• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

He imagines himself as The Big Bad, Who Is Universally Feared… instead of The Big Jagoff, Who Is Universally Mocked.

Every reporter and pundit should have to declare if they ever vacationed with a billionaire.

Somebody needs to explain to DeSantis that nobody needs to do anything to make him look bad.

Take hopelessness and turn it into resilience.

Some judge needs to shut this circus down soon.

Republicans don’t lie to be believed, they lie to be repeated.

Republicans got rid of McCarthy. Democrats chose not to save him.

They love authoritarianism, but only when they get to be the authoritarians.

Teach a man to fish, and he’ll sit in a boat all day drinking beer.

“In the future, this lab will be a museum. don’t touch it.”

Cole is on a roll !

Balloon Juice, where there is always someone who will say you’re doing it wrong.

I’m more Christian than these people and I’m an atheist.

In after Baud. Damn.

“That’s what the insurrection act is for!”

Their freedom requires your slavery.

So it was an October Surprise A Day, like an Advent calendar but for crime.

The republican speaker is a slippery little devil.

There are some who say that there are too many strawmen arguments on this blog.

Republicans: slavery is when you own me. freedom is when I own you.

Technically true, but collectively nonsense

I didn’t have alien invasion on my 2023 BINGO card.

And now I have baud making fun of me. this day can’t get worse.

No Justins, No Peace

Mobile Menu

  • Four Directions Montana
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • COVID-19 Coronavirus
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • 2024 Elections
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • Targeted Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Anderson On Health Insurance / Network information and buying decisions

Network information and buying decisions

by David Anderson|  December 5, 20188:34 am| 9 Comments

This post is in: Anderson On Health Insurance

FacebookTweetEmail

Networks are one of the major product differentiators.  If I needed to buy on Exchange, the Blue Cross and Blue Shield of North Carolina network is different than the Cigna network which is different than the Ambetter/Centene network.  Right now, my family is relatively healthy and low touch with the medical system so we would be fairly network agnostic once other factors such as premiums and cost sharing are involved.  However if one of my family members had the medical history that required continual relationships and specialized care, network would become very important in our decision making process.

We would be relying on directories to make choices.  Our purchase choice would be locked in for a year while the directory may or may not be pragmatically accurate at the moment of the decision.  Today’s directory is guaranteed to be inaccurate six months from now.  The question is whether or not it will be materially inaccurate or just “normally” inaccurate.

Wesley Sanders notes that there are few reasons for Exchange insurers to care strongly about their directories:

An inaccurate m provider directory does not qualify as a special enrollment period. An Insurer can lie to you about who will be in network when you buy your plan, and you’re still stuck with them for the whole year

— Wesley Sanders (@wcsanders) December 4, 2018

 

People are locked into their contracts for a year. They can’t leave even if they had strong reason to believe that they were buying a policy with a critical provider set in it and then discover in January or February that those providers are actually not in network. If they made the buy/no buy decision partially on the basis of a particular specialist/hospital set being in the network and then find out that either those providers never were in the network OR their contracts expire early in the policy year, then the actual policy that is bought is materially different than the policy that the buyer reasonably thought they were buying.

As long as we count on individual decision making as a means of unleashing market discipline, then we need to make sure that the variance between what people are thinking that they are buying and what they actually are buying is as small as possible.

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « Wednesday Morning Open Thread: The Blue Wave Moves Forward
Next Post: Site Fundraiser Open Thread »

Reader Interactions

9Comments

  1. 1.

    Another Scott

    December 5, 2018 at 9:06 am

    I’ve had the same BC-BS insurance for about 30 years. It seems to be reasonably well accepted in this area (NoVA). I’m happy with my primary care physician. Were I to think about changing insurance companies, my first stop would be to ask his office “what insurance companies do you accept, and what network do you recommend for specialists that you recommend?”

    Am I being naive to take that approach?

    Yes, the directories should be correct. There’s too much about the US medical care industry that is broken. But “Use the source, Luke!” (i.e. ask the doctors what they accept) would seem to me to be the first stop.

    Thanks.

    Cheers,
    Scott.

  2. 2.

    Matt

    December 5, 2018 at 9:13 am

    [W]e need to make sure that the variance between what people are thinking that they are buying and what they actually are buying is as small as possible

    There’s a tool for that already: laws against fraud. Put a couple insurance execs in the slammer and see how fast those directories get accurate…

  3. 3.

    KateP

    December 5, 2018 at 10:06 am

    I am trying to help my daughter in law yet again and it is so confusing. We are in NE Ohio and comparing plans between Summa Care which is Akron area only and MedMutual of NE OH. On advantage I just brought up to her is the opportunity to use University Hospitals in Cleveland in worse care scenario needing specialty care. I don’t see anything beyond the Summa Hospitals in Akron for the other. Still trying to figure out why the Bronze plan has 0% co-insurance while Silver has 30%.

  4. 4.

    Yarrow

    December 5, 2018 at 10:07 am

    People are locked into their contracts for a year. They can’t leave even if they had strong reason to believe that they were buying a policy with a critical provider set in it and then discover in January or February that those providers are actually not in network. If they made the buy/no buy decision partially on the basis of a particular specialist/hospital set being in the network and then find out that either those providers never were in the network OR their contracts expire early in the policy year, then the actual policy that is bought is materially different than the policy that the buyer reasonably thought they were buying.

    This is terrifying. We have no control and they have all the control. You make the best decision you can with the information available to you but you can still get screwed. There need to be consequences for this happening.

    @Matt:

    There’s a tool for that already: laws against fraud. Put a couple insurance execs in the slammer and see how fast those directories get accurate…

    I wish. Like Kay keeps saying, there’s an epidemic of white collar crime. We need to deal with it.

  5. 5.

    Yarrow

    December 5, 2018 at 10:08 am

    @KateP:

    Still trying to figure out why the Bronze plan has 0% co-insurance while Silver has 30%

    Ran into this as well. It’s absolutely baffling, especially with no deducible.

  6. 6.

    p.a.

    December 5, 2018 at 10:20 am

    One of the laughably absurd bases of modern (or at least Chicago-style school of) economics was the theory of ‘perfect information’ which was then modified by necessity due to overwhelming contrary evidence to ‘sufficient information’. Still AFAIK the meme, now under long term, increasingly successful attack by the behavioral economics cohort.

    Probably the best solution for people who have actual lives to lead is the growth of healthcare sherpas, digital and/or flesh and blood. But just look at the condition of the financial/retirement advice industry to see what dystopian future may await this new industry and its clients.

  7. 7.

    Alex

    December 5, 2018 at 11:32 am

    So, David, if a state insurance regulator wanted to enforce directory accuracy standards, what level of accuracy would be reasonable, and what sort of penalties would make it worthwhile? Would a $10,000 fine for not having a 90% accurate directory for a plan be enough? Should they have to reimburse patients if a listed doctor isn’t in the directory?

  8. 8.

    Wesley

    December 5, 2018 at 3:34 pm

    Alex, $10,000 would be far too little. Centene got fined $250k in Washington and they haven’t changed behavior at all. Needs to be millions, every month, until they fix it.

  9. 9.

    David Anderson

    December 5, 2018 at 3:59 pm

    @Alex: My sledgehammer of god would be three fold:

    1) Insurer would be responsible for claims that are incurred by members who in good faith had a reason to believe that an actually out of network provider was in network at the time a service was received with no member cost sharing.

    2) Directory accuracy based on random audits would be a significant factor in Medicare Advantage stars or Medicaid managed care auto-assignment

    3) At some point of inaccuracy with sufficient time to clean up the process, fraud charges are filed against the CEO and COO in their personal capacities.

Comments are closed.

Primary Sidebar

Recent Comments

  • frosty on War for Ukraine Day 785: Chernihiv Attacked! (Apr 17, 2024 @ 11:59pm)
  • Scout211 on Wednesday News Roundup, A Little Late (Apr 17, 2024 @ 11:58pm)
  • coin operated on Wednesday News Roundup, A Little Late (Apr 17, 2024 @ 11:57pm)
  • Devore on War for Ukraine Day 785: Chernihiv Attacked! (Apr 17, 2024 @ 11:57pm)
  • Ishiyama on Wednesday News Roundup, A Little Late (Apr 17, 2024 @ 11:56pm)

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Balloon Juice Meetups!

All Meetups
Talk of Meetups – Meetup Planning
Proposed BJ meetups list from frosty

Fundraising 2023-24

Wis*Dems Supreme Court + SD-8
Virginia House Races
Four Directions – Montana
Worker Power AZ
Four Directions – Arizona
Four Directions – Nevada

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
Positive Climate News
War in Ukraine
Cole’s “Stories from the Road”
Classified Documents Primer

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Mailing List Signup
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)

Fix Nyms with Apostrophes

Balloon Juice for Ukraine

Donate

Twitter / Spoutible

Balloon Juice (Spoutible)
WaterGirl (Spoutible)
TaMara (Spoutible)
John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
David Anderson
Major Major Major Major
ActualCitizensUnited

Political Action 2024

Postcard Writing Information

Balloon Juice for Four Directions AZ

Donate

Balloon Juice for Four Directions NV

Donate

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2024 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!