• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

Republicans want to make it harder to vote and easier for them to cheat.

Just because you believe it, that doesn’t make it true.

This country desperately needs a functioning Fourth Estate.

Jack Smith: “Why did you start campaigning in the middle of my investigation?!”

They traffic in fear. it is their only currency. if we are fearful, they are winning.

It’s a new day. Light all those Biden polls of young people on fire and throw away the ashes.

Prediction: the gop will rethink its strategy of boycotting future committees.

Republican obstruction dressed up as bipartisanship. Again.

Imperialist aggressors must be defeated, or the whole world loses.

Somebody needs to explain to DeSantis that nobody needs to do anything to make him look bad.

This must be what justice looks like, not vengeful, just peaceful exuberance.

The new republican ‘Pastor’ of the House is an odious authoritarian little creep.

If you’re pissed about Biden’s speech, he was talking about you.

The Giant Orange Man Baby is having a bad day.

When someone says they “love freedom”, rest assured they don’t mean yours.

The cruelty is the point; the law be damned.

Marge, god is saying you’re stupid.

Some judge needs to shut this circus down soon.

Insiders who complain to politico: please report to the white house office of shut the fuck up.

This blog will pay for itself.

Whoever he was, that guy was nuts.

We are aware of all internet traditions.

Do not shrug your shoulders and accept the normalization of untruths.

Proof that we need a blogger ethics panel.

Mobile Menu

  • Four Directions Montana
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • COVID-19 Coronavirus
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • 2024 Elections
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • Targeted Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Anderson On Health Insurance / Levels and wiggles

Levels and wiggles

by David Anderson|  October 12, 20189:14 am| 2 Comments

This post is in: Anderson On Health Insurance, C.R.E.A.M.

FacebookTweetEmail

Average premiums for the ACA are likely to barely increase. There are locally massive rate decreases. CMS is taking a victory lap.

I think CMS is right on the proliferation of Section 1332 reinsurance waivers has contributed to lower premiums in seven states. The rest I think is far more questionable. I think that when we look at 2018 Medical Loss Ratios, we see that insurers massively overpriced. Insurers did not know what the rules would be in 2018 so they either ran like hell or raised rates.

We get two different pricing scenarios. Scenario 1 is the counterfactual scenario where 2018 was “correctly” priced so that most insurers would end up normally profitable with an MLR in the mid-80s. Scenario 2 is roughly what we are seeing in reality where insurers will be Scrooge McDucking it on the individual market in 2018 with MLRs in the 60s and 70s.

In Year 1 and 3 under both scenarios, the pricing is the same.

The difference is in Year 2. Under the counterfactual case (Scenario 1) there is a large price spike as CSR is built into premiums and medical trend matters. In the reality case (Scenario 2) we see a huge spike. Insurers built CSR into the premiums, medical trend matters, insurer drop out matters, fear of spiking morbidity due to messaging and potential mandate repeal and intense political leverage for state regulators to approve any rate level. Fear, rule set uncertainty, and empty markets created by fear and rule set uncertainty drives massive rate increases.

Moving to year 3, Scenario 1 has a premium increase from a realistically priced 2018. Medical trend hits again plus mandate repeal minus health insurance tax repeal minus reinsurance creates the current price point. Under Scenario 2, the insurers are trying to price the 2019 market so that they don’t have incredibly outsized profits leading to mega-MLR rebates. Under both scenarios the Year 3 price point is the same but the change from prior years is different.

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « Friday Morning Open Thread: Finding A Home
Next Post: Friday Afternoon Open Thread »

Reader Interactions

2Comments

  1. 1.

    Another Scott

    October 12, 2018 at 11:58 am

    Even with the rebates for over-pricing, aren’t there incentives in the system for the companies to follow the Scenario 2 line? Upper management presumably gets pay and bonuses based on “growing revenue” and “exceeding targets” and the like. If the only disincentive is that they have to cut some checks at the end of the year (to rebate excessive premiums), why won’t they follow Scenario 2 whenever they have the opportunity? “Bird in the hand” and all that, right?

    Could the rebate checks be cut quarterly rather than annually? Would that help to force the insurance companies to be more realistic in their pricing?

    Thanks.

    Cheers,
    Scott.

  2. 2.

    David Anderson

    October 12, 2018 at 12:11 pm

    @Another Scott: This is a good question… and honestly I am very sympathetic to actuaries making a big mistake in 2018 and massively overpricing as they had no idea what the rule set would be which means they had no idea what the population and its morbidity would be.

    As far as quarterly versus annual rebates — I am scared of that as one catastrophic event that does not get covered by reinsurance could blow out a small insurer’s claims expense for a year in which they paid out rebates for multiple quarters.

Comments are closed.

Primary Sidebar

Recent Comments

  • Chet Murthy on Wednesday News Roundup, A Little Late (Apr 18, 2024 @ 2:31am)
  • NotoriousJRT on War for Ukraine Day 785: Chernihiv Attacked! (Apr 18, 2024 @ 2:26am)
  • Dangerman on Wednesday News Roundup, A Little Late (Apr 18, 2024 @ 2:25am)
  • Jay on War for Ukraine Day 785: Chernihiv Attacked! (Apr 18, 2024 @ 2:16am)
  • Chet Murthy on Wednesday News Roundup, A Little Late (Apr 18, 2024 @ 2:11am)

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Balloon Juice Meetups!

All Meetups
Talk of Meetups – Meetup Planning
Proposed BJ meetups list from frosty

Fundraising 2023-24

Wis*Dems Supreme Court + SD-8
Virginia House Races
Four Directions – Montana
Worker Power AZ
Four Directions – Arizona
Four Directions – Nevada

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
Positive Climate News
War in Ukraine
Cole’s “Stories from the Road”
Classified Documents Primer

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Mailing List Signup
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)

Fix Nyms with Apostrophes

Balloon Juice for Ukraine

Donate

Twitter / Spoutible

Balloon Juice (Spoutible)
WaterGirl (Spoutible)
TaMara (Spoutible)
John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
David Anderson
Major Major Major Major
ActualCitizensUnited

Political Action 2024

Postcard Writing Information

Balloon Juice for Four Directions AZ

Donate

Balloon Juice for Four Directions NV

Donate

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2024 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!