• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

It’s the corruption, stupid.

When your entire life is steeped in white supremacy, equality feels like discrimination.

Motto for the House: Flip 5 and lose none.

Second rate reporter says what?

“Jesus paying for the sins of everyone is an insult to those who paid for their own sins.”

Republicans are the party of chaos and catastrophe.

Teach a man to fish, and he’ll sit in a boat all day drinking beer.

Republicans do not pay their debts.

You cannot shame the shameless.

… riddled with inexplicable and elementary errors of law and fact

The GOP is a fucking disgrace.

People are complicated. Love is not.

Consistently wrong since 2002

“Everybody’s entitled to be an idiot.”

Thanks to your bullshit, we are now under siege.

Putin must be throwing ketchup at the walls.

No offense, but this thread hasn’t been about you for quite a while.

Good lord, these people are nuts.

It’s time for the GOP to dust off that post-2012 autopsy, completely ignore it, and light the party on fire again.

But frankly mr. cole, I’ll be happier when you get back to telling us to go fuck ourselves.

fuckem (in honor of the late great efgoldman)

Only Democrats have agency, apparently.

The willow is too close to the house.

Authoritarian republicans are opposed to freedom for the rest of us.

Mobile Menu

  • Winnable House Races
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • Balloon Juice 2023 Pet Calendar (coming soon)
  • COVID-19 Coronavirus
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • War in Ukraine
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • 2021-22 Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Past Elections / 2020 Elections / Election Year Open Thread: Mike Bloomberg – He Sees Things Differently Than Other People…

Election Year Open Thread: Mike Bloomberg – He Sees Things Differently Than Other People…

by Anne Laurie|  February 18, 20204:15 pm| 174 Comments

This post is in: 2020 Elections, C.R.E.A.M., Open Threads

FacebookTweetEmail

Periodic reminder that Bloomberg's big new idea for how to run the government is to turn the East Room (the White House's grand reception hall where JFK lay in repose, the Camp David Accords were signed, and Obama announced the Bin Laden raid) into f***ing Dunder Mifflin. https://t.co/0SUzvNGYnr

— zeddy (@Zeddary) February 17, 2020

“… He sees other people as things.”

Some of you will recognize that line as a paraphrase of Terry Pratchett, concerning a professional assassin whose idea of quiet recreation was working out how to eliminate a fantasy-world Santa Claus by kidnapping the Tooth Fairy.

But maybe we lesser beings can better grasp Technocrat Bloomberg’s vision by imagining that, to him, we are not actually people — just units. There are Competitor units, Customer units, Convenience units (a/k/a ‘women), and (when he is in governing mode) Citizen units.

Many of these (we) Citizen units are inherently sub-optimal — distinguishable by skin color or gender. In his professional capacity as someone who profits from cutting out unnecessary complications, it is surely efficient to remove as many sub-optimal units from the Citizen process as possible (stop & frisk, sexual harrassment), while simultaneously enacting rules that will prevent the slightly less susceptible Citizen units from costly self-destructive habits (soda bans). He doesn’t hate the sub-optimal units… he just hates the inefficiency we introduce to the smooth functioning of the system.

"We need a candidate who doesn't take any money from rich donors and who shares our fetish for ruthlessness and belligerence."

*Another finger on the monkey's paw curls down.*

— DSA Pinkerton Caucus (@agraybee) February 17, 2020

Bloomberg has learned one lesson from Trump, fortune favors the shameless.

— Schooley (@Rschooley) February 17, 2020

Bloomberg doesn’t even have it in him to be condescending, because he doesn’t care about acknowledging the public exists. He doesn’t even really do campaign events. He’s just throws money at staff, bots, ads, any of the things a campaign can have till he drowns our competitors

— Proud Bloomberg Disliker (@MenshevikM) February 14, 2020


Mike Blooomberg is pro-choice and a leading gun control advocate. There was only one party for him to run in.

— Josh Barro (@jbarro) February 16, 2020

Seriously, the dude ran NYC with initiative & decisiveness to execute a very specific personal vision of what it should look like. You all see that it's bad, mostly because that vision was weird & bad, but actually having one dude being able to do that at all is the scary part.

— The Mall Krampus (@cakotz) February 17, 2020

Democrats desperate for a sure bet to beat Trump have been flocking in recent days to a billionaire ex-Republican w/ a history of misogyny and bad policy on race. What voters are missing about Bloomberg v. Trump – and the threat to democracy. My new column https://t.co/zZp8bdyPQs

— Will Bunch ?? (@Will_Bunch) February 11, 2020

Hearing this more and more on the trail. Trump is in the heads of many Dem primary voters (but not all or even a majority). Beating him is all they care about, thus the “Mike will get it done” slogan which is ostensibly about issues but is also about winning. https://t.co/Klg9MtFDdK

— Alex Thompson (@AlxThomp) February 14, 2020

Seems worth noting that 400m dollars has bought him something like a 10% national poll share, which, in an ordinary year, would make him a sad also-ran. The problem is that our field is super divided by sad also-rans like Amy Klobuchar, so he’s competitive https://t.co/jb1yc3pFFE

— Will Stancil (@whstancil) February 18, 2020


(NB: I do not consider Klobuchar a ‘sad also-ran’… especially while Tom Steyer is still buying a slot)

The only reasonable way to view a Trump-Bloomberg election is triage. Trump is wrecking institutions that make any approximation of democracy possible. A billionaire buying the presidency makes the problem worse, not better. Question is who makes things the worst. Hint: it’s 45.

— jelani cobb (@jelani9) February 16, 2020

The real danger of Bloomberg becoming president – besides the fact he sucks – is that electing a racist, corrupt, sneering oligarch as president and then using the Democratic Party’s infrastructure to defend him would basically supercharge the American fascist movement

— Proud Bloomberg Disliker (@MenshevikM) February 14, 2020

They’ve already got the racism, the cultishness, and the tactics, the only thing holding the GOP back from going full Nazi is that their economic policies are at odds with white communalism. Bloomberg as president would make the pitch for white communalism very obvious

— Proud Bloomberg Disliker (@MenshevikM) February 14, 2020

It's not hair splitting to note that the same candidate with a different party platform will have very different policy outcomes and no one hurt by them will congratulate you for sitting this out because they're both tyrants.

— Elizabeth Spiers (@espiers) February 18, 2020

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « Pardon our dust
Next Post: The Disappearing Of Elizabeth Warren »

Reader Interactions

174Comments

  1. 1.

    jl

    February 18, 2020 at 4:21 pm

    Bloomberg’s internet ads say he has had many voter ‘interactions’, so there is that.

  2. 2.

    Betty Cracker

    February 18, 2020 at 4:22 pm

    Warren ain’t pulling any punches:

    It’s a shame Mike Bloomberg can buy his way into the debate. But at least now primary voters curious about how each candidate will take on Donald Trump can get a live demonstration of how we each take on an egomaniac billionaire. https://t.co/H02radEZcv

    — Elizabeth Warren (@ewarren) February 18, 2020

  3. 3.

    Another Scott

    February 18, 2020 at 4:22 pm

    ex-Mayor Mike won’t win the nomination if people don’t vote for him. So don’t.

    It’s a shame Mike Bloomberg can buy his way into the debate. But at least now primary voters curious about how each candidate will take on Donald Trump can get a live demonstration of how we each take on an egomaniac billionaire. https://t.co/H02radEZcv— Elizabeth Warren (@ewarren) February 18, 2020

    BC – Jinx!

    Cheers,
    Scott.

  4. 4.

    Major Major Major Major

    February 18, 2020 at 4:24 pm

    In general elections I’m a pretty predictable voter. My priorities are gun control, climate change, urbanism, non-Republican judges (i.e. civil, reproductive, & workers’ rights), and a functional bureaucratic state. Any of the Democratic candidates, sans Tulsi, are acceptable in this framework compared to any Republican. Which is not to say we should give Bloomberg a pass in the primary obviously.

    Also…

    soda bans

    Capping sugar-sweetened drink sizes at 16oz., no limit on how many you can buy, is a ‘soda ban’ in the same way that limiting magazine size is a ‘bullet ban’. (Both policies, incidentally, are recommended by a lot of folks in the public-health space)

  5. 5.

    hells littlest angel

    February 18, 2020 at 4:25 pm

    …  to him, we are not actually people — just units.

    Sadly, given another 20 years of climate change, that will become the consensus among the power class.

  6. 6.

    Kent

    February 18, 2020 at 4:26 pm

    Seriously?   The White House is basically divided up into 3 categories of spaces already:  (1) private quarters for the first family, (2) public and ceremonial spaces  for events, receptions, receiving foreign delegations, etc.  and (3) working space for the White House staff.

    The working spaces within the White House are already a sea of cubicles anyway.  Bloomberg doesn’t have to do anything to create a cubical farm at the White House.  It already exists.  And he isn’t going to sacrifice any of the public or ceremonial spaces for this sort of nonsense because those are needed for public and ceremonial events.  So this is just the urban technocrat version of Buttigieg and Klobuchar’s noting of bringing homespun “heartland” values into the White House.

  7. 7.

    WaterGirl

    February 18, 2020 at 4:26 pm

    @Betty Cracker: @Another Scott:

    It’s so good, we don’t mind seeing it twice.

  8. 8.

    Baud

    February 18, 2020 at 4:28 pm

    I thought the argument with Trump was that he was so rich, he wasn’t corrupt because he didn’t need rich people’s money.

  9. 9.

    WaterGirl

    February 18, 2020 at 4:29 pm

    We are all just voting units to Bloomberg.  Little pieces to be moved around on the board as it suits him.  Ugh.

  10. 10.

    Archon

    February 18, 2020 at 4:30 pm

    Bloomberg needs about 8 things to go exactly right to be President. Biden imploding, Warren not gaining any traction and Sanders having a clear lane to the nomination thus scaring the Democratic establishment were 3 of them.

  11. 11.

    Facebones

    February 18, 2020 at 4:30 pm

    It’s not a mystery why Bloomberg is hitting 19% in polls. He is literally the only candidate out there attacking Trump every day. Instead of taking on Trump, the other candidates are screaming at each other over minor differences in health care plans that will not pass the Senate regardless.

    Some of the online Berners were literally saying “Just wait! Once we have the nomination, all of this smart, funny snark will be laser focused on Trump!” To which I say

    1) you ain’t that smart or funny

    2) literally nothing is stopping you from doing that now rather than tweeting homophobic memes at Pete and snake emojis at Liz

    3) What was stopping you the last 4 years?

  12. 12.

    Baud

    February 18, 2020 at 4:30 pm

    @Betty Cracker:

    Maybe this was fake news, but I thought I read that she pushed for the change in the debate rules that allowed Bloomberg to qualify for the debate (for the noble purpose of preventing him from hiding behind his ads).

  13. 13.

    Major Major Major Major

    February 18, 2020 at 4:30 pm

    Oh, and that open-office picture gives me all sorts of hives, too.

  14. 14.

    Cacti

    February 18, 2020 at 4:31 pm

    @Betty Cracker: The voters likely to be impressed with Warren’s tweets are already voting for Sanders.

  15. 15.

    Archon

    February 18, 2020 at 4:32 pm

    @Cacti:

    Ain’t that the truth…

  16. 16.

    Baud

    February 18, 2020 at 4:33 pm

    I just want you all to know that I consider all of you extremely valuable blog units.

  17. 17.

    eclare

    February 18, 2020 at 4:35 pm

    @Facebones: Yep.  I am seriously considering him.  I’ll watch the debate tomorrow and see how SC goes.  I only have two priorities:  nominate someone other than Bernie and defeat Trump.

    And for people saying that he is buying the presidency, we are in a post Citizens United world.  That ship has sailed.

  18. 18.

    Baud

    February 18, 2020 at 4:36 pm

    The Baud! White House will be managed out of a WeWork.

  19. 19.

    gene108

    February 18, 2020 at 4:37 pm

    So Cabinet Secretaries will now report to work in the East Room of the White House?

    Really not seeing how him sitting in the East Room of the White House, with his direct reports will make for a better or more efficient government.

  20. 20.

    Miss Bianca

    February 18, 2020 at 4:38 pm

    “Look, when I *say* ‘at least Bloomberg would be better than Trump’, what I *mean* is that a pile of flaming dog crap would be better than Trump!”

    Not loving Mike. But I’m not loving any of the geriatric white guys in the race, with the possible exception of Biden. I just hope that people don’t get so freaked out they start voting for Mike in any primary races.

  21. 21.

    Betty Cracker

    February 18, 2020 at 4:38 pm

    @Archon: What are the other 5 things that have to go just right?

  22. 22.

    Cacti

    February 18, 2020 at 4:40 pm

    @eclare: And for people saying that he is buying the presidency, we are in a post Citizens United world.  That ship has sailed.

    Yep. The chance to right that wrong was 2016. But the combined forces of Trump and Bernie were able to defeat the Dem nominee. They’re hoping to do so again.

  23. 23.

    gene108

    February 18, 2020 at 4:41 pm

    @Baud:

    I thought the argument with Trump was that he was so rich, he wasn’t corrupt because he didn’t need rich people’s money.

    I thought that was the argument for Perot, in 1992…

  24. 24.

    eclare

    February 18, 2020 at 4:42 pm

    @Miss Bianca: People, including me, are freaked out.

  25. 25.

    zhena gogolia

    February 18, 2020 at 4:42 pm

    Yeah, I’ve been Bloomberg curious, but this is BAD (the open office plan).

  26. 26.

    Ohio Mom

    February 18, 2020 at 4:43 pm

    Am I to assume that Bloomberg thinks I’m naive enough to think that the work of the federal government rests on a couple of dozen people glued to their computer monitors, isolated from all else, or that he actually thinks that? Because I’m pretty sure that’s not how it works.

  27. 27.

    BroD

    February 18, 2020 at 4:43 pm

    Save the Left–vote Moderate!

  28. 28.

    JPL

    February 18, 2020 at 4:45 pm

    @Archon: Bloomberg is causing Biden to implode.   His support is coming from the moderates and he is clearing a way for Sanders to win the nomination.   As someone who voted for McGovern, let me say that scares the shit out of me.

  29. 29.

    Cacti

    February 18, 2020 at 4:45 pm

    I wonder if Kamala Harris is thinking she bowed out too soon.

  30. 30.

    Baud

    February 18, 2020 at 4:46 pm

    OTOH, the Office was a great show.

     

    @Cacti: Good question

  31. 31.

    eclare

    February 18, 2020 at 4:47 pm

    @Cacti: She was who I originally supported.

  32. 32.

    David Anderson

    February 18, 2020 at 4:47 pm

    Dumb question — wouldn’t the White House security officers (if they actually show up for work in the next 12 months) be throwing massive screams into the void at the security/compartmentalization problems of an open office scheme?

  33. 33.

    JPL

    February 18, 2020 at 4:48 pm

    Not that I believe in conspiracy theories, but what if Wilmar is being paid by repubs to run and Bloomberg is running as the next republican president.

  34. 34.

    trnc

    February 18, 2020 at 4:48 pm

    @Cacti: The voters likely to be impressed with Warren’s tweets are already voting for Sanders.

    Nope.

  35. 35.

    Cacti

    February 18, 2020 at 4:49 pm

    @JPL: Bloomberg is causing Biden to implode.

    Indeed.

    Thus far, the greatest beneficiary of the Bloomberg campaign has been Bernie Sanders.

  36. 36.

    zhena gogolia

    February 18, 2020 at 4:50 pm

    @zhena gogolia:

    Nevertheless, I still prefer him to Sanders, since he has a better chance of winning the GE and he is not a Russian asset.

  37. 37.

    Mnemosyne

    February 18, 2020 at 4:50 pm

    I am very glad that, as a voter in California, I won’t have to vote for Bloomberg unless the rest of y’all fuck up and nominate him.

    I’m still waiting to see how SC and NV go before I make my final decision, but I know I’m still #NeverBernie in the primary.

  38. 38.

    zhena gogolia

    February 18, 2020 at 4:51 pm

    @Cacti:

    Sad, if true. But I think the “HUNTER BIDEN” crap that the MSM picked up on after the impeachment trial probably has played as big a role.

  39. 39.

    danielx

    February 18, 2020 at 4:52 pm

    Bloomberg: another predacious doucherocket billionaire. Just what we need.

  40. 40.

    rivers

    February 18, 2020 at 4:53 pm

    Before I lose my mind over the Bloomberg threat , I’ve decided to see how he performs tomorrow night. Also, I’ll wait to see how people vote on Super Tuesday. I don’t see the point of sounding the fire alarm about how he plans to use the East Room. Surely that’s the least of our worries. (This is not aimed at fellow jackals but at some of the Twitterati listed above.)

  41. 41.

    Mnemosyne

    February 18, 2020 at 4:53 pm

    @zhena gogolia:

    I am so fucking livid about that. We just had an entire fucking impeachment that proved all of the Hunter Biden stuff was bullshit and THE MSM is STILL FUCKING PRETENDING IT’S REAL?!?!

    Jesus fucking Christ.

  42. 42.

    Kraux Pas

    February 18, 2020 at 4:53 pm

    @Betty Cracker: What are the other 5 things that have to go just right wrong?

    There, fixed

     

    @Kent:The working spaces within the White House are already a sea of cubicles anyway.  Bloomberg doesn’t have to do anything to create a cubical farm at the White House.  It already exists.  And he isn’t going to sacrifice any of the public or ceremonial spaces for this sort of nonsense because those are needed for public and ceremonial events.

    But do the voters know that?

  43. 43.

    sdhays

    February 18, 2020 at 4:53 pm

    I’m team broken glass, no matter how much I loathe Bloomberg. But I just don’t think that people have really thought through their assurance that Bloomberg can beat Dump. There are at least as many assumptions about what people will be willing to swallow if he’s the nominee, and we’re not getting a lot of time to work through those ramifications.

    He doesn’t want to be vetted, because the longer Bloomberg is in front of voters, the less they’re going to like him. He’s hoping it will then be too late. I hope the debate highlights this reality, but I don’t have high expectations.

  44. 44.

    Eljai

    February 18, 2020 at 4:54 pm

    @zhena gogolia: The law firm I work for switched to an open plan three years ago and I have not been productive since.

  45. 45.

    Archon

    February 18, 2020 at 4:54 pm

    @Betty Cracker:

    I was being more tongue and cheek then specific about 8 things “going right” for Bloomberg to win, but things couldn’t have gone better for him this past month.

    Bloomberg still has a very, very tight path to the nomination that are gonna require a bunch of other things working out for him. (Biden becoming completely non-viable before Super Tuesday, a Sanders scandal that rocks Democrats belief in his ability to win the general, etc)

  46. 46.

    danielx

    February 18, 2020 at 4:54 pm

    @Baud:

    My day is now complete.

  47. 47.

    gene108

    February 18, 2020 at 4:55 pm

    @David Anderson:

    I am assuming the East Room gets turned int a SCIF.  I don’t see, how else it can be done.

  48. 48.

    topclimber

    February 18, 2020 at 4:55 pm

    @eclare: Maybe because all those Trump ads from Bloomberg, which probably haven’t moved the dial a micron on Trump’s approval ratings, sure have played up the notion of “My God, we can’t do anything the least bit controversial because only by playing it scared can we beat Trump.”

    What selfless billionaire and media mogul might that benefit?

    Nothing is more controversial than running a women in 2020 when President Hillary only beat Trump by 3 million votes and women fueled the 2018 blue wave. Surely we can’t turnaround a few hundred thousand voters in swing states  without someone safe like Mayor Mike(R-Lite).

  49. 49.

    Major Major Major Major

    February 18, 2020 at 4:55 pm

    @zhena gogolia: Iowa is causing Biden to implode. His support looks like it’s going significantly towards Bloomberg. Easy to see on the polling averages, where Biden had a steady ~27% from August until February 4. https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/polls/president-primary-d/national/

  50. 50.

    Cacti

    February 18, 2020 at 5:00 pm

    @Archon: Biden becoming completely non-viable before Super Tuesday,

    Sadly, he seems to be headed in that direction. His support has cratered. And with his fundraising difficulties to date, I have a hard time seeing how he recovers.

  51. 51.

    gene108

    February 18, 2020 at 5:02 pm

    @zhena gogolia:

    The Hunter Biden-Burisma lies have cast a question on Joe’s campaign.  At one point, my mom was thinking Biden’s corrupt. Stay away from Biden.  She’s better informed than most, but isn’t into blogs, so she gets caught up in MSM/NPR framing.

  52. 52.

    Bill Arnold

    February 18, 2020 at 5:02 pm

    Oooh, I get to rant about open plan office layouts. This from 2018 eviscerates the unscientific, unmeasured claims of greater collaboration (and implicitly, higher productivity) in open plan offices, at their worst, fishbowls full of loud talking fish. (At their best, can be OK if there are visual partitions.)
    Open-plan offices drive down face-to-face interactions and increase use of email (Christian Jarrett, 2018/07/05)
    which references the actual experimental study:
    The impact of the ‘open’ workspace on human collaboration (2 July 2018, open access)
    In two intervention-based field studies of corporate headquarters transitioning to more open office spaces, we empirically examined—using digital data from advanced wearable devices and from electronic communication servers—the effect of open office architectures on employees’ face-to-face, email and instant messaging (IM) interaction patterns. Contrary to common belief, the volume of face-to-face interaction decreased significantly (approx. 70%) in both cases, with an associated increase in electronic interaction. In short, rather than prompting increasingly vibrant face-to-face collaboration, open architecture appeared to trigger a natural human response to socially withdraw from officemates and interact instead over email and IM.
    (bold mine) The paper is pretty clear and has a bunch of interesting references.

  53. 53.

    Gravenstone

    February 18, 2020 at 5:05 pm

    @danielx: Just be thankful that Elon Musk isn’t native born…

  54. 54.

    Served

    February 18, 2020 at 5:05 pm

    Supporting Bloomberg right now is like a child running for their safety blanket after hearing thunder in the distance.

    He will be an autocrat, he will reap all of the benefits of unchecked executive power now that Trump has done the historically-noteworthy dirty work of tearing the norms that weren’t codified, and Democrats will have to decide whether or not to tear down our party’s elected leader and hand government back to Republicans in 2022/2024 or take the same Faustian bargain Republicans have gladly lined up to take with Trump

    Sure he’s not Trump, but I will not even consider voting for him unless he somehow wins the primary. The thought will not even be allowed to cross my mind.

  55. 55.

    rp

    February 18, 2020 at 5:07 pm

    I’m starting to freak out about the primaries. To all of those dumping on Bloomberg, what are our options at this point?

    Biden isn’t going to recover.

    Klobuchar is an extreme longshot.

    Buttigieg…maybe, but it’s hard to see him having much appeal in the upcoming states, and I don’t think he’s ready in any event.

    Warren is great, and would be the best President by far, but I just don’t see her catching on. I hope I’m wrong.

    Sanders — god no. I’d much rather have Bloomberg.

    This really, really sucks.

  56. 56.

    catclub

    February 18, 2020 at 5:07 pm

    @Baud: That is the argument. It just ain’t true, is the problem.

  57. 57.

    Cheryl Rofer

    February 18, 2020 at 5:08 pm

    My Nevada friends are saying that anyone who doesn’t get the pronounciation of the name of their state right in the debate will lose.

    The New York vibe of Ne-vah-da is very strong.

    Just saying, fwiw

  58. 58.

    gene108

    February 18, 2020 at 5:08 pm

    @topclimber:

    2016 scarred most of us.

    Hillary had three million more votes, but Trump had 77,000 more in a total of three states, and thus won the Presidency.

    Trump keeps getting worse and worse.

    For a lot of us, beating Trump is the only thing Democratic candidate needs to do.  Everything else is just gravy.

  59. 59.

    Major Major Major Major

    February 18, 2020 at 5:09 pm

    @Bill Arnold: my work has:

    • an un-partitioned open layout
    • no meeting rooms ever available
    • CO2 levels routinely > 1500ppm after about 11:30am, which can make you pretty stupid

    So it’s just great for people with ADD and people who need to use high-order cognitive functions, which I’m going to guess is “most office workers.” And folks wonder why I only show up two days a week.

  60. 60.

    Brachiator

    February 18, 2020 at 5:09 pm

    Bloomberg is a non-entity as far as I am concerned. I know nothing about him and this is deliberate on his part.

    I was listening to a local talk radio show. The host noted that Bloomberg’s people had contacted him and wanted to send a surrogate to talk about Bloomberg. The host replied that he would like to speak to Bloomberg himself. His policy was not to talk to surrogates.  Of course, no booking was made.

    I noted earlier that Bloomberg has never allowed himself to be interviewed by any newspaper’s editorial board.  But he can unleash a ton of ads.

    In one ad, there is a reference about how Bloomberg holds himself accountable for his actions.  Nothing about being accountable to citizens.

    Right now, I have no interest in this guy at all.  None.  Doesn’t matter than he hates Trump.  If he were running for Trump Arch Enemy, I might vote for him.  But I am looking for a president, not another supervillain.

  61. 61.

    Cacti

    February 18, 2020 at 5:10 pm

    @Served: Supporting Bloomberg right now is like a child running for their safety blanket after hearing thunder in the distance.

    So, we just need to have faith that the revolutionary fantasies of the far left will win 270 votes in the EC?

    Hard pass.

  62. 62.

    Another Scott

    February 18, 2020 at 5:11 pm

    I agree that it’s time to freak out.

    The only candidate that can possibly win is someone who has no back story, no paper trail, and knows how to work complicated subjects into pithy slogans.

    It’s clear that the time has come for…

    Baud!

    Who’s with me!!!??!11

    Cheers,
    Scott.

  63. 63.

    schrodingers_cat

    February 18, 2020 at 5:12 pm

    @Cheryl Rofer: So no to the Larry David double?

  64. 64.

    catclub

    February 18, 2020 at 5:13 pm

    @rp: I think Sanders going into the convention with a small delegate lead, but nowhere near a majority, gives Warren or Klobuchar  better chances to get the nom.  I think Bloomberg would have a harder time convincing delegates.  Also kicking a  different billionaire in the nuts might be something democratic delegates would like.

    problem: if you kick too hard he might not support the Democratic candidate as ferociously ( read $wise) as he might otherwise.

  65. 65.

    Major Major Major Major

    February 18, 2020 at 5:15 pm

    @catclub: I think Sanders going into the convention with a small delegate lead, but nowhere near a majority, gives Warren or Klobuchar  better chances to get the nom.

    I’ve recently decided that the candidate who wins the most pledged delegates ought to win the nomination. If that means a Sanders nom, well, it might do the least damage to acquiesce to the will of the voters.

  66. 66.

    Bnad

    February 18, 2020 at 5:16 pm

    @Facebones: 3) What was stopping you the last four years?

    Trump is a close #2 after Bernie for them.  Either one of them gets smashing the establishment done.  The glorious revolution is inevitable; after Trump’s second term it will just be that much more glorious, like jumping into ice water after a sauna.

    They may not be so off about the revolution part; it may actually happen after a few hundred years of increasing fascism, feudalism, and regular people getting ground into the dirt.

  67. 67.

    Kraux Pas

    February 18, 2020 at 5:17 pm

    @Major Major Major Major: Clearly whoever spends the most of their own money should get the nom.

  68. 68.

    Baud

    February 18, 2020 at 5:18 pm

    @Another Scott: I can’t believe we’re finally that desperate.

    Happy Day!

  69. 69.

    Betty Cracker

    February 18, 2020 at 5:18 pm

    @Major Major Major Major: Agree 100%. I hope voters choose wisely.

  70. 70.

    Cacti

    February 18, 2020 at 5:18 pm

    @Major Major Major Major: I’ve recently decided that the candidate who wins the most pledged delegates ought to win the nomination. If that means a Sanders nom, well, it might do the least damage to acquiesce to the will of the voters.

    If that’s the case, why even have a convention?

  71. 71.

    Mnemosyne

    February 18, 2020 at 5:20 pm

    @rp:

    I’m not going to freak out until we hear from Nevada and South Carolina at a minimum. Sorry, but I need to hear from more than 0.001% of the voters before I decide we’re all doomed.

  72. 72.

    Nicole

    February 18, 2020 at 5:20 pm

    As someone who was here in NYC for all 12 years of Bloomberg (note: I never voted for him), I have thoughts, and these thoughts are mostly, FOR FUCK’S SAKE DOES NO ONE REMEMBER THE 12 YEARS OF HIM BEING MAYOR?

    Meaning- he’s not a good politician.  He’s good at buying his way into weak situations. See: switching from Dem to GOP prior to the ’01 mayoral election because no way he could have made it through the NYC Dem primary.  But, when he faces a well-financed opponent, he flounders, because he’s not well-organized and he doesn’t know shit about how to make a persuasive argument.  See: smoking ban in NYC restaurants vs attempted large soda ban.  The restaurant industry is not well financed or well organized and couldn’t put up much of a fight against him, even though numerous news articles at the time pointed out the ban was on shaky legal ground.  So, it went through.  Then, he tried a ban on oversized sodas (as was pointed out upthread, the ban was on SELLING large amounts of soda; not buying large numbers of smaller containers of soda.  You could still drink a gallon of soda at the movies if you wanted; you’d just have to get up to refill your 16 oz cup, which most people won’t bother to do, thus drinking less).  However, the soft drink industry has lots of money and is very well-organized, and ran a barrage of TV ads and blanketed the media and very shortly, Bloomberg was the Nanny Mayor who was trying to tell NYCers what they could eat and drink and because he has negative charisma he couldn’t make the case for his soda ban and it didn’t go through.  He also wasn’t able to get the West Side Stadium built, which he REALLY wanted to do.  He’s not good at getting actual things done that require actual politicking and negotiating.  He also called the NY Transit employees “thugs” for going on strike, even though the majority of NYCers were on their side.  He’s not good at politics.

    Don’t get me started on whatever changed hands to get City Council to vote to allow him to run for a third term (and only him), except it ended Christine Quinn’s political career so I hope whatever she got out of it was worth it to her.  A third term he barely won against an opponent who, as best I could tell, didn’t campaign at all.

    And the GOP is very well-financed, very well organized, and will chew him up like a dog toy.

  73. 73.

    Baud

    February 18, 2020 at 5:21 pm

    @Major Major Major Major:

    I don’t agree.   If Sanders has 48%, then yeah.  But if he has 30% and Pete and Bloomberg have 28%, I don’t see the will of the voters coming into play.  In this case that means Sanders voters abandon us, but I don’t think the outcome is illegitimate if someone else gets more pledged delegates on the second ballot.

  74. 74.

    Dorothy A. Winsor

    February 18, 2020 at 5:21 pm

    @rp:

    My feeling about primaries is that you should just vote for your preferred candidate. That’s what you can control. The rest of it is beyond you.

  75. 75.

    Mnemosyne

    February 18, 2020 at 5:21 pm

    Also, to reiterate something: at this point, all polls are speculative. They’ve already been really far off in both Iowa and New Hampshire, so I honestly don’t know how they can even be relied on this year.

  76. 76.

    Mary G

    February 18, 2020 at 5:21 pm

    @Brachiator: Every old interview with Bloomberg they dig he says something more offensive. I like him less and less as time goes by. I’m surprised he’s debating.

  77. 77.

    stinger

    February 18, 2020 at 5:22 pm

    @Another Scott:

    The only candidate that can possibly win is someone who has no back story, no paper trail, and knows how to work complicated subjects into pithy slogansno pants.

    FTFY

  78. 78.

    sdhays

    February 18, 2020 at 5:25 pm

    @Major Major Major Major: I think that’s a very bad idea. If 70% of voters voted for someone else, the plurality winner should need to work at winning over a majority. One of the things that Bernie has been bad at is reaching out across the coalition, and it’s something a party leader needs to be able to do.

  79. 79.

    eclare

    February 18, 2020 at 5:25 pm

    @topclimber: I am scared.  2016 was gut-wrenching, and yes I am willing to play it safe while hoping every day RBG does not die.  2020 will be nothing compared to 2016 as far as foreign interference and voter suppression.

  80. 80.

    Bill Arnold

    February 18, 2020 at 5:26 pm

    @Kent:

    Bloomberg doesn’t have to do anything to create a cubical farm at the White House.

    Cubical farms are not open plan. Open plan is (typically) no visual partitions at all, no significant audio dampening, all doors including all conference rooms transparent class, no quiet. Most people have their backs to large numbers of people (stress-inducing). The only quiet places are the restrooms. Fishbowl with talking fish. Sometimes the fish are persistently loud.
    Inattentional blindness[1] and and inattentional deafness are important abilities in such an workplace.
    [1] Gorillas in our midst: sustained inattentional blindness for dynamic events

  81. 81.

    David ??Merry Christmas?? Koch

    February 18, 2020 at 5:27 pm

    @rp: Sanders — god no. I’d much rather have Bloomberg.

     

    I just printed it out and stuck it on my bumper.

  82. 82.

    Major Major Major Major

    February 18, 2020 at 5:28 pm

    @Cacti: If that’s the case, why even have a convention?

    Gosh it’s almost like I think the convention setup, much like the electoral college, is an antiquated relic designed to ignore voters, and that this is bad. Also like the electoral college, getting rid of it entirely seems hard, so I support workarounds like “believing that the person with the most delegates should win”

    @sdhays: If 70% of voters voted for someone else, the plurality winner should need to work at winning over a majority.

    This is not how it works in any other election with more than two candidates, sans alternative voting schemes.

  83. 83.

    catclub

    February 18, 2020 at 5:29 pm

    @Mary G: Every old interview with Bloomberg they dig he says something more offensive.

     

    Have you noticed how much the electorate cared about old things dug up on Trump?

    If the question is “what can you do for me today?”  and the answer is “beat trump” a lot of people can ignore the past.

  84. 84.

    Another Scott

    February 18, 2020 at 5:30 pm

    It’s clear that we must vote for a pig-in-a-poke because only he can spend money on TV and FB commercials.

    In just the last two decades, Michael Bloomberg has insulted and undermined virtually every major Democratic constituency. (His 2014 Rick Snyder endorsement seems especially under-discussed) https://t.co/c0Td1ZyPmi pic.twitter.com/n7LjjYwcTf— Eric Levitz (@EricLevitz) February 18, 2020

    Yay! PiaP!! We Must Do It Because The Media Who Gets Paid To Run His Commericals Tell Us To!!!1ONE

    (sigh)

    [eta, from the Tweet] – https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2020/02/the-case-for-michael-bloomberg-democratic-primary-plutocracy.html

    Cheers,
    Scott.

  85. 85.

    Repatriated

    February 18, 2020 at 5:30 pm

    @stinger:

    No shirt, no shoes: no service.

    No pants: no-mination.

  86. 86.

    Baud

    February 18, 2020 at 5:30 pm

    @Major Major Major Major:

    The other problem is that if you implement first past the post in the primary, you shouldn’t have the 15% threshold to qualify for delegates.

  87. 87.

    schrodingers_cat

    February 18, 2020 at 5:31 pm

    @Baud:

    Agreed if he has majority then yes but not if he has 30%.

  88. 88.

    catclub

    February 18, 2020 at 5:32 pm

    @sdhays: I agree.

     

    My take is that the entire job of the convention delegates is to decide who will be the best candidate in the General, if there is no majority coming in.

  89. 89.

    Zelma

    February 18, 2020 at 5:33 pm

    My best friend and I nearly got into a shouting match about Bloomberg!  I’m a retired academic leftie; she’s a semi-retired ex-business person/entrepreneur whose politics are pretty centrist.  She’s as anti-Trump/anti-Republican as you can be.  But she is talking about supporting Bloomberg.  What she wants is someone who can beat Trump.  I want a Democrat who can beat Trump.  There’s a big difference.

    I don’t know anymore who my candidate is!  I think Bernie would be a disaster.  I think he is the one Democrat who could lose to Trump.  I like Warren but I’m worried she subconsciously reminds too many people of Hillary.  Mayor Pete is the same age as my son and my son has more government experience than he does.  (Hey, I’d vote for my son!). Amy is promising; maybe I’ll give her some money.

    I support Biden if only because I hate the fact that Trump’s campaign against him has succeeded.  Plus I think he could have beaten Trump sans the fake Ukraine scandal.

    Given the wealth of candidates we started out with, how the hell did we end in this mess?

  90. 90.

    Miss Bianca

    February 18, 2020 at 5:33 pm

    @eclare: I have come to the conclusion that trying to fight one plutocrat by voting for another may not, in fact, be the best response to freaking out.

  91. 91.

    Baud

    February 18, 2020 at 5:33 pm

    @Major Major Major Major:

    This is not how it works in any other election with more than two candidates, sans alternative voting schemes.

    Which is why you often see either partisan general election ballots or things like run off elections.

  92. 92.

    Cacti

    February 18, 2020 at 5:33 pm

    @Major Major Major Major: Actually, it sounds more like you’ve grown accustomed to the modern convention, which is effectively a coronation event with a pre-determined outcome, long before it ever comes around.

    I get that it’s unsettling that this one might not be.  But if no candidate can get themselves to 50% +1 coming in, they need to show that they can on the convention floor.

  93. 93.

    Mnemosyne

    February 18, 2020 at 5:34 pm

    @Major Major Major Major:

    IIRC, most other elections require a run-off if no candidate breaks 50 percent + 1.

  94. 94.

    A Ghost To Most

    February 18, 2020 at 5:35 pm

    Y’all can chew on this for days,with the accompanying mental stress. I’m too busy to get stressed.

    We crossed a line that can’t be uncrossed. Things I’ve put off need doing now. YMMV.

  95. 95.

    David ??Merry Christmas?? Koch

    February 18, 2020 at 5:35 pm

    @Baud: Yup.  If the moderates have 70% of the delegates, why should they roll over for someone with 30% of the delegates.

    There’s a great 1964 movie “The Best Man”, written by Gore Vidal and starring Henry Fonda.   At the convention, none of the candidates have a majority and after assessing all the distasteful options, Fonda, with the most delegates, decides to withdraw back a compromise candidate.

    Hopefully, for the good of the country, Bloomberg, Biden, and Pete pool their delegates and back an Amy/Harris ticket.  It would be electric.

  96. 96.

    Ksmiami

    February 18, 2020 at 5:35 pm

    @Archon: I would vote for Bloomberg in a heartbeat over Sanders even though my first choice is Biden- I am terrified over how badly that old grifter will destroy the Democratic party

  97. 97.

    Baud

    February 18, 2020 at 5:35 pm

    @Cacti:

    I think the issue gets complicated if, in fact, this year the supers get the choose the winner.  I hope they hold off until the candidates get to try to win over a majority of pledged delegates.

  98. 98.

    eclare

    February 18, 2020 at 5:35 pm

    @Zelma: I agree with everything you wrote.

  99. 99.

    zhena gogolia

    February 18, 2020 at 5:36 pm

    @Zelma:

    Putin working against Biden and for Bernie.

  100. 100.

    Bill Arnold

    February 18, 2020 at 5:37 pm

    @Cheryl Rofer:

    My Nevada friends are saying that anyone who doesn’t get the pronounciation of the name of their state right in the debate will lose.
    The New York vibe of Ne-vah-da is very strong.

    Lose what? The Nevada caucus? FWIW, D.J. Trump got it wrong (and true to form, thought he got it right) in 2016 and still won the presidency.
    Reid schools Trump in ‘Nevada’ pronunciation (David Wright, October 6, 2016)

  101. 101.

    Major Major Major Major

    February 18, 2020 at 5:39 pm

    @Cacti:

    Actually, it sounds more like you’ve grown accustomed to the modern convention, which is effectively a coronation event with a pre-determined outcome, long before it ever comes around.

    Believe it or not, I actually think that the person with the most delegates should win the nomination.

    Have the vote. Count the votes. If you want anything other than FPTP, use an alternative voting scheme.

  102. 102.

    schrodingers_cat

    February 18, 2020 at 5:39 pm

    In the latest NBC poll, BS leads, he is at,

    *Drum roll please*

    27%

  103. 103.

    Baud

    February 18, 2020 at 5:41 pm

    @Major Major Major Major: It’s a scheme.  It wouldn’t be illegitimate. But I don’t think it’s necessary for legitimacy, and it’s not the scheme we have.

  104. 104.

    mrmoshpotato

    February 18, 2020 at 5:43 pm

    @jl: “Hello fellow citizens.  I would like to have an interaction with you.  How about that up and coming Music Band?”

  105. 105.

    Ksmiami

    February 18, 2020 at 5:43 pm

    @Gravenstone: I remain convinced Elon is an alien sent back in time to warn us one final time that AI is a really really bad idea

  106. 106.

    Major Major Major Major

    February 18, 2020 at 5:46 pm

    @Baud: Non-FPTP decision schemes should be done at the ballot level. You want a runoff, have a runoff, count the votes, the winner is the one with the most votes. You want horse-trading, do ranked-choice and have the horse-trading beforehand.

    Why should the convention just be like, a giant caucus? With 700-odd superdelegates thrown in for good measure? It’s dumb, it looks bad, it’s not where the party should be.

  107. 107.

    Cacti

    February 18, 2020 at 5:47 pm

    @Major Major Major Major: Believe it or not, I actually think that the person with the most votes should with the nomination.

    Fascinating, but irrelevant.

  108. 108.

    Brachiator

    February 18, 2020 at 5:48 pm

    @David ??Merry Christmas?? Koch:

    There’s a great 1964 movie “The Best Man”, written by Gore Vidal and starring Henry Fonda.   At the convention, none of the candidates have a majority…

    Dammit, you spoiled the movie! ;)

    Actually, it’s been years since I’ve seen it and I did not remember the story at all. I still remember a film like “Seven Days in May.”

  109. 109.

    KithKanan

    February 18, 2020 at 5:50 pm

    @Major Major Major Major: Electing delegates to a convention who then have to chose a candidate by a majority (instead of plurality) requirement with successive ballots until that’s achieved IS an alternative voting scheme. It’s also the system we have, so I’m not sure why it’s illegitimate (I can understand why people can be convinced it’s illegitimate, but it’s no more inherently illegitimate than the single outcome plurality vote you’re proposing).

  110. 110.

    Major Major Major Major

    February 18, 2020 at 5:51 pm

    @KithKanan: where did I use the word illegitimate?

  111. 111.

    Baud

    February 18, 2020 at 5:51 pm

    @Major Major Major Major:

    You can’t pretend that we have a FPTP system when we don’t.

    In terms of the future, our reforms have been to move past the FPTP system into things like ranked choice voting.  Worthy of discussion, but the delegates this year have no moral obligation to just hand the nomination to the FPTP winner.

  112. 112.

    David ??Merry Christmas?? Koch

    February 18, 2020 at 5:54 pm

    @Brachiator: Fonda’s decency in Mister Roberts, in 12 Angry Men, in Fail Safe, in The Best Man was the forerunner to Tom Hanks’s career.

  113. 113.

    Brachiator

    February 18, 2020 at 5:54 pm

    @Zelma:

    But she is talking about supporting Bloomberg. What she wants is someone who can beat Trump.

    There is absolutely nothing to support the ideas that Bloomberg has any special ability to defeat Trump.  None. Nada. Zilch. And Bloomberg is doing all he can to hide and run from his shitty record and attitudes.

    I thought that Trump was a weird political mistake.  It seems as though the crazy just keeps on coming.

    This notion that plutocrats are coming to save us is ridiculous.

  114. 114.

    Major Major Major Major

    February 18, 2020 at 5:55 pm

    @Baud: I’ve been using the word ‘should’ a lot and I feel like people have decided I wrote ‘must’.

  115. 115.

    Betty Cracker

    February 18, 2020 at 5:56 pm

    I’m no expert on how delegate math works (at all!), but if Sanders wins the lion’s share in delegate-rich states where he’s expected to do well, like California, and runs up a big lead by doing that, I don’t see how he doesn’t win the nomination, unless his support completely collapses in other states and he doesn’t keep racking up 30% or whatever, which doesn’t seem likely.

    I’m not happy about it, so if someone can present an alternative scenario, I’m all ears, but it sure looks like we’re headed that way, unless the polling is way off. Which it may be!

  116. 116.

    TS (the original)

    February 18, 2020 at 5:56 pm

    I hate open plan offices – individual efficiency level drops. Whoever dreamed it up simply assumed people won’t work if they are not under constant supervision.

  117. 117.

    trnc

    February 18, 2020 at 5:57 pm

    @Bill Arnold: Oooh, I get to rant about open plan office layouts. This from 2018 eviscerates the unscientific, unmeasured claims of greater collaboration (and implicitly, higher productivity) in open plan offices, at their worst, fishbowls full of loud talking fish.

    It’s funny that someone did a study of the effect on collaboration, because I seriously doubt that paper thin claim gets anywhere close to the real reason – saving money on construction and being able to pack more people in the space.

    Having said that, I moved from a large, nicely spaced office to a cube when our old office building scheduled to be demolished. It hasn’t been as bad as I expected, but I’m able to tune noise out pretty easily, plus the space has low level white noise.

  118. 118.

    schrodingers_cat

    February 18, 2020 at 5:58 pm

    @Baud:  I am not eager to hand over power to people who doxx women, tweet guillotines. Can you imagine what they would do if he becomes President.

  119. 119.

    Baud

    February 18, 2020 at 5:58 pm

    @Betty Cracker:

    I don’t know what stops it unless other candidates start dropping out of the race.

    From what I can tell, 1988 and 1992 primaries were also kind of messy early on.

  120. 120.

    mrmoshpotato

    February 18, 2020 at 5:58 pm

    @David Anderson: But open office plans promote workplace comradery and (barfs offscreen).

  121. 121.

    Brachiator

    February 18, 2020 at 6:00 pm

    @David ??Merry Christmas?? Koch:

    Fonda’s decency in Mister Roberts, in 12 Angry Men, in Fail Safe, in The Best Man was the forerunner to Tom Hanks’s career.

    Yep. But in The Grapes of Wrath, Fonda also suggested a hardness and anger that I don’t think I have seen in a Tom Hanks performance.

  122. 122.

    schrodingers_cat

    February 18, 2020 at 6:00 pm

    @Betty Cracker: The race is in flux. Polling is fluid. Also BS has under performed relative to his polling both in Iowa and NH. The MSM is trying to set the narrative that BS is inevitable with little evidence to support it.

  123. 123.

    Baud

    February 18, 2020 at 6:01 pm

    @schrodingers_cat:

    It won’t be worse than what we have now, although it may feel worse because it’ll be coming from inside the house.

  124. 124.

    Kent

    February 18, 2020 at 6:02 pm

    The 1880 Republican National Convention went to the 36th ballot until they finally nominated James Garfield over Ulysses S. Grant and James Baine.  He came into the convention with no delegates at all.  Garfield and Blaine were first and second after the first ballot:  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1880_Republican_National_Convention

    We will get a nominee out of this process.  That much is guaranteed.  But I see no reason to hand it to Sanders if he walks in with a plurality of say 28%.  That’s what the convention is for.  He will need to build a coalition and earn the votes of all the other delegates.  That’s politics.  And if they prefer Warren or Klobuchar or Bloomberg, I can live with what.

  125. 125.

    Raven Onthill

    February 18, 2020 at 6:03 pm

    And we have this. Published in The Intercept, so take with grain of salt. But the author is reputable, and there is risk to publishing this story, so it is probably true.
    Trump:Russia = Bloomberg:China?

    My story shows the lengths that the Bloomberg machine will go to in order to avoid offending Beijing. Bloomberg’s company, Bloomberg LP, is so dependent on the vast China market for its business that its lawyers threatened to devastate my family financially if I didn’t sign an NDA silencing me about how Bloomberg News killed a story critical of Chinese Communist Party leaders. – https://theintercept.com/2020/02/18/mike-bloomberg-lp-nda-china/

  126. 126.

    dogwood

    February 18, 2020 at 6:03 pm

    This has been a depressing primary season.  The Democrats looked at what the Republicans did in 2016 and doubled down on their “winning” strategy.  They had 14 candidates; we started with 20.  That’s an open invitation for someone like Bloomberg to parachute in.  2008 was actually a good season on both sides of the aisle.  Maybe 8 candidates threw their hat into the ring on each side.  Very manageable for the candidates, voters and even the lousy press.  This year it took 2 nights to introduce the Democrats at the first “debate” and the stage was overcrowded both nights.

  127. 127.

    Fleeting Expletive

    February 18, 2020 at 6:04 pm

    Dear mods, how about throwing up an ActBlue link for our respective preferred presidential candidates tonight?  I think today is another $$ deadline for their campaigns, but the pace of news is dizzying and I forgot the details.  THanks.

  128. 128.

    schrodingers_cat

    February 18, 2020 at 6:04 pm

    @Baud: Well it will be worse because Ds are one hope we have against R misrule and their Russian friends. A D party with BS at the head will mean that our politics will oscillate between  2 unworkable extremes.

  129. 129.

    Baud

    February 18, 2020 at 6:04 pm

    @Kent:

    He came into the convention with no delegates at all.

    There it is.

  130. 130.

    Kent

    February 18, 2020 at 6:05 pm

    @TS (the original):I hate open plan offices – individual efficiency level drops. Whoever dreamed it up simply assumed people won’t work if they are not under constant supervision.

    Do you want a staff that will only work if supervised?  Or do you want a staff that will work without supervision.  You get what you plan for.

  131. 131.

    Baud

    February 18, 2020 at 6:06 pm

    @schrodingers_cat:

    We won’t be extreme.  We will be severely divided to the point of an actual schism.

  132. 132.

    schrodingers_cat

    February 18, 2020 at 6:07 pm

    @Baud: BS minions are talking  about rounding everyone up who doesn’t agree with them in Central Park. They call themselves Jacobins, They seem pretty blood thirsty to me.

    ETA: I know they will say that these rhetorical excesses are “jokes”

  133. 133.

    Brachiator

    February 18, 2020 at 6:08 pm

    @schrodingers_cat:

    In the latest NBC poll, BS leads, he is at,

    *Drum roll please*

    27%

    Is this a national poll?  Or just Nevada?

  134. 134.

    Baud

    February 18, 2020 at 6:08 pm

    @schrodingers_cat:

    But they are puny in numbers.

  135. 135.

    debbie

    February 18, 2020 at 6:09 pm

    @TS (the original):

    I work in an open office, and it sucks. As hard as I try to concentrate, if something is in the corner of my eye, I’m going to look up. Headphones help a little with all the conversations going on around me, but still…

  136. 136.

    schrodingers_cat

    February 18, 2020 at 6:10 pm

    @Baud: Look at the people BS has running his campaign they will be the ones running his administration too. But you are right.  He won’t win most likely we will probably lose the House and the Senate. And we will still be stuck withe the Orange King,

    Putin must be laughing.

    https://twitter.com/regwag2003/status/1229903909357047808/photo/1

    Screenshot of a BS supporter making Neera Tanden a death threat.

  137. 137.

    cckids

    February 18, 2020 at 6:11 pm

    @Cheryl Rofer:

     

    My Nevada friends are saying that anyone who doesn’t get the pronounciation of the name of their state right in the debate will lose.

    In 2016, Trump not only got it wrong, he gave the crowd a little rant about how people told him how important it was, and how right he was. Didn’t matter a damn bit (nor should it, no matter how aggravating Ne vaaah-da is)

  138. 138.

    schrodingers_cat

    February 18, 2020 at 6:12 pm

    @Brachiator: National poll I believe,

  139. 139.

    Archon

    February 18, 2020 at 6:13 pm

    @Kent:

    Like it or not, if Sanders goes into the convention with the most delegates and a plurality of votes (even if it’s 30 percent) he is going to be the nominee.

  140. 140.

    Baud

    February 18, 2020 at 6:13 pm

    @schrodingers_cat:

    C’mon, cat. You’re one of the strongest people here when it comes to handling Trump.  Neither Bernie nor his Bros are going to amount to anything more than immense frustration.

  141. 141.

    TS (the original)

    February 18, 2020 at 6:14 pm

    @Eljai:  Didn’t see your post before I posted on how much I hate open office plans – and I agree it is the most inefficient way for people to work.

  142. 142.

    A Ghost To Most

    February 18, 2020 at 6:14 pm

    For those of you that don’t have a Daily Beast sub:

    Trump was sending Roger the second message in two weeks. The first message was, of course, when Attorney General Heavy B stepped in with the courts in a clumsy and ultimately counterproductive attempt to reduce Stone’s sentence from seven to nine years to something still punitive, but more reasonable, like forcing Stone to wear a poly-cotton blend golf shirt from Walmart. The Barr operation blew up spectacularly, as so many of the Keystone Krime Family’s plays do.

    No, today, Trump was trying to tell Stone (and Manafort, Gates, Flynn, et al), and the inevitable chain of aspirational pre-indicted scumbags dragging behind his garbage-barge presidency that if you keep quiet, you’ll be okay. Keep your vow of Orangemerta and he’ll either pardon you or commute your sentence. This was also a message to future campaign staffers, Cabinet members, and everyone else in his orbit that as long as they’re kicking their piece of the vig up to the boss and keeping their mouth shut, they’re good.

    It’s good to be the king.

     

    Rick Wilson is my spirit animal.

  143. 143.

    Another Scott

    February 18, 2020 at 6:15 pm

    @Baud:

    Relatedly, from the NYMag Intelligencer piece by Eric Levitz linked above:

    […]

    This is the honest case for Michael Bloomberg. It is an argument for Democrats to accept that the best that they can hope for in 2020 is benevolent plutocracy: There is no campaign capable of defeating Trumpism through organizing and reasoned argument, so best to let a billionaire drown it in an ocean of propaganda; there’s no mass movement capable of breaking through D.C.’s gridlock, so let’s see if Lisa Murkowski has a price.

    I can’t tell you that this case is wrong. But I can say that we have little reason to believe that it is right.

    Maybe Bloomberg’s money can bend our political system to his will; or maybe no amount of advertisements can convince Rust Belt swing voters to support a historically uncharismatic candidate who disdains their “gray matter.” Maybe president Bloomberg would use his awesome, unaccountable financial power to get sweeping climate legislation through the Senate; or maybe he’ll use it to gut the social safety net. Maybe casting our lot with our team’s racist, misogynist, instinctually authoritarian billionaire will save our democracy by keeping the ethnonationalist right out of power just long enough for its voting base to die off; or maybe doing so will extinguish the possibility of achieving genuine popular self-rule in the United States, as Bloomberg’s success inspires a series of super-rich imitators until we all become the subjects of Supreme Leader Bezos.

    All we know is that we do not know. And if rallying behind the better of two plutocrats isn’t even guaranteed to “work,” on its own terms — if, to the contrary, there are many reasons to believe it would fail — why on Earth would we make that bet? Why roll the dice on beneficent oligarchy when social democracy looks like (at least) as safe a gamble?

    Two tiny states have voted. We need to (wo)man up and not decide that we’re doomed. Come on people (mainly people who aren’t here) – do we really think that only the plutocrats can be our leaders? Really?? What happens after we elect Bezos???

    I’m still voting for Warren. I’ll worry about the convention in mid-July.

    Cheers,
    Scott.

  144. 144.

    schrodingers_cat

    February 18, 2020 at 6:17 pm

    @Baud: I don’t like their attempted hostile takeover of our party.

  145. 145.

    Brachiator

    February 18, 2020 at 6:18 pm

    @schrodingers_cat:

    National poll I believe,

    I heard a pollster suggest that Sanders has not shown that he can build out beyond his base.  Nevada might be an interesting test.

  146. 146.

    Baud

    February 18, 2020 at 6:20 pm

    @schrodingers_cat:

    Like I said, inside the house feels worse.

    Anywho , if you think he’ll lose to Trump, that’ll be the end of their “takeover” attempt.  And unfortunately of progressive credibility too.

  147. 147.

    rp

    February 18, 2020 at 6:20 pm

    Kamala really needs to jump back in.

  148. 148.

    Brachiator

    February 18, 2020 at 6:20 pm

    @Another Scott:

    I’m still voting for Warren. I’ll worry about the convention in mid-July.

    As good a sentiment as any.

  149. 149.

    schrodingers_cat

    February 18, 2020 at 6:25 pm

    @rp: Can she do that?

  150. 150.

    Mnemosyne

    February 18, 2020 at 6:26 pm

    @Bill Arnold:

    Trump may have “won” the presidency in 2016, but he lost Nevada. They knew him too well to vote for him.

  151. 151.

    schrodingers_cat

    February 18, 2020 at 6:28 pm

    @Baud: True but then we get 4 more years of the lawless Orange King.

    Nothing is set in stone yet, the nomination is still up for grabs.

  152. 152.

    David ??Merry Christmas?? Koch

    February 18, 2020 at 6:31 pm

    @Brachiator:  It’s a caucus. He does well in caucuses. He got 47% in Nevada, last time.

  153. 153.

    Mnemosyne

    February 18, 2020 at 6:38 pm

    @David ??Merry Christmas?? Koch:

    He was supposed to do well in Iowa and couldn’t even get more delegates than Mayor Pete, so … ?‍♀️

  154. 154.

    Betty Cracker

    February 18, 2020 at 6:40 pm

    @Another Scott: That was a really good article. If it comes down to Sanders or Bloomberg, I’ll go with Sanders — significant misgivings and all. But my calculus is different from many folks here. I believe Trump is weak and can be beaten by either.

  155. 155.

    topclimber

    February 18, 2020 at 6:40 pm

    @gene108: Scarred me too. Could not sleep more than 3 hours a night til 2018.

    In a fair election I think any of the candidates, even Bernie, will beat Trump. Some have better odds. Some are more of an improvement than others.

    But beating Trump is not enough. If we don’t advance an agenda that addresses structural defects in our politics, we will have Trump Redux before you know it.

    If like me, you are a Boomer, you have suffered by comparison with the Greatest Generation. Let’s prove our worth (which is more than the media credits us with) by beating the banksters and Fascists like they did.

    Let’s be determined to fight on, with the same lack of guaranteed success that they had in the Depression and WWII.

    Courage!

  156. 156.

    patrick II

    February 18, 2020 at 6:41 pm

    @Brachiator:

    Not to mention “once Upon a Time in the West. “

  157. 157.

    Steeplejack (phone)

    February 18, 2020 at 6:48 pm

    If anybody is watching the CNN town hall tonight in Las Vegas, my old friend from college got a ticket and will be in the audience. Look for the blond retired teacher (female) with the “taupe and white polka dot scarf.” She submitted a question but has no idea whether it will be used, of course.

  158. 158.

    topclimber

    February 18, 2020 at 6:51 pm

    @eclare: What the perspicacious TopClimber wrote, #155.

  159. 159.

    lurkypants

    February 18, 2020 at 6:51 pm

    @Nicole:

    As someone who was here in NYC for all 12 years of Bloomberg (note: I never voted for him), I have thoughts, and these thoughts are mostly, FOR FUCK’S SAKE DOES NO ONE REMEMBER THE 12 YEARS OF HIM BEING MAYOR?

    Yes, yes, a thousand times yes.

    Plus, he’s really fucking pissy when he’s challenged, which is not a good look on TV.  I can see him regretting getting into the debate when Warren and Klobuchar go after him on some of his policies and his recent support for Republican candidates.

    I worked for the NYC Law Department when he became mayor, and I think the only reason we escaped the open-plan office plan was that we’d been displaced by 9/11 and just getting our offices cleaned up and habitable was expensive enough before you started adding in tearing down walls.

  160. 160.

    Betty Cracker

    February 18, 2020 at 6:52 pm

    @Steeplejack (phone): Didn’t know there was a town hall! Will look for the lady in taupe and polka dots!

  161. 161.

    Eljai

    February 18, 2020 at 6:53 pm

    @Archon:

    Like it or not, if Sanders goes into the convention with the most delegates and a plurality of votes (even if it’s 30 percent) he is going to be the nominee.

    That’s not how the rules work.  If we don’t have a nominee who has 50% plus one delegate, we will have a contested convention.  If a candidate can forge a coalition together that gets them there on the first ballot, then that candidate could be the nominee.  If not, we’ll have a brokered convention with a second ballot that includes super delegate votes.

  162. 162.

    topclimber

    February 18, 2020 at 6:59 pm

    @Major Major Major Major: When delegates are awarded through primaries and caucuses rather than via party bosses, a convention is representative of people’s desires. No more Boss Tweed. Far fewer super delegates.

    I see no more reason to respect a plurality of 30% in favor of one candidate than the 70% who are not reconciled to him.

  163. 163.

    Brachiator

    February 18, 2020 at 7:05 pm

    @David ??Merry Christmas?? Koch:

    It’s a caucus. He does well in caucuses. He got 47% in Nevada, last time.

    Clinton still beat him. And here is a tidbit from 2016.

    Clinton had campaigned heavily in the state, airing an ad in which she comforted a young Latinx girl who was worried her parents would be deported. Clinton’s message appeared to resonate with Hispanic and African American voters, with Clinton winning by large margins in many diverse neighborhoods in populous Clark County, especially in caucuses in Las Vegas.

    Even before we get to South Carolina, Sanders needs to show that he is expanding beyond his old base.

  164. 164.

    David ??Merry Christmas?? Koch

    February 18, 2020 at 7:12 pm

    @Mnemosyne: in 2016, he was 13-2 in caucuses and 9 -26 in primaries.

    there was a pattern.

  165. 165.

    CliosFanBoy

    February 18, 2020 at 7:16 pm

    @hells littlest angel: calorie units at that

  166. 166.

    HarryBee

    February 18, 2020 at 7:16 pm

    God save us from the damned CEOs. I call them the Make-It-So CEOs. They are natural autocrats, steeped in the belief that instantaneous obedience is their just due. Of all the bad ideas foisted on us by the right, one of the worst is the notion that the country should be run like a business by a businessman.

    Bloomberg’s tenure as mayor was shaped by his invincible certainty that his every decision and idea were the right ones. They say he’s “data-driven.” That just means he has zero idea of how people feel, think, or live, and couldn’t care less if it gets in the way of what he wants.

    If Bloomberg is the nominee, voters will have the choice between Napoleon and Attila the Hun.

  167. 167.

    CliosFanBoy

    February 18, 2020 at 7:18 pm

    @David Anderson: not to mention the intel community doing the daily briefings.

  168. 168.

    Elizabelle

    February 18, 2020 at 7:37 pm

    @Another Scott: 

    Applause, applause.

  169. 169.

    prostratedragon

    February 18, 2020 at 7:47 pm

    A line I recently heard in a mystery play:

    I didn’t “do nothing,” Leo. I ignored it. That’s “something.”

    The primaries are the best chance to do something positive, and stay away from the temptation of doing nothing.

  170. 170.

    Bill Arnold

    February 18, 2020 at 7:49 pm

    @HarryBee:

    They say he’s “data-driven.” That just means he has zero idea of how people feel, think, or live, and couldn’t care less if it gets in the way of what he wants.

    Seen recently:

    During my research I interviewed a guy who said he was a libertarian until he did MDMA and realized that other people have feelings, and that was pretty much the best summary of libertarianism I've ever heard— Hilary Agro ? (@hilaryagro) February 16, 2020

  171. 171.

    hitchhiker

    February 18, 2020 at 8:58 pm

    All I can say is, this is a hell of a time for me to be voting in a meaningful primary for the first time ever.

    Here in WA we’ve always had caucuses in mid-May when it didn’t matter, but not this year. This year we get a primary right after super Tuesday. Like most of you I’m holding my cards to see what happens. The only thing I know for sure is that Sanders would be a historically bad general election candidate — and I was there when McGovern got clobbered.

    I know this because every day of the week I see places like Breitbart promoting him & suggesting that the Dem establishment is trying to sabotage him. He’s trump’s chosen candidate for a reason.

  172. 172.

    sdhays

    February 18, 2020 at 9:34 pm

    @Major Major Major Major: Yeah, and that’s how we get atrocities like Paul LePage in Maine, Jesse Ventura in Minnesota, and Donald Trump in 2016 Republican Primaries (the winner-take-all rules in many states gave Trump a commanding lead even with mediocre wins). Just because it’s familiar doesn’t make it good.

    The point of the nominating process isn’t to deliver a prize to someone, it’s to find the person that best unifies the party going into the general election. Doing it all at the convention if no one breaks away from the pack is messy and inefficient, but so is doing it all state by state. I don’t think the Republican process in 2016 is something worthy of copying.

  173. 173.

    J R in WV

    February 18, 2020 at 9:47 pm

    @Major Major Major Major:

     

    • CO2 levels routinely > 1500ppm after about 11:30am, which can make you pretty stupid

    Isn’t that a health hazard? Can’t the great liberal city of New York send in a health inspector to test the air, and make them fix the indoor/outdoor air circulation? No union, huh!

  174. 174.

    OGLiberal

    February 19, 2020 at 5:18 pm

    @Bill Arnold: And yet this is exactly what my company is doing in our HQ move from NYC to Nashville. Our building in Nashville is currently under construction so the staff there currently – and there are quite a bit – are in a WeWorks space. They are shoulder-to-should, back-to-back, face-to-face. Noise levels can get so loud that if one person has to participate in a call with folks in NYC, he/she will get a conference room to get away from the commotion.

    I know this is kind of WeWorks MO but word is the floor plan in our own, soon to be completed space is going to be pretty much the same. And they are also severely limiting the work-from-home option, even if it’s just one day per week. (can work from home if you have a doctor’s appt or a contractor coming but not as a weekly thing – much more flexible policy in NYC)

    My guess is this will last no more than 2-years. Then you’ll see senior managers move from the floor to offices converted from previously meeting room space. Then they’ll build a few more offices for middle managers. Then the cube walls will go up and it will look like our current space in NYC.

    But will still be cheaper, which is why we’re moving.

Comments are closed.

Primary Sidebar

Fundraising 2023-24

Wis*Dems Supreme Court + SD-8

Recent Comments

  • Kosh III on Cake Watch: Day 1 (Mar 28, 2023 @ 10:38am)
  • narya on American Has Turned Upside Down (Mar 28, 2023 @ 10:33am)
  • Jackie on American Has Turned Upside Down (Mar 28, 2023 @ 10:33am)
  • Juju on American Has Turned Upside Down (Mar 28, 2023 @ 10:24am)
  • Spanish Moss on Squishable Early Morning Open Thread (Mar 28, 2023 @ 10:23am)

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
We All Need A Little Kindness
Classified Documents: A Primer
State & Local Elections Discussion

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Mailing List Signup
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)

Twitter / Spoutible

Balloon Juice (Spoutible)
WaterGirl (Spoutible)
TaMara (Spoutible)
John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
TaMara
David Anderson
Major Major Major Major
ActualCitizensUnited

Join the Fight!

Join the Fight Signup Form
All Join the Fight Posts

Balloon Juice Events

5/14  The Apocalypse
5/20  Home Away from Home
5/29  We’re Back, Baby
7/21  Merging!

Balloon Juice for Ukraine

Donate

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2023 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!