• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

Reality always lies in wait for … Democrats.

I was promised a recession.

Authoritarian republicans are opposed to freedom for the rest of us.

If you tweet it in all caps, that makes it true!

Nothing worth doing is easy.

You don’t get to peddle hatred on saturday and offer condolences on sunday.

Insiders who complain to politico: please report to the white house office of shut the fuck up.

Conservatism: there are some people the law protects but does not bind and others who the law binds but does not protect.

… riddled with inexplicable and elementary errors of law and fact

I’m pretty sure there’s only one Jack Smith.

When do the post office & the dmv weigh in on the wuhan virus?

We cannot abandon the truth and remain a free nation.

This has so much WTF written all over it that it is hard to comprehend.

… pundit janitors mopping up after the GOP

Our job is not to persuade republicans but to defeat them.

Good lord, these people are nuts.

Is it irresponsible to speculate? It is irresponsible not to.

It’s time for the GOP to dust off that post-2012 autopsy, completely ignore it, and light the party on fire again.

Speaking of republicans, is there a way for a political party to declare intellectual bankruptcy?

This fight is for everything.

I’d like to think you all would remain faithful to me if i ever tried to have some of you killed.

Let us savor the impending downfall of lawless scoundrels who richly deserve the trouble barreling their way.

Come on, media. you have one job. start doing it.

“Everybody’s entitled to be an idiot.”

Mobile Menu

  • Winnable House Races
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • Balloon Juice 2023 Pet Calendar (coming soon)
  • COVID-19 Coronavirus
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • War in Ukraine
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • 2021-22 Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Politics / America / Your New Supreme Court Nominee is Neil Gorsuch

Your New Supreme Court Nominee is Neil Gorsuch

by Adam L Silverman|  January 31, 20178:07 pm| 136 Comments

This post is in: America, Domestic Politics, Election 2016, Open Threads, Politics

FacebookTweetEmail

The President has just nominated Judge Neil Gorsuch to fill the vacancy that the GOP majority in the US Senate held open for almost a year after the death of Associate Justice Scalia.

From Mother Jones:

Many court watchers, noting Trump’s “central casting” approach to staffing, consider the 10th Circuit judge the favorite for the high court seat, if for no other reason than “he looks the part,” as Empirical SCOTUS blogger Adam Feldman put it. David Lat, founder of legal affairs blog Above the Law, tweeted recently that Gorsuch seems like the obvious choice for Trump because “we all know Trump cares about looks, & Neil ‘Silver Fox’ Gorsuch is taller & handsomer than (the already good-looking) Bill Pryor.” Lat also noted, “Judge Gorsuch is a ‘winner’—brilliant, pedigreed, tall, handsome—and Trump likes winners.” Unlike Pryor and Hardiman, Gorsuch is also an Ivy Leaguer.

An Oxford and Harvard grad, Gorsuch, 49, is also one of the youngest sitting federal judges on Trump’s list—a selling point for a president looking to leave a lasting legacy on the court. He is a conservative in the mold of the late Justice Antonin Scalia and is considered an “originalist” who tries to interpret the law as the Founders would have. Also in his column: As one of the 10th Circuit judges who ruled in favor of Hobby Lobby against the Obama administration—exempting the company from federal requirements to provide employees with insurance plans that included free contraceptive coverage—his religious-right bona fides are solid.

But hard-core anti-abortion activists have been lobbying against Gorsuch and recently asked Trump to consider judges with a more proven record of anti-abortion advocacy from the bench. Andrew Schlafly, son of the late conservative icon Phyllis Schlafly, recently sent out an alert to supporters arguing that Gorsuch is “NOT pro-life” because he wrote an opinion noting his obligation to follow court precedent. Schlafly sees adherence to precedent as a deal-breaker and a sign that a judge won’t overturn Roe.

Pryor, Hardiman, and Gorsuch are the leading candidates for the Supreme Court job, but Trump is unpredictable. So maybe he’ll go with bomb-thrower Texas Supreme Court Justice Don Willett, who calls himself Texas’ most conservative justice. Willett sees very little role for the government in regulating health and safety issues. He once joined with the state court to strike down as unconstitutional training requirements for people who perform eyebrow threading, a hair removal procedure that can spread various diseases, including ringworm and pink eye.

A Reason columnist declared Willett’s concurrence in the case “easily one of the most libertarian legal decisions I’ve ever read.” Willett wrote with outrage about the greater threat to liberty of regulating eyebrow plucking:

This case raises constitutional eyebrows because it asks building-block questions about constitutional architecture—about how we as Texans govern ourselves and about the relationship of the citizen to the State. This case concerns far more than whether Ashish Patel can pluck unwanted hair with a strand of thread. This case is fundamentally about the American Dream and the unalienable human right to pursue happiness without curtsying to government on bended knee.

As far as appearances go, Willett doesn’t necessarily have the central-casting looks that seem so important to Trump. But he does have one quality Trump clearly appreciates: With more than 75,000 followers, Willett is really good on Twitter.

 Discuss among yourselves!
FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « The Lion’s Roar on the Turning of the Wheel – From the Middle Length Discourses of the Buddha
Next Post: On SCOTUS: I Like How Jason Kander Thinks »

Reader Interactions

136Comments

  1. 1.

    Corner Stone

    January 31, 2017 at 8:09 pm

    As I just said below, well at least his wife is hot.

  2. 2.

    Trentrunner

    January 31, 2017 at 8:09 pm

    For me, this is the most enraging and consequential (predictable) event in Hillary’s defeat.

    There are not words profane enough to describe McConnell & the GOP.

    Would LOVE for the Dems to derail this, but they won’t.

  3. 3.

    Corner Stone

    January 31, 2017 at 8:09 pm

    CAN NO ONE ASSOCIATED WITH THIS FUCKING ADMINISTRATION GET A FUCKING TAILOR OR SOMEONE WHO CAN PROPERLY DRESS THEM?

  4. 4.

    dmsilev

    January 31, 2017 at 8:10 pm

    He is a conservative in the mold of the late Justice Antonin Scalia and is considered an “originalist” who tries to interpret the law as the Founders would have.

    It always amazes me that anyone can write that with a straight face.

  5. 5.

    Jim, Foolish Literalist

    January 31, 2017 at 8:10 pm

    Andrew Schlafly, son of the late conservative icon Phyllis Schlafly, recently sent out an alert to supporters arguing that Gorsuch is “NOT pro-life” because he wrote an opinion noting his obligation to follow court precedent.

    wasn’t that one of the challenges to Alito, that he wouldn’t come out and say that he respects precedent?

    (IANAL, but I believe it’s referred to as stare decisis)

  6. 6.

    Lavocat

    January 31, 2017 at 8:11 pm

    One word, motherfuckers: FILIBUSTER!

  7. 7.

    Baud

    January 31, 2017 at 8:11 pm

    @Corner Stone: probably why he got the job.

    @Trentrunner: agreed.

  8. 8.

    lamh36

    January 31, 2017 at 8:11 pm

    Fuq this pick…I fully expect the Dems to roll over and show their damn bellies on this one …

    @JoyAnnReid
    This is the moment Trump pays back the Christian right, which ignored every one of its own principles to support him in exchange for SCOTUS.

  9. 9.

    Elizabelle

    January 31, 2017 at 8:11 pm

    Nobody but Merrick Garland.

    Just say no. Losers.

  10. 10.

    Corner Stone

    January 31, 2017 at 8:11 pm

    @Trentrunner: I am fucking furious. More than just about anything else. We were so fucking close to cementing our progress for a generation.
    FUCK!

  11. 11.

    MomSense

    January 31, 2017 at 8:12 pm

    Did he just get choked up over Scalia? Oh FFS.

  12. 12.

    Baud

    January 31, 2017 at 8:12 pm

    @Elizabelle: IIRC, Garland wasn’t exciting enough for us.

  13. 13.

    Elizabelle

    January 31, 2017 at 8:12 pm

    Antonin Scalia IS still dead. That’s always reassuring.

    But that was Obama’s Supreme Court seat to fill. Do not cooperate in seating a Trump nominee.

  14. 14.

    hilts

    January 31, 2017 at 8:12 pm

    For blocking any consideration of Merrick Garland, scumbag Mitch McConnell deserves to burn in Hell.

  15. 15.

    lamh36

    January 31, 2017 at 8:12 pm

    @mikememoli
    Sen. Blumenthal (D) reax:”I have deep, serious concerns about Judge Gorsuch.” Reserves right to “pursue every legal tool available” to block

  16. 16.

    Adam L Silverman

    January 31, 2017 at 8:13 pm

    @Jim, Foolish Literalist: Yes and yes. Schlafly’s problem is that Gorsuch ruled in favor of a transgender woman who had sued over workplace discrimination she experienced when first transitioning.

  17. 17.

    Baud

    January 31, 2017 at 8:13 pm

    @Corner Stone: We only thought we were. White people were never going to make it happen.

  18. 18.

    Corner Stone

    January 31, 2017 at 8:13 pm

    @MomSense: He cried on the side of a mountain when he got the news of Scalia’s oh so untimely passing.

  19. 19.

    Another Scott

    January 31, 2017 at 8:14 pm

    It doesn’t really matter who he nominates, does it? I mean, except for Garland, of course. It’s a no-brainer that all the Democrats are going to oppose this and filibuster it (if necessary), right?

    (sigh)

    Cheers,
    Scott.
    (Perhaps the next Democratic President and Congress will increase the justices on the SCOTUS to 15. That’s a good number, I think…)

  20. 20.

    Timurid

    January 31, 2017 at 8:14 pm

    What’s wrong with Gorsuch? There’s clearly something very wrong with him, or else Bann^H^H^H^H^Trump would have never picked him. I’m not enough of a SCOTUS nerd to be immediately familiar with him. The profiles I’ve read present him as a pretty ordinary Republican. He’s an originalist, but you can find a crowd of those on every street corner these days… What am I missing?

  21. 21.

    Elizabelle

    January 31, 2017 at 8:14 pm

    @Baud: My little heart beat for Merrick Garland.

    Although it’s good to know he’s Chief Judge of the DC Court of Appeals. That’s a hugely powerful seat. I wish him decades more of good health and public service.

  22. 22.

    Villago Delenda Est

    January 31, 2017 at 8:14 pm

    Reject him. Bork him.

  23. 23.

    Major Major Major Major

    January 31, 2017 at 8:14 pm

    @hilts: don’t worry, he will.

  24. 24.

    Baud

    January 31, 2017 at 8:15 pm

    @Another Scott: thats on my agenda. Exactly.

    That and make PR and DC states.

  25. 25.

    Corner Stone

    January 31, 2017 at 8:15 pm

    @Baud: White people are the fucking worst.

  26. 26.

    SiubhanDuinne

    January 31, 2017 at 8:15 pm

    Totally apart from the qualifications or lack thereof of Gorsuch — who the fuck announced his SCOTUS nomination with lines like “Were you surprised? How many were surprised at my pick?” and “He was confirmed unanimously, UNANIMOUSLY, can you even believe it?”

    I am just curdled with shame every time I hear this man’s voice or see his image or read about him. We’re only 11 days in.

  27. 27.

    Hildebrand

    January 31, 2017 at 8:15 pm

    I wonder if Gorsuch, in his most private moments, will admit he is sitting in Merrick Garland’s seat, that he is an interloper.

    Nah. Probably is as introspective as Trump himself.

  28. 28.

    MomSense

    January 31, 2017 at 8:15 pm

    @Corner Stone:

    Oh brother. That’s disqualifying.

  29. 29.

    oldster

    January 31, 2017 at 8:15 pm

    Democrats should make it clear from the outset that they will vote for Merrick Garland, and against anyone else.

    They should obstruct, delay, filibuster, and pull every trick in the book to make sure that Trump never puts anyone on the SCOTUS.

  30. 30.

    Quinerly

    January 31, 2017 at 8:15 pm

    I am furious all over again. Basically a perpetual state since November but actually had calmed down a bit today. He should be embarrassed to be nominated by a fucking President Trump.

  31. 31.

    khead

    January 31, 2017 at 8:16 pm

    @Timurid:

    Youth. Scalia. Hobby Lobby.

  32. 32.

    Mike in NC

    January 31, 2017 at 8:16 pm

    When the reality TV game show host appeared on screen, we immediately went to cable.

  33. 33.

    Baud

    January 31, 2017 at 8:16 pm

    @Timurid: The right doesn’t play games with judicial picks.

  34. 34.

    Cacti

    January 31, 2017 at 8:16 pm

    Anyone who considers Antonin Scalia a judicial role model should be opposed.

  35. 35.

    MomSense

    January 31, 2017 at 8:17 pm

    I’m so sick of religious freedom being defined by fucking fringe fundamentalist freaks who want to impose their beliefs on everyone else.

  36. 36.

    NotMax

    January 31, 2017 at 8:19 pm

    Ya never know. Souter fit into the right-wing boxes when nominated.

  37. 37.

    lamh36

    January 31, 2017 at 8:19 pm

    @Lib_Librarian
    Cheeto just selected a Christian fanatic & homophobe for #SCOTUS. But do tell me how Hillary would have been worse.

    @amprog 3m3 minutes ago
    More
    Here’s what you need to know: #NotOurJustice

  38. 38.

    Baud

    January 31, 2017 at 8:19 pm

    @NotMax: That would be a miracle.

  39. 39.

    Elizabelle

    January 31, 2017 at 8:19 pm

    Craving a burger. Back later.

    One wonders what fresh horror will be served up by then. It’s like last night’s firing of Sally Yates.

    Which decade that we should have learned from did we just hit now? It’s shellshock, every single day.

    By design.

  40. 40.

    Another Scott

    January 31, 2017 at 8:20 pm

    @NotMax: And Lincoln was a Republican. ;-p

    I think we know enough. I think you do, too.

    Cheers,
    Scot.

  41. 41.

    Baud

    January 31, 2017 at 8:21 pm

    @lamh36:

    To be fair, any GOP president would have picked someone similar. But, yeah, Hillary would have been infinitely better.

  42. 42.

    Corner Stone

    January 31, 2017 at 8:21 pm

    Any Democratic Senator that votes for this pick should have a feeling of looming doom every single day.

  43. 43.

    SiubhanDuinne

    January 31, 2017 at 8:21 pm

    @lamh36:

    But do tell me how Hillary would have been worse.

    Emails, DUH.

  44. 44.

    TenguPhule

    January 31, 2017 at 8:22 pm

    Garland him.

    No consideration. No vote.

    And someone take a baseball bat to Manchin’s knees if he tries to break ranks.

  45. 45.

    Timurid

    January 31, 2017 at 8:22 pm

    @khead:
    I guess that just shows how far my expectations have been lowered. I was expecting a flesh-eating monster like Willett, and this feels almost like a relief. But I guess that’s the Gaslighter in Chief master plan at work. At some point you’ll start wanting to thank him when he blackens only one of your eyes…

  46. 46.

    Dog Dawg Damn

    January 31, 2017 at 8:22 pm

    Meh. Obama should have recess appointed Garland. Dems should have thrown a shit fit over it, and forced it to happen. We didn’t. Too busy with EMAILS!!%#@ to care.

    Gonna save my breath on this one. Lost cause, and he’d just be replaced with someone similar.

  47. 47.

    SiubhanDuinne

    January 31, 2017 at 8:23 pm

    @MomSense:

    fucking fringe fundamentalist freaks

    Apt alliteration’s artful aid. Very nice.

  48. 48.

    TenguPhule

    January 31, 2017 at 8:23 pm

    @Cacti: Or executed as a clear and present danger to the Republic.

  49. 49.

    Baud

    January 31, 2017 at 8:23 pm

    @Timurid: It’s good to have a sober analysis. But never be grateful.

  50. 50.

    Comrade Scrutinizer

    January 31, 2017 at 8:24 pm

    However, these words:

    the late conservative icon Phyllis Schlafly

    We can always find little rays of sunshine.

  51. 51.

    BBA

    January 31, 2017 at 8:24 pm

    See, when I think of a judge out of “central casting”, I think of one who looks like Jack Weinstein – bald, with bushy eyebrows.

    Of course Weinstein is 96 years old, a Democrat, and something of a crank, so he wouldn’t be on anyone’s short list.

  52. 52.

    Major Major Major Major

    January 31, 2017 at 8:24 pm

    @Cacti:

    Anyone who considers Antonin Scalia a judicial role model should be opposed.

    Anybody who considers Scalia a judicial role model should be beaten up.

  53. 53.

    Corner Stone

    January 31, 2017 at 8:24 pm

    Lindsey Graham can go fuck himself.

  54. 54.

    Joyce H

    January 31, 2017 at 8:24 pm

    @SiubhanDuinne:

    I am just curdled with shame every time I hear this man’s voice or see his image or read about him. We’re only 11 days in.

    Oh, me too! And when the background image is the Oval Office or the East Room or other White House settings, that just compounds it beyond my power to express.

  55. 55.

    ms_canadada

    January 31, 2017 at 8:25 pm

    @SiubhanDuinne: I’m watching Season 2 of The Americans. Seems appropriate. BTW, as I’ve mentioned before, I have a spare room here in Hamilton, ON, Canada!

  56. 56.

    Comrade Scrutinizer

    January 31, 2017 at 8:25 pm

    @SiubhanDuinne: Don’t forget Benghazi!1!!

  57. 57.

    Seth Owen

    January 31, 2017 at 8:26 pm

    On general principle Democrats should filibuster to prevent filling the stolen seat.

    Undoubtedly the Republicans will invoke the nuclear option, which we knew they would whenver it really counted, and this really counts.

    Over the long run, however, ditching the filibuster helps progressives more than keeping it. Republicans aren’t going to let legal niceties hinder them, but it will be easier for progressives to enact real reforms if they don’t have to chase 60 votes all the time. Historically the filibuster has been used far more often by the reactionary elements.

  58. 58.

    schrodingers_cat

    January 31, 2017 at 8:26 pm

    They want to deport legal immigrants on financial assistance. That means children and old people. This man and his enablers are evil.

  59. 59.

    Jim, Foolish Literalist

    January 31, 2017 at 8:26 pm

    remember this guy?

    David GregoryVerified account
    ‏@ davidgregory
    Strong leadership moment for President. Promise made/promise kept. Qualified nominee that will provoke an ideological battle that unites GOP

  60. 60.

    ? Martin

    January 31, 2017 at 8:26 pm

    @Corner Stone: Yeah. “This man won and he deserves the right to choose a Supreme Court nominee.” Huh. I recall when Obama won and deserved the right to choose a nominee…

  61. 61.

    Le Comte de Monte Cristo, fka Edmund Dantes

    January 31, 2017 at 8:26 pm

    @dmsilev:

    Necromancy…

  62. 62.

    Comrade Scrutinizer

    January 31, 2017 at 8:27 pm

    @Joyce H:

    And when the background image is the Oval Office or the East Room or other White House settings, that just compounds it beyond my power to express.

    Argh. Those fucking tacky gold drapes. Gouge my fucking eyes out.

  63. 63.

    Corner Stone

    January 31, 2017 at 8:27 pm

    Garland was confirmed to the DC Circuit at like 76 – 23 ! How in the fuck can you say he should not have been allowed a vote!

  64. 64.

    SiubhanDuinne

    January 31, 2017 at 8:27 pm

    @Corner Stone:

    CAN NO ONE ASSOCIATED WITH THIS FUCKING ADMINISTRATION GET A FUCKING TAILOR OR SOMEONE WHO CAN PROPERLY DRESS THEM?

    Ties too long.

    Single-breasted one-buttoned-over-paunch suit jackets.

    Ill-fitting collars.

    And most of the men look like they are on barely first-name terms with shampoo, let alone competent barbers.

  65. 65.

    amk

    January 31, 2017 at 8:27 pm

    Wasn’t this one of them ‘battles’ the dems were gonna ‘pick’? Any word from them yet?

  66. 66.

    Corner Stone

    January 31, 2017 at 8:28 pm

    @Jim, Foolish Literalist: Monkey Boy needs to go back into the darkness and continue fucking himself.

  67. 67.

    Tenar Arha (same Tenar, more Nameless Ones)

    January 31, 2017 at 8:29 pm

    @Dog Dawg Damn: IIRC recess appointments were actually curtailed by the Supreme Court, & before that by Republicans breaking all norms & precedents by playing with the rules of when Congress was actually in session.

  68. 68.

    lamh36

    January 31, 2017 at 8:30 pm

    Luvvie Ajayi

    The SCOTUS pick is 49. This man is gonna serve like 40 years. This is why we could not afford a Trump presidency. This shit here. This is why I asked folks to volunteer their votes as tribute.
    That is someone who will rule for a generation. Geez.

  69. 69.

    MomSense

    January 31, 2017 at 8:30 pm

    This guy is only 49? No way.

  70. 70.

    SiubhanDuinne

    January 31, 2017 at 8:30 pm

    @Corner Stone:

    He cried on the side of a mountain when he got the news of Scalia’s oh so untimely passing.

    But wait, Schumer cried “fake tears” over his many relatives who perished in the concentration camps. So, equivalence.

  71. 71.

    Kelly

    January 31, 2017 at 8:30 pm

    @Corner Stone: This

  72. 72.

    mai naem mobile

    January 31, 2017 at 8:30 pm

    @SiubhanDuinne: I turned to NPR and could not handle pigfuckers voice and switched stations. Just so you know Neil Gorsuch is the son of Ann Gorsuch Burford the EPA beeyotch under Reagan. Also,he has the same shit eating smirk that all of pigfuckers nominees have. Fuck Mitch McConnell.

  73. 73.

    Paul in KY

    January 31, 2017 at 8:31 pm

    @Corner Stone: He probably does. With 2 wetsuits. Also. Too.

  74. 74.

    NotMax

    January 31, 2017 at 8:31 pm

    @Another Scott

    Am not one prone to snap judgments, prefer to take the time to do some research first.

    Justice is blind, and Sessions is someone who yearns to make justice deaf as well. Am not prepared at this moment to definitively say the same of this guy. Doesn’t mean I won’t come to that conclusion a bit later.

  75. 75.

    Corner Stone

    January 31, 2017 at 8:31 pm

    @SiubhanDuinne: Badly fitting over sized suit jacket that caused it to wrap and billow around the waist and the collar to pouch out away from his neckline. And that fucking necktie! What country yokel did he knock over the head and steal that from?

  76. 76.

    amk

    January 31, 2017 at 8:31 pm

    @Tenar Arha (same Tenar, more Nameless Ones):

    before that by Republicans breaking all norms & precedents by playing with the rules of when Congress was actually in session.

    yup. dems can learn a few lessons from the thugs how to gum up the works.

  77. 77.

    MomSense

    January 31, 2017 at 8:32 pm

    “Pro life” and pro NRA? GTFO

  78. 78.

    SiubhanDuinne

    January 31, 2017 at 8:32 pm

    @Jim, Foolish Literalist:

    Oh, just FUCK David Gregory. Let him dance with a rusty combine and go home with it and have it FUCK him.

  79. 79.

    Kelly

    January 31, 2017 at 8:33 pm

    @MomSense: This

  80. 80.

    Major Major Major Major

    January 31, 2017 at 8:33 pm

    @amk: at least give them a minute before deciding they sold you out, dude.

  81. 81.

    Lizzy L

    January 31, 2017 at 8:34 pm

    From The Hill:

    Sen. Joe Manchin (W.Va.) says he isn’t planning to join calls from fellow Democrats to filibuster President Trump’s forthcoming Supreme Court nominee.

    “I’m not going to filibuster anybody,” Manchin told the conservative Weekly Standard on Tuesday.

  82. 82.

    Iowa Old Lady

    January 31, 2017 at 8:34 pm

    This guy needs to be filibustered for, oh, almost a year. Then we can talk.

  83. 83.

    Jim, Foolish Literalist

    January 31, 2017 at 8:34 pm

    Andrea MitchellVerified account
    ‏@ mitchellreports
    [email protected] ChuckTodd: he made an incredible 1st impression predicts it will be harder for democrats to unify behind filibuster once they meet him

    “meet him”. because policy doesn’t count. Is he, like Kellyanne Conway, a “good person”.

  84. 84.

    TenguPhule

    January 31, 2017 at 8:35 pm

    Take a page from the new Trump rule on regulations.

    Trump only gets one SC pick if Alito and Thomas exit the SC, on their feet or on a stretcher.

  85. 85.

    Corner Stone

    January 31, 2017 at 8:35 pm

    @Lizzy L:

    “I’m not going to filibuster anybody,” Manchin told the conservative Weekly Standard on Tuesday.

    *checks GPS*

  86. 86.

    Villago Delenda Est

    January 31, 2017 at 8:35 pm

    @Jim, Foolish Literalist: Dancin’ Dave. Vile suckup. Needs tumbrel ride, stat.

  87. 87.

    Kelly

    January 31, 2017 at 8:35 pm

    Sen Jeff Merkley promises a filibuster.

  88. 88.

    TenguPhule

    January 31, 2017 at 8:35 pm

    @Lizzy L: Baseball bat. Kneecaps.

  89. 89.

    Villago Delenda Est

    January 31, 2017 at 8:36 pm

    @Iowa Old Lady: Try four years.

  90. 90.

    mai naem mobile

    January 31, 2017 at 8:37 pm

    @Lizzy L: you don’t need Manchin to filibuster.

  91. 91.

    Villago Delenda Est

    January 31, 2017 at 8:38 pm

    @SiubhanDuinne: There’s nothing with them that can’t be solved by any of them being a head shorter.

  92. 92.

    Tenar Arha (same Tenar, more Nameless Ones)

    January 31, 2017 at 8:38 pm

    @SiubhanDuinne: I don’t understand why I find it so offensive that these guys (& some women) with all their $ fail so hard at fashion. They’re schlubs, and they have the money & contacts not to be.

  93. 93.

    lamh36

    January 31, 2017 at 8:38 pm

    this fuqn’ guy!!!

    @TheFix
    Trump’s ability to orchestrate these events to draw eyeballs is truly astounding

  94. 94.

    Brachiator

    January 31, 2017 at 8:39 pm

    Obama appoints a judge with Ivy League credentials and the snarling right wing dogs bowl about Obama’s arrogant elitism.

    Trump appoints a judge with Ivy League credentials and the snarling dogs bark about a wise and classy choice.

    I try to be even handed about the various liberals who could not support Hillary, but you muthafvcking idiots knew that the Supreme Court was in play. You knew it. Someone should slap you upside the head.

  95. 95.

    Turgidson

    January 31, 2017 at 8:39 pm

    @dmsilev:

    Seriously. I mean, I suppose it’s possible for a judge to try to rule based on the original intent of the founding documents. But Scalia, for all his pomposity about it, jettisoned that “philosophy” whenever it served his short-term interests. And by the end, he was basically a demented right-wing blogger with a better vocabulary

  96. 96.

    Jim, Foolish Literalist

    January 31, 2017 at 8:39 pm

    Heitkamp and Minchin have announced they won’t filibuster. Coons is making mealy-mouthed noise about allowing a vote, not clear if he means the filibuster. That still leaves Dems, assuming King holds on, a five vote filibuster margin, no?

  97. 97.

    Timurid

    January 31, 2017 at 8:41 pm

    @Brachiator: At the end of the day, it doesn’t matter if Gorsuch is Aristotle reincarnated. He will still be sitting in a stolen seat.

  98. 98.

    Another Scott

    January 31, 2017 at 8:41 pm

    @NotMax: It really doesn’t matter who the pick is.

    This seat was Obama’s to fill. That’s the bottom line.

    If they won’t nominate and seat Garland, then they don’t get to pick.

    Let the SCOTUS have 8 seats for a while. The Republic will survive.

    It won’t survive under a system where only the GOP gets to decide who replaces a sitting GOP Justice, and by the way, also gets to replace a Democratic Justice’s seat.

    This is a principle worth standing up for.

    Gorsuch may be a fine judge. That doesn’t matter. He should not be seated and we should do everything we can to make that the outcome.

    My $0.02.

    Cheers,
    Scott.
    (Who needs to figure out a way to channel his rage about this…)

  99. 99.

    lamh36

    January 31, 2017 at 8:41 pm

    #TeamPerez

    @TomPerez 6h6 hours ago
    More
    Tom Perez Retweeted Senate Democrats
    RT if you agree: We should give Donald Trump the same level of courtesy Mitch McConnell gave to Barack Obama.

  100. 100.

    TenguPhule

    January 31, 2017 at 8:41 pm

    @Brachiator: 10 years of indentured servitude should be punishment enough. They can be leased to the Native Americans as farm workers.

  101. 101.

    Farthestnorth

    January 31, 2017 at 8:42 pm

    Thought the name Gorsuch was familiar. His mom Ann was EPA administrator under Reagan and did her best to wreck it.

  102. 102.

    lamh36

    January 31, 2017 at 8:42 pm

    ‏@NARAL 33m33 minutes ago
    More
    Trump #SCOTUS pick Neil Gorsuch poses an existential threat to legal abortion. The stakes couldn’t be higher when it comes to our rights.

  103. 103.

    Keith G

    January 31, 2017 at 8:43 pm

    Yep, Democrats are in a bit of a fix, but that’s what happens when your grip on political power is based on holding the presidency, having a strong presence on the federal bench, and occasionally running the Senate.

    Been reading the belly aching on Twitter. It’s tiring. Gorsuch will be confirmed and he’ll sit on Supreme Court for the next 30 years. His presence on the court will be minimized if, for the love of God, we can start paying attention to local and state elections and start winning them.

    When the wack-a- loons at the local level start pulling crazy shit, we depend on federal courts to hold them back. How about we just replace the nutters with folks from our side and then sidestep the need of having to depend on the federal bench as much as we do.

    This is something that can have an impact in as little as 10 months from now.

  104. 104.

    Jim, Foolish Literalist

    January 31, 2017 at 8:44 pm

    Mitch McConnell didn’t want hearings for Garland because Garland would’ve appeared like a reasonable and reassuring figure who would be someone the public could support. Let’s hope Gorsusch’s hearings have the opposite effect. Dems are gonna have to be focussed and sharp

  105. 105.

    Adam L Silverman

    January 31, 2017 at 8:45 pm

    @Turgidson: Here’s the definitive takedown. By the only intellectually coherent conservative jurist in the US:
    https://newrepublic.com/article/106441/scalia-garner-reading-the-law-textual-originalism

  106. 106.

    TenguPhule

    January 31, 2017 at 8:46 pm

    @Keith G: We don’t have 10 months. Wake up and smell the iron and steel. Trump and his minions will not allow free and fair elections. They’re cracking down on dissent. They’ll only give up power from cold dead fingers and even then they’ll need to be broken to get them to let go.

  107. 107.

    Lizzy L

    January 31, 2017 at 8:46 pm

    @Another Scott: Yes, agree.
    @lamh36: Yes, agree.

    Make them nuke the filibuster. Because they will.

  108. 108.

    Timurid

    January 31, 2017 at 8:47 pm

    @Lizzy L:

    OBSTRUCT! OBSTRUCT! OBSTRUCT!

  109. 109.

    lamh36

    January 31, 2017 at 8:51 pm

    @SenFeinstein
    JUST NOW: On Sessions attorney general nomination: “I must vote no.”

    YES!!! I know can’t hope for a Blanket NO for ALL of Trump’s picks…but this one feels more personal…ANY Dem that votes YES on Sessions..needs to go

  110. 110.

    Bupalos

    January 31, 2017 at 8:53 pm

    Fine with it. Probably the best one on the list, meaning he’s the least likely to give preclearance to gas chambers. After some reflection, I don’t think there is any win here for us, drag the hearings out, ask a lot of questions about constitutional ramifications of presidential ethical conflicts and foreign interventions in elections, and give him the 9 votes, making the point at every turn that we’re doing it because we won’t lower ourselves to their level.

  111. 111.

    Van Buren

    January 31, 2017 at 8:54 pm

    @TenguPhule: I like the way you think.

  112. 112.

    Lizzy L

    January 31, 2017 at 8:55 pm

    Washington—Senate Judiciary Committee Ranking Member Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) today announced her opposition to the nomination of Senator Jeff Sessions (R-Ala.) as attorney general.

    “It is very difficult to reconcile for me the independence and objectivity necessary for the position of attorney general with the partisanship this nominee has demonstrated,” Feinstein said Tuesday.

    “We are being asked to determine whether this nominee’s record demonstrates that he will have the objectivity to enforce the law for all Americans and be an independent attorney general and not an arm of the White House.

    Yesterday, early in the evening, we clearly saw what a truly independent attorney general does…I have no confidence that Senator Sessions will do that.”

  113. 113.

    NotMax

    January 31, 2017 at 8:56 pm

    @Another Scott

    I think we’re on the same chapter but different pages.

    The seat was Obama’s to offer a nominee for. Which he did. Bottom line is that Garland’s nomination expired at 11:59:59 on the 20th.

    The Senate Rs, particularly by refusing to bring the nomination to committee, were odious (and worse). Rightly so, we decried and lambasted them – and continue to do so – for what they did to derail process. Turning on a dime and saying if the Ds do it it’s all right doesn’t wash.

    I do, however, favor a filibuster (a part of regular process the Rs did NOT employ for Garland).

  114. 114.

    James Powell

    January 31, 2017 at 8:57 pm

    A supreme court justice this bad or worse was a done deal on November 8th.

    Among the many deeply rooted flaws in the Democratic-inclined voter is a complete disregard for the supreme court.

  115. 115.

    Baud

    January 31, 2017 at 8:58 pm

    @James Powell: Yep.

  116. 116.

    amk

    January 31, 2017 at 8:59 pm

    @Another Scott:

    It won’t survive under a system where only the GOP gets to decide who replaces a sitting GOP Justice, and by the way, also gets to replace a Democratic Justice’s seat.

    exactly.

    also. too. all 3 seats of power + ass kissing msm all gop? great checks and balances there.

  117. 117.

    Jim, Foolish Literalist

    January 31, 2017 at 9:00 pm

    Just saw that Katie McGinty in PA lost to Toomey by about 100K votes– the Libertarian got 250K. I wonder how many pseudo-sophisticate (“Social liberal and a fiscal conservative! I read David Brooks and Maureen Dowd!”) suburban tote-baggers voted for Toomey thinking that Clinton had it in the bag and they wanted a “check” on President Hillary.

  118. 118.

    nastybrutishntall

    January 31, 2017 at 9:02 pm

    He’s a nice guy with horrible ideas. He must be stopped.

  119. 119.

    Juju

    January 31, 2017 at 9:02 pm

    @SiubhanDuinne: He was nominating a Supreme Court justice, not hosting a game show, for peets sake!! Does he need the peanut gallery applauding him and whooping every time he gives a speech? Holy cow, what is wrong with that cheetoh colored collection of collagen?

  120. 120.

    Sab

    January 31, 2017 at 9:04 pm

    Trump has managed to please the right-to-lifers and diss his own accomplished (and female) sister by having her former colleague’s name bruited about all day, and then picking the other guy.

    Always the misogynist.

  121. 121.

    Chris T.

    January 31, 2017 at 9:04 pm

    Since Trump lost the popular vote by 3 million, clearly we should leave the seat unfilled until the next administration.

  122. 122.

    Timurid

    January 31, 2017 at 9:09 pm

    I have no idea how accurate this is, but it’s quite disturbing.

  123. 123.

    Mike in NC

    January 31, 2017 at 9:10 pm

    @Juju: We must assume there is a permanent Cult of Trump entourage, 30 to 40 people strong, with their very own dedicated bus, to follow him around on all his rallies. He’s mentally impaired.

  124. 124.

    Adam L Silverman

    January 31, 2017 at 9:21 pm

    @Timurid: I don’t understand how that’s scored. Alito should be to the right of Scalia.

  125. 125.

    NotMax

    January 31, 2017 at 9:28 pm

    @Mike in NC

    Roadie toadies.

  126. 126.

    Villago Delenda Est

    January 31, 2017 at 9:45 pm

    @Timurid: Stolen and posted at Wonkette, to thunderous applause.

  127. 127.

    D58826

    January 31, 2017 at 9:45 pm

    If the D’s don’t grow a spine and use every procedural tactic left to them to block the rest of Trump’s cabinet picks and SCOTUS nominee they will have seen the last dollar I will every send them. I will use the money for something more useful – like the next drunken homeless person I see.

    Why give money to an organization that will not stand up for it principles. They will probably lose but at least go down fighting – you know remember the Alamo kind of thing.

  128. 128.

    Villago Delenda Est

    January 31, 2017 at 9:46 pm

    @Juju: Deep insecurity. He knows he’s a loser; he needs positive reinforcement always.

  129. 129.

    NotoriousJRT

    January 31, 2017 at 9:48 pm

    Looks the part? Gawd, that is nauseating.

  130. 130.

    sunny raines

    January 31, 2017 at 10:04 pm

    no way in hell Senate Dems are fillibustering the SCOTUS picks for 4 years. 1) unlike republicans, Dems believe in the system and are loyal to America, not traitors, 2) unlike obama, trump and the republicans would tear them apart in public. There would never be a single word out of any republican’s mouth without including the travesty of the Dem filibuster.

    repeat after me:

    naa gonnna happin

  131. 131.

    liberal

    January 31, 2017 at 10:21 pm

    @Adam L Silverman: Charles Fried was regularly cited by Ronald Dworkin as a conservative who understood that “originalism” was complete bullshit.

  132. 132.

    SFAW

    January 31, 2017 at 11:28 pm

    @Jim, Foolish Literalist:

    Heitkamp and Minchin have announced they won’t filibuster.

    They’re “keeping their powder dry” for when Shitgibbon nominates Torquemada — then they’ll REALLY consider the idea of a filibuster seriously. For at least 30 seconds.

    And, Mitch, you treasonous, seditious fuck: the PEOPLE — who you said needed to have their say, which is why you wouldn’t let the blackity-black black man get his SCOTUS pick — said they wanted Hillary to name Scalia’s replacement. NOT that fucking narcissistic moron who does whatever his Nazi racist “adviser” wants him to do. You fuck.

  133. 133.

    SFAW

    January 31, 2017 at 11:32 pm

    @Bupalos:

    making the point at every turn that we’re doing it because we won’t lower ourselves to their level.

    Yeah, because Americans LOVE the “high road.” That’s why the Rethugs paid such a heavy price for their bullshit tactics, like the shutdown in 2013.

  134. 134.

    SFAW

    January 31, 2017 at 11:35 pm

    @James Powell:

    Among the many deeply rooted flaws in the Democratic-inclined voter is a complete disregard for the supreme court.

    I am reminded of the Dem voter who wasn’t sure about voting for Hillary, because she wanted someone to give her a “positive” reason to vote for Hillary, “without mentioning Trump or the Supreme Court.” Fucking moron.

  135. 135.

    quakerinabasement

    February 1, 2017 at 12:17 am

    Well, we can’t play the Unqualified card. It’s going to have to be Outside the Mainstream or straight up payback for Garland.

  136. 136.

    TenguPhule

    February 1, 2017 at 3:09 am

    @Bupalos: F the High road. Its obvious the American public wants straight up warfare, otherwise Republicans wouldn’t be taking over after just saying no to civility.

Comments are closed.

Primary Sidebar

Fundraising 2023-24

Wis*Dems Supreme Court + SD-8

Recent Comments

  • Carlo Graziani on War for Ukraine Day 390: The Owl Has Sharp Talons! (Mar 21, 2023 @ 12:08am)
  • Jay on War for Ukraine Day 390: The Owl Has Sharp Talons! (Mar 21, 2023 @ 12:04am)
  • Another Scott on War for Ukraine Day 390: The Owl Has Sharp Talons! (Mar 20, 2023 @ 11:56pm)
  • Jay on War for Ukraine Day 390: The Owl Has Sharp Talons! (Mar 20, 2023 @ 11:55pm)
  • Arclite on War for Ukraine Day 390: The Owl Has Sharp Talons! (Mar 20, 2023 @ 11:51pm)

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
We All Need A Little Kindness
Classified Documents: A Primer
State & Local Elections Discussion

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Mailing List Signup
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)

Twitter / Spoutible

Balloon Juice (Spoutible)
WaterGirl (Spoutible)
TaMara (Spoutible)
John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
TaMara
David Anderson
Major Major Major Major
ActualCitizensUnited

Join the Fight!

Join the Fight Signup Form
All Join the Fight Posts

Balloon Juice Events

5/14  The Apocalypse
5/20  Home Away from Home
5/29  We’re Back, Baby
7/21  Merging!

Balloon Juice for Ukraine

Donate

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2023 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!