• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

Peak wingnut was a lie.

Republicans want to make it harder to vote and easier for them to cheat.

It’s all just conspiracy shit beamed down from the mothership.

Optimism opens the door to great things.

We are builders in a constant struggle with destroyers. let’s win this.

Jack be nimble, jack be quick, hurry up and indict this prick.

Accountability, motherfuckers.

This blog will pay for itself.

Technically true, but collectively nonsense

You don’t get rid of your umbrella while it’s still raining.

Fuck these fucking interesting times.

He really is that stupid.

if you can’t see it, then you are useless in the fight to stop it.

“Jesus paying for the sins of everyone is an insult to those who paid for their own sins.”

Fani Willis claps back at Trump chihuahua, Jim Jordan.

This really is a full service blog.

Just because you believe it, that doesn’t make it true.

Ah, the different things are different argument.

DeSantis transforms Florida into 1930s Germany with gators and theme parks.

Not so fun when the rabbit gets the gun, is it?

Schmidt just says fuck it, opens a tea shop.

Never entrust democracy to any process that requires republicans to act in good faith.

Red lights blinking on democracy’s dashboard

“That’s what the insurrection act is for!”

Mobile Menu

  • Winnable House Races
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • Balloon Juice 2023 Pet Calendar (coming soon)
  • COVID-19 Coronavirus
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • War in Ukraine
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • 2021-22 Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Anderson On Health Insurance / Revisiting the three legged stool

Revisiting the three legged stool

by David Anderson|  February 24, 201711:28 am| 7 Comments

This post is in: Anderson On Health Insurance

FacebookTweetEmail

Paul Krugman has used the three legged stool analogy to describe the ACA several times.  It is an analogy that is vivid in its description and useful in its implications:

Yes! The Court (minus the three stooges) understood that the ACA is designed to work via the “three-legged stool” of guaranteed issue and community rating, the individual mandate, and subsidies. All three elements are needed to make it work, which is why it was obvious to anyone who paid any attention that the lawsuit was nonsense.

There is a problem with this analogy.  It is too specific.

There are three legs of the stool.  Two can stand without modification.  Guarantee issue with community rating stands as a firm leg.  It means that anyone can get a policy at a standard rate.  In the ACA, that standard rate is based on the county or zip code of residence and age of the applicant.  Subsidies also are a firm leg.  They help people who can not afford the standard rate pay for the standard rate.

The third leg of the stool is a pool participation mechanism.  The individual mandate is a specific type of the third leg.  There are other mechanical techniques that can fundamentally perform the same needed function of getting people who think that they will be relatively healthy and low utilizers into the insured risk pool.  100% subsidy for the premium and auto-enrollment with an opt-out performs the same function as the mandate in getting healthy people in the pool.  It would force a lot more healthy people into the pool at a higher expenditure for a given level of actuarial value coverage.  Late enrollment penalties like those used in Medicare that are long lasting and significant are another approach to get healthy people in the current period into the pool.  Multi-year contracts that extend the zone of uncertainty and risk theoretically perform the same function.

All of these techniques are ways to minimize the cost gap between not being covered at all and being covered at a minimal level while participating in the pool.  They attack the same problem from a variety of angles but they are functionally similar to each other.

So the actual three legged stool of the ACA is community-rated guarantee issue, subsidies and pool participation mechanism.  Keep this in mind as we again talk health reform over the next year.

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « Something Nice
Next Post: Age based subsidies and geographic disparities »

Reader Interactions

7Comments

  1. 1.

    Baud

    February 24, 2017 at 11:39 am

    Late enrollment penalties like those used in Medicare that are long lasting and significant are another approach to get healthy people in the current period into the pool.

    Out of curiosity, how many people sign up late for Medicare?

    And Krugman isn’t wrong to the extent he was describing how the ACA actually works, as opposed to how a generic health reform law might work. I know you essentially said that, but I thought it was worth emphasizing.

  2. 2.

    rikyrah

    February 24, 2017 at 11:46 am

    thanks for breaking it down for us.

  3. 3.

    Major Major Major Major

    February 24, 2017 at 11:48 am

    How does Boehner’s saying that congress is just going to make Obamacare slightly worse, rebrand it PersonalResponsibilityCare, and call it a day change your outlook?

  4. 4.

    Fair Economist

    February 24, 2017 at 12:14 pm

    However, mandates are certainly the cheapest pool participation mechanism for the government, which is creating particularly large headaches for the Republicans trying to scam the public with one of their lousy “replacements”. No PPM = market collapse, any other PPM = huge cost increases. It’s quite possible they’ll do some really inferior PPM (like the continuous coverage provision) which will produce both effects – huge cost increases, but the market collapses anyway because they’re not huge enough.

  5. 5.

    Hoodie

    February 24, 2017 at 12:54 pm

    There’s no problem with the analogy for the context in which it was being used. Krugman was talking about the ridiculous legal arguments for severability, with the mandate being the ppm that was included in the legislation. Yours describe theoretical alternatives that were not in the legislation.

  6. 6.

    DanF

    February 24, 2017 at 1:36 pm

    Why we lose –
    Liberals: “Well, technically, the third leg can be made of poplar if the other two are made of oak.”
    Conservatives: “See? Liberals know Obamacare is a mess!”

    I appreciate nuance as much as the next person, but Krugman really isn’t wrong in his assessment.

  7. 7.

    Stillwater

    February 24, 2017 at 2:27 pm

    So the actual three legged stool of the ACA is community-rated guarantee issue, subsidies and pool participation mechanism. Keep this in mind as we again talk health reform over the next year.

    What other pool participation mechanisms are out there? One I’ve thought about is that for every year an individual doesn’t pay into the pool by declining to get insurance they pay a penalty on the back-end reflected in increased price once they sign up. But that doesn’t really work for low-income folks (for one thing) and also penalizes the current market-participants in the form of allowing free-riding.

    Any others?

Comments are closed.

Primary Sidebar

Recent Comments

  • Villago Delenda Est on What’s the Matter with Kansas Ohio? (Sep 22, 2023 @ 1:17pm)
  • WaterGirl on Senator Menendez (D-NJ) indicted for corruption (again) (Sep 22, 2023 @ 1:16pm)
  • Villago Delenda Est on What’s the Matter with Kansas Ohio? (Sep 22, 2023 @ 1:15pm)
  • J. Arthur Crank (fka Jerzy Russian) on Bibi & Bone Saw (Sep 22, 2023 @ 1:15pm)
  • Baud on Bibi & Bone Saw (Sep 22, 2023 @ 1:15pm)

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
We All Need A Little Kindness
What Has Biden Done for You Lately?

Balloon Juice Meetups!

All Meetups
Talk of Meetups – Meetup Planning

Fundraising 2023-24

Wis*Dems Supreme Court + SD-8

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Mailing List Signup
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)

Twitter / Spoutible

Balloon Juice (Spoutible)
WaterGirl (Spoutible)
TaMara (Spoutible)
John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
TaMara
David Anderson
Major Major Major Major
ActualCitizensUnited

Join the Fight!

Join the Fight Signup Form
All Join the Fight Posts

Balloon Juice for Ukraine

Donate

Cole & Friends Learn Español

Introductory Post
Cole & Friends Learn Español

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2023 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!