• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

Republicans are radicals, not conservatives.

Pessimism assures that nothing of any importance will change.

Our job is not to persuade republicans but to defeat them.

Shallow, uninformed, and lacking identity

Let’s not be the monsters we hate.

Damn right I heard that as a threat.

Within six months Twitter will be fully self-driving.

… pundit janitors mopping up after the GOP

Is it negotiation when the other party actually wants to shoot the hostage?

Meanwhile over at truth Social, the former president is busy confessing to crimes.

A sufficient plurality of insane, greedy people can tank any democratic system ever devised, apparently.

“woke” is the new caravan.

Republicans are the party of chaos and catastrophe.

Nancy smash is sick of your bullshit.

Consistently wrong since 2002

It may be funny to you motherfucker, but it’s not funny to me.

Reality always lies in wait for … Democrats.

Republicans do not pay their debts.

Usually wrong but never in doubt

Hot air and ill-informed banter

I didn’t have alien invasion on my 2023 BINGO card.

When your entire life is steeped in white supremacy, equality feels like discrimination.

Incompetence, fear, or corruption? why not all three?

A last alliance of elves and men. also pet photos.

Mobile Menu

  • Winnable House Races
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • Balloon Juice 2023 Pet Calendar (coming soon)
  • COVID-19 Coronavirus
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • War in Ukraine
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • 2021-22 Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Anderson On Health Insurance / What insurers want CSR funded?

What insurers want CSR funded?

by David Anderson|  February 8, 201811:18 am| 9 Comments

This post is in: Anderson On Health Insurance

FacebookTweetEmail

Earlier this week, the Hill reported that the Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association wanted Congress to appropriate funding for Cost Sharing Reduction (CSR) subsidies:

A leading health insurance group said Monday there is an “urgent” need for Congress to act to stabilize ObamaCare markets after the repeal of the individual mandate in December.

“There’s an urgent need to stabilize the market,” Justine Handelman, a senior vice president at the Blue Cross Blue Shield Association, told reporters at a briefing.

They argue that this will lead to lower non-subsidized Silver premiums and that is a desirable policy goal. In isolation, I agree. In general, I strongly disagree.

Most states loaded the cost of CSR into their Silver plans. A large number of states, most notably California and Pennsylvania loaded the cost of CSR into only their on-Exchange Silver plans while off-Exchange Silvers were sold at “normal” rates. Going forward, more states and more insurers are planning to engage in Silver Loading with the Off-Exchange Switcheroo option.

There is a good technical argument for the Blues. From 2014 to September 2017, CSR funding was tied to actual claims experience. Building estimated CSR costs into premiums introduces another source of variance. Variance can be dealt with but it is another source of potential error in correctly setting premiums.

I think there is a slightly more cynical reason to suspect why the Blues may want CSR appropriated. When states adopted Silver Loading strategies, the relative spread between the Benchmark Silver and other metal bands changed. Bronze plans became much cheaper for subsidized buyers and Gold plans either became less expensive than Silver Benchmark plans in 20% of the Healthcare.gov counties or far more cost competitive Gold offerings.

In regions where there is only a single insurer, this is irrelevant. However in regions where there is both a high cost insurer and a low premium insurer, introducing Silver Loading makes the low cost insurers’ subsidized products far more appealing on a relative basis than the were before. Reducing the Silver Benchmark by 10% to 15% reduces the premium spreads and makes high cost insurer products more attractive.

Re-instituting CSR means the pricing and risk adjustment advantage enjoyed by Medicaid-like carriers decreases. It could be that the Blues are trying to protect themselves from competition.

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « I think you make yourself a victim almost every single day
Next Post: Someday Everything is Gonna Be Smooth Like a Rhapsody »

Reader Interactions

9Comments

  1. 1.

    MomSense

    February 8, 2018 at 11:41 am

    With the caveat about anecdata, I am paying twice as much for a bronze as I did last year for a cost-sharing silver. The same is true for my oldest kid and all of my exchange friends. It wasn’t just Anthem. The co-op and all the other insurers did the same.

  2. 2.

    ProfDamatu

    February 8, 2018 at 11:52 am

    It would be interesting to see what would happen here if CSR was restored. I’m in Virginia, where the majority of counties have only one insurer on the exchange and, at least in the Optima counties, there appears to have been minimal if any Silver loading (premiums for all metal levels at least doubled from 2017 – Gold actually being the worst; I got quoted over $1200/mo as a 42 year old non-smoker). Theoretically premiums should come down in single-insurer counties, but given the overall behavior of the industry I’m skeptical that the reductions would be meaningful. In any event, it’s hard for me to really enthusiastically cheer for something happening that might benefit people here when it’s likely to hurt many of the people who benefited from the Silver loading strategy.

  3. 3.

    Brachiator

    February 8, 2018 at 12:39 pm

    Re-instituting CSR means the pricing and risk adjustment advantage enjoyed by Medicaid-like carriers decreases. It could be that the Blues are trying to protect themselves from competition.

    So what happens if Congress does nothing, that is, they let the individual mandate stand and do nothing else? By the way, I am thinking that this would be the minimum reaction even if the Democrats retake the House, but not the Senate.

  4. 4.

    Kelly

    February 8, 2018 at 12:49 pm

    For us on the Exchange in Oregon the Silver loading CSR response saved us a tidy sum. Our big loss from the Repubs cheating on CSR and risk corridor payment promises is the loss of insurers. Our choices went from around 10 to 3. The most innovative and customer friendly outfits counted on the risk corridor payments cover better service and had the scaffolding knocked out from under them.

    off topic but a great story on why we need Obamacare.
    https://splinternews.com/how-to-not-die-in-america-1822555151

  5. 5.

    Sab

    February 8, 2018 at 2:13 pm

    @Kelly: Thanks for linking to that story. There are lots of stories out there like it, but it is particularly well done.

  6. 6.

    please help

    February 8, 2018 at 4:37 pm

    Can someone dumb it down even more for me? Still not totally getting it.

  7. 7.

    David Anderson

    February 8, 2018 at 4:43 pm

    @please help:

    Funding CSR probably helps high cost insurers’ bottom lines

  8. 8.

    please help

    February 8, 2018 at 4:51 pm

    @David Anderson: yes, but how exactly? Are they the high premium insurer you’re referring to in “Reducing the Silver Benchmark by 10% to 15% reduces the premium spreads and makes high cost insurer products more attractive.”

  9. 9.

    David Anderson

    February 8, 2018 at 5:14 pm

    @please help: yes

Comments are closed.

Primary Sidebar

Fundraising 2023-24

Wis*Dems Supreme Court + SD-8

Recent Comments

  • Geminid on Medium Cool – Agatha Christie & Dorothy Sayers, Part III (Mar 26, 2023 @ 8:45pm)
  • SiubhanDuinne on Medium Cool – Agatha Christie & Dorothy Sayers, Part III (Mar 26, 2023 @ 8:45pm)
  • Andrya on Medium Cool – Agatha Christie & Dorothy Sayers, Part III (Mar 26, 2023 @ 8:40pm)
  • RaflW on Sunday Evening Open Thread: The GOP, Now A Full-Scale Mafia (Mar 26, 2023 @ 8:38pm)
  • Steeplejack on Medium Cool – Agatha Christie & Dorothy Sayers, Part III (Mar 26, 2023 @ 8:38pm)

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
We All Need A Little Kindness
Classified Documents: A Primer
State & Local Elections Discussion

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Mailing List Signup
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)

Twitter / Spoutible

Balloon Juice (Spoutible)
WaterGirl (Spoutible)
TaMara (Spoutible)
John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
TaMara
David Anderson
Major Major Major Major
ActualCitizensUnited

Join the Fight!

Join the Fight Signup Form
All Join the Fight Posts

Balloon Juice Events

5/14  The Apocalypse
5/20  Home Away from Home
5/29  We’re Back, Baby
7/21  Merging!

Balloon Juice for Ukraine

Donate

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2023 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!