• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

He really is that stupid.

We are aware of all internet traditions.

The line between political reporting and fan fiction continues to blur.

Let’s delete this post and never speak of this again.

We need to vote them all out and restore sane Democratic government.

A thin legal pretext to veneer over their personal religious and political desires.

Teach a man to fish, and he’ll sit in a boat all day drinking beer.

You are either for trump or for democracy. Pick one.

“Just close your eyes and kiss the girl and go where the tilt-a-whirl takes you.” ~OzarkHillbilly

Republican speaker of the house Mike Johnson is the bland and smiling face of evil.

Let there be snark.

You don’t get to peddle hatred on saturday and offer condolences on sunday.

Speaking of republicans, is there a way for a political party to declare intellectual bankruptcy?

Consistently wrong since 2002

Hi god, it’s us. Thanks a heap, you’re having a great week and it’s only Thursday!

The republican speaker is a slippery little devil.

If you cannot answer whether trump lost the 2020 election, you are unfit for office.

Hell hath no fury like a farmer bankrupted.

We will not go back.

Beware of advice from anyone for whom Democrats are “they” and not “we.”

“Facilitate” is an active verb, not a weasel word.

Red lights blinking on democracy’s dashboard

There is no right way to do the wrong thing.

Republicans don’t want a speaker to lead them; they want a hostage.

Mobile Menu

  • Seattle Meet-up Post
  • 2025 Activism
  • Targeted Political Fundraising
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • COVID-19
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • 2025 Activism
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • Targeted Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Anderson On Health Insurance / Virginia’s bill against Silver Spamming

Virginia’s bill against Silver Spamming

by David Anderson|  January 23, 20207:21 am| 5 Comments

This post is in: Anderson On Health Insurance, Meth Laboratories of Democracy

FacebookTweetEmail

Silver-Spamming is the practice of an ACA exchange insurer offering two nearly identical silver plans as the cheapest plan and the second cheapest silver plan. This strategy compresses the silver spread between the benchmark and cheapest silver.  Smaller spreads reduce the affordability margin between the cheapest plan available to the benchmark plan when compared to a counterfactual universe where the benchmark silver plan is significantly higher.  This higher benchmark could be because of monopolist pricing strategies designed to maximize enrollment or the benchmark being offered by a second insurer.  Silver-spamming is bad for subsidized enrollees as it raises relative prices of all plans except for the benchmark plan. Silver spamming as a strategy is a choice by the low cost insurer to accept a larger proportion of a smaller and sicker enrolled population.

#silvergap helps consumers by leaving a really cheap silver plan, #silverspam clusters similar plans at lower end, hosing consumers https://t.co/g4gpw8OZfm

— Patrick O’Mahen (@PatrickOMahen) October 25, 2016

Virginia has a bill that seeks to make Silver Spamming less plausible as an actual strategy:

“Narrow network plan” means a silver-level plan offered on the exchange that includes fewer than 20 percent of the health care providers in the geographic region in which such plan is offered as in-network providers.

“Silver-level plan” has the same meaning as provided in 1302(d) of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, P.L. 111-148, as amended.

B. No health carrier that offers a narrow network plan in a geographic region shall offer any additional narrow network plan in the same geographic area if any two narrow network plans offered by such health carrier in the geographic region would have the two lowest monthly premiums of any silver-level plans offered by the health carrier in the geographic region.

A very narrow network insurer can offer multiple silver plans in a given region. An insurer can offer a broad network and a very narrow network. That broad network can have a dozen different plans layered on top of it. The theory is that when all else is equal, a narrow network will be lower premium than a network with more providers.

I think that a 20% of available providers definition of a “narrow network” is a very low bar to clear as a network. Important work by Weiner and Polsky from 2015 applied a “T-shirt” size system to networks. They defined a Medium network at 40% of available providers. Applying a “medium” threshold to this law would make it much harder for an insurer to offer a 15% of local provider network and a 21% local provider network that would just clear the requirement to effectively silver spam the region. An insurer could still offer a 15% network and a 41% network but the premium spread is far more likely to be significant due to the broader network.

States have significant capability to shape their individual marketplaces to be more or less friendly to buyers. States can find ways to manage spreads and product quality to achieve local goals. Higher benchmark premiums can and often will lead to greater affordability for buyers.

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « Thursday Morning Open Thread
Next Post: Respite Open Thread: As Promised Pups, Kitties and Random Things Respite Open Thread: As Promised Pups, Kitties and Random Things 3»

Reader Interactions

5Comments

  1. 1.

    Butch

    January 23, 2020 at 8:30 am

    So, David, not on topic but I don’t know who else to ask.  We went in for a checkup in January 2019; Blue Cross denied payment so I paid the amount in full, and then started getting bills every two weeks – account balance zero, payment due zero, payment must be submitted immediately.  Kind of zen, huh?  Anyway, after many, many phone calls and letters, the clinic finally tells me that there’s an outstanding insurance claim from the visit that we may still have to pay.  Can they actually come at us for $107 more than a year after the visit?

    (I now know from sad experience that the Blue Cross SOP is to deny everything and then sit back and see how you react.  Once you appeal, however, Blue Cross does set an internal deadline of 60 days and sticks to it, so if the clinic had actually done anything to file this claim they’d have an answer by now.  I also discovered that the folks at the state agency supposedly set up to deal with these situations seem to think their job consists of answering the phone and telling you there’s nothing they can do.)

    Thank you – sorry for the long post.

  2. 2.

    Barbara

    January 23, 2020 at 10:24 am

    @Butch: I don’t have enough facts to give you a recitation of your possible legal rights, but you can try telling the clinic that their failure to file in a timely manner means that you now have no recourse with the insurer.  Therefore, you will agree to a payment of $X, X being half or less of the original amount.  If they agree to that, make sure you talk to the billing manager so that it gets internally accounted for as a zero balance.

  3. 3.

    Yutsano

    January 23, 2020 at 11:26 am

    Once again: vvoting matters.

  4. 4.

    p.a.

    January 23, 2020 at 11:58 am

    David, what are the points of contact between insurers, state and fed regulators, and legislatures, particularly in regards to: “well if x happens (at whatev gvt level, by any branch) we may have no recourse but to leave the state/county”? Is this type of pressure usually applied by lobbyists, or more directly by insurers?

  5. 5.

    ProfDamatu

    January 23, 2020 at 1:35 pm

    This is really interesting legislation! I do wonder, though, if it will mostly affect the larger metro regions that have a broader possible network spread (which also tend to have more insurers and more competition to hopefully bring down prices). Still worth doing, though it will end up leaving out lots of the places where silver spamming is really hosing consumers.

    I’m thinking in particular of small cities like Charlottesville and Harrisonburg, where it’s going to be very difficult to offer a network so narrow that it would trigger this law. In a city of 50,000, a network that included only 20% of the providers would be so narrow as to be completely non-functional; I could see a network like that ending up with fewer than 10 primary care docs, for instance. I guess my town is a special case, in that a good chunk of the doctors and almost all of the facilities in the area are owned by the same corporation as one of the two insurers offering plans in the area. That insurer would find it impossible to offer a network narrow enough to trigger that law because it wouldn’t make any kind of sense to exclude any of that company’s facilities or doctors from the network (and, surprise surprise, that company has been silver spamming – though at least they actually started doing significant silver loading for this year).

    Interestingly, the narrow-network products being offered by one of our insurers this year (Optima) simply exclude most of the UVA facilities and doctors (which are 50 miles away but still close enough to be in our network in the past). Even so, given the concentration of ownership, I’d be surprised to find that even the narrow network included less than half of the providers in the 50-mile radius…just because there aren’t that many, and so many work for the same company.

    (As a side note, our other option – Anthem HealthKeepers – doesn’t bother with separate networks; they just put all of the more expensive UVA providers in a higher tier with breathtakingly high coinsurance, or exclude them altogether.)

Comments are closed.

Primary Sidebar

On The Road - Christopher Mathews - Iceland: Season's Fleeting 3
Image by Christopher Mathews (6/13/25)

PA Supreme Court At Risk

We did it!

We raised the 25,000 for The Civics Center, and with the external matches, that gives them $60,000 for this Spring effort!

You guys rock!

Recent Comments

  • The return of Mo Salad on Late Night Open Threads (Jun 14, 2025 @ 4:34am)
  • 🐾BillinGlendaleCA on Late Night Open Threads (Jun 14, 2025 @ 4:32am)
  • YY_Sima Qian on Late Night Open Threads (Jun 14, 2025 @ 4:30am)
  • YY_Sima Qian on Open Thread: Tracking the Protests (Jun 14, 2025 @ 4:27am)
  • eclare on Late Night Open Threads (Jun 14, 2025 @ 4:10am)

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
War in Ukraine
Donate to Razom for Ukraine

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)
Fix Nyms with Apostrophes

Social Media

Balloon Juice
WaterGirl
TaMara
John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
David Anderson
Major Major Major Major
DougJ NYT Pitchbot
mistermix

Keeping Track

Legal Challenges (Lawfare)
Republicans Fleeing Town Halls (TPM)
21 Letters (to Borrow or Steal)
Search Donations from a Brand

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2025 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!