• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

Is it negotiation when the other party actually wants to shoot the hostage?

We cannot abandon the truth and remain a free nation.

Why did Dr. Oz lose? well, according to the exit polls, it’s because Fetterman won.

Good lord, these people are nuts.

A Senator Walker would be an insult to the state and the nation.

A sufficient plurality of insane, greedy people can tank any democratic system ever devised, apparently.

John Fetterman: Too Manly for Pennsylvania.  Paid for by the Oz for Senator campaign.

A thin legal pretext to veneer over their personal religious and political desires

The willow is too close to the house.

Technically true, but collectively nonsense

And now I have baud making fun of me. this day can’t get worse.

Balloon Juice has never been a refuge for the linguistically delicate.

Sitting here in limbo waiting for the dice to roll

Republicans don’t want a speaker to lead them; they want a hostage.

Red lights blinking on democracy’s dashboard

Consistently wrong since 2002

I did not have this on my fuck 2022 bingo card.

I’d hate to be the candidate who lost to this guy.

When do we start airlifting the women and children out of Texas?

Impressively dumb. Congratulations.

I really should read my own blog.

You don’t get rid of your umbrella while it’s still raining.

We still have time to mess this up!

JFC, are there no editors left at that goddamn rag?

Mobile Menu

  • Winnable House Races
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • Balloon Juice 2023 Pet Calendar (coming soon)
  • COVID-19 Coronavirus
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • War in Ukraine
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • 2021-22 Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Anderson On Health Insurance / Will Alexander-Murray be resurrected

Will Alexander-Murray be resurrected

by David Anderson|  November 9, 20189:35 am| 9 Comments

This post is in: Anderson On Health Insurance

FacebookTweetEmail

Alexander-Murray was a bipartisan attempt to fund Cost Sharing Reduction (CSR), add reinsurance, change 1332 waiver regulations, mandate outreach funding to be distributed via the states from HHS central control and doing something funkily unproductive with rebranding Catastrophic plans as Copper plans.

It failed to advance despite having 60 Senators sponsor or support it.

There have been rumors of it coming back in some form.

this may mean some brief eventual opening for a new version of what we used to call alexander-murray – to stabilize the exchanges. Still iffy chances and way off on the horizon… (and abortion language could easily make it all fall apart again) https://t.co/SBe8PlCrlY

— Joanne Kenen (@JoanneKenen) November 7, 2018


I have always argued that since late summer 2017, the threat and then the reality of terminating CSR payments is both a fundamental rewriting of the ACA individual market mechanics and a movement towards preferred Democratic/liberal policy objectives.

The lack of direct CSR funding has fundamentally changed the market and the lived experienced of subsidized individuals buying on the Exchanges. We see this in the pricing strategies on Exchange in 2019:

  • Way more Gold Gapping in 2019 than 2018 (at least in counties, I have not population weighed)
    • 2018: 595 counties had at least 1 Gold plan less expensive than Benchmark
    • 2019: 1,136 counties had at least 1 gold plan less expensive than Benchmark
  • More really big Silver Gaps (Counties with at least a $100 Silver gap between benchmark and least expensive Silver)
    • 2018: 174
    • 2019: 198

There are no premium plans in Oklahoma. 

States that are actively caring or insurers that have actuaries and product pricing analysts who are not sleeping at their job have well known and well publicized routes to hold non-subsidized buyers harmless from CSR shenanigans. 

As I argued repeatedly, the ACA has changed.

Democrats have no reason to trade CSR funding for policies that they don’t prefer.  Inaction gives them an incredible policy victory.  Conservatives are the ones who need to make concessions to fully fund CSR.

The Congressional Budget Office projects that most states will allow insurers over the long run to load the cost of their obligated but not reimbursed CSR obligations to only their Silver plans.  This will have an incredible change in the dynamics of the market.

And more recently in March 2017 I commented on Alexander-Collins:

We have a real, pragmatic baseline of reality as it is today; CSR has mostly been rolled up into premiums. This led to the Silver Loading and Gold Gapping where people who earn between 200% to 400% Federal Poverty Level (FPL) ($24,040-$48,080 for a single individual) got really good deals on subsidized Bronze and Gold plans this year. This reality is the alternate analysis. And from there, funding CSR takes $32 billion dollars out of the ACA.

So the bill is a net cut to the ACA and a major reduction in female reproductive autonomy.

I could see an agreement zone on reinsurance, I could see an agreement zone on 1332 rules, I could see an agreement on catastrophic plans (although I don’t see the point of that policy).

I don’t see an agreement zone on CSR given the pragmatic changes of the lived experience of the ACA.

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « You’ve got your feet in LA but your mind’s on Tennessee
Next Post: It’s Time for the Annual God Damned Calendar »

Reader Interactions

9Comments

  1. 1.

    sherparick

    November 9, 2018 at 10:20 am

    I don’t know if Senator (I want to be in the middle) Schumer understands this. Despite 12 years of seeing how McConnell operates as the leader of the Senate Republicans, he keeps assuming McConnell is dealing in good faith with him.

  2. 2.

    cain

    November 9, 2018 at 10:24 am

    I wonder if we can get Republicans to get on board in order to move towards moderation given that their seats could be taken away from them in two years. I would really like to see the media pressure republicans about now that they lost so heavily whether that they will finally move to the center. For some reason, the media always want us liberals to move rightward.

  3. 3.

    Yarrow

    November 9, 2018 at 10:26 am

    @cain: The media thinks the blue wave was a trickle and Dems underperformed. Don’t count on them to set that narrative.

  4. 4.

    cain

    November 9, 2018 at 10:39 am

    @Yarrow:

    @Ian Harper: Yeah, Tennessee, like Missouri and Arkansas, was a state that occasionally elected sane people — even Democrats! — to Congress and statewide office, but now appears to be firmly in the grip of the craziest-ass MAGAts in the whole country. What happened?

    Which media? I know MSNBC has been touting the blue wave. Do you mean newspapers like the New York Times? Unfortunately though I agree that we can’t count on them to set the narratives because these folks are all closet conservatives.

  5. 5.

    Cheryl from Maryland

    November 9, 2018 at 10:47 am

    Anything with Susan Collins involved is suspect.

  6. 6.

    Anonymous At Work

    November 9, 2018 at 12:20 pm

    Screw the Senate side. Pelosi won’t go along because she knows that if Mitchy allows a vote, then the bill is poisoned. Both Ryan and McConnell were using the two bills as a way to provide bipartisan cover for vulnerable Republicans in 2018. McConnell’s only interest in such a bill this time around is to help provide cover for Republicans in 2020. Pelosi knows better. Doesn’t matter (directly) if Schumer does or not.

  7. 7.

    Ken

    November 9, 2018 at 12:48 pm

    Dems minimums:
    1. Remove the cap on APTCs so people earning 400FPL+ can get APTC
    2. My understanding (I don’t recall source) is that the maximum percentage of income someone will have to to pay for benchmark silver–i.e., the applicable percentage/affordability percentage, the 9.56% for 2018/9.86% for 2019–may rise above 10% in future as the calculation changes. That number should be absolutely capped at ~10%.
    3. Fix family glitch

  8. 8.

    Ken

    November 9, 2018 at 1:01 pm

    26 USC 36B(b)(3)(B)(ii) needs a new (IV) saying in no event will the applicable percentage be greater than 10%, so no matter what happens to CPI and premium growth and income and gross ACA credits in future, the 10% cap is there

  9. 9.

    Bob Hertz

    November 10, 2018 at 7:26 am

    David – what is the reference to female reproductive autonomy? I lost you there.

Comments are closed.

Primary Sidebar

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

2023 Pet Calendars

Pet Calendar Preview: A
Pet Calendar Preview: B

*Calendars can not be ordered until Cafe Press gets their calendar paper in.

Recent Comments

  • Starfish on Open Thread (Jan 29, 2023 @ 4:36pm)
  • Ruckus on Sunday Morning Open Thread: Kevin McCarthy, Out of His Depth in the Congressional Wading Pool (Jan 29, 2023 @ 4:35pm)
  • HumboldtBlue on Open Thread (Jan 29, 2023 @ 4:35pm)
  • zhena gogolia on Open Thread (Jan 29, 2023 @ 4:34pm)
  • sab on Open Thread (Jan 29, 2023 @ 4:32pm)

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
We All Need A Little Kindness
Favorite Dogs & Cats
Classified Documents: A Primer

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Mailing List Signup

Front-pager Twitter

John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
TaMara
David Anderson
ActualCitizensUnited

Shop Amazon via this link to support Balloon Juice   

Join the Fight!

Join the Fight Signup Form
All Join the Fight Posts

Balloon Juice Events

5/14  The Apocalypse
5/20  Home Away from Home
5/29  We’re Back, Baby
7/21  Merging!

Balloon Juice for Ukraine

Donate

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2023 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!