• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

Bark louder, little dog.

It’s the corruption, stupid.

A lot of Dems talk about what the media tells them to talk about. Not helpful.

Is it irresponsible to speculate? It is irresponsible not to.

But frankly mr. cole, I’ll be happier when you get back to telling us to go fuck ourselves.

Peak wingnut was a lie.

The worst democrat is better than the best republican.

T R E 4 5 O N

Speaking of republicans, is there a way for a political party to declare intellectual bankruptcy?

Since when do we limit our critiques to things we could do better ourselves?

They love authoritarianism, but only when they get to be the authoritarians.

I’d like to think you all would remain faithful to me if i ever tried to have some of you killed.

Wow, you are pre-disappointed. How surprising.

That’s my take and I am available for criticism at this time.

Only Democrats have agency, apparently.

Let us savor the impending downfall of lawless scoundrels who richly deserve the trouble barreling their way.

Incompetence, fear, or corruption? why not all three?

I’m sure you banged some questionable people yourself.

Damn right I heard that as a threat.

Republicans don’t want a speaker to lead them; they want a hostage.

They are lying in pursuit of an agenda.

People are complicated. Love is not.

He really is that stupid.

A thin legal pretext to veneer over their personal religious and political desires

Mobile Menu

  • Winnable House Races
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • Balloon Juice 2023 Pet Calendar (coming soon)
  • COVID-19 Coronavirus
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • War in Ukraine
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • 2021-22 Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Anderson On Health Insurance / Open Enrollment wraps up

Open Enrollment wraps up

by David Anderson|  December 20, 20189:30 am| 9 Comments

This post is in: Anderson On Health Insurance

FacebookTweetEmail

The Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) released the final initial count of enrollments for Healthcare.gov’s open enrollment period last night.

HealthCare.gov Platform Snapshot Week 7: Dec 9 – Dec 15 Cumulative:  Nov 1-Dec 15
Plan Selections 4,322,450 8,454,882
New Consumers 918,648 2,025,611
Consumers Renewing Coverage 3,403,802 6,429,271
Consumers on Applications Submitted 4,291,903

 

10,612,387

Total plans purchased went down by 368,000 before the data gets cleaned up. Assuming this year looks like most other years, I expect to lose a net 50,000-100,000 more enrollments after files are reconciled. Charles Gaba has a very helpful chart that lays out the details year over year:

There are two things to note that I think tell the stories of enrollment. I am speculating wildly with little to no direct evidence but I think I have reasonably well grounded intuition.

The first story is that the renewals went up by a minuscule amount. We know that more people are being exposed to Silver Loaded and Silver Gapped deals due to Cost Sharing Reduction (CSR) subsidies having been terminated and baked into the premium structures. This is not uniform. It was a plus in North Carolina and Iowa but a big minus in Philadelphia and Phoenix.

Pricing for subsidized folks was an enrollment driver:

More states are silver-loading. Colorado and Delaware shifted from a broad-load of CSRs, meaning that CSR costs were incorporated into the premiums for all plans, to a silver load of CSR costs. North Dakota and Vermont are incorporating CSR costs into premiums for the first time. These steps will increase the value proposition for subsidized buyers.

The other story is to look at the new enrollees. This year saw a 15% decline in new enrollees.

I think this is a sign that the repeal of the individual mandate as well as increased focus on expanding eligibility for underwritten plans is working as expected.

I am speculating wildly right now.

I think that once someone shows up on Healthcare.gov, the odds of converting an account creation or even a windowshopping moment into a plan purchase is as high if not higher this year than in past years. The pricing due to CSR termination creates a lot of high value proposition deals. However the odds of someone who is potentially in the individual market for health insurance actually going to Healthcare.gov is lower this year than in prior years.

That is speculation. I think it is reasonable speculation but it is not evidence based (yet).

Overall, given the environment, this is a surprisingly strong end of the open enrollment period enrollment report for Healthcare.gov.

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « Bring It (Open Thread)
Next Post: Shutdown? Shut up! (Open Thread) »

Reader Interactions

9Comments

  1. 1.

    stinger

    December 20, 2018 at 10:00 am

    I always value your analyses.

    David, if we went to Medicare for All or some simple, straightforward system where all Americans have basic health coverage at an affordable cost, would you have to become a full-time soccer ref?

  2. 2.

    David Anderson

    December 20, 2018 at 11:02 am

    @stinger: Nope, my knees won’t let me do that full time again… I am no longer 29

    And honestly, there will never be anything straight forward about the US healthcare system. I can find some interesting question to poke and probe on for a very long time.

  3. 3.

    Brachiator

    December 20, 2018 at 11:08 am

    I wonder. Has there been an increase in the number of people getting health insurance through an employer?

  4. 4.

    David Anderson

    December 20, 2018 at 11:24 am

    @Brachiator: I would not be surprised if some of the enrollment loss on HC.Gov is due to more people being employed. That would make a lot of mechanical sense.

    Another 100,000-130,000 enrollments lost can be explained by Maine and Virginia expanding Medicaid. People who would have bought an ACA plan are now going to be covered by Medicaid expansion.

    Once factoring out Medicaid expansion, we’re looking at maybe 250,000 few net enrollments than 2018

  5. 5.

    Mary G

    December 20, 2018 at 11:41 am

    So appreciate all the Democrats who knew that they would very probably lose their jobs and still voted in the ACA, which wasn’t everything we wanted, but the crucial first step that the party had been trying to get done since FDR. And Nancy SMASH who got this done and held every one of her herd of cats in the resistance to every Republican vote to kill or wound it. I thought it was a goner when the 62 million idiots gave away the country in November 2016, and it’s damaged for sure, but still limping along.

  6. 6.

    Ted Doolittle

    December 20, 2018 at 1:09 pm

    The failure of many consumers to understand the good deals available to the subsidized population is why the Connecticut Office of the Healthcare Advocate is recommending that the General Assembly look at requiring all health insurance purchases — ACA or not, and including the alternative plans such as Association Plans and Short-Term Limited Duration plans, and others — to go through the Exchange website in some way.

  7. 7.

    stinger

    December 20, 2018 at 1:09 pm

    @Mary G: Yes, every word of this.

  8. 8.

    Juice Box

    December 20, 2018 at 1:56 pm

    California doesn’t close open enrollment until 1/15/19. It’s not that we’re naturally slow, we just want everybody to have a chance to vote and enroll. Also, there are a lot of us.

  9. 9.

    ccswood

    December 27, 2018 at 3:13 pm

    Do you expect the Hurricane Michael extension to have a significant impact?

    https://politics.myajc.com/news/state–regional-govt–politics/dozens-georgia-counties-get-obamacare-enrollment-extension/x1zHZh07Nu2rxjXT3rWe6M/

Comments are closed.

Primary Sidebar

Recent Comments

  • dr. luba on War for Ukraine Day 402: Putin Has Signed a New Foreign Policy Concept. (Apr 1, 2023 @ 11:17pm)
  • Jackie on Saturday Afternoon Open Thread (and reminder, BJ zoom tonight at 7 pm) (Apr 1, 2023 @ 11:14pm)
  • Hangö Kex on War for Ukraine Day 402: Putin Has Signed a New Foreign Policy Concept. (Apr 1, 2023 @ 11:14pm)
  • Jager on War for Ukraine Day 402: Putin Has Signed a New Foreign Policy Concept. (Apr 1, 2023 @ 10:57pm)
  • Bill Arnold on War for Ukraine Day 402: Putin Has Signed a New Foreign Policy Concept. (Apr 1, 2023 @ 10:57pm)

Balloon Juice Meetups!

All Meetups
Seattle Meetup coming up on April 4!

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

Fundraising 2023-24

Wis*Dems Supreme Court + SD-8

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
We All Need A Little Kindness
Classified Documents: A Primer
State & Local Elections Discussion

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Mailing List Signup
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)

Twitter / Spoutible

Balloon Juice (Spoutible)
WaterGirl (Spoutible)
TaMara (Spoutible)
John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
TaMara
David Anderson
Major Major Major Major
ActualCitizensUnited

Join the Fight!

Join the Fight Signup Form
All Join the Fight Posts

Balloon Juice Events

5/14  The Apocalypse
5/20  Home Away from Home
5/29  We’re Back, Baby
7/21  Merging!

Balloon Juice for Ukraine

Donate

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2023 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!