Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

We’ll be taking my thoughts and prayers to the ballot box.

So it was an October Surprise A Day, like an Advent calendar but for crime.

But frankly mr. cole, I’ll be happier when you get back to telling us to go fuck ourselves.

“Jesus paying for the sins of everyone is an insult to those who paid for their own sins.”

Let there be snark.

Thanks to your bullshit, we are now under siege.

Black Jesus loves a paper trail.

Give the craziest people you know everything they want and hope they don’t ask for more? Great plan.

They love authoritarianism, but only when they get to be the authoritarians.

You don’t get rid of your umbrella while it’s still raining.

Impressively dumb. Congratulations.

Do not shrug your shoulders and accept the normalization of untruths.

Republicans don’t want a speaker to lead them; they want a hostage.

They think we are photo bombing their nice little lives.

Bark louder, little dog.

You can’t attract Republican voters. You can only out organize them.

Authoritarian republicans are opposed to freedom for the rest of us.

Nancy smash is sick of your bullshit.

Proof that we need a blogger ethics panel.

Not so fun when the rabbit gets the gun, is it?

They traffic in fear. it is their only currency. if we are fearful, they are winning.

The party of Reagan has become the party of Putin.

Let me eat cake. The rest of you could stand to lose some weight, frankly.

The words do not have to be perfect.

You are here: Home / Politics / Trumpery / Dolt 45 / How About “Fuck You Right in the Eye?”

How About “Fuck You Right in the Eye?”

by | 33 Comments

This post is in: ,

This fucking asshat:

WikiLeaks suggested on Sunday that its founder, Julian Assange, should lead the U.S.-Russian cyber security unit after President Trump announced the idea on Twitter.

“Why not put @JulianAssange in charge of it? He’s trusted by the public and has the CIA’s best stuff anyway,” WikiLeaks tweeted, replying to Trump’s tweet announcing he and Russian President Vladimir Putin discussed the idea.

Nice mullet. Go eat a bag of e-dicks in your embassy broom closet.

Reader Interactions

33Comments

  1. 1.

    Hal

    https://www.nytimes.com/2017/07/09/us/politics/trump-russia-kushner-manafort.html

    President Trump’s eldest son, Donald Trump Jr., was promised damaging information about Hillary Clinton before agreeing to meet with a Kremlin-connected Russian lawyer during the 2016 campaign, according to three advisers to the White House briefed on the meeting and two others with knowledge of it.

    The meeting was also attended by his campaign chairman at the time, Paul J. Manafort, and his son-in-law, Jared Kushner. Mr. Manafort and Mr. Kushner only recently disclosed the meeting, though not its content, in confidential government documents described to The New York Times.

    The Times reported the existence of the meeting on Saturday. But in subsequent interviews, the advisers and others revealed the motivation behind it.

    The meeting — at Trump Tower on June 9, 2016, two weeks after Donald J. Trump clinched the Republican nomination — points to the central question in federal investigations of the Kremlin’s meddling in the presidential election: whether the Trump campaign colluded with the Russians. The accounts of the meeting represent the first public indication that at least some in the campaign were willing to accept Russian help.

  2. 2.

    zhena gogolia

    @Hal:

    This nightmare, this nightmare. Our country is in the power of traitors, and what can we do about it?

  4. 4.

    MisterForkbeard

    Julian Assange: Not trusted by the public, knowingly took Russian hacked and stolen information in order to damage Hillary Clinton’s presidential chances.

    I don’t advise violence as a solution, but someone needs to go punch Assange in the nuts for a few hours.

    @Hal: Gotta love this:

    The accounts of the meeting represent the first public indication that at least some in the campaign were willing to accept Russian help.

    1. The first public indication, other than Trump literally fucking asking for Russian help in a campaign speech.

    2. “some in the campaign” apparently means Trump’s son, his son-in-law who is currently very highly placed in the administration, and his goddamned campaign manager. How is this “some in the campaign” and not “the campaign”, you worthless twits?

  9. 9.

    Frankensteinbeck

    HA! Forget how the public looks at him. Assange is a paranoid of the ‘assassins are hiding in the bushes’ level. It would be a hilarious clusterfuck that accomplishes nothing, like four fifths of Trump’s executive plans.

    @Hal:
    Isn’t that flat-out, no-guesswork collusion? The fire the smoke implied was happening?

  10. 10.

    Hal

    So maybe all these firings were to protect Kushner and Don Jr. Don Jr. especially, because in the end Trump probably doesn’t five a fuck about anyone not directly related to him by blood. I cannot believe that Trump did not know about this meeting at least after the fact.

  11. 11.

    Patricia Kayden

    @Hal: So yet another smoking gun is revealed but life goes on as usual. Trump really can shoot someone and get away with it.

  12. 12.

    Shell

    “Why not put @JulianAssange in charge of it? He’s trusted by the public an

    What public would that be? The Lollipop League? Bizzaro Land?

    As each day goes on, ‘WTF’ can no longer express it.

  13. 13.

    ? ?? Goku (aka The Hope of the Universe) ? ?

    @Patricia Kayden: He could probably beat up Melania as well as Barron on video and McConnell and Ryan would say that Melania might have been a cheating bitch and Barron a snot-nosed brat who needed a good smack

  14. 14.

    ? ?? Goku (aka The Hope of the Universe) ? ?

    @MisterForkbeard: Right! And so is being put on a medieval stretching rack. Exercising those muscles and loosening those tight joints

  15. 15.

    Tokyokie

    At right after we put Julian Assange in charge of cybersecurity, we can appoint Bernie Madoff to head the SEC.

  18. 18.

    Gravenstone

    @zhena gogolia: Find them guilty as charged following trial. Line them all up against the wall. And put them out of our collective misery, with their bodies left to rot in place under 24 hour guard.

  19. 19.

    efgoldman

    @Hal:

    in the end Trump probably doesn’t five a fuck about anyone not directly related to him

    In the end, he gives a flying fuck about NOBODY other than himself.
    If it comes to saving his own ass, he’ll lie, cheat and steal to shift the blame on to every fucking one of them: Princess Ivanka, Kushkie, Uday, Qusay, whoever. All under the bus :::thump:::thump:::

  21. 21.

    debbie

    I didn’t think there could be anything worse than Putin setting up an impenetrable secure voting, but then there was this.

  22. 22.

    sukabi

    Putin’s grabbed his püssŷ

    Я считаю, что совершенно неважно, кто и как будет в партии голосовать; но вот что чрезвычайно важно, это – кто и как будет считать голоса.

  23. 23.

    efgoldman

    @Tokyokie:

    right after we put Julian Assange in charge of cybersecurity, we can appoint Bernie Madoff to head the SEC.

    And get Jill Stein to head DoD, too. And maybe put Cardinal Dolan on the board of Planned Parenthood.

    I still don’t understand why the Ecuadorans don’t just throw him the fuck out.

  24. 24.

    Bruce K

    I say Assange can go screw himself – and before anyone says that’s anatomically impossible, that objection can be answered with a steak knife and a corkscrew.

  25. 25.

    Radiumgirl

    @MisterForkbeard: This kind of understatement is for the lawyers. Or else for the sources. The journalistic credo is not to draw conclusions beyond what your sources are willing to support. That accounts for a lot of the wobbly language you read in these reports.

  26. 26.

    DLew On Roids

    Julian Assange probably knows less about cybersecurity than the average Carnegie Mellon freshman.

  28. 28.

    Don Beal

    You people are unbelievable about Assange. Been watching this website forever and I give up.

  31. 31.

    No One You Know

    @? ?? Goku (aka The Hope of the Universe) ? ?: Not that long ago I sat on a jury for a case that almost literally adjudicated that situation. It was astonishing how easily the defendant’s justifications then sound like Trump’s now.

    SOB found guilty on all counts then. Hoping for the same here…and soon. While we still have a justice system.

  32. 32.

    piratedan

    @? ?? Goku (aka The Hope of the Universe) ? ?: some folks just don’t want to give up on what they hoped would be people who represented themselves as champions for truth and justice only to find that their supposed paladins were tainted, stained and not who they claimed to be.

    sure, I go into this knowing that that US no longer has a claim on any kind of moral superiority and can still improve in many ways, but I have a hard time buying into any political savior wanna-be that has to hide out in an embassy to avoid the legalities of what they’ve allegedly done.

Comments are closed.