• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

In after Baud. Damn.

No one could have predicted…

We can’t confuse what’s necessary to win elections with the policies that we want to implement when we do.

Nothing worth doing is easy.

Let’s delete this post and never speak of this again.

I’ve spoken to my cat about this, but it doesn’t seem to do any good.

You don’t get rid of your umbrella while it’s still raining.

We can show the world that autocracy can be defeated.

One way or another, he’s a liar.

Do we throw up our hands or do we roll up our sleeves? (hint, door #2)

Their freedom requires your slavery.

Not rolling over. fuck you, make me.

We cannot abandon the truth and remain a free nation.

If you’re gonna whine, it’s time to resign!

The fundamental promise of conservatism all over the world is a return to an idealized past that never existed.

No Kings: Americans standing in the way of bad history saying “Oh, Fuck No!”

Mediocre white men think RFK Jr’s pathetic midlife crisis is inspirational. The bar is set so low for them, it’s subterranean.

When tyranny becomes law, rebellion becomes duty. ~Thomas Jefferson

Republicans seem to think life begins at the candlelight dinner the night before.

Let’s not be the monsters we hate.

I would try pessimism, but it probably wouldn’t work.

Usually wrong but never in doubt

The poor and middle-class pay taxes, the rich pay accountants, the wealthy pay politicians.

The worst democrat is better than the best republican.

Mobile Menu

  • Seattle Meet-up Post
  • 2025 Activism
  • Targeted Political Fundraising
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • COVID-19
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • 2025 Activism
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • Targeted Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Anderson On Health Insurance / Arizona, MLR and pay-fors?

Arizona, MLR and pay-fors?

by David Anderson|  September 10, 20197:32 am| 7 Comments

This post is in: Anderson On Health Insurance

FacebookTweetEmail

Charles Gaba is pulling estimates for Medical Loss Ratio rebates in all states. He posted some eye-popping numbers from Arizona.

Individual market MLR rebates skyrocketed from 101,000 enrollees receiving $16.2 million last year to 96,000 receiving a whoping $92.3 million…averaging $959 apiece!
Nearly all of this comes from Health Net of Arizona…operating under the “Ambetter from Arizona Complete Health” (Ambetter, aka Centene, bought out Health Net last year…confused yet?).

It is a single insurer, Centene/Ambetter/HealthNet, that is driving almost all of the Medical Loss Ratio rebates for 2016-2018 that are currently being paid out now. Some folks will be getting checks back that are much larger than the net of subsidy premiums that they paid in.

  • Medical Loss Ratio can be seen as the difference between how an insurer priced and how it should have priced with perfect information
  • MLR rebates to subsidized buyers can be seen as a double dip on top of premium tax credits
  • Switching the landing spot of MLR rebates for subsidized folks to the US Treasury could be a significant pay-for

MLR rebates are paid to policy holders who had a plan during the last year of the three year cycle.  The rebate is a gap filler between the actual claims expense ratio to the floor ratio of 80% in the individual and small group markets.  The rebates are sent to each policy holder in proportion to the total gross premium that they generated for the insurer.  Older buyers with large families who bought more expensive plans get a larger rebate check than a single twenty two year old buying the cheapest plan possible.

This does weird things that we need to think about.

MLR rebates are a post-facto correction for actuarial errors.  MLR rebates are paid out when the insurer significantly overpriced their premiums relative to claims.  The rebate brings the net collected premium back to within the normal range.  There is a significant delay and the distribution is funky, but this is the fundamental mechanic occuring when an insurer pays out MLR rebates.

Advanced premium tax credits (APTC) are paid out to the 100-400% Federal Poverty Level (FPL) insured in order to allow them to buy “affordable” insurance.  The APTC is calculated based on the premiums that the insured saw at the purchasing decision point.  If an insurer is sending out significant MLR rebate checks, that means the MLR check recipient, if subsidized, may have had their APTC based on over-inflated premiums.  They already benefited from higher than real APTC payments through no fault of their own.  An MLR check to someone who received APTC is a legal, double dip.

Non-subsidized enrollees who receive an MLR check are merely being made whole from paying too high of a premium completely out of their own pocket.

I think there is a good policy argument that the US Treasury should be at least a beneficiary of MLR rebates that are earned to individuals who receive APTC subsidies.  The Treasury paid too much in APTC on the original round of insurance choice.  Rejiggering the rebate formula so that MLR rebates are distributed in proportion to total paid premium by source could generate several hundred million dollars in pay-fors for the US Treasury.  A half billion dollar pay-for is a decent size downpayment for national reinsurance for catastrophic, multi-million dollar claims that are likely to become more common in the future.

When MLR was orginally designed, it was primarily intended to function as both a heavy club to beat up on the worse operators in the underwritten insurance space, seem to be a populist measure of beating up on all evil bastard insurers, and then from a more realistic point of view, pick up a little bit of actuarial/statistical noise every year.  The 2018 initiation of Silverloading was a major pricing shock combined with incredible policy uncertainty led to the proliferation of the possibilities of zero and net negative premiums.  Those consequences are unintended, weird and introduce potentially distortions to the market.   Congressional action to reroute MLR rebates as a function of net payment would remove some of the potential distortions.

 

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « On The Road
Next Post: Respite Open Thread: Maysie and Tux Update Respite Open Thread: Maysie and Tux Update 1»

Reader Interactions

7Comments

  1. 1.

    dnfree

    September 10, 2019 at 8:35 am

    Good point on subsidized buyers.

  2. 2.

    p.a.

    September 10, 2019 at 9:05 am

    We know MLR and ACA as a whole will need tweaks in perpetuity while there is a political party based from Planet Zippy. They will always try to sabotage by means direct and indirect, forever. Still trying to destroy Social Security what, 5 generations on.
    On a personal note, if the Treasury can get some relief I’m ok with it, but if the subsidized continue to get a little extra dip into the well, I’m ok with some wealth redistribution in THAT direction for a change.

  3. 3.

    David Anderson

    September 10, 2019 at 9:32 am

    @p.a.: I can see everything you are saying. Negative Premium Plans just seem weird to me and quite distortive to functional markets.

  4. 4.

    Yutsano

    September 10, 2019 at 9:50 am

    Okay, I might be missing something, but based upon what you’re saying the Treasury is already recouping at least some of the overpayment of the premium tax credit. If the taxpayer uses more than the allowed PTC for their insurance policy, they’re required to pay back the difference within the repayment limitations. I’m going by the form 8962 (which is a complicated mess and should be shot into the sun) which has the TP calculate that themselves. Am I missing something you’re talking about here?

  5. 5.

    David Anderson

    September 10, 2019 at 10:03 am

    @Yutsano: Slightly different thing. Form 8962 comes into play when a tax payer mis-estimates their income and gets more APTC than they are entitled to. That is recouped on the back-end when the tax payer files a return.

    What I’m talking about here is when a tax payer correctly estimates their income but the insurer effectively over-estimates the amount of premiums needed to cover claims. The APTC is driven off of the interaction of the income estimate and the premium. Currently, if the premium estimate is really off, all of the refunds flow to the policy holders and not the policy payers.

  6. 6.

    Starfish

    September 10, 2019 at 11:22 am

    I know people might be excited about these rebate checks, but people not being able to afford both their co-pays and their insurance prices is a problem that is going to have people forgoing necessary care potentially making people worse off. There should be a way to encourage insurance companies to be better at math.

  7. 7.

    Jack

    September 17, 2019 at 5:44 pm

    Poor folks who did the responsible thing and being the beneficiary of unearned luck! OH THE HUMANITY!

    I guess we’ll have to go to Medicare-For-All so that these Lucky Duckies don’t get anything!

Comments are closed.

Primary Sidebar

On The Road - way2blue - SINALEI, SAMOA—RESPITE EDITION—FEBRUARY 2025.  (second of five) 7
Image by way2blue (7/13/25)

World Central Kitchen

Donate

Recent Comments

  • Ramona on Late Night Open Thread: Buyer’s Remorse (Jul 14, 2025 @ 1:35am)
  • Ksmiami on Late Night Open Thread: Buyer’s Remorse (Jul 14, 2025 @ 1:33am)
  • Ramona on Late Night Open Thread: Buyer’s Remorse (Jul 14, 2025 @ 1:27am)
  • tobie on Late Night Open Thread: Buyer’s Remorse (Jul 14, 2025 @ 1:17am)
  • Chetan Murthy on Late Night Open Thread: Buyer’s Remorse (Jul 14, 2025 @ 1:13am)

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
No Kings Protests June 14 2025

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)
Fix Nyms with Apostrophes

Social Media

Balloon Juice
WaterGirl
TaMara
John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
David Anderson
Major Major Major Major
DougJ NYT Pitchbot
mistermix

Keeping Track

Legal Challenges (Lawfare)
Republicans Fleeing Town Halls (TPM)
21 Letters (to Borrow or Steal)
Search Donations from a Brand

Feeling Defeated?  If We Give Up, It's Game Over

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2025 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!