Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

Is it negotiation when the other party actually wants to shoot the hostage?

The republican caucus is already covering themselves with something, and it’s not glory.

This blog will pay for itself.

Perhaps you mistook them for somebody who gives a damn.

I’m pretty sure there’s only one Jack Smith.

They are lying in pursuit of an agenda.

Let’s delete this post and never speak of this again.

Their freedom requires your slavery.

No offense, but this thread hasn’t been about you for quite a while.

Just because you believe it, that doesn’t make it true.

Impressively dumb. Congratulations.

T R E 4 5 O N

They’re not red states to be hated; they are voter suppression states to be fixed.

Russian mouthpiece, go fuck yourself.

Infrastructure week. at last.

I really should read my own blog.

Incompetence, fear, or corruption? why not all three?

It’s always darkest before the other shoe drops.

That’s my take and I am available for criticism at this time.

Nancy smash is sick of your bullshit.

You don’t get to peddle hatred on saturday and offer condolences on sunday.

JFC, are there no editors left at that goddamn rag?

New McCarthy, same old McCarthyism.

Republican obstruction dressed up as bipartisanship. Again.

You are here: Home / Science & Technology / Space / Another SpaceX Launch

Another SpaceX Launch

by | 10 Comments

This post is in: 

About 3:47 Eastern, SpaceX is launching another rocket. This is an already-used-once Block 4 version, so it will not return to land. They are, though, going to try to recover 1/2 of the payload fairing, hoping to catch it with a small boat in the Pacific. Should be fun, if slow.

 

They are launching some satellites, two scientific and five Iridium satellites for the NEXT constellation.

 

 

Reader Interactions

10Comments

  2. 2.

    SiubhanDuinne

    Thank you, Alain. After all these decades, I never tire of watching launches.

  4. 4.

    rikyrah

    Lowdown, nogood muthaphuckas!

    Trump spending cuts allowed to target kids’ health insurance
    By SARAH FERRIS 05/22/2018 11:03 AM EDT

    The Government Accountability Office on Tuesday delivered a victory to the Trump administration by greenlighting a proposal to claw back more than $7 billion in unused cash from the Children’s Health Insurance Program.

    In a report sent to congressional offices Tuesday morning, the GAO approved the vast majority of the administration’s $15.3 billion plan to cancel spending.

    With that legal approval, the White House’s plan for so-called rescissions will likely retain its filibuster-proof powers in the GOP-controlled Senate, easing the way for potential passage with a simple majority vote.

    Democrats have argued that the White House’s attempt to target CHIP — a mandatory spending program for kids’ health coverage — should disqualify it from that procedural advantage.

    One problem found by the GAO is related to a pair of Department of Transportation highway trust fund accounts, which the Trump administration proposed to cut by a total of $133 million.

    The GAO said that the Trump administration did not have authority to withhold funds from certain projects because the DOT secretary “has no discretion over the obligation of funds provided for the specified projects,” GAO wrote in its report.

    The House has already drafted legislation mirroring the White House’s request, which is expected to receive a House floor vote in June.

    Senate GOP leaders have not said whether they would take up an identical bill. Several senators, including Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska) and Susan Collins (R-Maine), have raised issues with the Trump administration’s package, including the cuts to CHIP.

    In the Senate, a single Republican “no” vote likely would be enough to sink the package. Democrats are expected to unanimously oppose the bill in both chambers.

  7. 7.

    Just One More Canuck

    @TenguPhule: In order for there to be ‘extreme levels of zombie activity’, there has to be a regular, normal level of zombie activity

Comments are closed.