• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

Is it irresponsible to speculate? It is irresponsible not to.

Weird. Rome has an American Pope and America has a Russian President.

There are consequences to being an arrogant, sullen prick.

Republicans are radicals, not conservatives.

Shut up, hissy kitty!

“Everybody’s entitled to be an idiot.”

Thanks to your bullshit, we are now under siege.

Mediocre white men think RFK Jr’s pathetic midlife crisis is inspirational. The bar is set so low for them, it’s subterranean.

Not so fun when the rabbit gets the gun, is it?

They are lying in pursuit of an agenda.

Pessimism assures that nothing of any importance will change.

SCOTUS: It’s not “bribery” unless it comes from the Bribery region of France. Otherwise, it’s merely “sparkling malfeasance”.

Giving in to doom is how authoritarians win.

Wow, you are pre-disappointed. How surprising.

The cruelty is the point; the law be damned.

We will not go quietly into the night; we will not vanish without a fight.

Hot air and ill-informed banter

America is going up in flames. The NYTimes fawns over MAGA celebrities. No longer a real newspaper.

We need to vote them all out and restore sane Democratic government.

You’re just a puppy masquerading as an old coot.

Let’s bury these fuckers at the polls 2 years from now.

Oppose, oppose, oppose. do not congratulate. this is not business as usual.

I like political parties that aren’t owned by foreign adversaries.

Cancel the cowardly Times and Post and set up an equivalent monthly donation to ProPublica.

Mobile Menu

  • Seattle Meet-up Post
  • 2025 Activism
  • Targeted Political Fundraising
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • COVID-19
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • 2025 Activism
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • Targeted Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Anderson On Health Insurance / ACA negative premium plans, SEPS and MLR rebates

ACA negative premium plans, SEPS and MLR rebates

by David Anderson|  April 13, 20208:30 am| 3 Comments

This post is in: Anderson On Health Insurance, COVID-19

FacebookTweetEmail

UPDATE 4/14/20 I am making significant updates in Italics to clarify timing

Individuals who are losing their employer sponsored insurance and qualify for ACA subsidies through a Special Enrollment Period have always had a decent chance of qualifying for a zero premium plan if their incomes are low enough, families big enough and everyone is old enough.  However there is also a chance that many individuals who lost their insurance could get a negative premium plan.  People could get paid to buy ACA plans but they would not see the check until the Fall of 2021.

The Medical Loss Ratio (MLR) requirement is that insurers must spend at least 80% of qualified premiums on claims.  If they don’t do this over a three year rolling period, the insurer has to pay back the increment between what the actually paid out in claims and the minimum allowable pay-out.  Rebate checks for the preceding three years are calculated in the summer of the following year with rebates going out the door in September.   We looked at this last September 2019.

The 2016-2018 MLR period has one year where premiums were significantly below claims and running costs in 2016, a year where the insurers priced things about right in 2017 and a year where insurers significantly overpriced in 2018. Depending on the insurer, the underpricing in 2016 could reasonably cancel out the overpricing in 2018. The 2017-2019 MLR period has one year priced right and two years overpriced. This will produce larger MLR rebates in Fall 2020. The 2018-2020 MLR rebate period also has two overpriced years and one year that may be priced about right.

 

 

 

MLR Rebate Assumptions September 2019

 

Rebate checks are issued to policy holders of the pay-out last calcuation year. The size of the check is a the proportion of gross premiums that their policy is worth for the current year times the overall rebate pool. An individual who qualifies and buys a $10 a month net premium Bronze plan with a $500 month premium gets the same MLR rebate as an unsubsidized individual buying that same policy for $500 per month net. Given these mechanics, it is quite plausible for subsidized buyers who purchased low or no net premium plans to actually purchase negative premium plans by the end of the rebate cycle. This most likely happened in 2019.

A little birdie told me recently that the entire Medical Loss Ratio (MLR) rebate that will be paid out in September 2020 for the 2017 to 2019 plan years will be massive and likely to be almost an order of magnitude greater than it was in 2019. Many people will be in the position to be effectively paid to have purchased insurance in 2020 2019. Individuals who are currently buying insurance through a SEP have the ability to be slightly more strategic and purchase low net premium plans that can likely be negative premium plans once MLR rebates are processed in the summer of 2021 for the 2018-2019-2020 rebate period.

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « Monday Morning Open Thread: Happy Vaisakhi!
Next Post: The Biden campaign’s big structural change »

Reader Interactions

3Comments

  1. 1.

    WaterGirl

    April 13, 2020 at 10:00 am

    Good news, I’ll take it!  Finally something where low income people don’t get the short end of the stick.

  2. 2.

    WereBear

    April 13, 2020 at 10:08 am

    President Obama is still working for us. I’m sure Joe Biden is committed to it as well.

  3. 3.

    Just Chuck

    April 13, 2020 at 10:17 am

    Ah healthcare, where actually providing the service people pay for is called “loss”

Comments are closed.

Primary Sidebar

Image by MomSense (5/10.25)

Recent Comments

  • Goku (aka Amerikan Baka) on Senator Murphy’s Theory of the Case (May 12, 2025 @ 5:49pm)
  • rikyrah on Size matters for science (May 12, 2025 @ 5:49pm)
  • tam1MI on Senator Murphy’s Theory of the Case (May 12, 2025 @ 5:48pm)
  • dnfree on Senator Murphy’s Theory of the Case (May 12, 2025 @ 5:48pm)
  • Glory b on Senator Murphy’s Theory of the Case (May 12, 2025 @ 5:48pm)

PA Supreme Court At Risk

Donate

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
War in Ukraine
Donate to Razom for Ukraine

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

Meetups

Upcoming Ohio Meetup May 17
5/11 Post about the May 17 Ohio Meetup

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)
Fix Nyms with Apostrophes

Hands Off! – Denver, San Diego & Austin

Social Media

Balloon Juice
WaterGirl
TaMara
John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
David Anderson
Major Major Major Major
DougJ NYT Pitchbot
mistermix

Keeping Track

Legal Challenges (Lawfare)
Republicans Fleeing Town Halls (TPM)
21 Letters (to Borrow or Steal)
Search Donations from a Brand

PA Supreme Court At Risk

Donate

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2025 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!