• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

The republican caucus is covering themselves with something, and it’s not glory.

Republicans in disarray!

Putin must be throwing ketchup at the walls.

Republicans want to make it harder to vote and easier for them to cheat.

You don’t get rid of your umbrella while it’s still raining.

Fani Willis claps back at Trump chihuahua, Jim Jordan.

if you can’t see it, then you are useless in the fight to stop it.

You cannot shame the shameless.

They’re not red states to be hated; they are voter suppression states to be fixed.

Many life forms that would benefit from greater intelligence, sadly, do not have it.

President Biden is doing good where he can, and getting it done.

Compromise? There is no middle ground between a firefighter and an arsonist.

Reality always lies in wait for … Democrats.

They think we are photo bombing their nice little lives.

“But what about the lurkers?”

“The defense has a certain level of trust in defendant that the government does not.”

We cannot abandon the truth and remain a free nation.

There is no right way to do the wrong thing.

Authoritarian republicans are opposed to freedom for the rest of us.

Never entrust democracy to any process that requires Republicans to act in good faith.

Roe isn’t about choice, it’s about freedom.

If West Virginia and San Francisco had a love child.

He imagines himself as The Big Bad, Who Is Universally Feared… instead of The Big Jagoff, Who Is Universally Mocked.

Hey Washington Post, “Democracy Dies in Darkness” is supposed to be a warning, not a mission statement.

Mobile Menu

  • Four Directions Montana
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • COVID-19 Coronavirus
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • 2024 Elections
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • Targeted Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Anderson On Health Insurance / Medicaid block grants (Tennessee Edition)

Medicaid block grants (Tennessee Edition)

by David Anderson|  May 6, 20197:31 am| 7 Comments

This post is in: Anderson On Health Insurance

FacebookTweetEmail

Late last week, Politico reported that Tennessee is about ready to jump head first into asking for a Medicaid block grant for the traditional federal matching rate populations.

More than 1.3 million people are enrolled in Tennessee’s Medicaid program, known as TennCare, and the state is one of 14 that has not joined Obamacare’s Medicaid expansion for low-income adults. The federal government on average covers about two-thirds of Medicaid costs in Tennessee…
State Republican lawmakers on Thursday, emboldened by the Trump administration’s promise to provide states with more flexibility to run their Medicaid programs, approved legislation requiring Tennessee to submit a Medicaid block grant plan to the federal government within six months. The legislation now goes to Republican Gov. Bill Lee, who will sign the bill

The logic of a block grant is that Tennessee has weak incentives to save money. Right now, if Tennessee spends a dollar, the Feds kick in two bucks. If Tennessee works hard to save three dollars, they only get to keep a buck. A block grant means that Tennessee is on the hook for every marginal dollar spent and Tennessee can keep all the savings from its efforts to reduce spending.

There are several major problems with block grants. The first and the biggest is that block grants are not responsive to shocks. Shocks can be anything; they can be a major storm like Hurricane Maria in Puerto Rico, they can be mass unemployment like 2008-2009, they can be a new technology like Hep-C cures or they can be a new disease like Zika.

December 2016 I wrote about Zika and block grants:

We also know that locally transmitted Zika infections will not be uniformly distributed. Alaska will have far fewer proportional Zika infections than Florida…
The Medicaid block grant procedures would give states a fixed head payment for each enrollee. It could vary by category of assistance and a few other criteria but the fee would be flat within subgroups by the number of enrollees….
here is where there is a problem. The capitated payments would be based on average expected costs in year 1 and then get weaker. States with disproportionate clustering of high cost conditions will be significantly worse off. Long run Zika neurological impairments will hit warmer states’ Medicaid budgets much harder and more disproportionally than Zika will hit cold weather states’ Medicaid budgets. This could be adjusted for by having a Zika bump in the block grant calculation much like there could be a diabetes bump or a maternity bump or any other number of risk adjusted bumps to capitation payments. But what happens when there is a new high cost and very concentrated disease that will have major impact on a few states’ Medicaid budgets? The block grant system fails unless there is a side payment of new federal funds…

Block grants are not designed to respond to negative shocks.

Secondly, even if the block grants are designed reasonably well and are risk adjusted, nasty incentives to selectively deny care will pop up. Risk adjustment will frequently fail at the individual level even if it is good at the group level. For example, hemophilia is risk adjusted in the ACA at between 61 and 62 times average state monthly premium for the 2020 individual market. That translates to about $455,600 dollars using 2019 Open Enrollment average premiums. We know hemophilia has an extreme tail. Some boys with this coagulation disorder can be treated for significantly under the mean cost of care. There are a few predictable, multi-million dollar claims as we have discussed before. A block grant structure (even if risk adjusted) would strongly encourage a state to place treatment limitations and caps on care to limit the outlier expense. The incentive for the state would be stronger to drive extreme and persistent cost outliers to move out of state and become someone else’s problem.

I’m using hemophilia as the cleanest example of something that is both expensive and highly variant. Less expensive conditions with high variance also invite risk adjustment games where the state is happy to pay for folks who have predictable below average costs while running off the folks who have above average costs but who also provide a good amount of the risk adjustment value.

The other major problem with block grants is that they are often linked to “flexibility” which means easier service cuts. Expensive services that help few people and are not seen as randomly distributed and randomly occurring would be the logical target of a state trying to spend as little as possible while not angering too many people.

It is possible to design a block grant program that is responsive to shocks, risk adjusts well at the group level with appropriate secondary payments to handle outliers and provide greater flexibility while improving care. It is possible. It is not the priority of any of the block grant programs that have been submitted to Congress in the past three years.

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « On the Road and In Your Backyard
Next Post: Objectivity »

Reader Interactions

7Comments

  1. 1.

    rikyrah

    May 6, 2019 at 9:16 am

    Block grants are a SCAM…
    Pure SCAM

  2. 2.

    laura

    May 6, 2019 at 10:14 am

    Block Grants allow states to be as cruel as they want to groups they wish to warm or let die, or straight up kill.
    Can we have a new Royal Baby thread please?

  3. 3.

    Anonymous At Work

    May 6, 2019 at 10:36 am

    I foresee Tennessee having some real issues with sickle cell patients 3 hours after it receives the block grant. Just gotta lay that out there.

  4. 4.

    David Anderson

    May 6, 2019 at 11:19 am

    @Anonymous At Work: Yep, and anyone who is a good candidate for CAR-T therapy and genetic cures will have incredible paperwork barriers in their way.

  5. 5.

    Gretchen

    May 6, 2019 at 11:54 am

    Kansas just rejected Medicaid expansion by one vote. I don’t understand why our state legislators don’t want to get our federal tax dollars back and are fine with rural hospitals closing.

  6. 6.

    Kitty

    May 6, 2019 at 3:32 pm

    You left out the part where State Troopers locked the Chamber to prevent Democrats from leaving because so many Republicans left for the weekend, and they needed the Dems for a quorum. https://www.wbir.com/article/news/local/tenn-lawmaker-shocked-democrats-were-locked-in-house-chamber/51-1e85f9d6-0206-4b21-84e4-a9457f3fa27e

  7. 7.

    Ohio Mom

    May 6, 2019 at 5:35 pm

    Thanks for this post, David. It’s full of good ammunition for calls to my reps in Columbus.

    I suspect when most people hear “Medicaid,” they think of impoverished (Black of course ?) mothers and children, and frail elderly people in nursing homes.

    But (I know David knows this part, it’s for anyone else happening by) Medicaid also funds the lives of disabled adults: it pays for everything from group homes and other supported living arrangements, to transportation, day programs, and job coaching and other employment supports, as well as (duh) health care.

    States have some leeway in how they define who is disabled enough to receive Medicaid funding. Any state adopting block granting will sooner or later feel pressure to rewrite their eligibility requirements to push people off the rolls. It will be a race to the bottom for the disability community.

Comments are closed.

Primary Sidebar

Recent Comments

  • Aussie Sheila on Late Night Weekend Wrap-Up Open Thread: Journamalism, Not A Dependable Profit Center (Apr 15, 2024 @ 5:12am)
  • Baud on Late Night Weekend Wrap-Up Open Thread: Journamalism, Not A Dependable Profit Center (Apr 15, 2024 @ 5:06am)
  • SpaceUnit on Late Night Weekend Wrap-Up Open Thread: Journamalism, Not A Dependable Profit Center (Apr 15, 2024 @ 5:03am)
  • Chet Murthy on Late Night Weekend Wrap-Up Open Thread: Journamalism, Not A Dependable Profit Center (Apr 15, 2024 @ 5:02am)
  • Aussie Sheila on Late Night Weekend Wrap-Up Open Thread: Journamalism, Not A Dependable Profit Center (Apr 15, 2024 @ 4:54am)

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Balloon Juice Meetups!

All Meetups
Talk of Meetups – Meetup Planning
Proposed BJ meetups list from frosty

Fundraising 2023-24

Wis*Dems Supreme Court + SD-8
Virginia House Races
Four Directions – Montana
Worker Power AZ
Four Directions – Arizona
Four Directions – Nevada

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
Positive Climate News
War in Ukraine
Cole’s “Stories from the Road”
Classified Documents Primer

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Mailing List Signup
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)

Fix Nyms with Apostrophes

Balloon Juice for Ukraine

Donate

Twitter / Spoutible

Balloon Juice (Spoutible)
WaterGirl (Spoutible)
TaMara (Spoutible)
John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
David Anderson
Major Major Major Major
ActualCitizensUnited

Political Action 2024

Postcard Writing Information

Balloon Juice for Four Directions AZ

Donate

Balloon Juice for Four Directions NV

Donate

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2024 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!