• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

Some judge needs to shut this circus down soon.

A lot of Dems talk about what the media tells them to talk about. Not helpful.

A democracy can’t function when people can’t distinguish facts from lies.

Come on, media. you have one job. start doing it.

I did not have this on my fuck 2022 bingo card.

Is it negotiation when the other party actually wants to shoot the hostage?

They’re not red states to be hated; they are voter suppression states to be fixed.

Usually wrong but never in doubt

Just because you believe it, that doesn’t make it true.

if you can’t see it, then you are useless in the fight to stop it.

This really is a full service blog.

The poor and middle-class pay taxes, the rich pay accountants, the wealthy pay politicians.

Whatever happens next week, the fight doesn’t end.

A last alliance of elves and men. also pet photos.

This blog will pay for itself.

Teach a man to fish, and he’ll sit in a boat all day drinking beer.

They fucked up the fucking up of the fuckup!

I know this must be bad for Joe Biden, I just don’t know how.

Let us savor the impending downfall of lawless scoundrels who richly deserve the trouble barreling their way.

You can’t love your country only when you win.

Good lord, these people are nuts.

Motto for the House: Flip 5 and lose none.

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

I really should read my own blog.

Mobile Menu

  • Winnable House Races
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • Balloon Juice 2023 Pet Calendar (coming soon)
  • COVID-19 Coronavirus
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • War in Ukraine
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • 2021-22 Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Science & Technology / Rofer on Nuclear Issues / Levels of Deterrence

Levels of Deterrence

by Cheryl Rofer|  February 26, 20183:18 pm| 118 Comments

This post is in: Rofer on Nuclear Issues, Into the weeds

FacebookTweetEmail

The 2018 Nuclear Posture Review (NPR) mentions some variant of “deter” 279 times. Deterrence is supposedly what today’s nuclear arsenals are about. The idea is that we have enough nuclear weapons so that if an enemy attacked us, we could still destroy them. That standoff, established after the nearly world-ending Cuban Missile Crisis, seems to have worked. Or it’s possible that the reason for no nuclear war in the past 56 years is that nations recognize that destroying the world is in nobody’s interests.

The NPR argues that deterrence requires several new nuclear weapons. What can be confusing about discussions of deterrence is that they take place on several levels. The broadest is that the point of deterrence is to avoid a nuclear war. With a little more detail, we can talk about conventional weapons and nuclear weapons, and the generalities of what it takes to extend American nuclear deterrence to our allies. The deterrence theorists get far down in the weeds of pitting one particular weapon against another. For a reality check, those levels need to be cross-correlated.

If we don’t want a nuclear war, there are a number of things we can do. Eliminating nuclear weapons is one. That would require setting up a strategy to get there and a complicated series of negotiations. I think it could be done, but the Trump administration wouldn’t be able to do it.

Another way to defend against nuclear war would be to convene negotiations to agree on conventions for when the use of nuclear weapons might be appropriate. Limiting or banning various types of delivery vehicles might also be a subject of talks. Making more information available about plans for their use would also be helpful. Information is a key to stabilizing the world against nuclear weapons.

Much of the discussion in the NPR and in discussions I’m seeing on Twitter is at the most detailed level. Here’s one example, from page 7 of the NPR.

While nuclear weapons play a deterrent role in both Russian and Chinese strategy, Russia may also rely on threats of limited nuclear first use, or actual first use, to coerce us, our allies, and partners into terminating a conflict on terms favorable to Russia. Moscow apparently believes that the United States is unwilling to respond to Russian employment of tactical nuclear weapons with strategic nuclear weapons.

This has been called the escalate-to-deescalate strategy. The idea is that Russia would use a small nuclear weapon on an aircraft carrier group or a city like Warsaw or Tallinn. That would prove that they are serious about using nuclear weapons, the United States would shy away from a nuclear response, and Russia would gain an advantage.

The situation that this applies to is where war is in progress between the United States and Russia, and Russia fears losing. So it is some distance down the escalation trail. There are other assumptions that I’ll skip over to focus on why some analysts believe that this is what Russia would do.

Strategists on both sides infer doctrines and intentions from the other’s words and actions. Although some strategies are explicit, others are not. Deterrence is bolstered by clear statements of the retaliation certain actions will bring, but keeping the other side guessing has its own benefits.

Olga Oliker and Andrey Baklitskiy explain how some US analysts have inferred the escalate-to-deescalate strategy. A combination of a paper in a 1999 Russian military journal, particular interpretations of military exercises, Russia’s larger number of nonstrategic nuclear weapons, and Vladimir Putin’s rhetoric lead those analysts to conclude that Russia would use such a strategy. However, the official doctrine does not mention such a strategy, and the other evidence can be interpreted against its existence.

Bruno Tertrais also examines the evidence and comes up with the same conclusion: That the escalate-to-deescalate strategy is not part of Russia’s nuclear doctrine.

But the authors of the NPR believe that it is and that they know the way to counter it. From page 31,

To correct any Russian misperceptions of advantage and credibly deter Russian nuclear or non-nuclear strategic attacks—which could now include attacks against U.S. NC3 [Nuclear Command, Control, and Communications]—the President must have a range of limited and graduated options, including a variety of delivery systems and explosive yields.

And thus (page 55)

DoD and NNSA will develop for deployment a low-yield SLBM warhead to ensure a prompt response option that is able to penetrate adversary defenses.

This option presents a number of problems of its own. For example, once a nuclear exchange starts, it is not clear whether the two sides will distinguish between strikes with lower or higher yields. But those problems are not considered in the NPR.

Let’s move the focus out. We already have flexibility in the yields of existing nuclear weapons. Overall conventional and nuclear deterrence is strong. A new capability is likely to provoke Russia and possibly China to develop new weapons of their own.

Deterrence cannot be numerically measured. Russia has more nonstrategic nuclear weapons, but we have more weapons in storage. The differences come about because of differences in our situations and the history of developing the nuclear arsenals. Russia feels it needs those weapons to defend near its long continental borders; we have weaknesses in our production complex.

There are other similar issues in the NPR. The calculus of deterrence is subjective and can be bent to justify new weapons. Little is said in the document about the arms control agreements that limit the numbers and types of weapons. The likely Russian violation of the Intermediate Nuclear Forces Treaty is met with a proposal for an equally violating American weapon to be developed.

The comparisons are not only of one weapon to another. Nor should all the arguments be of adding or subtracting particular weapons; a broader perspective is needed.  That is simply a response to the other side and lacks leadership, either for stronger deterrence or moving away from nuclear weapons. It is a recipe for an arms race and escalation to full nuclear war if armed conflict occurs.

 

Graphic source. The cartoon is in homage to an earlier one of John Kennedy and Nikita Khrushchev.

Cross-posted at Nuclear Diner.

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « That’s What I’d Say I’d Tell You Everything
Next Post: Open Thread: On the Lighter (Than Air) Side… »

Reader Interactions

118Comments

  1. 1.

    Tom Levenson

    February 26, 2018 at 3:29 pm

    Nuclear strategy is not for amateurs. The Trump administration gives amateurs a bad name. WASF

    QED

  2. 2.

    Corner Stone

    February 26, 2018 at 3:30 pm

    Another way to defend against nuclear war would be to convene negotiations to agree on conventions for when the use of nuclear weapons might be appropriate.

    If we’re trying to determine yields of weapon(s) used, isn’t it too late to be checking a policy guideline?
    And for this:

    This has been called the escalate-to-deescalate strategy.

    This is an actual strategy? I have to admit it has left me confused.

  3. 3.

    The Moar You Know

    February 26, 2018 at 3:32 pm

    There is no American deterrence WRT to Russia these days, as Trump would never respond in kind unless they actually attack the US mainland, which will not happen.

    There are other nuclear powers out there, though. Hope Vlad’s thought that through.

  4. 4.

    Tom

    February 26, 2018 at 3:33 pm

    @Tom Levenson: I would have said “Is an insult to amateurs everywhere.”

  5. 5.

    trollhattan

    February 26, 2018 at 3:37 pm

    DoD and NNSA will develop for deployment a low-yield SLBM warhead to ensure a prompt response option that is able to penetrate adversary defenses.

    This scares the utter crap out of me. Remember when Trump had us drop the MOAB in the caveman part of Afghanistan? He’d be just as tempted to fling a baby nuke.

  6. 6.

    Mnemosyne

    February 26, 2018 at 3:37 pm

    Given that Russia is willing to violate international law by doing stuff like bombing maternity hospitals in Syria, I can see why the US would need to assume that Russia might blackmail us by nuking smaller areas and threatening to escalate further if we retaliate. There really are no good options if they get desperate enough to do that.

  7. 7.

    Cheryl Rofer

    February 26, 2018 at 3:37 pm

    @Corner Stone: That’s part of my point. Russia has not declared it as a strategy, but some American analysts think that is what they would do. The people who wrote the NPR believe it, or at least want to use it as justification for some new toys.

    The idea is that Russia would detonate a small nuke to show that it’s really serious, and the United States would be scared off. The argument for the new nukes is that then we wouldn’t be scared off and would detonate a little one of our own on, say, Rostov, and then Russia would be scared off.

    I leave the rest to your imagination.

  8. 8.

    Steeplejack

    February 26, 2018 at 3:38 pm

    I know I want the author of The Art of the Deal handling this complicated shit for me!

  9. 9.

    Brachiator

    February 26, 2018 at 3:43 pm

    This is insane on so many levels. What is mentioned here appears to assume that the US and Russia are the only nations at war. Are there similar analyses for US v China and Russia v China? How about India v Pakistan or US v Pakistan?

    Also, destroying an entire carrier group would seem to be a major tactical action, that would happen in a serious war. Would a response really be limited and measured?

    Also, this all reminds me of an odd little news item.

    One of the United States’ most advanced nuclear submarines returned to port in Washington state this week flying a Jolly Roger, a move steeped in maritime lore and mystery.

    The images of the USS Jimmy Carter, a Seawolf-class nuclear-powered submarine passing through the Hood Canal, were posted to a Pentagon media site and Twitter page. They show the skull and bones flying beside the American flag, the Washington Post reported.

    Are new weapons being developed and tested?

  10. 10.

    Corner Stone

    February 26, 2018 at 3:47 pm

    @Cheryl Rofer: Well then I am glad I was confused. As it is bugfuck crazy.

  11. 11.

    Another Scott

    February 26, 2018 at 3:48 pm

    The idea is that Russia would use a small nuclear weapon on an aircraft carrier group or a city like Warsaw or Tallinn.

    If war with Russia every got that bad – bad enough that a city of 1.75 M is attacked with a “small” nuclear weapon – then it doesn’t really matter how “small” it was – NATO would have to respond. Similarly for an attack on a US carrier. “Remember the Maine!” and all that.

    Fail Safe was a good book and a decent movie, but it’s hard to see “reasonable” actions like that happening these days.

    What does history say? The Atlantic on Able Archer in 1983:

    Considered in a vacuum, Able Archer 83, in which officer’s at NATO’s Belgium headquarters practiced their response to hypothetical chemical and nuclear conflict with a thinly-disguised Soviet Union, might not have seemed particularly threatening.

    But for two years prior to Able Archer 83, KGB agents had been scouring the world for evidence of what the Soviet leadership in general — and Andropov in particular — believed were U.S. preparations for all-out nuclear war against the U.S.S.R.

    The massive intelligence-gathering effort, called “Operation RYAN,” pressured the KGB to find proof that the U.S. was planning a “decapitating” strike against Moscow with its nuclear forces. (The Russian acronym derives from Raketno-Yadernoye Napadeniye, or nuclear missile strike.)

    According to an unclassified summary of the nuclear exercise scenario, prepared for the National Security Archive by a NATO historian, the war game began with briefings on an imaginary East-West conflict in the Middle East, including “Orange” — that is, Soviet — arms deliveries to Syria, coupled with unrest in Eastern Europe.

    Rising tensions and a change in the Soviet leadership triggered an invasion by the Red Army of Yugoslavia, Finland, Norway and Greece, according to the exercise scenario. After the “Orange” Soviets finally attacked “Blue” — U.S. and NATO forces — with chemical weapons, NATO decided to respond with two series of nuclear strikes.

    It would be foolhardy for either side to think they know how the other would react, and to assume that the genie can be controlled once it is unleashed…

    Thanks for continuing to cover this stuff for us, Cheryl. It’s important.

    Cheers,
    Scott.

  12. 12.

    Cheryl Rofer

    February 26, 2018 at 3:50 pm

    @Brachiator: I was trying to keep thing simple and focus on the uncertainties of one part of the Nuclear Posture Review (NPR, yes, I know) and deterrence.

    The NPR reviews US nuclear strategy and the status of its nuclear arsenal. The version I linked to is the unclassified version, but a classified one has presumably been prepared, with more detail.

    The US’s only real enemy to which these complicated deterrence analyses apply is Russia. North Korea makes noise, but they know that if they launch a nuke at us first, their country is gone. The discomfort on our side is that they deter us by having their artillery trained on Seoul and whatever nuclear missiles that may be trained on Japan, Guam, and the mainland. It’s not much said in the sophisticated policy circles, but being deterred is felt to be for wimps. I look at it as common sense.

  13. 13.

    Brachiator

    February 26, 2018 at 3:51 pm

    @Cheryl Rofer: Also, a stray comment you made in an earlier thread about Trump making up with Australia intrigued me. I didn’t know about the recent visit by the Australian prime minister. And in the end, it seemed as though this prime minister was eager to kiss Trump’s butt.

    The Australian press had an article about what Trump wants from Australia. Some of this appears to be a show of force with respect to North Korea and China.

    First, he wants Australia by his side as he bulks up military capacity in the western Pacific. Joe Dunford, the chairman of the joint chiefs of staff, is eager to ramp up the number of US Marines in Darwin in order to send a message about American power to friends and foes around the region. This will go ahead because it steps up the pace on an agreement between Julia Gillard and Barack Obama from 2011.

    Second, he wants Australian support for tougher action against North Korea. The new US sanctions against the rogue state are a serious challenge to Kim Jong-un because they suggest the US is willing to intercept shipments of oil, perhaps turning the measures into a blockade. That requires ships. Turnbull has offered verbal support for the sanctions but must choose whether to offer more.

    Third, Trump would “love” to see Australia mount a freedom-of-navigation operation through the South China Sea to send a message to America’s “strategic competitor” about its island bases in contested waters. Turnbull will not say whether this will happen, a big difference from Britain’s public statement of intent to send one of its ships through the sea. Should he adopt the British approach?

    Trump castigates allies who do not spend enough on their military because he suspects them of taking their powerful friend for granted. Turnbull made sure to leave no doubt about Australia’s commitment: time and again, he told Americans of the federal budget goal to spend 2 per cent of GDP on defence.

    I wondered whether Trump has a coherent foreign policy. I don’t know if it is coherent, but he keeps coming back to the same themes. He wants to show China and Korea that we ar tough, and he wants other nations to pony up more for world defense, with the US dictating global strategy.

  14. 14.

    Cheryl Rofer

    February 26, 2018 at 3:52 pm

    @Brachiator:

    Are new weapons being developed and tested?

    Probably not, but it looks like the crew of that sub did something that we’re not being told about, and they’re proud of it.

  15. 15.

    Steeplejack

    February 26, 2018 at 3:53 pm

    Maybe Trump could get the guy who did the fireworks for his and Melania’s wedding reception to run our nuclear weapons program. A good guy. A smart guy. The best.

  16. 16.

    Cheryl Rofer

    February 26, 2018 at 3:55 pm

    @Brachiator: To the extent that Trump’s foreign policy is coherent, it is the policy of bullying other nations to bend them to our (his) will. Ultimately, it’s not going to work with enemies, and it will piss off allies. We can hope it doesn’t end in nuclear war.

  17. 17.

    schrodingers_cat

    February 26, 2018 at 3:56 pm

    @Steeplejack: Its Jared’s next assignment after he is done with bringing peace to the Middle East.

  18. 18.

    schrodingers_cat

    February 26, 2018 at 3:57 pm

    @Cheryl Rofer: The school yard bully foreign policy won’t work.

  19. 19.

    Brachiator

    February 26, 2018 at 3:59 pm

    @Cheryl Rofer:

    I was trying to keep thing simple and focus on the uncertainties of one part of the Nuclear Posture Review (NPR, yes, I know) and deterrence.

    Makes sense. This stuff is, I suppose, standard procedure. The presumption is that Trump listens to the people who prepare this material and follows their advice. But I wonder whether he and his people have any big ideas that would shift from past policy.

    I freely admit that this stuff is way over my pay grade. I am just looking for some sign that the Trump Administration approaches these area with some understanding and sensitivity.

  20. 20.

    Corner Stone

    February 26, 2018 at 4:00 pm

    @Steeplejack: He’s going to be very strong on this issue, very, very strong. He’ll be looking strongly at how we can do this. We’re going to do something, believe me, and it’s going to be very strong.

  21. 21.

    efgoldman

    February 26, 2018 at 4:02 pm

    MAD was an insane strategy, but somehow it worked because Khrushchev and JFK were sensible people
    Now? “Sensible” and our vacant headed C in C have never shared a zip code.
    Nobody’s nuclear strategy foresaw a narcissistic, self-centered, mendacious, empty-headed four year old in charge
    This is very, very scary

  22. 22.

    schrodingers_cat

    February 26, 2018 at 4:02 pm

    T is not the only North American head of government who has been committing foreign policy faux pas. Trudeau did not win over India with his Indian fancy dress while openly embracing Khalistani terrorists.

    Barkha Dutt’s Wash Post op-ed.

  23. 23.

    a thousand flouncing lurkers (was fidelio)

    February 26, 2018 at 4:03 pm

    Cheryl, I am assuming you saw this, which kept popping up for me on Twitter these past few days. Any thoughts?

  24. 24.

    Brachiator

    February 26, 2018 at 4:07 pm

    @The Moar You Know:

    There is no American deterrence WRT to Russia these days, as Trump would never respond in kind unless they actually attack the US mainland, which will not happen.

    Actually, I think that modern war would have to include contingencies for attacking carrier groups, which is how lethal force is often delivered, and also attacking allied bases that might be used to deploy a nation’s forces.

    But this is just wild ass guessing on my part, but I could see a lot of modern war taking place away from the mainland of the countries at war.

  25. 25.

    Chyron HR

    February 26, 2018 at 4:07 pm

    WELL THE IMPORTANT THING IS THAT WE DIDN’T ELECT THE LESSER OF TWO EVILS.

  26. 26.

    schrodingers_cat

    February 26, 2018 at 4:08 pm

    @Chyron HR: We did save our selves from neo-liberalism though!

  27. 27.

    Brachiator

    February 26, 2018 at 4:15 pm

    @Chyron HR:

    WELL THE IMPORTANT THING IS THAT WE DIDN’T ELECT THE LESSER OF TWO EVILS.

    No,the dopes skipped that step and opted for ultimate evil.

  28. 28.

    Le Comte de Monte Cristo, fka Edmund Dantes

    February 26, 2018 at 4:16 pm

    When I first started looking at this evil shit nearly 40 years ago, the first thing that occurred to me was that those who advocated the ability of first use typically weren’t stakeholders in any initial exchange. They’d be safely ensconced in a safe CP somewhere, unaffected by the massive scale of the carnage of failed diplomacy, the consequences of which had escalated beyond rational control.

    The other thing which bugged me (and which did come out in a couple of late 80s to mid 90s fiction about limited nuclear war) was that none of the advocates of escalate to de-escalate style policies demonstrated any sort of awareness of social psychology and the economic and political circumstances which emerge from a limited nuclear exchange.

    Imagine the American public after the loss of a carrier battle group, a port or two, or an airbase in Guam or Japan.

  29. 29.

    Cheryl Rofer

    February 26, 2018 at 4:16 pm

    @efgoldman: Uh. Khrushchev sent more nukes to Cuba than we knew. Kennedy put nukes in Turkey that goaded Khrushchev to that move. Fortunately, when faced with the probability of blowing up the world, both backed off.

    Even so, as you note, it was better than today’s situation.

  30. 30.

    Cheryl Rofer

    February 26, 2018 at 4:18 pm

    @a thousand flouncing lurkers (was fidelio): I have been thinking of writing a post about that. What is most interesting to me is that the intelligence folks are making much more information available than they did in the past.

    As far as Russia doing a false flag to make it look like North Korea hacked the Olympics, that is the kind of thing Russia does these days.

  31. 31.

    Hoodie

    February 26, 2018 at 4:19 pm

    Christ, tactical nukes again? That’s so 1980s. The unofficial Russian doctrine they’re hallucinating looks more like a ruse to distract from the more effective weapons Putin’s recently developed, namely cybercrime and targeting the greed and vanity of western politicians. Of couse, we’ve helped weaponize these ourselves with things like Citizens United. Unlike the Soviets, this Russia seems to be driven by ethnocentrism and greed, not ideology, and doesn’t aspire to liberating Europe from the evils of capitalism. They like shiny BMWs and luxury apartments in the Med more than crappy ZiLs and dachas outside Moscow, and nukes would screw that up. They want the world to be a safe place for mobsters, not the proletariat. I think they’re mostly scared of us taking their turf, which we could avoid by leaving them alone (except for kicking their stooges out of our government).

  32. 32.

    Mandalay

    February 26, 2018 at 4:20 pm

    @Steeplejack:

    I know I want the author of The Art of the Deal handling this complicated shit for me!

    Not only that but we have a handbag designer putting the North Koreans in their place.

    I’m so sick of all this winning.

  33. 33.

    a thousand flouncing lurkers (was fidelio)

    February 26, 2018 at 4:21 pm

    @Cheryl Rofer: It seemed odd to me that they were so up-front about that–I figured we were at the point where the Russians were poking into everything they could find these days, on the grounds that you never knew if it might be useful or not–and what’s the point paying all those hackers if they weren’t busy hacking?

  34. 34.

    TenguPhule

    February 26, 2018 at 4:23 pm

    @Mnemosyne:

    I can see why the US would need to assume that Russia might blackmail us by nuking smaller areas and threatening to escalate further if we retaliate.

    I believe the end result of that is best summed up as “Nukes Fall, everyone dies”.

    Russia isn’t stupid enough to forget all the other nuclear powers.

  35. 35.

    trollhattan

    February 26, 2018 at 4:24 pm

    @Steeplejack:
    You mean Tony Schwartz? He seems pretty smart and level-headed to me. Let’s swap Donny the Slut for Tony!

  36. 36.

    TenguPhule

    February 26, 2018 at 4:26 pm

    @efgoldman:

    MAD was an insane strategy

    Not really. It presumed that national leaders with nuclear weapons were not fucking crazy. Given the circumstances at the time, it was really the best possible option out of a lot of bad ones.

    Of course, this presumed that crazies would not eventually take over…..

  37. 37.

    Ruckus

    February 26, 2018 at 4:27 pm

    @Brachiator:

    I am just looking for some sign that the Trump Administration approaches these area with some understanding and sensitivity.

    The thought is grand, I’m pretty sure though that this is a fools game. They have demonstrated since day one and time and time again that understanding and sensitivity are non existent in drumpf world and that if someone, somewhere suggests anything that might be construed to have any at all, it will be rapidly squashed.

  38. 38.

    TenguPhule

    February 26, 2018 at 4:31 pm

    @Cheryl Rofer:

    The idea is that Russia would detonate a small nuke to show that it’s really serious, and the United States would be scared off.

    And how would that work? Missile, briefcase, or cargo hold?

    Firing a missile would pretty much start Wargames live action.

    Briefcase or cargo bomb would probably trigger a terrorism search first. Any State actor behind it would be traced back by the radiation signature of the nuclear core……Oh.

  39. 39.

    TenguPhule

    February 26, 2018 at 4:31 pm

    @Brachiator:

    I am just looking for some sign that the Trump Administration approaches these area with some understanding and sensitivity.

    I trust this is sarcasm.

  40. 40.

    Mnemosyne

    February 26, 2018 at 4:33 pm

    @Mandalay:

    Not only that but we have a handbag designer plagiarist putting the North Koreans in their place.

    Sorry, couldn’t resist the fix.

  41. 41.

    efgoldman

    February 26, 2018 at 4:33 pm

    @Cheryl Rofer:

    when faced with the probability of blowing up the world, both backed off.

    Exactly. Doesn’t preclude the dumb shit either did first.

  42. 42.

    Cheryl Rofer

    February 26, 2018 at 4:36 pm

    @TenguPhule: It would be via missile or bomber. Russia would want it to be unambiguously theirs to send the message.

    One of the things that bothers me about these byzantine strategies is that the theme of “sending a message” runs through it. Russia would nuke a carrier group to send a message. Then we would nuke Rostov to send a message.

    As Rikyrah says
    UH-HUH
    UH-HUH

  43. 43.

    Corner Stone

    February 26, 2018 at 4:37 pm

    @Mandalay:

    Not only that but we have a handbag designer putting the North Koreans in their place.

    “Hey there, North Korea. Nice little country you’ve got. Be a shame if anything bad happened to it. Now agree to beat the slave wage prices China is giving me for making my shitty stolen designer goods or you’ll see Phase II. Motherfucker.”

  44. 44.

    Cheryl Rofer

    February 26, 2018 at 4:38 pm

    @Hoodie: Wait until you see the Missile Defense Report, which should come out in a week or so! Here’s a response in the Twitter conversation to the discussions so far of the leaks about it.

    Jupiter, Doom Panther of Darkness, is less than amused by the possible return of Star Wars. pic.twitter.com/3NRyFRTCGO

    — Martin “Yellowcake” Pfeiffer (@NuclearAnthro) February 26, 2018

  45. 45.

    TenguPhule

    February 26, 2018 at 4:40 pm

    @Cheryl Rofer:

    One of the things that bothers me about these byzantine strategies is that the theme of “sending a message” runs through it. Russia would nuke a carrier group to send a message. Then we would nuke Rostov to send a message.

    And China, France, India, Pakistan and Great Britain would presumably be adopting a wait and see attitude towards all of this instead of immediately trying to get their nukes launched in this scenario dreamed up by conservative lunatics?

    Not knocking on you, Cheryl, just noting as others have that these stupid people have forgotten a bunch of other countries have nuclear weapons too.

  46. 46.

    TenguPhule

    February 26, 2018 at 4:42 pm

    @Corner Stone:

    “Hey there, North Korea. Nice little country you’ve got. Be a shame if anything bad happened to it. Now agree to beat the slave wage prices China is giving me for making my shitty stolen designer goods or you’ll see Phase II. Motherfucker.”

    Followed by Ivanka getting slapped in the face by two women with VX on their hands.

  47. 47.

    Frankensteinbeck

    February 26, 2018 at 4:44 pm

    This whole post is a reminder that there are people whose job is to game out military procedure way past the point it makes sense. That’s a thing we should do, but hoo boy, has this crossed that line. I wouldn’t be surprised if Putin would use a tactic like that… in the incredibly unlikely situation of a major military war between our nations. That’s a gigantic, reality-warping counterfactual, and gets us into weird po ker scenarios where no additional type of weapon will ever have more importance than the psychological standoff between leaders.

    @trollhattan:
    Trump did not do that. It was a rare but conventional tactic already ordered that he had nothing to do with. The man is too chickenshit to escalate like that, thank goodness. But somebody in the media heard ‘mother of all bombs’ and the entire punditariat has a simultaneous orgasm.

  48. 48.

    Steeplejack

    February 26, 2018 at 4:44 pm

    @Brachiator:

    I know we’ve established that it’s possible to have no more fucks left to give. Is it similarly possible to run out of I-can’t-evens? Because I’m at that point today. Everything Trump-related is hitting my last nerve.

    This instance:

    Brisbane Times: First, [Trump] wants Australia by his side as he bulks up military capacity in the western Pacific. Joe Dunford, the chairman of the joint chiefs of staff, is eager to ramp up the number of U.S. Marines in Darwin in order to send a message about American power to friends and foes around the region.

    Yes, by all means let’s “bulk up” our already dangerously overstretched (and expensive) hard power while we piss away our soft power at a fire-hose rate: TPP scuttled, no ambassador in Seoul (or Singapore, last I heard), State Department being dismantled from within, Trump so far unsuccessful in any trade deals with anyone in Asia, Don Jr. giving off-the-cuff policy speeches in between pimping condos, Ivanka briefing the South Koreans in between glamming it up at the Olympics, etc., ad nauseam. Grr.

    That sends a goddamn message about American power to friends and foes around the region.

  49. 49.

    Ryan

    February 26, 2018 at 4:45 pm

    @Tom Levenson: We know Trump is the kind of person who would charge into a building erupting in gunshots, even if he isn’t properly armed…

  50. 50.

    Steeplejack

    February 26, 2018 at 4:48 pm

    @Corner Stone:

    And it will show Jhina what’s what!

    Russia, eh, we don’t talk about that.

  51. 51.

    No Drought No More

    February 26, 2018 at 4:52 pm

    “Thius is not a left-right thing”.

    Nicole Wallace said that a few minutes ago re. Trump Inc. and the nation’s security. Wallace- a person who has only recently come to my attention, and seems otherwise sensible enough- is wrong about that, and/or in denial. She still clings to the memory of her former party as being, somehow, intrinsically foreign to the 2018 GOP corpse that appalls her.

    Wallace ought to think back to Bob Dole’s gracious concession speech in 1996. It was so gracious, in fact, that it drew a loud and angry reaction from much of the assembled republican loyalists. Wallace surely remembers that. Libby was appalled, and shook her head disapprovingly at them, but it didn’t matter anymore.

    I also wonder: who does she think Dick Cheney is?

  52. 52.

    trollhattan

    February 26, 2018 at 4:56 pm

    @Frankensteinbeck:
    Learning of a giant bomb with a kewhl name must have pleased Trump like a 6 YO discovering his new birthday skateboard. I remain curious about his reaction when the navy told him we have boats that drive underwater.

  53. 53.

    Le Comte de Monte Cristo, fka Edmund Dantes

    February 26, 2018 at 4:58 pm

    @Chyron HR:

    Hillary was a worse warmonger, and would have kept up the neoliberal consensus.

  54. 54.

    TenguPhule

    February 26, 2018 at 5:00 pm

    Trump Organization says it has donated foreign profits to U.S. Treasury but declines to share details

    Doesn’t this sound familiar.

    They lie ALL THE FUCKING TIME.

  55. 55.

    efgoldman

    February 26, 2018 at 5:02 pm

    @Frankensteinbeck:

    I wouldn’t be surprised if Putin would use a tactic like that…

    I doubt that Putin, or any other leader or their military or strategists gamed out a pre-schooler and a bunch of incompetents in the WH

  56. 56.

    Corner Stone

    February 26, 2018 at 5:02 pm

    @No Drought No More: You’re mis-characterizing her comment on WH security clearances. She was calling out Ryan and other R leaders at why they weren’t doing anything.

  57. 57.

    TenguPhule

    February 26, 2018 at 5:04 pm

    @efgoldman:

    I doubt that Putin, or any other leader or their military or strategists gamed out a pre-schooler and a bunch of incompetents in the WH

    And you would be wrong.

    That’s the one thing every leader on Earth is doing non-stop behind closed doors right now.

  58. 58.

    Corner Stone

    February 26, 2018 at 5:04 pm

    @Le Comte de Monte Cristo, fka Edmund Dantes:

    Hillary was a wHorse warmonger

    And she would have ridden in to the WH on a pale horse.

  59. 59.

    cintibud

    February 26, 2018 at 5:04 pm

    I am starting to feel like the scared kid I was in the early 60’s. Just Sunday my sister was talking about a book she just read: Daniel Elsberg’s new book The Doomsday Machine. I just checked it out on Amazon but don’t know if I can read it and ever sleep again. It’s a fascinating story of how the book was written in the first place and why it took so long – The Pentagon Papers was just supposed to be a lead up to it.

    The thing that stuck with me from my conversation was that when Elsberg first saw Dr. Strangelove, he gasped “This is a documentary!” Apparently he is saying that the Nuclear Football, which could only be used by the president, is just a prop and there are any number of potential Gen Jack D Rippers who could launch a nuclear strike.

    That’s just one thing. Reading Chery’s post just brought all that back to me.

    Any comments on that book?

  60. 60.

    efgoldman

    February 26, 2018 at 5:04 pm

    @Steeplejack: What Marines? Clay soldiers like in ancient China? Paper equipment like WW2 Britain?

  61. 61.

    TenguPhule

    February 26, 2018 at 5:06 pm

    @efgoldman:

    What Marines?

    Okinawa has some, Guam has some, Hawaii has some.

    Sure it would leave us naked, but the bodies are there if he wants them.

  62. 62.

    Mandalay

    February 26, 2018 at 5:06 pm

    @Ryan:

    We know Trump is the kind of person who would charge into a building erupting in gunshots

    Digby dug up a quote (from Trump himself) which reveals just how brave he would have been at Parkland:

    I was at Mar-a-Lago and we had this incredible ball, the Red Cross Ball, in Palm Beach, Florida. And we had the Marines. And the Marines were there, and it was terrible because all these rich people, they’re there to support the Marines, but they’re really there to get their picture in the Palm Beach Post… so you have all these really rich people, and a man, about 80 years old—very wealthy man, a lot of people didn’t like him—he fell off the stage.

    And you know what I did? I said, ‘Oh my God, that’s disgusting,’ and I turned away,” said Trump. “I couldn’t, you know, he was right in front of me and I turned away. I didn’t want to touch him… he’s bleeding all over the place.
    I felt terrible, you know, beautiful marble floor, didn’t look like it. It changed color. Became very red….His wife is screaming—she’s sitting right next to him, and she’s screaming.
    I was saying “Get that blood cleaned up! It’s disgusting!”

    A man falls and bleeds so Trump turned away, and worried about the disgusting blood on his beautiful marble floor.

    ETA: I just noticed that although it was nothing to do with the story, Trump had to mention about the man “a lot of people didn’t like him”. Completely irrelevant, but Trump had to tell us anyway.

  63. 63.

    ?BillinGlendaleCA

    February 26, 2018 at 5:08 pm

    @Le Comte de Monte Cristo, fka Edmund Dantes: …and she had an email server in her basement.

  64. 64.

    Cheryl Rofer

    February 26, 2018 at 5:09 pm

    @cintibud: The distributed authority that Ellsberg talks about was the case in the 1960s, but no longer. It’s solely up to the man in the White House, which is no longer good news. We did learn some things from the Cuban Missile Crisis.

  65. 65.

    ?BillinGlendaleCA

    February 26, 2018 at 5:09 pm

    @Corner Stone:

    And she would have ridden in to the WH on a pale horse.

    Thank God we have Trump, he’d never do that*.

    *He’s afraid of horses.

  66. 66.

    TenguPhule

    February 26, 2018 at 5:11 pm

    With the justice holding the decisive vote silent, a divided Supreme Court sparred today over a case that could undermine the financial footing of labor unions that represent government workers.

    The justices heard arguments in a challenge to an Illinois law that allows unions representing government employees to collect fees from workers who choose not to join.

    Amid colorful, occasionally angry comments from his colleagues, Justice Neil Gorsuch asked no questions during the hourlong session.

    The court split 4-4 the last time it considered the issue in 2016 following the death of Justice Antonin Scalia. Gorsuch joined the court in April and has yet to weigh in on union fees. Organized labor is a big supporter of Democratic candidates and interests. Unions strongly opposed Gorsuch’s nomination by President Donald Trump.

    The unions say the outcome could affect more than 5 million government workers in 24 states and the District of Columbia.

    This is gonna be trouble when the decision comes down. 2018 and 2020 GOTV and fundraising are gonna get hurt when the Unions get assassinated by proxy.

  67. 67.

    efgoldman

    February 26, 2018 at 5:15 pm

    @TenguPhule:

    This is gonna be trouble when the decision comes down.

    Like there’s any doubt how the stolen justice will vote

  68. 68.

    cintibud

    February 26, 2018 at 5:15 pm

    @Cheryl Rofer: Thanks Cheryl, any comment on anything else in the book? I don’t know how Ellsberg is regarded these days – Is he respected or considered a crank? (I know, probably both)

  69. 69.

    efgoldman

    February 26, 2018 at 5:16 pm

    @TenguPhule:

    That’s the one thing every leader on Earth is doing non-stop behind closed doors right now.

    Now? Sure. The previous 20-30-40-50 years not so much.

  70. 70.

    TenguPhule

    February 26, 2018 at 5:20 pm

    @efgoldman:

    Now? Sure. The previous 20-30-40-50 years not so much.

    Pretty certain they just dusted off the Bush Jr. scenarios and adjusted them downwards for rationality and intelligence.

  71. 71.

    Brachiator

    February 26, 2018 at 5:28 pm

    @TenguPhule:

    I am just looking for some sign that the Trump Administration approaches these area with some understanding and sensitivity.

    I trust this is sarcasm.

    Partly. These plans seem to be standard operating procedure. We don’t know, or haven’t heard, whether anyone wants to seriously revise or scrap them.

  72. 72.

    Formerly disgruntled in Oregon

    February 26, 2018 at 5:28 pm

    @TenguPhule: Think this might help Union folks who have been squishy on Dems remember how Republicans treat their right to organize? Yeah, I didn’t either.

  73. 73.

    Aleta

    February 26, 2018 at 5:29 pm

    Edward-Isaac Dovere
    @IsaacDovere

    Sarah Huckabee Sanders just clarified that when President Trump said earlier that he’d have run into the school with the active shooter, he didn’t really mean that he’d run into a school with an active shooter but rather that he’d “be a leader”

    To reclarify: He didn’t really mean that he’d “be a leader.” Rather that he wants to recapture the high that time when he descended the golden escalator to say he would run.

  74. 74.

    Cheryl Rofer

    February 26, 2018 at 5:33 pm

    @cintibud: I have not read the book. So many books, so little time. I did enjoy the film, “The Post,” in which he figures prominently, but with respect to the Pentagon Papers.

  75. 75.

    Le Comte de Monte Cristo, fka Edmund Dantes

    February 26, 2018 at 5:36 pm

    @Mandalay:

    I’ve long said that the entitled, useless, ignorant bloated fuck is emotionally incapable of personal sacrifice.

  76. 76.

    Mary G

    February 26, 2018 at 5:40 pm

    Ugh, the thought of what Twitler will do when his approval ratings really crater is scary as shit. It’s just like him to think that since so many of our idiot pundits praised him for the completely idiotic and wasteful bombing of a Syrian airfield that the way to get back into their good graces is to throw a Really Big Bomb at somebody. Since he appears fascinated with nukes that seems like where his mind would go.

    Meanwhile, I am still worried about the stories a few months ago about Russian submarines hanging around the data cables at the bottom of the Atlantic connecting the US and Europe. If they went out, there would be cyber chaos. Hopefully the sub with the Jolly Roger was doing something about that.

  77. 77.

    Corner Stone

    February 26, 2018 at 5:44 pm

    @Formerly disgruntled in Oregon: Do black people still exist?

  78. 78.

    Le Comte de Monte Cristo, fka Edmund Dantes

    February 26, 2018 at 5:46 pm

    @Formerly disgruntled in Oregon:

    The Average White Midwest blue collar voter:

    “Sure, it’s harder to organize in order to improve my pay and working conditions. On the other hand, they’re progun, antigay, anti-woman and colored is gonna know it’s place and shut the hell up.”

  79. 79.

    Mary G

    February 26, 2018 at 5:47 pm

    O/T but I needed cheering up. This is cut and pasted from a Tumblr user named gallustrostomegalus, because I don’t know how to embed posts from there:

    Unexpected Benefit of Black Panther: my local pet shelters went from having something like 50-60 black cats between them to having NONE, becuase they’ve all been adopted out and named after the characters. “T’challa” is the most popular, but there are a fair number of “Okoye”s and “Shuri”s as well.

    …and one very confused Elderly Humane Society Volunteer wondering why someone would name such a sweet cat “Killmonger”.

  80. 80.

    MisterForkbeard

    February 26, 2018 at 5:50 pm

    @TenguPhule: I have a really hard time believing anyone could decide that the law demands that…. unions protect and benefit ALL workers, but those same workers don’t have to pay or contribute to that protection.

    But then, at least 4 of our Supreme Court Justices are more interested in hurting Democrats than they are in Justice, so it makes complete sense.

  81. 81.

    polyorchnid octopunch

    February 26, 2018 at 5:53 pm

    @schrodingers_cat: There’s been a lot of push-back on that point of view, mostly from journalists in the area (i.e. not Canadian) who call it bullshit, and point out that the person in question has a) been rehabilitated in the eyes of the law in India, and b) works with the government now. Also, most of the noise in NA has originated with bullshit Canadian RWNJ organs like the Toronto Sun, 689 Talk Radio, and Rebel Media.

    I personally would really like it if the authorities here investigated Ezra Levant for possibly taking Russian and US money; there’s no reason to think Canada’s been exempt from ru/rw ratfscking, and in fact Trudeau and his domestic popularity are probably their biggest problems in portraying their inevitability.

    For example, despite the attempts to portray his townhall tour as a failure, that has simply not flown with the vast majority of Canadians who remember all too well Harper’s allergy to dealing with mere citizens. They’ve been reduced to trying to take part of a joke out of context, selectively editing it, and trying to nail it to the wall; it hasn’t gone so well as when you look at their posts usually you find multiple replies with pointers to the entire publicly available video queued up to the moment in question and saying “this is bullshit” in more or less words. Oh, and trying to make fun of his socks, hair, and history as a teacher. It’s not working very well outside the fevered swamp; mostly it’s cementing the large middle’s dislike of the Reformatory party.

  82. 82.

    Another Scott

    February 26, 2018 at 5:54 pm

    Relatedly, kinda sorta. Florida Man strikes again:

    Matt Pearce ?‏Verified account @mattdpearce

    Matt Pearce ? Retweeted Craig Pittman

    “He commissioned a sign with a Middle East flavor and hung it on a wrought iron gate at the front of the property for a month. Written in Arabic, the sign read: This is not a mosque.”Matt Pearce ? added,

    Craig [email protected]

    #Florida man building home as exact replica of Jefferson Memorial decides to punk the neighbors who worry he’s building a mosque http://www.tampabay.com/florida-man-jefferson-memorial-house … via @romano_tbtimes

    12:30 PM – 26 Feb 2018

    Hehe.

    (via LOLGOP on Twitter)

    Cheers,
    Scott.

  83. 83.

    Corner Stone

    February 26, 2018 at 5:58 pm

    @MisterForkbeard: Anyone want to bet where Gorsuch comes down on this?

  84. 84.

    Brachiator

    February 26, 2018 at 5:59 pm

    @Mary G:

    Unexpected Benefit of Black Panther: my local pet shelters went from having something like 50-60 black cats between them to having NONE

    Aww. That’s cute.

  85. 85.

    TenguPhule

    February 26, 2018 at 6:00 pm

    @Aleta:

    he didn’t really mean that he’d run into a school with an active shooter but rather that he’d “be a leader”

    Nothing Trump says means anything that the words actually say.

    Can you imagine President Obama’s spokesperson trying to excuse this level of bullshit?

    The Ministry of Truth.

  86. 86.

    TenguPhule

    February 26, 2018 at 6:01 pm

    @Another Scott: Wasn’t Florida Man reserved for stupid weird acts? Not just good old fashioned snarking?

  87. 87.

    TenguPhule

    February 26, 2018 at 6:05 pm

    @MisterForkbeard:

    I have a really hard time believing anyone could decide that the law demands that…. unions protect and benefit ALL workers, but those same workers don’t have to pay or contribute to that protection.

    They’ve done it in over 20 states. “Right to Work as a Free rider”.

    Bribery is gonna become part of the government service requirements soon. If you want anything done, you’re gonna have to pay the workers handling it for you, because for damn sure the government isn’t going to be paying them enough to make it worth their time.

  88. 88.

    germy

    February 26, 2018 at 6:12 pm

    The Pentagon recently said that they would use nukes to retaliate against a major cyberattack on infrastructure.

    Russia has a long record of hacking infrastructure, and is now trying to pin hacks on North Korea — which Trump's already threatened to nuke.

    Recipe for disaster.

    — Sarah Kendzior (@sarahkendzior) February 25, 2018

  89. 89.

    debbie

    February 26, 2018 at 6:19 pm

    @Steeplejack:

    Oh, please. When that day comes, I’ll still be laughing at his remark earlier today about rushing into a school shooting even if unarmed. Speaking of, why doesn’t he rush in empty handed and just steal North Korea’s nuclear weapons? Is he afraid or something?

  90. 90.

    schrodingers_cat

    February 26, 2018 at 6:20 pm

    @polyorchnid octopunch: Barkha Dutt* is not Canadian, she is an Indian journalist who is quite unpopular with the ruling BJP.
    Another article from a decidedly non RWNJ Indian publication about Twitter reaction to the Trudeau trip
    I am sure JT means well, he is good looking and so is his family but fwiw the entire dress-up bit comes across as a bit condescending. YMMV.
    Indian government was not happy with the Atwal invitation. He was later uninvited to the Canada House party.
    * I linked to her op-ed in Wash Post.

  91. 91.

    schrodingers_cat

    February 26, 2018 at 6:25 pm

    @polyorchnid octopunch: Article from the Guardian

  92. 92.

    debbie

    February 26, 2018 at 6:26 pm

    @cintibud:

    Ellsburg supports Snowden, if that’s any indication.

  93. 93.

    Bill Arnold

    February 26, 2018 at 6:30 pm

    @trollhattan:

    You mean Tony Schwartz? He seems pretty smart and level-headed to me. Let’s swap Donny the Slut for Tony!

    Or for Johnny Depp. :-)
    Not impressed by Donald J. Trump’s negotiation skills demonstrated so far as POTUS. He has an wide-open opportunity for a seriously-Nobel-peace-prize-worthy negotiation win with North Korea. He should pursue it. IMO. (Being serious here BTW.)

  94. 94.

    Jay

    February 26, 2018 at 6:39 pm

    @polyorchnid octopunch:

    Yup.

    Indian Nationalists were playing their own political games with Trudeau’s visit.

  95. 95.

    Alain the site fixer

    February 26, 2018 at 6:39 pm

    @Frankensteinbeck: oh, you can now write poker! And casino. And Cialis. And….

  96. 96.

    polyorchnid octopunch

    February 26, 2018 at 6:40 pm

    @schrodingers_cat: So, the twitter reaction article. Now, take a look at who Candace Malcolm works for. She is not disinterested. She has been part of the Canadian RWNJ propaganda contingent for years. She’s part of the machinery attempting to do to Trudeau in Canada what’s been done to Hillary in the US.

    Now, as far as Mr. Satwal is concerned, here is a Canadian source talking about Satwal and India: https://www.thestar.com/news/canada/2018/02/22/trudeau-says-convicted-sikh-extremist-should-not-have-been-invited-to-event-in-india.html Money quotes here:

    Convicted gunman Jaspal Atwal, the Vancouver-area man at the centre of a political storm that has marred Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s trip to India, was removed from the Indian government’s own travel blacklist several months ago, suggesting the Indian government did not view him as security risk, the Star has learned.

    …

    However, one source said Atwal, a convicted terrorist in the eyes of Canadian courts, was not removed from India’s notoriously hardline blacklist at the behest of any Canadian government official or agency.

    That source said also that Atwal is known to have met with and has “close links” to Indian diplomatic officials with the Indian consulate office in Vancouver, and is close to other Indian officials as well. The insider suggested the Indian government itself appears to have accepted that “somehow his (Atwal’s) views on the issue of an independent Khalistan have evolved” and that he is “much more comfortable with” the government of India.

    This is being run as an operation in an attempt to get rid of Trudeau and his overarching message of diversity making countries stronger and more peaceful. The more successful we are here in Canada at managing these things well (and we take in on a per-capita basis far more refugees and immigrants than the US does), the more we show up the reactionaries that currently run the show in your country.

  97. 97.

    polyorchnid octopunch

    February 26, 2018 at 6:43 pm

    @schrodingers_cat: Yeah… that looks mostly like people criticising sartorial choices. I’m yawning here. We have multi-culti here as a policy for a reason. I’d like to recommend some of John Ralston Saul’s books on Canadian political history and political philosophy (a lot of which is good even if a lucky accident of history for those of us here now) to get an idea of how it works here. It’s actually very very different from how it works in the US.

  98. 98.

    Bill Arnold

    February 26, 2018 at 6:47 pm

    @germy:

    The Pentagon recently said that they would use nukes to retaliate against a major cyberattack on infrastructure.

    Did they actually say that, or were they advocating for massive spending increases in “cyber capabilities”. (Hate that adjective, more when used as a noun.)

  99. 99.

    polyorchnid octopunch

    February 26, 2018 at 6:49 pm

    @Jay: I think it’s important to remember that Harjit Sajjan, Canada’s Minister of Defence and an Af-Pak veteran is Sikh, as is the current leader of the New Democratic Party. These are both major firsts in Canadian politics, and show how truly truly differently we handle immigration and integration here in Canada; we don’t have random gun nut bigots shooting up Sikh temples, instead they’re made Minister of Defence and and get elected to run one of the three major political parties.

    There are a lot of people (including a lot of powerful individuals in Russia and the US) that want this to end because it makes them look like the oligarchic bigots that they are.

  100. 100.

    schrodingers_cat

    February 26, 2018 at 6:54 pm

    @polyorchnid octopunch: I am looking at this from the Indian POV, not the Canadian POV. The articles I linked to with the exception of the last one in the Guardian are all from the Indian media. From what I have seen it looks like JT used his Indian trip as a stage to score points back home while ignoring what his hosts wanted.
    I remember the Kanishka hijacking and General Vaidya’s and Mrs Gandhi’s assassination. The world doesn’t revolve around the concerns of western countries alone.

  101. 101.

    Corner Stone

    February 26, 2018 at 6:56 pm

    @schrodingers_cat: I have to say, not being Indian or clued in on Canadian politics, it does seem like kind of an unfair hitjob. Just an observation.

  102. 102.

    Cheryl Rofer

    February 26, 2018 at 6:56 pm

    @germy:
    @Bill Arnold:
    The NPR seems to say that the administration is willing to respond to cyberattacks with nuclear force, but the administration has said that it would have to be a very bad cyberattack. They’re still figuring it out.

    Overall, expert opinion is that this NPR lowers the bar somewhat for the US to retaliate to conventional attacks with nukes.

  103. 103.

    schrodingers_cat

    February 26, 2018 at 7:07 pm

    @Corner Stone: I am not clued into Canadian politics either and I shared your opinion when I first started following the story. JT’s domestic politics may be noble but he seems to have used the India trip as a stage for his domestic politics. That is borderline offensive.
    The Sikh separatist movement of the 1980s took a lot of lives, and it was an era political turmoil with many assassinations, including that of a prime minister. It would be like a US president inviting to go along with him in his delegation to the UK someone from the IRA, who was accused of attempted murder back in Britain.

  104. 104.

    polyorchnid octopunch

    February 26, 2018 at 7:09 pm

    @schrodingers_cat: Yeah, my point on that one is that the Canadian person used in the twitter article from the actual India newspaper is a rwnj. They are looking for a narrative and glommed onto a partisan actor pretending to be a journalist (Sun had a short-lived cable news network called, and I shit you not, Fox News North). They either got used by Canadian domestic partisan interests or they happily worked with it. All the rest of them are about sartorial choices on a family vacation… and most of them are hitting the same kind of points that the reactionary Canadian right does here (PM Selfie etc). Sorry, I’m not taking that article at face value… esp. given Modi’s well-documented reactionary proclivities.

    It’s not like Modi and the BNP don’t do reactionary ethnic politics. And who is scroll.in really?

    Domain ID:D4555392-AFIN
    Domain Name:SCROLL.IN
    Created On:01-Nov-2010 20:24:54 UTC
    Last Updated On:27-Jul-2017 04:04:20 UTC
    Expiration Date:01-Nov-2023 20:24:54 UTC
    Sponsoring Registrar:eNom, Inc. (R46-AFIN)
    Status:OK
    Reason:
    Registrant ID:bf464f67a0a13dfa
    Registrant Name:Samir Patil
    Registrant Organization:Scroll Media Inc.
    Registrant Street1:4 Athens Terrace, #1
    Registrant Street2:
    Registrant Street3:
    Registrant City:Cambridge
    Registrant State/Province:MA
    Registrant Postal Code:02138
    Registrant Country:US
    Registrant Phone:+1.6173958904
    Registrant Phone Ext.:
    Registrant FAX:
    Registrant FAX Ext.:
    Registrant Email:[email protected]
    Admin ID:bf464f67a0a13dfa
    Admin Name:Samir Patil
    Admin Organization:Scroll Media Inc.
    Admin Street1:4 Athens Terrace, #1
    Admin Street2:
    Admin Street3:
    Admin City:Cambridge
    Admin State/Province:MA
    Admin Postal Code:02138
    Admin Country:US
    Admin Phone:+1.6173958904
    Admin Phone Ext.:
    Admin FAX:
    Admin FAX Ext.:
    Admin Email:[email protected]

    Oh, look, a US company headed by a person living in Massachusetts. Yeah, definitely an Indian source.

  105. 105.

    Brachiator

    February 26, 2018 at 7:10 pm

    @schrodingers_cat:

    Indian government was not happy with the Atwal invitation. He was later uninvited to the Canada House party.

    This seems like a big error, but even the author of the article you cited noted that Trudeau appeared to be blindsided by one of his own people. He will have to learn from this.

    From what I have seen it looks like JT used his Indian trip as a stage to score points back home while ignoring what his hosts wanted.

    Seems like a lot of people were trying to score points. But it does not appear that he was trying to offend, which is not the case with all leaders on these kinds of semi-staged events.

  106. 106.

    polyorchnid octopunch

    February 26, 2018 at 7:14 pm

    @schrodingers_cat: Yeah, you know, the one that as pointed out in the TorStar article above has a good working relationship with the Indian consulate in Vancouver and who was taken off the travel blacklist some time back by elements within the Indian government. And yeah, ’cause you know, there’s no examples of exactly that sort of thing in US politics: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2011/03/04/AR2011030406635.html

  107. 107.

    Jay

    February 26, 2018 at 7:17 pm

    @polyorchnid octopunch:

    Yup, and there’s no shortage of “useful idiots” in the Canadian Media piling on.

    It’s not hurting Trudeau’s numbers any.

  108. 108.

    cintibud

    February 26, 2018 at 7:21 pm

    @debbie:

    Ellsburg supports Snowden, if that’s any indication.

    Heh. That’s a damming data point

  109. 109.

    Steeplejack

    February 26, 2018 at 7:23 pm

    @TenguPhule:

    Yeah, Florida Man is stupid. Florida Man does not do trolling or nuance of any kind.

  110. 110.

    schrodingers_cat

    February 26, 2018 at 7:37 pm

    @Brachiator: May be not. I want to like him too. I would trade our Orange person for JT any day. You know who was really good at this sort of a thing without seeming that they were trying too hard, Barack and Michelle. They charmed everyone on their India visits. I miss those two.

  111. 111.

    Miss Bianca

    February 26, 2018 at 7:43 pm

    @Mary G: Oh, ha ha, that is WONDERFUL news, because black cats (and dogs!) are usually the *last* to get adopted! And LOL at the “Killmonger” anecdote!

  112. 112.

    schrodingers_cat

    February 26, 2018 at 7:45 pm

    @polyorchnid octopunch: I defer to your superior knowledge of Canadian politics but Canadian politics is not the only thing at play here.

  113. 113.

    Miss Bianca

    February 26, 2018 at 7:45 pm

    @TenguPhule: And then we’re right back to where we were in the Gilded Age, before the civil service acts were passed. Feature, not bug!

  114. 114.

    TenguPhule

    February 26, 2018 at 8:01 pm

    @Miss Bianca: Everything old is new again!

  115. 115.

    Brachiator

    February 26, 2018 at 8:01 pm

    @schrodingers_cat:

    You know who was really good at this sort of a thing without seeming that they were trying too hard, Barack and Michelle. They charmed everyone on their India visits. I miss those two.

    Yep. Absolutely agree on this point.

  116. 116.

    J R in WV

    February 27, 2018 at 12:02 am

    @Brachiator:

    I saw this story at the time, it’s fascinating not to have a clue what that means.

    I forget if there was also a broom, which means a clean sweep, used all weapons to good effect. But the Jolly Roger on a Navy vessel?!!

    But the Jimmy Carter isn’t a boomer… not that it can’t ‘deliver a special weapon, but it’s primary purpose is espionage, black ops, SEALS, other spook stuff. So probably it means mission accomplished with no weapons used. Just a guess.

    I was aboard subs a little bit, but they were ’50s era diesel boats, and I was an E-2. Not an O-anything… I do know what diesel boats smelled like after a mission, not with depth charges and explosions, just after being at sea. I hope the nukes smell better, being out for months rather than weeks.

  117. 117.

    J R in WV

    February 27, 2018 at 12:40 am

    @Brachiator:

    I am just looking for some sign that the Trump Administration approaches these area with some understanding and sensitivity.

    Well, then, you are just shit out of luck!!

Comments are closed.

Trackbacks

  1. Levels of Deterrence | says:
    February 26, 2018 at 3:27 pm

    […] Cross-posted at Balloon Juice. […]

Primary Sidebar

Recent Comments

  • zhena gogolia on Open Thread (Anyone Up for a Balloon Juice Zoom on Saturday Evening?) (Mar 31, 2023 @ 6:13pm)
  • Another Scott on Good News Open Thread: That’s A Big Boy (Mar 31, 2023 @ 6:12pm)
  • zhena gogolia on Good News Open Thread: That’s A Big Boy (Mar 31, 2023 @ 6:12pm)
  • Quiltingfool on Happy Trans Day of Visibility! (Mar 31, 2023 @ 6:12pm)
  • Geminid on Good News Open Thread: That’s A Big Boy (Mar 31, 2023 @ 6:11pm)

Balloon Juice Meetups!

All Meetups
Seattle Meetup coming up on April 4!

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

Fundraising 2023-24

Wis*Dems Supreme Court + SD-8

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
We All Need A Little Kindness
Classified Documents: A Primer
State & Local Elections Discussion

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Mailing List Signup
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)

Twitter / Spoutible

Balloon Juice (Spoutible)
WaterGirl (Spoutible)
TaMara (Spoutible)
John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
TaMara
David Anderson
Major Major Major Major
ActualCitizensUnited

Join the Fight!

Join the Fight Signup Form
All Join the Fight Posts

Balloon Juice Events

5/14  The Apocalypse
5/20  Home Away from Home
5/29  We’re Back, Baby
7/21  Merging!

Balloon Juice for Ukraine

Donate

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2023 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!