• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

This really is a full service blog.

Never entrust democracy to any process that requires republicans to act in good faith.

So it was an October Surprise A Day, like an Advent calendar but for crime.

Never entrust democracy to any process that requires Republicans to act in good faith.

Usually wrong but never in doubt

It may be funny to you motherfucker, but it’s not funny to me.

Giving up is unforgivable.

This must be what justice looks like, not vengeful, just peaceful exuberance.

There is no right way to do the wrong thing.

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

Dear media: perhaps we ought to let Donald Trump speak for himself!

Trump’s cabinet: like a magic 8 ball that only gives wrong answers.

Giving in to doom is how we fail to fight for ourselves & one another.

I’d hate to be the candidate who lost to this guy.

Come on, man.

I’m starting to think Jesus may have made a mistake saving people with no questions asked.

The press swings at every pitch, we don’t have to.

Washington Post Catch and Kill, not noticeably better than the Enquirer’s.

The gop is a fucking disgrace.

Weird. Rome has an American Pope and America has a Russian President.

We need to vote them all out and restore sane Democratic government.

Republicans do not pay their debts.

In my day, never was longer.

Wake up. Grow up. Get in the fight.

Mobile Menu

  • Seattle Meet-up Post
  • 2025 Activism
  • Targeted Political Fundraising
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • COVID-19
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • 2025 Activism
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • Targeted Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Anderson On Health Insurance / Individualized risk adjustment and IBNR

Individualized risk adjustment and IBNR

by David Anderson|  January 26, 20176:23 am| 2 Comments

This post is in: Anderson On Health Insurance, C.R.E.A.M.

FacebookTweetEmail

This is a follow-up from yesterday’s post on the pragmatic barriers to effective and equitable individualized risk adjusted subsidies in a risk-rated individual market. There is another major problem, claims and diagnoses don’t come in instantly. Individual providers/hospitals/physician groups do not have a universal timeline to file claims. My kids’ pediatrician files claims within two days and gets paid within ten days of the service.  My PCP files claims on the 1st and 15th of the month.  My wife has one provider who files weekly.  The other provider has a claim from several months ago that has yet to hit payables.

In 2013,as CMS was setting up the ACO model, this is what a consultant stated typical Medicare claims completion would look like:

The longer the run out period, the more accurate the data will be, which is why CMS waits until later in the year following the measurement period in which to determine shared savings.  A shorter run out period could possibly indicate higher savings than were achieved in actuality.

According to CMS’s proposed ACO rule, based on an analysis of historical claims trends, a 3-month run-out typically results in an approximate completion rate of 98.5% for Part B services and 98% for Part A services.  In comparison, a 6-month run-out would result in an approximate completion rate of 99.5% for Part B services and 99% for Part A services.

Zero-months run out data is useless as less than half the claims are normally in.  1 month of run-out points an insurer in the right direction and three months of run out is pretty damn good.  Data stabilizes at almost full completion by twelve months.  There are odd cases where claims that are for services performed a year or more in the past will not be finalized but most of the time, those are isolated and odd events.

Insurers can handle run-out data gaps because they have millions of claims to work with, they have long periods of coherent data and they have actuaries and statistical analysts who spend all day, every day building and running models that produce reasonably accurate approximations that can be updated as new payable cycles eat claims from the previous months.  A good analytics team should be able to look at their claim universe and project with a reasonable degree of accuracy the projected incremental risk adjustment value that an incomplete month will ultimately produce.  That projection will get better as more run-out occurs, but the combination of expertise, consistent patterns and huge data sets allows for a useful prediction.

Individuals don’t have that luxury of projecting their incurred but not reported (IBNR) claims for their subsidy. If they received a new qualifying diagnosis that triggers an incremental subsidy increase in November and the claim is not processed until January, they are out of luck if they have to make a policy decision during Open Enrollment that ends in the middle of December.  Their actual subsidy will be significantly less than their entitled subsidy while insurers can use the provider notes or medical history to underwrite against them.

A possible solution would be to have a condition where insurers could not underwrite against the last six months of medical history while individuals waited for their claims to complete and an updated and accurate risk score is calculated.  This means that for a January 1 start date, the risk score would be valid as of July 1 and underwriting could only be done against medical history as of July 1.  This starts getting really messy and there will still be edge cases whose claims are not being completed with six months of run-out.  There will still be strong incentives for insurers to find ways to tilt their product and marketing profiles to avoid high cost conditions that were incurred after the data freeze date.

 

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « Thursday Morning Open Thread: Never Stop Fighting Back
Next Post: Big Payer vs. Big Provider in the Bay State »

Reader Interactions

2Comments

  1. 1.

    pluky

    January 26, 2017 at 9:09 am

    yet another reason why individual health insurance is a stupid idea.

  2. 2.

    Jacel

    January 26, 2017 at 11:05 am

    Have you looked at the current situation in California where a large provider (Palo Alto Medical Foundation) and large customer bases (including Pacific Gas & Electric employees/retirees) are at loggerheads, with a contract not finalized going into the new year? That sounds similar to the Massachusetts case you described.

Comments are closed.

Primary Sidebar

On The Road - PaulB - Olympic Peninsula: Lake Quinault Loop Drive 5
Image by PaulB (5/19/25)

Recent Comments

  • Jackie on Monday Evening Open Thread: Perspective (May 19, 2025 @ 8:16pm)
  • mrmoshpotato on Monday Evening Open Thread: Perspective (May 19, 2025 @ 8:13pm)
  • Jay on Monday Evening Open Thread: Perspective (May 19, 2025 @ 8:13pm)
  • MagdaInBlack on Monday Evening Open Thread: Perspective (May 19, 2025 @ 8:13pm)
  • mrmoshpotato on Monday Evening Open Thread: Perspective (May 19, 2025 @ 8:12pm)

PA Supreme Court At Risk

Donate

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
War in Ukraine
Donate to Razom for Ukraine

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

Meetups

Upcoming Ohio Meetup May 17
5/11 Post about the May 17 Ohio Meetup

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)
Fix Nyms with Apostrophes

Hands Off! – Denver, San Diego & Austin

Social Media

Balloon Juice
WaterGirl
TaMara
John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
David Anderson
Major Major Major Major
DougJ NYT Pitchbot
mistermix

Keeping Track

Legal Challenges (Lawfare)
Republicans Fleeing Town Halls (TPM)
21 Letters (to Borrow or Steal)
Search Donations from a Brand

PA Supreme Court At Risk

Donate

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2025 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!