• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

You’re just a puppy masquerading as an old coot.

So it was an October Surprise A Day, like an Advent calendar but for crime.

SCOTUS: It’s not “bribery” unless it comes from the Bribery region of France. Otherwise, it’s merely “sparkling malfeasance”.

If you thought you’d already seen people saying the stupidest things possible on the internet, prepare yourselves.

Balloon Juice, where there is always someone who will say you’re doing it wrong.

Giving up is unforgivable.

People are complicated. Love is not.

I desperately hope that, yet again, i am wrong.

My right to basic bodily autonomy is not on the table. that’s the new deal.

Just because you believe it, that does not make it true.

Compromise? There is no middle ground between a firefighter and an arsonist.

Not rolling over. fuck you, make me.

Fear or fury? The choice is ours.

Pessimism assures that nothing of any importance will change.

Republicans cannot even be trusted with their own money.

I’d like to think you all would remain faithful to me if i ever tried to have some of you killed.

“The defense has a certain level of trust in defendant that the government does not.”

With all due respect and assumptions of good faith, please fuck off into the sun.

Republican speaker of the house Mike Johnson is the bland and smiling face of evil.

We are builders in a constant struggle with destroyers. keep building.

If rights aren’t universal, they are privilege, not rights.

They were going to turn on one another at some point. It was inevitable.

The gop is a fucking disgrace.

Following reporting rules is only for the little people, apparently.

Mobile Menu

  • Seattle Meet-up Post
  • 2025 Activism
  • Targeted Political Fundraising
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • COVID-19
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • 2025 Activism
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • Targeted Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Anderson On Health Insurance / Rich data sets and risk adjustment

Rich data sets and risk adjustment

by David Anderson|  June 2, 20177:26 am| 9 Comments

This post is in: Anderson On Health Insurance

FacebookTweetEmail

I had a lot of fun talking about risk adjustment yesterday. Michael Kalina is an insurance plumber who worked at a co-op and he raised a very good point.

I have long believed that legacy companies are able to use institutional knowledge to "enhance" their results, which creates asymmetries.

— Michael Kalina (@MPKalina) June 1, 2017

I agree completely with him. Deep data sets across multiple lines of business are extremely valuable if they are properly used in risk adjustment projections and risk adjustment revenue optimization.

When I left UPMC Health Plan, I was running the data mining for the Medicaid risk adjustment optimization team. We were active in most lines of business; Medicaid, Medicare Advantage, Medicare SNP, CHIP, Exchange, and employer sponsored insurance. Our optimization program required a diagnosis on a valid claim within a reference period. The data mining looked for highly probable persistent diagnoses that had shown up previously but had not yet shown up in the reference period.

The best use example is a lower leg amputation. Once a leg is gone, it is gone. My data mining looked at Medicaid claims, it looked at Medicare claims, it looked at Exchange claims, it looked at group claims. And if there was strong evidence from a 2005 group claim for a brand new to Medicaid member, a gap would be identified for the 2017 risk adjustment cycle. Similar logic played out for the Exchange and the Medicare Advantage risk adjustment teams.

New insurers would miss that risk adjustment gain. Insurers that only offered coverage in a single line of business like the individual market would miss that potential gain. Insurers with multiple lines of business but small market share in a region would miss a significant proportion of the gains from data mining.

Rich data sets are an extremely valuable asset and competitive advantage for locally significant legacy carriers.

Now what are the policy implications of this fact of life?

Good, widespread information is critical. States that have all payer claims databases should be sending identifiable diagnosis and procedure code data to all risk adjusted product lines for all carriers. This would allow new carriers and tightly focused carriers to get a significant data flow that they would otherwise not have. It would increase the probability that a high probability of being an actual gap is identified as a gap in the risk adjustment revenue chase.

Another approach would be for a state or a collection of states to keep a list of truly persistent conditions for individuals. Any condition on this list would be automatically attributed to the risk adjustment score of the insurer. A diagnosis or a prescription would not be required. For instance, a state could decide that an amputation is a truly persistent condition. If a person was identified as having a leg amputation in a previous year, there would no need for an insurer to see a Z-status code submitted in the current year to get credit. This list of truly persistent conditions would be small (amputations, organ transplant status codes, cystic fibrosis, HIV status codes etc) and it would be an additive list. This again minimizes the inherent big data advantage of long established multi-line carriers. They can still mine their data for the non-obvious but the obvious is common property.

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « Show me the waiver
Next Post: Santa Fe Meetup »

Reader Interactions

9Comments

  1. 1.

    low-tech cyclist

    June 2, 2017 at 8:05 am

    And if there was strong evidence from a 2005 group claim for a brand new to Medicaid member, a gap would be identified for the 2017 risk adjustment cycle.

    It would increase the probability that a high probability of being an actual gap is identified as a gap in the risk adjustment revenue chase.

    David, could you explain how you’re using the word ‘gap’ here? Thanks!

  2. 2.

    David Anderson

    June 2, 2017 at 8:09 am

    @low-tech cyclist: yes. A gap is a diagnosis that we think is valid but not showing up on a claim in the study period

  3. 3.

    Humboldtblue

    June 2, 2017 at 8:35 am

    I had a lot of fun talking about risk adjustment yesterday

    You’re a weird dude, dude.

  4. 4.

    David Anderson

    June 2, 2017 at 8:39 am

    @Humboldtblue: yes, yes I am

  5. 5.

    Michael Kalina

    June 2, 2017 at 9:23 am

    So… where were the gaps sent? A medical management team?

  6. 6.

    low-tech cyclist

    June 2, 2017 at 10:58 am

    @David Anderson: Thanks! Your post makes a lot more sense now.

  7. 7.

    RobertB

    June 2, 2017 at 12:41 pm

    My experience with this (Worker’s Compensation claims) is way old, but I remember the states we were dealing with were jealous of their data. It could have been our naivete, but we were trying to sell the idea of sharing the data for just such a thing, and the states were aghast at the notion of pooling their data. This was back before Big Data was a thing. We were all jackleg DBAs (although good C++ developers), and their reluctance could very well have been at the idea of letting us monkey around with their data.

  8. 8.

    WereBear

    June 2, 2017 at 1:01 pm

    Read this and thought of you, David Anderson:

    On Buzzfeed: Over a Million Christans have opted out of healthcare

  9. 9.

    Eric

    June 5, 2017 at 8:24 pm

    Would larger companies who have the data consider this a competitive advantage and proprietary? If so, wouldn’t those who have the data, who are also likely the largest and have the most political influence, be against sharing or requiring them to share?

Comments are closed.

Primary Sidebar

On The Road - Albatrossity - Flyover Country Spring 2
Image by Albatrossity (5/18/25)

Recent Comments

  • Jay on Sunday Diversion: ‘A Dumb New Way To Think About The Dismantling Of The Federal Government’ (May 18, 2025 @ 6:55pm)
  • Jeffro on Failure to Launch (Open Thread) (May 18, 2025 @ 6:55pm)
  • Geminid on Sunday Diversion: ‘A Dumb New Way To Think About The Dismantling Of The Federal Government’ (May 18, 2025 @ 6:55pm)
  • Jeffro on Failure to Launch (Open Thread) (May 18, 2025 @ 6:54pm)
  • Elizabelle on Sunday Diversion: ‘A Dumb New Way To Think About The Dismantling Of The Federal Government’ (May 18, 2025 @ 6:54pm)

PA Supreme Court At Risk

Donate

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
War in Ukraine
Donate to Razom for Ukraine

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

Meetups

Upcoming Ohio Meetup May 17
5/11 Post about the May 17 Ohio Meetup

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)
Fix Nyms with Apostrophes

Hands Off! – Denver, San Diego & Austin

Social Media

Balloon Juice
WaterGirl
TaMara
John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
David Anderson
Major Major Major Major
DougJ NYT Pitchbot
mistermix

Keeping Track

Legal Challenges (Lawfare)
Republicans Fleeing Town Halls (TPM)
21 Letters (to Borrow or Steal)
Search Donations from a Brand

PA Supreme Court At Risk

Donate

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2025 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!