• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

The republican caucus is already covering themselves with something, and it’s not glory.

The poor and middle-class pay taxes, the rich pay accountants, the wealthy pay politicians.

fuckem (in honor of the late great efgoldman)

No offense, but this thread hasn’t been about you for quite a while.

I did not have telepathic declassification on my 2022 bingo card.

You don’t get to peddle hatred on saturday and offer condolences on sunday.

And now I have baud making fun of me. this day can’t get worse.

Battle won, war still ongoing.

Good lord, these people are nuts.

They’re not red states to be hated; they are voter suppression states to be fixed.

We’ve had enough carrots to last a lifetime. break out the sticks.

A sufficient plurality of insane, greedy people can tank any democratic system ever devised, apparently.

T R E 4 5 O N

When do we start airlifting the women and children out of Texas?

After roe, women are no longer free.

I’ve spoken to my cat about this, but it doesn’t seem to do any good.

if you can’t see it, then you are useless in the fight to stop it.

Shallow, uninformed, and lacking identity

Whatever happens next week, the fight doesn’t end.

Hot air and ill-informed banter

It may be funny to you motherfucker, but it’s not funny to me.

Take hopelessness and turn it into resilience.

If senate republicans had any shame, they’d die of it.

They fucked up the fucking up of the fuckup!

Mobile Menu

  • Winnable House Races
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • Balloon Juice 2023 Pet Calendar (coming soon)
  • COVID-19 Coronavirus
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • War in Ukraine
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • 2021-22 Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Anderson On Health Insurance / Great news with big risk adjustment challenges

Great news with big risk adjustment challenges

by David Anderson|  December 5, 20199:57 am| 18 Comments

This post is in: Anderson On Health Insurance

FacebookTweetEmail

This is unabashedly good news:

The FDA has approved elexacaftor, tezacaftor, and ivacaftor as a combination pill (marketed as Trikafta) for treatment of CF in patients >=12. The 3 drugs improve the function of CFTR protein resulting from a mutation responsible for ~90% of CF cases https://t.co/G7lAufg94o

— JAMA (@JAMA_current) December 5, 2019

 

And now I will be a ball of fun at parties. This is also a massive risk adjustment problem.

 

This drug cocktail will be expensive.  The list price is over $300,000 per person per year.  It is not a cure, it is a chronic medication.  The economics of this particular drug category don’t support the idea that there will be large rebates so the net vs gross price spread won’t be huge.

 

Cystic Fibrosis is not randomly distributed in the population.  It is clustered in families as it is a genetic condition.  When insurers were setting their 2020 rates, cystic fibrosis treatments were a small population with a particular mutation who had access to a very expensive and effective treatment and most everyone else.  Now there is a big technological shock that is expensive and will quickly become the new standard of care for most individuals with cystic fibrosis.  Risk adjustment payments either through “widget” payments like in Medicare Advantage where an additional diagnosis triggers a lump sum transfer, or revenue neutral risk adjustment like in the ACA markets will be significantly underpaying for the soon to be standard of care for CF.

 

When an insurer is obligated to cover a standard of care that is not supported by net revenue which is premiums plus reinsurance plus risk adjustment flows, the incentive to dodge and delay treatment increases quickly.  I would be shocked if insurers do not institute pre-authorization, screening and strict limits on this new CF drug cocktail for the first year.  This will bring lawsuits or at least the threat of lawsuits of course, but until the revenue model catches up to the care model, insurers will have an incentive to delay care payments.

 

As a side note, technological shocks that are effective but expensive also blow up strict block grants in Medicaid.

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « Speaker Pelosi’s Statement
Next Post: SNAP Back »

Reader Interactions

18Comments

  1. 1.

    WaterGirl

    December 5, 2019 at 10:18 am

    Hey David, how did your presentation go yesterday?

  2. 2.

    Immanentize

    December 5, 2019 at 10:22 am

    @WaterGirl: 
    Ditto Water Girl. How did it go?

    Also, my cousin worked on the first treatments for CF at Genentech almost 20 years ago. Research to patient takes time….

  3. 3.

    Victor Matheson

    December 5, 2019 at 10:28 am

    I’ve got multiple questions here.

    1. Is this an expensive cocktail to manufacture or is all of the expense upfront in the R&D and clinical trial portion? Like, enzyme replacement drugs are horrifically expensive, but that is in part because even once the therapy is developed and approved, the enzymes themselves are absolute terrors to produce efficiently, so one would expect those drug prices to remain super high even if the pharma company didn’t need to make back its development costs. Is that the case here?
    2. Why is the revenue expected at only $630 million? 27,000 people paying $311K is more than 10x that much. Will only 7% of the population be getting treatment or will there really be some major discounts to some insurers? Or is the $630 million number profit rather than revenue?
    3. Isn’t there a good reason to believe that copy-cat drugs will be developed? Once that first Hep C cure came around (Solvaldi), it made so much money for the first company that there are now competing drugs (e.g. Mavyret) that are both better (98% vs. 90% cure rates) and cheaper ($94,500 vs. $39,600).
    4. And here is the worst question – in the US the estimated value of a quality adjusted year of life is $50K-$150K. At $300K does this drug satisfy any reasonable cost benefit analysis. As a society, are we obligated to provide $300K per year in benefits so that a person can have a 14% improvement in lung function? I know this is a terrible moral question, but this is why you get paid the big bucks.
  4. 4.

    taumaturgo

    December 5, 2019 at 10:59 am

    When an insurer is obligated to cover a standard of care that is not supported by net revenue which is premiums plus reinsurance plus risk adjustment flows, the incentive to dodge and delay treatment increases quickly. I would be shocked if insurers do not institute pre-authorization, screening and strict limits on this new CF drug cocktail for the first year. This will bring lawsuits or at least the threat of lawsuits of course, but until the revenue model catches up to the care model, insurers will have an incentive to delay care payments.

    I for one have not seen a better description of the insane profits before the healthcare system that is callously incentivized to toss chronically ill folks into the let them die bin. If this system is not broken, then what is?

  5. 5.

    dr. bloor

    December 5, 2019 at 11:03 am

    @Victor Matheson: #4 is actually the best question, because even after you trim all the “fat” out of healthcare, hang the CEOs from lamp posts, and tie all physician reimbursement to Medicaid-20%, our ability to make medical advances and keep people healthier and alive will inevitably outstrip our ability as a society to pay for it.

  6. 6.

    David Anderson

    December 5, 2019 at 11:21 am

    @Victor Matheson: Yep, #4 is my big question too

     

    #3 I don’t think there is a lot of potential competition in the pipeline at the moment.

  7. 7.

    David Anderson

    December 5, 2019 at 11:24 am

    @WaterGirl: It went really well.  I had the luxury of presenting positive news/good stuff during a briefing session where most of the papers were premised on DOOM.

     

    The best part of the entire thing was everything that surrounded the presentation.  I got to meet lots of professional colleagues who I’ve either been in Twitter contact with or was just generally aware of due to them writing awesome things that I enjoyed reading and we could talk and geek out over a great dinner or even better tacos.

     

    By 3:00pm yesterday, I was peopled out and wanted to curl up in  ball over in a corner for a while, but it was really good.

  8. 8.

    Capri

    December 5, 2019 at 11:30 am

    I have a huge vested interest in this as my grand daughter has CF. She just turned 2 and her parents and health team are eagerly waiting for the day she’s old enough to go on this drug.  The state where she lives (and I believe most if not all of the others) have state-supplied funds for sick kids that are separate from regular insurance.  This should buffer the effect for children eligible for these programs. The issue will be with adults that need the drug.

    It’s possible that from an insurance point of view, paying for the drug could actually be a net cost saving. If it prevents weeks and weeks of hospital stays, transplants, and all the other things that are currently part of  living with CF it might actually be a wash.

  9. 9.

    David Anderson

    December 5, 2019 at 11:46 am

    @Capri: Given that CF risk adjusts on the ACA at ~$30,000 to $50,000 a year I don’t think that any plausible set of assumptions would make a $300,000/year drug cost savings

     

    https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2019-04-25/pdf/2019-08017.pdf

  10. 10.

    BethanyAnne

    December 5, 2019 at 12:00 pm

    I did my Marketplace enrollment last night. I’m so happy! I will get a Silver plan in 2020 for money that only got me Bronze in 2019. 8 of meds are genetic, and have a $0 copay. Woot! I won’t have to rely on Kroger savings club to drop my med costs.

  11. 11.

    Adam Lang

    December 5, 2019 at 12:43 pm

    One wonders how long it will be before a generic enters the market.

     

    My over/under, ceteris paribus, is 26 years.

  12. 12.

    WaterGirl

    December 5, 2019 at 1:16 pm

    @David Anderson: So glad to hear that!

  13. 13.

    Martin

    December 5, 2019 at 1:17 pm

    So, my stepfather has a rare genetic condition – it’s a form of MD, and he and my mom are going through end of life planning, because even though he’s only 62, we’re kind of in any-day-now territory. He’s had multiple surgeries to extend his QOL, but he’s running out of options. They’re headed up to see a specialist that is trialing a gene therapy solution that might work. His challenge is that it’s a very rare condition, so much so that they’ve traced it back to a single couple as the origin of the defect. Needless to say, this is all going to be out of pocket since he’s too young for Medicare and has a shitty policy given the options left in Iowa. Thankfully we should be able to afford it, and it’s worth it, of course, but having to write 6 figure checks makes me cranky.

     

    But I have a much greater appreciation for events like this now, and it makes me feel good that a bunch of families get to breathe at least a little bit easier. But I look at the 23 and Me discussion we had a few days ago and think about our lack of single payer, and recognize there are so many policy solutions you can wrap around this problem but eventually they’re all going to fail. In the case of CF, it’s detected early, so there’s not much that insurers can do, but my stepfathers condition doesn’t usually manifest symptoms until you’re in your 40s or 50s.

  14. 14.

    Mousebumples

    December 5, 2019 at 2:38 pm

    I work for a PBM, and I know we’ve seen some requests come through for this already. Some are new starts (didn’t have the genetic alleles needed for Symdeko approval, for example) but a lot of patients are transitioning from Symdeko to Trikafta. I’m not sure if the cost is much different, off hand, though…

  15. 15.

    lurker3000

    December 5, 2019 at 3:55 pm

    I’m interested in #1. And if the costs will be this high for other countries. Great news for people I know with CF–less good if they will bankrupt themselves to be healthy.

  16. 16.

    Capri

    December 5, 2019 at 4:46 pm

    @David Anderson:  That seems very light, I wonder if they are counting the baseline costs and not complications.

    I was under the impression that a single 3-5 week hospital stay could cost 30K, transplants cost millions.

  17. 17.

    MoCA Ace

    December 5, 2019 at 7:03 pm

    @Capri:

    Ditto on the vested interest.  Had a good conversation with my sons fiance last weekend and she is already on one of the three drugs at a cost of over $6,000 per month… along with the other drugs and routine CF clinics her medical costs are well over $150,000 per year.  She had a conversation with her doctor and he is recommending the treatment as she has a difficult case (her description).

     

    They are waiting until she is stable in her insurance again as once again she was dumped from her state ins plan since her siblings college scholarships put the family over some arbitrary fucking income limit.   In the last three years she has been on three different plans and said she has probably spent several days each year missing classes because she has to deal with insurance issues.

     

    I also got a peek into the sacrifices her family has been forced to make due to her, and a siblings, diagnosis.  keeping themselves purposely poor or near-poor so they would be eligible for health care assistance.  Trying to hide income so they can have some of the nice things other (lower) middle class families take for granted, laundering money through relatives so they don’t loose their health care etc.  Its sickening that we do this to families in this country.

  18. 18.

    SP123

    December 5, 2019 at 9:28 pm

    Long time reader, very occasional commenter, but I work at the company that developed this so I can answer the questions above.  (Typical disclaimer, I’m not speaking for the company, just pointing you to statements or facts that are already public.)

    1. It is a combination of synthetic small molecules, not a biologic, so cost of production is low compared to something like a protein therapy.  I don’t know the exact numbers but they’re not terribly complex molecules to make.  So it’s mostly covering R&D- we’re still working on treatments for the remaining 10% for whom this drug doesn’t work, and that is primarily funded out of the revenues of the existing drugs and the expected revenue from the new one.

    2. This I don’t know, but as noted in 14 some of the patients taking the triple will be switching from an existing drug rather than representing new patients.

    3. Interesting you should use this example, because one of the earliest drugs from the company was one of the first HCV drugs.  It shot up to over $1B in sales, and was promptly superseded by improved competitor drugs to the point that we stopped making it altogether only three years later.  #6 is correct, there are other companies developing CF drugs but nothing that seems likely to follow in the near term.

    4. Can’t really speak to this other than to suggest reading some of the patient accounts of their reactions when they heard that the drug was approved.  One thing to note is that these drugs are causing the prevalence of CF to rise worldwide, which sounds weird or suspicious until you realize it’s because CF used to be a death sentence and now people with the disease are staying alive long enough that there’s an easily measurable increase in the total number of living people with CF.

Comments are closed.

Primary Sidebar

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

2023 Pet Calendars

Pet Calendar Preview: A
Pet Calendar Preview: B

*Calendars can not be ordered until Cafe Press gets their calendar paper in.

Recent Comments

  • Aussie Sheila on Tuesday Morning Open Thread: State of the Union Prep (Feb 7, 2023 @ 10:52am)
  • Baud on Tuesday Morning Open Thread: State of the Union Prep (Feb 7, 2023 @ 10:52am)
  • rikyrah on Tuesday Morning Open Thread: State of the Union Prep (Feb 7, 2023 @ 10:52am)
  • zhena gogolia on Tuesday Morning Open Thread: State of the Union Prep (Feb 7, 2023 @ 10:50am)
  • catclub on Tuesday Morning Open Thread: State of the Union Prep (Feb 7, 2023 @ 10:49am)

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
We All Need A Little Kindness
Favorite Dogs & Cats
Classified Documents: A Primer

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Mailing List Signup
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)

Front-pager Twitter

John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
TaMara
David Anderson
ActualCitizensUnited

Shop Amazon via this link to support Balloon Juice   

Join the Fight!

Join the Fight Signup Form
All Join the Fight Posts

Balloon Juice Events

5/14  The Apocalypse
5/20  Home Away from Home
5/29  We’re Back, Baby
7/21  Merging!

Balloon Juice for Ukraine

Donate

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2023 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!