• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

We cannot abandon the truth and remain a free nation.

Teach a man to fish, and he’ll sit in a boat all day drinking beer.

If you are still in the GOP, you are an extremist.

Republicans are radicals, not conservatives.

Despite his magical powers, I don’t think Trump is thinking this through, to be honest.

The words do not have to be perfect.

The revolution will be supervised.

If senate republicans had any shame, they’d die of it.

Bad news for Ron DeSantis is great news for America.

As long as McCarthy is Speaker, the House will never be in order.

Stop using mental illness to avoid talking about armed white supremacy.

The worst democrat is better than the best republican.

Trump’s legal defense is going to be a dumpster fire inside a clown car on a derailing train.

After roe, women are no longer free.

White supremacy is terrorism.

Bark louder, little dog.

We are builders in a constant struggle with destroyers. let’s win this.

Russian mouthpiece, go fuck yourself.

fuckem (in honor of the late great efgoldman)

The cruelty is the point; the law be damned.

This has so much WTF written all over it that it is hard to comprehend.

This fight is for everything.

Chutkan laughs. Lauro sits back down.

I’m pretty sure there’s only one Jack Smith.

Mobile Menu

  • Winnable House Races
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • Balloon Juice 2023 Pet Calendar (coming soon)
  • COVID-19 Coronavirus
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • War in Ukraine
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • 2021-22 Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Open Threads / Excellent Links / Pertinent Read: “The First Woman Scholar to Translate ‘The Art of War’ Vastly Improves It”

Pertinent Read: “The First Woman Scholar to Translate ‘The Art of War’ Vastly Improves It”

by Anne Laurie|  January 7, 20209:20 pm| 112 Comments

This post is in: Excellent Links, Foreign Affairs, Military

FacebookTweetEmail

If pressed to extract a single overriding ‘message’ from the text, it would be this:
Perform your calculations for everything liable to calculation, but also think very deeply about what people are capable of. — (from the Amazon link)

Notable misinterpreters of The Art of War—including Trump—view it as a treatise on how to crush one’s enemies rather than as a manual on converting enemies to your point of view https://t.co/2tr0kvWceU

— GEN (@GENmag) January 7, 2020

This might be the book that finally convinces me to download Kindle, even though I find reading more than two pages of text on a screen exhausting:

… Michael Nylan, a professor of early Chinese history at the University of California, Berkeley, and the author of a few academic books of history and criticism, has completed a fresh translation of The Art of War — fresh both for the fact that she is the first woman scholar to do so and also because she has worked to move the reader’s focus away from the book’s brute military elements, which comprise only two of the 13 chapters, and toward its psychological and peacemaking ones…

GEN: How is your interpretation of “The Art of War” fundamentally different from previous ones?
Michael Nylan: The people who’ve been interested in The Art of War are, of course, not only men, but [most] tend to be interested in the war part of it when, actually, The Art of War is pretty much an anti-war treatise. It’s only if you haven’t been able to outmaneuver your enemies by various means and you’re attacked that The Art of War will tell you how to conduct a war as ruthlessly as possible — but that’s about two chapters’ worth out of 13, and most of the rest is far more interesting…

Throughout the book, there’s unusual concern for those at the lowest rungs of society. There’s unusual concern that you don’t kill innocent civilians. There’s unusual concern that you consult people as widely as possible and that when you have to calculate going to war, you do so in the hopes that you will be killing as small a number as possible…

What’s a significant, specific divergence between your translation and previous ones?
For one, many of the previous translations treat it more or less like Machiavelli — all about deception and duplicity when, actually, deception and duplicity are pretty much [confined to] a single chapter that is usually translated as “spies.” For instance, the same word that means “spies” means “a gap that has been introduced,” so a lot of that chapter should not specifically be about spies but rather about how to introduce a division within the enemy’s population while keeping no division within the home forces…

Was your translation a collaborative process?
I had three students fairly well along in their PhD program, all of whom had a specific interest in Sun Tzu, so we formed a little working group. Since one of them had done two tours in Iraq, he brought quite a bit of expertise that the rest of us lacked. I believe that none of us, no matter how smart, is sufficient unto a good text. People will have insights that would simply escape me…

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: «Auto Draft 1 Iran Fires On US Airbase
Next Post: Australia is Still Burning: An Update From The Mighty Trowel »

Reader Interactions

112Comments

  1. 1.

    Kamala.Harris.2020

    January 7, 2020 at 9:22 pm

    Yea for women!

  2. 2.

    Woodrow/asim

    January 7, 2020 at 9:29 pm

    This might be the book that finally convinces me to download Kindle

    There’s a Hardcover version listed at that Amazon link, as well.

    Unless I’m missing something?

     

    And thanks for this. As someone who’s read up on Daoism, it’s always a pleasure to point out to folx who think of it as Chinese Clausewitz that Art of War is seen by a number of scholars as a Daoist treatise, and that the elements Prof. Nylan appears to be foregrounding are how I’ve always approached the text.

  3. 3.

    Martin

    January 7, 2020 at 9:29 pm

    Yay for California!

  4. 4.

    SiubhanDuinne

    January 7, 2020 at 9:32 pm

    How very timely.

  5. 5.

    Patricia Kayden

    January 7, 2020 at 9:33 pm

    You’re a liar. No Democratic candidate or leader has “mourned the loss” of Soleimani. I’m a conservative Republican that used to be an avid fan of yours. Now, I can’t even respect you, much less vote for you. Sick of all the casual & conscious lying. It’s disqualifying. https://t.co/PnOdVTHB4V— Heath Mayo (@HeathMayo) January 7, 2020

  6. 6.

    Bill Arnold

    January 7, 2020 at 9:34 pm

    An excuse to read “The Art of War” for the first time. Kindle edition bought.

  7. 7.

    Adam L Silverman

    January 7, 2020 at 9:40 pm

    I don’t mean to be contrary, but almost no modern/contemporary translation takes this approach. The traditional/older translations did, but none of the versions I’ve seen translated since the 1990s do this. So while she is absolutely correct, this is not actually something new. I have over a 1/2 dozen translations of The Art of War in either traditional print or as ebooks, and with the exception of one of the older/classic translations, all of them emphasize that Sun Tzu, or the collection of people whose writings have been attributed to Sun Tzu, is seeking to focus on how not to make war, rather than how to make war. My two preferred translations, which I used excerpts from when teaching The Art of War in Seminar 12 for four years at USAWC during the core course Theory of War and Strategy and as part of my elective on Culture for Strategy and Policy, focus on Sun Tzu not preaching war, but preaching how to develop and implement strategies to avoid war. My actual preferred translation, which is not the better of the two, is preferred because the translator’s introduction dives deep into this and, because this translator has also translated most of the major extant Taoist canon, is able to both situate The Art of War and tie it directly into the larger Taoist teachings on the use of violence and war. In many ways The Art of War is Taoism’s equivalent to a just war theory in addition to being a treatise on strategic development and implementation. And the Taoist canon makes it very, very clear that:

    Shiny weapons are instruments of ill omen, use them only as a last resort.

    So while I look forward to reading this translation, what is new here is that we have a female translator and commenter, not that we suddenly have a properly contextualized translation.

  8. 8.

    Anne Laurie

    January 7, 2020 at 9:44 pm

    @Woodrow/asim: There’s a Hardcover version listed at that Amazon link, as well.

    Selfish admission: I’m $10 kindle-interested, but — given the stacks of unread hard-copy books overcrowding our house — more dubious at spending $25 on yet another aspirational volume!

  9. 9.

    geg6

    January 7, 2020 at 9:45 pm

    My memory on this is hazy, but Sun Tzu was touched on in a philosophy class I took in undergrad and it seems to me that the professor had a similar take on the text overall.  He said it was more about ways to avoid war and only counseled war as a last resort after careful counsel and planning.  He said people who called it a treatise on war hadn’t read it.

  10. 10.

    Adam L Silverman

    January 7, 2020 at 9:46 pm

    Before someone asks, this is my preferred translation not because there aren’t better translators, but because of the translator’s having translated almost all of the extant Taoist canon and his ability to situate The Art of War within it. This is very evident in his “translator’s introduction”:

    https://www.amazon.com/Art-War-Sun-Tzu/dp/1590302257/ref=sr_1_2?keywords=the+art+of+war+cleary&qid=1578451284&s=books&sr=1-2

    You can find Cleary’s translator’s introduction at this link:

    https://www.bestjudo.com/review/01172/art-war-sun-tzu-cleary

  11. 11.

    jl

    January 7, 2020 at 9:47 pm

    @Woodrow/asim: ” Nylan appears to be foregrounding are how I’ve always approached the text. ”

    I don’t know ancient Chinese, or any Chinese. So, I am at the mercy of translators. But I don’t remember The Art of War as a text devoted to ruthless destruction, and I certainly remember reading commentaries that said very differently. It wasn’t just a ‘Drive your enemies before you, and rejoice in the lamentations of their women” book.  From reading the link, and some examples given there, looks like done very carefully and thoughtfully, so I’m eager to read it.

    Similarly, I’ve read commentaries on The Prince that argue that it contains a lot of snark. It isn’t consistent with many of Machiavelli’s other writings on politics and history which show a sympathy for early democratic impulses in Italy at the time. it was written in odd circumstances, IIRC. Machiavelli was trying to get some local tyrant to spring him from prison? Anyone know?

  12. 12.

    Anne Laurie

    January 7, 2020 at 9:48 pm

    @Adam L Silverman:  Thanks!

  13. 13.

    jl

    January 7, 2020 at 9:49 pm

    @Adam L Silverman: Thanks for the link.

    @geg6: “He said it was more about ways to avoid war and only counseled war as a last resort after careful counsel and planning.  He said people who called it a treatise on war hadn’t read it. ”

    That is consistent with how I remember the book. But some people with fixed mindsets find it easy to completely misconstrue a text. Or ignore anything that they don’t like or don’t find useful for their own hobby horses.

  14. 14.

    Adam L Silverman

    January 7, 2020 at 9:50 pm

    @geg6: That has been the prevailing view of The Art of War since as far back as I can remember engaging with the text, which is the early 90s. Those initial engagements were because I was a martial artist. Ultimately they gave way to engaging with the text for professional reasons. There’s a lot of material in the Bin Fa (Art of War) literature, and a lot that isn’t Sun Tzu or even a response to him, but The Art of War has not been presented in translation and/or taught as pro war for as long as I can remember.

  15. 15.

    Adam L Silverman

    January 7, 2020 at 9:51 pm

    @Anne Laurie: I’m not sure if this is mansplaining or Taosplaining or both, but you’re welcome.

  16. 16.

    jl

    January 7, 2020 at 9:53 pm

    @Adam L Silverman: Nerdsplaining.

    As for the book, maybe recent misinterpretations stem from BS business tycoon pro-tip vulgarizations that interpret the book as a guide to how to get everything your way, one way or another. With total war as last resort.

  17. 17.

    Barbara

    January 7, 2020 at 9:54 pm

    @Adam L Silverman: She seems to be merging the translations with the dominant contemporary reaction to the translation.

    I’m sick of war.  I am so angry and dispirited right now I would like to scream.  So I don’t think I’ll be reading any translation anytime soon.

  18. 18.

    Anne Laurie

    January 7, 2020 at 9:54 pm

    @jl: Similarly, I’ve read commentaries on The Prince that argue that it contains a lot of snark. It isn’t consistent with many of Machiavelli’s other writings on politics and history which show a sympathy for early democratic impulses in Italy at the time. it was written in odd circumstances, IIRC. Machiavelli was trying to get some local tyrant to spring him from prison? Anyone know?

    Yup.  Nylan actually argues specifically, in the Amazon extract, that Machiavelli was a specific person arguing to a group of people who could be expected to understand what we call ‘snark’… including understanding what could and could NOT be written under their shared political system.  Art of War, on the other hand, is a treatise passed down in manuscript form from a semi-mythologized past; every individual who wrote out a new copy of the ‘original’ text would’ve made amendments, intentionally or not, during the process.

  19. 19.

    Martin

    January 7, 2020 at 9:54 pm

    Trump tweets that all is well, so far so good!

    Maybe we can get some PhDs to translate his tweets into something sensible.

  20. 20.

    Adam L Silverman

    January 7, 2020 at 9:55 pm

    Basically, as long as you don’t read this guy’s version of The Art of War, almost any modern translation is good.

    Pertinent Read: "The First Woman Scholar to Translate ‘The Art of War’ Vastly Improves It"

    Also, that’s a four banger, automatic mustang. And despite those unit crest stickers, the Blue Footed Booby of Budapest has never been assigned to USSOCOM, nor was he ever a Green Beret/US Army Special Forces.

  21. 21.

    Adam L Silverman

    January 7, 2020 at 9:55 pm

    @jl: I’ve avoided the business school takes on Sun Tzu because I basically try to ignore the business school takes on everything if at all possible.

  22. 22.

    Martin

    January 7, 2020 at 9:56 pm

    @Adam L Silverman: Don’t be mean to cosplayers, Adam.

  23. 23.

    Adam L Silverman

    January 7, 2020 at 9:56 pm

    @Barbara: I understand. That said, I still highly recommend reading Cleary’s translator’s introduction. I think you’ll find it full of good analysis.

  24. 24.

    Anne Laurie

    January 7, 2020 at 9:56 pm

    @Adam L Silverman: It’s sincere!  I haven’t read even a translation of the book (just extracts, over the course of 40 years), so I’m genuinely grateful for feedback from someone who knows what he’s talking about.

  25. 25.

    Martin

    January 7, 2020 at 9:57 pm

    @Adam L Silverman: Go for the video game takes.

    Steal their hats. 

  26. 26.

    jl

    January 7, 2020 at 9:58 pm

    @Anne Laurie:  Don’t want to get off track from Art of War, but I do remember a few passages like that.

    One, paraphrasing, went something like “Try to keep the common people out of your fights, for they only want for the powerful to stay out of their way and let them alone, so that they can prosper”

    I can’t remember specific passages from the Art of War, but my memory of the spirit of some of them is ‘Don’t be dumbshit, look before you leap”.

  27. 27.

    Jim, Foolish Literalist

    January 7, 2020 at 9:58 pm

    Leadership and shit

    onald J. Trump‏Verified account@realDonaldTrump11m11 minutes ago
    All is well! Missiles launched from Iran at two military bases located in Iraq. Assessment of casualties & damages taking place now. So far, so good! We have the most powerful and well equipped military anywhere in the world, by far! I will be making a statement tomorrow morning.

    “So for, so good!” He’s alone and tweeting.

  28. 28.

    Adam L Silverman

    January 7, 2020 at 9:59 pm

    @Anne Laurie: It is also, without almost any doubt, not actually written by the historic Sun Tzu, but is a collection of teachings that were attributed to him for publication purposes. And the best translations come with the five commentaries.

    I also highly recommend the Japanese Art of War – Cleary has done a translation of that as well. Takuan Soho’s Unfettered Mind: Letters from the Zen Master to the Sword Master is also excellent.

  29. 29.

    Adam L Silverman

    January 7, 2020 at 10:00 pm

    @Martin: Every time I see that picture I hear in my head:
    “It’s just a jump to the left…”

  30. 30.

    ?BillinGlendaleCA

    January 7, 2020 at 10:00 pm

    @Adam L Silverman:

    I basically try to ignore the business school takes on everything if at all possible.

    Wise decision.

  31. 31.

    Barbara

    January 7, 2020 at 10:01 pm

    @Adam L Silverman: Thanks.  Since you mentioned a Mustang, let me take this opportunity to mention OT that the Mustang that was driven by Steve McQueen in Bullet is being auctioned off on January 10 on tv, one of those Mecum auto auctions.  Turns out, it’s been parked in a barn in Tennessee since 1980, after being driven by the guy who bought it from the production company more or less as a family vehicle.

  32. 32.

    ?BillinGlendaleCA

    January 7, 2020 at 10:02 pm

    @Adam L Silverman: “Damnit Janet”.

  33. 33.

    (((CassandraLeo)))

    January 7, 2020 at 10:04 pm

    @jl: Correct (well, I don’t remember on the bit about getting sprung out of prison, but it definitely wasn’t sincere). In fact Machiavelli “dedicated” The Prince to the Medici family, who had imprisoned and tortured him. The idea that he meant it sincerely is not supported by little known writings such as literally everything else he ever wrote. Discourses on Livy is a good overview of Machiavelli’s actual beliefs.

    While I’m at it, the Marquis de Sade is also frequently misinterpreted by English-speaking readers. He is not endorsing the depravity of his characters; he is using them to condemn inequalities within society. Politically, Sade supported a property-free utopia and was appalled at the violence of the Reign of Terror, making him almost a prototypical anarcho-communist, but his political writings are rarely read by the English-speaking world, to the point where his name, like Machiavelli’s, has become synonymous with a form of behaviour he was writing to condemn.* Then again, so has Orwell’s, and he was English.

    Regarding The Art of War, this translation seems quite apposite to our times, even if it’s not as unprecedented as it’s being made out to be. I’ll have to give Sun Tzu more attention.

    *I should note that Sade was also accused of monstrous personal conduct, though, which if true would certainly make him, perhaps least amongst other things, a massive hypocrite, but due to the nature of the French justice system at the time (people were assumed guilty until proven innocent), it’s difficult to know whether some of those accusations were fabrications by political opponents. Some of them seem so outlandish that I lean towards thinking they almost have to have been, but others seem plausible. A deeply problematic figure, but one who nonetheless does not wholly deserve the reputation he has in the English-speaking world.

  34. 34.

    Adam L Silverman

    January 7, 2020 at 10:05 pm

    @Anne Laurie: On a related note, I highly recommend Lars Martin Fosse’s introduction in his translation to The Baghavad Gita. When I taught the Gita as part of my Culture, Strategy, and Policy course I assigned his translator’s introduction, but had the students actually read from The Baghavad Gita According to Ghandi:

    https://www.amazon.com/Bhagavad-Gita-According-Gandhi-ebook/dp/B00J96VLCM/ref=sr_1_fkmr0_1?keywords=Ghandi%27s+baghavad+gita&qid=1578452615&sr=8-1-fkmr0

    You can find Fosse’s introduction here:

    http://library.umac.mo/ebooks/b17771201.pdf

  35. 35.

    Another Scott

    January 7, 2020 at 10:05 pm

    @jl:

    Not that one in particular, but I like this one:

    “If your opponent is of choleric temper, seek to irritate him. Pretend to be weak, that he may grow arrogant.”
    ― Sun Tzu, The Art of War

    Cheers,
    Scott.

  36. 36.

    Raven Onthill

    January 7, 2020 at 10:05 pm

    @Anne Laurie: doesn’t have to be Amazon (I hate doing business with any firm which runs unsafe workplaces.) Google and Apple also have it available.

  37. 37.

    lamh36

    January 7, 2020 at 10:06 pm

    @MattMurph24
    33m33 minutes ago
    More
    The lack of caring about potential Iraqi casualties is disgusting.

     

    I believe reports are that there are Iraqi casualties.  I gotta say not surprised by Chump co doing this, but I am  taken aback by the seemingly inadvertent dismissal of those casualities by folks who should be more fair and balanced!

    Smh…

  38. 38.

    jl

    January 7, 2020 at 10:07 pm

    @(((CassandraLeo))): “Discourses on Livy is a good overview of Machiavelli’s actual beliefs.”

    After I read commentaries that agree with you on The Prince, I read most of that book, which shows a completely different mindset.

  39. 39.

    Adam L Silverman

    January 7, 2020 at 10:07 pm

    @Barbara: I saw an article about that. Are you going to bid?

  40. 40.

    Adam L Silverman

    January 7, 2020 at 10:07 pm

    @?BillinGlendaleCA: She’s got a lot of explaining to do right now.

  41. 41.

    jl

    January 7, 2020 at 10:08 pm

    @Another Scott: More likely that the Iranians have read The Art of War than Trump has.

  42. 42.

    Bill Arnold

    January 7, 2020 at 10:08 pm

    @Adam L Silverman:
    Thanks, kindle edition bought ($1.99).
    I’ll buy paper for the one I like best.

  43. 43.

    Splitting Image

    January 7, 2020 at 10:09 pm

    Similarly, I’ve read commentaries on The Prince that argue that it contains a lot of snark. It isn’t consistent with many of Machiavelli’s other writings on politics and history which show a sympathy for early democratic impulses in Italy at the time. it was written in odd circumstances, IIRC. Machiavelli was trying to get some local tyrant to spring him from prison? Anyone know?

    I don’t know how much snark was intended, but the basic thesis of the book is that a ruler will always either die in power or be murdered on his way out of it. Assuming the first is preferable, a smart ruler will devote just about all his time to making sure he stays in power. On the other hand, he also thought that the best way to stay in power was to keep the public sufficiently on your side that they would fight your opponents for you instead of taking their chances with the other guy.

    Machiavelli developed his political theories at greater length in The Discourses, which are mostly a discussion of ancient Roman history. He makes no bones about preferring the Republic era to the Empire, and he thought the Romans did better in the early years when they gave conquered people Roman citizenship rather than later when they treated them like subject states.

  44. 44.

    lamh36

    January 7, 2020 at 10:10 pm

    Ok…a respite…tonight’s Finding Your Roots episode was really good.

     

    This was one of the best moments tonight:

     

     

    @HenryLouisGates
    1h1 hour ago
    More
    It is a rarity to uncover a native born African identified in the ancestry of black Americans, which is exactly what we found with @SterlingKBrown. Moments like this are why we do #FindingYourRoots!
    https://twitter.com/HenryLouisGates/status/1214728277731889153

     

    Only 5th great grandparent in, “Birthplace of father, Africa. Birthplace of mother, Africa”

    Which would make Sterling K Brown ancestors “recent Africans” in terms of the slavery trade.  Unlike 99% of African Americans who by the same time as when his ancestors were documented, had already had multiple generations of enslaved ancestors…wow.

     

    Such a great show.  If you’ve never seen it, do yourself a favor and check out some old ep and tune in for new ones on PBS!

  45. 45.

    (((CassandraLeo)))

    January 7, 2020 at 10:13 pm

    @jl: It’s likelier that the Iranians have read any book than that Trump has. Including The Art of the Deal. Maybe especially The Art of the Deal.

  46. 46.

    Adam L Silverman

    January 7, 2020 at 10:16 pm

    @(((CassandraLeo))): Similarly, Rousseau put all the really radical and interesting stuff in his discourses in the footnotes because he figured the Calvinist Masters of Geneva wouldn’t read it and order his execution for heresy.

  47. 47.

    Jim, Foolish Literalist

    January 7, 2020 at 10:19 pm

    Michael Crowley‏Verified account @michaelcrowley 1h1 hour ago
    Fox’s Sean Hannity opens his show saying of Iran: “They’re gonna get hit hard.” “Their three major refineries could soon go up in flames.” “We can report six B-52 bombers are on their way to the region.” This could all be bluster. Or not.

  48. 48.

    Martin

    January 7, 2020 at 10:19 pm

    @lamh36: Was really pleased to see Henry Gates in Watchmen.

  49. 49.

    Kent

    January 7, 2020 at 10:21 pm

    @lamh36: There were an estimated 460,000 Iraqi casualties as a result of Bush’s Iraq war. We didn’t get much reporting about them either.  No sure why you would expect the media to start now.

  50. 50.

    Adam L Silverman

    January 7, 2020 at 10:22 pm

    @Bill Arnold: Enjoy!

  51. 51.

    Adam L Silverman

    January 7, 2020 at 10:22 pm

    @Bill Arnold: You saw my post last night? To answer your question about reading material?

  52. 52.

    Another Scott

    January 7, 2020 at 10:23 pm

    @jl: Indeed!

    Another good one:

    “What Hurts the People There are five things that hurt the people:

    * There are local officials who use public office for personal benefit, taking improper advantage of their authority, holding weapons in one hand and people’s livelihood in the other, corrupting their offices, and bleeding the people.

    * There are cases where serious offenses are given light penalties; there is inequality before the law, and the innocent are subjected to punishment, even execution. Sometimes serious crimes are pardoned, the strong are supported, and the weak are oppressed. Harsh penalties are applied, unjustly torturing people to get at facts.

    * Sometimes there are officials who condone crime and vice, punishing those who protest against this, cutting off the avenues of appeal and hiding the truth, plundering and ruining lives, unjust and arbitrary.

    * Sometimes there are senior officials who repeatedly change department heads so as to monopolize the government administration, favoring their friends and relatives while treating those they dislike with unjust harshness, oppressive in their actions, prejudiced and unruly. They also use taxation to reap profit, enriching themselves and their families by exactions and fraud.

    * Sometimes local officials extensively tailor awards and fines, welfare projects, and general expenditures, arbitrarily determining prices and measures, with the result that people lose their jobs.

    These five things are harmful to the people, and anyone who does any of these should be dismissed from office.”

    ― Sun Tzu, The Art of War: Complete Texts and Commentaries

    Hmmm….

    Very wise dude, that Sun Tzu. Would have voted for conviction in the Senate, no doubt. No wonder Donnie hasn’t read him.

    ;-)

    Cheers,
    Scott.

  53. 53.

    Adam L Silverman

    January 7, 2020 at 10:24 pm

    @Jim, Foolish Literalist: We’ve sent a wing of B52s to Diego Garcia. So that part is accurate.

  54. 54.

    Martin

    January 7, 2020 at 10:27 pm

    @Adam L Silverman: Can’t imagine we wouldn’t have done that regardless of what happened tonight.

  55. 55.

    Barbara

    January 7, 2020 at 10:28 pm

    @Adam L Silverman: I would be way too nervous that I would accidentally spend my life savings.

  56. 56.

    Jay Noble

    January 7, 2020 at 10:28 pm

    The Art of War was recommended reading for an Advertising degree at UNL back in the 80’s. The long time head of the department was a prototype MadMan

  57. 57.

    jl

    January 7, 2020 at 10:28 pm

    ” 6. There is no instance of a country having benefited from prolonged
    warfare. ”

    From The Art of War

    https://www.gutenberg.org/files/132/132-0.txt

  58. 58.

    (((CassandraLeo)))

    January 7, 2020 at 10:30 pm

    @Another Scott: Donald Trump is trying to do as much of all five as he can!

    Ceterum censeo factionem Republicanam esse delendam.

  59. 59.

    Don

    January 7, 2020 at 10:33 pm

    @lamh36: that was a moving moment, I agree.

  60. 60.

    patrick II

    January 7, 2020 at 10:34 pm

    All of this discussion about the real meaning of the “Art of War” isn’t about was makes me think that either the book has an incorrect title or. the word we are translating as “War” in the title has some shaded meaning in the original Chinese.

  61. 61.

    jl

    January 7, 2020 at 10:34 pm

    ” 12. There are five dangerous faults which may affect a general:

    (1) Recklessness, which leads to destruction;

    (2) cowardice, which leads to capture;

    (3) a hasty temper, which can be provoked by insults;

    (4) a delicacy of honor which is sensitive to shame;

    (5) over-solicitude for his men, which exposes him to worry and
    trouble. ”

    So, by Sun Tzu logic, we’ll be lucky if Trump Excellent Iran Adventure avoids a real mess. Trumpsters and GOP don’t have any problem from (5) all by itself. But I saw a line that said you shouldn’t treat them like disposable tools either (though lost where it is now). So, worrisome on all five counts.

  62. 62.

    Butter Emails

    January 7, 2020 at 10:35 pm

    @Adam L Silverman:

    Even in the off chance that Trump orders an attack on the refineries, does Hannity actually believe that the tactics utilized would involve simply sending in the B-52s?

  63. 63.

    Brachiator

    January 7, 2020 at 10:35 pm

    @Adam L Silverman:

    So while I look forward to reading this translation, what is new here is that we have a female translator and commenter, not that we suddenly have a properly contextualized translation.

    I have to admit that I was also a bit skeptical. I take nothing away from the translator, but did not quite believe that this interpretation of the book only became clear in this new translation. I would want to know how Chinese scholars, and military people, viewed the work.

    Apart from this, I am interested in knowing if the translation is lucid, elegant, readable, as well as its interpretative bent.

  64. 64.

    Adam L Silverman

    January 7, 2020 at 10:36 pm

    @Martin: They were repositioned to Diego Garcia over the weekend.

  65. 65.

    Barbara

    January 7, 2020 at 10:37 pm

    @Jay Noble: It drives me mad that any business person could think there is actually some kind of correspondence between war and business.  While working on a dispute between two rather large companies, I happened on an email from one senior muckety muck to another at the other party, asking for an agreement for all the employees in both companies to dial down the animosity because the dispute was only about money.  If your dispute is only about money, you should not be making analogies to military conflict.

  66. 66.

    Kent

    January 7, 2020 at 10:40 pm

    There must be some lesson from Tzun Tzu involved here. Ignore your enemies like they don’t exist

    Elizabeth Warren on The View expertly pitches her wealth tax and explains how she'll pay for universal childcare, $800B into public education, etc. without increasing middle-class taxes. The cherry on top is Liz not even acknowledging Meghan McCain's rude interruption attempts. pic.twitter.com/HKs0HXY7qL— Adam Best (@adamcbest) January 7, 2020

  67. 67.

    Martin

    January 7, 2020 at 10:40 pm

    @Adam L Silverman: My understanding is we do this as a precautionary measure with some regularity. I would take it as ‘these might be more useful over there right now’ rather than ‘let’s go bomb some stuff’.

  68. 68.

    debbie

    January 7, 2020 at 10:40 pm

    @Patricia Kayden: 
    She and her compatriots need a new schtick.

  69. 69.

    Adam L Silverman

    January 7, 2020 at 10:40 pm

    @patrick II: The point is actually to win without fighting. To leverage all other forms of national power to achieve one’s objective other than the use of force. That war is politics with other (military) means to use the Clausewitzian formulation. And to try to constrain the strategist, the general, and the decision-maker (prince, king, emperor, etc) from actually waging war by demonstrating just how damaging it is even to the victor and, therefore, how much better it is to achieve one’s objective by means other than military.  It is very much the ancient Taoist equivalent of:

  70. 70.

    Adam L Silverman

    January 7, 2020 at 10:41 pm

    @jl: Well I don’t think we have to worry about #5 with the President.

  71. 71.

    debbie

    January 7, 2020 at 10:43 pm

    @Jim, Foolish Literalist:
    Trump will never bomb the oil he says he wants to take.

  72. 72.

    Adam L Silverman

    January 7, 2020 at 10:43 pm

    @Butter Emails: We’re not going to attack their refineries. I’m sure Hannity would love for it to happen because he has no actual understanding of the problem set and its complexities, and he thinks that if he says it on air he can get the President to do it, but the reality is it won’t be on the targeting options that the President is presented with. And after the fallout that we’re living through from last week’s inclusion of the extreme outlier targeting option, which I’m convinced was included because Pompeo and Pence pushed for it knowing they’d been pushing the President about it for months an that GEN Milley most likely did NOT know they’d been doing that, GEN Milley is going to go through any military option selection list with a fine tooth comb before it is briefed to the President for his decision.

  73. 73.

    Adam L Silverman

    January 7, 2020 at 10:46 pm

    @Martin: Pretty much.

  74. 74.

    Bill Arnold

    January 7, 2020 at 10:47 pm

    @Adam L Silverman:
    I did not see them, oops. They look good, studying now.

  75. 75.

    Jim, Foolish Literalist

    January 7, 2020 at 10:48 pm

    Shimon Prokupecz‏Verified account@ShimonPro22m22 minutes ago

    raqi security officials are now telling CNN there are no casualties among Iraqi security forces following the attacks on the al-Asad airbase in Anbar province and the attacks in Erbil.

    amazing, and a huge relief– I wonder if the Iranians gave the Iraqi gov’t some kind of heads-up

  76. 76.

    Barbara

    January 7, 2020 at 10:48 pm

    @Kent: The only clips of Meghan McCain I like are the ones where she can’t get a word in edgewise.  Warren is so impressive.

  77. 77.

    Brachiator

    January 7, 2020 at 10:50 pm

    @jl:

    More likely that the Iranians have read The Art of War than Trump has.

    Was it Trump who said something stupid like “Iran has never won a war or lost a negotiation?”

  78. 78.

    zhena gogolia

    January 7, 2020 at 10:50 pm

    @Adam L Silverman:

    I’m about to go to bed so I won’t see your answer until morning, but you have respect for Milley?

  79. 79.

    Jim, Foolish Literalist

    January 7, 2020 at 10:52 pm

    @Barbara: God grant me the self-confidence of a dimwitted trust-fund baby with double membership in the Lucky Sperm Club and actually negative levels of self-awareness.

  80. 80.

    jl

    January 7, 2020 at 10:52 pm

    I hope Trump’s ‘All’s Well’ tweet means that someone marched some central casting generals into his office to tell him the Iran strike with (from what we know so far) little damage and no US casualties means that he won, and won big, the biggest most beautiful foreign policy victory ever.

    Though apparently some Iraqi casualties, which might be a problem in Iraq, and should be to normal people, but not Trumpsters, GOP or US corporate media.

    When this news first broke a commenter in an earlier thread said that such a small strike could really be all there is too it. That thought has been circulating through my mind.I assume some of the competent IC and military leadership are not assuming that this strike is all the retaliation there will be from Iran.

  81. 81.

    zhena gogolia

    January 7, 2020 at 10:53 pm

    @Kent:

    Good clip. Good for her.

  82. 82.

    Another Scott

    January 7, 2020 at 10:56 pm

    The US FAA warned American planes away from the region today.

    Now Al Jazeera is reporting that a Ukrainian plane has crashed near Tehran according to Iranian media (just a headline for now).

    I hope they’re not related…  :-(

    Cheers,

    Scott.

  83. 83.

    geg6

    January 7, 2020 at 10:59 pm

    @Adam L Silverman:
    I was in college in the early 80s, so it goes back at least that far.  He had contrary views about Machiavelli, too. Or at least, contrary to the popular understanding, not the academic understanding.

  84. 84.

    Adam L Silverman

    January 7, 2020 at 10:59 pm

    @zhena gogolia: I don’t know him personally. But one of the now retired general officers I’ve known and worked for for years, and still do consulting for, thinks very, very highly of him.

  85. 85.

    Mnemosyne

    January 7, 2020 at 11:00 pm

    @lamh36:

    I love that show. I still remember when John Legend found out that his family had been at the center of one of the biggest antebellum court cases over Black people being re-stolen back into slavery and he had NO idea.

  86. 86.

    jimmiraybob

    January 7, 2020 at 11:00 pm

    @Adam L Silverman:

    I’m reading Martha Nussbaum’s The Cosmopolitan Tradition (2019) and there’s a section on Hugo Grotius and the development of modern theory of international law and just war.  There seems to be some interesting parallels with The Art of War.  Looks like I’ll have to buy another book.

    Any insight?

  87. 87.

    Mnemosyne

    January 7, 2020 at 11:01 pm

    Also, having a fever of 102 degrees is way less fun than you’d think. Stupid useless flu shot. ?

  88. 88.

    AJ

    January 7, 2020 at 11:03 pm

    @Adam L Silverman: I preferred the Calvinist Masters of Geneva in their electro-funk era.

  89. 89.

    Adam L Silverman

    January 7, 2020 at 11:03 pm

    @jimmiraybob: Grotius is very interesting and worth reading.

  90. 90.

    Adam L Silverman

    January 7, 2020 at 11:04 pm

    @jimmiraybob: By insight, what exactly are you asking?

  91. 91.

    jl

    January 7, 2020 at 11:07 pm

    @AJ: “I preferred the Calvinist Masters of Geneva in their electro-funk era”

    They really took off after they changed their name from the Tower of Dour.

  92. 92.

    Martin

    January 7, 2020 at 11:14 pm

    Not sure if I should go for the Iran Air 655 joke or the Boeing 737 joke here or the Putin owning Trump joke here.

    Ukrainian airliner crashes near Tehran: Iranian media
    Boeing 737 plane was carrying 180 passengers and crew when it crashed shortly after take-off from the Iranian capital.

  93. 93.

    Jim, Foolish Literalist

    January 7, 2020 at 11:14 pm

    not to hang crepe, but…

    this thread makes depressing sense to me

    Yashar Ali  ?‏Verified account @yashar
    2. What makes me nervous is illustrated in the WSJ story. The Iranian government has always operated on its own timeline. If you think Iran lobbing missiles over the border is the kind of revenge they ultimately have in mind, you’re wrong.

    I suspect trump will not be able to resist this “off-ramp”, and within less than twenty-four hours, won’t be able to start declaring victory in increasingly obnoxious ways, especially at his next Sixty Minute Hate, and people in Iran and in their sphere of influence will notice

  94. 94.

    Adam L Silverman

    January 7, 2020 at 11:20 pm

    @Jim, Foolish Literalist: Yep, they have their own timelines. And they will respond based on that, not on what we think is a response. Tonight was the overt, face saving necessity response. It is not the real response.

  95. 95.

    jimmiraybob

    January 7, 2020 at 11:25 pm

    @Adam L Silverman:

    By insight, what exactly are you asking?

    I’m wondering if there’s any crossover from The Art of War to the Stoic school that Nussbaum argues influenced Grotius.

  96. 96.

    Adam L Silverman

    January 7, 2020 at 11:26 pm

    @jimmiraybob: Conceptually yes. I’m not really sure there is an overt connection. I don’t have any information that indicates that Grotius and his contemporaries were reading even translated copies of Sun Tzu. So it may just be parallel development.

  97. 97.

    jimmiraybob

    January 7, 2020 at 11:31 pm

    @Adam L Silverman:

     

    Thanks.

  98. 98.

    PIGL

    January 7, 2020 at 11:35 pm

    @Adam L Silverman: I’ve only ever read that brigadier of marines’ translation.

    Swords are fearful weapons. Those who will not put down Swords will be consumed by them.

    Or words to that effect

  99. 99.

    Frankensteinbeck

    January 7, 2020 at 11:36 pm

    Well, if we’re on ancient literature, I read the Autobiography of Benvenuto Cellini recently, and I have to say, narcissists talked the same in the 1500s as they do today.  I kept expecting the pope to break down crying and thank Benvenuto for all he’s done for Italy, Sir.

    God, what an asshole Benvenuto is.  Unlike Trump, however, he was a magnificent goldsmith and sculptor.  He probably did not actually have a luminous halo, however.

  100. 100.

    Adam L Silverman

    January 7, 2020 at 11:39 pm

    @jimmiraybob: You’re welcome.

  101. 101.

    Adam L Silverman

    January 7, 2020 at 11:43 pm

    @PIGL: I’m pretty sure that is an older and less accurate translation. Though it sounds poetic. There are also (at least) two (I’m not going through the Tao Te Ching at this hour) related teachings in the Tao Te Ching on this. One is “shiny weapons are instruments of ill omen, use them only as a last resort” or some variant thereof depending on who is translating. The other is a bit longer:

    Weapons are inauspicious instruments, not the tools of the enlightened. When there is no choice but to use them, it is best to be calm and free from greed, and not celebrate victory. Those who celebrate victory are bloodthirsty, and the bloodthirsty cannot have their way with the world.

    It may be that the quote you’re remembering from the Brigadier of Marines’ translation is of this latter passage.

  102. 102.

    Jim, Foolish Literalist

    January 7, 2020 at 11:46 pm

    Noah Shachtman‏Verified account@NoahShachtman
    NEW: Rudy Giuliani — hired by Iran’s MEK to get it off the terrorist list — is in Trump’s ear and cheering the recent Iran actions. Soleimani was “directly responsible for killing some of my MEK people,” he told The Beast. “We don’t like him very much.”

    good to know sound stable minds like Rudi and Newton LeRoy have virtual walk-in privileges in the president’s brain

  103. 103.

    PIGL

    January 7, 2020 at 11:56 pm

    @Adam L Silverman: The version I read and studied was the 1982 reissue of Samuel B Griffith’s tanslation of the 13 chapters & commentaries. And yes, the language is somewhat poetic perhaps even orientalist. I enjoyed it enormously at the time.

    ETA: With a forward by Liddell Hart

  104. 104.

    Adam L Silverman

    January 7, 2020 at 11:59 pm

    @PIGL: Liddell Hart for the win!

  105. 105.

    Keithly

    January 8, 2020 at 12:04 am

    @Adam L Silverman: FWIW, Cleary’s is my preferred translation too.  I appreciate the contextualization that his extensive familiarity with a broad corpus of texts brings to his work.

  106. 106.

    Adam L Silverman

    January 8, 2020 at 12:10 am

    @Keithly: That is why I like it too.

  107. 107.

    fedupwithhypocrisy

    January 8, 2020 at 12:38 am

    I thought Sarah Palin was the first woman scholar to translate The Art of War, haha.

  108. 108.

    Frankensteinbeck

    January 8, 2020 at 12:54 am

    @Jim, Foolish Literalist:

    I wonder if Trump will blame Rudy for this mess.  It can’t be his own fault, obviously.

  109. 109.

    Anne Laurie

    January 8, 2020 at 1:58 am

    New Open Thread now at top, if anyone’s been looking for one.

  110. 110.

    Matt McIrvin

    January 8, 2020 at 7:52 am

    @debbie: Trump is a complete fool and I’m not sure any logical extrapolation from things he’s said in the past can be trusted to govern his actions.

  111. 111.

    jimmiraybob

    January 8, 2020 at 12:02 pm

    @Adam L Silverman:

    Just in case this might find it’s way….

    I did some Googling and apparently The Art of War wasn’t introduced to the west until an 18th century Jesuit, Father Amiot, missionary did a translation into French (1872).

    Thanks to Anne Laurie for the intriguing post and Adam and others for their insights.

  112. 112.

    jimmiraybob

    January 8, 2020 at 1:44 pm

    @jimmiraybob: Oops.  Translation date should have been 1772.

Comments are closed.

Primary Sidebar

Political Action

Postcard Writing Information

Recent Comments

  • HumboldtBlue on Late Night Open Thread: Rude Mechanicals (Sep 27, 2023 @ 4:14am)
  • Baud on Late Night Open Thread: Rude Mechanicals (Sep 27, 2023 @ 4:07am)
  • sab on Late Night Open Thread: Rude Mechanicals (Sep 27, 2023 @ 3:58am)
  • NotMax on Late Night Open Thread: Rude Mechanicals (Sep 27, 2023 @ 3:38am)
  • NotMax on Late Night Open Thread: Rude Mechanicals (Sep 27, 2023 @ 3:28am)

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
We All Need A Little Kindness
What Has Biden Done for You Lately?

Balloon Juice Meetups!

All Meetups
Talk of Meetups – Meetup Planning

Fundraising 2023-24

Wis*Dems Supreme Court + SD-8

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Mailing List Signup
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)

Twitter / Spoutible

Balloon Juice (Spoutible)
WaterGirl (Spoutible)
TaMara (Spoutible)
John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
TaMara
David Anderson
Major Major Major Major
ActualCitizensUnited

Join the Fight!

Join the Fight Signup Form
All Join the Fight Posts

Balloon Juice for Ukraine

Donate

Cole & Friends Learn Español

Introductory Post
Cole & Friends Learn Español

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2023 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!