• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

Come on, man.

Take your GOP plan out of the witness protection program.

Not all heroes wear capes.

Sitting here in limbo waiting for the dice to roll

American History and Black History Cannot Be Separated

The next time the wall street journal editorial board speaks the truth will be the first.

Their freedom requires your slavery.

Accused of treason; bitches about the ratings. I am in awe.

A sufficient plurality of insane, greedy people can tank any democratic system ever devised, apparently.

Whoever he was, that guy was nuts.

A democracy can’t function when people can’t distinguish facts from lies.

You don’t get to peddle hatred on saturday and offer condolences on sunday.

I’d hate to be the candidate who lost to this guy.

We still have time to mess this up!

The willow is too close to the house.

It’s easy to sit in safety and prescribe what other people should be doing.

Never entrust democracy to any process that requires republicans to act in good faith.

The revolution will be supervised.

It may be funny to you motherfucker, but it’s not funny to me.

They’re not red states to be hated; they are voter suppression states to be fixed.

Consistently wrong since 2002

Everybody saw this coming.

Since when do we limit our critiques to things we could do better ourselves?

This has so much WTF written all over it that it is hard to comprehend.

Mobile Menu

  • Winnable House Races
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • Balloon Juice 2023 Pet Calendar (coming soon)
  • COVID-19 Coronavirus
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • War in Ukraine
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • 2021-22 Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Politics / Trumpery / Russiagate / Trump Pursued A Russia Deal Up To January 2016

Trump Pursued A Russia Deal Up To January 2016

by Cheryl Rofer|  August 27, 201711:10 pm| 90 Comments

This post is in: Russiagate, All we want is life beyond the thunderdome

FacebookTweetEmail

Tonight’s Trump Dump is from the Washington Post:

While Donald Trump was running for president in late 2015 and early 2016, his company was pursuing a plan to develop a massive Trump Tower in Moscow, according to several people familiar with the proposal and new records reviewed by Trump Organization lawyers.

This is pretty significant. The cast of characters is familiar – Felix Sater and Trump lawyer Michael Cohen. As always, it’s not clear how involved Trump himself was. This was a time period when Trump was being particularly effusive to Vladimir Putin.

Andrew Weiss has some early observations in a thread starting with this tweet.

1/ Stunning: Trump failed to disclose a large pending deal in Moscow while he ran for White House via @CarolLeonnig https://t.co/ARkRb5dIAW

— Andrew S. Weiss (@andrewsweiss) August 28, 2017

Josh Marshall has been following Felix Sater’s role particularly closely and has a short piece up.

I may be able to provide more analysis tomorrow morning. I’m a morning person and, in any case, had a great day today including birds and conversations with interesting people. I’ll stick around for a little while on this thread and come back tomorrow morning.

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « Everything is Awful But You Can Help
Next Post: Late Night Horrorshow Open Thread: Adding Insults to Injuries »

Reader Interactions

90Comments

  1. 1.

    randy khan

    August 27, 2017 at 11:18 pm

    I mentioned this at LGM, too, but New York Magazine had a long take-out on Sater earlier this month:

    Sater-mania

    Sater, despite being a cooperating witness with the FBI, doesn’t seem to give much thought to following the law. Of course, he may see it as all transactional – if he knows enough he can get off, after all.

  2. 2.

    Cheryl Rofer

    August 27, 2017 at 11:18 pm

    Hm. WH referring questions about the Trump Tower Moscow deal to Michael Cohen's attorney.

    — Natasha Bertrand (@NatashaBertrand) August 28, 2017

  3. 3.

    Cheryl Rofer

    August 27, 2017 at 11:21 pm

    In a slightly different key, former Vice President Joe Biden says we are in a struggle for the soul of the nation. We keep being hit with extraordinary things, but for a former vice president to criticize a sitting president is highly unusual. The ante is being upped.

  4. 4.

    Another Scott

    August 27, 2017 at 11:21 pm

    This story is about the least surprising thing in the history of US politics. :-)

    Seriously, has Trump ever (in the last 10-15 years anyway) heaped praise on anyone except as a bargaining tool to get what he wants? Of course he wanted something from Putin and was willing to give away anything – including the US Government – to get it.

    Still, if it gets more attention among the people who don’t follow politics as closely as we do, then hooray!

    I hope Mueller finds much more though…

    Thanks.

    Cheers,
    Scott.

  5. 5.

    ruemara

    August 27, 2017 at 11:22 pm

    I just despise these craven, moronic assholes.

  6. 6.

    clay

    August 27, 2017 at 11:25 pm

    @Cheryl Rofer: Isn’t Michael Cohen Trump’s attorney? So, we’re supposed to ask Trump’s attorney’s attorney?

    Hmmm… not enough layers of lawyer yet. Call me when we get to Trump’s attorney’s attorney’s attorney’s attorney.

  7. 7.

    Wag

    August 27, 2017 at 11:27 pm

    @Another Scott:

    I hope Mueller finds much more though…

    As do we all. And I have little doubt that he will, and already has.

  8. 8.

    Wag

    August 27, 2017 at 11:28 pm

    @clay: It’ll be like peeling an onion. One stinking layer of lawyers after another.

  9. 9.

    PsiFighter37

    August 27, 2017 at 11:28 pm

    @Wag: Given the team of lawyers / prosecutors that Mueller has assembled, I think that Mueller is going to make Watergate look like child’s play once all is said and done.

  10. 10.

    Repatriated

    August 27, 2017 at 11:29 pm

    @clay:

    Hmmm… not enough layers of lawyer yet. Call me when we get to Trump’s attorney’s attorney’s attorney’s attorney.

    MAGA: My Attorney’s Got Attorneys.

  11. 11.

    Mnemosyne

    August 27, 2017 at 11:30 pm

    I suspect that the deal “fell through” because Putin had his eye on the bigger prize. If Hillary had managed to pull out the election after all, they’d be breaking ground on Trump Tower Moscow as we speak.

  12. 12.

    Cheryl Rofer

    August 27, 2017 at 11:30 pm

    @clay: Precisely

  13. 13.

    Wag

    August 27, 2017 at 11:33 pm

    @Repatriated: You win the internet tonight!

    @PsiFighter37:

    Without a doubt.

  14. 14.

    rikyrah

    August 27, 2017 at 11:34 pm

    @ruemara:
    I feel you

  15. 15.

    MomSense

    August 27, 2017 at 11:36 pm

    I just have this feeling that the rot goes deep in the Republican Party.

  16. 16.

    Mnemosyne

    August 27, 2017 at 11:42 pm

    @MomSense:

    People have been warning us since 2010 that Citizens United meant that foreign governments could donate unlimited funds to elections. We’re simply seeing the culmination of that process.

  17. 17.

    efgoldman

    August 27, 2017 at 11:44 pm

    Peach Pustule’s old man was a racist sleaze and a crook; like papa like son.
    Just beginning to explore the rotten underside of the iceberg.

  18. 18.

    Cheryl Rofer

    August 27, 2017 at 11:45 pm

    Headed to bed now. Looks like y’all are slowing down too. I’ll be back in the morning to check this thread.

  19. 19.

    sm*t cl*de

    August 27, 2017 at 11:45 pm

    @Cheryl Rofer:

    for a former vice president to criticize a sitting president is highly unusual

    Cheney set the New Norrmal.
    It is not yet normal for a sitting president to spend 2/3 of his time criticising the previous president, though.

  20. 20.

    Jim, Foolish Literalist

    August 27, 2017 at 11:46 pm

    @efgoldman: Peach Pustule’s old man was a racist sleaze and a crook; like papa like son.

    Except the old man was good at it. And never, AFAIK, wanted what trump wants most of all: Attention.

  21. 21.

    Repatriated

    August 27, 2017 at 11:47 pm

    @MomSense:

    I just have this feeling that the rot goes deep in the Republican Party.

    Wouldn’t be the first time. Remember the Rep. Mark Foley House Pages scandal?

  22. 22.

    Adam L Silverman

    August 27, 2017 at 11:47 pm

    @Another Scott: It is also a month old. TPM covered this in July.

    2/ There's a lot here. And as I explain, TPM reported this a month ago. Now however we know Michael Cohen was the Trump Org exec handling…

    — Josh Marshall (@joshtpm) August 28, 2017

    4/ Another point Thielman reported in July. Cohen and Sater didn't meet in the Trump org. They knew each other growing up. They both …

    — Josh Marshall (@joshtpm) August 28, 2017

    6/ As we've also reported, Cohen was brought into the Trump Org because Trump saw Cohen as a conduit for money coming out of the countries..

    — Josh Marshall (@joshtpm) August 28, 2017

    8/ But who knows. In any case, the two are a thread that strings through almost the entirety of the Russia story. https://t.co/R0Yvw0lkBP

    — Josh Marshall (@joshtpm) August 28, 2017

  23. 23.

    MomSense

    August 27, 2017 at 11:48 pm

    @Mnemosyne:

    Exactly. And I betcha the hack of the RNC and other GOP officials and members of Congress was a treasure trove of kompromat. That the Russians didnt go public with it means they have a lot of leverage.

    I hope it all comes out.

  24. 24.

    efgoldman

    August 27, 2017 at 11:49 pm

    @Jim, Foolish Literalist:

    Except the old man was good at it.

    So good at it, he went to the sneezer

  25. 25.

    PPCLI

    August 27, 2017 at 11:50 pm

    @Repatriated: MAAGA: My Attorney’s Attorneys Got Attorneys

    We’re going to need a bigger hat

  26. 26.

    Another Scott

    August 27, 2017 at 11:51 pm

    @PPCLI: rofl.

    Cheers,
    Scott.

  27. 27.

    patrick II

    August 27, 2017 at 11:52 pm

    @Mnemosyne:

    Alito sadly shakes his head no, not possible.

  28. 28.

    Millard Filmore

    August 27, 2017 at 11:52 pm

    @Mnemosyne:

    If Hillary had managed to pull out the election after all,

    The story since the Russian interference broke is that “at least they didn’t change any votes out of the polling stations”. Trump ran a really crap campaign. He insulted many groups, wasted many campaign days in all the wrong places, blew off any big data work, and his only policy was MAGA … essentially just loafed through the whole process. Yet he was supremely confident he would win, and it appears Putin was too.

    His two core groups were racists and evangelicals. That is not enough. Those were the types to always go Republican anyway. Where did they get the rest of the votes to win? I am starting to grow tinfoil on my head, thinking that Yes, the Russians DID mess with our vote count.

    I do not think Russian money flowing into the Republican Party would cause McConnell to blanch for half an hour in that Intelligence meeting way back when. It must be something else. I do not follow all the news but McConnell has not made any noise about the investigation that would irritate the IC, has he? Hasn’t all his activity been on domestic issues like the ACA and tax give aways to the rich?

    (made some cosmetic edits)

  29. 29.

    Repatriated

    August 27, 2017 at 11:55 pm

    @PPCLI: All hat, no caselaw.

    (My legalese-fu is weak — there has to be a better joke to be made there.)

  30. 30.

    GregB

    August 27, 2017 at 11:56 pm

    I am still waiting for Yakov Smirnov’s name to get wound into this ball of yarn.

    He’s the only Russian emigre left out of this clusterfuck so far.

  31. 31.

    Repatriated

    August 27, 2017 at 11:57 pm

    @GregB: In post-Soviet Russia, …

  32. 32.

    Another Scott

    August 27, 2017 at 11:59 pm

    @Adam L Silverman: Thanks. Trump and his minions are so transparent – “I want a big deal with Putin. Find me some good Russians to make it happen and pay them whatever they want!! Nobody will suspect a thing!!1”

    They’re like Kang and Kodos come to life….

    :-/

    Cheers,
    Scott.

  33. 33.

    Gian

    August 27, 2017 at 11:59 pm

    @Millard Filmore:

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/house-majority-leader-to-colleagues-in-2016-i-think-putin-pays-trump/2017/05/17/515f6f8a-3aff-11e7-8854-21f359183e8c_story.html?utm_term=.0723a03ecac1

    “There’s two people I think Putin pays: Rohrabacher and Trump,” McCarthy (R-Calif.) said, according to a recording of the June 15, 2016, exchange, which was listened to and verified by The Washington Post. Rep. Dana Rohrabacher is a Californian Republican known in Congress as a fervent defender of Putin and Russia.

  34. 34.

    Smitty

    August 28, 2017 at 12:00 am

    @Cheryl Rofer: This is not very surprising or complicated. If anyone is taken aback by the craven Trump shame on you. Trump knows that he is in this rumble (Sharks v Jets) until the finish. He is damaged and knows it but, street fighter that he is, continues to slash and kick as long as he can. No honor here, just survival. Today Trump has suggested that police departments need additional equipment denied them by the Obama administration…grenade launchers. flack vests, etc. Looks to me that he is recruiting troops for battle Trump. I am not surprised.. Are you?

  35. 35.

    Repatriated

    August 28, 2017 at 12:01 am

    @GregB: Why am I suddenly reminded of Andy Kaufman?

  36. 36.

    Millard Filmore

    August 28, 2017 at 12:03 am

    @Gian:

    “There’s two people I think Putin pays: Rohrabacher and Trump,”

    Yes, that quote has been here for a few months. (1) That is rather isolated from McConnell and the Republican Party as a whole. The damage would be limited. (2) Paying Trump should not result in a confident victory.

  37. 37.

    Another Scott

    August 28, 2017 at 12:07 am

    @Millard Filmore: Remember how Ryan shut it down in that conversation – (roughly) “No leaks. We’re family.” They all know, they all think it’s a big joke as long as they’re on top, and they all don’t care.

    Grr….

    Cheers,
    Scott.

  38. 38.

    Adam L Silverman

    August 28, 2017 at 12:08 am

    @Another Scott: Based on the NeverTrumper GOP insider RUMINT there is a bigger story that WaPo is sitting on, for the time being. The implication is that it is at the request of Mueller. As with all of this we will have to wait and see if/when it comes out.

    And it’s not that they’re transparent, it’s that they’ve been playing all sides in an attempt to keep cash flowing and themselves solvent for decades. This includes the FBI’s NY Field Office. Sater was an informant for them. And they covered for him. Wayne Barrett reported a long time ago that Giuliani covered for Trump in the late 80s/early 90s on money laundering allegations in exchange for Trump staking him a million dollars for his mayoral run and acting as his chief fundraising bundler as well. And there have been persistent rumors and allegations that the President was an informant for the NY Field Office as well.

    Finally, everyone in that family has an uncanny knack of finding criminals to do business with. It’s like a genetic predisposition or something.
    http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2017/08/27/ivanka-trump-business-partner-215544

  39. 39.

    Felonius Monk

    August 28, 2017 at 12:09 am

    @efgoldman:

    So good at it, he went to the sneezer

    Investigated by Congress, sued by the DOJ for discrimination, but AFAIK never incarcerated. Are you getting him mixed up with Kushner’s old man?

  40. 40.

    Ruckus

    August 28, 2017 at 12:11 am

    @Jim, Foolish Literalist:
    It may have been because of what we have as media now versus what we had back then but I don’t recall him wanting that much attention at all. I don’t think he wanted to be that well known, just wealthy and didn’t care how he got there. drumpf requires admiration far more than money. He likes money.

  41. 41.

    Millard Filmore

    August 28, 2017 at 12:12 am

    @Smitty:

    Looks to me that he is recruiting troops for battle Trump.

    If this little civil war turns hot, I expect the EU and every important trading partner outside of Russia’s influence to impose a trade and banking embargo on us. China will be first out the gate to exploit (peacefully if we are all lucky) this golden opportunity. Our economy will crash and in the chaos those rich enough, especially the RWNJ billionairs will load themselves down with as much wealth as they can carry as they bug out to an evil socialist European country.

  42. 42.

    Millard Filmore

    August 28, 2017 at 12:16 am

    @Another Scott: I agree they all know about Russian money in our political process. My tinfoil hat says very few know, unless the IC has informed them, that they also dinked our vote counts. I cannot think of any other scandal that would cause McConnell to blanch long enough for it to be seen after the meeting is over and he is out the door.

  43. 43.

    efgoldman

    August 28, 2017 at 12:18 am

    @Felonius Monk:

    Are you getting him mixed up with Kushner’s old man?

    Seen one racist asshole slumlord, you’ve seen ’em all.

  44. 44.

    Mnemosyne

    August 28, 2017 at 12:20 am

    @Ruckus:

    OT, but I bought a hat at the new REI in Burbank. I needed one with a strap on it so I won’t lose it out on the water. Hopefully it will cool off a bit by the time the tall ships festival rolls around.

  45. 45.

    Millard Filmore

    August 28, 2017 at 12:20 am

    My #41 is in moderation ??? Maybe the word s0cilist ???

    Oops, now its between #40 and #41

  46. 46.

    GregB

    August 28, 2017 at 12:21 am

    In post Soviet-Russia tapes pee-pee on you.

  47. 47.

    Adam L Silverman

    August 28, 2017 at 12:23 am

    @Millard Filmore: It’s free.

  48. 48.

    Felonius Monk

    August 28, 2017 at 12:24 am

    @efgoldman:

    Seen one racist asshole slumlord, you’ve seen ’em all.

    True ‘dat and then some. ;)

    How you feeling? Is the dialysis routine working out?

  49. 49.

    Another Scott

    August 28, 2017 at 12:25 am

    @Millard Filmore: Yup. In a recent update of FYWP “socialism” and related words that contain “cialis” became spam words again (after Adam removed them from the list earlier (IIRC)).

    Gotta be careful…

    (Note that I used empty bold and italic tags above to get past the spam filters here.)

    Cheers,
    Scott.

  50. 50.

    Felonius Monk

    August 28, 2017 at 12:27 am

    @Mnemosyne:

    so I won’t lose it out on the water.

    Lose what? The hat or your lunch?

    May we call you Midshipperson Mnem?

  51. 51.

    Another Scott

    August 28, 2017 at 12:28 am

    @Millard Filmore: Messing with the vote totals is very difficult because it is so decentralized. I still think that is unlikely, myself.

    But it is worrying…

    Cheers,
    Scott.

  52. 52.

    efgoldman

    August 28, 2017 at 12:29 am

    @Felonius Monk:

    Is the dialysis routine working out?

    Not improving as much as the medicos at the clinic would like, but slowly but surely….
    Starting PT tomorrow, get some strength back in my legs before a four year old urchin shows up at the end of September. Also going out to a nice anniversary dinner (p.a. and G&T probably know where).

  53. 53.

    Smitty

    August 28, 2017 at 12:29 am

    @Adam L Silverman: It’s the Trump family being known worldwide as marks. They always fall for 3 card monte.

  54. 54.

    Mrs. D. Ranged in AZ

    August 28, 2017 at 12:30 am

    @Adam L Silverman: it’s not a genetic predisposition so much as it is the Trump’s are fabulously wealthy idiots who leave chum in the water for sharks.

  55. 55.

    Adam L Silverman

    August 28, 2017 at 12:30 am

    @Another Scott: I’ll go back in tomorrow and do another scrub on the list.

  56. 56.

    Another Scott

    August 28, 2017 at 12:32 am

    @Adam L Silverman: Thank you, kind sir.

    Those dungeon words are especially hideous because (apparently) once they’ve been triggered, no amount of editing will fix the problem.

    ‘night all. Rest well. Be strong for the battles starting again on Monday.

    Cheers,
    Scott.

  57. 57.

    Adam L Silverman

    August 28, 2017 at 12:33 am

    @Another Scott: It isn’t the totals. If you hack the registration systems, especially in state’s that are looking to restrict the ability to vote, then you can manipulate the registrations forcing more of certain types of voters to use provisional ballots that are more likely to be invalidated. You also have the ability to use the info from the voter registration to engineer social media targeting of potential voters to manipulate them into not voting/staying home, depressing turnout, etc.

  58. 58.

    Felonius Monk

    August 28, 2017 at 12:35 am

    @efgoldman:

    Also going out to a nice anniversary dinner (p.a. and G&T probably know where).

    Physical therapy sounds like a good idea. I think it helps both mentally and physically. I hope you and Mrs efg enjoy the anniversary dinner.

    Last I saw something from G&T he was in the airport (Munich, I think) drinking beer. Has he surfaced stateside yet?

  59. 59.

    Ruckus

    August 28, 2017 at 12:38 am

    @Mnemosyne:
    I hope it cools a bit, I don’t do well in high heat anymore. So of course I live in southern CA. But it is at the ocean so I’d bet it will be a lot cooler than in the valleys. And I already have a hat that keeps the sun off of my shinny dome and it has a strap!. I also bought some suntan lotion. We all need sunlight, just not too much.

  60. 60.

    Mnemosyne

    August 28, 2017 at 12:38 am

    @Felonius Monk:

    Oh, I’m resigned to losing my lunch. I hope I won’t, and I bought some Seabands and non-drowsy motion sickness stuff that NotMax recommended to try and prevent it, but I figure I should just go in on the assumption that I’ll get sick and deal with it. I’d rather prepare for the worst than be surprised by a bad reaction.

    I will mostly likely sit in my seat with my hands folded (if I’m not hanging off the side, that is). I’m kind of a klutz and don’t want to accidentally damage the official tall ship of the state of California. Or myself, for that matter.

  61. 61.

    GregB

    August 28, 2017 at 12:38 am

    You also don’t need to hack millions of votes in 50 states. Under 100,00 in three states seems to have made the difference.

    Michigan, Wisconsin and Pennsylvania are where active rat fucking occurred.

    I am convinced.

  62. 62.

    Ruckus

    August 28, 2017 at 12:41 am

    @Another Scott:
    They didn’t need to mess with all of the totals, just a few states were necessary. If they picked right, or paid right that could have been more than enough.

  63. 63.

    Mnemosyne

    August 28, 2017 at 12:42 am

    @Ruckus:

    I was telling my BFF last night that we’re going and it turns out that her younger girl did a program at the Ocean Institute where middle-schoolers spend the night on a docked ship. The kid pulled the midnight-to-2 am watch and, sure enough, they came and rousted her out of bed for it. In the pouring rain. ? But she got through it just fine, though I don’t think she aspires to become a sailor.

  64. 64.

    Millard Filmore

    August 28, 2017 at 12:42 am

    @Adam L Silverman:

    It isn’t the totals. If you hack the registration systems,

    I am paranoid and always open to a good conspiracy theory. I have confidence that, along with all the other rat-fucking, your description of events happened. It would be damaging for 1 or 2 election cycles. I don’t see it giving McConnell a 30 minute blanch. The tinfoil that is replacing my receding hairline says there must be something else very much worse.

    (add) And that blanch means that it, whatever IT was, was a surprise when McConnell learned of it. It would not be a party wide operation.

  65. 65.

    Felonius Monk

    August 28, 2017 at 12:47 am

    @Mnemosyne: Bon voyage. When do you set sail?

  66. 66.

    Ruckus

    August 28, 2017 at 12:49 am

    @Mnemosyne:
    Bring saltines. An empty stomach is the worst, I’ve been told. Also saltines were what we had in the navy for it and either it worked or I’m fairly immune to seasickness. Possibly both as I’ve owned a 30 ft sailboat and raced on other sailboats in the open ocean.

  67. 67.

    Repatriated

    August 28, 2017 at 12:49 am

    @Mnemosyne: One thing that helps with seasickness is to watch the horizon, not the deck and bulkheads.

    If your brain knows it’s just the ship pitching and rolling, rather than the whole world doing so, it’s easier to avoid nausea.

  68. 68.

    Thru the Looking Glass...

    August 28, 2017 at 12:55 am

    Seriously, has Trump ever (in the last 10-15 years anyway) heaped praise on anyone except as a bargaining tool to get what he wants Putin?

    There… it seems like that’s what you were reaching for, so I just wanted to help you get there…

  69. 69.

    Ruckus

    August 28, 2017 at 12:56 am

    @Mnemosyne:
    One thing about current navy ships (and ones going back several decades) is that there isn’t much hanging about outside when it’s raining or under way in seas that are very heavy at all. Well except for plane duty behind aircraft carriers or underway refueling. But there are limits to that as well. Not if it’s just fucking cold though. Ask me later how I know that. Sailboats didn’t/don’t have that luxury.

  70. 70.

    Ruckus

    August 28, 2017 at 1:02 am

    @Repatriated:
    Good tip, I’d forgotten that. Of course most of the time under way I was somewhere inside and couldn’t see the horizon. Or I was on the bridge to see what was what and the horizon was not really visible as any sort of a level line, it was moving all over the place more than we were.
    But we won’t have that on this trip as we stay relatively close in shore and it’s very rare that there is much of a sea running at this time of year in the area we will be at.

  71. 71.

    Ruckus

    August 28, 2017 at 1:04 am

    @Felonius Monk:
    12 days. Dana Point harbor.

  72. 72.

    Frankensteinbeck

    August 28, 2017 at 1:05 am

    @Smitty:
    Trump is not a street fighter. He is an utter, abject coward not willing to look the people he fires in the face. Just imagine what a pathetic lack of willpower that takes. He is also not arming the police for combat. He is just reversing an Obama rule, with an extra nudge nudge wink wink to racist police officers that the DoJ will not investigate any police brutality against minorities.

  73. 73.

    Repatriated

    August 28, 2017 at 1:05 am

    @Repatriated: Or, alternatively, stand up and close your eyes.

    It’s the conflict between what your sense of balance is telling you is up/down and what your eyes are telling you.

    Your body interprets that disorientation as a symptom of poisoning, and reacts accordingly (get rid of whatever you just ate, promptly).

  74. 74.

    Seth Owen

    August 28, 2017 at 1:08 am

    I’m not much into either tin foil hats or CTs myself, but the more this nightmare continues the more I start having nagging doubts. The Trump victory was just so freaking weird. I mean, I know about all the flaws of the EC and all, but we’ve never had such a disproportionate outcome. Clinton beat him by what, 2 percent?

    A few months ago the Palmer Report guy did a piece pointing out all the weirdness. He admitted he had no proof, just a lot of weird coincidences with the polling and how Trump just barely won by just barely enough in just the right places to pull it off. Somebody said once ‘I believe in coincidences, I just don’t trust them.’

    Someone noted that this is bigger then Watergate. I think this is one of the biggest scandals in US history, if not the biggest. It’s one of the biggest crisis we have ever faced. This is Fort Sumter, Pearl Harbor, 9/11 big.

    Adam is best placed to comment on this, but he’s pretty careful about speculation. I’m just some dude, so I’ll say it. The Intelligence Community may have deeply disturbing evidence. It may be evidence that any reasonable person would find damning. But with Trumpists we are not dealing with reasonable people. And the nature of IC products are that they are very unlikely to be beyond-a-reasonable-doubt level of proof, which would be what is needed in our polarized situation. We got folks who hate liberals so much that they are willing to make excuses for fucking Nazis. They aren’t going to be swayed by evidence from the IC, who they don’t trust.

    It may be possible to bring Trump down through financial crimes. Much easier to prove and it doesn’t implicate IC sources and methods. But the REAL story may be that the Russians pulled off a huge coup. I think they needed a lot of help and fortuitous circumstances but I am no longer confident they didn’t take advantage of an opportunity to give things a nudge.

    I keep hearing that our voting system is too decentralized and chaotic for widespread manipulation. But that wouldn’t be required here. The whole difference was what, 70,000 votes or so? All the power that be claim there is no evidence actual vote totals were changed. Has anybody really looked? Is it even possible to look?

    I think it was Stalin who said it doesn’t matter who votes, it matters who counts the votes. The Russians know a thing or two on the subject, it appears.

    I’m not ready to go completely CT on this. We don’t have direct evidence — just a bunch of unusual coincidences. Short of some Russian spy defecting or NSA intercepts I am not sure that any definitive proof is even possible.

    But I’m willing to entertain the notion.

  75. 75.

    Repatriated

    August 28, 2017 at 1:09 am

    @Ruckus: Getting one’s “sea legs” is about developing the knack of trusting your sense of balance over visual orientation cues, I think. That and knowing where the handholds are…

  76. 76.

    Millard Filmore

    August 28, 2017 at 1:16 am

    @Seth Owen:

    And the nature of IC products are that they are very unlikely to be beyond-a-reasonable-doubt level of proof,

    And yet, McConnell’s blanch was deep enough to last through the meeting and out into the public corridors. That is the part that troubles me the most. Financial mischief is survivable. Something the IC has that has not come out yet is fatal.

  77. 77.

    West of the Rockies (been a while)

    August 28, 2017 at 1:22 am

    @Mnemosyne:

    Have breakfast, but nothing greasy. If someone near you begins to hurl, look away — it’s contagious.

  78. 78.

    Thru the Looking Glass...

    August 28, 2017 at 1:23 am

    @Seth Owen:

    It may be possible to bring Trump down through financial crimes. Much easier to prove and it doesn’t implicate IC sources and methods.

    Financial crimes? It certainly seems that way to me… and if the State of NY nails him, or one of his inner circle, it’s my understanding that he can’t pardon them for STATE crimes… one can only dream…

  79. 79.

    Ruckus

    August 28, 2017 at 1:31 am

    @Repatriated:
    LOL.
    I see that you’ve been on the water a bit.

  80. 80.

    Repatriated

    August 28, 2017 at 1:37 am

    @Ruckus: Not as much as you’d think, but enough to figure it out. :)

    Years of motorcycle riding helped, too.

  81. 81.

    Trabb's Boy

    August 28, 2017 at 1:38 am

    @Repatriated:
    All hat and no briefs, of course!

  82. 82.

    Repatriated

    August 28, 2017 at 1:49 am

    @Trabb’s Boy: Good call!

  83. 83.

    Mnemosyne

    August 28, 2017 at 1:54 am

    @West of the Rockies (been a while):

    I’m remembering the one (so far) time I went whale watching and ended up laying with my head on a table in the cabin along with the other miserable people, which is why I’m so nervous. But I think that happened partly because I lost my sunglasses about an hour into the cruise and I get light-triggered migraines, so it was a one-two whammy of rough seas and a migraine. That’s why I also bought a sunglass leash today, and I may wear my backup sunglasses on the actual ship, just in case.

    And yet I had a great time on the whale watching cruise up until I started vomiting, so it wasn’t a total loss. Except of breakfast. ?

  84. 84.

    The Lodger

    August 28, 2017 at 1:54 am

    @Seth Owen: Wisconsin had 200,000 voters thrown off the rolls. Michigan had markedly fewer voting machines in a lot of Democratic precincts. Pennsylvania is legendary for conducting dubious elections, D counties shade their results toward Ds, R counties do it for Rs. It usually balances out, more or less, but not this time.
    [email protected] is going into a lot more detail than he usually does about how things went off the rails in this election, and he’s always been careful bout what he says. Pay attention to what he’s saying now.

  85. 85.

    Mnemosyne

    August 28, 2017 at 2:01 am

    @Adam L Silverman:

    This includes the FBI’s NY Field Office. Sater was an informant for them. And they covered for him.

    And yet another commenter here (can’t remember who) was trying to tell me that the FBI had solved their Whitey Bulger problem and it couldn’t possibly happen again, especially not in New York. ?

  86. 86.

    Ruckus

    August 28, 2017 at 2:39 am

    @Repatriated:

    Years of motorcycle riding helped, too.

    I feel the same for me. I also road raced motorcycles. It does focus the mind doesn’t it?

  87. 87.

    Kristine

    August 28, 2017 at 7:19 am

    @GregB: I don’t believe the Russians needed to be involved in vote fraud/suppression. The GOP would’ve been happy to handle that by themselves.

  88. 88.

    Cheryl Rofer

    August 28, 2017 at 8:16 am

    @Adam L Silverman: Thanks, Adam. This is one of the reasons I’ve given up trying to figure out the microscopic detail of the Trump story. Marshall’s tweets don’t provide the same level of detail that the WaPo story does. He has, however, written longer pieces on Sater.

    I do try to pick up on the larger pieces of the story, though, and if indeed Marshall provided the same story in those longer pieces, he must have buried the lede – that Trump was still trying to do a deal in Moscow even as he was campaigning.

    I think that Marshall’s commentary is better than much on the Russian connections, but the way the articles are written makes it very, very hard to tell what is new. Did WaPo bring new detail into what Marshall reported? If I were totally following the story at full detail, that’s what I’d like to know. The only way to know that is to put the two articles side by side and compare every sentence. Much of what is in every news article on this subject is backstory. Most readers aren’t even following at the level I am, so at least a couple of paragraphs of backstory must be included; sometimes it’s half the article. There’s a bunch of it in the WaPo article, although I haven’t read it closely enough to estimate the percentage. Sometimes, sneakily, reporters toss in something new among the backstory. Or, worse, they leave something out that seems to me is important. Even if I pull out all the details, we still don’t know which ones are important and which aren’t.

    A positive (so far) aspect of multiple reporters’ styling is that, because there is not yet an established storyline, they often put the facts together differently, which can lead to new insights. The downside of that is that different reporters’ versions of the same story may look different.

    Comparing Marshall’s story and the WaPo story will take at least an hour. It’s not a priority for me today. Sater seems to be a major Russian connection. He’s the one the reporters are following now.

  89. 89.

    Tokyokie

    August 28, 2017 at 10:02 am

    @GregB: My theory (in addition to the voter roll manipulation and vote caging that Russian hacking enabled) is that Russian hackers attempted to breach elections systems across those three states to determine which counties’ systems were the most vulnerable, and armed with that knowledge, Cambridge Analytica polled the shit out of those counties to determine how many votes they could change in each precinct without drawing attention to their project. Switching say, 2% of votes in precincts covering 200,000 voters in each of those states gets you close to or beyond der Trumpenführer’s margin of victory. (And I still wonder whether the computer crash that affected voting in Detroit and probably cost Clinton the state could have been the work of the Russians.)

  90. 90.

    Betty

    August 28, 2017 at 10:29 am

    And yet a Facebook “friend” just re-posted a Hillary should be locked up story this morning. Ay yie yie!

Comments are closed.

Primary Sidebar

Fundraising 2023-24

Wis*Dems Supreme Court + SD-8

Recent Comments

  • Major Major Major Major on Late Night Open Thread: Taxing Prep (Mar 28, 2023 @ 2:17am)
  • Goku (aka Amerikan Baka) on Late Night Open Thread: Taxing Prep (Mar 28, 2023 @ 2:10am)
  • Goku (aka Amerikan Baka) on Late Night Open Thread: Taxing Prep (Mar 28, 2023 @ 2:10am)
  • piratedan on Late Night Open Thread: Taxing Prep (Mar 28, 2023 @ 1:51am)
  • Major Major Major Major on Late Night Open Thread: Taxing Prep (Mar 28, 2023 @ 1:46am)

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
We All Need A Little Kindness
Classified Documents: A Primer
State & Local Elections Discussion

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Mailing List Signup
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)

Twitter / Spoutible

Balloon Juice (Spoutible)
WaterGirl (Spoutible)
TaMara (Spoutible)
John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
TaMara
David Anderson
Major Major Major Major
ActualCitizensUnited

Join the Fight!

Join the Fight Signup Form
All Join the Fight Posts

Balloon Juice Events

5/14  The Apocalypse
5/20  Home Away from Home
5/29  We’re Back, Baby
7/21  Merging!

Balloon Juice for Ukraine

Donate

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2023 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!