• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

A thin legal pretext to veneer over their personal religious and political desires

I’ve spoken to my cat about this, but it doesn’t seem to do any good.

Bark louder, little dog.

It may be funny to you motherfucker, but it’s not funny to me.

Consistently wrong since 2002

If you are still in the GOP, you are an extremist.

Why did Dr. Oz lose? well, according to the exit polls, it’s because Fetterman won.

Jesus, Mary, & Joseph how is that election even close?

It’s always darkest before the other shoe drops.

“But what about the lurkers?”

Wow, you are pre-disappointed. How surprising.

I like you, you’re my kind of trouble.

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

Being the leader of the world means to be the leader of peace.

Republicans are the party of chaos and catastrophe.

You don’t get to peddle hatred on saturday and offer condolences on sunday.

Not so fun when the rabbit gets the gun, is it?

And now I have baud making fun of me. this day can’t get worse.

I’m pretty sure there’s only one Jack Smith.

It’s time for the GOP to dust off that post-2012 autopsy, completely ignore it, and light the party on fire again.

Is it irresponsible to speculate? It is irresponsible not to.

Nothing worth doing is easy.

Tick tock motherfuckers!

Our job is not to persuade republicans but to defeat them.

Mobile Menu

  • Winnable House Races
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • Balloon Juice 2023 Pet Calendar (coming soon)
  • COVID-19 Coronavirus
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • War in Ukraine
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • 2021-22 Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Anderson On Health Insurance / Medicare Advantage payment advantage: Leverage or avoidance?

Medicare Advantage payment advantage: Leverage or avoidance?

by David Anderson|  July 13, 20177:13 am| 11 Comments

This post is in: Anderson On Health Insurance

FacebookTweetEmail

This is a follow-up on a previous post regarding the difference in fees physicians get paid by Traditional Medicare (TM) and Medicare Advantage(MA). I am riffing on the JAMA paper by Erin Trish, Paul Ginsburg and Laura Gascue as they found that MA tended to pay lower effective rates than TM for common codes.

My question that has been slow roasting is whether or not this price differential is due to leverage of Medicare Advantage providers to steer their patients or avoidance of high cost providers. My intuition suggests both to some degree.

Leverage would be expressed by all providers that are participating in a Medicare Advantage network taking lower rates from the Medicare Advantage insurer than they take from Traditional Medicare. The principle mechanism of price reduction would be the credible threat that insurers would move a provide to either a lower tier on a multi-tier network or completely out of network so that the Medicare Advantage beneficiary faces prospectively higher cost sharing to go to that doctor.

Avoidance would be that the providers in the Medicare Advantage network are being paid their standard Traditional Medicare rates. Providers who for one reason or another have a higher base Traditional Medicare rate are dis proportionally excluded from the network.

The key test is how are providers with a high cost structure in Traditional Medicare treated. If they are taking a percentage hair cut but are in network, it is more of a Leverage story. If they are not in the network, it is more of an Avoidance story.

I am not sure what the policy implications of either answer would be; I am just really curious.

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « Thursday Morning Open Thread
Next Post: New information is all that matters »

Reader Interactions

11Comments

  1. 1.

    John Cole

    July 13, 2017 at 7:44 am

    tl;dr

    I slay myself.

  2. 2.

    dr. bloor

    July 13, 2017 at 7:44 am

    My guess would be leverage, such as it is; those pricing differentials aren’t that bad provided the Advantage patients don’t flood your practice. However, I would also guess that the Medicare Advantage patients are getting 3 AM appointment times for their CT scans.

  3. 3.

    satby

    July 13, 2017 at 7:55 am

    @John Cole: thought you were supposed to write this one?

  4. 4.

    HeleninEire

    July 13, 2017 at 7:59 am

    @John Cole: Get your own schtick, Cole.

  5. 5.

    pamelabrown53

    July 13, 2017 at 8:03 am

    @satby:
    Good morning! Is your reply indicative of an insider joke that is whizzing over my head?!

  6. 6.

    David Anderson

    July 13, 2017 at 8:58 am

    @pamelabrown53: John was complaining about his first comment on a music post being TLDR. So I asked him to write a risk adjustment post for me

  7. 7.

    satby

    July 13, 2017 at 9:19 am

    @dr. bloor: not really 3am but absurdly inconvenient times and long waits to get an appointment, you mean?

  8. 8.

    pamelabrown53

    July 13, 2017 at 10:28 am

    @David Anderson:
    Thanks David for both the reply and all the wonderful info you impart.

  9. 9.

    Another Scott

    July 13, 2017 at 12:32 pm

    Dead thread but…

    Sorry if I’m missing something obvious – wouldn’t be the first time. :-)

    The graph shows that MA pays about the same as TM for those particular codes. In addition, you tell us that MA pays less than TM for other particular codes.

    Since MA costs (somebody? Beuler?) more than TM – it has to, given TM’s extremely low overhead, right? – why in a rational system would we want MA? It’s not somehow applying the Secret Magic of the Marketplace Sauce to control costs (at least not according to the data above, as I understand it). It’s not raising payments to providers, and it costs enrollees more than TM (right?)

    The reduced payments to providers is would seemingly be used to fun[d] hookers-and-blow parties at the insurance companies with little benefit to the system as a whole. Of course, congresspeople who wrote the laws and their PACs get donations from the MA industry, so there’s that. But is there any other systemic benefit?

    I understand from your earlier post that MA is much more effective than it was when it was first created. It still seems like it can be too-easily gamed though to prevent people from getting the care they’re paying for.

    Thanks.

    Cheers,
    Scott.

  10. 10.

    arielibra

    July 13, 2017 at 2:47 pm

    a Leverage story

    The Price Differential Job was not one of my favorite episodes.

  11. 11.

    lahke

    July 13, 2017 at 5:58 pm

    Question: you are comparing MA to traditional Medicare in the narrative, but the chart is comparing MA to commercial rates, which tend to be higher than Medicare (which accords with the data shown). So are MA rates between commercial and traditional medicare, or even lower than traditional medicare?

Comments are closed.

Primary Sidebar

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

2023 Pet Calendars

Pet Calendar Preview: A
Pet Calendar Preview: B

*Calendars can not be ordered until Cafe Press gets their calendar paper in.

Recent Comments

  • sab on Late Night Open Thread: Debating The Dubious Privilege of Being Obnoxious in Public (Feb 6, 2023 @ 5:06am)
  • Tony Jay on Late Night Open Thread: Debating The Dubious Privilege of Being Obnoxious in Public (Feb 6, 2023 @ 5:02am)
  • 206inKY on Late Night Open Thread: Debating The Dubious Privilege of Being Obnoxious in Public (Feb 6, 2023 @ 5:01am)
  • NotMax on Late Night Open Thread: Debating The Dubious Privilege of Being Obnoxious in Public (Feb 6, 2023 @ 4:58am)
  • Tony Jay on Late Night Open Thread: Debating The Dubious Privilege of Being Obnoxious in Public (Feb 6, 2023 @ 4:49am)

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
We All Need A Little Kindness
Favorite Dogs & Cats
Classified Documents: A Primer

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Mailing List Signup
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)

Front-pager Twitter

John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
TaMara
David Anderson
ActualCitizensUnited

Shop Amazon via this link to support Balloon Juice   

Join the Fight!

Join the Fight Signup Form
All Join the Fight Posts

Balloon Juice Events

5/14  The Apocalypse
5/20  Home Away from Home
5/29  We’re Back, Baby
7/21  Merging!

Balloon Juice for Ukraine

Donate

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2023 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!