• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

The next time the wall street journal editorial board speaks the truth will be the first.

It’s a good piece. click on over. but then come back!!

President Musk and Trump are both poorly raised, coddled 8 year old boys.

Every reporter and pundit should have to declare if they ever vacationed with a billionaire.

Never give a known liar the benefit of the doubt.

Innocent people do not delay justice.

Stop using mental illness to avoid talking about armed white supremacy.

Jack Smith: “Why did you start campaigning in the middle of my investigation?!”

A tremendous foreign policy asset… to all of our adversaries.

Fuck these fucking interesting times.

T R E 4 5 O N

We will not go quietly into the night; we will not vanish without a fight.

Dumb motherfuckers cannot understand a consequence that most 4 year olds have fully sorted out.

Trump’s cabinet: like a magic 8 ball that only gives wrong answers.

Democracy cannot function without a free press.

There are consequences to being an arrogant, sullen prick.

Do not shrug your shoulders and accept the normalization of untruths.

When tyranny becomes law, rebellion becomes duty. ~Thomas Jefferson

It may be funny to you motherfucker, but it’s not funny to me.

He really is that stupid.

The Giant Orange Man Baby is having a bad day.

There is no right way to do the wrong thing.

The unpunished coup was a training exercise.

The willow is too close to the house.

Mobile Menu

  • 4 Directions VA 2025 Raffle
  • 2025 Activism
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • 2025 Activism
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • Targeted Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Anderson On Health Insurance / The Catch 22 of ACA Affordability

The Catch 22 of ACA Affordability

by David Anderson|  February 12, 20208:00 am| 6 Comments

This post is in: Anderson On Health Insurance

FacebookTweetEmail

States seeking to reduce their uninsured populations must beware a Catch-22

By David M. Anderson, Charles Gaba, Louise Norris and Andrew Sprung

 

State policymakers have been prolific and creative in putting forward measures to strengthen their ACA marketplaces. Measures enacted since 2017 or in progress now include reinsurance programs, which reduced base premiums by an average of 20% in their first year in the first seven states to implement such programs; new or renewed state-based exchanges, which capture insurance user fees that can be used for advertising and outreach; state premium subsidies to supplement federal subsidies; and state-based individual mandates, which can provide funding for all of the above.

 

Policyholders must recognize, however, that these choices entail tradeoffs — and not just in budgetary constraints. Specifically, built into ACA marketplace architecture is a pricing dynamic that bedevils state attempts to improve ACA marketplace performance: reductions in premiums for unsubsidized enrollees tend to raise premiums for subsidized enrollees. Because premium subsidies are designed so that enrollees pay a fixed percentage of income for the benchmark (second cheapest silver) plan, premium increases also increase subsidies — and tend to increase the difference, or “spread,” between the benchmark plan and cheaper plans.

This dynamic has been intensified by “silver loading,” insurers’ response to President Trump’s October 2017 cutoff of direct federal reimbursement to insurers for the Cost Sharing Reduction (CSR) subsidies they are required to provide to low income marketplace enrollees who select silver plans. Most state insurance departments responded by allowing insurers to price CSR into silver premiums only. As a result, bronze plans are available at zero premium to more than half of subsidized enrollees, and gold plans cheaper than the silver benchmark are available to a substantial minority. Notwithstanding Trump’s avowal, days after the CSR cutoff, that “Obamacare is finished,” silver loading has probably boosted ACA marketplace enrollment by about 500,000.

The negative effect of reductions in unsubsidized premiums, for example via state reinsurance programs, confronts states with a Catch-22: If they take actions that reduce unsubsidized premiums, subsidy amounts will decrease and after-subsidy premiums tend to increase for a substantial number of enrollees. But if states don’t take action to reduce unsubsidized premiums, people with income above 400% of the poverty level are increasingly priced out of the market. Huge premium increases in 2017 and 2018 rendered ACA-compliant plans unaffordable for millions of people who did not qualify for subsides. Unsubsidized enrollment in ACA-compliant plans was halved from 2016 to 2019.  In many states, reinsurance programs have provided substantial relief to the unsubsidized, while sometimes reducing discounts and likely depressing enrollment of the subsidized.

Many of the states with relatively low uninsured rates have sidestepped the Catch-22 by various means. Massachusetts, which leads the nation with a 97% insured population, adds generous state supplements to federal ACA subsidies, rendering discounts from the benchmark unnecessary. Vermont and California also add state subsidies to the federal (California’s state-funded subsidies launched in 2020). Minnesota and New York have exercised an ACA option to create a Basic Health Program for lower income enrollees who would otherwise be in the marketplace, providing Medicaid-like coverage at much lower cost to enrollees with incomes up to 200% of the Federal Poverty Level.  Washington, D.C. expanded Medicaid eligibility to 210% FPL. In these states the uninsured rate ranges from 3 to 7%, compared to 9% for the U.S. as a whole.

 

The most successful interventions to date acknowledge in one way or another that ACA marketplace subsidies are inadequate to the task: too many prospective enrollees find the coverage on offer unaffordable. The Kaiser Family Foundation estimates takeup of marketplace offerings among the subsidy-eligible at below 50%, and takeup among those ineligible for subsidies is lower still. To ease the way for the latter group, California offers limited subsidies to some enrollees with income above the ACA’s 400% FPL eligibility cutoff, and Washington state plans to do so starting next year.

 

Short of putting up their own money to improve subsidies, states looking to improve marketplace affordability might consider taking regulatory action to intensify silver loading effects — effectively increasing federal subsidies. Silver loading is far from reaching its full potential. Thanks to the added value of CSR for low income enrollees, silver plans on average offer more comprehensive coverage than gold plans. Yet gold plans are usually still significantly more expensive. Mandating that insurers price plans in accordance with the real actuarial value, as actuaries Greg Fann and Daniel Cruz have proposed, would provide consistent relief to enrollees with incomes above 200% FPL, who qualify for either negligible CSR or no CSR.

 

Unless and until subsidies are enriched on the federal level by other means, policy makers seeking to increase marketplace affordability nationally should resist efforts in Congress to restore direct federal reimbursement to insurers for CSR. In the absence of federal legislation to improve ACA subsidies, silver loading is a vital resource, enhancing affordability regardless of whatever other measures are taken.

 

State-based subsidy enhancements can be partly funded, ironically, by states picking up the federal ACA taxes that Congress has shed. Several states have instituted individual mandates. A bill introduced in New Mexico would institute a state version of the repealed user fee paid by insurers offering plans on the exchange. This kind of legislative judo may be states’ best tool for wriggling out of the pricing Catch-22.

 

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « Some Observations About Yesterday
Next Post: Amy, Whatcha Gonna Do? »

Reader Interactions

6Comments

  1. 1.

    Brad F

    February 12, 2020 at 10:05 am

    David

    “Mandating that insurers price plans in accordance with the real actuarial value,” would encompass what changes (sorry–link too long)? Does the subsidized silver price go up if its AV “eclipses” gold?

    Brad

  2. 2.

    David Anderson

    February 12, 2020 at 10:42 am

    @Brad F:  Right now, Silver in Silver Switch states are priced at pretty close to Gold levels (~78 to 80% AV) even as the weighed AV of the Silver plans being sold is closer to ~88 to 90% AV.

    Several of us nerds strongly believe that there is a quirk in the risk adjustment transfer formula that is mechanically suppressing silver premiums and bumping up gold premiums through an incorrect application of induced demand/induced utilization factors in the transfer formula.

    Fixing that quirk makes gold systemically cheaper than silver instead of incidentally cheaper than comparable silvers.  That is probably a 2022 or 2023 goal.

  3. 3.

    Duane

    February 12, 2020 at 12:41 pm

    This is a really good explainer of the ACA today. Imagine if all the states would make it work for their citizens, like MA, CA, and a few others are doing, and a federal government that wasn’t actively seeking to destroy it. Might make the heavy lift of M4A unnecessary, and we could move on to other issues.

  4. 4.

    TC

    February 12, 2020 at 8:51 pm

    TLDR.  This post is exhibit A for why the ACA is a failure.  Only the nerds care anymore how if we could only tweak this and incentivize that we might be able to keep all the interests happy and make it work.  Not.  The rest of us know it’s the kind of cluster-fuck Rube Goldberg contraption you get when you have way too much ‘compromise’ creating a bill that should have been M4A from the start

  5. 5.

    David Anderson

    February 13, 2020 at 10:47 am

    @TC: Please tell me how to get to 218 votes in the House,  60 votes in the Senate and 5 on the Supreme Court at any point from 1/21/09 to present for that

    I’ll take a Rube Goldberg-esque kludge that delivers real, meaningful and incremental change rather than an elegant system that is straightforward and simple that can’t get out of committee every day of the week.

  6. 6.

    mardam422

    February 14, 2020 at 12:17 pm

    @TC: Maybe we can all have a puppy that won’t shit on the floor and we can eat ice cream all day every day without getting fat, too?

Comments are closed.

Primary Sidebar

On The Road - dmkingto - SF Bay Area Scenes 7
Image by dmkingto (7/31/25)
Donate

Recent Comments

  • sab on For the Night Shift – Four Directions Native Vote in Virginia (Raffle!) (Jul 16, 2025 @ 4:51am)
  • sab on Covid & Other Plagues Update (Jul 16, 2025 @ 4:29am)
  • Baud on Covid & Other Plagues Update (Jul 16, 2025 @ 4:25am)
  • Baud on Covid & Other Plagues Update (Jul 16, 2025 @ 4:19am)
  • sab on Tuesday Night Open Thread (Jul 16, 2025 @ 4:04am)

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
No Kings Protests June 14 2025

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)
Fix Nyms with Apostrophes

Social Media

Balloon Juice
WaterGirl
TaMara
John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
David Anderson
Major Major Major Major
DougJ NYT Pitchbot
mistermix

Keeping Track

Legal Challenges (Lawfare)
Republicans Fleeing Town Halls (TPM)
21 Letters (to Borrow or Steal)
Search Donations from a Brand

Feeling Defeated?  If We Give Up, It's Game Over

Donate

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2025 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!