• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

Perhaps you mistook them for somebody who gives a damn.

Celebrate the fucking wins.

Fight them, without becoming them!

Michigan is a great lesson for Dems everywhere: when you have power…use it!

Today in our ongoing national embarrassment…

“In the future, this lab will be a museum. do not touch it.”

The snowflake in chief appeared visibly frustrated when questioned by a reporter about egg prices.

The current Supreme Court is a dangerous, rogue court.

Historically it was a little unusual for the president to be an incoherent babbling moron.

Welcome to day five of every-bit-as-bad-as-you-thought-it-would-be.

You don’t get rid of your umbrella while it’s still raining.

Hi god, it’s us. Thanks a heap, you’re having a great week and it’s only Thursday!

The Supreme Court cannot be allowed to become the ultimate, unaccountable arbiter of everything.

That’s my take and I am available for criticism at this time.

“Just close your eyes and kiss the girl and go where the tilt-a-whirl takes you.” ~OzarkHillbilly

Republicans are radicals, not conservatives.

Not all heroes wear capes.

Giving in to doom is how authoritarians win.

Nancy smash is sick of your bullshit.

It’s easy to sit in safety and prescribe what other people should be doing.

There are consequences to being an arrogant, sullen prick.

Let me eat cake. The rest of you could stand to lose some weight, frankly.

Live so that if you miss a day of work people aren’t hoping you’re dead.

They were going to turn on one another at some point. It was inevitable.

Mobile Menu

  • Seattle Meet-up Post
  • 2025 Activism
  • Targeted Political Fundraising
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • COVID-19
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • 2025 Activism
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • Targeted Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Open Threads / Excellent Links / Your Friday Night Must Read

Your Friday Night Must Read

by John Cole|  May 4, 20189:21 pm| 158 Comments

This post is in: Excellent Links, Our Failed Political Establishment

FacebookTweetEmail

This, by Jebediah Purdy, may be the most important thing you read this year:

The structural buttresses of that world have been crumbling since 1989, but it took a long time to fall. The year 2016 brought the first genuinely post–Cold War election: the perennial carnage of American capitalism, intensified by forty years of growing inequality, prepared the ground for Bernie Sanders’s socialism, while the nativism and racism that had slunk just outside respectable politics returned full-throated. What unifies the crisis-of-democracy genre is the failure to understand this, that the present moment is not an anomalous departure but rather a return to the baseline—to the historical norm, one might say.

The result of this error is a response to the present crisis that is at once too dramatic and too sanguine. These books all claim that Trump is unprecedented—which is not at all true. (Rather, “unprecedented” was code for “terrible” in the language of American political consensus. And, of course, he is terrible.) But these authors are also rather modest in their suggestions. None of the proposals from this genre come close to the kinds of sweeping changes that made the New Deal or even the civil-rights revolution. What might that sort of transformation look like today? For one, we need substantial redistribution, starting with marginal tax rates at the 70 percent levels that lasted until the Reagan-era cuts of the 1980s. For another, we need entirely new institutions of planning and social provision, such as universal family leave and child care to help make the economy more humane, family life less exhausting, and get closer to gender equity. We might also have to do much more to strengthen labor unions, to the point of considering radical measures such as mandatory unionization, which is often the only way to break management’s hold on labor in large firms. It could also mean a new dispensation of basic legal rights, such as granting residents, rather than only citizens, the right to vote.

Read the whole thing.

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « Kilauea Erupts in a Housing Subdivision
Next Post: Open Thread »

Reader Interactions

158Comments

  1. 1.

    Villago Delenda Est

    May 4, 2018 at 9:26 pm

    I’m not so sure about this “Bernie Sander’s socialism” shit. Because Bernie has no clue how to transform his rhetoric into reality, and neither does his fanbase. The actual work of making it happen eludes the lot of them.

  2. 2.

    Corner Stone

    May 4, 2018 at 9:29 pm

    We’re going to be told over and over, louder and louder, that anyone who proposes ideas such as these will doom the D party. DOOOOMMMM IT, I SAY!!!

  3. 3.

    wjs

    May 4, 2018 at 9:30 pm

    As long as poor people vote for the GOP, nothing in their lives will improve.

  4. 4.

    Corner Stone

    May 4, 2018 at 9:30 pm

    Unfettered capitalism will be the end of us all, there is little doubt about that at this point.

  5. 5.

    schrodingers_cat

    May 4, 2018 at 9:31 pm

    @Villago Delenda Est: A quick glance felt like a whole lot of BS bro arguments clothed in academic rhetoric.

  6. 6.

    Corner Stone

    May 4, 2018 at 9:32 pm

    Why is the flight to Alderaan cancelled? Oh….rrriiiggghhhttt…

  7. 7.

    zhena gogolia

    May 4, 2018 at 9:32 pm

    @schrodingers_cat:

    I could tell that just from the quoted passages.

  8. 8.

    schrodingers_cat

    May 4, 2018 at 9:33 pm

    @zhena gogolia: JGC was on the Snowden and GG train too, before it landed in Moscow
    .

  9. 9.

    Chyron HR

    May 4, 2018 at 9:33 pm

    Spoiler: What it actually means is the “make the white working class great again” left will combine with the “make America white again” right to form a white supremacist Duocon.

  10. 10.

    schrodingers_cat

    May 4, 2018 at 9:34 pm

    Also WTF is Democratic Socialism. Please don’t answer, Sweden. I want specifics.

  11. 11.

    Cacti

    May 4, 2018 at 9:35 pm

    @Chyron HR:

    What it actually means is the “make white working class MALES great again” leftists will combine with the “make America white again” right to form a white supremacist Duocon.

    FTFY

    Wimmins will also have to get at the back of the line.

  12. 12.

    Baud

    May 4, 2018 at 9:36 pm

    I can’t possibly see how that’s the most important thing I’ll read all year.

  13. 13.

    schrodingers_cat

    May 4, 2018 at 9:36 pm

    The structural buttresses of that world have been crumbling since 1989, but it took a long time to fall.

    Whut? What the hell is he talking about, fall of the Soviet Union?

  14. 14.

    Aimai

    May 4, 2018 at 9:39 pm

    @schrodingers_cat: yes. I think this purdy guy has form, as the brits say.

  15. 15.

    Brickley Paiste

    May 4, 2018 at 9:39 pm

    Purdy is on the right track.

    Tepid centrism isn’t going to solve this country’s problems and it doesn’t even win elections. It’s useless.

  16. 16.

    efgoldman

    May 4, 2018 at 9:40 pm

    these authors are also rather modest in their suggestions. None of the proposals from this genre come close to the kinds of sweeping changes that made the New Deal or even the civil-rights revolution

    What’s needed, and not present, is a transformative time of potential danger (Great Depression, WW2), a transformative charismatic leader (FDR) with most of the country behind him, AND transformative ideas he can sell.
    Weasel Face doesn’t fit the bill in any respect. Neither does Wilmer.

  17. 17.

    Chip Daniels

    May 4, 2018 at 9:40 pm

    America already has plenty of socialized factors of production, and always has.

    Think of how most utilities are socialized, how between Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, the VA and the ACA much of our health care has been socialized. How much of agriculture is sharply curtailed markets mixed with government support, how the military industrial complex itself is quasi-public.

    We’re not used to thinking of these things as “socialism” because we have this binary concept of what it means to put things under public control and ownership. But as any attorney will tell you, “ownership” itself is not binary; an object, or business can have many different stakeholders and controlling agents, even when they are not called “owners”.

  18. 18.

    Baud

    May 4, 2018 at 9:40 pm

    @Brickley Paiste: What does win elections then?

  19. 19.

    TenguPhule

    May 4, 2018 at 9:42 pm

    @Baud:

    I can’t possibly see how that’s the most important thing I’ll read all year.

    John Cole is obviously very pessimistic about how the rest of the year is gonna go.

  20. 20.

    TenguPhule

    May 4, 2018 at 9:42 pm

    @efgoldman:

    What’s needed, and not present, is a transformative time of potential danger

    Wait, wut?

  21. 21.

    Baud

    May 4, 2018 at 9:43 pm

    @TenguPhule: Maybe he understands how little we read.

  22. 22.

    efgoldman

    May 4, 2018 at 9:43 pm

    @Baud:

    What does win elections then?

    More votes, usually

  23. 23.

    TenguPhule

    May 4, 2018 at 9:43 pm

    @Baud:

    What does win elections then?

    Russians.

  24. 24.

    efgoldman

    May 4, 2018 at 9:44 pm

    @TenguPhule:

    Wait, wut?

    Read some good history of the 30s and 40s.

  25. 25.

    schrodingers_cat

    May 4, 2018 at 9:44 pm

    @Baud: I read the comments here. Isn’t that enough?

  26. 26.

    Steve in the ATL

    May 4, 2018 at 9:44 pm

    @Baud: seriously. You should have seen my horoscope this morning!

  27. 27.

    NotMax

    May 4, 2018 at 9:44 pm

    Important is not a synonym for puerile.

    Just sayin’.

  28. 28.

    Omnes Omnibus

    May 4, 2018 at 9:45 pm

    @Brickley Paiste: Oh hai, completely new ‘nym.

  29. 29.

    ? ?? Goku (aka Amerikan Baka) ? ?

    May 4, 2018 at 9:45 pm

    @Villago Delenda Est:
    Oh but don’t you know? None of it matters on the campaign trail! What do you expect him to do? Write a 600 page treatise on it?

    Oh and his age isn’t an issue because he keeps himself in such great shape, according to Rationalwiki.

    /s

  30. 30.

    efgoldman

    May 4, 2018 at 9:45 pm

    @Steve in the ATL:

    You should have seen my horoscope this morning!

    “You will travel to parts unknown”

  31. 31.

    schrodingers_cat

    May 4, 2018 at 9:46 pm

    @Omnes Omnibus: Bailey’s sock puppet, is my guess.

  32. 32.

    SiubhanDuinne

    May 4, 2018 at 9:46 pm

    Read the whole thing.

    Okay, Imma read the whole thing, but please don’t anyone take it amiss if I observe that Jebediah Purdy is the bestest most perfectest 17th-century American name that ever was.

  33. 33.

    ? ?? Goku (aka Amerikan Baka) ? ?

    May 4, 2018 at 9:47 pm

    @Brickley Paiste:
    Define “tepid centrism”. I’ll be waiting.

  34. 34.

    Steve in the ATL

    May 4, 2018 at 9:47 pm

    @Chip Daniels:

    But as any attorney will tell you, “ownership” itself is not binary; an object, or business can have many different stakeholders and controlling agents, even when they are not called “owners”.

    Sounds like you have a law practice like mine—representing lots of pimps!

  35. 35.

    Mary G

    May 4, 2018 at 9:47 pm

    I linked to Ian Milhiser’s tweets about that article earlier. Here are some more:

    12) Here's one nightmare scenario that strikes me as very possible — even likely. Imagine that President Harris/Booker/Gillibrand/Warren/Sanders gets elected with commanding majorities and enacts the most ambitious array of progressive legislation since the Great Society.— Ian Millhiser (@imillhiser) May 4, 2018

    13) Then imagine that all of that is struck down in a 5-4 decision joined by Judge Gorsuch — based on some legal theory that has no basis in the Constitution or legal precedent and that was invented by some Volokh Conspiracy blogger for the sole purpose of this litigation.— Ian Millhiser (@imillhiser) May 4, 2018

    14) Worse, imagine as well that the same 5-4 majority hands down a series of decisions that skew the electoral playing field even further against Democrats — a combination of Shelby County, Crawford, Citizens United, and Bush v. Gore on steroids. https://t.co/E6kP6Levw3— Ian Millhiser (@imillhiser) May 4, 2018

    He recommends reading Purdy’s piece, but I’m finding it quite hard to plow through.

  36. 36.

    Corner Stone

    May 4, 2018 at 9:48 pm

    I haven’t read the entire “most important thing” as yet, but however the author is classified, I am completely down with a higher marginal tax rate, child care, and moving toward gender equity. I am unsure about mandating union membership but in some relative aspect we’re going to need a serious addressing of Universal Basic Income as some form of mediation to what’s coming. The time for incremental policies and cowering behind a bulwark when someone screams “soc!alist!!!” is way over. The other side is Nazis.

  37. 37.

    Corner Stone

    May 4, 2018 at 9:49 pm

    @Steve in the ATL: Hey! I got my comment deleted when I tried that!

  38. 38.

    Jeffro

    May 4, 2018 at 9:49 pm

    Yeah, ‘most important thing I read this year’ – sorry JC, this isn’t cutting it. Way to long, way too overblown, veering from the obvious to the silly.

    What might that sort of transformation look like today? For one, we need substantial redistribution, starting with marginal tax rates at the 70 percent levels that lasted until the Reagan-era cuts of the 1980s. For another, we need entirely new institutions of planning and social provision, such as universal family leave and child care to help make the economy more humane, family life less exhausting, and get closer to gender equity. We might also have to do much more to strengthen labor unions, to the point of considering radical measures such as mandatory unionization, which is often the only way to break management’s hold on labor in large firms. It could also mean a new dispensation of basic legal rights, such as granting residents, rather than only citizens, the right to vote.

    – good luck with 70% tax rates, even among pretty progressive folks
    – universal family leave and child care is not an ‘entirely new institution of planning and social provision’…it’s a couple of tweaks to the tax code
    – labor unions are not coming back and certainly not going ‘mandatory’
    – good luck “granting residents, rather than only citizens, the right to vote”

    How about
    – undo everything Trumpov, his cabinet secretaries, and his enablers in the GOP Congress have done
    – add “Medicare for all”
    for starters, and then we’ll see what else can realistically get accomplished?

  39. 39.

    schrodingers_cat

    May 4, 2018 at 9:49 pm

    @Mary G: Our current really is nightmarish enough that one doesn’t have to go and invent an even more dystopian future.

  40. 40.

    ? ?? Goku (aka Amerikan Baka) ? ?

    May 4, 2018 at 9:50 pm

    What I would really like to see is a move towards workplace democracy and market socialism.

  41. 41.

    Baud

    May 4, 2018 at 9:50 pm

    @Mary G:

    Honestly, you’ve probably read it before. The style seems very familiar and formulaic.

  42. 42.

    thewesson

    May 4, 2018 at 9:50 pm

    I’d like to see the centrist idea of “basic decency” (which is about norms) fused with a quietly revolutionary socialist perspective. Like basic decency means not having your neighbor lose their house because they get cancer, and then die in the street.

    Norms aren’t stupid but just because American capitalism is a norm doesn’t mean it’s good. Norms should be about recognizing that we have a collective good, and government should represent that.

  43. 43.

    efgoldman

    May 4, 2018 at 9:51 pm

    @Omnes Omnibus:

    completely new ‘nym.

    Same old Wilmerbot

  44. 44.

    NotMax

    May 4, 2018 at 9:51 pm

    @Goku (aka Amerikan Baka)

    It’s apt shorthand for Charles Grodin’s acting.

    ;)

  45. 45.

    Steve in the ATL

    May 4, 2018 at 9:51 pm

    @efgoldman: “you will encounter a strange older woman whom you thought was an internet myth but who will ply you with wine and Cajun chicken pasta when you run into her at a bourgeois casual dining establishment of the sort where the servers wear flair though just ‘of the sort’ as they don’t literally wear flair at this particular place”

  46. 46.

    Corner Stone

    May 4, 2018 at 9:51 pm

    @Chip Daniels:

    Think of how most utilities are socialized

    They are?

  47. 47.

    tobie

    May 4, 2018 at 9:52 pm

    I will give the piece a read, but I think any interpretation of the rise of authoritarianism in the US that doesn’t address the crash of 2008 and the Citizens United decision that allowed for the flood of private money into politics and the creation of movements like the Tea Party is fairly blind. If 1989 was the trigger, how come we didn’t see more populist outcries between 1996 and 2010? Sounds like Purdy was pretty sure of his conclusion–“neoliberalism” and income inequality are the source of our malaise–before even researching the piece.

  48. 48.

    Villago Delenda Est

    May 4, 2018 at 9:53 pm

    Until the “white male working class” forgets about their problems with melanin and vaginas and languages other than out of the hollers English and starts focusing on the idea that economic well being isn’t zero sum, none of this will change the current paradigm. The “economic anxiety” crowd needs to sit down and face that they are their own worst enemies, because they keep propping up the very forces that kick them to the curb.

  49. 49.

    Aleta

    May 4, 2018 at 9:53 pm

    at :44 is Giuliani
    Giuliani Encouraging Police Terrorism Against American Democracy (1992)

  50. 50.

    Corner Stone

    May 4, 2018 at 9:53 pm

    @Steve in the ATL: Bow chicka wow wooowwww!
    “Ding Dong!”
    “Yes?”
    “I have a delivery here for you. From Sum Yung Gei.”
    “Well don’t just stand there, come in! Although I seem to have lost my wallet and all cash. Oh no.”

  51. 51.

    Another Scott

    May 4, 2018 at 9:56 pm

    Meh. I’ll pass, myself. Sorry.

    There are a whole mess of problems that need to be addressed, and the way to do it and have a lasting impact is via incremental changes. As Adam has reminded us many, the quickest way to get a backlash is to get too far in front of public opinion. Even if the new policies make all kinds of sense, and even if most people buy into the ideal in the abstract – vested interests will make up lies about everything in order to keep their power. We have to show people that the sky won’t fall if, say, millionaires pay 50% on any income above $5M or $10M a year. That would be a much easier sell than 70%.

    What would be done with the revenue brought in by making the top marginal rate 70%? In 1980 the top 70% rate kicked in for joint filers with taxable income above $215,400. 4.5% of all returns in 2015 had taxable income above $200,000.

    A relatively tiny number of people have taken almost all of the expansion of the economy in the last 35+ years. I’m all for more a progressive tax system, but to sell it we need to say what we’re going to use the money for – and get the public to buy in to it. Picking some arbitrary number and saying that we all have to support it or we’re not pure enough won’t get us where we want to be.

    Ultimately, we have to elect sensible people. That’s the way forward. Not demanding maximalist policies NOW NOW NOW.

    Cheers,
    Scott.

  52. 52.

    M. Bouffant

    May 4, 2018 at 9:56 pm

    England’s Independent: Unlike sissy Murkins, willing to mention Marx.

    Karl Marx 200th anniversary: The world is finally ready for Marxism as capitalism reaches the tipping point
    The philosopher predicted that centralisation would lead to revolution and give birth to a post-capitalist society – globalisation has led us to that point

  53. 53.

    zhena gogolia

    May 4, 2018 at 9:57 pm

    @SiubhanDuinne:

    Except it’s Jedediah. (Cole’s mistake, not yours)

  54. 54.

    Villago Delenda Est

    May 4, 2018 at 9:58 pm

    @Jeffro:

    How about
    – undo everything Trumpov, his cabinet secretaries, and his enablers in the GOP Congress have done
    – add “Medicare for all”
    for starters, and then we’ll see what else can realistically get accomplished?

    Include removing EVERY Donald appointment to the judiciary, to include Gorsuch.

    Donald has made it so that the usual “according to the Constitution” approaches to problems simply will not cut it. Membership in the Federalist Society, for example, should be a disqualification for sitting on the bench at any level. We are faced with problem the Founders could not possibly have imagined…they assumed a level of human decency that our 1% has laughed away.

  55. 55.

    Jeffro

    May 4, 2018 at 9:58 pm

    @Corner Stone:

    I am completely down with a higher marginal tax rate, child care, and moving sprinting toward gender equity.

    Co-sign w/ minor edit.

    I am unsure about mandating union membership but in some relative aspect we’re going to need a serious addressing of Universal Basic Income as some form of mediation to what’s coming.

    Agreed, big time. We can’t all be “innovators” or “creatives” or whatever the hell the term of the moment is (at least not until the day when the robots are doing literally ALL of the work, and everyone else is off doing watercolor painting, in a band, or doing underwater basketweaving). Anyone whose job is eliminated by a robot ought to get a guaranteed income (from their company, NGO, or government agency) until they are either trained-up for an equivalent job or…not.

    Put the brakes on. If robots are so awesome and increase efficiency & profits…then at least the humans they’ve replaced ought to have a chance at contributing in some other manner (or at least, to enjoy having their jobs ‘put out to pasture’)

  56. 56.

    Aleta

    May 4, 2018 at 9:58 pm

    Giuliani, in his years as a U.S. Attorney, had an impressive run prosecuting Mafia figures. This track record helped set up his successful run for New York City mayor, in 1993. But he never brought down Gigante, the biggest boss in town.

    Gigante relied on a “front boss,” installing Anthony (Fat Tony) Salerno as the nominal head of the Genovese family while he, Gigante, retained most of the actual power, to run his organized-crime empire at a remove, discreetly issuing his orders through the ever-loyal Dominick (Quiet Dom) Cirillo. In 1986, the same year that the Five Families voted on whether to kill Giuliani, Salerno was convicted as part of the Mafia Commission Trial. Gigante remained free for another decade.
    ….
    In this way, Gigante and Giuliani were allies. They both had an interest in high-profile, tabloid-cover prosecutions of loud, famous Mob figureheads. I have to assume that Giuliani understood the arrangement. He got his heads on a pike, and Gigante stayed out of the spotlight. Gigante was finally convicted—of racketeering and conspiring to kill other mobsters—in 1997, years after Giuliani stepped down as U.S. Attorney.

    I have found no evidence that Donald Trump ever met with or directly conducted business with Vincent (the Chin) Gigante. But Trump is widely believed to have struck a deal with Gigante’s front, Fat Tony, in the late nineteen-seventies and early eighties.

    -New Yorker

  57. 57.

    Baud

    May 4, 2018 at 9:59 pm

    @Villago Delenda Est:

    Donald has made it so that the usual “according to the Constitution” approaches to problems simply will not cut it

    Ironically, Donald agrees.

  58. 58.

    Villago Delenda Est

    May 4, 2018 at 10:00 pm

    @Another Scott: Hillary offered that. A majority of voters thought it was a good plan. However, our save the slaveholders electoral system undermined the whole thing.

  59. 59.

    B.B.A.

    May 4, 2018 at 10:00 pm

    I think all the Democrats really need is younger party figureheads. Nothing against our current leadership, who can continue in behind-the-scenes roles, but Republicans have the olds sewed up and the youngs won’t vote for us if we’re also seen as a party run by the olds.

    Also, fewer white dudes, but that’s something everyone needs everywhere. Signed, a white dude.

  60. 60.

    Baud

    May 4, 2018 at 10:00 pm

    @Jeffro: No gender equity?

  61. 61.

    schrodingers_cat

    May 4, 2018 at 10:01 pm

    T was not elected because of economic anxiety. When the country was really anxious about the economy they voted for Obama over McCain. So I do not agree with the central thesis of this oh so important piece.

  62. 62.

    ? ?? Goku (aka Amerikan Baka) ? ?

    May 4, 2018 at 10:02 pm

    @Another Scott:
    I agree. I think people who support Wilmer are impatient. In a way I don’t blame them but I truly think they overestimate the level of support the public has for their policies. We exist in a precarious moment where progress that has been made can be reversed fairly quickly.

  63. 63.

    NotMax

    May 4, 2018 at 10:02 pm

    @zhena gogolia

    Mind now in overdrive, spitting out a profusion of other names. Best one (IMHO) so far:

    Hepzibah Glumm.

  64. 64.

    Chet Murthy

    May 4, 2018 at 10:03 pm

    @Villago Delenda Est:

    Include removing EVERY Donald appointment to the judiciary, to include Gorsuch.

    Every goddamn last one of these fuckers. Fruit of the poison tree, goddammit! Every. Last. One.

  65. 65.

    Villago Delenda Est

    May 4, 2018 at 10:04 pm

    @Corner Stone: I’m fortunate enough to live in a city where the city owns the electric company and the water works.

    Others are not so fortunate.

  66. 66.

    Corner Stone

    May 4, 2018 at 10:04 pm

    @Another Scott: There is nothing maximalist about a higher marginal tax rate. To be afraid to push forward on progressive agendas that are popular among a majority of voters doesn’t seem to me like a screaming sockulist banshee riding down Main St.

  67. 67.

    Jeffro

    May 4, 2018 at 10:05 pm

    @Villago Delenda Est: I hear you, but I think the best we’re going to get after the dust settles is that any future president’s judicial nominees get an up-or-down vote within 60/90 dates, whether or not there is an upcoming election (unless it’s within those 60/90 days).

    Whether that becomes a Senate rule or actual law or amendment, I dunno. But we ought to push for it so that the future McConnells of the world know that they can’t pull this shit again.

    I can see courts saying “well, they may be horrible, but the Senate DID confirm them” and letting it go.

  68. 68.

    Jeffro

    May 4, 2018 at 10:06 pm

    @Baud: Sorry – my comment went up wrong, and then your comment noted it, and I just posted the edit I meant in the first place.

    I’m totes down with gender equity. Can’t happen fast enough, hence “sprint” in the edit.

  69. 69.

    Baud

    May 4, 2018 at 10:07 pm

    @Jeffro: Gotcha.

  70. 70.

    ? ?? Goku (aka Amerikan Baka) ? ?

    May 4, 2018 at 10:07 pm

    @Jeffro:
    That’s the problem and something that amazes me the most. We’re not doing anything to prepare for this as a society. Neither political party in the US has a plan to deal with mass automation eliminating millions of jobs in the future. Out of the two, the Democrats have the best chance of creating a system that will deal effectively with this. The GOP doesn’t give one shit at all and is content to tear down the government until there is virtually nothing left.

  71. 71.

    Corner Stone

    May 4, 2018 at 10:07 pm

    @Jeffro:

    But we ought to push for it so that the future McConnells of the world know that they can’t pull this shit again.

    I humbly suggest we start by letting McConnell make his case to the crows.

  72. 72.

    Villago Delenda Est

    May 4, 2018 at 10:08 pm

    @? ?? Goku (aka Amerikan Baka) ? ?: This is very true. The absurd notion of the Nader dipshit that this country is “ripe for revolution” is ingrained in the Wilmer movement. They are mistaken.

  73. 73.

    ellie

    May 4, 2018 at 10:10 pm

    @Villago Delenda Est: Thank you!

  74. 74.

    Villago Delenda Est

    May 4, 2018 at 10:10 pm

    @Corner Stone: The main reason for a high marginal tax rate is to get that capital that is doing nothing constructive out of the hands of the greedy and into the hands of people who will use it to improve society.

  75. 75.

    Corner Stone

    May 4, 2018 at 10:12 pm

    @Jeffro:

    If robots are so awesome and increase efficiency & profits

    We’re (US workers) are currently working on avg 42.5 hours a week in re: productivity. That’s the highest level for some decades, according to CNBC. Yet wages are still stagnant and have been. How much more efficient can we get without the worker seeing any benefit? I think when the time comes for the avg worker to be laid off as they roll in mass automation, and no one has anything to say about it beyond platitudes of “job retraining”, we’re going to have some trouble. The Mnuchins, the Puzdners, the Papa John’s. All those assholes should understand that what’s coming isn’t personal, it’s just business. No wait. It’s personal.

  76. 76.

    Another Scott

    May 4, 2018 at 10:13 pm

    @Villago Delenda Est: Until we have enough people in office, we can’t change the system for the better.

    I’m doing what I can to get more voters ready for November – supporting VoteRiders and the LWV.

    As you noted, Hillary beat Bernie last time. I see no evidence that his message would even be that popular this fall or in 2020.

    Revolutions are usually/mostly/always conducted by some small fraction of the population. But I don’t see a critical mass developing any time soon to throw out the Constitution and the US Code and starting over. YMMV.

    186 days to go…

    Cheers,
    Scott.

  77. 77.

    Jeffro

    May 4, 2018 at 10:14 pm

    @? ?? Goku (aka Amerikan Baka) ? ?: Amazes me too. Nobody seems to walk it through: if robots and technology keep reducing the number of people needed to do X and Y and Z, and the profits by using such robots keep flowing to the top 1%…then eventually, BEST case, folks don’t have any money to spend on whatever the robots are making.

  78. 78.

    ? ?? Goku (aka Amerikan Baka) ? ?

    May 4, 2018 at 10:15 pm

    @Villago Delenda Est:
    Eh. For the moment it’s not. But conditions would have to be pretty bad for (violent) revolution to be on the table. I mean desperately bad where tens millions are starving and out of work and have been for a decade or more and the government is seen as totally corrupt/inept.

    A totalitarian or garden variety authoritarian movement would be more likely to seize control in a revolution than a democratic socialist one.

  79. 79.

    Villago Delenda Est

    May 4, 2018 at 10:15 pm

    @Another Scott: Getting out the vote, and voting out every Rethug at every level, is really the only way. Armed revolt seems like an alternative, but look where it got the French and the Russians. I don’t trust us to be able to do this thing ala the Glorious Revolution, frankly.

  80. 80.

    Mary G

    May 4, 2018 at 10:16 pm

    More disgusting stuff:

    This is a mind-boggling story. The fossil fuel industry hired hundreds of actors to pretend they were citizens and testify at pubic hearings against renewable energy. And it worked.https://t.co/rSuPmMcWJY— Bill McKibben (@billmckibben) May 4, 2018

  81. 81.

    Jeffro

    May 4, 2018 at 10:17 pm

    @Villago Delenda Est: I’d argue the main reason is to keep them from having all that cash (i.e., weapon of mass disinformation) to throw around and distort society – what the majority of its citizens hear about, understand, act on. That’s why Citizens United is so prima facie stupid: how can anyone say that a guy pouring a billion dollars into political activities isn’t having an outside and undemocratic effect on our entire system, no matter which way he leans?

  82. 82.

    Another Scott

    May 4, 2018 at 10:17 pm

    @schrodingers_cat: +1

    Cheers,
    Scott.

  83. 83.

    Jeffro

    May 4, 2018 at 10:17 pm

    @Corner Stone: A perfectly just object lesson to both McConnell and future McConnells. I’m not wedded to my solution.

  84. 84.

    Steve in the ATL

    May 4, 2018 at 10:17 pm

    @Corner Stone: “Dear Balloon Juice After Dark Forum: I never thought this would happen to me, but I swept right on Tinder and this hottie named Judy is all ‘meet me at Chili’s’ and I’m all ’aw yeah’ and we drank house wine and ordered faux ethnic food and talked about this gossipy website we both frequent and then I left to go back to the hospital where my wife is lying in severe pain”.

    Is that an accurate summary, @SiubhanDuinne?

  85. 85.

    ? ?? Goku (aka Amerikan Baka) ? ?

    May 4, 2018 at 10:19 pm

    @Jeffro:
    And some think the solution is, “Don’t worry, everyone will be a programmer/engineer!”

    Well guess what, not everyone has the brains to be that, nor is that their passion. There’s only so many positions that would available anyway. Eventually, technology/software will be created and designed by the machines themselves and then what?

  86. 86.

    Brickley Paiste

    May 4, 2018 at 10:22 pm

    @Baud: You have to get people excited about something positive. That’s what pulls asses of the sofa and to the voting booth.

    Giving them a list of ways you are are marginally better than someone awful does not spark motivation.

  87. 87.

    Culture of Truth

    May 4, 2018 at 10:24 pm

    yeah, I remember Purdy from way back.

    current lectures are all well and good. not too many elections won, though.

  88. 88.

    oatler.

    May 4, 2018 at 10:25 pm

    Here’s the message I get from alleged liberals: “First of all, let’s shoot all the hippies.” Bill Clinton loved him some DEA.

  89. 89.

    Steve in the ATL

    May 4, 2018 at 10:25 pm

    @Villago Delenda Est: yup. Money in motion drives the economy. Giving $100 to a poor man has far more economic benefit than giving $1M to a rich man.

  90. 90.

    Brickley Paiste

    May 4, 2018 at 10:25 pm

    @Steve in the ATL:

    That was touched with genius.

  91. 91.

    Omnes Omnibus

    May 4, 2018 at 10:27 pm

    @oatler.: Here? Name and shame.

  92. 92.

    Jeffro

    May 4, 2018 at 10:28 pm

    @? ?? Goku (aka Amerikan Baka) ? ?: Right – “Hour of Code” (nor a degree in coding) for everyone ain’t gonna solve the problem.

    Everyone whose job is replaced by a robot ought to have an opportunity to retrain for current job X or projected future job Y, with said training paid for by whomever brought in the robots. If the robots’ owners are going to get to enjoy the profits, the least they could do is pay to give the displaced workers a shot at a new job. They’re also welcome to pay into a fund that lets the displaced sit on the beach with daiquiris all day. I don’t really care. The problem is that right now, there is no DISincentive for companies to quit replacing their workers with cheap labor of whatever type (robots most especially) – it’s the ultimate example of “privatize the profits, socialize the losses” there is.

  93. 93.

    ? ?? Goku (aka Amerikan Baka) ? ?

    May 4, 2018 at 10:28 pm

    @Brickley Paiste:
    And what happens when you can’t deliver? Look at the Republicans and the promises they’ve made to their base. Look what It’s gotten them. Further radicalization and anger over the last 20 years.

    I agree you need to excite voters, but you need to at least have some working theory of how your policies are going to be implemented. IOW, you can’t just make promises without knowing how your policies will work. You also can’t overpromise.

  94. 94.

    Omnes Omnibus

    May 4, 2018 at 10:28 pm

    @Steve in the ATL: How is she doing?

  95. 95.

    zhena gogolia

    May 4, 2018 at 10:30 pm

    I want Lily.

  96. 96.

    Brickley Paiste

    May 4, 2018 at 10:31 pm

    @Villago Delenda Est:

    This. Govenment is an engine to produce a better society.

  97. 97.

    efgoldman

    May 4, 2018 at 10:31 pm

    @Steve in the ATL:

    “you will encounter a strange older woman whom you thought was an internet myth

    When did you meet mrs efg?

  98. 98.

    Another Scott

    May 4, 2018 at 10:31 pm

    @Corner Stone: 50% is higher than what we have now, but it’s not 70%. And I don’t think having it kick in at $215,000 x (inflation since 1980) would be an easy sell.

    Maybe it’s addressed in the piece, but I don’t think that picking 70% because it was the rate in 1980 is a good reason. It was 91% under Eisenhower – why not 91%? Give me a reason. Tell me what you’re going to do with the money, tell me who’s going to pay it, and tell me why you’ve made those choices.

    If I were benevolent dictator in charge of the federal tax system, I would make a list of problems that need to be addressed over the next 2, 5, 10, 20, 100 years, and construct a tax system that would address them. It would be a combination of making life easier and better for the bottom half of the family income system, for the elderly and disabled (and those caring for them), for those growing up and attending school, etc., and investing in things that companies have little or no interest in investing in (basic research (especially with long timelines)), efficiency of all kinds, understanding of the brain and why we think and react the way we do, etc., mitigating and reducing climate change and GHG emissions, and all the rest. Minimizing the “tragedy of the commons”.

    Too many people think that taxes just end up in a black hole, spent by bureaucrats at conventions in Las Vegas or junkets to Fiji or Montreux or Cannes or foreign aid to tinpot dictators that thumb their nose at us. We can’t sell tax increases without telling people – even, actually especially, people who would never pay it because they would never earn enough to be affected by it.

    The excerpt looks like a demand for purity, and a way to split Democrats, to me. YMMV.

    Cheers,
    Scott.

  99. 99.

    efgoldman

    May 4, 2018 at 10:32 pm

    @Villago Delenda Est:

    The “economic anxiety” crowd needs to sit down and face that they are their own worst enemies, because they keep propping up the very forces that kick them to the curb.

    Right. Like that will ever happen.

  100. 100.

    Chip Daniels

    May 4, 2018 at 10:33 pm

    One thing we have learned is that there is no price for radicalism.
    For most of the past few decades, it was accepted wisdom that Murkins loved placid Broderist centrism and anything outside of that was unpossible.

    But as we are seeing, one can shatter norms and precedent in a lot of directions.

  101. 101.

    Jay

    May 4, 2018 at 10:33 pm

    @schrodingers_cat:

    There is actual economic anxiety, but people who are/were actually economically anxious, didn’t vote for Treason Tribble.

  102. 102.

    Jeffro

    May 4, 2018 at 10:35 pm

    @? ?? Goku (aka Amerikan Baka) ? ?:

    You also can’t overpromise.

    Yup. fundamental problem of democracy – sense that it overpromises and under-delivers.

  103. 103.

    Corner Stone

    May 4, 2018 at 10:36 pm

    @Another Scott: I said “higher” not 70% nor 91%, thanks. I find your approach to be a recipe for short, mid and long term failure. Patiently explaining every number in a 400 page tax proposal is going to get us fucking hammered in elections we should be competing/winning. Not a big fan of more timidity in the face of kleptocracy/Nazi opponents.

  104. 104.

    B.B.A.

    May 4, 2018 at 10:37 pm

    @Chip Daniels: This is another IOKIYAR deal. A Democrat who wants to loosen work requirements on SNAP is a filthy commie to be hanged for treason, but a Republican who wants to bring back Jim Crow, that’s just straight talk and solid leadership.

  105. 105.

    efgoldman

    May 4, 2018 at 10:37 pm

    @Another Scott:

    the way to do it and have a lasting impact is via incremental changes

    Frog in the pot doesn’t work. There will be backlash; people are ignorant and vote counter to their self-interest. Nevertheless the correct analogy is ripping off a bandaid. If you have a working majority, use it.

  106. 106.

    Another Scott

    May 4, 2018 at 10:37 pm

    @Steve in the ATL: Pics or it didn’t happen.

    :-)

    Glad you and Subaru Diane got together. Fingers crossed for Mrs. in the ATL. Hang in there.

    Cheers,
    Scott.

  107. 107.

    Jeffro

    May 4, 2018 at 10:37 pm

    @Brickley Paiste: Government’s just the rule-setter…it’s up to the governed to decide who will be in charge, how they get there, and in what direction(s) they will tilt the rules.

  108. 108.

    ? ?? Goku (aka Amerikan Baka) ? ?

    May 4, 2018 at 10:38 pm

    @Jeffro:
    True, but it’s better than all of the other known alternatives. Concentrating power into the hands of one of a few is dangerous, as you know.

  109. 109.

    Bobby Thomson

    May 4, 2018 at 10:38 pm

    Shit, that’s not even the most important thing I read today.

    And these “what we need now are” arguments are just mental masturbation. I’ll just outsource it to Lin Manuel.

  110. 110.

    Baud

    May 4, 2018 at 10:38 pm

    @Brickley Paiste: That’s not really helpful though, as a predictive tool.

  111. 111.

    efgoldman

    May 4, 2018 at 10:39 pm

    @Villago Delenda Est:

    Include removing EVERY Donald appointment to the judiciary, to include Gorsuch

    Except for individual impeachments and removals, you know fucking right well there’s no constitutional remedy which accomplishes your goal.

  112. 112.

    tobie

    May 4, 2018 at 10:39 pm

    @Corner Stone:

    I think when the time comes for the avg worker to be laid off as they roll in mass automation, and no one has anything to say about it beyond platitudes of “job retraining”, we’re going to have some trouble.

    This. What labor will look like in the future is anyone’s guess, and not one of the current crop of populists–left or right–is addressing this question.

  113. 113.

    Steve in the ATL

    May 4, 2018 at 10:39 pm

    @Brickley Paiste: thank you—I am here to serve

    @? ?? Goku (aka Amerikan Baka) ? ?: you are making some really insightful comments tonight for a 22-year old girl

    @Omnes Omnibus: no better, but hoping results from tonight’s procedures will give us more insight

  114. 114.

    Brachiator

    May 4, 2018 at 10:41 pm

    What a load of bullshit. It’s like Bernie Bro loggorhrea. The country is being consumed by racist nativism. Women’s reproductive rights are being trampled in state after state. And what is the proposed current?

    For one, we need substantial redistribution, starting with marginal tax rates at the 70 percent levels that lasted until the Reagan-era cuts of the 1980s. For another, we need entirely new institutions of planning and social provision, such as universal family leave and child care to help make the economy more humane, family life less exhausting, and get closer to gender equity.

    It’s as though these people don’t even see Trump and the damage the Republicans are causing. They just keep on advocating the same shit they have always believed.

    The author also falls into the error of confusing marginal and effective tax rates that is typical of economy illiterates.

  115. 115.

    Corner Stone

    May 4, 2018 at 10:41 pm

    @? ?? Goku (aka Amerikan Baka) ? ?:

    And what happens when you can’t deliver? Look at the Republicans and the promises they’ve made to their base. Look what It’s gotten them. Further radicalization and anger over the last 20 years.

    I agree you need to excite voters, but you need to at least have some working theory of how your policies are going to be implemented. IOW, you can’t just make promises without knowing how your policies will work. You also can’t overpromise.

    34 State lege, both the Senate and House, the presidency, a majority in SCOTUS, a willy nilly confirming of Federal judges, unfettered cash and dark money in elections, voter suppression, mass incarceration of black folk, a destruction of public education, unprecedented debt levels for kids to go to higher education, record deficits, tax cuts that spiked the .01% of the wealthiest, Planned Parenthood defunded and abortion laws rolled back,a shellacking to the ACA…hmmmm. But yeah. Let’s lay out a comprehensive 400 page plan that addresses every single step we’re planning to take to help racist white people stay better than the best black people.
    Winner!

  116. 116.

    ? ?? Goku (aka Amerikan Baka) ? ?

    May 4, 2018 at 10:42 pm

    @efgoldman:
    It depends. If it’s feasible and can get the votes, I say go for it. All I’ve ever cared about is if it can work. However, isn’t making promises that can’t be kept partly contributed to the GOP’s rightward tilt?

  117. 117.

    Jeffro

    May 4, 2018 at 10:44 pm

    @? ?? Goku (aka Amerikan Baka) ? ?: Oh I agree completely that it’s better than all the others. It was just an observation, one that politicians ought to throw out there now and then, to help manage expectations. Probably only Dems would even come close to saying something like this, of course – the GOP likes the electorate dissatisfied with democracy.

  118. 118.

    ? ?? Goku (aka Amerikan Baka) ? ?

    May 4, 2018 at 10:46 pm

    @Corner Stone:

    Let’s lay out a comprehensive 400 page plan that addresses every single step we’re planning to take to help racist white people stay better than the best black people.

    When the fuck did I ever claim this? It’s important to have that plan in place but you don’t have to explain every little fucking detail in your campaign. Broadstrokes. The important thing is that you have done the work and can explain when asked. That’s it. This isn’t a zero-sum game and you’re ridiculous.

  119. 119.

    SiubhanDuinne

    May 4, 2018 at 10:46 pm

    Very much O/T: Sorry I can’t recall who it was, but someone in the last +/- 24 hours mentioned they had developed a recent allergic reaction to grilled eggplant.
    In the same timeframe, I’ve apparently developed a terrible skin allergy to one of Band-Aid®’s adhesives. A small infected spot on my arm has, after several hours of application of a Band-Aid® with Neosporin®, turned into a livid raging sensitive skinswamp — not actually at the site of the original wound, but in the whole area surrounding it where the adhesive touched. Ugly and itchy. Ugh.

  120. 120.

    Jay

    May 4, 2018 at 10:47 pm

    @Bobby Thomson:

    Yup, wanking.

  121. 121.

    Steve in the ATL

    May 4, 2018 at 10:48 pm

    @Another Scott: Subaru Diane, who actually drives an AMC Pacer, is every bit as fun and funny as clever as you would expect, plus she says things like “PRO-ject” to remind you how sophisticated and international she is

    @efgoldman: willing to go extra-judicial to solve a problem of this magnitude

    @? ?? Goku (aka Amerikan Baka) ? ?: universal basic income

  122. 122.

    Corner Stone

    May 4, 2018 at 10:49 pm

    @SiubhanDuinne: “Dear ER Forum, I never thought I would be writing to tell you something like this…”

  123. 123.

    Steve in the ATL

    May 4, 2018 at 10:49 pm

    @SiubhanDuinne: skin infection? Merde—I should have swiped left!

  124. 124.

    Jay

    May 4, 2018 at 10:50 pm

    @tobie:

    Grave diggers, lots and lots of grave diggers, it’s not skilled labour, but it will pay well.

  125. 125.

    Elizabelle

    May 4, 2018 at 10:51 pm

    @Steve in the ATL: LOL. A good time was had by all. Discretely. Goddamn discretely.

  126. 126.

    ? ?? Goku (aka Amerikan Baka) ? ?

    May 4, 2018 at 10:52 pm

    @Steve in the ATL:

    you are making some really insightful comments tonight for a 22-year old girl

    Thanks ;)

  127. 127.

    Brachiator

    May 4, 2018 at 10:53 pm

    @Another Scott:

    Maybe it’s addressed in the piece, but I don’t think that picking 70% because it was the rate in 1980 is a good reason. It was 91% under Eisenhower – why not 91%?

    Nobody ever paid taxes at a 91 percent rate. Nobody. The average effective rate was around 35 percent, and maybe a few paid 50 percent. But there were also quite a few ultra rich people who paid zero, zilch, nada, which is why the alternative minimum tax was introduced in the 1960s.

  128. 128.

    Steve in the ATL

    May 4, 2018 at 10:53 pm

    @SiubhanDuinne: allergic to grilled eggplant? That is an oddly specific and unlikely condition, reminiscent of Homer Simpson Syndrome. Are other grilled nightshades problematic as well?

  129. 129.

    Another Scott

    May 4, 2018 at 10:56 pm

    @SiubhanDuinne: Wasn’t me, and I didn’t see it, but I occasionally have oral allergy syndrome. In my case, when pollen levels are high, I can have reactions to carrots that I never have problems with otherwise. Pollen levels have been monstrously high recently up here in NoVA.

    I wouldn’t be surprised if just about everyone is “colonized” with MRSA on our skin these days. I’m convinced that I heal up much better and faster without band aids. Using them causes things to fester in ways that don’t happen when they’re covered. It didn’t use to be that way, but …

    Good luck!

    Cheers,
    Scott.

  130. 130.

    ET

    May 4, 2018 at 10:58 pm

    @? ?? Goku (aka Amerikan Baka) ? ?: sadly the country doesn’t really have a plan for when ALL of the Baby Boomers are not working, don’t have enough retirement funds to live, are racking up huge health care costs, and that many that will have costly/labor intensive illnesses like alzheimer’s. That is going to blow things up and soon. I think it will have devastating consequences that might lead to some big changes if people are paying attention but may only be possible if the current flavor of GOP is passe at all levels of government.

  131. 131.

    Millard Filmore

    May 4, 2018 at 11:03 pm

    @Villago Delenda Est:

    Include removing EVERY Donald appointment to the judiciary, to include Gorsuch.

    Gorsuch is the traitor’s Justice. He must go.

  132. 132.

    Villago Delenda Est

    May 4, 2018 at 11:07 pm

    @efgoldman: Yes, this is true. The problem of course is that the Constitution wasn’t constructed by madmen intent on destroying anything approaching a democratic republic, but instead ushering in industrial feudalism.

    Which is what the Federalist Society is all about.

  133. 133.

    Jay

    May 4, 2018 at 11:10 pm

    @Steve in the ATL:

    Allergic to green peppers, no other peppers, just green peppers.

  134. 134.

    efgoldman

    May 4, 2018 at 11:12 pm

    @Steve in the ATL:

    willing to go extra-judicial to solve a problem of this magnitude

    You’re willing to take on the entire Marshalls’ service, ATF, the FBI and local police?
    I don’t see any utility in that.

  135. 135.

    Jay

    May 4, 2018 at 11:14 pm

    @ET:

    See above, Gravediggers

  136. 136.

    NotMax

    May 4, 2018 at 11:26 pm

    @SiubhanDuinne

    Might – emphasize might – be a reaction to the latex. If a cloth band-aid isn’t readily available, see if instead using a small piece of gauze pad affixed with non-latex adhesive tape helps.

    As for the grilled eggplant thing (aware it wasn’t you), could be the culprit was contamination on the grill or the utensils used while grilling.

  137. 137.

    Corner Stone

    May 4, 2018 at 11:29 pm

    @SiubhanDuinne:

    Very much O/T: Sorry I can’t recall who it was, but someone in the last +/- 24 hours mentioned they had developed a recent allergic reaction to grilled eggplant.

    It was Spanky. Said it made his mouth itch. Didn’t seem to have any other ill effects so who knows?

  138. 138.

    J R in WV

    May 4, 2018 at 11:33 pm

    @SiubhanDuinne:

    I’m not acquainted with Jebediah Purdy – but I suspect his name is actually Jedediah Purdy. He grew up home schooled in Chloe, WV on a farm, and went straight from home-schooled to Harvard, and is now a professor of law at Duke.

  139. 139.

    Citizen Alan

    May 4, 2018 at 11:38 pm

    @Corner Stone:

    The good utilities are socialized. The privatized ones are all run like the mafia.

  140. 140.

    Corner Stone

    May 4, 2018 at 11:42 pm

    @? ?? Goku (aka Amerikan Baka) ? ?:

    The important thing is that you have done the work and can explain when asked. That’s it. This isn’t a zero-sum game and you’re ridiculous.

    You have no idea what you are talking about. Elections are the ultimate zero sum game, you fucking imbecile. Explain what? And to who? This mamby pamby bullshit you seem to be pushing this evening is the ridiculous line.

  141. 141.

    cgordon

    May 4, 2018 at 11:49 pm

    “whether the versions of capitalism that have emerged in the last forty years are compatible with democracy”

    They are not. Read, for one, “Can Democracy Survive Global Capitalism?” by Robert Kuttner. We’ll either get an FDR or a smart Trump (Putin).

  142. 142.

    Omnes Omnibus

    May 4, 2018 at 11:51 pm

    @Corner Stone: Come on, leave the kid alone.

    And now for the attack on me.

  143. 143.

    Corner Stone

    May 4, 2018 at 11:58 pm

    @Omnes Omnibus: I’ll have some good ones lined up by Wednesday.

  144. 144.

    Villago Delenda Est

    May 4, 2018 at 11:59 pm

    @efgoldman: If you’ve got all those agencies on your side, it makes it much easier. Making a case to get rid of crooks, liars, and thieves will go a long way to doing that.

    We are in extraordinary and interesting (in the ancient Chinese curse sense) times.

  145. 145.

    Citizen Alan

    May 4, 2018 at 11:59 pm

    @M. Bouffant:

    Marx’s mistake was failing to recognize that Capital has a sense of self-preservation and js perfectly willing to adopt limited social welfare that applied to just enough people to create a working majority and keep everyone else suppressed. The capitalist response to Das Kapital can be summed up in 14 words from Jay Gould.

    I can hire one half of the working class to kill the other half.

  146. 146.

    Villago Delenda Est

    May 5, 2018 at 12:02 am

    Totally OT, but worth a look. Bryan Fischer says non-Christians have no First Amendment Rights.

    Madison would kick his fucking ass.

  147. 147.

    Brachiator

    May 5, 2018 at 12:10 am

    @Villago Delenda Est:

    Totally OT, but worth a look. Bryan Fischer says non-Christians have no First Amendment Rights.

    Jesus, Mary and Mohammed, what a dope.

    These nutcases feel especially emboldened now that Trump is their president.

  148. 148.

    Citizen Alan

    May 5, 2018 at 12:11 am

    @Jeffro:

    There’s a much simpler way to do it. Calculate how productive automated factories are compared to human workers, and then tax the companies for an amount equal to what they would have paid on behalf of workers for SS taxes and on what their former employees would have paid in income taxes had they not automated. Then use that money for welfare spending for people who can’t get jobs.

  149. 149.

    ? ?? Goku (aka Amerikan Baka) ? ?

    May 5, 2018 at 12:20 am

    @Corner Stone:
    Go fuck yourself, you fucking asshole. You knew what I meant. I meant you were presenting a false dilemma with your asinine argument; is it that controversial to say you should know what the fuck you’re talking about? You’re talk of “600 page comprehensive plans” is what is ridiculous.

    But you do you, prick. You sure knocked down that straw man.

  150. 150.

    M. Bouffant

    May 5, 2018 at 12:36 am

    @B.B.A.: Zackly. Last two Dems to win the Electoral College along w/ the popular vote were forty-somethings Clinton & Obama.

  151. 151.

    Corner Stone

    May 5, 2018 at 12:38 am

    @? ?? Goku (aka Amerikan Baka) ? ?: Sorry, and I apologize. I thought you meant what you said. My bad.

  152. 152.

    Sab

    May 5, 2018 at 12:48 am

    @? ?? Goku (aka Amerikan Baka) ? ?: Calm down. He’s just being a curmudeon. It’s what we olds do. You are our future, so you probably should mostly ignore us and get on with your life (except occasionally some of us actually have learned something from experience.) Your challenge is to figure out which old knows something, and which are just ranting.

    I suggest consult the not olds, like Adam

  153. 153.

    Corner Stone

    May 5, 2018 at 12:53 am

    @Sab: Who the fuck are you talking about?

  154. 154.

    patroclus

    May 5, 2018 at 1:03 am

    Mandatory unionization? No thank you. Marginal rates at 70%? No thank you I like Medicare for all and free college and expanded reciprocal trade and investment in green technology and a massive infrastructure program and marijuana legalization better as campaign issues. Plus enforcement of women’s liberty rights, less restrictive immigration laws, a Dreamer fix and expanded and enforced equal protection of the laws for minorities. No more Wilmer or Wilmer-like supposed solutions please.

  155. 155.

    Vhh

    May 5, 2018 at 1:14 am

    @Mary G: Read about the Supreme Court in the time of FDR. One justice refused to appear in group court photos because he could not stand being seen with Brandeis, who was Jewish. They were pissed because Congress lowered their pensions, so they tried to kill the New Deal,and FDR tried to increase the Court size to pack it. Under pressure, they relented.

  156. 156.

    chopper

    May 5, 2018 at 1:21 am

    @? ?? Goku (aka Amerikan Baka) ? ?:

    Define “tepid centrism”. I’ll be waiting.

    you just did.

  157. 157.

    schrodingers_cat

    May 5, 2018 at 9:21 am

    @Jay: I was talking about the economy not an individual circumstance. Even in a great economy some people will still be struggling. HRC had the most labor friendly economic agenda of all candidates in the last election. I do agree that we need to support more labor friendly economic policies but I see no proof that the electorate is waiting to be rescued by a left wing Messiah.

  158. 158.

    The Other Chuck

    May 5, 2018 at 11:58 pm

    @efgoldman: Given VDE’s typical rhetoric, I think he advocates simply murdering them.

Comments are closed.

Primary Sidebar

On The Road -  ?BillinGlendaleCA - Gold! 1
Image by BillinGlendaleCA (5/10/25)

Recent Comments

  • Geoduck on Wednesday Night Open Thread (May 14, 2025 @ 8:22pm)
  • prostratedragon on Wednesday Night Open Thread (May 14, 2025 @ 8:21pm)
  • Bupalos on Brief Media Note (Open Thread) (May 14, 2025 @ 8:21pm)
  • Dr Daniel Price (Saint Vincent) on On The Road – frosty – 2024 National Park Road Trip – Canada (1/3) Banff (May 14, 2025 @ 8:20pm)
  • Percysowner on Wednesday Night Open Thread (May 14, 2025 @ 8:19pm)

PA Supreme Court At Risk

Donate

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
War in Ukraine
Donate to Razom for Ukraine

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

Meetups

Upcoming Ohio Meetup May 17
5/11 Post about the May 17 Ohio Meetup

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)
Fix Nyms with Apostrophes

Hands Off! – Denver, San Diego & Austin

Social Media

Balloon Juice
WaterGirl
TaMara
John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
David Anderson
Major Major Major Major
DougJ NYT Pitchbot
mistermix

Keeping Track

Legal Challenges (Lawfare)
Republicans Fleeing Town Halls (TPM)
21 Letters (to Borrow or Steal)
Search Donations from a Brand

PA Supreme Court At Risk

Donate

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2025 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!