (and not merely a Potemkin Village fraudulent front of one) – “repeal” is blocked by impassible shoals, however much the boat commander blusteringly wishes to try to plow on through it. The downside is that Collins has a long history of talking like a moderate and then voting like a wingnut when it really matters. And so does Lindsey Graham and a couple of other GOP senators who have expressed serious doubts about repeal without a coherent, realistic replacement plan.

  10. 10.

    Jay S

    January 24, 2017 at 7:40 pm

    @cmorenc: Exactly why I don’t see this going anywhere. History doesn’t make these people much more than blusterers.
    I don’t trust this group to hold the line, let alone sell a competing plan.

  11. 11.

    Starfish

    January 24, 2017 at 8:42 pm

    Did you see this? Are these people really trying to make it so insurance does not have to cover maternity? What kind of twisted nonsense is this?

  12. 12.

    Jay S

    January 24, 2017 at 9:29 pm

    @Starfish: I didn’t see this, but my guess is that they want to implement pick and choose insurance as opposed to bundles, so single men and older women don’t have to pay for things that can’t happen to them. There were a lot of complaints about required coverage for “things that can’t or won’t happen to me” in the ACA arguments. Ala carte rather than prix fixe. In theory, people buy policies that cover maternity if they think they will need it. In practice it probably makes it unaffordable or unavailable with adverse selection.

  13. 13.

    nanute

    January 25, 2017 at 7:49 am

    David Anderson,
    Reading yesterday’s post, is it true that the bill removes the mandate that everyone has insurance? If so, it would seem the gap in coverage trigger to allow no coverage for preexisting conditions, is a neat little coercion mechanism. Hey, you don’t have to buy insurance, but if you don’t and exceed the gap, too bad, no preexisting condition coverage for you. Am I reading this wrong?

  14. 14.

    buskertype

    January 25, 2017 at 6:26 pm

    @Jay S: I’m not totally sure if this has a snowballs chance or not, but it will definitely be bad politics for them to cut 20 million people (including me) off their health insurance, and this is a credible but worse alternative that could give them cover for having spent years claiming they will repeal obamacare.

    the angry part of me hopes they reject it so I can spend the next 1.8 years before the election smacking them upside the head with it. the reasonable part of me hopes they adopt it because it would be a better-than-nothing outcome.

  15. 15.

    David Anderson

    January 25, 2017 at 11:01 pm

    @nanute: In Option 2 which is the state elective HSA alternative pathway which makes up 90% of the bill, the individual mandate is removed. However it is replaced with two pool maitenance mechanisms. The first one is the auto-enrollment with opt-out. This will capture the vast majority of the young Exchange eligible but not enrolled into low AV plans because very few people who are so disconnected from the current system will be motivated enough to be connected to the new system to turn down free hit by a bus coverage.

    And secondly, for the people who do opt out of auto-enrollment, there are significant underwriting daggers plus late enrollment penalties.

    Option 1 states (ACA as is) would still have the individual mandate.

Comments are closed.

Primary Sidebar

Recent Comments

  • Dan B on Wednesday Evening Open Thread: Baltimore Bridge Updates (Apr 17, 2024 @ 10:22pm)
  • Lyrebird on War for Ukraine Day 785: Chernihiv Attacked! (Apr 17, 2024 @ 10:22pm)
  • Mr. Bemused Senior on Wednesday Evening Open Thread: Baltimore Bridge Updates (Apr 17, 2024 @ 10:21pm)
  • WaterGirl on Humpty Trumpty (Open Thread) (Apr 17, 2024 @ 10:21pm)
  • Mousebumples on Wednesday Evening Open Thread: Baltimore Bridge Updates (Apr 17, 2024 @ 10:20pm)

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Balloon Juice Meetups!

All Meetups
Talk of Meetups – Meetup Planning
Proposed BJ meetups list from frosty

Fundraising 2023-24

Wis*Dems Supreme Court + SD-8
Virginia House Races
Four Directions – Montana
Worker Power AZ
Four Directions – Arizona
Four Directions – Nevada

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
Positive Climate News
War in Ukraine
Cole’s “Stories from the Road”
Classified Documents Primer

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Mailing List Signup
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)

Fix Nyms with Apostrophes

Balloon Juice for Ukraine

Donate

Twitter / Spoutible

Balloon Juice (Spoutible)
WaterGirl (Spoutible)
TaMara (Spoutible)
John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
David Anderson
Major Major Major Major
ActualCitizensUnited

Political Action 2024

Postcard Writing Information

Balloon Juice for Four Directions AZ

Donate

Balloon Juice for Four Directions NV

Donate

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2024 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!