And the blog gets a new spirit animal. https://t.co/F8YrkDOtsc
— Charles P. Pierce (@CharlesPPierce) October 4, 2018
Not just Mr. Pierce’s blog, either. Gonna be a long weekend, and not just because the Repub miscreants get to scamper away for an extra Monday…
The view inside GOP is that post Nov. elections, things could get wild. House could flip, Mueller report expected, subpoenas could start flying. Different players have diff’t levels of visibility into these possibilities, but the tensions and desire to confirm Kav are ubiquitous.
— Robert Costa (@costareports) October 4, 2018
So, on one or both of those, Repubs are FOS.
— Dana Houle (@DanaHoule) October 5, 2018
Everybody buckle in, buckle down…
Here’s the thing:
Republicans aren’t getting worse. They aren’t becoming more sociopathic and soulless. They’ve always been this way.
What we’re seeing is nothing more than situational ethics applied to a dying party.
It took less awfulness before but the awfulness isn’t new.
— The Hoarse Whisperer (@HoarseWisperer) October 4, 2018
Sometimes you have to enlarge a problem to solve it.
We are shining a light on the moral rot of a shrinking minority of voters and their leaders.
We are just over four weeks away from our time to rise up and roar.
We are the power they fear.
November 6th is our day.
— The Hoarse Whisperer (@HoarseWisperer) October 4, 2018
OzarkHillbilly
Blech.
Jeffro
“We are the power they fear” – LOVE IT!
Happy Infrastructure Friday, peeps!
Baud
Some mockery to brighten your day.
https://www.reddit.com/r/BetterEveryLoop/comments/9liwaw/trump_boarding_air_force_one_with_toilet_paper?sort=confidence
rikyrah
Good Morning, Everyone ???
rikyrah
@Baud:
Nobody cares enough to stop him.
OzarkHillbilly
OzarkHillbilly
@Baud: Yeah but Obama once saluted with a coffee cup in his hand.
Baud
@rikyrah: Good morning.
@rikyrah: Deep State.
Cermet
Love the new “Animal Spirit” for the blog; however, do we now refer to everyone as an angry bird, now? Or is Jackal still ok?
OzarkHillbilly
Beetlejuice mocks ‘Shortseller Enrichment Commission’ after SEC settlement
For somebody who despises shortsellers so much, he sure seems to be doing everything he can to fill their pockets.
Amir Khalid
The bird is not propelling itself through the air by the force of its anger.* It is of course merely resting briefly between wingstrokes, to conserve energy during flight as many birds do.
*Nice story, though.
OzarkHillbilly
Some people have all the luck.
Platonailedit
In a slap in the face to the totus thug of a rapist and his rapists party, Nobel peace prize goes to anti-rape activists.
Amir Khalid
Check your bank balance once in a while. You never know what you might find.
Amir Khalid
@OzarkHillbilly:
Goshdarn you.
OzarkHillbilly
@Amir Khalid: No it’s not! It’s been shot out of an avian rocket launcher!
OzarkHillbilly
@Amir Khalid: They say great minds think alike. But mine’s only mediocre.
p.a.
Aren’t shrikes the bird that impales its catch on thorns, barbed wire etc for later consumption? Totally believe it’s powered by anger…
SFAW
@OzarkHillbilly:
Percy! Yoo-hoo, PERCY! Cleanup needed on Aisle Ozark! STAT!!!
SFAW
@OzarkHillbilly:
Which explains you and me.
On those days when my mind is “punching WAAAAY above its weight.”
?BillinGlendaleCA
@Baud: Adam posted a tweet with video of that on an earlier thread.
SFAW
@p.a.:
The Shrike is its own set of thorns and barbed wire
Baud
@?BillinGlendaleCA: He’s always on top of things.
Matt McIrvin
@OzarkHillbilly: The guy is well on his way to the stage of letting his fingernails grow out, wearing Kleenex boxes on his feet and watching “Ice Station Zebra” over and over.
OzarkHillbilly
@OzarkHillbilly: I now see Anne got there last night. Love this tweet she snagged:
?BillinGlendaleCA
@Baud: TMI.
Baud
Soccer star Ronaldo is accused of rape. I wonder what office Trump will appoint him to.
Anne Laurie
@p.a.:
Yeppers! They kill their prey by striking them in the head, then “because they lack the powerful talons of other carnivorous birds”, impale their victims so they can tear them apart. An inspiration for Democrats who, lacking the general GOP lack of ethics, need to find other methods of taking those preverts out?
?BillinGlendaleCA
@Baud: Next vacancy on the Court, that’s where Trump likes to put the rapists.
OzarkHillbilly
Hmmm… Donald Trump’s Turnberry golf resort suffers disappointing profits
Standard trump business result, right? But then there is this little mackerel buried in the article:
So they invested £107M but their assets are now worth £2.3M less? Stinks of some pretty Creative Accounting to me.
satby
@OzarkHillbilly: ?
@rikyrah: Good morning ?
@Baud: rikyrah’s right. None of his security detail even likes him enough to try to prevent him from being embarrassed. Not that that’s possible every time he opens his ugly mouth anyway.
satby
@OzarkHillbilly: I hope the taxing authority in the UK goes after them hard for any irregularities.
magurakurin
@Matt McIrvin: that’s what I think, too. Elon’s not gonna make it long enough to see his glorious Mars Base. He’s gonna be in the padded room sooner than later.
pluky
@p.a.:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lanius
only predatory song bird!
Thoughtful David
@satby:
After the FTFNYT article on Trump’s tax fraud, I was wondering if other countries are going to start checking him closely. In which case they’ll find all kinds of fraud. In fact, I wonder why they aren’t already doing it? Or maybe they have, and now he’s being blackmailed by not only the Russians but also every other country where he’s ever done business?
OzarkHillbilly
@Baud: Ronaldo will fit right in, he’s already got the petulant whiny face down pat.
OzarkHillbilly
@pluky:
Ummmm….. No. Most song birds prey on insects.
Kay
Our candidate for state senate called me yesterday to complain about a local Dem activist. I don’t like the activist but I don’t like the candidate that much either – I haven’t paid any attention to her race because there’s a candidate for the lower chamber of the statehouse in this district who is genuinely talented and that’s just much more interesting. So the Dem activist went to some kind of forum where the candidate and the incumbent (her opponent) were speaking on issues. The activist filmed the event on his phone and then sent the candidate the video. She thought he was too aggressive and obtrusive at the event. Almost immediately after she called he showed up at the office so he must have known she would complain about him- maybe she told him. By the time he arrived to tell his side he had sent the video to the local newspaper, along with suggestions on which parts to pull out and highlight and he’s one of those “Democrats don’t know how to fight” people so I got to hear about that again. I may well be reading this into the dispute because I’ve been thinking a lot about men and women and control and power, but my sense talking to her was that’s the subtext- he doesn’t know she resents this because she sees it as controlling. Or she just doesn’t like him. The activist and I have a mutual friend so I may call him and ask him to back off the overenthusiastic volunteer, because it will be taken better coming from a friend. Maybe.
Baud
@Kay: That’s quite the soap opera.
donnah
Upon seeing the video of Trump boarding AF One with toilet paper stuck to his heel, Dan Savage tweeted, “That’s not toilet paper, that’s the Constitution”.
OzarkHillbilly
@Kay: Sucks to be you.
No OtR post this AM. Hope Alain’s OK
Bobby Thomson
@Kay:
Kay
@Bobby Thomson:
If I hear “bring a knife to a gun fight” again I am going to stab someone. With my knife. That I brought to the gun fight.
Baud
@Kay: Ha! We do love our memes.
satby
@Kay: a friend who wasn’t otherwise involved? No, it probably won’t be taken better that way. I think sharing your insight about the male-female control issues might be more helpful, since they both came to you to tell their stories. They involved you, so you have standing.
JGabriel
Donald Trump and Brett Kavanaugh.
Shit-shoe Spanky and the Beer Leerer.
satby
Hello edit my old friend……
Elizabelle
Good morning. Put this up on the previous thread, but it fits here too:
Elizabelle
I don’t watch cable news.
Have you all been informed that there is a 24/7 Peoples Filibuster taking place on the U.S. Capitol lawn, side that faces the Supreme Court?
Walked into it last night. Bernie Sanders was just finishing his speech (I shook his hand and thanked him as he walked past). Then Jeff Merkley. Then Richard Blumenthal. Then Elizabeth Warren. Then the woman who leads NARAL. And more speakers from the womens’ rights sector. And a great young woman emceed; she works for Brian Fannon and quipped in introducing him that he could tell them how many times she brought up “beer” during her job interview.
Is cable reporting on that? Because it was marvelous. And there were a lot of TV cameras there. Off to check if C-Span put up a feed…
ETA: Yea for the edit button! Welcome, esteemed button.
Jeffro
Hey, this deserves to ‘go viral’, as the kids say: I Am An Independent, Impartial Scorpion
And I promise I won’t sting that frog, either!
Petri-worthy!
Kay
@Baud:
I don’t mind people who say you have to fight. I agree with that, for several reasons. But if you’re going to be that person then you can’t get mad when you fight and lose because this is endless- there’s no defined end point- so “they didn’t fight” turns into an excuse for losing. I’ve actually started to question all the fighting/war/sports team comparisons. I’m sick of those. I want new comparisons.
debbei
@rikyrah:
My first thought too. Somewhere Melania was giggling hysterically.
debbie
@Amir Khalid:
Pretty amazing to be able to catch it at exactly the right moment.
Baud
@Kay: IMHO, almost everyone who says we have to fight says it precisely so they can attack Dems for losing (“You didn’t fight hard enough!”). As a corollary to that, if the Dems fight and win, then the fight immediately goes down the memory hole, and Dems return to their feckless status quo.
Baud
@Elizabelle: I don’t usually watch cable news either. Today show covered the protest in the Senate office building, but I didn’t see reporting about the rally.
Kay
@Jeffro:
I’m pleased people are making fun of him. It’s a kind of justice for Ford – they’re laughing at him.
If he gets away with this it will really be a new low. Unfuckingbelievable. He gave the defining speech of his career – his chance to present his case, not a moment of anger but a prepared speech with a whole fucking team assisting him- and now wants to RETRACT it. Demands we pretend we didn’t hear it and instead substitute this other speech, the one he didn’t give. He gets both- the campaign speech to rile up and his base AND the “I’m actually a judge” speech. And he gets them in the order he needs them- rile up the base and then appeal to normal people. They could teach this in school under “privilege, special favors”
debbie
@Kay:
Except they end up fighting each other instead of the other side. “Let us damage ourselves and save you the trouble, sirs.”
Jeffro
@Elizabelle:
so. very. THIS
Contrary to some of the media spin, I think it’s the GOP that blew it here – they tried to turn it into a partisan food fight, a ‘both-sides’ thing, but there are just too many angry folks on our side getting even angrier, for all the right reasons.
Heitkamp is a hero, too.
OzarkHillbilly
@Kay:
What I dislike, and most of us have been at least a little guilty of this at some point in time, is the retort that somebody “didn’t fight the right way”, you know, “the way I would have fought if I had been doing the fighting as I should have been and I would have told them how to fight if they’d only asked me and this is what they did wrong as I could have told them before they did it and totally would have if only they’d asked but I didn’t say anything before because…. reasons.”
ETA: and all too often they think their way was the right way without any evidence that it would have been anymore successful
Dorothy A. Winsor
@Kay: And he was firm that HE WROTE EVERY WORD HIMSELF. You hear? EVERY WORD.
Baud
@Dorothy A. Winsor: wrote = transcribed.
Jeffro
@Kay:
Spot-on, Kay. An outrage on top on an outrage, with a side order of outrage. “BK: a case study in how privilege works…and works…and works.”
Dorothy A. Winsor
Open thread so whining about unrelated matter: Amazon has a preposterously long delivery time for the ppb version of The Wind Reader–1-2 months. I swear they don’t want to sell books. Or at least not those from small presses. My editor says if people order direction from them (Inspired Quill), the book will be delivered in under 2 weeks and IQ is in the UK. It makes me crazy.
sixthdoctor
@Elizabelle: I also saw this tweet from Axios courtesy of Kyle Griffin FWIW:
Kay
@satby:
Thanks- I usually wait a bit and then act because my first idea is often… not good. Which is part of why I have so little sympathy for Kavanaugh. I get caught up in my work. I get invested. So what I have learned is I draft and then wait a day and revisit and I almost always revise, tone it down. But I do it BEFORE. I don’t deliver the fucking tirade and then ask for a do-over. Because I have to live with my mistakes.
debbie
@Dorothy A. Winsor:
Even two weeks seems too long. What happened to the Just in Time Principle?
Bruuuuce
@Jeffro: Spectacular! Thanks
Dorothy A. Winsor
@debbie: No kidding. Plus, I have Prime so I don’t pay shipping if I get a book from there, but I do if I order from a publisher. The publishers like it though. They have to pay Amazon a cut, which they get to keep if you order from them.
Gin & Tonic
Great Twitter thread about all those GRU (Russian military intelligence) operatives whose identities were exposed.
germy
FlipYrWhig
@Kay:
I feel like these people have massive overlap with people who “like to argue.” Frankly I think the whole thing is an exercise in non-jock male ego. The subtext is “we should be kicking ass wicked hard WITH WORDS.” And you can “win” an argument in life and still get zero of what you want, because there’s no judge to declare you the victor and compliment your toughness. Fake-tough is one of the worst kinds of performatively tough.
chopper
there is a third option; there’s some more shit in kavvy’s background that could come out in those weeks that would be even worse. or a fourth option D, there’s a decision coming up right now that the GOP wants him on the court for today.
personally, i do think the GOP is full of shit on A.
OzarkHillbilly
@Kay:
And that’s what sets us apart from our financial betters.
germy
Enhanced Voting Techniques
I can’t argue against that. The GOP leadership seems desperate and confused and trying to hide it with all the bluster.
Something to add to the list, apparently a recession has due to the housing bumbled collapsing, again, has started but will only show up with the rest of us 2019 according to a friend of my who does economic analyst for a bank. So the GOP is looking at a repeat of the 2006-7, except this time with Donald the idiot as their front man.
Tony Jay
@Jeffro:
It’s suddenly occured to me after reading some of the comments here that it’s – entirely – possible that a fairly large number of Republican Senators, while happy to say they are firm Yes votes and vote that way right up until it actually matters – really, really, really do not want Rapey-K on the Supreme Court.
They know they can get another Federal Society loon on the Court who’ll do everything their donors demand without all of this completely self-mutilating drama. Manchin and the others would barrel their way through a parade full of protestors for that opportunity. But here they are, slicing the masks from their shiny, white faces with blunt knives, all to preserve and protect an entitled dimwit because he’s promised the worst president in American history that he’ll defend him from treason charges.
They all know which way the winds are blowing, and what voting through rapey-K would mean for them and their Party in the long term. Is it so hard to believe that McConnell is having difficulty getting to 50 because he’s really having difficulty getting much more than 40 solid Yes votes as various GOP Senators duck and dive and douse themselves in slippery butter, all the better to avoid being the guy or gal who gets left holding the bag of moist elephant turds when the music stops?
A Ghost To Most
Fuck christian fascists.
germy
Paul Tweedy’s shrike tweet is amusing, but have you look at the rest of his tweets? He seems to be a real Hillary hating asshole.
Steve in the ATL
@debbie:
It’s alive and well and called the “Kindle”
Steve in the ATL
@A Ghost To Most: in defense of the very few actual Christians I know, those people are better described as Christianists as they call themselves Christians not do not follow the teachings of the Christ.
Jeffro
@Tony Jay:
Exactly! This is why it’s important to call these clowns and ask them…and/or ask the media to ask them…why not just #NominateAnotherWingnut? Is it THAT hard to drop the lying, hyper-partisan, sexual assault artist? Just go get crazy Amy Coney Barrett or whatever her name is…Hardiman or whomever…but Kavanaugh is so radioactive that the GOP majority can’t even get behind him. I don’t want to see Barrett or Hardiman up there on SCOTUS, but hey, it’s their WH and their Senate majority…they can put up whomever they can live with. BK, they can’t even live with, apparently.
ixnay
@Amir Khalid: tOf course, but how many birds look as po’d as that shrike while doing it? Gives a whole new dimension to “resting b**ch face.”
H.E.Wolf
@Kay:
Suzette Haden Elgin (author, Ozark native, and Ph.D. in Linguistics) was a proponent of using carpentry metaphors instead of combat metaphors:
“hammering out an agreement”
“building a stronger case”
“on the square and on the level” [h/t Alain]
She noted that carpentry metaphors allow for a language of collaboration.
Google has a bunch of links, including a reference to one of her books: How to Disagree Without Being Disagreeable.
H.E.Wolf
@A Ghost To Most:
This, by contrast, is a rape metaphor.
“Fuck”, as an imperative verb, implies a lack of choice for the recipient of the action.
ETA: Joining in the chorus of thanks for the return of the edit function!
Tony Jay
@Jeffro:
I can sort of see the pickle they’ve dropped themselves in here, though I don’t have an ounce of sympathy. By going all in to defend Rapey-K they’ve wrapped themselves in the bloody red banner of MRA/Incel/Men’sLivesMatter victimhood and that is definitely – not – a good look.
The MSM are doing their best to frame this for them as a purely ‘partisan’ issue, but an inch beneath the surface of that coverage lies the reality of what the issue is that the Parties are divided on. Briefly, one Party supports the right of women not to be attacked, abused, degraded, ignored, and generally treated as the property of any passing white male, while the other Party stands athwart history with its flies open, beer bottle in hand, yelling “Respect The Cock!”
That’s not a sustainable political model. IMHO
Elizabelle
@Jeffro: I don’t want to see another Trump nominee to the Supreme Court before the Mueller case makes it way completely through our courts.
Trump is welcome to nominate Merrick Garland. Otherwise, no more Trump “justices.”
Trump did not win the popular vote. The Senators who voted approve Gorsuch’s nomination received over 20 million fewer votes than did the lesser number of Senators who opposed Gorsuch.
This is tyranny of the minority. It has to stop.
Another reason to allow no further Trump USSC justices: very soon, we need to deal with the implications of the Electoral College. It needs to go.
Kavanaugh’s confirmation would actually dangerously destablize the Supreme Court as an institution. Do you think most of the current USSC justices are rooting for Kavanaugh? I do not.
Frankensteinbeck
@Jeffro:
I suggest you think about this from a different context. Suppose that instead of a devious political mastermind, McConnell is a cranky old racist asshole much like his voters. Add in that not only was a black man elected president, but that black man repeatedly defeated McConnell in contests of wit and will. I believe you will find that much of the last ten years makes more sense. In this case, it is unacceptably offensive to have Democrats win, not push through whoever McConnell wants simply because he can, be shown up by a woman, and see a good man be denied his birthright because of a trivial pecadillo like rape.
OzarkHillbilly
@Elizabelle:
Pretty sure Roberts is piling prayer upon prayer that BK doesn’t make it. He is very much concerned with how his precious institution is viewed by the masses.
Elizabelle
@OzarkHillbilly: I am wondering if the justices are talking to any of the senators, behind the scenes.
I am sure that Roberts is horrified.
Brachiator
I’m not sure when voter registration ends, but it’s officially Voting Time.
In California and other states, mail in voting starts Monday. Every day between now and November is time to fire people up.
E
satby
@Kay: most of us can be hot right off the presses, so a cool off and reassess is always good. But both came to you, that tells me they want you on their side, or at least your approval for their actions. I think your insight about control as it’s experienced by females when males aggressively push their view is really relevant here, and considering the larger environment, timely. You can deliver that better than someone who didn’t have that insight into the dynamics.
Steve in the ATL
@Elizabelle: Gorsuch, Alito, and Thomas are, because they are unapologetic partisan operatives like Kavanaugh. Roberts is too, but he’s Chief Justice and he still fantasizes that his court won’t be viewed by history as one of the reasons that that the USA collapsed (along with Reagan, Gingrich, and McConnell).
Steve in the ATL
@Elizabelle: yes, he wants a more subtle partisan whore
Amir Khalid
@ixnay:
Birds of prey always look pissed off. It scares the crap out of their prey so they can’t put up a fight.
terraformert
“Nov. 6 is our day”
Yes, assuming the election isn’t stolen (again). While we already know that a takeover of the House and/or (pray FSM) the Senate will be blamed on Chinese interference or whatever, what are we going to do if that Blue Wave doesn’t happen?
I know I keep posting about this in various threads, and I hope I’m wrong. But damn, they’ve stolen at least 2 national elections in the past 18 years, and who knows how many state-level elections. And we still don’t have any verifiable election results trail to scrutinize. I’m worried about this, as all these old, white, misanthropic men know their base is declining, and they’ve already shown they’ll go to any length to maintain power.
Jeffro
@Tony Jay:
Yup. Would love to see some more stories about why several GOP Senators are so conflicted – if it’s just a partisan food fight, why are a half-dozen folks on their side so angsty about BK. Well, MSM, it’s ’cause the guy is a pretty slimy, hyper-partisan, liar. Why aren’t MORE of the GOP Senators conflicted? There’s another story right there…
hueyplong
@Amir Khalid: Sort of like what Grassley and Graham are doing (poorly), hoping their vein-popping tirades keep Dems and wavering GOPers from putting up a fight.
In a way, I’m glad Graham has decided to go out in a manner that more accurately portrays his career narrative.
Frankensteinbeck
@Amir Khalid:
Certain facial traits, for example binocular, focused eyes with a heavy brow to ward off sun glare, are common in predators because they’re good for hunting. Humans tend to arrange our faces in that style when we perform violence, to pick up some of the advantages. Therefor, because of convergent evolution, most predators look pissed off to humans, especially when they’re hunting.
(I am totally bullshitting, but I’d put at least 50/50 what I just said is true because behavioral evolution so commonly works like that.)
zhena gogolia
Testing — Nope, no edit function here. And no nym.
OzarkHillbilly
@Elizabelle: Maybe if a Senator calls them. They try to distance themselves as much as possible from the politics of the moment.
@Steve in the ATL: He is very much a slave to perception and plausible deniability, but credit where credit is due: He upheld the ACA citing a constitutional clause that wasn’t even argued.
Shakti
@Elizabelle: Not sure.
The only justices who might root for Kavanaugh as a person are Thomas, because Kavanaugh makes him look like a well tempered angel, and Gorsuch, because they went to the same prep school within two years of each other.
I don’t see “unlikely aisle crossing friendships” happening with this guy, for obvious reasons. [Scalia and RGB went on vacation together.]
The conservative judges probably would welcome someone else who’d rule on cases like they would.
Jeffro
@Elizabelle: I do agree with you. When I say #NominateAnotherWingnut, that’s my argument to the various RWNJs in my life and on social media: why not just get some Federalist Society nut without the sexual assault history, hyper-partisanship, and lying. It’s not what I actually want to happen. It’s me trying to cause them some cognitive dissonance. Sorry for not making that very clear. But I’m totally with you on ‘Garland or bust’ (perhaps ‘Garland or someone even left-er’ =)
As for the Electoral College, I completely agree, it absolutely must go. I’m actually ok with the Senate going as well, or at least no longer voting on legislation, and being required (by constitutional amendment if need be) to give presidential nominations a hearing within X days of the nomination and an up-or-down floor vote within Y days after that. Expand and un-gerrymander the House as well. It’s all part of a package and I hope the Dems fight like hell to get it all accomplished a.s.a.p.
Gin & Tonic
Reports that the head of Interpol has gone missing while on a trip to China.
Gin & Tonic
@zhena gogolia: The edit function seems to be available for the most recent comment, regardless of whether you wrote it.
Spanky
You would maybe think that Senators might pay attention to this:
Sadly, no!
(
EATETA: And I can edit! Neener, neener.)Quinerly
@Jeffro: I absolutely adore this. Thank you so very much for posting.
OzarkHillbilly
Some moistened bint has been lobbing scimitars again.
Gin & Tonic
Well, I lied about the edit. Sometimes it’s there for my comments, sometimes it’s there for somebody else’s, sometimes it’s not there at all.
Tony Jay
@Jeffro:
Because the savvy boys and girls of the MSM already know the answer. The GOP runs on hate, resentment and victimhood with funding by greed, corruption and entitlement, so neither their Base nor their Funders give a single solitary shit about Rapey-K’s guilt except insofar as it gives them jollies to see Liberals so angry about it.
And IOKIYAR, always and forever.
El Caganer
@Brachiator: It’s already on here in Florida. I mailed mine in yesterday.
Gin & Tonic
@OzarkHillbilly: I seem to recall reading about that somewhere quite recently.
Mike in DC
@Gin & Tonic: He’s a Chinese national and government official, which complicates things.
Gin & Tonic
@Mike in DC: Thanks, I didn’t know that.
schrodingers_cat
Has Manchin decided? Does MMc have the votes?
bemused
@OzarkHillbilly:
Right. Kav was not smart enough and exhibited no self-control. He had to go openly blab his far right partisanship. He was supposed to exude a pretense of calm, judicious temperament and fairness in judging cases before the SC.
Jeffro
@Quinerly: No problem! So on-point and well done, had to share.
Leto
Mitch McConnel speaking. Can’t even begin to put into words how much I hate him. I hope his headstone is forever spray painted with, “Merrick. Fucking. Garland.” Any time it is replaced, mark it again. From here till the end of time. An unmarked paupers grave would be better, but put the truth on his headstone. Fucking turtle.
Dirk Reinecke
If you look up devil’s triangle on the urban dictionary, most of the top entries are making fun of Kavanaugh
mali muso
Still obsessing over the disaster zone that was my childhood stomping grounds (Palu, Indonesia). One week since the earthquake and tsunami, and the government still hasn’t really kicked the aid effort into high gear. It took them several days to decide to let international groups in to assist. In the meantime, anyone who was trapped in rubble is beyond saving, clean water is scarce and it sounds like people on the ground are getting desperate.
On a purely geeky note, this set of info graphics and before/after maps really help you understand what happened. It’s eerie to see on a map how the earth actually shifted several meters. Mother nature does not mess around.
For anyone wanting to help the victims, this is a pretty good round-up of organizations involved who could use support.
AliceBlue
@schrodingers_cat: I haven’t heard anything about Manchin, but according to TPM Sasse is a yes.
schrodingers_cat
@AliceBlue: Of course, pretty Sasse was never going to vote against party.
eclare
@Leto: Or painted with the Obama Hope portrait
David Evans
@debbie: I don’t wish to minimise the photographer’s achievement – just getting a bird like that in the frame is hard enough – but many cameras will now let you take a movie clip and extract the best frame as a still picture. Panasonic calls it the “4K photo” mode.
LAO
janesays
Collins is a yes on cloture vote, and will announce her decision about final vote this afternoon at 3pm ET. Worth noting – McCain voted yes on cloture for Obamacare repeal last year.
LAO
germy
https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/plum-line/wp/2018/10/05/elizabeth-warrens-new-tantalizing-claim-about-kavanaugh-shows-what-utter-madness-this-is/?utm_term=.d032a2dab470
Elizabelle
@janesays: Exactly. Cloture and confirmation are two separate votes.
Although I would love to see cloture fail, and thus more debate on Kavanaugh. Sunlight is not his friend.
schrodingers_cat
This is R minority rule, raping our democracy.
LAO
@Elizabelle: It did not fail. 51-49, final tally.
Elizabelle
@LAO: May they not get that tally for confirmation.
I do not think they will. Perhaps Manchin will never have to declare.
germy
@schrodingers_cat: And so many of the most horrible offenders have southern accents, I’ve noticed.
hueyplong
@LAO: “It did not fail. 51-49, final tally.”
What are you calliing “it”? I hope “it” is not the confirmation itself.
janesays
@Elizabelle: If Collins declares “no” this afternoon, it all falls to Manchin (unless Flake also declares “no”, which I don’t expect).
LAO
@hueyplong: Cloture.
Jim, Foolish Literalist
@LAO: straight party line vote? Manchin voted against cloture?
I can’t watch, I should unplugging altogether for a few hours
hueyplong
@ LAO Good, thanks My only current source (and it’s intermittent) is this site.
WaterGirl
@Kay:
Me, too!
Has anybody posted the cartoon mocking Kavanaugh’s op ed? Yogi Bear with the title I Will Not Steal Your Pic-A-Nic Basket. I saw it in this thread on LGM.
http://www.lawyersgunsmoneyblog.com/2018/10/modified-limited-hangout
janesays
It bears repeating – John McCain voted “yes” on cloture for Obamacare repeal last year. A “yes” today does not automatically mean a “yes” tomorrow.
LAO
@Jim, Foolish Literalist: Manchin voted aye, Murkowski vote nay. (Flake and Collins also yays).
Jim, Foolish Literalist
Yowza. My view from afar has always been that of the alleged “pro-choice moderates” (scare quotes cause I don’t think either one is meaningfully either one), Collins is the less conservative but more opportunistic because she loves the media attention she gets for her schtick.
Schlemazel
We might need to set up a fund for Manchin like they did for Collins. “Vote aye & all this money will go to your primary opponent”
Elizabelle
@Jim, Foolish Literalist: I agree with you. Murkowski is the real deal, Collins is the pretender.
Just Chuck
I don’t agree with the premise of HoarseWhisperer’s tweet: I can remember a time when the Republican party was at least above treason.
LAO
@Jim, Foolish Literalist: Well, Murkowski has proven to be primary proof — she’s not beholden to the Republican party after she won re-election as a write-in.
Rommie
So, if Murkowski’s no on cloture is a tell, it’s on Pence’s shoulders barring another change. And I can still hope he’s not thrilled about that anchor if he thinks the Big Chair is his sometime soon. A little arm-twisting from him so it’s not 50-50 may help get NO vote 51.
It’s hard for me to fathom that Manchin would willingly be vote 50 in 50-50 YES, as he might as well switch parties then. He’s either a NO or vote 51+ YES that doesn’t matter, although he’ll still (rightly) get a lot of heat for that.
debbie
@David Evans:
And it will still be as sharp as a photograph?
Spanky
It’s a Friday in October and the Dow is down another 150. A bit of deja vu to add to the Senate shenanigans.
Not real concerning, given the bounces the market (NOT the economy) has been doing the past few weeks. Just that I realized it’s a Friday, and it’s October, and the ungulate herd that buys and sells keeps these things in mind.
J R in WV
I’ll remind folks that today’s cloture vote isn’t really the confirmation vote, it’s just a procedural vote to allow debate and the actual final vote. So these folks may well be voting for cloture just a cover, “We want to have the traditional Senatorial debate, which will allow us to learn more and share our opinions and new facts.” kind of thing.
Which is my way of hoping that the final vote is different by at least a couple of votes.
ETA: edit works for me right now.
debbie
@Spanky:
Twenty minutes later, it’s down 200. I have nothing in the market anymore, but I keep MarketWatch on at work. It’s been a real education watching the twitches and panics.