Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

I like political parties that aren’t owned by foreign adversaries.

I’ve spoken to my cat about this, but it doesn’t seem to do any good.

“I was told there would be no fact checking.”

Their freedom requires your slavery.

I swear, each month of 2025 will have its own history degree.

Quote tweet friends, screenshot enemies.

Seems like a complicated subject, have you tried yelling at it?

Today’s gop: why go just far enough when too far is right there?

It’s all just conspiracy shit beamed down from the mothership.

We do not need to pander to people who do not like what we stand for.

Why is it so hard for them to condemn hate?

Democracy is not a spectator sport.

I desperately hope that, yet again, i am wrong.

Russian mouthpiece, go fuck yourself.

Imperialist aggressors must be defeated, or the whole world loses.

Nothing says ‘pro-life’ like letting children go hungry.

Good lord, these people are nuts.

You’re just a puppy masquerading as an old coot.

Petty moves from a petty man.

A fool as well as an oath-breaker.

That’s my take and I am available for criticism at this time.

How any woman could possibly vote for this smug smarmy piece of misogynistic crap is beyond understanding.

Bad people in a position to do bad things will do bad things because they are bad people. End of story.

This is dead girl, live boy, a goat, two wetsuits and a dildo territory.  oh, and pink furry handcuffs.

You are here: Home / Science & Technology / Space / Another SpaceX Launch

Another SpaceX Launch

by | 10 Comments

This post is in: 

About 3:47 Eastern, SpaceX is launching another rocket. This is an already-used-once Block 4 version, so it will not return to land. They are, though, going to try to recover 1/2 of the payload fairing, hoping to catch it with a small boat in the Pacific. Should be fun, if slow.

 

They are launching some satellites, two scientific and five Iridium satellites for the NEXT constellation.

 

 

Reader Interactions

10Comments

  2. 2.

    SiubhanDuinne

    Thank you, Alain. After all these decades, I never tire of watching launches.

  4. 4.

    rikyrah

    Lowdown, nogood muthaphuckas!

    Trump spending cuts allowed to target kids’ health insurance
    By SARAH FERRIS 05/22/2018 11:03 AM EDT

    The Government Accountability Office on Tuesday delivered a victory to the Trump administration by greenlighting a proposal to claw back more than $7 billion in unused cash from the Children’s Health Insurance Program.

    In a report sent to congressional offices Tuesday morning, the GAO approved the vast majority of the administration’s $15.3 billion plan to cancel spending.

    With that legal approval, the White House’s plan for so-called rescissions will likely retain its filibuster-proof powers in the GOP-controlled Senate, easing the way for potential passage with a simple majority vote.

    Democrats have argued that the White House’s attempt to target CHIP — a mandatory spending program for kids’ health coverage — should disqualify it from that procedural advantage.

    One problem found by the GAO is related to a pair of Department of Transportation highway trust fund accounts, which the Trump administration proposed to cut by a total of $133 million.

    The GAO said that the Trump administration did not have authority to withhold funds from certain projects because the DOT secretary “has no discretion over the obligation of funds provided for the specified projects,” GAO wrote in its report.

    The House has already drafted legislation mirroring the White House’s request, which is expected to receive a House floor vote in June.

    Senate GOP leaders have not said whether they would take up an identical bill. Several senators, including Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska) and Susan Collins (R-Maine), have raised issues with the Trump administration’s package, including the cuts to CHIP.

    In the Senate, a single Republican “no” vote likely would be enough to sink the package. Democrats are expected to unanimously oppose the bill in both chambers.

  7. 7.

    Just One More Canuck

    @TenguPhule: In order for there to be ‘extreme levels of zombie activity’, there has to be a regular, normal level of zombie activity

Comments are closed.