• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

Too often we confuse noise with substance. too often we confuse setbacks with defeat.

Someone should tell Republicans that violence is the last refuge of the incompetent, or possibly the first.

The cruelty is the point; the law be damned.

Thanks to your bullshit, we are now under siege.

Wow, you are pre-disappointed. How surprising.

Second rate reporter says what?

Weird. Rome has an American Pope and America has a Russian President.

I have other things to bitch about but those will have to wait.

Never entrust democracy to any process that requires Republicans to act in good faith.

Not so fun when the rabbit gets the gun, is it?

I like political parties that aren’t owned by foreign adversaries.

Too often we hand the biggest microphones to the cynics and the critics who delight in declaring failure.

If you thought you’d already seen people saying the stupidest things possible on the internet, prepare yourselves.

Democracy cannot function without a free press.

Petty moves from a petty man.

Republicans do not pay their debts.

Balloon Juice, where there is always someone who will say you’re doing it wrong.

“Alexa, change the president.”

Trump’s cabinet: like a magic 8 ball that only gives wrong answers.

Disagreements are healthy; personal attacks are not.

No offense, but this thread hasn’t been about you for quite a while.

The revolution will be supervised.

“A king is only a king if we bow down.” – Rev. William Barber

Humiliatingly small and eclipsed by the derision of millions.

Mobile Menu

  • Seattle Meet-up Post
  • 2025 Activism
  • Targeted Political Fundraising
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • COVID-19
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • 2025 Activism
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • Targeted Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Anderson On Health Insurance / Financial engineering at CSR cut points

Financial engineering at CSR cut points

by David Anderson|  November 27, 20199:56 am| 8 Comments

This post is in: Anderson On Health Insurance

FacebookTweetEmail

I was recently speaking with Juicer who is shopping for an ACA plan.  They are Cost Sharing Reduction (CSR) eligible and their projected income for 2020 is literally a point or two above a major CSR cut-off point where the benefit value changes dramatically.  CSR benefits for people who are not American Indian/Alaskan Natives come in three bands.

Start Income (FPL) End Income (FPL) Silver Actuarial Value
            100%                  149% 94
  150%      199%      87
    200%      250%      73
            250%          infinite 70

 

I converted those actuarial values into a real world example of how one Silver plan spreads out its cost sharing variants.  Data is from the 2020 Landscape Public Use File:

 

Deductible and Out of Pocket Maxes at FPL for Silver CSR Plans

 

We see significant discontinuities as income passes the CSR thresholds.  CSR 94 has a $100 deductible while CSR 87 has a $500 deductible.  The out of pocket maxes have bigger jumps.

Researchers have found that people have engineered their income to qualify for subsidies at 100% FPL and 399% FPL.

 

Financial engineering via tax records to keep income below 400%FPLhttps://t.co/raS4GZ7RP9

Spike of ppl making 100% FPL in non Expansion states https://t.co/0XMzr21wj6

— David Anderson (@bjdickmayhew) December 21, 2017

 

If someone knows that they are likely to have significant claims during the course of a year and they know that their unengineered reported/estimated income is really close to a threshold that triggers a significant reduction in cost sharing expenses, I would be surprised if there is not some financial engineering going on. There are a number of ways to legally reduce the income that is counted for ACA subsidies. One of the simplest is to increase any IRA contributions as Louise Norris explains:

If you’re not already contributing the maximum allowable amount to an individual retirement account (IRA), doing so would lower your MAGI (it has to be a traditional IRA; contributions to a Roth IRA are not tax deductible). You and your spouse can each contribute to an IRA, further lowering your total household MAGI.

[Note that the general MAGI calculations require you to add back traditional IRA contributions, but ACA-specific MAGI rules are different–your deductible traditional IRA contributions do lower your ACA-related MAGI.]

The exposure jump from 87% AV Silver plans at 199% FPL and 73% AV Silver plans at 201% FPL is huge. I would like to imagine that people are figuring out how to find ways to stay in higher actuarial value coverage without touching their quality of life or net of medical expenses available cash flow.

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: «On The Road - ?BillinGlendaleCA - Star Trails 1 On The Road – ?BillinGlendaleCA – Star Trails
Next Post: Wednesday Afternoon Open Thread »

Reader Interactions

8Comments

  1. 1.

    wmd

    November 27, 2019 at 10:10 am

    The table has a mixture of %FPL and income (well 100,000 looks like income). It would be of service to give both for a typical taxpayer.

  2. 2.

    dr. bloor

    November 27, 2019 at 10:11 am

    Alas, this is all likely to be little more than wonk-speak for 99% of exchange purchasers.

    And the other 1% doesn’t have the spare change to engineer their incomes down by kicking into a retirement plan.

  3. 3.

    David Anderson

    November 27, 2019 at 10:33 am

    But this is useful information for navigators, assistors, brokers and the family member who helps everyone else with insurance over Thanksgiving weekend.

  4. 4.

    eclare

    November 27, 2019 at 11:27 am

    A good friend of mine is doing exactly this, engineering down to the minimum for subsidies.  Her house is paid for, and she has substantial cash in reserve.

  5. 5.

    ProfDamatu

    November 27, 2019 at 1:38 pm

    Not surprising at all, but looking at that graph really brings home the cruelty of the current CSR formulas  – I mean, really, someone making 250% FPL plus $1 can afford an OOP max of $8150? I don’t think so! Or, more germane to the post – for someone at 300% of FPL, who probably can’t realistically engineer their income downward into CSR territory, that OOP max represents 23% of their gross income. Hell, even someone making 400% FPL can’t swing that on a year-in, year-out basis, as will be necessary if you’ve got a chronic condition.

     

    I realize that when the ACA went into effect, OOP max numbers were more realistic, and that the 250% FPL cutoff for CSR subsidies was probably the best that could be achieved politically, but it still really sucks. As I’ve said before, we’re rapidly approaching a point where the insurance available on the exchanges will be unaffordable to use for almost everyone who doesn’t qualify for CSR subsidies (and, looking at the formulas, I would guess that many, many of those who qualify for the lower end of the subsidies will be in the same boat soon enough). Don’t get me wrong, it still beats being uninsured, but it’s scary to realize that even if you’ve saved up enough money to meet your cost-sharing, once that money is gone, it’s gone, and should you have another bad year, you’re looking at bankruptcy.

  6. 6.

    Chris Johnson

    November 27, 2019 at 2:18 pm

    @ProfDamatu: Yeah, it’s a death sentence.

    I inherited money in the last year since my parents died, that being about the only way anybody gets wealth today. Having gone from desperate poverty to ‘there is a zip code in my bank account’ (albeit on the extreme low five figures) has gentled my reactions to the insurance-industry posts a LOT. It’s just less upsetting to see when I’m not juggling bills and food and constantly having to think about the exact balance in my bank account vs. credit cards etc. and how to make it all work.

    I still can’t have any sort of health care. Anything that might happen runs the risk of being an order of magnitude beyond what I can cover out of my newly-expanded bank account, so it’s still a complete non-starter.

    I just have to exercise, eat right, lose weight, drive careful etc. and I can do that in better spirits since the price of good tools and good opportunities for progress is WAY LESS than the price of a medical disaster. So it’s basically keep my spirits up and hope to stay lucky. I can’t be mad at David anymore. It feels less like I’m being taunted with stuff I’m supposed to care about: now it’s become clear that the situation is untenable, and when I STILL can’t cover those situations I’m gonna just write them off completely. If I die, I die. Until then I’m going to try to help others and I’ll be in better spirits (much like David is trying to help others, just in a way that doesn’t have much to do with me)

  7. 7.

    Julie

    November 27, 2019 at 4:06 pm

    For retired people older than 59 1/2, but younger than the Medicare age of 65, a way to engineer income down is to limit withdrawals from your IRA or 401(k). This strategy works best if you have extra cash sitting around to cover expenses over and above your MAGI. It helps to have low expenses (eg. a paid-off mortgage).

  8. 8.

    OldVet

    November 28, 2019 at 3:44 pm

    I read this article even though it is not relevant to my life situation. The article seems like more reasons for Medicare for All.

Comments are closed.

Primary Sidebar

On The Road - beckya57 - Copper Canyon, Mexico, April 2025
Image by beckya57 (7/31/25)

World Central Kitchen

Donate

Recent Comments

  • Suzanne on Wednesday Night Open Thread (Jul 9, 2025 @ 8:44pm)
  • Geminid on Open Thread: Good for Rep. Jeffries (Jul 9, 2025 @ 8:43pm)
  • geg6 on Wednesday Night Open Thread (Jul 9, 2025 @ 8:43pm)
  • Jeffro on Wednesday Night Open Thread (Jul 9, 2025 @ 8:42pm)
  • O. Felix Culpa on Goebbels In, Goebbels Out (Open Thread) (Jul 9, 2025 @ 8:42pm)

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
No Kings Protests June 14 2025

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)
Fix Nyms with Apostrophes

Social Media

Balloon Juice
WaterGirl
TaMara
John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
David Anderson
Major Major Major Major
DougJ NYT Pitchbot
mistermix

Keeping Track

Legal Challenges (Lawfare)
Republicans Fleeing Town Halls (TPM)
21 Letters (to Borrow or Steal)
Search Donations from a Brand

Feeling Defeated?  If We Give Up, It's Game Over

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2025 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!