• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

“Jesus paying for the sins of everyone is an insult to those who paid for their own sins.”

This chaos was totally avoidable.

He really is that stupid.

No offense, but this thread hasn’t been about you for quite a while.

These days, even the boring Republicans are nuts.

The press swings at every pitch, we don’t have to.

Of course you can have champagne before noon. That’s why orange juice was invented.

🎶 Those boots were made for mockin’ 🎵

How stupid are these people?

It is not hopeless, and we are not helpless.

Human rights are not a matter of opinion!

She burned that motherfucker down, and I am so here for it. Thank you, Caroline Kennedy.

Humiliatingly small and eclipsed by the derision of millions.

Conservatism: there are people the law protects but does not bind and others who the law binds but does not protect.

The snowflake in chief appeared visibly frustrated when questioned by a reporter about egg prices.

SCOTUS: It’s not “bribery” unless it comes from the Bribery region of France. Otherwise, it’s merely “sparkling malfeasance”.

When they say they are pro-life, they do not mean yours.

No Kings: Americans standing in the way of bad history saying “Oh, Fuck No!”

New McCarthy, same old McCarthyism.

We can show the world that autocracy can be defeated.

Petty moves from a petty man.

When you’re a Republican, they let you do it.

This year has been the longest three days of putin’s life.

I’m starting to think Jesus may have made a mistake saving people with no questions asked.

Mobile Menu

  • Seattle Meet-up Post
  • 2025 Activism
  • Targeted Political Fundraising
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • COVID-19
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • 2025 Activism
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • Targeted Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Politics / Impeachment / Impeach the Motherfucker! / Sondland’s a No Show

Sondland’s a No Show

by @heymistermix.com|  October 8, 20198:57 am| 101 Comments

This post is in: Impeach the Motherfucker!

FacebookTweetEmail

The State Department has directed Gordon Sondland, Ambassador to the EU and enthusiastic user of WhatsApp, not to testify.

Sondland can’t testify because he’s still an employee. If I were him – that is, if I were a person caught red-handed as a lower-echelon conspirator – I would just quit and testify, and then go cooperate with any of the inevitable criminal investigations in hopes that I wouldn’t be wearing a jumpsuit in a minimum security prison. But, apparently, Sondland wants to go down with the ship.

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « On The Road: On Hiatus
Next Post: New Jersey and the policy counterfactual for outreach »

Reader Interactions

101Comments

  1. 1.

    Dorothy A. Winsor

    October 8, 2019 at 9:03 am

    If Sondland contributed $1M to Trump’s campaign, he can afford to quit and go back to whatever he was doing before. I’d like to see Congress hold him in contempt. Someone needs to be exhibit #1 for what happens to you if you defy a Congressional subpoena.

  2. 2.

    No One of Consequence

    October 8, 2019 at 9:06 am

    Great googly moogly.

    The gob, it is so sore from overabuse what with all the smacking lately.

    I recognize my country less and less. And I hope and suspect it is not Alzheimer’s.

    Peace and Justice,

    – NOoC

  3. 3.

    Aleta

    October 8, 2019 at 9:12 am

    He is “profoundly disappointed” after traveling from Brussels, lawyer says, and still wants to testify.

    poor thing

  4. 4.

    Spanky

    October 8, 2019 at 9:14 am

    @Aleta: I thought that that looked like taunting, which is an additional 15 yard penalty tacked on to the end of whatever sentence he winds up with.

  5. 5.

    Matt McIrvin

    October 8, 2019 at 9:15 am

    The fact that the administration is ordering people not to testify, presumably under orders or at least approval from Trump, is an impeachable offense in itself. We really don’t need anything else.

  6. 6.

    Betty Cracker

    October 8, 2019 at 9:15 am

    Does anyone know if former Ambassador Marie Yovanovitch is still a State Dept. employee?

  7. 7.

    Quinerly

    October 8, 2019 at 9:16 am

    @Betty Cracker: MSNBC just said she is still an employee of the State Department

  8. 8.

    Betty Cracker

    October 8, 2019 at 9:18 am

    @Matt McIrvin: True in a technical sense, but from a public opinion standpoint, we need to expose as much of this corrupt crew’s malfeasance as we can so we can hang it around Republicans’ necks when they take a vote to let the criminals get away with it.

    @Quinerly: Thank you! I wonder if she’ll be willing to quit and testify or defy orders as an employee and testify…

  9. 9.

    Cervantes

    October 8, 2019 at 9:18 am

    You seem to forget the presidential pardon power. Also too, I don’t expect William Barr will prosecute.

  10. 10.

    oldster

    October 8, 2019 at 9:19 am

    Jail him. Find him in contempt, and then put him in jail until he testifies.

    Congress has the power, unless it gives it away. Use it or lose it. And start with a low-level, unsympathetic schmuck like Sondland.

    Then work upwards.

  11. 11.

    Barbara

    October 8, 2019 at 9:19 am

    It used to be that if an employee refused to testify in front of Congress said employee could not remain employed by the USG. If you remember, Monica Goodling resigned rather than testify.

  12. 12.

    JPL

    October 8, 2019 at 9:26 am

    Speculation is that republicans can stomach obstruction, but maybe not his testimony. Republicans are beginning to slowly move towards impeachment. Additional defectors would not be welcome.

  13. 13.

    MattF

    October 8, 2019 at 9:27 am

    Let’s see… we have 1) Obstruction of justice, and 2) Abuse of power. There needs to be a third, if only for stylistic reasons. And no, it can’t be ‘Assholery’.

    ETA: ‘Treason’?

  14. 14.

    Jinchi

    October 8, 2019 at 9:28 am

    Sondland can’t testify because he’s still an employee.

    Does Pompeo, who is directly implicated in these crimes, really have the authority to prevent an employee from responding to a Congressional subpoena during an impeachment investigation?

  15. 15.

    Rommie

    October 8, 2019 at 9:29 am

    @MattF: How about aiding our enemies, Foreign and Domestic?

  16. 16.

    Gin & Tonic

    October 8, 2019 at 9:29 am

    Marie Yovanovitch is 60 years old and a career Foreign Service Officer. I’m sure she has thought long and hard about her personal financial situation, her pension, etc. Suggesting someone in that position resign on principle and defy SecState and POTUS is a hell of a stretch.

  17. 17.

    Dorothy A. Winsor

    October 8, 2019 at 9:32 am

    @Gin & Tonic: Compared to Sondland especially. That’s why he should be the one to go to jail.

  18. 18.

    Kay

    October 8, 2019 at 9:33 am

    Absolute contempt for the public, Team Trump. The rules don’t apply to the special people.

    Remember when the lying she-devil testified for 11 hours? And the media continued to portray her as presumptively a criminal and obstructing?

    They never had SHIT in Benghazi- everyone’s aware of that, right? They promised to find something! They promoted it for 2 years! But they never had anything at all.

  19. 19.

    rikyrah

    October 8, 2019 at 9:37 am

    When I found out about WhatsApp,……

    I could do nothing but LOL

  20. 20.

    Kay

    October 8, 2019 at 9:37 am

    Today in courtrooms and proceedings all over the country thousands of people will testify. Many of them don’t want to!

    But the most powerful people? They’re excused. They claim special status and refuse to speak on the record and under oath to the people who pay them.

    What if everyone did this? What if everyone in the country behaved like Donald Trump and his employees?

  21. 21.

    Kay

    October 8, 2019 at 9:42 am

    @rikyrah:

    It is AMAZING how our grave national concern for secure communications has just..poof! Disappeared!

    The President’s sleazy lawyer(s) and the other assorted low quality hires are privy to our entire foreign policy and national security issues in numerous countries and the public has no clue what they do when they’re working on his behalf. Congress doesn’t know either. Half of Congress doesn’t want to know and are working as hard as they can not to find out.

  22. 22.

    Soprano2

    October 8, 2019 at 9:43 am

    Congress needs to start having people arrested. That would make some of them think twice before refusing to testify. From what I’ve read there are no actual grounds for this refusal other than the State Department saying no.

    Kay, of course if everyone behaved this way it wouldn’t be tolerated. Wealthy, powerful people always get a pass. That’s one reason they’re so terrified of Elizabeth Warren – she refuses to believe they deserve that.

  23. 23.

    Aleta

    October 8, 2019 at 9:43 am

    @Spanky: ha (He’ll never score now!)

  24. 24.

    Le Comte de Monte Cristo, fka Edmund Dantes

    October 8, 2019 at 9:44 am

    My blood pressure just shot sky high – I just saw the three stooges (Meadows, Gaetz, Jordan) on TV, Meadows with that filthy North Carolina drawl. It took everything I could do to not drive my fist through the TV.

    I hate these people.

  25. 25.

    Betty Cracker

    October 8, 2019 at 9:46 am

    @Gin & Tonic: Sometimes doing the right thing is hard. I can’t say I’d have the courage to put the country’s interests above my own if I were in her situation since I’ve never been tested in that way, but I hope I would.

  26. 26.

    rikyrah

    October 8, 2019 at 9:50 am

    @Kay:

    I don’t even use it. But, it’s the thought of doing BUSINESS OF THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT..

    over a damn APP?

  27. 27.

    Kay

    October 8, 2019 at 9:50 am

    @Soprano2:

    Trump himself says there’s nothing wrong with what he did. So why won’t the underlings testify? We footed the bill for this entire political operation they’ve been running. I’d like to know what I paid for. I laughed out loud when it came out they were also running a sleazy deal on individual “business opportunities”. Of course they were. It’s always, always about individual self interest. It’s the icing on the corruption cake. They don’t just run Dear Leaders scams on our dime, they also always have a personal angle.

  28. 28.

    JPL

    October 8, 2019 at 9:50 am

    @Betty Cracker: Magic eight ball says NO.

  29. 29.

    Bruce K

    October 8, 2019 at 10:03 am

    Lincoln supposedly said once, “Nearly all men can stand adversity, but if you want to test a man’s character, give him power.”

    Well, we’ve given them power, and we’ve seen what they’ve done with it.

    The problem is going to be taking away that power, and making sure that they never have access to it again.

  30. 30.

    oldgold

    October 8, 2019 at 10:05 am

    I cannot believe they did not subpoena Sondland. What were they thinking?

    When engaged in matters such as this you need to size up your opponent and play the game accordingly.

  31. 31.

    catclub

    October 8, 2019 at 10:07 am

    @Kay:

    But the most powerful people? They’re excused.

    Most people are bound by the law but not protected by it.
    Others are protected by the law, but not bound by it. Double for Trump. When he applies for an emergency stay of some order, he always gets it.
    When he ignores court orders, nothing happens.

  32. 32.

    Aleta

    October 8, 2019 at 10:07 am

    Jim Sciutto @jimsciutto

    Sondland has texts and emails on a personal device which State Dept is withholding from Congress – @RepAdamSchiff just now.

  33. 33.

    Ian R

    October 8, 2019 at 10:09 am

    @rikyrah: It’s amazing the places that app has crept in. I remember back when the various Members of Parliament broke off to form what became change.uk, one of the things that kept being mentioned was them leaving the various Tory WhatsApp groups.

  34. 34.

    moops

    October 8, 2019 at 10:09 am

    Norms don’t apply anymore, and none of these people are going to show up to testify. Standard GOP practice during all bad scandals. Just don’t show up, and don’t cooperate with investigations and obstruct justice as much as they like, and there are never any consequences. Things will not improve until someone does hard prison time for violating summons and obstructing justice. It has been true since the Cheney administration.

  35. 35.

    RepubAnon

    October 8, 2019 at 10:10 am

    @Cervantes: That’s it. These folks are caught between Congress and the DOJ. Whichever one they cooperate with, the other one will attack. The Congressional committees should stop seeking voluntary cooperation and go straight to subpoenas.

  36. 36.

    Patricia Kayden

    October 8, 2019 at 10:11 am

    And Trump has invited Erdogan for an official state visit while Erdogan is in the midst of murdering Kurds. How nice and normal.

  37. 37.

    Chyron HR

    October 8, 2019 at 10:12 am

    @Gin & Tonic:

    Speaking as a member of a demographic that earned the POTUS’s wrath by simply existing, boo hoo.

  38. 38.

    rp

    October 8, 2019 at 10:12 am

    @oldgold: Why would they subpoena him when he agreed to appear voluntarily? It’s not as if they’ve given up the right to subpoena him.

  39. 39.

    Patricia Kayden

    October 8, 2019 at 10:13 am

    @moops: Imagine what would have happened if Secretary Clinton hadn’t shown up to be grilled for 11 hours by House Republicans. Or if Attorney General Holder hadn’t turned up when he was called to testify at the Fast and Furious hearing.

    But IOKIYAR.

  40. 40.

    Aleta

    October 8, 2019 at 10:18 am

    Sierra Hull, Weighted Mind

  41. 41.

    A Good Woman

    October 8, 2019 at 10:19 am

    @Gin & Tonic: It hinges on whether she came in under the Civil Service Retirement System (CSRS) or the replacement Federal Employee Retirement System (FERS). The latter incorporates Social Security and retirement follows those rules. CSRS employees can retire at age 55 w/30 years of service. She would certainly qualify to retire under that program, assuming she was covered by it.

  42. 42.

    germy

    October 8, 2019 at 10:23 am

    During the 2016 United States presidential election, Sondland initially supported Donald Trump, but cancelled a fundraiser and repudiated Trump for his attacks on Khizr and Ghazala Khan. In April 2017, it was revealed that 4 companies registered to Sondland donated $1 million to the Donald Trump inaugural committee.

    (wikipedia)

  43. 43.

    Raoul

    October 8, 2019 at 10:25 am

    Sonland paid one million dollars for his ticket. Hell yes, he’s going to stay on SS Trump.

  44. 44.

    Kent

    October 8, 2019 at 10:26 am

    We know from the Clinton fiasco that only non-classified material gets handled on non-secure methods like WhatsApp. So therefore, nothing these criminals said on WhatsApp should be classifed and we should all be able to see it.

    Right? Right?

  45. 45.

    Kelly

    October 8, 2019 at 10:26 am

    @MattF:

    And no, it can’t be ‘Assholery’.

    Articles 10 and 11 of the Andrew Johnson impeachment were kinda for assholery.

  46. 46.

    germy

    October 8, 2019 at 10:28 am

    This system of rewarding donors with political positions is pretty rotten.

  47. 47.

    Aleta

    October 8, 2019 at 10:29 am

    Sierra Hull, The In-Between

  48. 48.

    Raoul

    October 8, 2019 at 10:29 am

    @Kay: Right. Trump’s position this morning (as he openly admits that he is obstructing Sonland’s testimony): I’d be totally exonerated, but for Schiff being a meanie.

  49. 49.

    scav

    October 8, 2019 at 10:31 am

    He really is running the country like a business. There’s more here (Trump firm ‘refusing to pay’ legal bill for windfarm case) but here’s a topical quote

    He took his battle to the Scottish parliament, claiming the country’s heavy investment in onshore windfarms would ruin its tourism industry. In one famous exchange with MSPs, Trump insisted the committee did not need to call any witnesses to verify his claims.
    “I am the evidence,” he said. “I’m an expert in tourism. I have won many, many awards … if you dot your landscape with these horrible, horrible structures, you will do tremendous damage.”

    ssshhhhh. I fear our political landscape is dotted with these horrible horrible red-hatted structures.

  50. 50.

    oldgold

    October 8, 2019 at 10:34 am

    @rp:

    Yes, I would. And, have done so when dealing with skunks. Then, you use the belts and suspenders approach.

    You lose what i criticized Mueller for repeatedly: timing and time.

  51. 51.

    chopper

    October 8, 2019 at 10:35 am

    @Matt McIrvin:

    how is this not obstruction?

  52. 52.

    Belafon

    October 8, 2019 at 10:36 am

    @RepubAnon: The Congressional committees are submitting subpoenas. They’re challenging those in court.

  53. 53.

    Mike in DC

    October 8, 2019 at 10:36 am

    Pelosi should do the following:
    1. Announce that the House will be holding 2 votes: the first on opening a formal impeachment inquiry, the second to “pre-authorize” committee heads investigating matters related to impeachment to hold witnesses in inherent contempt of Congress and arrest them on the spot.
    2. Make this announcement while accompanied by the Sergeant at Arms of the Senate and a squad of Capitol Police.
    3. Announce that, in light of US v Nixon, the House will NOT recognize any subsequent claims of executive privilege(or any other objections) and will expect full compliance. Any noncompliance will be further evidence of obstruction of justice, itself an impeachable offense.

    Part of public support for impeachment rising is the House showing actual strength and a spine for one. Pelosi should lean into that.

  54. 54.

    chopper

    October 8, 2019 at 10:37 am

    @Aleta:

    PERSONAL EMAILS??!

  55. 55.

    West of the Rockies

    October 8, 2019 at 10:44 am

    Well, in response I suspect we may soon the gentle hiss of air (and damning information) leaking from the IC apparatus.

  56. 56.

    Kay

    October 8, 2019 at 10:50 am

    @Raoul:

    Right. Trump’s position this morning (as he openly admits that he is obstructing Sonland’s testimony): I’d be totally exonerated, but for Schiff being a meanie.

    Ordinary people don’t get to pick the prosecutor. It’s entitlement, pure and simple. They’re special so their hurt feelings matter.

    I read that Guiliani hates Biden for “a noun and a verb and 9/11”. That was a good line and it’s 100% true- no wonder it stung.

    The people in the highest levels of government are spoiled, entitled 7th graders. Petty, wholly self absorbed and childish. I blame their parents. Poorly raised.

  57. 57.

    rikyrah

    October 8, 2019 at 10:52 am

    ??????

    Spent a day marinating in black excellence with these gorgeous, promising, young men at @Morehouse. They honored me with roses, a song, and a portrait for a scholarship fund I set up 30 years ago. Can’t wait to see what they do with their future. pic.twitter.com/o28hWkdC7w

    — Oprah Winfrey (@Oprah) October 8, 2019

  58. 58.

    rikyrah

    October 8, 2019 at 10:53 am

    Wakandan War Dog (@Kennymack1971) Tweeted:
    In the end let the record show White America’s collective arrogance, stupidity, hard headedness and unwavering belief in the myth of white supremacy above all did more to tank the United States than the “Others” they worked so hard to hold back.

    Assholes.

    Wakandan War Dog (@Kennymack1971) Tweeted:
    That’s why while it may be unfair to some of you these “I regret my vote” folks can go fuck themselves as far as I’m concerned. You could’ve done the right thing in 2016 but you chose the orange racist.

    Fuck your regrets.

    Wakandan War Dog (@Kennymack1971) Tweeted:
    I’ve said it before and I will keep saying it…I will never let go of the fact that a majority of white voters decided to put a janky ass D celebrity in the WH. And now they have the gall to be stunned at the results.

    This really happened. They can’t tell me shit.

    Ever again. https://twitter.com/Kennymack1971/status/1181401359435943936?s=17

  59. 59.

    Another Scott

    October 8, 2019 at 10:53 am

    Twitter:

    4:30 PM – THE PRESIDENT presents the Presidential Medal of Freedom to Edwin Meese

    1984 was not intended to be an instruction manual!!11

    Grrr…

    Cheers,
    Scott.

  60. 60.

    Snarki, child of Loki

    October 8, 2019 at 10:55 am

    “hold witnesses in inherent contempt of Congress and arrest them on the spot.”

    hold them in the House basement and waterboard them until they talk also, too.

  61. 61.

    Cheryl from Maryland

    October 8, 2019 at 10:56 am

    @Gin & Tonic: Your experience may be different from mine, but my friends in the Foreign Service were either up or out at age 60. No one I know had calculated that their pension or finances would improve by staying on longer, even if they had a position in which to stay longer. However, none of my friends had reached the Ambassador level. I’m shocked she is still an employee and actually has a position — albeit a university fellowship.

  62. 62.

    Kay

    October 8, 2019 at 11:00 am

    Carl Quintanilla
    @carlquintanilla
    · 1h
    * U.S. HOUSE INTELLIGENCE PANEL CHAIRMAN SCHIFF SAYS STATE DEPARTMENT IS WITHHOLDING TEXT MESSAGES FROM U.S. AMBASSADOR TO THE EU ON PERSONAL DEVICE RELEVANT TO IMPEACHMENT INQUIRY

    And, there it is. But you knew it. Everyone knows it. Incredibly, now that they successfully smeared Clinton all the phony national security hawks no longer care about this. Phonies and frauds, the lot of ’em.

  63. 63.

    Immanentize

    October 8, 2019 at 11:01 am

    @Gin & Tonic: @Cheryl from Maryland:
    Has anyone considered that Yovanovitch might also be at least knee deep in corrupt shit and therefore the current State Dept. Is the best place for her?

    There are no White Wizards in this episode.

  64. 64.

    JR

    October 8, 2019 at 11:02 am

    The dude bought into his position. This was as predictable as it gets.

  65. 65.

    cain

    October 8, 2019 at 11:05 am

    @Cervantes:
    Interesting if the president can pardon someone who defies congress to testify something against the President. That seems like a SCOTUS thing.

  66. 66.

    japa21

    October 8, 2019 at 11:06 am

    @Immanentize: Highly unlikely.

  67. 67.

    Kay

    October 8, 2019 at 11:09 am

    @JRubinBlogger
    ·1h
    The president’s foreign policy is a fiasco because he is so easily rolled. “Donald Trump got ‘rolled’ by Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan, a National Security Council source with direct knowledge of the discussions told Newsweek.”

    Of course he did. He always does. He’s a terrible negotiator. The funniest part about the Ukraine thing is how he blurted out what he wants and made it clear he was willing to trade anything, anything to get it. He somehow managed to start with a desperate Ukraine on the other side of the table and then he handed them all the leverage by showing just how much he needed fake dirt on Biden in order to win. The Ukranian leader is also inexperienced, but they aren’t all that desperate and they will, ARE, taking advantage of him, because he’s a moron.

  68. 68.

    psycholinguist

    October 8, 2019 at 11:09 am

    I’d think Yovanovitch could call the bluff pretty easily. She testifies, and what – they fire her? That would create a shitstorm much larger than the one they have now for prohibiting witnesses. I’d hope she’d understand she has the power in this situation, but I’d guess these people have risk-averse lawyers telling them something else.

  69. 69.

    cain

    October 8, 2019 at 11:10 am

    The next time the budget needs to be passed, I guess, they’ll need to be forced to show up. No DOJ without no money, motherfucker. We might as use every tool. Nancy passed a budget up to this year. After that, just threaten to not pass a budget until those assholes show up in court. That is the one power those fuckers can’t force. Of course, knowing Trump, he’ll just start spending money regardless ignoring the House.

  70. 70.

    Kay

    October 8, 2019 at 11:14 am

    The thing is if you’re a good negotiator you don’t find yourself in this massive mess of your own making.

    Trump’s ace negotiation skills are so bad they are going to get him impeached. Donald Trump ran this clown show. It’s his from start to finish, and look where he is- paying whole teams of sleazy lawyers to cover his ass and obstruct. That’s not an…ideal result. He fucks up once a month and then spends the next six months weaseling out of it. That’s not (actually) a good performance. You don’t get credit for making your own problems and then blunderingly attempting to fix them.

  71. 71.

    Kay

    October 8, 2019 at 11:16 am

    Guiliani is another one. He’s such a good lawyer he’s gotten his client impeached. His client is in worse shape than he is, as a result of his “expert” counsel. Good job, low quality hires! Maybe next you can put him in prison.

  72. 72.

    ET

    October 8, 2019 at 11:17 am

    Top level at State and all of the WH have to be shredding documents right and left because whenever there is a new administration – pray for the sooner rather than the later – it all comes out anyway. And in any case, just because the political hacks like Pompeo and Sondland won’t testify doesn’t mean that at some point non-political appointees won’t start talking (particularly when Pompeo and tRump are gone and not around to threaten)./ I know this is a tRump & Co tactic – delay, delay, delay – but they won’t be able to control the narrative forever. When the threat of that power is gone and they don’t have the power behind them they don’t have any say.

  73. 73.

    M31

    October 8, 2019 at 11:21 am

    @MattF:

    Let’s see… we have 1) Obstruction of justice, and 2) Abuse of power. There needs to be a third, if only for stylistic reasons.

    3) Oops

  74. 74.

    Gin & Tonic

    October 8, 2019 at 11:23 am

    @Immanentize: Do you have evidence to smear her with, counselor?

  75. 75.

    Jamie

    October 8, 2019 at 11:25 am

    @West of the Rockies:

    That’s my guess. It’s messed up that we’ve come to expect/rely on this, but I really don’t see the IC sitting idly by and twiddling their thumbs while the administration fucks them over again and again and again.

  76. 76.

    Immanentize

    October 8, 2019 at 11:29 am

    @japa21:
    Why?

  77. 77.

    wvblueguy

    October 8, 2019 at 11:32 am

    @Mike in DC
    You make more sense than virtually everybody including the Democrats in Congress. Showing disdain for the constitutional powers of Congress as Trump and his cronies have done is something that needs to be shouted from the rooftops. Your ideas will get this done. I’m tired of seeing Democrats being looked at as wimps. Issue Sondland a subpoena and put him in jail if he doesn’t testify. It is also time to take the case to the courts. If the Trump Supreme Court doesn’t support the right of Congressional oversight then we are looking at a future full of corruption and malfeasance. Going to the Courts also will give the impression that something is being done.

  78. 78.

    cain

    October 8, 2019 at 11:32 am

    Out of curiosity, can the DOJ intimidate House members with bullshit investigations? Seems like he can direct all kinds of things, spy on them and not only use it against House members, but also share it with Russians.

  79. 79.

    Mike in Pasadena

    October 8, 2019 at 11:35 am

    @Kay: The differnce must be emails vs texts. /s

  80. 80.

    Another Scott

    October 8, 2019 at 11:37 am

    @Jinchi: Lawyers can argue about anything. It’s what they’re trained and paid to do.

    Executive agencies commonly have “public affairs” officers, and people whose job it is to interact with Congress. It’s unusual for an underling to testify before Congress. But, obviously, a congressional subpoena should be respected in almost all circumstances, no matter who is called.

    Cheers,
    Scott.

  81. 81.

    Humdog

    October 8, 2019 at 11:38 am

    Yovanovitch Got the boot because she wouldn’t go along with Rudy Colludy and his extortion game. Why would anyone think she is dirty?

    I still think the EU should expel our ambassador. He helped endanger a nation petitioning for EU membership. I would think they would have zero tolerance of such a thing.

  82. 82.

    Immanentize

    October 8, 2019 at 11:41 am

    @Gin & Tonic:
    Who is smearing anyone? She remained in a political appointment in this administration in a place where everyone knew Trump and his cronies had on the ground interests. Before she was appointed, we knew the Trump/Republican plan was to give as much of Ukraine to the Russians as possible. And she was certainly informed about the Manafort investigation. You think she has been a resistance mole for three years working for Clinton or the Deep State?

    At best, she was acting professionally in extremely difficult situations. But she was also carrying Trump’s water because she was a member of his State Department when most other hold over ambassadors were removed or quit. Especially in sensitive postings. Hell, even Huntsman quit.

    I neither smear her nor clear her. As people have pointed out, time will tell. But to think that she is the James Dean of this scandal is my hope, but I dare not trust that hope. Facts counsel otherwise.

  83. 83.

    Kent

    October 8, 2019 at 11:42 am

    @Cheryl from Maryland:

    @Gin & Tonic: Your experience may be different from mine, but my friends in the Foreign Service were either up or out at age 60. No one I know had calculated that their pension or finances would improve by staying on longer, even if they had a position in which to stay longer. However, none of my friends had reached the Ambassador level. I’m shocked she is still an employee and actually has a position — albeit a university fellowship.

    Well, technically speaking the pension does improve with more years served. It’s a mathematical formula. But the difference is like 2-3% per year. There isn’t a threashold in Federal pensions like in some police/fire pensions. I worked for 10 years and get a pension that is half what it would be if I had worked 20 years, etc.

    Someone at the ambasador level would most likely be looking for some think tank or NGO type job to plug the gap between leaving Federal service and starting full time retirement. There are a bazillion international NGOs out there who would probably be interested in hiring former ambasadors. It is a big revolving door. So she would have options. Being fired by Trump for having integrity is probably a plus career-wise at this point.

  84. 84.

    Kent

    October 8, 2019 at 11:47 am

    @cain:

    Out of curiosity, can the DOJ intimidate House members with bullshit investigations? Seems like he can direct all kinds of things, spy on them and not only use it against House members, but also share it with Russians.

    No, there is separation of powers. I mean technically they can open actual criminal investigations for actual crimes like bribery. Remember Abscam and the Louisiana Dem who got caught with dirty cash frozen in his freezer? But the DOJ can’t investigate House members for anything related to their actual jobs.

    Nixon tried to get the IRS to audit his enemies in Congress. That didn’t work so well for him.

  85. 85.

    The Moar You Know

    October 8, 2019 at 11:56 am

    I’d hope she’d understand she has the power in this situation, but I’d guess these people have risk-averse lawyers telling them something else.

    @psycholinguist: I’m sure you’re just as qualified to make that assessment as someone with a law license.

  86. 86.

    J R in WV

    October 8, 2019 at 11:56 am

    @Mike in DC:

    I agree strongly with this list of steps that should be taken; arresting those refusing to testify, especially. Take them out of their homes at 6 am if necessary, do a large bunch the first time, everyone who hasn’t done the right thing so far at the time of the bust. Put them into a DC city jail with the standard people you find in the DC jail, general population.

  87. 87.

    catclub

    October 8, 2019 at 11:59 am

    @Kent: pension at 60 with 20 years service is 20% of high three-yrs salary
    pension at 62 with 22 years service is 24.2% of high three salary. So that later pension is more than 20% higher than the lower pension.

    Not a cliff, but 62 is notably better than 60 for retirement.

  88. 88.

    japa21

    October 8, 2019 at 12:02 pm

    @Immanentize: She has been in the foreign service for over 30 years. She was appointed to Ukraine by Obama. To resign that position would have been to end her career. She was on the front lines fighting corruption in Ukraine but was recalled because she wouldn’t cooperate in Trump’s blackmail scheme. Which, in and of itself, is evidence this had nothing to do with Trump’s concern with corruption as that was a major concern of hers.
    I see absolutely no reason whatsoever to think she in any way would be “knee-deep” in this mess.

    ETA: You brought up Huntsman who didn’t need his position. I doubt she is independently wealthy.

  89. 89.

    Gin & Tonic

    October 8, 2019 at 12:02 pm

    @Immanentize: Are you suggesting that no conscientious Foreign Service Officer should have taken that posting? Leaving Ukraine either with no Ambassador or with some political hack would have been better? Should the current chargé d’affaires, William Taylor, also be implicated as crooked because he took on that posting? I’m not clear on your argument.

  90. 90.

    J R in WV

    October 8, 2019 at 12:06 pm

    @cain:

    Interesting if the president can pardon someone who defies congress to testify something against the President. That seems like a SCOTUS thing.

    Actually, one of the few limits of the pardon power is in cases of impeachment. They saw that unlimited pardon power would make impeachment a dead letter on day one. Not that the Supremes might not want to attempt to undo that black letter Constitutional limitation.

    Personally, I believe Supreme Court Justices who go along with Trump’s obstruction of justice should be Impeached, have their federal pensions stricken, etc, etc.

  91. 91.

    Kent

    October 8, 2019 at 12:13 pm

    @catclub: I guess the State Dept is different from other civilian agencies. I worked for NOAA and there was no such break point. After 20 years of service the multiplier goes from 1% to 1.1% under FERS which is not nothing I guess. But not the 20% you cite.

  92. 92.

    big mango

    October 8, 2019 at 12:19 pm

    @moops: since the Reagan admin….since the Nixon admin….since the ….admin….

  93. 93.

    Ksmiami

    October 8, 2019 at 12:25 pm

    @Le Comte de Monte Cristo, fka Edmund Dantes: if I ever see them in person…

  94. 94.

    Ksmiami

    October 8, 2019 at 12:29 pm

    @Chyron HR: I no longer believe peaceful coexistence is possible nor desired. The Republican Party is an enemy of modern Democracy

  95. 95.

    catclub

    October 8, 2019 at 12:42 pm

    @Kent: That is all I am citing. 1.1 is 10% better than 1%, but with the additional two years, another 10%,
    then multiply.

    it is 1.1 x22xhighthree = 24.2 * highthree
    versus 1.0*20* highthree= 20 * highthree

    no: the FERS multiplier goes to 1.1 at age 62, with 20+
    years. At age 60 I am pretty sure the multiplier is only 1.0

  96. 96.

    catclub

    October 8, 2019 at 12:47 pm

    From FERS:

    FERS Basic Annuity Formula Age Formula

    Under Age 62 at Separation for Retirement, OR
    Age 62 or Older With Less Than 20 Years of Service 1 percent of your high-3 average salary for each year of service

    Age 62 or Older at Separation With 20 or More Years of Service 1.1 percent of your high-3 average salary for each year of service

    I was comparing age 60, with 20 years, and age 62 with 22 years.

  97. 97.

    Kent

    October 8, 2019 at 12:55 pm

    @catclub: OK, we are on the same page. It’s here: https://www.opm.gov/retirement-services/fers-information/computation/

    Point is, walking away now is not the same thing as retirement. It is simply resigning. She could easily come back in 2 years and take another job with the next administration. People do come and go from government all the time. Of course if she is a GOP hack then that would be unlikely.

    Also still, the FERS pension is really just a 1/2 pension compared to normal pensions. No one lives on a FERS pension. They also draw social security and with 20+ years of service should also have a very tidy TSP account balance (Federal 401k). So a 20% hit to her FERS pension is really only like a 5% hit to her actual retirement income. Not like the old days when pension was all you had.

    In any event, I think there is a separate retirement system for the state department foreign service that is different from regular civilian FERS. I think state department employees who work in DC get the normal FERS but foreign service officers serving overseas have something more like the military pension.

  98. 98.

    Zelma

    October 8, 2019 at 12:58 pm

    Isn’t Sondland a hotelier? Doesn’t he have a lot of hotels in the Pacific Northwest, like Portland and Seattle? Wouldn’t it be interesting if there were demonstrations at his hotels reminding his patrons that he is defying the United States Congress? And that he is apparently corrupt? Aren’t there lots of Democrats in Portland and Seattle? Hit the guy where it hurts.

  99. 99.

    Kent

    October 8, 2019 at 1:04 pm

    @Zelma: Yes he is. He owns a bunch of the very fanciest “boutique” hotels in downtown Portland like this one: https://heathmanhotel.com/

    I live here in the Portland area and this guy is actually sort of the anti-Trump in terms of profile. He has always been pretty under the radar compared to some other Portland business types who are more splashy like Trump and have their names everywhere. I don’t think a lot of people really knew of him until this stuff broke. He doesn’t strike me as the type who wants his “brand” sullied by politics, especially in the PNW.

  100. 100.

    Terry chay

    October 8, 2019 at 1:33 pm

    Sondland makes sense since I am willing to bet that this was an pre-agreed-upon delaying tactic.

    What Yovonavoch does will be based on what her lawyer advises, not some political calculus or percent in her pension.

  101. 101.

    Bonnie

    October 8, 2019 at 4:46 pm

    The fact that he is still a Federal Government employee is all the more reason why he should testify. If he doesn’t, he should be fired. I know that is what would have happened to me when I worked for the government for 37 years. Sondland is breaking a law by not testifying. Fire his you-know-what!

Comments are closed.

Primary Sidebar

On The Road - Albatrossity - The Birds of May 3
Image by Albatrossity (7/31/25)

World Central Kitchen

Donate

Recent Comments

  • trollhattan on The Ongoing Texas Tragedies (Jul 12, 2025 @ 12:20pm)
  • Miss Bianca on Saturday Morning Klown Show Open Thread: GOP Falling Into the Pit They Have Dug (Jul 12, 2025 @ 12:19pm)
  • Ruckus on Saturday Morning Klown Show Open Thread: GOP Falling Into the Pit They Have Dug (Jul 12, 2025 @ 12:14pm)
  • eclare on The Ongoing Texas Tragedies (Jul 12, 2025 @ 12:13pm)
  • Another Scott on The Ongoing Texas Tragedies (Jul 12, 2025 @ 12:13pm)

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
No Kings Protests June 14 2025

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)
Fix Nyms with Apostrophes

Social Media

Balloon Juice
WaterGirl
TaMara
John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
David Anderson
Major Major Major Major
DougJ NYT Pitchbot
mistermix

Keeping Track

Legal Challenges (Lawfare)
Republicans Fleeing Town Halls (TPM)
21 Letters (to Borrow or Steal)
Search Donations from a Brand

Feeling Defeated?  If We Give Up, It's Game Over

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2025 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!