• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

A democracy can’t function when people can’t distinguish facts from lies.

Hell hath no fury like a farmer bankrupted.

Republicans: slavery is when you own me. freedom is when I own you.

Republicans: The threats are dire, but my tickets are non-refundable!

The way to stop violence is to stop manufacturing the hatred that fuels it.

Republicans in disarray!

Sadly, media malpractice has become standard practice.

The republican ‘Pastor’ of the House is an odious authoritarian little creep.

The words do not have to be perfect.

The desire to stay informed is directly at odds with the need to not be constantly enraged.

“woke” is the new caravan.

An almost top 10,000 blog!

Dear Washington Post, you are the darkness now.

Giving in to doom is how authoritarians win.

You know it’s bad when the Project 2025 people have to create training videos on “How To Be Normal”.

Fight them, without becoming them!

GOP baffled that ‘we don’t care if you die’ is not a winning slogan.

Nancy smash is sick of your bullshit.

But frankly mr. cole, I’ll be happier when you get back to telling us to go fuck ourselves.

The low info voters probably won’t even notice or remember by their next lap around the goldfish bowl.

Let the trolls come, and then ignore them. that’s the worst thing you can do to a troll.

Hey Washington Post, “Democracy Dies in Darkness” was supposed to be a warning, not a mission statement.

This is dead girl, live boy, a goat, two wetsuits and a dildo territory.  oh, and pink furry handcuffs.

Every decision we make has lots of baggage with it, known or unknown.

Mobile Menu

  • 4 Directions VA 2025 Raffle
  • 2025 Activism
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • 2025 Activism
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • Targeted Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Open Threads / Trump Triples Down on Kavanaugh

Trump Triples Down on Kavanaugh

by Betty Cracker|  September 24, 20189:45 am| 98 Comments

This post is in: Open Threads, Politics, Republican Stupidity, The War On Women, Women's Rights Are Human Rights, Assholes, General Stupidity

FacebookTweetEmail

Skulking around the UN building and looking for an opportunity to embarrass us on the global stage yet again, Trump commented on the Kavanaugh controversy:

pic.twitter.com/a0jqzHMmxm

— TPM Livewire (@TPMLiveWire) September 24, 2018

A written account of the remarks for those who can’t bear to hear Trump’s snuffling, sneering delivery:

President Donald Trump on Monday affirmed his continuing support for Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh despite the second allegation of sexual misconduct against him that surfaced Sunday, saying that it’s “unfair,” “unjust” and “totally political.”

“He is a fine man with an unblemished past and these are highly unsubstantiated statements from people represented by lawyers,” Trump said on the sidelines of an event at the United Nations. “We should look into the lawyers doing the representation. Judge Kavanaugh is an outstanding person, and I am with him all the way.”

“There’s a chance that this could be one of the single most unfair, unjust things to happen to a candidate for anything but I am with Judge Kavanaugh and I look forward to a vote,” Trump continued. “For people to come out of the woodwork from 36 years ago and 30 years ago and never mention it, all of a sudden it happens, in my opinion, it’s totally political.”

This is a nightmare scenario for the GOP no matter what they do, IMO. If Kavanaugh withdraws or the nomination otherwise fails, the evangelical hypocrites will pitch an ear-splitting hissy fit. I’ve rarely seen them so dug in on an issue.

If Kavanaugh is seated despite credible allegations of sexual assault, non-brainwashed women will rightly see it as an elite old boy’s club — led by a leering, highly unpopular degenerate who will no doubt continue to say offensive things — closing ranks around one of their own miscreants.

One way or another, they seem very eager to die on this hill.

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « On the Road and In Your Backyard
Next Post: Class notes on CSR strangeness »

Reader Interactions

98Comments

  1. 1.

    Nicole

    September 24, 2018 at 9:50 am

    I think they are desperate to get someone seated who will say a President can’t be indicted. This is all about dismantling the rule of law. Roe v Wade getting overturned is just gravy for them.

  2. 2.

    Chyron HR

    September 24, 2018 at 9:50 am

    You’re damn right it’s political. One party is loudly and proudly the Rape Party.

  3. 3.

    Jay C

    September 24, 2018 at 9:54 am

    One way or another, they seem very eager to die on this hill.

    It IS strange: Even given that no President or Party likes to lose a high-profile nomination like this (lurid allegations notwithstanding), the Admin, GOP, and its various enablers seem obsessed with getting Brett Kavanaugh on the High Court, even though it’s a certainty that the Federalist Society will have some suitable judicial drone/clone to proffer in his place. Maybe it’s Kavanaugh’s well-articulated views on Presidential Immunity??

  4. 4.

    NotMax

    September 24, 2018 at 9:54 am

    Rhymes with brojection.

    these are highly unsubstantiated statements from people represented by lawyers

    Apt description of senior White House staff.

    We should look into the lawyers doing the representation.

    Rudy G., come on down!

  5. 5.

    Betty Cracker

    September 24, 2018 at 9:55 am

    @Nicole: Bingo.

  6. 6.

    condorcet runner-up

    September 24, 2018 at 9:55 am

    We should look into the lawyers doing the representation

    The bloated chucklehead also ended up steamrolling yet another institution as a throwaway line. People should not be viewed with skepticism just for the act of retaining counsel.

  7. 7.

    PJ

    September 24, 2018 at 9:59 am

    @condorcet runner-up: Unless their lawyer is Michael Cohen.

  8. 8.

    jonas

    September 24, 2018 at 9:59 am

    @Nicole:

    I think they are desperate to get someone seated who will say a President can’t be indicted.

    It’s a moot point if Dems take Congress and have the power to impeach and remove from office. I think Kavanaugh’s more important to the conservative movement for the labor, environmental, and voting laws he’d cheerfully gut if given the opportunity. The prospect of overturning Roe v. Wade is just to keep the Christian rubes in line.

  9. 9.

    schrodingers_cat

    September 24, 2018 at 10:00 am

    Twitter is swarming with Russian botlets about Special K.

  10. 10.

    Elizabelle

    September 24, 2018 at 10:00 am

    der Trump:

    “There’s a chance that this could be one of the single most unfair, unjust things to happen to a candidate for anything …

    Merrick Garland, anybody? STFU, DJT.

  11. 11.

    Yutsano

    September 24, 2018 at 10:00 am

    @Nicole: Give the lovely lady a cigar! Kavanaugh is their guy because of his judicial philosophy towards “inconveniencing” Republican presidents. Not Democratic ones: they can be subpoenaed at will. He’s nothing more than a party hack who happened to get a robe on the DC Circuit of Appeals.

  12. 12.

    NotMax

    September 24, 2018 at 10:01 am

    Polls before Dr. Ford came forward (weeks before) showed Kavanaugh’s support among women at 28%.

    I expect any similar polls today would shatter the magic 27% into smithereens.

  13. 13.

    LAO

    September 24, 2018 at 10:02 am

    As expected, Manhattan is a shit show this am. I fucking hate UN week.

  14. 14.

    OzarkHillbilly

    September 24, 2018 at 10:04 am

    I think whether Kavanaugh is seated or not, non-brainwashed women will rightly see it as an elite old boy’s club — led by a leering, highly unpopular degenerate who will no doubt continue to say offensive things — closing ranks around one of their own miscreants, and that we will begin to see more than a few cracks in the facades of the brainwashed.

    One way or another, they seem very eager to die on this hill.

    And I think women will be all to happy to pull the trigger. I for one will be all too happy to let them.

  15. 15.

    Nicole

    September 24, 2018 at 10:04 am

    @jonas:

    I think Kavanaugh’s more important to the conservative movement for the labor, environmental, and voting laws he’d cheerfully gut if given the opportunity.

    He’s certainly be useful for that, too:

    prospect.org/article/seaworld-and-kavanaugh%E2%80%99s-missing-empathy-gene

  16. 16.

    Tim C.

    September 24, 2018 at 10:04 am

    Some questions I have in no particular order.

    * Why are the fundamentalists so locked into this particular nominee? I’m sure they could find a Gorsch/Alito clone with no particular offensive personal traits.

    * Will the same fundamentalists really throw a fit if they are denied this? I’m not saying they wont for sure, but they had no problem voting for Trump, so I’m not sure any of their stated beliefs matter as much as they like being the in-power group and hurting people.

    * While it would be fast, if they just chose one of the other potential nominees (In particular, a woman) They could push it through in a month easy, That’s fast for the Senate, and Democrats will scream, but it would still happen before the election and might make them look reasonable.

  17. 17.

    zhena gogolia

    September 24, 2018 at 10:04 am

    @condorcet runner-up:

    This reminds me of my developer neighbor (RIP) who would show up at every P&Z meeting with his lawyer. Then when we hired an attorney who proved that the developer was breaking the law with his planned three houses right behind our house, when I saw him next he sneered at me, “You hired a lawyer! You’re my neighbor and you hired a lawyer against me!” I guess his lawyer didn’t count because he was his lawyer.

  18. 18.

    PJ

    September 24, 2018 at 10:04 am

    @jonas: Even if Democrats take the House, there will not be enough Senate Republicans who will turn against Trump to get him convicted, so in no way is it a moot point. The only real possibility of removing Trump before 2020 – and it is a long shot, given the legal battles ahead – is for him to be indicted, which might convince enough Republicans to abandon him. If they do not, and Trump is convicted in a criminal court, then we will have the first Presidency operating from behind bars.

  19. 19.

    Nicole

    September 24, 2018 at 10:04 am

    Ugh. “He’d.” This is what I get for not proofreading before I hit “post comment.”

  20. 20.

    NotMax

    September 24, 2018 at 10:05 am

    @LAO

    Stick to the west side. Below 34th Street or above 59th.

    :)

  21. 21.

    Jerzy Russian

    September 24, 2018 at 10:06 am

    Even without all of these credible accusations of sexual assaults, this judge should not be a judge if he thinks a calendar kept by an alledged felon that fails to mention the alledged crimes constitutes evidence of innocence. Also too, the fact that he bragged about the “deliberation” that went into his nomination.

  22. 22.

    OzarkHillbilly

    September 24, 2018 at 10:07 am

    @Chyron HR: Hmmmm….. Republican and Rape both begin with an “R”. Accident?

  23. 23.

    LAO

    September 24, 2018 at 10:09 am

    @NotMax: Or, I could escape to paradise like some other, unnamed people. Hmm.

  24. 24.

    joel hanes

    September 24, 2018 at 10:09 am

    @Tim C.:

    Why are the fundamentalists so locked into this particular nominee?

    Authoritarian followers. Attacks on a member of the tribe increase the intensity of defensive tribal affiliation.

  25. 25.

    Immanentize

    September 24, 2018 at 10:09 am

    Just a reminder about Clarence Thomas. The Senate was much more divided (although not entirely divided) regarding that confirmation than they are about Kavanaugh. The Democrats could have filibustered Thomas’ nomination, but chose not to:

    Voting yes were 11 Democrats and 41 Republicans. Voting no were 46 Democrats and 2 Republicans.

    In this way, Thomas was cleaned up for the Court and his place on it.

    Kavanaugh will not be cleaned up in any way, should he win confirmation.

  26. 26.

    Yutsano

    September 24, 2018 at 10:10 am

    @Jerzy Russian: The flailing is real.

  27. 27.

    Droppy

    September 24, 2018 at 10:10 am

    I am surprised, but shouldn’t be given that Republicans/conservatives always focus only on the short-term, that they didn’t dump Kavanaugh immediately upon realizing there were going to be sex-related allegations and immediately nominate Amy Coney Barrett from their short list – the only skeletons in her closet would be anti-women, anti-minorities, pro-business opinions and activities. She would sail through and they’d get the same rulings they would have had with K.

  28. 28.

    Immanentize

    September 24, 2018 at 10:10 am

    @Tim C.: Why did the Evangelicals continue their support fro Roy Moore/

  29. 29.

    Gin & Tonic

    September 24, 2018 at 10:11 am

    they seem very eager to die on this hill.

    This sounds like an acceptable outcome to me.

  30. 30.

    James E Powell

    September 24, 2018 at 10:11 am

    One way or another, they seem very eager to die on this hill.

    I think it’s got something to do with being seen as The Winner! and owning the libtards. A significant part of GOP support comes from the fact that they get what they want. The Village especially but the entire press/media world generally approves of and supports whoever “wins” – they report almost nothing else.

    It’s a shame that the only thing that might bring Kavanaugh down is the sexual misconduct. We don’t get to debate the fact that he is a right wing radical whose intent is to use the supreme court to transform the country in ways that are not supported by the majority of Americans, many of whom have no idea what or how about the supreme court’s impact on their lives.

    538’s poll averages show an uptick in support for both Trump and the Republicans. Their voters are rallying. They hate us more than they love Trump.

  31. 31.

    BroD

    September 24, 2018 at 10:11 am

    “people represented by lawyers” are just the worst–amirite?

  32. 32.

    Immanentize

    September 24, 2018 at 10:12 am

    @zhena gogolia: That is such a good story — I may tell my students that one today.

  33. 33.

    Gin & Tonic

    September 24, 2018 at 10:12 am

    @LAO: OGG-LGA is a *long* commute.

  34. 34.

    zhena gogolia

    September 24, 2018 at 10:12 am

    I just want to put this here, because the thread below is pretty dead. Someone suggested that Jane Mayer is tagging along with the great man Ronan Farrow, who was the sole reporter to break the Weinstein story. Jane Mayer and Jill Abramson published the definitive investigation of Clarence Thomas in 1994, and the Weinstein story was broken by a group of women reporters at the New York Times.

  35. 35.

    TS (the original)

    September 24, 2018 at 10:12 am

    @Nicole:

    I think they are desperate to get someone seated who will say a President can’t be indicted

    They are just desperate to get someone seated. Polling is not good, they could lose the senate and time is running out.

  36. 36.

    terraformer

    September 24, 2018 at 10:14 am

    Funny how they always refer to “lawyers” as necessarily bad and worthy of contempt. And yet, a sizable number of politicians are themselves lawyers.

    Obviously, just another whistle to the mouth-breathers about someone else who is an “elite” sneering down on them, instead of the thin line representing the rule of law that keeps society civil instead of murdering each other in the streets over arguments.

  37. 37.

    Betty Cracker

    September 24, 2018 at 10:15 am

    @Tim C.: I think it’s a Cleek’s Law thing for the talibangelicals now — they’re locked in on Kavanaugh to own the libs. That’s not to say they wouldn’t rally around another Fed Society drone like Amy Coney Barrett. I think the evangelicals like her even more for her overt piety. But if Kavanaugh flames out, it’s a loss for them and a victory for the feminazis, and they find the prospect unbearable.

    For the Trump people, I think it’s what Nicole said above — they really want Kavanaugh because he’s said Republican presidents shouldn’t be bothered with legal issues.

  38. 38.

    James E Powell

    September 24, 2018 at 10:16 am

    @zhena gogolia:

    Americans are conditioned by the propaganda effect of decades of TV shows and movies in which the police use the phrase “lawyered up” scornfully and consider it an admission of wrong-doing. And they never mention that the government is always “lawyered up.”

  39. 39.

    schrodingers_cat

    September 24, 2018 at 10:16 am

    The reasons that the R party is doubling down on Special K
    1. They are convinced that they can never be wrong.
    2. They have drunk their own Kool-Aid

  40. 40.

    Elizabelle

    September 24, 2018 at 10:17 am

    Do you guys think Kavanaugh will make it to his hearing Thursday?

  41. 41.

    hells littlest angel

    September 24, 2018 at 10:18 am

    One way or another, they seem very eager to die on this hill.

    And I am eager to let them.

  42. 42.

    Immanentize

    September 24, 2018 at 10:20 am

    @zhena gogolia: And I just replied: It’s really not a competition. If Mayer’s great book about Thomas (It’s on my shelf in my office — I’m looking at it) and Farrow’s reporting on Weinstein mean that different cohorts feel comfortable getting in touch with either or both about the sexual harassment or assault they have experienced, we all win.

  43. 43.

    Immanentize

    September 24, 2018 at 10:23 am

    Kavanaugh’s view of Presidential immunity seems completely different in the light of the allegations against him. It now seems more like he is trying to save himself from scrutiny by proposing a lessened scrutiny standard than just a position about executive authority.

  44. 44.

    TaMara (HFG)

    September 24, 2018 at 10:23 am

    they seem very eager to die on this hill.

    Please proceed.

  45. 45.

    BretH

    September 24, 2018 at 10:24 am

    I would be especially gratified if this also brings to light the sordid goings-on of these prep boys at that school and others in the DC area, and perhaps some measure of closure to the women who were abused there.

  46. 46.

    TaMara (HFG)

    September 24, 2018 at 10:24 am

    I have emojis? Where did these come from??? (someone got a chrome update I guess, LOL)

  47. 47.

    jharp

    September 24, 2018 at 10:25 am

    A written account of the remarks for those who can’t bear to hear Trump

    That’d be me.

    Thank you.

  48. 48.

    Smedley Darlington Prunebanks (formerly Mumphrey, et al.)

    September 24, 2018 at 10:26 am

    One way or another, they seem very eager to die on this hill.

    This is what mystifies me. Of all the things to go down for, why attempted rape and assault with a deadly willie? Why this fucking guy? There aren’t 700 other drones who wouldn’t rule the same way who didn’t get piss drunk and try to rape people? What’s the deal with these people?

  49. 49.

    bemused

    September 24, 2018 at 10:26 am

    @zhena gogolia:

    Funny, groan, but so true. Everything is always all about them. They are outraged when anyone fights back using the same tactics or remedies they do.

  50. 50.

    Immanentize

    September 24, 2018 at 10:27 am

    Jane Mayer from TPM:

    The New Yorker’s Jane Mayer, one of the authors of the story detailing Deborah Ramirez’s account of alleged sexual misconduct perpetrated by Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh, said that rumors of the alleged episode were so widespread that the New Yorker reached out to Ramirez—not the other way around.

    “She didn’t come forward with it,” Mayer said Monday on NBC’s “Today.” “What happened was, the classmates at Yale were talking to each other about it, they were emailing about it. We’ve seen the emails, back in July before Christine Blasey Ford came forward, and eventually the word of it spread.”

    “It spread to the Senate. It spread to the media,” she continued. “And [we] reached out to her. After giving it really careful consideration for six days, she decided to talk to [Ronan Farrow].”

  51. 51.

    schrodingers_cat

    September 24, 2018 at 10:27 am

    @zhena gogolia: Mansplaining, its not just for R party men.

  52. 52.

    Nicole

    September 24, 2018 at 10:27 am

    @Elizabelle: I really don’t know if he’ll make it to Thursday’s hearing. If he does, I think he gets seated (BAAARRRRFFFFF). If another shoe drops before then, I think he may withdraw.

    If the Dems do get control of Congress (I still have not ruled out ratf*cking by Russians and Republicans), they should go after his financials in their investigations. There’s so much wrong there that the media didn’t bother to even touch. But that generally is harder to wave away with, “But I kept a diary!” Yeah, well, so did the banks and the IRS, and theirs are a lot more comprehensive.

  53. 53.

    Amir Khalid

    September 24, 2018 at 10:27 am

    Has anyone else noticed this? I have lost the right to block autoplay on Firefox, and a few minutes ago I lost it on YouTube as well. The option on FireFox to require my pemission to play any video has been grayed out, and the no-autoplay button on YouTube has disappeared altogether. The fuckers.

  54. 54.

    Feathers

    September 24, 2018 at 10:29 am

    This is reminding me of a scene from The Age of Innocence. Countess Olenska has returned to New York, having shed her husband. This is not something accepted in New York society and she is snubbed. Her family goes to the powerful van der Luydens to make the argument that if Ellen’s family accepts her, and her reasons for living apart from her horrible husband, than the rest of New York society cannot be permitted to shame her, or the whole notion of the great old families controlling the social scene will crumble. The van der Luydens invite her to an exclusive and important dinner and the Countess is now safely a member of respectable society.

    This is what the Republicans are trying to pull off. They have, since 1968, declared themselves the determiners of what is and isn’t moral and what is and isn’t acceptable in American politics. This is why Nixon was pardoned, why the Iran Contra criminals were pardoned, why no one looked too closely at the rationale for the Iraq War, and too many other small moments to list here. They tried to say Obama was beyond the pale, but were not listened to by the people, although the media did treat their arguments as something which needed to be taken seriously.

    This is why we have Kavanaugh, because the Republicans knew if they say, no, this guy is too awful, then they are saying that other people (AKA Democrats, and by extension the media) have the right to judge them and find them wanting. If they lose Kavanaugh they lose the moral standing to rule unquestioned.

    All of the above applies to Trump as well, of course.

  55. 55.

    zhena gogolia

    September 24, 2018 at 10:29 am

    @Immanentize:

    Just trying to set the record straight.

  56. 56.

    Immanentize

    September 24, 2018 at 10:32 am

    @zhena gogolia: I think Jane Mayer just did.

  57. 57.

    Bruce K

    September 24, 2018 at 10:33 am

    It suddenly occurs to me that we’ve never had a situation where a sitting Supreme Court justice got disbarred. If that were to happen, I bet the GOP would be tying themselves in knots trying to explain how conduct that results in revocation of a license to practice law shouldn’t be sufficient to remove a man from the Supreme Court…

  58. 58.

    Jeff

    September 24, 2018 at 10:33 am

    Damned if they do. Damned if they don’t. I like it.

  59. 59.

    montanareddog

    September 24, 2018 at 10:34 am

    @Betty Cracker:

    I think it’s a Cleek’s Law thing for the talibangelicals now

    I agree entirely. They are just salivating at the thought of all those apoplectic SJW’s if Kavanaugh gets through. And decades to keep rubbing it in while simultaneously whining about how unfairly he was treated.

    as for President Dangle J Toadstool, he cannot abide the thought of losing, period. He must prevail!

  60. 60.

    gvg

    September 24, 2018 at 10:34 am

    who are “the evangelicals” in the context of politics? I don’t think they are the actual sincerely religious I used to know and see on television. They are overlooking too much that used to be immoral behavior, like hating on the poor and sex. Honestly, it used to be that conservative politicians had to be nearly Ceasar’s wife and so did respectable business leaders.
    I know quite a few black coworkers who read the bible in their spare time and do try to spread the word. They do NOT approve of this kind of thing. I still think someone in most of the white churches around here who had these allegations against him would not be appointed to any boards or permitted to minister.
    In the last 10 years or so, a bunch of so called religious leaders have started openly (as opposed to secretly) behaving worse than what they used to accuse liberals of. It’s bizarre. I can’t help wondering if they are operating on reputation and not as many follow their orders.
    I think it started a while back when the Clinton attack brigade started getting outed as guilty at the time of what they accused Bill of…Gingrinch and some others. Foley being corrupt and DeLay were also pretty shocking. But clearly not shocking enough.
    This isn’t religion, it’s tribalism. I know plenty of people who are actually religious though, it’s those who ought to defect.

  61. 61.

    Betty Cracker

    September 24, 2018 at 10:36 am

    @BretH: I’m around the same age as the folks in the Kavanaugh drama, and I can attest definitively that it didn’t just apply to prep schools. I graduated high school in rural Florida and went to the University of Florida in the mid to late 1980s, and the exact same shit was going on there.

  62. 62.

    kindness

    September 24, 2018 at 10:37 am

    I would like to think that when Leahy confirmed that Kavanaugh lied to his committee in 2006 during his hearings for current job that would have been enough. God knows it would have been had this been a Democratic nominee. But Republicans have become a tribal people. They are no longer in the democracy club. Now they just want to club everyone and take what they think is theirs (everything that isn’t welded down). Honestly I think Kavanaugh is going down and we are watching the death rattle.

  63. 63.

    BC in Illinois

    September 24, 2018 at 10:38 am

    One way or another, they seem very eager to die on this hill.

    “Your proposal is acceptable.”

  64. 64.

    Immanentize

    September 24, 2018 at 10:38 am

    @Bruce K: First, the Constitution does not require one to be a lawyer to be on the Supreme Court….
    From wikip…

    In total, of the 112 Justices appointed to the Court, 46 have had law degrees, an additional 18 attended some law school but did not receive a degree, and 47 received their legal education without any law school attendance.

    Although post–WWII, all appointed justices have had law degrees.

  65. 65.

    Feathers

    September 24, 2018 at 10:38 am

    @zhena gogolia: With you on the erasure issue. I don’t recall the timeline, but Ronan Farrow did have his story ready to report at NBC, before they shut it down. Would he have been first to the gate if that hadn’t happened.

    I think he is getting forefronted on this because he has been doing so many of these stories, about different industries and different abusers. That is because the abusees trust him because of his ferocious advocacy for and protectiveness of his sister. That is why this has become his ‘beat,’ and will continue to do so.

  66. 66.

    TriassicSands

    September 24, 2018 at 10:39 am

    Kavanaugh can’t be confirmed now, can he? The problem is his replacement will be just as bad (jurisprudentially). I’d expect a woman next (no problem with sex) and, if it is original short-lister Amy Coney Barrett, she’ll be terrible.

    If Kavanaugh withdraws or the nomination otherwise fails, the evangelical hypocrites will pitch an ear-splitting hissy fit. I’ve rarely seen them so dug in on an issue.

    They may whine (don’t they always) but they’ll be plenty happy with religious zealot Barrett.

  67. 67.

    Fair Economist

    September 24, 2018 at 10:40 am

    @Nicole:

    I really don’t know if he’ll make it to Thursday’s hearing. If he does, I think he gets seated (BAAARRRRFFFFF).

    I can’t see this. Voting for him at this point will be like handing in a resignation letter. Anybody in even a vaguely competitive election as long as he is on the Court is out – Cruz and Heller for starters. Every time he supports an unpopular decision will reheat the flames of despite and hatred Kavanaugh and the Republicans have so richly earned.

  68. 68.

    Immanentize

    September 24, 2018 at 10:42 am

    @Fair Economist: I’ve said it before, but Chief Justice Roberts must be going crazy kneeling in prayer that Kavanaugh doesn’t make it to the Court.

  69. 69.

    Mark Damico

    September 24, 2018 at 10:42 am

    “One way or another, they seem very eager to die on this hill.”
    Then please proceed.

  70. 70.

    chris

    September 24, 2018 at 10:43 am

    Shit.

    ?Scoop: Rod Rosenstein is resigning via @jonathanvswan t.co/nGPrOCUtAD— Stef W. Kight (@StefWKight) 24 September 2018

  71. 71.

    LAO

    September 24, 2018 at 10:43 am

    Holy Shit, if true:

    SCOOP: Rod Rosenstein has verbally resigned to John Kelly. t.co/EoJRxueXvI— Jonathan Swan (@jonathanvswan) September 24, 2018

  72. 72.

    PJ

    September 24, 2018 at 10:43 am

    @OzarkHillbilly: You may be right, but there are plenty of white women who think the whole thing is unfair to Kavanaugh, and they will continue to support Trump and the Republicans: washingtonpost.com/politics/its-hard-to-say-what-is-real-and-what-isnt-women-wrestle-with-accusation…

  73. 73.

    Immanentize

    September 24, 2018 at 10:45 am

    And, un-ironically at the same moment as the Kavanaugh shit show, Bill Cosby will be sentenced for — drugging and plying with alcohol a woman to have sex with her!

    What a spectacular mess we have before us.

  74. 74.

    father pusbucket

    September 24, 2018 at 10:45 am

    @OzarkHillbilly: Rename it the GROPE.

  75. 75.

    Nicole

    September 24, 2018 at 10:45 am

    @Fair Economist: I hope you’re right. I really, really do. But even before Dr. Ford’s letter became public, it was clear he was unfit for the USSC, and yet all the Republicans, including those who aren’t running for re-election, and so have no fear of the voters, were just as clear that they were going to vote for him. I don’t think it’s about the wrath of the voters for them; I think it’s about the wrath of the Koch brothers and all the other right-wing gravy trains they’re counting on when they’re out of government. Being a Senator is a stepping-stone job to better-paying work.

    (Either that or McConnell has 8X10 glossies of every Republican senator having sex with species other than Homo sapiens. As Ed Whelan has demonstrated, it would be irresponsible not to speculate.)

  76. 76.

    germy

    September 24, 2018 at 10:47 am

    Butch Groves texted Avenatti, perhaps after too many highballs. Lots of “respectable” white gentlemen deleting their twitter accounts:

    Meet @butchgroves, the Head of Upper School at The Oakridge School in Arlington, TX. I have never met him before or communicated with him but here is his message to me earlier tonight. The parents of Oakridge must be so proud to have this man teaching their sons and daughters. pic.twitter.com/vnNoFMKUYI— Michael Avenatti (@MichaelAvenatti) September 24, 2018

  77. 77.

    NotMax

    September 24, 2018 at 10:52 am

    @LAO

    (whistles innocently, avoids direct eye contact).

    :)

  78. 78.

    L85NJGT

    September 24, 2018 at 10:53 am

    McConnell is cynical enough to figure a loss will goose Evangelical turnout. The problem is it’s not 1994 anymore. Demographically they’re sliding off a cliff, which is reflected in Democrats becoming competitive in the Sunbelt.

  79. 79.

    Immanentize

    September 24, 2018 at 10:55 am

    AND — There goes Rosenstein.

  80. 80.

    PAM Dirac

    September 24, 2018 at 10:55 am

    @Feathers:

    They have, since 1968, declared themselves the determiners of what is and isn’t moral and what is and isn’t acceptable in American politics.

    This is why the IOKIYAR never quite rung true for me. It implies there is a process for determining who is OK that others can use/critique. Republicans are OK by definition. That is the reality they claim and privilege they want to remove the claim from any review. I think a useful operational definition of privilege is the situation where you can ignore reality and expect/take for granted/demand that lesser beings fix any inconsistencies/problems that arise. If BK goes down, it can not possibly be his fault, but must be because the liberals and women and other lesser beings didn’t do their job.

  81. 81.

    grandpajohn

    September 24, 2018 at 10:57 am

    @gvg: Who are these “False Christians”? They are the people described by Jesus in Matthew chap 7


    21 “Not everyone who says to me, ‘Lord, Lord,’ will enter the kingdom of heaven, but only the one who does the will of my Father who is in heaven. 22 Many will say to me on that day, ‘Lord, Lord, did we not prophesy in your name and in your name drive out demons and in your name perform many miracles?’ 23 Then I will tell them plainly, ‘I never knew you. Away from me, you evildoers!’

  82. 82.

    SiubhanDuinne, Badass Jackal

    September 24, 2018 at 10:58 am

    @OzarkHillbilly:

    Republican and Rape both begin with an “R”.

    Happily for us all, the same is true of Randy Rainbow, who has a brilliant and timely new song up.

  83. 83.

    NotMax

    September 24, 2018 at 10:59 am

    @LAO

    Holy what you said, but something is askew. Wouldn’t the resignation properly be submitted to Sessions?

  84. 84.

    NY Robbin

    September 24, 2018 at 10:59 am

    @LAO:

    As an express bus commuterwho works on Madison behind T Tower, you and me both!

  85. 85.

    Immanentize

    September 24, 2018 at 11:00 am

    @NotMax: I see he is disputing the resignation news, although he does expect to be fired….

  86. 86.

    SiubhanDuinne, Badass Jackal

    September 24, 2018 at 11:04 am

    @montanareddog:

    President Dangle J Toadstool

    ???????
    ???????

    Even the initials! Good work!

  87. 87.

    Elizabelle

    September 24, 2018 at 11:04 am

    FTF NYTimes, that set this in motion.

    WASHINGTON — Rod J. Rosenstein, the deputy attorney general, was expected on Monday to leave his job at the Justice Department, days after private discussions were revealed in which he talked about invoking the 25th Amendment to remove President Trump from office and secretly taping him to expose chaos in the administration.

    It was not immediately clear whether he expected to be fired by Mr. Trump or whether he planned to resign. Justice Department officials said on Monday morning that he was on his way to the White House expecting to be fired. But over the weekend, Mr. Rosenstein called a White House official and said he was considering quitting, and a person close to the White House said he was resigning.

  88. 88.

    SiubhanDuinne, Badass Jackal

    September 24, 2018 at 11:08 am

    @Elizabelle:

    CNN says he’s heading for the White House now, even as we type.

  89. 89.

    geg6

    September 24, 2018 at 11:18 am

    @zhena gogolia:

    I can’t even imagine why someone would say such a thing and I’m sure Ronan Farrow would agree with that. Jane Mayer gets all the credit she deserves from me. However, Ronan Farrow is also quite the journalist and, by working with him, Mayer obviously thinks so, too.

    They are both the epitome of what journalism should be about, IMHO. Jane has the longer resume and excellent track record simply by the fact of her longevity. But young Mr. Farrow is no less excellent for his lack of longevity. I admire the hell out of both of them.

  90. 90.

    Rand Careaga

    September 24, 2018 at 11:19 am

    @OzarkHillbilly: Rapepublicans.

  91. 91.

    joel hanes

    September 24, 2018 at 12:15 pm

    @gvg:

    I think it started a while back when the Clinton attack brigade started getting

    It started when Jerry Fallwell and Paul Weyrich founded the “Moral Majority” back in 1979.
    Evangelicals sold their souls in exchange for temporal power.

    Prior to that, evangelical Christians had not been much of an organized force in American politics.

  92. 92.

    Miss Bianca

    September 24, 2018 at 12:24 pm

    @Feathers: *rest of excellent post snipped*

    This is why we have Kavanaugh, because the Republicans knew if they say, no, this guy is too awful, then they are saying that other people (AKA Democrats, and by extension the media) have the right to judge them and find them wanting. If they lose Kavanaugh they lose the moral standing to rule unquestioned.

    I do believe you’ve just offered the most cogent and succinctly-stated explanation for this whole “Die on Kavanaugh Hill” phenomenon I’ve seen yet.* And your remarks about “this is who they’ve been since 1968” – I agree. Shit, it’s been *my whole life* as a sentient being that the Republicans have been like this. My God, how I hope they do get machine-gunned on that hill – by dint of voters saying, “enough, no more.” I’m not hopeful, because I’m almost reflexively cynical about my fellow Americans, but I’m not unhopeful, either.

    *Well, except for “They’re all fuckers.”

  93. 93.

    Miss Bianca

    September 24, 2018 at 12:35 pm

    @Elizabelle:

    FTF NYTimes, that set this in motion.

    For what it’s worth, I second that emotion. I now believe that the NYT is actively working to undermine our democracy, and sure, I want to know why – but that can come later. Right now, all I want is for them to be stopped. Somehow. Someway.

  94. 94.

    schrodingers_cat

    September 24, 2018 at 12:42 pm

    @Miss Bianca: As consumers we can boycott NYT. They get their power because they are considered the newspaper of record. The rest of the media follow where they lead.
    No links, no subscription, no views for The Treason Times. Fuck them.

  95. 95.

    TenguPhule

    September 24, 2018 at 1:27 pm

    One way or another, they seem very eager to die on this hill.

    The terms are acceptable.

  96. 96.

    J R in WV

    September 24, 2018 at 1:33 pm

    @OzarkHillbilly:

    Republican and Rape both begin with an “R”. Accident?

    So does Russian, and Russo-Republican !!

    Just a hint there…!

  97. 97.

    J R in WV

    September 24, 2018 at 1:51 pm

    You all are acting like the New Your Times just recently became an authoritarian mouth-piece.

    But really that started in the very early days of Mr. Hitler’s climb to power in Europe, when they wrote many florid descriptions of all the ways he would be good for the Germans. And Mr Stalin’s effective leadership of the former Tsarist Russia, which was such an improvement over the old-fashioned Imperial government Mr Stalin and his aides displaced.

    Seriously, the genocidal farm policy of moving all the food out of Ukraine thereby starving most of the Ukrainians to death was NOT covered by the NYT bureau chief in Moscow, who did Mr Stalin’s bidding in all things back in the 1930s.

    The NY Times never met a genocidal despot they didn’t love and admire. Look it up, Google knows where all those articles are.

  98. 98.

    chopper

    September 24, 2018 at 2:12 pm

    @OzarkHillbilly:

    can’t spell ‘republican’ without an R, A, P and E.

Comments are closed.

Primary Sidebar

On The Road - ema - Midtown Manhattan Fall Foliage
Image by ema (12/16/25)

2026 Pets of Balloon Juice Calendar

PLEASE REVIEW YOUR INFO ASAP

Recent Comments

  • comrade scotts agenda of rage on Tuesday Night Open Thread (Dec 16, 2025 @ 10:55pm)
  • WTFGhost on Tuesday Night Open Thread (Dec 16, 2025 @ 10:51pm)
  • Kayla Rudbek on Open Thread: They Got Nothing (Dec 16, 2025 @ 10:49pm)
  • YY_Sima Qian on Tuesday Night Open Thread (Dec 16, 2025 @ 10:44pm)
  • YY_Sima Qian on Tuesday Night Open Thread (Dec 16, 2025 @ 10:42pm)

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
On Artificial Intelligence (7-part series)

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)
Fix Nyms with Apostrophes

Balloon Juice Mailing List Signup

Social Media

Balloon Juice
WaterGirl
TaMara
John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
David Anderson
Major Major Major Major
DougJ NYT Pitchbot
mistermix
Rose Judson (podcast)

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Privacy Manager

Copyright © 2025 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!