(pp 14-35)
Much of this chapter is redacted under “Harm to Ongoing Matter,” (HOM) presumably referring to the court case against 13 employees of the Internet Research Agency (IRA). A few redactions are labeled “Personal Privacy” (PP) and “Investigative Technique,” (IT) and there seems no need to try to decipher them.
The unredacted part of the chapter is a story that has appeared in the news many times. I’ll outline it and provide a few juicy quotes.
The IRA is funded by Yevgeniy Viktorovich Prigozhin and companies he controlled, including Concord Management and Consulting LLC and Concord Catering. It conducted social media operations in the United States with objectives of sowing discord and later electing Donald Trump president, starting in at least 2014. By February 2016, the IRA was supporting Trump against Clinton. Proghozin was sanctioned by the US Treasury Department in December 2016.
The operations included running accounts on Twitter, Facebook, and Instagram, holding rallies, and buying advertisements. The accounts looked like they belonged to individuals, groups, and activists of various sorts – rightwing, black, political, and religious. The IRA also ran a bot network on Twitter to amplify their messages. By the end of the 2016 election, they had reached millions of people.
(testimony of Colin Stretch, General Counsel of Facebook) (“We estimate that roughly 29 million people were served content in their News Feeds directly from the IRA’s 80,000 posts over the two years. Posts from these Pages were also shared, liked, and followed by people on Facebook, and, as a result, three times more people may have been exposed to a story that originated from the Russian operation. Our best estimate is that approximately 126 million people may have been served content from a Page associated with the IRA at some point during the two-year period.”). The Facebook representative also testified that Facebook had identified 170 Instagram accounts that posted approximately 120,000 pieces of content during that time. Facebook did not offer an estimate of the audience reached via Instagram. (Footnote 6, p. 15)
The chapter contains numerous specific examples of tweets and other social media from the IRA, including @TEN_ GOP, which pretended to be “the informal voice of the Tennessee GOP,” and “Miners for Trump,” which held rallies in Pennsylvania.
“Main idea: Use any opportunity to criticize Hillary [Clinton] and the rest (except Sanders and Trump – we support them)”
The IRA recruited Americans across the political spectrum to help spread its message. This section, starting on page 31, also contains both HOM and PP redactions. Members of the Trump campaign shared or retweeted IRA matter. Donald Trump Jr., Eric Trump, Kellyanne Conway, Brad Parscale, and Michael T. Flynn all retweeted IRA tweets against Hillary Clinton.
IRA employees also tried to contact Trump campaign members directly, representing themselves as US persons. The IRA’s contacts included requests for signs and other materials for rallies and requests to promote the rallies and help coordinate Iogistics. Some campaign volunteers agreed to provide the requested support (for example, agreeing to set aside a number of signs), the investigation has not identified evidence that any Trump campaign official understood the requests were coming from foreign nationals.
A name that may be worth keeping in the back of your mind is “Project Lakhta,” which is mentioned as a larger project that includes the IRA operations. The rest of that paragraph is redacted.
TenguPhule
Must resist obvious joke.
Smedley Darlington Prunebanks (formerly Mumphrey, et al.)
Off topic, but an advice columnist named E. Jean Carroll has publicly accused Donald Tяump of sexually assaulting her about 20 or 25 years ago, though from what she says happened, it sounds more like rape. Seems worthy of a post.
Dorothy A. Winsor
@Smedley Darlington Prunebanks (formerly Mumphrey, et al.): Is it too cynical to say I think Trump as a sexual assaulter is already factored into his image? I can’t imagine it will matter.
Cheryl Rofer
@Smedley Darlington Prunebanks (formerly Mumphrey, et al.): I agree with Dorothy A. Winsor: This particular allegation is new and horrifying, but we already knew Trump was a rapist. I’m also seeing some degree of apparent surprise on Twitter. But the public and the media seemingly decided during the earlier revelations that this was not a problem.
Perhaps a post might discuss the casual dismissal of the indications that our president’s past history includes rape and boasting about it.
rikyrah
@Dorothy A. Winsor:
I don’t think it will matter either. Those of us who cared about that didn’t vote for him, and those who voted for him showed their lack of character by their vote for him.
J R in WV
@TenguPhule:
Why fight it!
Or, “Hello, friend, I need some Trump Make America Great Again signs, please.” In plain English, this time.
No one could suspect that first guy isn’t an American working to make Trump president!!
ETA: I used Google Translate, so don’t hit me too hard for the almost certain errors in that Russian version!
J R in WV
There are always people who didn’t hear a clear and obvious accusation at the time, and those folks may be surprised and disturbed by hearing it this time. After all, lots of folks are disappointed in their President by now. I don’t know if it’s going to make much difference.
This is a clearly horrific event, the description is clear and specific, there’s no beating around the bush about what he did. So maybe it will make a difference, along with the kids in concentration camps, the lack of safe and sanitary conditions, etc.
The woman lawyer we saw being quizzed by three federal judges, she had trouble keeping a straight face while making the arguments her bosses sent her there to make. I was actually a little surprised by the end of the questioning that she didn’t apologize to the judges and announce her resignation, as the case she was told to make was obviously phony and fraudulent, that these kids were obviously being mistreated in every way.
She will never live that video down, ever. She is truly a nazi, helping normalize fascist concentration camp treatment of innocent kids who obviously deserve asylum, if only they knew the magic words to request it. Who is going to want to date that kind of person? Or accept them as a customer for hair styling, or dental work, or as a medical patient? Bake a wedding cake for … oh wait, she won’t need that, will she?
MJS
This is off topic, but in the last two days, we’ve had 1) a witness who worked for Trump testify that he would definitely take things of value from a foreign government if it would help his campaign; 2) this administration argue in court that providing toothbrushes and soap to those being detained is not necessary for a “safe and sanitary” environment; 3) Trump call for, then call off, an attack on Iran; 4) Trump threaten a reporter with imprisonment for taking a picture of a letter Trump showed him; and 5) an announcement that ICE will now be rounding up immigrant families. I’m sure there are other things I’ve missed.
Speaker Pelosi and other reluctant members of Congress, we can’t wait any longer.
rikyrah
@Smedley Darlington Prunebanks (formerly Mumphrey, et al.):
I believe her. Then again, I believed the other 15 that accused him.
realbtl
@J R in WV: I keep seeing Boris and Natasha- They’ll never rekoknise us in these disguises.
prostratedragon
@MJS: This just in:
Court Unseals Manafort Docs, Revealing Texts With Hannity
Hell, I’ll say it anyway: Today!
Cheryl Rofer
Meanwhile, on the other side of the pond…
Mandalay
Yesterday’s stunning news was that Trump was the adult in the room. Today’s stunning news is that Trump is classier than Britain’s next prime minister….
chris
@Cheryl Rofer: I sounds very much as if the cops tried to cover it up.
ETA: And what Mandalay said
TenguPhule
@J R in WV:
Sadly, we know where she’ll find them. They’re the ones suing to get out of union dues, catering to same sex couples, paying for medical insurance which allows women to get abortions.
There are millions of them.
zhena gogolia
Are people reading the Mueller Report? I’m trying to keep up!
Cheryl Rofer
@zhena gogolia: It’s been slow going so far, setting out the particulars of the investigation, and not much new in the IRA section. The next section gets a little more interesting. Like many great works of literature, it builds slowly.
Mandalay
@chris:
Yes, they initially attempted a cover up…:
TenguPhule
I don’t believe them. There is no fucking way they’re detaining them in hotels based on their authorized budget. Where are they really going to send them?
debbie
@Dorothy A. Winsor:
Silly. That’s just “locker room talk.” //
Steve in the ATL
@TenguPhule: could be 2 or 3 star hotels, though that would violate the “safe and sanitary” requirement. We’re talking *no* room service.
Hob
@Dorothy A. Winsor: @Cheryl Rofer: Carroll’s piece includes a discussion of exactly that. She doesn’t expect it to make a difference to his supporters, and acknowledges that they may even think it’s great.
@Smedley Darlington Prunebanks (formerly Mumphrey, et al.): Rape is a form of sexual assault, so I’m not sure what distinction you’re trying to make.