• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

But frankly mr. cole, I’ll be happier when you get back to telling us to go fuck ourselves.

Washington Post Catch and Kill, not noticeably better than the Enquirer’s.

Republicans firmly believe having an abortion is a very personal, very private decision between a woman and J.D. Vance.

rich, arrogant assholes who equate luck with genius

Dear elected officials: Trump is temporary, dishonor is forever.

Beware of advice from anyone for whom Democrats are “they” and not “we.”

The real work of an opposition party is to hold the people in power accountable.

If you thought you’d already seen people saying the stupidest things possible on the internet, prepare yourselves.

Oppose, oppose, oppose. do not congratulate. this is not business as usual.

All hail the time of the bunny!

… pundit janitors mopping up after the gop

How any woman could possibly vote for this smug smarmy piece of misogynistic crap is beyond understanding.

The fundamental promise of conservatism all over the world is a return to an idealized past that never existed.

The arc of the moral universe does not bend itself. it is up to us to bend it.

“Facilitate” is an active verb, not a weasel word.

Trump should be leading, not lying.

Jesus watching the most hateful people claiming to be his followers

You know it’s bad when the Project 2025 people have to create training videos on “How To Be Normal”.

The Giant Orange Man Baby is having a bad day.

Whoever he was, that guy was nuts.

Optimism opens the door to great things.

Some judge needs to shut this circus down soon.

We cannot abandon the truth and remain a free nation.

This chaos was totally avoidable.

Mobile Menu

  • Seattle Meet-up Post
  • 2025 Activism
  • Targeted Political Fundraising
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • COVID-19
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • 2025 Activism
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • Targeted Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Anderson On Health Insurance / CSR Updates

CSR Updates

by David Anderson|  April 20, 20188:23 am| 10 Comments

This post is in: Anderson On Health Insurance, Open Threads

FacebookTweetEmail

Two pieces of Cost Sharing Reduction subsidy news this morning.  First, we’ll start with the simple news.  Louise Norris reports that Colorado is switching from being a Broad Load state to a Silver Switch state.

 

Colorado will add cost of CSR to on-exchange silver plan premiums for 2019. Off-exchange plans & non-silver exchange plans won’t include the cost of CSR in premiums. https://t.co/NxfcAyDNzV Coverage will be more affordable for a lot of subsidy-eligible enrollees @EyeOnInsurance

— Louise Norris (@LouiseNorris) April 20, 2018

This means that CSR costs in Colorado will be put onto only Silver On-Exchange plans. Currently CSR costs were spread to all plans of all metals. Bronze and Gold plans will get comparatively cheaper to Silver (the interaction of pulling out CSR while also dealing with a much sicker risk pool due to new federal policy means I can’t estimate actual price levels.) Off-Exchange buyers will now be held harmless for CSR in the state.

Colorado was one of the five states that Broad Loaded for 2018. It is rational for the remaining broad load states to move to Silver Load.

Now here is the big deal:

In holding that the plaintiffs have a common set of legal claims, the court tentatively rejected the argument that plaintiffs’ damages would vary depending on whether they’ve mitigated those damages through silver-loading. pic.twitter.com/iHZbo8ePuL

— Nicholas Bagley (@nicholas_bagley) April 19, 2018

The insurers sued almost as soon as CSR payments were terminated.  They have a very strong case that the federal government promised payment for CSR and then reneged.  Nick thought that the courts would easily rule in favor of the insurers for the 4th quarter of 2017 where there was no ability to mitigate but going forward, Silver Loading would act as a mitigating factor to minimize total federal exposure.

If we assumed mitigation was relevant, than the CSR lawsuits were worth about $2 billion for 2017 and a lot less in 2018 as the vast majority of policies sold were under some type of mitigation effort.  Going past 2018, and assuming the CBO assumption that almost every state would Silver Load by 2019, mitigation would pretty much cancel out the termination of CSR.  If mitigation was relevant, the total net present value under dispute is easily under $5 billion dollars.  It is not nothing but it is an accounting error in federal budgetary terms.

The initial ruling makes mitigation irrelevant.  The net present value under dispute for the next decade could easily reach $100 billion dollars.  Now that is some real money.  Insurers could conceivably and legally double dip with premiums funding CSR and then the courts ordering CSR payments through the automatically appropriated Judgement Fund.

I am not a lawyer so I don’t know the likelihood of that ruling being reversed on appeal up to and including the Supreme Court.  I just know that there are going to be a lot billable hours.

 

 

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « “39 Minutes”: The Comey Memos Leak
Next Post: Dems Sue Russia, Trump Campaign and WikiLeaks »

Reader Interactions

10Comments

  1. 1.

    Steve in the ATL

    April 20, 2018 at 8:50 am

    I just know that there are going to be a lot billable hours.

    YES!

  2. 2.

    Villago Delenda Est

    April 20, 2018 at 10:07 am

    This is happening because Donald Trump, Mitch McConnell, and especially Paul Ryan want to make non 1%ers feel fiscal and actual pain.

  3. 3.

    WereBear

    April 20, 2018 at 10:39 am

    President Obama and the dedicated democrats who pushed with him have put a new foundation under this house. The recent attempt to get rid of it failed.

    It’s now a part of people’s lives, and we are talking details. As we should.

  4. 4.

    WereBear

    April 20, 2018 at 10:40 am

    @Villago Delenda Est: Even more importantly, the non1&’s realized that was what was going on!

  5. 5.

    Ghost of Joe Lieblings Dog

    April 20, 2018 at 10:58 am

    @Villago Delenda Est:

    Why mince words? They hate us and want us to die. It’s a simple explanation that has fit the observed facts for at least the last ten years, probably longer.

  6. 6.

    Yutsano

    April 20, 2018 at 12:24 pm

    If I’m reading this right, the insurance companies are trying to get the benefit of the CSRs without that affecting the actual insurance rates by undoing Silver loading. Genius.

  7. 7.

    David Anderson

    April 20, 2018 at 2:43 pm

    @Yutsano: Yep

  8. 8.

    Beeb

    April 20, 2018 at 3:40 pm

    Maybe, but not necessarily. The court is correct when it says that individual questions of damages don’t preclude class certification. The “merits” question is whether mitigation should be taken into account in measuring those damages. The procedural question, though, is predominance. The court can decide the merits question differently later. As Mr. Bagley notes, the court’s view of that is tentative. It’s the “furthermore” sentence that’s doing the procedural work here. Or at least that’s my quick read of it.

    I don’t know enough about the Federal Circuit to have an opinion about how likely it is to grant permission for an interlocutory appeal if the DOJ requests one. Heck, I don’t even know whether Rule 23(f) applies to the Court of Claims. Any patent lawyers around who know?

Comments are closed.

Trackbacks

  1. Just how many billions of dollars are at stake in the litigation over cost-sharing payments? | The Incidental Economist says:
    April 20, 2018 at 12:00 pm

    […] cost-sharing provisions stay on the books is another day of additional liability. As Dave Anderson noted this morning, “[t]he net present value under dispute for the next decade could easily reach $100 […]

  2. Just how many billions of dollars are at stake in the litigation over cost-sharing payments? – Health Econ Bot says:
    April 20, 2018 at 12:12 pm

    […] cost-sharing provisions stay on the books is another day of additional liability. As Dave Anderson noted this morning, “[t]he net present value under dispute for the next decade could easily reach $100 […]

Primary Sidebar

Image by MomSense (5/21.25)

Recent Comments

  • Chetan Murthy on Wednesday Evening Open Thread: An Exemplar for Our Global Embarrassment (May 21, 2025 @ 8:35pm)
  • schrodingers_cat on Episode #3 of Personality Crisis Podcast Is Up (May 21, 2025 @ 8:34pm)
  • kindness on Novavax Update: If You Hate the Current Age Restriction… (May 21, 2025 @ 8:34pm)
  • Baud on Wednesday Evening Open Thread: An Exemplar for Our Global Embarrassment (May 21, 2025 @ 8:34pm)
  • Jay on War for Ukraine Day 1,182: The G7-1 (May 21, 2025 @ 8:33pm)

PA Supreme Court At Risk

Donate

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
War in Ukraine
Donate to Razom for Ukraine

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

Meetups

Upcoming Ohio Meetup May 17
5/11 Post about the May 17 Ohio Meetup

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)
Fix Nyms with Apostrophes

Hands Off! – Denver, San Diego & Austin

Social Media

Balloon Juice
WaterGirl
TaMara
John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
David Anderson
Major Major Major Major
DougJ NYT Pitchbot
mistermix

Keeping Track

Legal Challenges (Lawfare)
Republicans Fleeing Town Halls (TPM)
21 Letters (to Borrow or Steal)
Search Donations from a Brand

PA Supreme Court At Risk

Donate

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2025 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!