Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

A snarling mass of vitriolic jackals

Republicans seem to think life begins at the candlelight dinner the night before.

You cannot shame the shameless.

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

Usually wrong but never in doubt

“Everybody’s entitled to be an idiot.”

Impressively dumb. Congratulations.

Give the craziest people you know everything they want and hope they don’t ask for more? Great plan.

That’s my take and I am available for criticism at this time.

I see no possible difficulties whatsoever with this fool-proof plan.

If senate republicans had any shame, they’d die of it.

“Jesus paying for the sins of everyone is an insult to those who paid for their own sins.”

Good lord, these people are nuts.

A lot of Dems talk about what the media tells them to talk about. Not helpful.

Whatever happens next week, the fight doesn’t end.

Yeah, with this crowd one never knows.

… riddled with inexplicable and elementary errors of law and fact

Accountability, motherfuckers.

Incompetence, fear, or corruption? why not all three?

Conservatism: there are some people the law protects but does not bind and others who the law binds but does not protect.

Happy indictment week to all who celebrate!

When do we start airlifting the women and children out of Texas?

Too often we confuse noise with substance. too often we confuse setbacks with defeat.

Within six months Twitter will be fully self-driving.

You are here: Home / Open Threads / Excellent Links / Late Night Memorial Open Thread: Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Cannot yet RIP

Late Night Memorial Open Thread: Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Cannot yet RIP

by | 19 Comments

This post is in: , , , , ,


… In the official story told to children, King’s assassination is the transformational tragedy in a victorious struggle to overcome. But in the true accounting, his assassination was one of a host of reactionary assaults by a country against a revolution. And those assaults were astonishingly successful…

King spoke of a “white backlash”—a term he helped popularize—to his movement. But in retrospect, the strength of the reaction he predicted and endured often receives short shrift. The support of white moderates who recoiled at images of Negro children sprayed by hoses and attacked by dogs was instrumental in passing laws that ended legal segregation and protected voting rights. But by 1966, it had become clear that many of these whites chafed against further activism and greater demands for equality. They viewed the Voting Rights Act as a final concession; King saw it as a start. According to Gallup polls, King’s popularity waned in the coda years of his life; his unfavorability rating reached 63 percent in 1966. At the same time, public opinion turned firmly against the civil-rights movement…

… For white America, hostility toward the civil-rights movement turned into a cherry-picked celebration of the revolution’s victories over segregation and over easily caricatured, gap-toothed bigots in the South. Embracing King became a way to rejoice in overcoming and to reify white innocence, even while ignoring the cries of those who had certainly not overcome. Accordingly, the life of King past mid-1965, a radical three years spent fighting a tide that had turned against him, is barely mentioned today…

In a 1978 retrospective article on King, Baldwin looked back at his friend’s life and at how the country had changed since his murder. “A vast amount of love and faith and passion—and blood—have gone into the attempt to transform and liberate this nation,” Baldwin wrote. “This is not the land of the free, is only very unwillingly and sporadically the home of the brave, and all that can be said for the bulk of our politicians is that, if they are no worse than they were, they are certainly no better.”

How much has changed in the 40 years since that retrospective? Have politicians improved? If King were alive today, would he bask in the glow of achievement, or would he gird himself again to march?…

Reader Interactions

19Comments

  1. 1.

    Adam L Silverman

    Did you mean to include Congressman Steve King’s (R-IA) tweet in there without any comment on the fact that Steve King is commenting on MLK?

  4. 4.

    AThornton

    @mvr:

    The Right Wing specializes in misquoting people and then using it against them.

    **********************************************************************************************************************

    And I was promised a 1980s Hasbro commercial for their GI Joe APC toy 3 threads back and I had to go find it myself.

    “Full service blog” indeed.

    *Har-rumph*

  5. 5.

    ??? Goku (aka Amerikan Baka)  ??

    @Adam L Silverman:
    He must be trying to improve his image. I see it as a hail mary to save his committee assignments. An Iowan congressman isn’t worth anything if he’s not on the Agricultural committee or so I’ve heard. I assume the caucus vote to remove him failed.

  6. 6.

    Plato

    So the racist totus thug has been getting away with it all since 1973? That’s over four decades of systematic failures.

  9. 9.

    ??? Goku (aka Amerikan Baka)  ??

    @Ruckus:

    Is ole Stevie trying to get his committee assignments reinstated by one bullshit tweet?

    Were they ever taken away in the first place? I understand the full GOP House caucus needed to vote unanimously to remove him from them. I have a hard time seeing that happening given some of the shitheads in the R House.

  14. 14.

    Mike G

    Winchester .30-06 rifle…The store that sold it is still in business today.

    And I’ll bet they pull a lot of business by bragging about that sale.

  15. 15.

    Jim, Foolish Literalist

    Matt Fuller @ MEPFuller
    Isn’t it ~interesting~ that none of the first-person accounts of the White House present Trump as, like, the 3D chess player some supporters believe he is.
    Every account is him watching TV, sipping Diet Coke, and wandering out of meetings with Paul Ryan.

    another ex-staffer, another book

  17. 17.

    Jim, Foolish Literalist

    @Jim, Foolish Literalist:

    President Trump watched on television, increasingly angry as House Speaker Paul D. Ryan criticized his handling of the deadly white supremacist rally in Charlottesville. He held the remote control “like a pistol” and yelled for an assistant to get the Republican leader on the phone.
    “Paul, do you know why Democrats have been kicking your a– for decades? Because they know a little word called ‘loyalty,’ ” Trump told Ryan, then a Wisconsin congressman. “Why do you think Nancy [Pelosi] has held on this long? Have you seen her? She’s a disaster. Every time she opens her mouth another Republican gets elected. But they stick with her . . . Why can’t you be loyal to your president, Paul?”
    The tormenting continued. Trump recalled Ryan distancing himself from Trump in October 2016, in the days after the “Access Hollywood” video in which he bragged of fondling women first surfaced in The Washington Post.
    “I remember being in Wisconsin and your own people were booing you,” Trump told him, according to former West Wing communications aide Cliff Sims. “You were out there dying like a dog, Paul. Like a dog! And what’d I do? I saved your a–.”

  18. 18.

    Cthulhu

    Yeah, because if MLK had a concealed pistol, he could have totally taken out James Earl Ray and his rifle.

  19. 19.

    justawriter

    @Cthulhu: At the rate we are going, if cheeto-face wins in 2020, the official story in 2023 will be JER was a disaffected black panther who killed MLK for supporting father Trump against racists who were forcing him to rent to black people. Then again, given the history of the last two years, I probably underestimated how awful the next five years could be.

Comments are closed.