• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

“And when the Committee says to “report your income,” that could mean anything!

…and a burning sense of injustice to juice the soul.

My years-long effort to drive family and friends away has really paid off this year.

The gop couldn’t organize an orgy in a whorehouse with a fist full of 50s.

They’re not red states to be hated; they are voter suppression states to be fixed.

Polls are now a reliable indicator of what corporate Republicans want us to think.

I’m just a talker, trying to find a channel!

“But what about the lurkers?”

Nikki Haley, who can’t acknowledge ‘slavery’, is a pathetic shill.

Nothing says ‘pro-life’ like letting children go hungry.

They traffic in fear. it is their only currency. if we are fearful, they are winning.

Balloon Juice, where there is always someone who will say you’re doing it wrong.

“The difference between stupidity and genius is that genius has its limits.”

The revolution will be supervised.

Never entrust democracy to any process that requires Republicans to act in good faith.

Usually wrong but never in doubt

This really is a full service blog.

Nancy smash is sick of your bullshit.

Every reporter and pundit should have to declare if they ever vacationed with a billionaire.

Seems like a complicated subject, have you tried yelling at it?

I did not have this on my fuck 2022 bingo card.

It’s not hopeless, and we’re not helpless.

Happy indictment week to all who celebrate!

If you’re pissed about Biden’s speech, he was talking about you.

Mobile Menu

  • Four Directions Montana
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • COVID-19 Coronavirus
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • 2024 Elections
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • Targeted Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Anderson On Health Insurance / Partisanship and enrollment changes on Healthcare.gov

Partisanship and enrollment changes on Healthcare.gov

by David Anderson|  February 6, 20179:12 am| 13 Comments

This post is in: Anderson On Health Insurance, All we want is life beyond the thunderdome

FacebookTweetEmail

Charles Gaba outlines what happened on Healthcare.gov for final enrollment. The numbers came in lighter than expected.

Then, Donald Trump actually took office…and in a one-two punch, not only signed an executive order which specifically instructed the HHS Dept. to do everything in their power to sabotage the implementation of the ACA, but also attempted to pull the plug on the critical last-minute advertising blitz which is so vital to reminding procrastinators (particularly young ones…you know, the ones who help the risk pool?) to get off their duffs and actually sign up.

The CMS numbers:

On January 31, 2017, Open Enrollment for 2017 coverage ended with more than 9.2 million plan selections in states that use the HealthCare.gov eligibility and enrollment platform.

I was curious about something over the weekend but I was with my kids. I had to chase them and learn about rocket ships.

At the state level, does partisanship have a relationship to enrollment levels. Would states with a higher Trump vote percentage have greater declines in enrollment?

My data is here for any and all to view:

https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B0shrhgU2x-pZ0VXRE9YczZKd1E

I excluded Kentucky from the analysis as they transitioned from Kynect to Healthcare.gov.  I also suppressed Louisiana as they had a mid-year Medicaid expansion so we should expect a massive drop in Louisiana enrollment no matter what (and that is what happened).

UPDATE 1: Removing Hawaii as an outlier transforms the relationship from statistically significant to not significant

The short answer is yes, and significantly so.It is not a perfect relationship as South Dakota and Utah each saw significant gains.  But each point of Trump voters led to 4.5 basis points less enrollment.  A state that perfectly mirrored Trump’s actual popular vote total would have had effectively not lost enrollment.  A 50/50 state would have lost 2.5% of the QHP’s.

What is the mechanism?  I don’t know.  I would bet that elite cuing and partisan information channels would be a major part of this explanation.  Trusted sources in red states were telling people that the markets were blowing up and outreach efforts were either hobbled or sidelined so the marginal people who were making the last buy/no buy decisions were making incremental no buy decisions.  I think if we see an older than expected risk pool, that will be a chunk of evidence in support of that idea.

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « Linking subsidies to price paper
Next Post: ICYMI: Our Would-Be Ruler Verbally Assaults A Federal Judge »

Reader Interactions

13Comments

  1. 1.

    ArchTeryx

    February 6, 2017 at 9:25 am

    This article sort of buries the lede: That in a lot of red states, partisanship is so strong it literally trumps people’s desire for health coverage. I’m sure most of them don’t think in these terms, but these people are literally offering themselves up as cannon fodder for their ideology. When some sizable fraction of them gets cancer, heart disease, diabetes or some other lethal, chronic condition, will they go to their early graves blaming Obama and the Democrats?

    Talk about a self-culling herd!

    Not for the first time do I wish chronic illness was far more prevalent. It all comes down to not enough people *know* someone suffering from chronic illness, or are suffering themselves. We’re a marginalized minority like any other, to the point that people aren’t afraid enough to get health insurance if it clashes with their ideology.

    And it’s powerful. Here’s my little bit of anecdata.

    I had to threaten to terminate the relationship of my now-fiancee before she’d get on Expanded Medicaid. She has no thyroid. Not having health care would be *lethal* for her, same as me, and yet she’d been raised in the right-wing tradition of never, ever accepting government handouts, and she was willing to take that to her grave.

    I told her that I wasn’t willing to watch her kill herself for sake of a bankrupt ideology. That was enough of a wake-up for her to get on Expanded Medicaid, and it kept her alive until she found a job.

    How many of these deluded souls won’t be so lucky?

  2. 2.

    greennotGreen

    February 6, 2017 at 9:30 am

    Correlation doesn’t equal causation, of course. Perhaps there’s one other factor that explains both the drop in enrollment and the conservative-controlled state governments: the citizens of those states are sack-of-hammers-dumb.

    – a Tennessean, so I know whereof I speak.

  3. 3.

    ArchTeryx

    February 6, 2017 at 9:32 am

    @greennotGreen: In this case, causation is almost irrelevant. These are people who are basically partisanshipping themeselves into an early grave, maybe a VERY early one. They’re voluntary martyrs for their own cause. That may be because they’re dumber then my ginger cat and can’t see cause and effect if it hits them in the face like a thrown rock. But the end will be the same.

  4. 4.

    David Anderson

    February 6, 2017 at 9:39 am

    @greennotGreen: But the sack of dumb-shittedness should be fairly invariant within a state year over year. It shifts but it is a slow shifter not a fast shifter.

    Holding dumb-shittedness constant some number of people signed up in 2016 and some people signed up in 2017. There is variance. Why?

  5. 5.

    Nunca El Jefe

    February 6, 2017 at 9:58 am

    I don’t have access to work with your data right now, so I will just ask, what happens to your fit and model if you exclude that point from Hawaii?

  6. 6.

    OzarkHillbilly

    February 6, 2017 at 10:02 am

    We’re #1! We’re #1!

    I am so proud of my state.

  7. 7.

    BBA

    February 6, 2017 at 10:04 am

    It’s also possible that people figured with Trump taking office Obamacare would be shut down immediately and there’d be no point in buying insurance that would instantly go away at noon on January 20th.

    Now you and I know that it doesn’t work that way. But your average person on the street doesn’t know that.

  8. 8.

    rikyrah

    February 6, 2017 at 10:05 am

    Thanks for this info, Mayhew

  9. 9.

    greennotGreen

    February 6, 2017 at 10:28 am

    @David Anderson: More toxic Kool-Aid?

  10. 10.

    David Anderson

    February 6, 2017 at 10:40 am

    @Nunca El Jefe: Very good point — taking out Hawaii takes away the relationship … still have the downward slope but no longer significant.

  11. 11.

    Mnemosyne

    February 6, 2017 at 12:24 pm

    I know that California continued their advertising blitz for Covered CA (our state exchanges), so I’m guessing that may be part of the calculus. If states that have their own exchanges continued advertising, then they would have better enrollment than states that rely solely on Healthcare.gov to get the word out.

  12. 12.

    sunny raines

    February 6, 2017 at 1:25 pm

    just more early deaths and degraded lives on republican hands (small as they are, they are enormous when it comes to facilitating innocent deaths.)

  13. 13.

    Clem

    February 6, 2017 at 3:38 pm

    You are looking at 39 states and missing the states with their own exchanges. Wonder how the 11 states compare to the 39 states and what would all 50 states look like?

Comments are closed.

Primary Sidebar

Recent Comments

  • wjca on Humpty Trumpty (Open Thread) (Apr 17, 2024 @ 7:25pm)
  • sab on Humpty Trumpty (Open Thread) (Apr 17, 2024 @ 7:24pm)
  • smith on Humpty Trumpty (Open Thread) (Apr 17, 2024 @ 7:24pm)
  • Omnes Omnibus on Humpty Trumpty (Open Thread) (Apr 17, 2024 @ 7:22pm)
  • SiubhanDuinne on Humpty Trumpty (Open Thread) (Apr 17, 2024 @ 7:22pm)

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Balloon Juice Meetups!

All Meetups
Talk of Meetups – Meetup Planning
Proposed BJ meetups list from frosty

Fundraising 2023-24

Wis*Dems Supreme Court + SD-8
Virginia House Races
Four Directions – Montana
Worker Power AZ
Four Directions – Arizona
Four Directions – Nevada

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
Positive Climate News
War in Ukraine
Cole’s “Stories from the Road”
Classified Documents Primer

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Mailing List Signup
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)

Fix Nyms with Apostrophes

Balloon Juice for Ukraine

Donate

Twitter / Spoutible

Balloon Juice (Spoutible)
WaterGirl (Spoutible)
TaMara (Spoutible)
John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
David Anderson
Major Major Major Major
ActualCitizensUnited

Political Action 2024

Postcard Writing Information

Balloon Juice for Four Directions AZ

Donate

Balloon Juice for Four Directions NV

Donate

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2024 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!