• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

Lick the third rail, it tastes like chocolate!

Do not shrug your shoulders and accept the normalization of untruths.

So many bastards, so little time.

We can’t confuse what’s necessary to win elections with the policies that we want to implement when we do.

Republicans choose power over democracy, every day.

Historically it was a little unusual for the president to be an incoherent babbling moron.

A sufficient plurality of insane, greedy people can tank any democratic system ever devised, apparently.

The gop is a fucking disgrace.

“Perhaps I should have considered other options.” (head-desk)

My right to basic bodily autonomy is not on the table. that’s the new deal.

Hell hath no fury like a farmer bankrupted.

Baby steps, because the Republican Party is full of angry babies.

Russian mouthpiece, go fuck yourself.

Teach a man to fish, and he’ll sit in a boat all day drinking beer.

Stop using mental illness to avoid talking about armed white supremacy.

Proof that we need a blogger ethics panel.

The low info voters probably won’t even notice or remember by their next lap around the goldfish bowl.

People really shouldn’t expect the government to help after they watched the GOP drown it in a bathtub.

“Everybody’s entitled to be an idiot.”

If you are still in the gop, you are either an extremist yourself, or in bed with those who are.

There are no moderate republicans – only extremists and cowards.

If you voted for Trump, you don’t get to speak about ethics, morals, or rule of law.

“Can i answer the question? No you can not!”

Perhaps you mistook them for somebody who gives a damn.

Mobile Menu

  • Seattle Meet-up Post
  • 2025 Activism
  • Targeted Political Fundraising
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • COVID-19
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • 2025 Activism
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • Targeted Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Anderson On Health Insurance / Competition and Out of Pocket spreads

Competition and Out of Pocket spreads

by David Anderson|  February 18, 20207:51 am| 7 Comments

This post is in: Anderson On Health Insurance

FacebookTweetEmail

Yesterday, we looked at the variation in the minimal out of pocket limit for Gold plans on Healthcare.gov in 2020.

Very different alloys of Gold are available on Healthcare.gov.

There are low maximum out of pocket gold plans in North Jersey, Arkansas, central Atlantic coast Florida, Kansas, Wisconsin and a couple of other spots where the lowest out of pocket limit for a Gold plan is under $3,500. Structurally, most of the cost-sharing in these plans will be in the form of a deductible and there will be few exemptions from cost-sharing.

On the other hand, most of Texas and Oklahoma as well as big chunks of North Carolina and Virginia only offer Gold plans that have the maximum allowable out of pocket limit. These plans tend to have smaller deductibles and more services that are no cost-sharing.

A colleague of mine asked if there was anything going on with market characteristics. I ran two sets of analysis looking at the difference between the lowest gold out of pocket limit and the lowest bronze out of pocket limit. The first was whether or not a monopoly mattered? The second was a broader question if the number of insurers mattered more than 1 or not 1. I’ve included for this quick and dirty analysis, the benchmark premium for a single forty year old.

Market structures matter.

The Monopoly Analysis:And the non-monopoly, insurer count model is here:

Difference between MOOP Gold and Bronze plans 2020 on Healthcare.gov (Monopoly Analysis)
Coefficients Standard Error t Stat P-value
Intercept -2793.93 107.20 -26.06 0.00
Monopoly 780.20 61.15 12.76 0.00
Benchmark Premium EHB 3.32 0.20 16.88 0.00

Here is the number of insurers analysis:

Difference between MOOP Gold and Bronze plans 2020 on Healthcare.gov (Number of insurers)
Coefficients Standard Error t Stat P-value
Intercept -1630.52 142.86 -11.41 0.00
Insurer Count -324.89 24.05 -13.51 0.00
Benchmark Premium EHB 2.91 0.20 14.24 0.00

In both cases, adding more insurers makes the spread between the lowest gold out of pocket limit and the lowest bronze out of pocket limit increase.  Gold becomes noticeably different than bronze and attractive to different populations when there are more insurers in a county.

A full-on model would be adding in state fixed effects to pull out state wide policy (like in New Jersey and states with standardized plan options) and look at several years worth of data.  But competition is probably related to making Gold plans more pragmatically valuable to individuals with high expected medical costs compared to counties where there is little to no competition.

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « Tuesday Morning Open Thread: Keep Hope Alive
Next Post: Ramsay’s Great-Great Grandson Has a Book »

Reader Interactions

7Comments

  1. 1.

    Jake Gibson

    February 18, 2020 at 8:41 am

    Question about Medicaid rules, though it might not be in your wheelhouse.

    A member of my family has a toddler covered by Medicaid. They have been trying to make an appointment with a dentist. It is hard to find one that will take Medicaid. The family offered to help pay for the appointment with cash upfront, but were told that would be Medicaid fraud. That makes no sense to me. That might only be a rule in Kentucky

    Why would there be such a regulation?

  2. 2.

    David Anderson

    February 18, 2020 at 8:53 am

    @Jake Gibson: Medicaid has weird rules that vary tremendously by state.

    There is nothing that stops a Medicaid beneficiary from paying the cash price for a dental service but there may be regulations that prevent Medicaid from later paying for part of the service(s).

  3. 3.

    TomatoQueen

    February 18, 2020 at 9:49 am

    My son has been covered by Medicaid in Florida, Connecticut, and Virginia. This scenario first arose for him in Florida (orthopedic braces), then in Connecticut (frequently-breaking tube feeding equipment), and more often in Virginia (dental service with anesthesia, orthopedic braces, office visits) because we’ve been here longer. I think calling it Medicaid fraud as such isn’t helpful because nobody is operating from an intention to commit fraud. The bottom line is it’s either/or, and it applies to all services: for covered services, either Medicaid pays for the entire cost, or the patient/guardian does, unlike a real insurance situation where there’s a copay, an insurance payment, and then an amount of zero to whatever. Now when Virginia went to Medicaid with an extra layer of useless bureaucracy (don’t get me started) called Managed Care, our PCP got a mite confused among all the plans, forgot to sign up for a few of them, and during the transition some of our office visits weren’t covered. I’m still paying on these even tho’ it was his office staff’s fault. They don’t chase me for the money and I pay when I remember, and ongoing the boy is covered. At least, it seems that way.

  4. 4.

    Harish Mandyam

    February 18, 2020 at 11:05 am

    I read this article in Washington Monthly:

    https://washingtonmonthly.com/magazine/january-february-march-2020/how-to-end-the-democrats-health-care-demolition-derby/

    The article implies that private insurance companies are extremely bad at negotiating provider prices. But, that seems odd to me. Aren’t insurance companies supposed to have the expertise and bargaining power to negotiate on price?

    And… if this is true, then it shouldn’t apply to HMOs (who have the providers in-house)? But, when I look at exchange prices, I don’t see that much different between Kaiser-style HMOs and regular insurance plans (I might be incorrect on this).

    Since I don’t have a background in health-care economics, I’m curious to see other people’s thoughts on the article.

  5. 5.

    David Anderson

    February 18, 2020 at 12:04 pm

    This is a damn good point — and basically, Kaiser has to pay their in-house staff at rates close enough to market rates (determined by other insurers paying other provider organizations) to keep their employed staff still employed at Kaiser instead of walking across the street and opening up a new office that is contracting with Blue Cross etc.

  6. 6.

    Harish Mandyam

    February 18, 2020 at 1:38 pm

    @David Anderson

    Ok, for people (doctors, nurses, admin, billing personnel, etc.) that makes sense.  What percentage of insurance co. expenses though are attributable to personnel expenses?

  7. 7.

    David Anderson

    February 18, 2020 at 3:23 pm

    @Harish Mandyam:
    Between direct services and pharmacy, that is most of the expenses.

Comments are closed.

Primary Sidebar

Image by MomSense (5/10.25)

Recent Comments

  • WaterGirl on Monday Night Open Thread (May 12, 2025 @ 8:17pm)
  • WaterGirl on Monday Night Open Thread (May 12, 2025 @ 8:16pm)
  • Viva BrisVegas on As Settled as a Fat Wombat in Its Burrow (May 12, 2025 @ 8:15pm)
  • Viva BrisVegas on As Settled as a Fat Wombat in Its Burrow (May 12, 2025 @ 8:11pm)
  • Mathguy on Size matters for science (May 12, 2025 @ 8:09pm)

PA Supreme Court At Risk

Donate

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
War in Ukraine
Donate to Razom for Ukraine

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

Meetups

Upcoming Ohio Meetup May 17
5/11 Post about the May 17 Ohio Meetup

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)
Fix Nyms with Apostrophes

Hands Off! – Denver, San Diego & Austin

Social Media

Balloon Juice
WaterGirl
TaMara
John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
David Anderson
Major Major Major Major
DougJ NYT Pitchbot
mistermix

Keeping Track

Legal Challenges (Lawfare)
Republicans Fleeing Town Halls (TPM)
21 Letters (to Borrow or Steal)
Search Donations from a Brand

PA Supreme Court At Risk

Donate

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2025 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!