• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

If you tweet it in all caps, that makes it true!

Optimism opens the door to great things.

The next time the wall street journal editorial board speaks the truth will be the first.

We are aware of all internet traditions.

Fuck the extremist election deniers. What’s money for if not for keeping them out of office?

Take hopelessness and turn it into resilience.

I’ve spoken to my cat about this, but it doesn’t seem to do any good.

I was promised a recession.

Seems like a complicated subject, have you tried yelling at it?

So it was an October Surprise A Day, like an Advent calendar but for crime.

… riddled with inexplicable and elementary errors of law and fact

Their freedom requires your slavery.

Within six months Twitter will be fully self-driving.

“Everybody’s entitled to be an idiot.”

Let me eat cake. The rest of you could stand to lose some weight, frankly.

Good lord, these people are nuts.

Technically true, but collectively nonsense

White supremacy is terrorism.

Usually wrong but never in doubt

The worst democrat is better than the best republican.

Prediction: the GOP will rethink its strategy of boycotting future committees.

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

Not so fun when the rabbit gets the gun, is it?

Never entrust democracy to any process that requires republicans to act in good faith.

Mobile Menu

  • Winnable House Races
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • Balloon Juice 2023 Pet Calendar (coming soon)
  • COVID-19 Coronavirus
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • War in Ukraine
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • 2021-22 Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Anderson On Health Insurance / Financial engineering at CSR cut points

Financial engineering at CSR cut points

by David Anderson|  November 27, 20199:56 am| 8 Comments

This post is in: Anderson On Health Insurance

FacebookTweetEmail

I was recently speaking with Juicer who is shopping for an ACA plan.  They are Cost Sharing Reduction (CSR) eligible and their projected income for 2020 is literally a point or two above a major CSR cut-off point where the benefit value changes dramatically.  CSR benefits for people who are not American Indian/Alaskan Natives come in three bands.

Start Income (FPL) End Income (FPL) Silver Actuarial Value
            100%                  149% 94
  150%      199%      87
    200%      250%      73
            250%          infinite 70

 

I converted those actuarial values into a real world example of how one Silver plan spreads out its cost sharing variants.  Data is from the 2020 Landscape Public Use File:

 

Deductible and Out of Pocket Maxes at FPL for Silver CSR Plans

 

We see significant discontinuities as income passes the CSR thresholds.  CSR 94 has a $100 deductible while CSR 87 has a $500 deductible.  The out of pocket maxes have bigger jumps.

Researchers have found that people have engineered their income to qualify for subsidies at 100% FPL and 399% FPL.

 

Financial engineering via tax records to keep income below 400%FPLhttps://t.co/raS4GZ7RP9

Spike of ppl making 100% FPL in non Expansion states https://t.co/0XMzr21wj6

— David Anderson (@bjdickmayhew) December 21, 2017

 

If someone knows that they are likely to have significant claims during the course of a year and they know that their unengineered reported/estimated income is really close to a threshold that triggers a significant reduction in cost sharing expenses, I would be surprised if there is not some financial engineering going on. There are a number of ways to legally reduce the income that is counted for ACA subsidies. One of the simplest is to increase any IRA contributions as Louise Norris explains:

If you’re not already contributing the maximum allowable amount to an individual retirement account (IRA), doing so would lower your MAGI (it has to be a traditional IRA; contributions to a Roth IRA are not tax deductible). You and your spouse can each contribute to an IRA, further lowering your total household MAGI.

[Note that the general MAGI calculations require you to add back traditional IRA contributions, but ACA-specific MAGI rules are different–your deductible traditional IRA contributions do lower your ACA-related MAGI.]

The exposure jump from 87% AV Silver plans at 199% FPL and 73% AV Silver plans at 201% FPL is huge. I would like to imagine that people are figuring out how to find ways to stay in higher actuarial value coverage without touching their quality of life or net of medical expenses available cash flow.

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: «On The Road - ?BillinGlendaleCA - Star Trails 1 On The Road – ?BillinGlendaleCA – Star Trails
Next Post: Wednesday Afternoon Open Thread »

Reader Interactions

8Comments

  1. 1.

    wmd

    November 27, 2019 at 10:10 am

    The table has a mixture of %FPL and income (well 100,000 looks like income). It would be of service to give both for a typical taxpayer.

  2. 2.

    dr. bloor

    November 27, 2019 at 10:11 am

    Alas, this is all likely to be little more than wonk-speak for 99% of exchange purchasers.

    And the other 1% doesn’t have the spare change to engineer their incomes down by kicking into a retirement plan.

  3. 3.

    David Anderson

    November 27, 2019 at 10:33 am

    But this is useful information for navigators, assistors, brokers and the family member who helps everyone else with insurance over Thanksgiving weekend.

  4. 4.

    eclare

    November 27, 2019 at 11:27 am

    A good friend of mine is doing exactly this, engineering down to the minimum for subsidies.  Her house is paid for, and she has substantial cash in reserve.

  5. 5.

    ProfDamatu

    November 27, 2019 at 1:38 pm

    Not surprising at all, but looking at that graph really brings home the cruelty of the current CSR formulas  – I mean, really, someone making 250% FPL plus $1 can afford an OOP max of $8150? I don’t think so! Or, more germane to the post – for someone at 300% of FPL, who probably can’t realistically engineer their income downward into CSR territory, that OOP max represents 23% of their gross income. Hell, even someone making 400% FPL can’t swing that on a year-in, year-out basis, as will be necessary if you’ve got a chronic condition.

     

    I realize that when the ACA went into effect, OOP max numbers were more realistic, and that the 250% FPL cutoff for CSR subsidies was probably the best that could be achieved politically, but it still really sucks. As I’ve said before, we’re rapidly approaching a point where the insurance available on the exchanges will be unaffordable to use for almost everyone who doesn’t qualify for CSR subsidies (and, looking at the formulas, I would guess that many, many of those who qualify for the lower end of the subsidies will be in the same boat soon enough). Don’t get me wrong, it still beats being uninsured, but it’s scary to realize that even if you’ve saved up enough money to meet your cost-sharing, once that money is gone, it’s gone, and should you have another bad year, you’re looking at bankruptcy.

  6. 6.

    Chris Johnson

    November 27, 2019 at 2:18 pm

    @ProfDamatu: Yeah, it’s a death sentence.

    I inherited money in the last year since my parents died, that being about the only way anybody gets wealth today. Having gone from desperate poverty to ‘there is a zip code in my bank account’ (albeit on the extreme low five figures) has gentled my reactions to the insurance-industry posts a LOT. It’s just less upsetting to see when I’m not juggling bills and food and constantly having to think about the exact balance in my bank account vs. credit cards etc. and how to make it all work.

    I still can’t have any sort of health care. Anything that might happen runs the risk of being an order of magnitude beyond what I can cover out of my newly-expanded bank account, so it’s still a complete non-starter.

    I just have to exercise, eat right, lose weight, drive careful etc. and I can do that in better spirits since the price of good tools and good opportunities for progress is WAY LESS than the price of a medical disaster. So it’s basically keep my spirits up and hope to stay lucky. I can’t be mad at David anymore. It feels less like I’m being taunted with stuff I’m supposed to care about: now it’s become clear that the situation is untenable, and when I STILL can’t cover those situations I’m gonna just write them off completely. If I die, I die. Until then I’m going to try to help others and I’ll be in better spirits (much like David is trying to help others, just in a way that doesn’t have much to do with me)

  7. 7.

    Julie

    November 27, 2019 at 4:06 pm

    For retired people older than 59 1/2, but younger than the Medicare age of 65, a way to engineer income down is to limit withdrawals from your IRA or 401(k). This strategy works best if you have extra cash sitting around to cover expenses over and above your MAGI. It helps to have low expenses (eg. a paid-off mortgage).

  8. 8.

    OldVet

    November 28, 2019 at 3:44 pm

    I read this article even though it is not relevant to my life situation. The article seems like more reasons for Medicare for All.

Comments are closed.

Primary Sidebar

Recent Comments

  • Roger Moore on This Is Who They Are – Wisconsin Extremists on the Ballot on April 4 (Open Thread) (Mar 29, 2023 @ 2:53pm)
  • cain on This Is Who They Are – Wisconsin Extremists on the Ballot on April 4 (Open Thread) (Mar 29, 2023 @ 2:53pm)
  • trollhattan on A BFD on regulatory action (Mar 29, 2023 @ 2:51pm)
  • JoyceH on This Is Who They Are – Wisconsin Extremists on the Ballot on April 4 (Open Thread) (Mar 29, 2023 @ 2:51pm)
  • MisterForkbeard on This Is Who They Are – Wisconsin Extremists on the Ballot on April 4 (Open Thread) (Mar 29, 2023 @ 2:50pm)

Balloon Juice Meetups!

All Meetups
Seattle Meetup coming up on April 4!

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

Fundraising 2023-24

Wis*Dems Supreme Court + SD-8

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
We All Need A Little Kindness
Classified Documents: A Primer
State & Local Elections Discussion

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Mailing List Signup
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)

Twitter / Spoutible

Balloon Juice (Spoutible)
WaterGirl (Spoutible)
TaMara (Spoutible)
John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
TaMara
David Anderson
Major Major Major Major
ActualCitizensUnited

Join the Fight!

Join the Fight Signup Form
All Join the Fight Posts

Balloon Juice Events

5/14  The Apocalypse
5/20  Home Away from Home
5/29  We’re Back, Baby
7/21  Merging!

Balloon Juice for Ukraine

Donate

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2023 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!