• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

It’s always darkest before the other shoe drops.

Peak wingnut was a lie.

I like you, you’re my kind of trouble.

Wow, you are pre-disappointed. How surprising.

Pessimism assures that nothing of any importance will change.

This blog will pay for itself.

fuckem (in honor of the late great efgoldman)

But frankly mr. cole, I’ll be happier when you get back to telling us to go fuck ourselves.

🎶 Those boots were made for mockin’ 🎵

Putin must be throwing ketchup at the walls.

Prediction: the GOP will rethink its strategy of boycotting future committees.

We are builders in a constant struggle with destroyers. let’s win this.

Tick tock motherfuckers!

A last alliance of elves and men. also pet photos.

Let us savor the impending downfall of lawless scoundrels who richly deserve the trouble barreling their way.

Imperialist aggressors must be defeated, or the whole world loses.

If you are still in the GOP, you are an extremist.

It may be funny to you motherfucker, but it’s not funny to me.

Not so fun when the rabbit gets the gun, is it?

Nancy smash is sick of your bullshit.

The words do not have to be perfect.

The next time the wall street journal editorial board speaks the truth will be the first.

Something needs to be done about our bogus SCOTUS.

No one could have predicted…

Mobile Menu

  • Winnable House Races
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • Balloon Juice 2023 Pet Calendar (coming soon)
  • COVID-19 Coronavirus
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • War in Ukraine
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • 2021-22 Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Anderson On Health Insurance / Predicting the future of the ACA is hard

Predicting the future of the ACA is hard

by David Anderson|  August 3, 20186:48 am| 5 Comments

This post is in: Anderson On Health Insurance, Election 2018

FacebookTweetEmail

A couple of days ago P.A. asked a good question in comments:

but can you (David) discern any meta for the ACA over the near term (3-ish years)? The sabotage doesn’t seem to be working currently, but is the foundation sturdy, or in future danger given current design? (In effect not asking you to crystal ball future rethug sapper efforts)

This is highly conditional on the midterms.

If, on January 4, 2019, there are 53 Republican Senators and 228 Republican House members, then we’ll most likely get something that looks a lot like Graham-Cassidy with block grants and major Medicaid cuts. I am clueless as to what a 52 GOP Senate, 218 GOP House looks like in 2019 on health policy.

If the next Congress has a Democratic House, then we muddle through until at least 2022, if not 2023 as the best case scenario of a Democratic trifecta would need eighteen months or more to implement any new major legislation. If there is a split government, then we get more muddling through.

Let’s work with the assumption that there is a Democratic House in 2019.  At this point, the ACA will be a patchwork quilt.  It will work well in some states.  It will be a mess in other states for anyone who is not getting a significant subsidy.  I don’t think we should be too worried about bare counties.  I think that enough insurers and regulators realize that a single insurer region is a gold mine of federal subsidy money.

States will continue to apply for and have 1332 reinsurance waivers approved.  I think blue states will be tying their reinsurance waivers to the funding generated by state level individual mandates.  States that don’t want to go down the individual mandate route will use small amounts of state funding to seed their waivers.

I think SilverLoading may be gone in 2020.  This will make almost everyone no better off and many people worse off.  CSRs will never be funded.  CSR incremental costs will be borne by broad-loading.

I expect more states to start moving to their own exchanges or regional exchanges.  HC.Gov is currently not a good partner as they charge a percentage of premium instead of a flat fee and as premiums have gone up, outreach has gone down.  Enough state based marketplaces have stable software platforms that there are effectively plug and play exchange deals available.  State based exchanges also enable far more complex waivers than simple reinsurance.

I think structurally the ACA can and will get to an equilibrium where its subsidy structure protects the individual market at least as a very well funded high cost risk pool for the 100-400% FPL population.  All of the outs (Farm Bureau, Short Term Plans, no individual mandate) will raise premiums.  Folks who are healthy and risk tolerant enough to take those outs will see lower costs.  The people who are worse off and will continue to be worse off are the folks who can not pass underwriting and who make too much for subsidies.

But conditional on a Democratic House, I think muddling through is a plausible pathway.

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « Friday Morning Open Thread
Next Post: Low IQ Anonsense (Open Thread) »

Reader Interactions

5Comments

  1. 1.

    Zinsky

    August 3, 2018 at 7:06 am

    David, it isn’t difficult to predict the ACA’s future – it’s DEAD! It was killed by the treachery of the Republican Party and a repulsive, ignorant sex offender named Donald Trump. The American people need to be reminded of this everyday. The Democrats need a message that says, “if you can’t afford health insurance or you don’t like your current coverage or if you can’t get health insurance at all, blame the GOP!” Every grievance surrounding health care needs to be stapled to the back of the Republican Party!

  2. 2.

    David Anderson

    August 3, 2018 at 7:09 am

    @Zinsky:
    Politically that might be so.

    Plumbing wise it is not the case on Medicaid expansion and <400% FPL individual market.

  3. 3.

    rikyrah

    August 3, 2018 at 7:28 am

    We must defeat them. They are evil people who want to take away healthcare for millions.??

  4. 4.

    Mary G

    August 3, 2018 at 11:36 am

    One of the reasons that the Republican Party fought the ACA and earlier efforts so hard was that they knew how much people would like it and want to keep the relative security/peace of mind that having even imperfect insurance brings. Obama and Pelosi and Reid got the foot wedged in the door and it’s not closing again. Look at how the polling has changed. It might not be the ACA, and it may take a decade, but we’re going to have something.

  5. 5.

    StringOnAStick

    August 3, 2018 at 1:20 pm

    @Mary G: That was what I said to our two Canadian friends right after the ACA passed, that no matter what, having gotten the right to coverage passed that there would be no going back once it was established. It’s looking wobbly now for some of us (the non subsidized, better off cohort). The husband was shocked at how extreme the opposition was and how hard the US RW fought the passage of the ACA; I pointed out that it had been pretty hard fought in Canada too, but that was before he was born so he missed all the excitement. The first time the 4 of us met we had been asked over dinner to explain the US healthcare system (this was pre-Obama). I explained it, he looked shocked and said “that’s insane”.

    As an aside, I noted that I knew something was up because once it was clear the ACA would pass, the opposition just plain stopped. I knew then that they were going to go for a nibbled to death response, and here we are. My husband and I saw the passage of the ACA as an eventual ticket to job freedom for us, but once we knew the results of the 2016 election, we knew we couldn’t take the risk of putting ourselves in the position of buying our own insurance.

Comments are closed.

Primary Sidebar

Fundraising 2023-24

Wis*Dems Supreme Court + SD-8

Recent Comments

  • Juju on American Has Turned Upside Down (Mar 28, 2023 @ 10:24am)
  • Spanish Moss on Squishable Early Morning Open Thread (Mar 28, 2023 @ 10:23am)
  • CaseyL on Spending distribution of low income ACA enrollees (Mar 28, 2023 @ 10:22am)
  • montanareddog on Squishable Early Morning Open Thread (Mar 28, 2023 @ 10:21am)
  • Dr. Jakyll and Miss Deride on American Has Turned Upside Down (Mar 28, 2023 @ 10:18am)

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
We All Need A Little Kindness
Classified Documents: A Primer
State & Local Elections Discussion

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Mailing List Signup
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)

Twitter / Spoutible

Balloon Juice (Spoutible)
WaterGirl (Spoutible)
TaMara (Spoutible)
John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
TaMara
David Anderson
Major Major Major Major
ActualCitizensUnited

Join the Fight!

Join the Fight Signup Form
All Join the Fight Posts

Balloon Juice Events

5/14  The Apocalypse
5/20  Home Away from Home
5/29  We’re Back, Baby
7/21  Merging!

Balloon Juice for Ukraine

Donate

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2023 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!