• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

We need to vote them all out and restore sane Democratic government.

These are not very smart people, and things got out of hand.

Dumb motherfuckers cannot understand a consequence that most 4 year olds have fully sorted out.

Mediocre white men think RFK Jr’s pathetic midlife crisis is inspirational. The bar is set so low for them, it’s subterranean.

If senate republicans had any shame, they’d die of it.

Proof that we need a blogger ethics panel.

If a good thing happens for a bad reason, it’s still a good thing.

Shut up, hissy kitty!

Wow, I can’t imagine what it was like to comment in morse code.

Republicans choose power over democracy, every day.

The party of Reagan has become the party of Putin.

Rupert, come get your orange boy, you petrified old dinosaur turd.

Good lord, these people are nuts.

Let there be snark.

When I decide to be condescending, you won’t have to dream up a fantasy about it.

Peak wingnut was a lie.

“I was told there would be no fact checking.”

The snowflake in chief appeared visibly frustrated when questioned by a reporter about egg prices.

She burned that motherfucker down, and I am so here for it. Thank you, Caroline Kennedy.

Trump should be leading, not lying.

With all due respect and assumptions of good faith, please fuck off into the sun.

People identifying as christian while ignoring christ and his teachings is a strange thing indeed.

When your entire life is steeped in white supremacy, equality feels like discrimination.

Wake up. Grow up. Get in the fight.

Mobile Menu

  • Seattle Meet-up Post
  • 2025 Activism
  • Targeted Political Fundraising
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • COVID-19
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • 2025 Activism
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • Targeted Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Anderson On Health Insurance / Medicare Advantage payment advantage: Leverage or avoidance?

Medicare Advantage payment advantage: Leverage or avoidance?

by David Anderson|  July 13, 20177:13 am| 11 Comments

This post is in: Anderson On Health Insurance

FacebookTweetEmail

This is a follow-up on a previous post regarding the difference in fees physicians get paid by Traditional Medicare (TM) and Medicare Advantage(MA). I am riffing on the JAMA paper by Erin Trish, Paul Ginsburg and Laura Gascue as they found that MA tended to pay lower effective rates than TM for common codes.

My question that has been slow roasting is whether or not this price differential is due to leverage of Medicare Advantage providers to steer their patients or avoidance of high cost providers. My intuition suggests both to some degree.

Leverage would be expressed by all providers that are participating in a Medicare Advantage network taking lower rates from the Medicare Advantage insurer than they take from Traditional Medicare. The principle mechanism of price reduction would be the credible threat that insurers would move a provide to either a lower tier on a multi-tier network or completely out of network so that the Medicare Advantage beneficiary faces prospectively higher cost sharing to go to that doctor.

Avoidance would be that the providers in the Medicare Advantage network are being paid their standard Traditional Medicare rates. Providers who for one reason or another have a higher base Traditional Medicare rate are dis proportionally excluded from the network.

The key test is how are providers with a high cost structure in Traditional Medicare treated. If they are taking a percentage hair cut but are in network, it is more of a Leverage story. If they are not in the network, it is more of an Avoidance story.

I am not sure what the policy implications of either answer would be; I am just really curious.

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « Thursday Morning Open Thread
Next Post: New information is all that matters »

Reader Interactions

11Comments

  1. 1.

    John Cole

    July 13, 2017 at 7:44 am

    tl;dr

    I slay myself.

  2. 2.

    dr. bloor

    July 13, 2017 at 7:44 am

    My guess would be leverage, such as it is; those pricing differentials aren’t that bad provided the Advantage patients don’t flood your practice. However, I would also guess that the Medicare Advantage patients are getting 3 AM appointment times for their CT scans.

  3. 3.

    satby

    July 13, 2017 at 7:55 am

    @John Cole: thought you were supposed to write this one?

  4. 4.

    HeleninEire

    July 13, 2017 at 7:59 am

    @John Cole: Get your own schtick, Cole.

  5. 5.

    pamelabrown53

    July 13, 2017 at 8:03 am

    @satby:
    Good morning! Is your reply indicative of an insider joke that is whizzing over my head?!

  6. 6.

    David Anderson

    July 13, 2017 at 8:58 am

    @pamelabrown53: John was complaining about his first comment on a music post being TLDR. So I asked him to write a risk adjustment post for me

  7. 7.

    satby

    July 13, 2017 at 9:19 am

    @dr. bloor: not really 3am but absurdly inconvenient times and long waits to get an appointment, you mean?

  8. 8.

    pamelabrown53

    July 13, 2017 at 10:28 am

    @David Anderson:
    Thanks David for both the reply and all the wonderful info you impart.

  9. 9.

    Another Scott

    July 13, 2017 at 12:32 pm

    Dead thread but…

    Sorry if I’m missing something obvious – wouldn’t be the first time. :-)

    The graph shows that MA pays about the same as TM for those particular codes. In addition, you tell us that MA pays less than TM for other particular codes.

    Since MA costs (somebody? Beuler?) more than TM – it has to, given TM’s extremely low overhead, right? – why in a rational system would we want MA? It’s not somehow applying the Secret Magic of the Marketplace Sauce to control costs (at least not according to the data above, as I understand it). It’s not raising payments to providers, and it costs enrollees more than TM (right?)

    The reduced payments to providers is would seemingly be used to fun[d] hookers-and-blow parties at the insurance companies with little benefit to the system as a whole. Of course, congresspeople who wrote the laws and their PACs get donations from the MA industry, so there’s that. But is there any other systemic benefit?

    I understand from your earlier post that MA is much more effective than it was when it was first created. It still seems like it can be too-easily gamed though to prevent people from getting the care they’re paying for.

    Thanks.

    Cheers,
    Scott.

  10. 10.

    arielibra

    July 13, 2017 at 2:47 pm

    a Leverage story

    The Price Differential Job was not one of my favorite episodes.

  11. 11.

    lahke

    July 13, 2017 at 5:58 pm

    Question: you are comparing MA to traditional Medicare in the narrative, but the chart is comparing MA to commercial rates, which tend to be higher than Medicare (which accords with the data shown). So are MA rates between commercial and traditional medicare, or even lower than traditional medicare?

Comments are closed.

Primary Sidebar

On The Road - dmkingto - SF Bay Area Scenes 3
Image by dmkingto (6/18/25)

Recent Comments

  • Steve LaBonne on Open Thread: Golden Words (Jun 18, 2025 @ 2:37pm)
  • Matt McIrvin on All the News That’s Fit To Print Open Thread (Jun 18, 2025 @ 2:36pm)
  • Baud on Open Thread: Golden Words (Jun 18, 2025 @ 2:34pm)
  • Baud on Open Thread: Golden Words (Jun 18, 2025 @ 2:34pm)
  • JaySinWa on Open Thread: Golden Words (Jun 18, 2025 @ 2:34pm)

Personality Crisis Podcast (Cole, DougJ, mistermix)

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
No Kings Protests June 14 2025

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)
Fix Nyms with Apostrophes

Social Media

Balloon Juice
WaterGirl
TaMara
John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
David Anderson
Major Major Major Major
DougJ NYT Pitchbot
mistermix

Keeping Track

Legal Challenges (Lawfare)
Republicans Fleeing Town Halls (TPM)
21 Letters (to Borrow or Steal)
Search Donations from a Brand

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2025 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!